5.2. Öneriler
5.2.2. Araştırılması Gereken Konulara İlişkin Öneriler
1. Bu araştırmada kullanılan öğrenme materyali araştırmacı tarafından geliştirilmiştir. Ancak yazılım geliştirme süreçlerinin takım çalışması gerektirmesi sebebiyle, bundan sonraki araştırmalarda kullanılacak eğitim yazılımlarının geliştirilme süreçlerinde konu alanı uzmanları, web tasarımcısı, sistem yöneticisi, veritabanı yöneticisi, animasyon-grafik tasarımcısı, ses ve görüntü uzmanı gibi uzmanların da yer alması ortaya çıkacak olan materyalin kalitesinin daha yüksek olmasını sağlayacaktır. Böylece öğrencilerin öğrenme materyalini kullanırlarken daha rahat ve istekli olacakları, bu nedenlede sosyal bulunuşluk algılarında bir artış olacağı düşünülmektedir.
2. Uygulama kapsamında kullanılan öğrenme materyali internet temelli olmasına rağmen öğrencilerin bilgisayar ve internet erişimleri sınırlı olduğu için bu avantajlı durum yeterince kullanılamamıştır. Bundan sonraki benzer araştırmalarda internet
temelli öğrenme materyaline ders saatleri dışında da daha fazla erişim olanağı sağlanırsa öğrencilerin akademik başarı düzeylerinin daha da artacağı düşünülmektedir.
3. Bu araştırma 57 öğrencinin katılımıyla gerçekleştirilmiştir ve bu sayı her ne kadar güvenilir istatistiki sonuçlar alınması için minimum gerekliliği karşılasa da, bulguların sağlıklı bir biçimde genellenebilmesi için daha çok öğrencinin katıldığı çalışmaların yapılması önerilmektedir.
4. Bu araştırmanın farklı okul türlerinde, farklı düzeylerde ve disiplinlerde tekrarlanması önerilmektedir.
5. Araştırmanın deneysel sürecinin daha geniş zamana yayılarak tekrarlanması önerilmektedir.
KAYNAKÇA
Anadolu Üniversitesi. (2006). Çevrimiçi Öğrenme Nedir?
http://cevrimici.aof.edu.tr/genel_bilgiler/sub01.htm adresinden 15.10.2008 tarihinde ulaşılmıştır.
Anderson, T. and Garrison, D. R. (1995). Critical thinking in distance education. Developing critical communities in an audio teleconference context. Higher Education, 28, 183-199.
Anderson, T. and Garrison, D. R. (1998). Learning in a networked world: New roles and responsibilities. In C. Gibson (Ed.), Distance learners in higher education. Madison, WI.: Atwood Publishing.
Aragon, S. R. (2003). Creating social presence in online environments. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 100(3).
Argyle, M. and J. Dean. (1965). Eye contact, distance and affiliation. Sociometry, 28(3): 289-304.
Atkins, M. J., Beattie, J. and Dockrell W. B. (1993). Assessment issues in higher education. Newcastle upon Tyne Polytechnic (England).
Aydın, C. H. (2002). Çevrimiçi (Online) öğrenme toplulukları. Açık ve Uzaktan Eğitim Sempozyumu, Eskişehir.
Bates, T. (1995). Technology, open learning and distance education. Routledge, London.
Bibeau, S. (2001). Social presence, isolation, and connectedness in online teaching and learning: From the literature to real life. Journal of Instruction Delivery
Biggs, J. (1999). What the student does: teaching for enhanced learning. Higher Education Research & Development, 18(1), 57–75.
Biocca, F., Harms, C., and Burgoon, J. K. (2003). Toward a more robust theory and measure of social presence: Review and suggested criteria. Presence:
Teleoperators&Virtual Environments, 12(5), 456-480.
Biocca, F., Harms, C., and Gregg, J. (2001). The networked minds measure of social presence: Pilot test of the factor structure and concurrent validity. Paper presented at Presence 2001, Philadelphia, USA, 9-11 October.
Blocher, J. M. (1997). Self-regulation of strategies and motivation to enhance interaction and social presence in computer mediated communication. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Tempe, AZ: Arizona State University.
Brown, E. R. (2001). The Process of Community-Building In Distance Learning Classes. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2).
Brown, G., Bull, J. and Pendlebury, M. (1997). Assessing student learning in higher education.
http://www.google.com/books?hl=tr&lr=&id=HmyRZmxOzRoC&oi=fnd&pg=PR11& dq=Assessing+student+learning+in+higher+education&ots=mKpYXgxnzv&sig=AuajQ4Z Nhc4t3ZB_5-5plBSCvmU#v=onepage&q=&f=false adresinden 5 Aralık 2009
tarihinde ulaşılmıştır.
Bruffee, K. A. (1993). Collaborative learning: Higher education, interdependence, and the authority of knowledge. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
Burgoon, J. K., Buller, D. B., Hale, J. L. and deTurck, M. (1984). Relational messages associated with nonverbal behaviors. Human Communication Research, 10(3), 351- 378.
Burnham, B. R. and Walden, B. (1997). Interactions in Distance Education: A report from the other side. Annual Adult Education Research Conference Proceedings(38th, Stillwater, Oklahoma, May 16-18).
Burton-Royster, P. I. (1995). Students’ perceptions of videotaped college courses: Implications for the study of social presence and new communication technologies. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Delaware.
Burton, P. I., Kovner, E. S., Lears, M. E., and Sen, R. J. (1991). Does your computer have a name?: Explorations of some meaninss of social presence. Unpublished
manuscript. Newark, DE: University of Delaware.
Champness, B. G. (1972). Attitudes towards person-person communications media. In Unpublished communications Studies Group Paper No. E/72011/CH. London:
University College, London.
Christophel, D. (1990). The relationship among teacher immediacy behaviors, student motivation, and learning. Communication Education, 39, 323-340.
Conrad, D. (2002). Deep in the hearts of learners: Insights into the nature of online community. The Journal of Distance Education, 17(1).
Çağıltay, K., Graham, C. R., Lim, B. and Craner, J. (2001). The seven principles of good practice: A practical approach to evaluating online courses. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 20.
Çalışkan, H. (2002). Çevrimiçi (Online) eğitimde öğrenci etkileşimi. Açık ve Uzaktan Eğitim Sempozyumu, Eskişehir.
Çinici, M. A. (2006). Web tabanlı uzaktan eğitimde uyarlanır değerlendirme sistemi tasarımı ve gerçekleştirimi. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
Çuhadar, C. (2008). Oluşturmacılığa dayalı öğretimde etkileşimin blog aracılığı ile geliştirilmesi. Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Anadolu Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Eskişehir.
Çuhadar, C. ve Kuzu, A. (2006). Öğretim ve sosyal etkileşim amaçlı blog kullanımına yönelik öğrenci görüşleri. 6.Uluslararası Eğitim Teknolojileri Konferansı.
Gazimağusa, KKTC, 19-21 Nisan.
Daugherty, M. and Funke, B. L. (1998). University faculty and student perceptions of web-based instruction. The Journal of Distance Education, 13(1).
Dede, C. (1996). The evolution of distance education: Emerging technologies and distributed learning. American Journal of Distance Education, 10(2), 4-36.
Dickey, M. D. (2004). The impact of web-logs (blogs) on student perceptions of isolation and alienation in a web-based distance-learning environment. Open Learning, 19(3).
Driscoll, M. (2002). Web-based tarining; creating e-learning experiences. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer.
Du, H.S. and Wagner, C. (2007). Learning with weblogs: Enhancing cognitive and social knowledge construction. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 50(1).
Dziuban, C. and Moskal, P. (2001). Emerging research issues in distributed learning. Orlando, FL: Paper delivered at the 7th Sloan-C International Conference on
Asynchronous Learning Networks.
Enocta Akademi. (2009). E-öğrenme nedir? http://www.enoctaakademi.com/?P=Elearning adresinden 08.11.2009 tarihinde ulaşılmıştır.
Ergün, M. ve Özsüer, S. (2006). Vygotsky’nin yeniden değerlendirilmesi. Afyon Karahisar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 2, 269-292.
Ferdig, R. E. and Trammell, K. D. (2004). Content delivery in the ‘Blogosphere’. Technological Horizons in Education Journal, 31(7), 12-20.
Fulford, C. P. and Zhang, S. (1993). Perceptions of interaction: The critical predictor in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 7(3), 8-21.
Garrison, D. R. (1991). Critical thinking and adult education: A conceptual model for developing critical thinking in adult learners. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 10(4), 287–303.
Garrison, D. R. (1993). Quality and theory in distance education: Theoretical
considerations. In D. Keegan (Ed.),Theoretical principles of distance education, New York: Routiedge.
Garrison, D. R. (1997). Computer conferencing: The post-industrial age of distance education. Open Learning: The Journal of Open and Distance Learning, 12(2), 3- 11.
Garrison, D. R. (2000). Theoretical challenges for distance education in the 21st century: A shift from structural to transactional issues. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 1(1).
Gorham, J. (1988). The relationship between verbal teacher immediacy behaviors and student learning. Communication Education, 37(1), 40-53.
Gunawardena, C. N. (1995). Social presence theory and implications for interaction and collaborative learning in computer conferences. International Jl. of Educational Telecommunications, 1(2/3), 147-166.
Gunawardena, C. N. and Zittle, F. (1997). Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer-mediated conferencing environment. The American Journal of Distance Education, 11(3), 8-26.
Gülbahar, Y. (2009). E-öğrenme. Pegem Akademi. ISBN 978-605-4282-09-8.
Hackman, M. Z. and Walker, K. B. (1990). Instructional communication in the televised classroom: The effects of system design and teacher immediacy on student learning and satisfaction. Communication Education, 39(3), 196-209.
Harasim, L. M. (1990). Online education: Perspectives on a new environment. New York: Praeger.
Harms, C. and A.Biocca, F. (2004). Internal consistency and reliability of the
networked minds social presence measure. In M. Alcaniz & B. Rey (Eds.), Seventh Annual International Workshop: Presence 2004. Valencia: Universidad Politecnica deValencia.
Henderson, A. J. (2003). The e-learning question and answer book; a survival guide for trainers and business managers.
http://books.google.com.tr/books?id=GYZ6Ll1ykYkC&pg=PA1&lpg=PA1&dq=The+e- learning+question+and+answer+book%3B+a+survival+guide+for+trainers+and+business+ managers&source=bl&ots=gCUz7n0bde&sig=s97QZ7WWllUWXNme-S_npqVg3-
Y&hl=tr&ei=TaYDS7fnIqXYmwOL_rF9&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1& ved=0CAgQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=&f=false adresinden 18.11.2009 tarihinde
ulaşılmıştır.
Henri, F. and Rigault, R. (1996). Collaborative distance learning and computer
conferencing. In T. Liao (Ed.), Advanced educational technology: Research issues and future potential (pp. 45–76). New York: Springer.
Hillman, D. C., Willis, D. J. and Gunawardena, C. N. (1994). Learner-Interface interaction in distance education: An extension of contemporary models and strategies for
Hiltz, S. R. (1998). Collaborative learning in asynchronous learning networks: Building learning communities. WebNet 98 World Conference of the WWW, Internet and Intranet Proceedings. Orlando Florida.
Holmberg, B. (1991). The feasibility of a predictive theory of distance education: What are we allowed to expect? In B. Holmberg & G. Ortner (Eds.), Research into distance education. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Huang, H. (2000). Instruction technologies for facilitating online courses. Educational Technology, 40(4), 41-46.
Johansen, R., Vallee, J. and Spangler, K. (1988). Teleconferencing: Electronic group communication. In R. S. Cathcart, & L. A. Samovar (Eds.), Small group
communication: a reader (5th ed.) (pp. 140–154). Menlo Park, CA: Institute for the Future.
Jung, I., Choi, S., Lim, C. and Leem, J. (2002). Effects of different types of interaction on learning achievement, satisfaction and participation in web-based interaction.
Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 39(2), 153-162.
Kang, M., Choi, H. and Park, S. (2007). Construction and validation of a social presence scale for measuring online learners’ involvement. In C. Montgomerie & J.
Seale(Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications (pp. 1829-1833). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
Karataş, S. (2008). Interaction in the internet-based distance learning researches: Results of a trend analysis. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 7(2), Article 2.
Katz, Y. (2000). The comparative suitability of three ICT distance learning methodologies for college level instruction. Education Media International, 37(1), 25-30.
Kaya, Z. (2006). Öğretim teknolojileri ve materyal geliştirme. Ankara Pegem A Yayıncılık.
Kelley, D. H. and Gorham, J. (1988). Effects of immediacy on recall of information. Communication Education, 37(3), 198-207.
Khan, B.H. (1997). Web-based instruction (WBI): What is it and why is it? In B.H. Kahn (Ed.), Web-based instruction (pp. 5-19). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
Kip, B. (2007). Çevrimiçi öğrenenlerin farklı destek ortamlarını kullanma sıklıklarıyla sosyal bulunuşluk algıları arasındaki ilişki. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Eskişehir.
Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., Jochems, W. and Van Buuren, H. (2004). Determining sociability, social space, and social presence in (A)synchronous collaborative groups. Cyberpsychology & Behavior 7(2).
Kruh, J. J. and Murphy, K. L. (1990). Interaction in teleconferencing: The key to quality instruction. Paper presented at the Annual Rural and Small Schools Conference (12th, Manhattan, KS, October 29-31).
Kurubacak, G. (2002). Accomplishing access & equity in education: Using the web to design and deliver courses online. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 3(4).
Kutlu, Ö., Doğan, C. D. ve Karakaya, İ. (2009). Öğrenci başarısının belirlenmesi. Ankara: Pegem Akademi. 2. Baskı.
Kuzu, A. (2005). Oluşturmacılığa dayalı çevrimiçi destekli öğretim: Bir eylem araştırması. Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Anadolu Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Eskişehir.
Lee, J., Bray, M., Carter-Wells, J., Glaeser, B., Ivers, K. and Street, C. (2004). Discovering the meaning of community in an online master’s degree program. Association for Educational Communications and Technology, 27th, Chicago, IL, October 19-23
Leh, A. S. (2001). Computer-mediated communication and social presence in a distance learning environment. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 7(2), 109-128.
Lewis, D. J. A. and Sewell, R. D. E. (2007). Instructional design and assessment: Providing formative feedback from a summative computer-aided assessment. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 71(2), Article 33.
Lu Y., Huang, W., Ma, H. and Luce, T. (2007). Interaction, social presence in technology mediated learning - A partial least square model. Proceedings of Wireless
Communication, Networking, Mobile Computing, WiCOM Management Track: Information System & Management,China.
Marriott, P. and Lau A. (2008). The use of on-line summative assessment in an
undergraduate financial accounting course. Journal of Accounting Education, 26, 73- 90.
McLellan, H. (1999). Online education as interactive experience: Some guiding models. Educational Technology, 36-42.
Mcmillan, J. H. (2007). Formative classroom assessment, theory into practice. Teachers College Press: United States of America.
Moallem, M. (2003). An interactive online course: A collaborative design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51(4), 85-103.
Moore, M. G. (1989). Three types of interaction. The American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1-6.
Moore, M. G. and Anderson, W. G. (2003). Handbook of Distance Education. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers. Mahwah, New Jersey, London.
Moore, M. and Kearsley, G. (1996). Distance education: A systems view. Toronto:Wadsworth.
Mutlu, M. E., Kip, B. ve Kayabaş, İ. (2005). Açıköğretim e-öğrenme sisteminde öğrenci- içerik etkileşimi. V. Uluslararası Eğitim Teknolojileri Konferansı. Sakarya: Sakarya Üniversitesi.
Newberry, B. (2001). Raising student social presence in online classes. In Webnet 2001: World Conference on the WWW and Internet Proceedings (Orlando, FL, October 23- 27).
Olpak, Y. Z. ve Kılıç-Çakmak, E. (2009). E-Öğrenme Ortamları İçin Sosyal Bulunuşluk Ölçeğinin Uyarlama Çalışması. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. Cilt:VI, Sayı:I, 142-160. http://efdergi.yyu.edu.tr.
Ökten, A. (2009). Effects of formative assessment application on students’ language profiency and beliefs in language learning in E.F.L context: A case study.
Unpublished master’s thesis. Çukurova University Institute Of Social Studies, Adana.
Palloff, R. M. and Pratt, K. (1999). Building learning communities in cyberspace: Affective strategies for online classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
Perse, E. M., Burton, P. I., Lears, M. E., Kovner, E. S. and Sen, R. J. (1992). Predicting computer-mediated communication in a college class. Communication Research Reports, 9(2), 161-170.
Picciano, A. G. (2002). Beyond student perceptions: Issues of interaction, presence, and performance in an online course. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 6(1).
Piccoli, G., Ahmad, R. and Ives, B. (2001). Web-based virtual learning environments: A research framework and a preliminary assessment of effectiveness in basic it skills training. MIS Quarterly, 25(4), 401-426.
QAA (2006). Section 6: Assessment of students, code of practice for the assurance of academic quality and standards in higher education.
http://www.qaa.ac.uk/academicinfrastructure/codeOfPractice/section6/COP_AOS.pdf adresinden 20.12.2009 tarihinde ulaşılmıştır.
Rachael, F.K. (2005). An exploratory study on how weblog technologies fit virtual community members’ social needs. Proceedings of the Eleventh Americas Conference on Information Systems, Omaha, NE, USA August 11th-14th.
Richardson, J. C. and Swan, K. (2003). Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students’ percieved learning and satisfaction. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(1).
Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D. R. and Archer, W. (1999). Assessing social
presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferencing. The Journal of Distance Education, 14(2), 50-71.
Rovai, A. P. (2001). Building and sustaining community in asynchronous learning networks. Internet and Higher Education, 3(2000), 285-297.
Rovai, A. (2002a). Building sense of community at a distance. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 3(1).
Rovai, A. (2002b). Sense of community, perceived cognitive learning, and persistence in asynchronous learning networks. Internet and Higher Education, 5, 319-332.
Saba, F. and Shearer, R. (1994). Verifying key theoretical concepts in a dynamic model of distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 8(1), 36-59.
Scollins-Mantha, B. (2008). Cultivating social presence in the online learning classroom: A literature review with recommendations for practice. International Journal of
Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 5(3).
Shin, N. (2003). Transactional presence as a critical predictor of success in distance learning. Distance Education, 24(1).
Short, J. E., Williams, E. and Christie, B. The social psychology of telecommunications. New York: Wiley, 1976.
Soo, K. and Bonk, C. (1998). Interaction: What does it mean in online distance education? Paper presented at World Conference on Educational
Telecommunications, Freeburg Germany. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 428 724)
Steinfield, C. W. (1986). Computer-mediated communication in an organizational setting: Explaining task-related and socioemotional uses. In M. L.
McLaughlin(Ed.), Communication yearbook 9 (777-804). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Su, B., Bonk, C. J., Magjuka, R. J., Liu, X. and Lee, S. (2005). The importance of interaction in web-based education: A program-level case study of online MBA courses. The Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 4(1), 1-19.
Sutton, L. A. (2000). Vicarious interaction in a course enhanced through the use of computer- mediated communication.Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Arizona State University, Tempe.
Sutton, L.A. (2001).The principle of vicarious interaction in computer-mediated
communications. International Jl. of Educational Telecommunications, 7(3), 223- 242.
Swan, K. (2001). Virtual interaction: Design factors affecting student satisfaction and perceived learning in asynchronous online courses. Distance Education, 22(2), 306- 331.
Trotter, E. (2006). Student perceptions of continuous summative assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(5), 505–521.
Tu, C.-H. (2000a). On-line learning migration: From social learning theory to social presence theory in a CMC environment. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 23, 27-37
Tu, C.-H. (2000b). Strategies to increase interaction in online social learning
environments. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference: Proceedings of SITE.
Tu, C.-H. (2000c). Critical examination of factors affecting interaction on CMC. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 23(1), 39-58.
Tu, C.-H. (2000d). An examination of social presence to increase interaction in online classes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University, Arizona.
Tu, C.-H. (2002a). The relationship between social presence and online privacy. The Internet and Higher Education, 5(2002), 293-318.
Tu, C.-H. (2002b). The measurement of social presence in an online learning environment. International Journal on E-learning, April-June:34-45.
Tu, C.-H. and Corry, M. (2001). A paradigm shift for online community research. Distance Education, 22(2), 245-263.
Tu, C.-H. and Corry, M. (2002). Research in online learning community. E-journal of Instructional Science and Technology, 5(1).
Tu, C.-H. and McIsaac, M. (2002). The relationship of social presence and interaction in online classes. American Journal of Distance Education, 16(3), 131-150.
Türk Dil Kurumu. (2010). Forum Nedir?
http://tdkterim.gov.tr/bts/?kategori=verilst&kelime=forum&ayn=tam adresinden 08.02.2010 tarihinde ulaşılmıştır.
Valasek, T. (2001). Student persistence in web-based courses: Identifying a profile for success. Produced as part of a Raritann Valley Community College Center for the Advancement of Innovative Teaching and Learning (CAITL) In-College Sabbatical.
Varol, A. ve Türel, Y. K. (2003). Çevrimiçi uzaktan eğitimde iletişim modülü. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 2(1), Article 6.
Vos, H. (2000). How to assess for improvement of learning. European Journal of Engineering Education, 25(3), 227-233.
Vrasidas, C. and McIsaac, M. S. (1999). Factors influencing interaction in an online course. American Journal of Distance Education,13(3), 22-36.
Wagner, E. D. (1994). In support of a functional definition of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 8(2), 6-29.
Walther, J. B. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Communication Research, 19(1), 52-90.
Waltonen-Moore, S., Stuart, D., Newton, E., Oswald, R. and Varonis, E. (2006). From virtual strangers to a cohesive online learning community: The evolution of online group development in a professional development course. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14(2), 287-311.
Wang, M., Sierra, C. and Folger, T. (2003). Building a dynamic online learning community among adult learners. Educational Media International, 40(1-2), 49-61.
Wellman, B. (1999). The network community: An introduction to networks in the global village. In Wellman, B. (Ed.) Networks in the Global Village. p.1-48. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Wheeler, S. (2005). Creating social presence in digital learning environments: A presence of mind? Featured Paper for the TAFE Conference, Queensland, Australia. Whiteman, Jo Ann M. (2002). Interpersonal communication in computer mediated learning. ERIC veritabanı numarası: ED 465 997.
Wiener, M. and Mehrabian, A. (1968). Language within language: Immediacy, a channel in verbal communication. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. Wikipedia. (2008). Internet Relay Chat Nedir?
http://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_Relay_Chat adresinden 15.10.2008 tarihinde ulaşılmıştır.
Winn, W. (1999). Learning in virtual environments: A theoretical framework and considerations for design. Education Media International, 36(4), 271-279.
Wise, A., Chang, J., Duffy, T. and Del Valle, R. (2004). The effects of teacher social presence on student satisfaction, engagement, and learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 31(3), 247-271.
Witmer, D. F. (1997). Risky business: Why people feel safe in sexually explicit on-line communication. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 2(4).
Woods, R. H. and Baker, J. D. (2004). Interaction and immediacy in online learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 5(2).
Woods, R. and Ebersole, S. (2003). Social networking in the online classroom: Foundations of effective online learning. EJournal, 12/13(1).
Yalın, H. İ. (2002). Öğretim teknolojileri ve materyal geliştirme. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
Yaw, D. C. (2005). An evaluation of e-learning in industry at level three based upon the kirkpatrick model. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Indiana State University, Terre Haute, Indiana.
EKLER 1. Akademik Başarı Testi
2. Öz Değerlendirme Formları
A. Deney Grubundaki Öğrencilerin Kullandığı Öz Değerlendirme Formu B. Kontrol Grubundaki Öğrencilerin Kullandığı Öz Değerlendirme Formu 3. Grup İçi Değerlendirme Formları
A. Deney Grubundaki Öğrencilerin Kullandığı Grup İçi Değerlendirme Formu B. Kontrol Grubundaki Öğrencilerin Kullandığı Grup İçi Değerlendirme Formu 4. Gruplar Arası Değerlendirme Formu
5. Haftalık Görevler
A. Haftalık Görev-1 B. Haftalık Görev-2 C. Haftalık Görev-3 D. Haftalık Görev-4 6. Haftalık Değerlendirme Formu 7. Yönergeler
A. Deney Grubundaki Öğrenciler İçin Hazırlanan Yönerge B. Kontrol Grubundaki Öğrenciler İçin Hazırlanan Yönerge
EK-1. AKADEMİK BAŞARI TESTİ 1. Microsoft Excel programını açınız.
2. Çalışma kitabını test_ÖğrenciNo şeklinde kaydediniz (Örnek: test_076013001). 3. Z50 hücresine küçük harflerle adınızı yazınız.
4. Çalışma kitabında bulunan Sayfa1 isimli çalışma sayfasının adını NotÇizelgesi olarak değiştiriniz.
5. NotÇizelgesi olarak isimlendirdiğiniz çalışma sayfasını yine aynı çalışma kitabında bulunan Sayfa2 ve Sayfa3 isimli çalışma sayfalarının arasına taşıyınız.
6. NotÇizelgesi olarak isimlendirdiğiniz çalışma sayfasının B2 hücresine Öğrenci No,