SURFACES SATISFYING
−
R (X,Y).H=0 Bengü KILIÇ
Balikesir University Faculty of Art and Sciences Department of Mathematics
Balikesir, TURKEY E-mail:benguklc@yahoo.com
Abstract
In this study we consider the surfaces n
M in IE5satisfying the condition (X,Y).H=0 −
R
where H is the mean curvature vector of M.
Keywords: Semi-parallel, Semi-symmetric space, Özet
Bu çalışmada, H ortalama eğrilik vektörü olmak üzere, −R(X,Y).H=0 şartını sağlayan IE5 deki
n
M yüzeyleri gözönüne alındı.
Anahtar Kelimeler:Semi-paralel, Semi-simetrik uzay. 1- INTRODUCTION
Let x: be an isometric immersion of an n-dimensional Riemannian manifold m n E M → n
M into m-dimensional Euclidean space IE . Denote by m −
R the curvature tensor of the van der Waerden-Bortolotti connection of x and by h the second fundamental form of x. x is called semi-parallel if , i.e. for all tangent vectors X and Y to M, where acts as a derivation on h. This notion is an extrinsic analogue for semi-symmetric spaces, i.e. Riemannian manifolds for which R.R=0, and a direct generalization of parallel immersions, i.e. isometric immersions for which . In [1], J. Deprez showed the fact that x: is semi-parallel implies that M is semi-symmetric.
− ∇ 0 . = − h R ( , ). =0 − h Y X R ) , (X Y R − 0 = ∇− h m E M →
For references on semi-symmetric space, see [2]; for references on parallel immersions, see [3]. In [1], J. Deprez gave a local classification of semi-parallel hypersurfaces in Euclidean space. It is easily seen that all surfaces are semi-symmetric. In [4] J. Deprez gave a full classification of semi-parallel surfaces in m
IE . In the present study we consider the surfaces n
M in IE satisfying the condition 5 0 ). , ( = − H Y X R (1) where H is the mean curvature vector of M. We have shown that surfaces in 5
IE satisfying the property (1) are minimal or totally umbilic or has trivial normal connections.
2-BASIC RESULTS
Let x: be an isometric immersion of an n-dimensional (connected) Riemannian manifold m n E M → n
M into m-dimensional Euclidean space IE . Let m ν be a local unit normal section on M. In the sequel X, Y, Z, U, V denote vector fields which are tangent to n
M . Then the formulas of Gauss and Weingarten are given by
) , ( ~ Y X h Y Y X X =∇ + ∇ (2) and ν ν ν X X =−A X +D ∇~ (3)
respectively, where ∇~ is the Levi Civita connection on m
IE , the Levi Civita connection on
∇
n
M and D the normal connection of x. The second fundamental tensor is related to the second fundamental form h by
ν
A
> >=<
< AνX,Y h(X,Y),ν (4)
where < , > is a standart metric of m
IE .
If M is a surface, the Gaussian curvature of M at x∈M becomes
> =< R X Y X Y x
K( ) ( , ) , (5)
where X and Y form an orthonormal basis for . The mean curvature vector H of x is given by M Tx
∑
= = n i i i e e h n H 1 ) , ( 1 (6) where is the orthonormal basis of . The mean curvature α of x becomes n e e e1, 2,..., TxM > < = H ,H α .A totaly geodesic immersion x is an isometric immersion for which h=0. If H=0 then x is called minimal and x is called totally umbilical if
H Y X Y X h( , )=< , >
where X, Y is an orthonormal basis of M. The immersion x is called isotropic (in the sense of O'Neill [5] ) if for each x in M h(X,X) is independent of the choice of a unit vector X in TxM.
Let XΛY denote the endomorphism Z →< Z,Y > X−<Z,X >Y. Then the
curvature tensor R of M is given by the equation of Gauss:
∑
= Λ = p i i iX AY A Y X R 1 ) , ( (7) where and i AAi = ν {ν1,...,νp} is a local orthonormal basis for . The equation of
Ricci becomes M Tx⊥ > >=< < ⊥ Y X A A Y X R ( , )ν,η [ ν, η] , (8) for ν and η normal vectors to M . An isometric immersion x is said to have trivial normal connection if ⊥ =0. (8) shows that triviality of the normal connection of x is
Let M be an n-dimensional Riemannian manifold and T be a (0, k)-type tensor on M. The tensor R.T is defined by
) ) , ( ~ , , , ( ) , ) , ( ~ , , ( ) , , ) , ( ~ , ( ) , , , ) , ( ~ ( ) , , , )( ). , ( ~ ( ) , ; , , , )( . ( 4 3 2 1 4 3 2 1 4 3 2 1 4 3 2 1 4 3 2 1 4 3 2 1 X Y X R X X X T X X Y X R X X T X X X Y X R X T X X X X Y X R T X X X X T Y X R Y X X X X X T R − − − = = (9) where )X1,X2,X3,X4,X,Y∈χ(M .
Let be the connection of van der Waerden-Bortolotti of x, denote the curvature tensor of by − ∇ − ∇ R then − ) ) , ( , ( ) , ) , ( ( ) , ( ) , ( ) , )( ). , ( (R X Y h U V = R⊥ X Y hU V −h R X Y U V −hU R X Y V − (10) Lemma 1. Let M be a surface in IE then 5
3 3 2 3 2 2 3 2 1 3 3 2 2 1 1 2 1 ] 2 2 ) ( ] 2 2 ) ( [ ) )( ( ) , )( ). , ( ( ν β µ λ λ ν β µ λ λ ν µ λ Kb a b Kb a b b a b a e e h e e R + − − + + + − − + + − = − (11) and 3 3 2 3 2 2 3 2 1 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 1 ] 2 2 ) ( ] 2 2 ) ( [ ) )( ( ) , )( ). , ( ( ν β µ λ µ ν β µ λ µ ν µ λ Kb a b Kb a b b a b a e e h e e R − + − + − − − − + + − − = − (12) where K is the Gaussian curvature of M⊂ 5
IE and β =a2b3 −a3b2. Proof. (see [6]).
3-SURFACES SATISFYING
−
R (X,Y).H=0
Definition 2. Let M be a surface in IE5 then we define R .H by
− )} , )( . ( ) , )( . {( 2 1 ). , (e1 e2 H Rh e1 e1 R h e2 e2 R − − − + = (13)
where e1,e2 is an orthonormal basis of the surface M.
Corollary 3. } ) )( ( ) )( ( { 2 1 } ] ) ( ) ( [ ] ) ( ) ( {[ 2 1 ) , ( 3 3 2 2 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 1 ν µ λ µ λ ν µ λ µ λ ν µ λ µ µ λ λ ν µ λ µ µ λ λ + − − + − − = − − − − + − − − − = − b b b b b b H e e R (14)
Proof. By Lemma 1 and (6) we get the result.
Proposition 4. [7] Let M be a surfaces in IE5 and ν1,...,νp orthonormal vectors in N(M) such that ν1 is in the direction of the mean curvature vector and such that
. 0 ...
4 = = A p =
Aν ν If we choose an orthonormal basis of TM of eigenvectors of . Identifying linear transformations and their matrices in this basis, we obtain
1 1 Aν A = ⎥ ⎦ ⎤ ⎢ ⎣ ⎡ = = µ λ ν 0 0 1 1 A A , ⎥, . (15) ⎦ ⎤ ⎢ ⎣ ⎡ − = = 2 2 2 2 2 2 a b b a A A ν ⎥ ⎦ ⎤ ⎢ ⎣ ⎡ − = = 3 3 3 3 3 3 a b b a A A ν
Theorem 5. Let M be a surface in IE satisfying the property 5 then M is one of the following surfaces:
0
. =
−
H R
1) a totally umbilic surface with λ =µ, or
2) a surfaces with trivial normal connection and H =2λ, or 3) a minimal surface.
Proof. If . =0 then by previous Corollary we get
− H R 0 ) )( ( ) )( ( 2 3 3 2 − + − − + = −b λ µ λ µ ν b λ µ λ µν . (16) Thus, we have b2(λ−µ)(λ+µ)=0 and b3(λ−µ)(λ+µ)=0. (17) Therefore we have three possibilities
1) If b2 = b3 = 0, a2 = a3 = 0 then the equations (16) and (17) are automatically satisfied. Therefore M is totally umbilic.
2) If b2 = b3 = 0, a2 ≠ 0, a3 ≠ 0 then by (15) we get ⎥ ⎦ ⎤ ⎢ ⎣ ⎡ = µ λ 0 0 1 A , ⎥, ⎦ ⎤ ⎢ ⎣ ⎡ − = 2 2 2 0 0 a a A ⎥ ⎦ ⎤ ⎢ ⎣ ⎡ − = 3 3 3 0 0 a a A
which implies that ⊥ =0 i.e. M has trivial normal connection.
R
If λ =µ then the equations (16) and (17) are automatically satisfied and by (15) we get H=2λ.
3) If λ =−µ then the equations (16) and (17) are automatically satisfied and by (15) we get H=0 (i.e. M is minimal).
REFERENCES
[1] J. Deprez, “Semi-parallel Hypersurfaces”, Rend. Sem. Mat. Univers. Politechn. Torino (1986) 44, 2, 303-316.
[2] Z. I. Szabo,“StructureTheorems on Riemannian Spaces Satisfying R(X,Y).R=0”, I. The local version, J. Differential Geometry (1982) 17, 531-582.
[3] D. Ferus, “Symmetric Submanifolds of Euclidean Space”, Math. Ann. (1980) 247, 81-93.
[4] J. Deprez, “Semi-parallel Surfaces in Euclidean Space”, Journal of Geometry (1985) vol 25, 192-200.
[5] B. O' Neill, “Isotropic and Kaehler Immersions”, Canad. J. Math. (1976) 17, 909-915.
[6] C. Özgür, “Pseudo Simetrik Manifoldlar”, PhD. Thesis, Uludag University, Bursa (2001).
[7] U. Lumiste, “Small Dimensional Irreducible Submanifolds with Parallel Third Fundamental Form”, Tartu Ulikooli Toimetised Acta et comm. Univ.
