• Sonuç bulunamadı

Nonlocal KdV equations

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Nonlocal KdV equations"

Copied!
11
0
0

Yükleniyor.... (view fulltext now)

Tam metin

(1)

Contents lists available atScienceDirect

Physics

Letters

A

www.elsevier.com/locate/pla

Nonlocal

KdV

equations

Metin Gürses

a

,

1

,

Aslı Pekcan

b

,

,

1

aDepartmentofMathematics,FacultyofScience,BilkentUniversity,06800Ankara,Turkey bDepartmentofMathematics,FacultyofScience,HacettepeUniversity,06800Ankara,Turkey

a

r

t

i

c

l

e

i

n

f

o

a

b

s

t

r

a

c

t

Articlehistory:

Received23April2020

Receivedinrevisedform10August2020 Accepted14September2020

Availableonline18September2020 CommunicatedbyB.Malomed

Keywords:

Hirota-Satsumasystem LocalandnonlocalKdVequations Ablowitz-Musslimanireductions Hirotamethod

WritingtheHirota-Satsuma(HS)systemofequationsinasymmetricalformwefinditslocalandnew nonlocal reductions. It turns out that all reductions of the HS system are Korteweg-de Vries (KdV), complexKdV,andnewnonlocalKdVequations.Weobtainone-solitonsolutionsoftheseKdVequations byusingthemethodofHirotabilinearization.

©2020ElsevierB.V.Allrightsreserved.

1. Introduction

After Ablowitz and Musslimani introduced nonlocal type of reductions [1–3] we witnessed several works about finding new integrable nonlocal nonlinear partial differential equations and obtaining different kinds of solutions of these local and nonlocal equations. In partic-ular, most of the works focused on nonlocal nonlinear Schrödinger equations (NLS) [1–14], nonlocal modified Korteweg-de Vries (mKdV) equations [2–4], [8], [15–18], nonlocal sine-Gordon (SG) equations [2–4], [19], and so on [20–33].

Recently, it has been shown that systems admitting nonlocal reductions have discrete symmetry transformations leaving the systems invariant. In [34] we showed that a special case of discrete symmetry transformations are actually the nonlocal reductions of the same systems. The connection between local and nonlocal reductions was given in [35], [36]. Among all the nonlocal equations presented so far in the literature, nonlocal KdV equation is missing. It is not possible to obtain it from the nonlocal reductions of the AKNS system. For this purpose, we use the Hirota-Satsuma (HS) system and its reductions.

The original integrable HS system of equations [37–46] is given by apt

=

1

2pxxx

+

3ppx

6qqx

,

(1)

aqt

= −

qxxx

3pqx

.

(2)

This system has a recursion operator [39], [40], [46], N-soliton

solutions, and infinitely many conserved quantities [

52]. Several methods were applied to find solutions of (1) and (2) such as Hirota bilinear method [37], [43], [47], dressing operator technique [48], Darboux transformation method [49], [50], formally variable separation approach [51], and so on. The above form of the HS system is not appro-priate for consistent local and nonlocal reductions. It is more useful to map it to a more symmetrical version. By letting

p

=

1

2

(

u

+

v

),

q

=

γ

(

u

v

)

(3)

with γ2

=

1

4, we obtain the symmetrical integrable HS system [53–57]

*

Correspondingauthor.

E-mailaddresses:[email protected](M. Gürses),[email protected](A. Pekcan).

1 Theseauthorscontributedequallytothiswork. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2020.126894

(2)

aut

= −

uxxx

+

3vxxx

6uux

+

6vux

+

12vxu

,

(4)

avt

= −

vxxx

+

3uxxx

6v vx

+

6uvx

+

12vux

,

(5)

where a is

a constant. We can also obtain the recursion operator of the symmetrical HS system from the original one. By the use of this

recursion operator it is possible to obtain

(

2

+

1

)

-dimensional negative HS system.

It is possible to obtain soliton solutions of the above symmetrical HS system by the Hirota bilinearization method. The bilinearizing transformation and the Hirota bilinear form of the original system (1) and (2) were given in [37]. By using the result of [37] with the transformation (3) and introducing two additional constants u0 and v0 and by letting u

=

u0

+

2

(

ln f

)

xx

+

gf and v

=

v0

+

2

(

ln f

)

xx

gf, we obtain the Hirota bilinear form of the system (4) and (5) as

(

aDt

+

4D3x

+ (

18u0

6v0

)

Dx

)

{

g

·

f

} =

0

,

(6)

(

aDxDt

2D4x

6

(

u0

+

v0

)

Dx

)

{

f

·

f

} = −12g

2

.

(7)

If the local or nonlocal reductions of integrable systems are done consistently the reduced equations must also be integrable. In this work we find the integrable reductions of the HS system (4) and (5). All the reductions of the HS system gives a kind of KdV equation. We find the standard KdV equation

aut

=

2uxxx

+

12uux (8)

from the real reduction, complex KdV equation

aut

= −

uxxx

+

3u

¯

xxx

6uux

+

6uu

¯

x

+

12uu

¯

x (9)

from the complex reduction, nonlocal KdV equation

aut

(

x

,

t

)

= −

uxxx

(

x

,

t

)

+

3uxxx

(

x

,

t

)

6u

(

x

,

t

)

ux

(

x

,

t

)

+

6u

(

x

,

t

)

ux

(

x

,

t

)

+

12ux

(

x

,

t

)

u

(

x

,

t

)

(10) from the real nonlocal reduction, and complex nonlocal KdV equations

aut

(

x

,

t

)

= −

uxxx

(

x

,

t

)

+

3uxxx

(

ε

1x

,

ε

2t

)

6u

(

x

,

t

)

ux

(

x

,

t

)

+

6u

(

ε

1x

,

ε

2t

)

ux

(

x

,

t

)

+

12ux

(

ε

1x

,

ε

2t

)

u

(

x

,

t

)

(11) from the nonlocal complex reductions, where ε2

1

=

ε

22

=

1. We give the derivation of all these equations in Section 3. In Section 4 we obtain the one-soliton solutions of the above local and nonlocal KdV equations by using the one-soliton solutions of the HS system obtained in Section2and the reduction constraints.

2. One-solitonsolutionsoftheHSsystem

To obtain the soliton solutions of the reduced equations we need the soliton solutions of the HS system. For this purpose, we use the Hirota bilinear equations given in (6) and (7).

Let g

=

ε

g1 and f

=

1

+

ε

2f2 where g1

=

ceθ1 for

θ

1

=

k1x

+

ω

1t

+ δ

1and c is

a constant, in the Hirota bilinear equations (

6) and (7). From the coefficient of ε, we get the dispersion relation

ω

1

=

4k3

1

+ (

6v0

18u0

)

k1

a (12)

if c

=

0. The coefficient of ε2 gives

af2,xt

2 f2,xxxx

6

(

u0

+

v0

)

f2,xx

= −

6c2e2k1x+2ω1+2δ1 (13) yielding f2

=

A1ek2x+ω2t+δ2

+

A2e2k1x8k31 a t+2δ1

,

(14) where

ω

2

=

2k32

+

6

(

u0

+

v0

)

k2 a

,

(15) and A2

=

c2 8k21

(

k21

+

2u0

)

,

(16)

and A1is an arbitrary constant. For c

=

0, A1

=

0, the coefficients of ε3 and ε4vanish if

k2

=

k1

±



k21

4u0

.

(17)

(3)

u

(

x

,

t

)

=

u0

+

c

(

1

+

A 2e3θ1

+

A112

)

+

8k21A2e2θ1

+

2 A1k222

+

2 A1A2

(

2k1

k2

)

22+2θ1

(

1

+

A12

+

A2e2θ1

)

2

,

(18) v

(

x

,

t

)

=

v0

+

c

(

1

+

A 2e3θ1

+

A112

)

+

8k21A2e2θ1

+

2 A1k222

+

2 A1A2

(

2k1

k2

)

22+2θ1

(

1

+

A12

+

A2e2θ1

)

2

,

(19)

where

θ

1

=

k1x

+

ω

1t

+ δ

1,

θ

2

=

k2x

+

ω

2t

+ δ

2 with the dispersion relations (12) and (15), and A2 is given by (16). Here A1

,

a

,

c

,

k1

,

δ

1

,

δ

2 are arbitrary constants and k2

=

k1

±



k2

1

4u0. For certain choices of the parameters the functions u and v can

develop singularities

for finite time. These singularities will be transferred to the local and nonlocal reductions of the HS system.

3. ReductionsoftheHSsystem

For the HS system (4) and (5) we have two local and two nonlocal reductions. (a)Localreductions:

(i) Real

reduction:

v

(

x

,

t

)

=

ku

(

x

,

t

)

, k is

a real constant.

The system (4) and (5) consistently reduces to the well-known KdV equation

aut

=

2uxxx

+

12uux

.

(20)

(ii) Complex

reduction:

v

(

x

,

t

)

=

ku

¯

(

x

,

t

)

, k is

a real constant.

Under this reduction the system (4) and (5) reduces to the complex KdV equation

aut

= −

uxxx

+

3u

¯

xxx

6uux

+

6uu

¯

x

+

12uu

¯

x

,

(21)

consistently, if a

= ¯

a.

(b)Nonlocalreductions:

(i) Real

nonlocal reductions:

v

(

x

,

t

)

=

ku

(

ε

1x

,

ε

2t

)

, ε21

=

ε

22

=

1, k is

a real constant.

When we apply this reduction to the system (4) and (5), it yields that to have a consistent reduction we must have k

=

1 and ε1

ε

2

=

1 i.e. ε1

=

ε

2

= −

1. Hence we get the reduced nonlocal ST-reversal KdV equation

aut

(

x

,

t

)

= −

uxxx

(

x

,

t

)

+

3uxxx

(

x

,

t

)

6u

(

x

,

t

)

ux

(

x

,

t

)

+

6u

(

x

,

t

)

ux

(

x

,

t

)

+

12ux

(

x

,

t

)

u

(

x

,

t

).

(22) (ii) Complex

nonlocal reductions:

v

(

x

,

t

)

=

ku

¯

(

ε

1x

,

ε

2t

)

, ε21

=

ε

22

=

1, k is

a real constant.

This reduction reduces the system (4) and (5) consistently if k

=

1 and a

= ¯

a

ε

1

ε

2. Therefore we have the following nonlocal complex KdV equations:

aut

(

x

,

t

)

= −

uxxx

(

x

,

t

)

+

3u

¯

xxx

(

ε

1x

,

ε

2t

)

6u

(

x

,

t

)

ux

(

x

,

t

)

+

6u

¯

(

ε

1x

,

ε

2t

)

ux

(

x

,

t

)

+

12u

¯

x

(

ε

1x

,

ε

2t

)

u

(

x

,

t

).

(23) Explicitly, here we have three nonlocal complex KdV equations.

(a)S-reversalnonlocalcomplexKdVequation:

aut

(

x

,

t

)

= −

uxxx

(

x

,

t

)

+

3u

¯

xxx

(

x

,

t

)

6u

(

x

,

t

)

ux

(

x

,

t

)

+

6u

¯

(

x

,

t

)

ux

(

x

,

t

)

+

12¯ux

(

x

,

t

)

u

(

x

,

t

),

(24) where a is

a pure imaginary number.

(b)T-reversalnonlocalcomplexKdVequation:

aut

(

x

,

t

)

= −

uxxx

(

x

,

t

)

+

3u

¯

xxx

(

x

,

t

)

6u

(

x

,

t

)

ux

(

x

,

t

)

+

6u

¯

(

x

,

t

)

ux

(

x

,

t

)

+

12¯ux

(

x

,

t

)

u

(

x

,

t

),

(25) where a is

a pure imaginary number.

(c)ST-reversalnonlocalcomplexKdVequation:

aut

(

x

,

t

)

= −

uxxx

(

x

,

t

)

+

3u

¯

xxx

(

x

,

t

)

6u

(

x

,

t

)

ux

(

x

,

t

)

+

6u

¯

(

x

,

t

)

ux

(

x

,

t

)

+

12¯ux

(

x

,

t

)

u

(

x

,

t

),

(26) where a is

a real number.

4. One-solitonsolutionsofthereducedKdVequations

Using the soliton solutions of the HS system obtained in Section 2and the reduction formulas we obtain one-soliton solutions of the reduced equations.

(4)

Fig. 1. One-soliton solution for (21) with the parameters k1=12,u0= −1=a=A1=1, δ1= δ2=0.

4.1. One-solitonsolutionsofthereducedlocalKdVequations

(i) v

(

x

,

t

)

=

u

(

x

,

t

)

(KdV equation).

This reduction relation holds if u0

=

v0 and c

=

0 yielding A2

=

0 and g

(

x

,

t

)

=

0. Hence we obtain the one-soliton solution of the equation (20) as u

(

x

,

t

)

=

u0

+

2 A1k222

(

1

+

A12

)

2

,

(27) where

θ

2

=

k2x

+

(2k3 2+12u0k2)

a t

+ δ

2and A1

=

. Here k2

,

a

,

u0

,

δ

2

,

δ

are some arbitrary constants. Let us take all the parameters real. Then the above solution is nonsingular and bounded soliton solution for A1

>

0. If A1

<

0, the real-valued solution is singular.

(ii) v

(

x

,

t

)

= ¯

u

(

x

,

t

)

, a

= ¯

a (Complex

KdV equation).

Let

k2

1

4u0

0 i.e. u0

≤ −

k2 1

4, k1

,

u0

∈ R

yielding k2

∈ R

. If we use the Type 1 approach [7], [8], [15] we get the following constraints on the parameters of the one-soliton solution of the reduced complex local KdV equation (21):

1

)

v0

=

u0

,

c

= −¯

c

,

1

=

e¯δ1

,

2

=

e¯δ2

,

A1

= ¯

A1

,

(28)

2

)

v0

=

u0

,

c

= ¯

c

,

1

= −

e¯δ1

,

2

=

e¯δ2

,

A1

= ¯

A1

,

(29)

3

)

v0

=

u0

,

c

= ¯

c

,

1

= −

e¯δ1

,

2

= −

e¯δ2

,

A1

= − ¯

A1

.

(30)

The above sets of the constraints give similar solutions. Let us consider the first set of the constraints. Let c

=

i

α

, α

∈ R

. Hence one-soliton solution of (21) is u

(

x

,

t

)

=

u0

+

i

α

[

1

+

A 112

α 2 8k21(k21+2u0)e 3θ1

] +

2 A 1k222

α 2 k21+2u0e 2θ1

A1α2 4k21(k21+2u0)e θ2+2θ1



1

+

A12

α 2 8k21(k21+2u0)e 2θ1



2

,

(31) where

θ

1

=

k1x

+

4k 3 1−12u0k1 a t

+ δ

1,

θ

2

=

k2x

+

2k32+12u0k2 a t

+ δ

2 with k2

=

k1

±



k2 1

4u0. For u0

<

k2 1 2

≤ −

k2 1

4 with A1

>

0, the above solution is nonsingular and bounded. When these conditions are relaxed the solution (31) may develop singularity in a finite time. Example1.

Let us take the parameters as

k1

=

12

,

u0

= −

1

,

α

=

a

=

A1

=

1

,

δ

1

= δ

2

=

0. Hence one-soliton solution of (21) becomes

|

u

(

x

,

t

)

|

2

=

H1

(

x

,

t

)

(

1

+

e(1+ √ 15 2 )x+4t

+

2 7ex+11t

)

4

,

(32) where H1

(

x

,

t

)

=

1

+

ex+11t

+

36 49e 2x+22t

+

4 49e 3x+33t

+

16 2401e 4x+44t

+

8 49e (3+√15)x+(33+3√15)t

+

2e(3+ √ 15 2 )x+(33−3 √ 15 2 )t

+

e(2+ √ 15)x+(22−3√15)t

− (

2

15

+

12

)

e(3+3 √ 15 2 )x+(33−9 √ 15 2 )t

− (

2

15

+

12

)

e(1+ √ 15 2 )x+(11−2 √ 15 2 )t

+ (

12

15

+

53

)

e(1+ √ 15)x+(11−3√15)t

− (

8

15

+

20 49

)

e (5+ √ 15 2 )x+(55+3 √ 15 2 )t

.

(33)

(5)

Fig. 2. One-soliton solution for (22) with the parameters k2=2,u0= −1,a=8.

4.2. One-solitonsolutionsofthereducednonlocalKdVequations

(i) v

(

x

,

t

)

=

u

(

ε

1x

,

ε

2t

)

, ε21

=

ε

22

=

1 (Nonlocal KdV equation).

Recall that the system (4) and (5) reduces to (22) consistently by this reduction if ε1

=

ε

2

= −

1. When we consider the reduction with the solutions u

(

x

,

t

)

and v

(

x

,

t

)

with Type 1 approach, we obtain that k1

=

k2

=

0 giving the trivial solution u

(

x

,

t

)

=

u0. Therefore we apply Type 2 [8], [15]. In this case we have two possibilities:

1

)

A1

=

0

,

u0

=

v0

,

e2δ1A2

= −1

,

(34)

2

)

c

=

0

,

u0

=

v0

,

A12

= ±1

.

(35)

Take also all the parameters as real numbers and consider the following particular cases.

(i).1) From

the first set of the constraints we obtain the one-soliton solution of the reduced nonlocal equation (

22) as u

(

x

,

t

)

=

u0

+

c

(

ek1x+ω1t+δ1

e3k1x+3ω1t+δ1

)

8k2 1e2k1x+2ω1t

(

1

e2k1x+2ω1t

)

2

,

(36) where e2δ1

=

8k 2 1(k21+2u0)

c2 . This solution is a singular solution on the line k1x

+

ω

1t

=

0.

(i).2) In

the second case we have

A2

=

0 and the one-soliton solution of the equation (22) is obtained as

u

(

x

,

t

)

=

u0

+

σ

1

2k22ek2x+ω2t

(

1

+

σ

1ek2x+ω2t

)

2

,

σ

1

= ±

1

.

(37)

Let σ1

=

1, k2

,

u0

,

a

∈ R

. Then the above solution can be rewritten as

u

(

x

,

t

)

=

u0

+

k22 2sech

2

(

k

2x

+

ω

2t

).

(38)

This real-valued solution is nonsingular and bounded. The solution (37) is singular if σ1

= −

1.

Example2.

Let

us choose the parameters as k1

=

2

,

u0

= −

1 giving k2

=

2, A1

=

1

,

δ

2

=

0 satisfying A12

=

1, and a

=

8. Hence a nonsingular and bounded one-soliton solution of (22) is

u

(

x

,

t

)

= −

1

+

2sech2

(

2x

t

).

(39)

The graph of the above solution is given in Fig.2.

(ii) v

(

x

,

t

)

= ¯

u

(

ε

1x

,

ε

2t

)

, a

= ¯

a

ε

1

ε

2, ε21

=

ε

22

=

1 (Nonlocal complex KdV equations).

If we use Type 1, we obtain the below constraints that must be satisfied by the parameters of the one-soliton solution of the nonlocal reduced complex KdV equations (23),

k1

=

ε

1k

¯

1

,

v0

= ¯

u0

=

u0

,

a

= ¯

a

ε

1

ε

2 (40)

with the following possibilities:

1

)

c

= −¯

c

,

A1

= ¯

A1

,

1

=

e¯δ1

,

2

=

e¯δ2

,

(41)

2

)

c

= ¯

c

,

A1

= ¯

A1

,

1

= −

e¯δ1

,

2

=

e¯δ2

,

(42)

(6)

yielding A2

= ¯

A2, ω1

=

ε

2

ω

¯

1, ω2

=

ε

2

ω

¯

2, and k2

=

ε

1k

¯

2 for

u0

≤ −

k21

4

.

(44)

Here for finding one-soliton solutions of (23) we pick the constraints (40) with (41). We have three types of nonlocal reduced complex equations and we will consider one-soliton solutions of them separately. Note that we will mainly focus on some particular cases giving nonsingular and bounded solutions.

(a)S-reversalnonlocalcomplexKdVequation:

In this case, according to the constraints (40) and (41) with a

= ¯

a

ε

1

ε

2 and (44), since

(

ε

1

,

ε

2

)

= (−

1

,

1

)

we have k1

= −¯

k1and a

= −¯

a. Let k1

=

i

α

1, k2

=

i

α

1

(

1

±



1

+

4u0

α2 1

)

=

i

α

2, c

=

i

α

3, a

=

i

α

4 for αj

,

j

=

1

,

2

,

3

,

4

∈ R

. Hence we obtain the one-soliton solution of the S-reversal nonlocal complex equation (24) as

u

(

x

,

t

)

=

u0

+

B1

(

x

,

t

)

(

B2

(

x

,

t

))

2

,

(45) where B1

(

x

,

t

)

=

i

α

3

(

eiα1x+ω1t+δ1

+

A1ei(α1+α2)x+(ω1+ω2)t+δ12

+

A2e3iα1x+3ω1t+3δ1

)

2

α

22A1eiα2x+ω2t+δ2

8

α

21A2e2iα1x+2ω1t+2δ1

2 A1A2

(

2

α

1

α

2

)

2ei(2α1+α2)x+(2ω1+ω2)t+2δ12 (46) and B2

(

x

,

t

)

=

1

+

A1eiα2x+ω2t+δ2

+

A2e2iα1x+2ω1t+2δ1

,

(47) where

ω

1

=

4

α

3 1

12u0

α

1

α

4

,

ω

2

=

−2

α

3 2

+

12u0

α

2

α

4

,

A2

=

α

2 3 8

α

12

(

2u0

α

1

)

.

(48)

If we consider the real-valued solution we get

|

u

(

x

,

t

)

|

2

=

H1

(

x

,

t

)

(

H2

(

x

,

t

))

2

,

(49) where H2

(

x

,

t

)

=

1

+

2 A12t+δ2cos

(

α

2x

)

+

2 A2e2ω1t+2δ1cos

(

2

α

1x

)

+

A21e2ω2t+2δ2

+

A22e4ω1t+4δ1

+

2 A1A2e(2ω1+ω2)t+2δ12cos

((

2

α

1

α

2

)

x

).

(50)

Here H1

(

x

,

t

)

is a huge expression so we are not giving it here explicitly. We will consider some particular cases.

(a).1) Let us consider the case when A1

=

0, u0

=

α

2 1

3

α2 1

4, and α3

=

0. The function H2

(

x

,

t

)

in the denominator of the solution (49) becomes

H2

(

x

,

t

)

= (

A2e2ω1t+2δ1

+

cos

(

2

α

1x

))

2

+

sin2

(

2

α

1x

).

(51) Therefore the solution (49) corresponding to this case is singular for x

=

2nαπ

1 and A2e

2ω1t+2δ1

+ (−

1

)

n

=

0, where n is

an integer.

Note that in addition to A1

=

0 if we take u0

=

α

2 1 3 yielding ω1

=

0, we have

|

u

(

x

,

t

)

|

2

=

H1

(

x

,

t

)

4 A22e4δ1

(

B

+

cos

(

2

α

1x

))

2

,

B

=

1

+

A2 2e4δ1 2 A2e2δ1

,

(52) where H1

(

x

,

t

)

=

1 9

α

4 1

(

A42e8δ1

+

1

)

+

α

32e2δ1

(

A22e4δ1

+

1

)

+

484 9

α

4 1A22e4δ1

+

2 9

α

4 1A22e4δ1cos

(

4

α

1x

)

+

2 A2e2δ1

(

α

32e2δ1

22 9

α

4 1

(

A22e4δ1

+

1

))

cos

(

2

α

1x

)

+

2 3

α

2 1

α

3A2e3δ1

(

A2e2δ1

1

)

sin

(

3

α

1x

)

+ (

2 3

α

2 1

α

31

(

A23e6δ1

1

)

+

44 3

α

2 1

α

3A2e3δ1

(

A2e2δ1

1

))

sin

(

α

1x

).

(53)

For B

>

1 or B

<

1 the solution (52) is nonsingular and bounded solution. Here if

1

B

1 the solution (52) is singular. Example3.

For this case choose the parameters as α

1

=

12

,

α

3

=

1

,

δ

1

=

0. This gives A2

= −

6. Hence solution of (24) becomes

|

u

(

x

,

t

)

|

2

=

24049

+

8040 cos

(

x

)

+

72 cos

(

2x

)

+

16968 sin

(

x

2

)

+

1008 sin

(

3 2x

)

144

(

37

12 cos

(

x

))

2

.

(54)

(7)

Fig. 3. Periodic wave solution for (24) with the parametersα1=123=1, δ1=0.

Fig. 4. Periodic wave solution for (24) with the parametersα1=12,A1=2, δ2=0.

(a).2) Let

us

now assume that α3

=

0 i.e. c

=

A2

=

0, and u0

=

α

2 2

6, A1

=

0. In this case the function H2

(

x

,

t

)

in the denominator of the solution (49) becomes

H2

(

x

,

t

)

= (

A12t+δ2

+

cos

(

α

2x

))

2

+

sin2

(

α

2x

).

(55) Therefore the solution (49) corresponding to this case is singular for x

=

nαπ

2 and A1

2t+δ2

+ (−

1

)

n

=

0, where n is

an integer.

Note that in addition to α3

=

0 if we also take u0

=

α

2 2

6

α2 1

4 i.e. ω2

=

0, the solution (49) turns to be

|

u

(

x

,

t

)

|

2

=

α

4 1

(

7

±

4

3

)

[

1

+

A41e4δ2

+

100 A2 1e2δ2

− (

20 A31e3δ2

+

20 A12

)

cos

(

α

1

(

3

±

3

)

x

)

+

2 A21e2δ2cos

(

2

α

1

(

3

±

3

)

x

)

]

[(

A12

+

cos

(

α

1

(

3

±

3

)

x

))

2

+

sin2

(

α

1

(

3

±

3

)

x

)

]

2

.

(56) The above solution is nonsingular and bounded if A12

<

1 or A12

>

1.

Example4.

Take α

1

=

12

,

α

2

=

12

(

3

+

3

),

A1

=

2

,

δ

2

=

0. Hence solution of (24) becomes

|

u

(

x

,

t

)

|

2

=

(

7

+

4

3

)

[

417

200 cos

(

12

(

3

+

3

)

x

)

+

8 cos

((

3

+

3

)

x

)

]

16

[

5

+

4 cos

(

12

(

3

+

3

)

x

)

]

2

.

(57)

The above solution is a nonsingular and bounded periodic wave solution. The graph of this solution is given in Fig.4. (b)T-reversalnonlocalcomplexKdVequation:

According to the constraints (40) and (41) with a

= ¯

a

ε

1

ε

2 and (44), since

(

ε

1

,

ε

2

)

= (

1

,

1

)

here we have k1

= ¯

k1 and a

= −¯

a. Let

c

=

i

α

1 and a

=

i

α

2for αj

,

j

=

1

,

2

,

∈ R

yielding

ω

1

=

i

(

4k31

+

12u0k1

)

α

2

=

i

α

3

,

ω

2

=

i

(

2k31

+

12u0k1

)

α

2

=

i

α

4

,

A2

= −

α

12 8k21

(

k21

+

2u0

)

.

(58)

Therefore we obtain the one-soliton solution of the T-reversal nonlocal complex equation (25) as u

(

x

,

t

)

=

u0

+

B1

(

x

,

t

)

(

B2

(

x

,

t

))

2

(8)

Fig. 5. One-soliton solution for (25) with the parameters k1=16,k2=16(3+ √ 3),A1=1, δ2=0. where B1

(

x

,

t

)

=

i

α

1

(

ek1x+3t+δ1

+

A1e(k1+k2)x+i(α3+α4)t+δ12

+

A2e3k1x+3iα3t+3δ1

)

+

2k22A1ek2x+4t+δ2

+

8k21A2e2k1x+2iα3t+2δ1

+

2 A1A2

(

2k1

k2

)

2e(2k1+k2)x+i(2α3+α4)t+2δ12 (60) and B2

(

x

,

t

)

=

1

+

A1ek2x+4t+δ2

+

A2e2k1x+2iα3t+2δ1

.

(61) Let us consider the real-valued solution

|

u

(

x

,

t

)

|

2. We have

|

u

(

x

,

t

)

|

2

=

H1

(

x

,

t

)

(

H2

(

x

,

t

))

2

,

(62) where H2

(

x

,

t

)

=

1

+

2 A2e2k1x+2δ1cos

(

2

α

3t

)

+

2 A1ek2x+δ2cos

(

α

4t

)

+

A21e2k2x+2δ2

+

A22e4k1x+4δ1

+

2 A1A2e(2k1+k2)x+2δ12cos

((

2

α

3

α

4

)

t

).

(63)

Here again H1

(

x

,

t

)

is a huge expression so we are not expressing it here. Let us consider two particular cases.

(b).1) Take

α

1

=

0 yielding A2

=

c

=

0, and u0

= −

k2 2

6 giving α4

=

0. Note that in this case k2

= (

3

±

3

)

k1. The solution (62) becomes

|

u

(

x

,

t

)

|

2

=

k 4 1

(

7

±

4

3

)

[

1

20 A1e(3± √ 3)k1x+δ2

+

102 A2 1e2(3± √ 3)k1x+2δ2

20 A3 1e3(3± √ 3)k1x+3δ2

+

A4 1e4(3± √ 3)k1x+4δ2

]

[

A1e(3± √ 3)k1x+δ2

+

1

]

4

.

(64)

The above solution is nonsingular and bounded for A1

>

0.

Example5.

Take the parameters as

k1

=

16

,

k2

=

16

(

3

+

3

),

A1

=

1

,

δ

2

=

0. Hence one-soliton solution of (25) becomes

|

u

(

x

,

t

)

|

2

=

(

7

+

4

3

)

[

e23(3+

3)x

20e12(3+√3)x

+

102e13(3+√3)x

20e61(3+√3)x

]

1296

(

e16(3+

3)x

+

1

)

4

.

(65)

The above solution is a nonsingular and bounded solution. The graph of this solution is given in Fig.5. (b).2) Choose

now α

3

=

0 that is u0

= −

k

2 1

3 and α1

=

0 yielding A2

=

c

=

0. In this case k2

= (

1

±

1

3

)

k1. Take the plus sign for k2. The solution (62) becomes

|

u

(

x

,

t

)

|

2

=

H1

(

x

,

t

)

9

[(

A1e (1+1 3)k1x+δ2

+

cos

(

α

4t

))

2

+

sin2

(

α

4t

)

]

2

,

(66) where H1

(

x

,

t

)

=

k41

[

1

+

A41e 4k1(1+√13)k1x+4δ2

+

12 A21

(

7

+

4

3

)

e2k1(1+ 1 √ 3)k1x+2δ2

+

2 A2 1e 2k1(1+√13)k1x+2δ2 cos

(

2

α

4t

)

4 A1

(

3

+

2

3

)(

e3k1(1+√13)k1x+3δ2

+

A2 1e k1(1+√13)k1x+δ2

)

cos

(

α

4t

)

].

(67)

(9)

Fig. 6. Periodic wave solution for (26) with the parametersα1=12, u0=2,δ2=0, A1= −4, a=4. Here α4

= −

8k3 1 √ 3

9α2 . The above solution is singular for A1e

k2x+δ2

+ (−

1

)

n

=

0 at t

=

α4, where n is

an integer.

(c)ST-reversalnonlocalcomplexKdVequation:

In this case according to the constraints (40) and (41) with a

= ¯

a

ε

1

ε

2 and (44), since

(

ε

1

,

ε

2

)

= (−

1

,

1

)

we have k1

= −¯

k1 and a

= ¯

a. Let k1

=

i

α

1, k2

=

i

α

1

(

1

±



1

+

4u0 α2 1

)

=

i

α

2, c

=

i

α

3 for αj

,

j

=

1

,

2

,

3

∈ R

yielding

ω

1

=

i

(

4

α

13

12u0

α

1

)

a

=

i

α

4

,

ω

2

=

i

(

2

α

23

+

12u0

α

2

)

a

=

i

α

5

,

A2

=

α

2 3 8

α

2 1

(

2u0

α

12

)

.

(68)

Therefore we obtain the one-soliton solution of the ST-reversal nonlocal complex equation (26) as u

(

x

,

t

)

=

u0

+

B1

(

x

,

t

)

(

B2

(

x

,

t

))

2

,

(69) where B1

(

x

,

t

)

=

i

α

3

(

eiα1x+4t+δ1

+

A1ei(α1+α2)x+i(α4+α5)t+δ12

+

A2e3iα1x+3iα4t+3δ1

)

+

2 A1k22eiα2x+5t+δ2

+

8k21A2e2iα1x+2iα4t+2δ1

2 A1A2

(

2

α

1

α

2

)

2ei(2α1+α2)x+i(2α4+α5)t+2δ12 (70) and B2

(

x

,

t

)

=

1

+

A1eiα2x+5t+δ2

+

A2e2iα1x+2iα4t+2δ1

.

(71) When we consider the real-valued solution

|

u

(

x

,

t

)

|

2 we get

|

u

(

x

,

t

)

|

2

=

H1

(

x

,

t

)

(

H2

(

x

,

t

))

2

,

(72) where H2

(

x

,

t

)

=

1

+

2 A2e2δ1cos

(

2

α

1x

+

2

α

4t

)

+

2 A12cos

(

α

2x

+

α

5t

)

+

A21e2δ2

+

A22e4δ1

+

2 A1A2e2δ12cos

((

2

α

1

α

2

)

x

+ (

2

α

4

α

5

)

t

).

(73)

Here also H1

(

x

,

t

)

is a huge expression so we are not giving it here explicitly. We will deal with some particular cases.

(c).1) Consider

the case when α

3

=

0 yielding A2

=

0. Take also A1

=

0. In this case the solution (72) of the nonlocal complex equation (26) becomes

|

u

(

x

,

t

)

|

2

=

4u0A1

(

u0

α

2 2

)

2

(

1

+

A21e2δ2

)

cos

(

α

2x

+

α

5t

)

+

2u20A21e2δ2cos

(

2

α

2x

+

2

α

5t

)

+

4 A21e2δ2

(

u0

α

22

)

2

[(

A12

+

cos

(

α

2x

+

α

5t

))

2

+

sin2

(

α

2x

+

α

5t

)

]

2

.

(74)

This solution is nonsingular and bounded if A12

>

1 or A12

<

1. When these conditions are relaxed the solution (74) may develop singularity in a finite time.

Example6.

Take the parameters of the solution (

74) as α1

=

12, u0

=

2,

δ

2

=

0, A1

= −

4, and a

=

4. Hence the solution (74) turns to be

|

u

(

x

,

t

)

|

2

=

1284

64

(

1

+

31

)

2

+

4

(

1

+

31

)

4

+ (

136

(

1

+

31

)

2

1088

)

cos

(ψ )

+

128 cos

(

2

ψ )

[

17

8 cos

(ψ )

]

2

,

(75)

where

ψ

=

12

(

1

+

31

)

x

+ (

3

(

1

+

31

)

161

(

1

+

31

)

3

)

t. This is a nonsingular and bounded periodic wave solution. The graph of the above solution is given in Fig.6.

(10)

Fig. 7. Periodic wave solution for (26) with the parametersα1=12,u0=2, δ1=03=5,a=4.

(c).2) Here

we again consider a particular case. Take

A1

=

0 and A2

=

0. Therefore the solution (72) of the nonlocal complex equation (26) becomes

|

u

(

x

,

t

)

|

2

=

H1

(

x

,

t

)

[(

A2e2δ1

+

cos

(

2

α

1x

+

2

α

4t

))

2

+

sin2

(

2

α

1x

+

2

α

4t

)

]

2

,

(76) where H1

(

x

,

t

)

=

2

α

31

[2u

0A2e2δ1

u0

2u0A22e4δ1

+

u0A32e6δ1

8 A2

α

12e2δ1

+

8 A22

α

12e4δ1

]sin

(

α

1x

+

α

4t

)

+

2e2δ1A 2

[

2u20

8u0

α

21

+

α

32e2δ1

+

2u20A22e4δ1

8u0A22

α

21e4δ1

]

cos

(

2

α

1x

+

2

α

4t

)

+

2u0

α

3A2e3δ1

[

A2e2δ1

1

]

sin

(

3

α

1x

+

3

α

4t

)

+

2u20A22e4δ1cos

(

4

α

1x

+

4

α

4t

)

+

u20

+

e2δ1

[

α

2 3

+

64 A22

α

14e2δ1

32u0A22

α

12e2δ1

+

4u20A22e2δ1

+

α

23A22e4δ1

+

u20A42e6δ1

].

(77) This solution is nonsingular and bounded if A2e2δ1

>

1 or A2e2δ1

<

1. When these conditions are relaxed the solution (76) may develop singularity in a finite time.

Example7.

Choose the parameters of the solution (

76) as α1

=

12

,

u0

=

2

,

δ

1

=

0

,

α

3

=

5

,

a

=

4. Therefore the solution (76) becomes

|

u

(

x

,

t

)

|

2

=

68449

+

45780 sin

(

1

2x

238t

)

+

12600 sin

(

32x

698t

)

+

39660 cos

(

x

234t

)

+

7200 cos

(

2x

232t

)

(

60 cos

(

x

234t

)

+

109

)

2

.

(78)

The above solution is a nonsingular and bounded periodic wave solution. The graph of this solution is given in Fig.7. 5. Conclusion

In this work, we have studied local and nonlocal integrable reductions of the symmetrical HS system. The local reductions yield KdV and complex KdV equations. The nonlocal reductions of the HS system give several type of new integrable nonlocal KdV equations. These are time (T)-, space (S)-, and space-time (ST)-reversal nonlocal complex KdV equations and space-time (ST)-reversal nonlocal KdV equation. By using the one-soliton solution of the HS system and the reduction formulas we obtained the one-soliton solutions of the reduced local and nonlocal KdV equations. Using our approach one can find also two- and three-soliton solutions of these KdV equations.

CRediTauthorshipcontributionstatement

Metin Gürses: Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, Conducting, Visualization, Writing-Review and Editing. Aslı Pekcan: Methodology, Validation, Formal Analysis, Writing-original draft, Writing-Review and Editing.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. Declarationofcompetinginterest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

(11)

References

[1]M.J.Ablowitz,Z.H.Musslimani,IntegrablenonlocalnonlinearSchrödingerequation,Phys.Rev.Lett.110(2013)064105.

[2]M.J.Ablowitz,Z.H.Musslimani,InversescatteringtransformfortheintegrablenonlocalnonlinearSchrödingerequation,Nonlinearity29(2016)915–946.

[3]M.J.Ablowitz,Z.H.Musslimani,Integrablenonlocalnonlinearequations,Stud.Appl.Math.139 (1)(2016)7–59.

[4]K.Chen,X.Deng,S.Lou,D.Zhang,SolutionsoflocalandnonlocalequationsreducedfromtheAKNShierarchy,Stud.Appl.Math.141 (1)(2018)113–141.

[5]B.F.Feng,X.D.Luo,M.J.Ablowitz,Z.H.Musslimani,GeneralsolitonsolutiontoanonlocalnonlinearSchrödingerequationwithzeroandnonzeroboundaryconditions, Nonlinearity31 (12)(2018)5385–5409.

[6]V.S.Gerdjikov,A.Saxena,CompleteintegrabilityofnonlocalnonlinearSchrödingerequation,J.Math.Phys.58 (1)(2017)013502.

[7]M.Gürses,A.Pekcan,NonlocalnonlinearSchrödingerequationsandtheirsolitonsolutions,J.Math.Phys.59(2018)051501.

[8]M.Gürses,A.Pekcan,Integrablenonlocalreductions,in:V.G.Kac,P.J.Olver,P.Winternitz,T.Ozer(Eds.),Symmetries,DifferentialEquationsandApplicationsSDEA-III, Istanbul,Turkey,August2017,in:SpringerProceedingsinMathematicsandStatistics,vol. 266,2018,pp. 27–52.

[9]X.Huang,L.Ling,SolitonsolutionsforthenonlocalnonlinearSchrödingerequation,Eur.Phys.J.Plus131(2016)148.

[10]M.Li,T.Xu,DarkandantidarksolitoninteractionsinthenonlocalnonlinearSchrödingerequationwiththeself-inducedparity-time-symmetricpotential,Phys.Rev.E 91(2015)033202.

[11]M.J.Ablowitz,B.F.Feng,X.D.Luo,Z.H.Musslimani,Inversescatteringtransformforthenonlocalreversespace-timenonlinearSchrödingerequation,Theor.Math.Phys. 196 (3)(2018)1241–1267.

[12]X.Y.Wen,Z.Yan,Y. Yang,Dynamicsofhigher-orderrationalsolitonsforthenonlocalnonlinearSchrödingerequationwith theself-inducedparity-time-symmetric potential,Chaos26(2015)063123.

[13]A.Khare,A.Saxena,Periodicandhyperbolicsolitonsolutionsofanumberofnonlocalnonlinearequations,J.Math.Phys.56(2015)032104.

[14]J.Yang,GeneralN-solitonsandtheirdynamicsinseveralnonlocalnonlinearSchrödingerequations,Phys.Lett.A383 (4)(2019)328–337.

[15]M.Gürses,A.Pekcan,NonlocalnonlinearmodifiedKdVequationsandtheirsolitonsolutions,Commun.NonlinearSci.Numer.Simul.67(2019)427.

[16]J.L.Ji,Z.N.Zhu,OnanonlocalmodifiedKorteweg-deVriesequation:integrability,Darbouxtransformationandsolitonsolutions,Commun.NonlinearSci.Numer.Simul. 42(2017)699.

[17]J.L.Ji,Z.N.Zhu,SolitonsolutionsofanintegrablenonlocalmodifiedKorteweg-deVriesequationthroughinversescatteringtransform,J.Math.Anal.Appl.453(2017) 973.

[18]L.Y.Ma,S.F.Shen,Z.N.Zhu,SolitonsolutionandgaugeequivalenceforanintegrablenonlocalcomplexmodifiedKorteweg-deVriesequation,J.Math.Phys.58(2017) 103501.

[19]M.J.Ablowitz,B.F.Feng,X.D.Luo,Z.H.Musslimani,Reversespace-timenonlocalsine-Gordon/sinh-Gordonequationswithnonzeroboundaryconditions,Stud.Appl.Math. 141 (3)(2018)267–307.

[20]A.S.Fokas,IntegrablemultidimensionalversionsofthenonlocalSchrödingerequation,Nonlinearity29(2016)319.

[21]J.Rao,Y.Zhang,A.S.Fokas,J.He,RoguewavesofthenonlocalDavey-StewartsonIequation,Nonlinearity31(2018)4090–4107.

[22]T.Xu,M.Li,Y.Huang,Y.Chen,C.Yu,NonsingularlocalizedwavesolutionsforthenonlocalDavey-StewartsonIequationwithzerobackground,Mod.Phys.Lett.B31 (35) (2017)1750338.

[23]Z.-X.Zhou,DarbouxtransformationsglobalexplicitsolutionsfornonlocalDavey-StewartsonIequation,Stud.Appl.Math.141 (2)(2018)186–204.

[24]Y.Zhang,Y.Liu,BreatherandlumpsolutionsfornonlocalDavey-StewartsonIIequation,NonlinearDyn.96(2019)107–113.

[25]M.Gürses,NonlocalFordy-Kulishequationsonsymmetricspaces,Phys.Lett.A381(2017)1791.

[26]V.S.Gerdjikov,G.G.Grahovski,R.I.Ivanov,OntheN-waveequationswithPTsymmetry,Theor.Math.Phys.188 (3)(2016)1305.

[27]D.Sinha,P.K.Ghosh,IntegrablenonlocalvectornonlinearSchrödingerequationwithself-inducedparity-timesymmetricpotential,Phys.Lett.A381(2017)124.

[28]Z.Yan,IntegrablePT-symmetriclocalandnonlocalvectornonlinearSchrödingerequations:aunifiedtwoparametermodel,Appl.Math.Lett.47(2015)61.

[29]V.S.Gerdjikov,G.G.Grahovski,R.I.Ivanov,OnintegrablewaveinteractionsandLaxpairsonsymmetricspaces,WaveMotion71(2017)53.

[30]V.S.Gerdjikov,OnnonlocalmodelsofKulish-SklyanintypeandgeneralizedFouriertransforms,Stud.Comput.Intell.681(2017)37.

[31]M.Gürses,A.Pekcan,(2+1)-dimensionallocalandnonlocalreductionsofthenegativeAKNSsystem:solitonsolutions,Commun.NonlinearSci.Numer.Simul.71(2019) 161–173.

[32]A.Pekcan,NonlocalcoupledHI-MKdVsystems,Commun.NonlinearSci.Numer.Simul.72(2019)493–515.

[33]M.Gürses,A.Pekcan,K.Zheltukhin,Nonlocalhydrodynamictypeofequations,Commun.NonlinearSci.Numer.Simul.85(2020)105242.

[34]M.Gürses,A.Pekcan,K.Zheltukhin,Discretesymmetriesandnonlocalreductions,Phys.Lett.A384(2020)120065.

[35]V.Caudrelier,InterplaybetweentheinversescatteringmethodandFokas’sunifiedtransformwithanapplication,Stud.Appl.Math.140(2017)3.

[36]B.Yang,J.Yang,Transformationsbetweennonlocalandlocalintegrableequations,Stud.Appl.Math.140(2017)178.

[37]R.Hirota,J.Satsuma,SolitonsolutionsofthecoupledKorteweg-deVriesequation,Phys.Lett.A85 (8–9)(1981)407–408.

[38]R.Dodd,A.Fordy,OntheintegrabilityofasystemofcoupledKdVequations,Phys.Lett.A89 (4)(1982)168–170.

[39]R.N.Aiyer,RecursionoperatorforcoupledKdVequation,Phys.Lett.A93 (8)(1983)368–370.

[40]R.N.Aiyer,Factorizationofthe2×2 matrixrecursionoperatorofthecoupledKdVequation,J.Math.Phys.25(1984)3227–3230.

[41]W.Oevel,OntheintegrabilityoftheHirota-Satsumasystem,Phys.Lett.A94 (9)(1983)404–407.

[42]D.Levi,AhierarchyofcoupledKorteweg-deVriesequations,Phys.Lett.A95 (1)(1983)7–10.

[43]A.Ramani,B.Dorizzi,B.Grammaticos,IntegrabilityoftheHirota-Satsumaequations:twotests,Phys.Lett.A99 (9)(1983)411–414.

[44]P.K.H.Gragert,R.Martini,TheexplicitstructureoftheprolongationalgebraoftheHirota-Satsumasystem,Phys.Lett.A101 (9)(1984)469–472.

[45]M.Gürses,A.Karasu,IntegrablecoupledKdVsystems,J.Math.Phys.39 (4)(1998)2103–2111.

[46]M.Gürses,A.Karasu,V.Sokolov,OntheconstructionofrecursionoperatorfromLaxrepresentation,J.Math.Phys.39 (4)(1999)6473–6490.

[47]H.W.Tam,W.X.Ma,X.B.Hu,D.L.Wang,TheHirota-SatsumacoupledKdVequationandacoupledItosystemrevisited,J.Phys.Soc.Jpn.69 (1)(2000)45–52.

[48]A.R.Chowdhury,S.Basak,OnthecompletesolutionoftheHirota-Satsumasystemthroughthe‘dressing’operatortechnique,J.Phys.A,Math.Gen.17(1984)L863–L868.

[49]H.C.Hu,Q.P.Liu,NewDarbouxtransformationforHirota-SatsumacoupledKdVsystem,ChaosSolitonsFractals17(2003)921–928.

[50]H.C.Hu,Y.Liu,Newpositon,negatonandcomplexitonsolutionsfortheHirota-SatsumacoupledKdVsystem,Phys.Lett.A372(2008)5795–5798.

[51]L.Sen-Yue,T.Xiao-Yan,L.Ji,ExactsolutionsofthecoupledKdVsystemviaaformallyvariableseparationapproach,Commun.Theor.Phys.36(2001)145–148.

[52]J.Satsuma,R.Hirota,AcoupledKdVequationsisonecaseofthefour-reductionoftheKPhierarchy,J.Phys.Soc.Jpn.51 (10)(1982)3390–3397.

[53]V.G.Drinfeld,V.V.Sokolov,Newevolutionaryequationspossessingan(L,A)-pairpartialdifferentialequations,in:Proc.S.L.SobolevSeminar,No.2,Inst.ofMath.,Siberian BranchoftheUSSRAcad.Sci.,Novosibirsk,1981(inRussian).

[54]S.Yu.Sakovich,CoupledKdVequationsofHirota-Satsumatype,J.NonlinearMath.Phys.6 (3)(1999)255–262.

[55]S.Yu.Sakovich,Addentumto:“CoupledKdVequationsofHirota-Satsumatype”,J.NonlinearMath.Phys.6 (3)(1999)255–262,J.NonlinearMath.Phys.8 (2)(2001) 311–312.

[56]Z.Popowicz,ThegeneralizedHarryDymequation,Phys.Lett.A317 (3–4)(2003)260–264.

Şekil

Fig. 1. One-soliton solution for (21) with the parameters k 1 = 1 2 , u 0 = − 1 , α = a = A 1 = 1 , δ 1 = δ 2 = 0.
Fig. 2. One-soliton solution for (22) with the parameters k 2 = 2 , u 0 = − 1 , a = 8.
Fig. 4. Periodic wave solution for (24) with the parameters α 1 = 1 2 , A 1 = 2 , δ 2 = 0.
Fig. 5. One-soliton solution for (25) with the parameters k 1 = 1 6 , k 2 = 1 6 ( 3 + √ 3 ), A 1 = 1 , δ 2 = 0
+3

Referanslar

Benzer Belgeler

In Chapter 2, a nonlocal boundary value problem was studied for unique the solution belonging to the class [ ] ( That is has a continuous fourth derivative on the

In this thesis, we discussed the Series Methods like Adomian Method, Variational Iteration Method and Homotopy Perturbation Methods, and Solitary Methods such as

As reßected in the dis- trict of Amasya, where the malikane-divani type of revenue-holding system was in force, Mehmed II’s reform seems to have been rather superÞcial; most of

across the InGaN/GaN MQWs region for the reference device and the NPNPN-GaN device, respectively. The NPNPN-GaN junctions can also reduce the current crowding and thus promote the

Işıloğlu, “Malatya ili ve çevresinde yetişen yenen ve zehirli mantarlar üzerinde taksonomik araştırmalar,” Yüksek lisans tezi, Biyoloji Bölümü, Fen Bilimleri

In the literature, there have been a number of works comparing solutions of a parent equation with those of a model equation describing the unidirectional propagation of long

In [7] the authors have proved the convergence of the semi-discrete pseudospectral Fourier method and they have tested their method on two problems: propagation of a single

Erkip, Global existence and blow-up of solutions for a general class of doubly dispersive nonlocal nonlinear wave equations, Nonlinear Anal.. Boussinesq, Theorie des ondes et des