5.2. Öneriler 106
5.2.2. Yapılabilecek Araştırmalara Yönelik Öneriler 106
1. Araştırmacının gözlemleri ve öğrencilerin görüşlerinden çıkarılan farklı bağımlı değişken olarak bilişsel yük algısının ölçülmesi önemli görülmektedir. Kullanılan araç sayısının artması bilişsel yük algısı üzerinde nasıl etkilidir? sorusuna cevap aranması önemli görülmektedir.
2. Öğrencilerin süreç öncesinde yapmış oldukları seçimler zaman içerisinde değişiklik gösterebileceği gözlenmiştir. Bu nedenle etkileşim araçlarının zamanla öğrencilerin kullanım durumlarına göre değişmesini sağlayan uyarlanabilir (adaptive) bir öğrenme ortamının oluşturulması ve değişkenler üzerinde ki etkisinin araştırılması önerilmektedir.
3. Öğrencilerin çevrimiçi öğrenme ortamına ilişkin güdülenme ve işbirlikli çalışmaya yönelik algılarının kontrol değişkeni olarak alınması önerilmektedir.
KAYNAKÇA
Alessi, S.M., & Trollip, S.R. (2001). Multimedia for learning: Methods and Development, ( 3rded.) Allyn & Bacon,Massachusetts.
Alomyan, H. (2004). Individual differences: implications for web-based learning design. International Journal of Education, 4(4), pp. 188-196.
Anderson, T. (2003). Modes of interaction in distance education: Recent developments and research questions. In M.G. Moore (Ed.) Handbook of Distance Education, pp. 129-144. Mahwah, NJ.: Erlbaum.
Anderson, T., & Kuskis, A. (2007). Modes of interaction. In M.G. Moore (Ed.), Handbook of distance education, 2nd ed., pp. 295-309. Mahwah, NJ.: Erlbaum.
Antonietti, A., & Giorgetti, M. (2006). Teachers’ beliefs about learning from multimedia. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(2), pp. 267-282.
Arbaugh, J. B. (2001). How instructor immediacy behaviors affect student satisfaction and learning in web-based courses. Business Communication Quarterly, 64(4), pp. 42-54.
Asan, A. (2003). School experience course with multimedia in teacher education: An example from Turkey. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19(1), pp. 21- 34.
Bannan-Ritland, B. (2002). Computer-mediated communication (CMC), e-learning and interactivity: A review of the research. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 3(2), pp. 161-179.
Battalio, J. (2007). Interaction online: a reevaluation. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 8(4), pp. 339-352.
Beauvois, M. H. (1998). Conversation in slow motion: computer-mediated communication in the foreign language classroom. The Canadian Modern Language Journal, 54(2), pp. 198–217.
Bender, T. (2003). Discussion-based online teaching to enhance student learning: Theory, practice and assessment. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.
Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Borokhovski, E., Wade, C. A., Tamim, R. M., Surkes, M. A., & Bethel, E. C. (2009). A meta-analysis of three types of interaction treatments in distance education. Review of Educational Research, 79(3), pp. 1243-1289.
Bolliger, D., & Martindale, T. (2004). Key factors for determining student satisfaction in online courses. International Journal on E-Learning, 3(1) , pp. 61-67.
Bonk, C. J., Hansen, E. J., Grabner-Hagen, M. M., Lazar, S. A., & Mirabelli, C. (1998). Time to ‘‘Connect’’: synchronous and asynchronous case-based dialogue among preservice teachers. In C. J. Bonk & K. S. King (Eds.), Electronic Collaborators: Learner-Centered Technologies for Literacy, Apprenticeship, and Discours, pp. 289-314. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bouhnik, D., & Marcus, T. (2006). Interaction in distance-learning courses. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(3), pp. 299-305.
Brahmawong, C. (2004). Guidelines for Internet-based distance education in colleges and universities in Thailand. International Journal of the Computer, the Internet and Management, 12(2), pp. 7-13.
Brown, R. E. (2001). The process of community-building in distance learning classes. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2), pp. 18-35.
Buboltz, W., Young, T., & Wilkinson, L. (2003). Online behavior and personality correlates of technological use. In C. Crawford et al. (Eds.). Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2003, pp. 1142-1144. Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
Bulterman D.C.A., Rutledge L., Hardman L., & Van Ossenbruggen J. (1999). Supporting adaptive and adaptable hypermedia presentation semantics. The 8th IFIP 2.6 Working Conference on Database Semantics (DS-8). Semantic Issues in Multimedia Systems. January 5-8.
Chen, S. Y. (2005). Evaluating the learning effectiveness of using Web-based instruction: An individual differences approach. International Journal of Information & Communication Technology Education, 1(1), pp. 69-82.
Chen, S., & Caropreso, E. (2004). How does personality influence collaborative online discussion?. In R. Ferdig et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2004, pp. 2844-2851. Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
Chen, S. Y., & Macredie, R. D. (2004). Cognitive modelling of student learning in web-based instructional programmes. International Journal of Human- Computer Interaction, 17(3), pp. 375-402.
Chou, C. C. (2002). A comparative content analysis of student interaction in synchronous and asynchronous learning networks. In: Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii.
Chou, H., & Wang, T. (2000). The influence of learning style and training method on self-efficacy and learning performance in WWW homepage design training. International Journal of Information Management, 20(6), pp. 455-472.
Davidson-Shivers, G. V., Muilenburg, L. Y., & Tanner, E. J. (2001). How do students participate in synchronous and asynchronous online discussions?. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 25(4), pp. 351-366.
Davies, J., & Graff, M. (2005). Performance in e-learning: online participation and student grades. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(4), pp. 657- 663.
De Bra, P. (1999). Design issues in adaptive hypermedia application development, Brusilovsky, P., & De Bra, P.,(Eds.), Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Adaptive Systems and User Modeling on the World Wide Web, pp. 29-39, Toronto and Banff, Canada.
De Bra, P., Houben, G. J., & Wu, H. (1999). AHAM: A Dexter-based Reference Model for Adaptive Hypermedia. In: Proceedings of the 10th ACM conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia, Darmstadt, Germany, February 21-25, pp. 147-156.
DeLoach, S. B., & Greenlaw, S. A. (2007). Effectively moderating electronic discussions. The Journal of Economic Education, 38(4), pp. 419-434.
Edwards, J. T. (2009). Undergraduate students’ perceptions and preferences of computer-mediated communication with faculty. American Communication Journal, 11(1).
Fisher, M. D. (2003). Designing courses and teaching on the web. Lanham, Maryland: Scarecrow Education.
Fredericksen, E., Pickett, A., Shea, P., Pelz, W., & Swan, K. (2000). Student satisfaction and perceived learning with on-line courses: Principles and examples from the SUNY learning network. On-Line Education: Learning Effectiveness and Faculty Satisfaction. The Center for Asynchronous Learning Networks, Nashville.
Garrison, D. R. (2000). Theoretical challenges for distance education in the 21st century: A shift from structural to transactional issues. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 1(1).
Garrison, R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (1999). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education, The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2/3), pp. 87-105.
Giesbers, B., Rienties, B., Gijselaers, W. H., Segers, M., & Tempelaar, D. T. (2009). Social presence, web-videoconferencing and learning in virtual teams. Industry and Higher Education, 23(4), pp. 301-310.
Gilbert, L., & Moore, D. R. (1998). Building interactivity into Web courses: Tools for social and instructional interaction. Educational Technology, 38(3), pp. 29-35.
Goertler, S. (2009). Using computer‐mediated communication (cmc) in language teaching. Die Unterrichtspraxis/Teaching German, 42(1), pp. 74-84.
Gonzales, C. L., & deMontes, L. S. (2001). Effective practices in distance education. Computers in the Schools, 18(2/3), pp. 61-77.
Gosmire, D., Morrison, M., & Van Osdel, J. (2009). Perceptions of interactions in online courses. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 5(4). Gunawardena, C. N. (1995). Social presence theory and implications for interaction
and collaborative learning in computer conferences. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 1(2/3), pp. 147-166. Charlottesville, VA: AACE.
Gunawardena, C. N., & McIsaac, M. S. (2004). Distance education. In: D. Jonassen, Editor, Handbook of research for educational communications and technology, 2nd ed., Association for Educational Communications & Technology, Bloomington, pp. 355-395.
Gunawardena, C. N., & Zittle, F. (1997). Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer mediated conferencing environment. The American Journal of Distance Education, 11(3), pp. 8-25.
Hannafin, M. J. (1989). Interaction strategies and emerging instructional technologies: Psychological perspectives. Canadian Journal of Educational Communication, 18(3), pp. 167-179.
Haythornthwaite, C. (2000). Online personal networks: size, composition and media use among distance learners. New Media and Society, 2(2), pp. 195-225. Haythornthwaite, C. (2001) Exploring multiplexity: social network structures in a
computer-supported distance learning class. The Information Society, 17(3), pp. 211-226.
Higgs, B., & McCarthy, M. (2005). Active learning–from lecture theatre to field- work. In G. O’Neill, S. Moore, & B. McMullin (Eds.), Emerging issues in the practice of university learning and teaching, pp. 37-44. Dublin: All Ireland Society for Higher Education.
Hill, J. R., Wiley, D., Nelson, L. M., & Han, S. (2003). Exploring research on Internet-based learning: From infrastructure to interactions. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology, pp. 433-460. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Hillman, D. C. A., Willis, D. J., & Gunawardena, C. N. (1994). Learner-interface interaction in distance education: An extension of contemporary models and strategies for practitioners. The American Journal of Distance Education, 8(2), pp. 30-42.
Hirumi, A. (2002). The design and sequencing of e-learning interactions: A grounded approach. International Journal on E-learning, 1(1), pp. 19-27.
Hirumi, A. (2006). Analyzing and designing e-learning interactions. In C. Juwah (Ed.). Interactions in online education :Implications for theory and practice, pp. 46-71. Routledge Publishing, New York.
Holmberg, B. (2003). A theory of distance education based on empathy. In M. G. Moore & W. G. Anderson (Eds.). Handbook of distance education, pp. 79-86. Mahwah, HJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hornik, S., & Tupchiy, A. (2006). Culture’s impact on technology mediated learning: The role of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism. Journal of Global Information Management, 14(4), pp. 31-56.
Horton, W., & Horton, K. (2003). E-learning tools and technologies, New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Hrastinski, S. (2007). Using chat as a complement to discussion board in small-group online seminars: How is student participation affected?. International Journal of Knowledge and Learning, 3(5-6).
Hrastinski, S. (2008). The potential of synchronous communication to enhance participation in online discussions: A case study of two e-learning courses. Information and Management, 45(7), pp. 499-506.
Ingram, A. L., Hathorn, L. G., & Evans. A. (2000). Beyond chat on the Internet. Computers and Education, 35(1), pp. 21-35.
Jin, S. H. (2005). Analyzing student–student and student–instructor interaction through multiple communication tools in web-based learning. International Journal of Instructional Media, 32(1), pp. 59-69.
Johnson, G. M., & Johnson, J. A. (2006). Personality, Internet experience, and e- communication preference. In P. Isaias, M. B. Nunes, & I. J. Martinez (Eds.), Proceedings of the IADIS International Conference WWW/Internet 2006, Vol. 1, pp. 55-62. Murcia, Spain: IADIS Press.
Johnson, M. M., & Huff, M. T. (2000). Students’ use of computer-mediated communication in a distance education course. Research on Social Work Practice, 10(4), pp. 519-532.
Johnson, R. D., Hornik, S., & Salas, E. (2008). An empirical examination of factors contributing to the creation of successful e-learning environments. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 66(5), pp. 356-369.
Jung, I. (2001). Building a theoretical framework of web-based instruction in the context of distance education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32(5), pp. 525-534.
Kane, T., & Baggaley, J. (2002). Online learners’ interest in collaborative tools. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 2(2). Kang, M., Choi, H., & Park, S. (2007). Construction and validation of a social
presence scale for measuring online learners’ involvement. In C. Montgomerie & J. Seale (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2007, pp. 1829-1833. Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
Koch, N. (2001). Software Engineering for Adaptive Hypermedia Systems: Reference Model, Modeling Techniques and Development Process. Doctoral Thesis, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Germany.
Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P.A., Jochems, W., & Van Buuren, H. (2004). Measuring perceived quality of social space in distributed learning groups. Computers in Human Behavior, 20(5), pp. 607-632.
Kurhila, J. (2003). Considering Individual Differences in Computer-Supported Special and Elementary Education. Doctoral Thesis, University of Helsinki. Kuzgun, Y. ve Deryakulu, D. (2004). Bireysel farklılıklar ve eğitime yansımaları.
Kuzgun, Y. ve Deryakulu, D. (Ed.), Eğitimde Bireysel Farklılıklar, Ankara: Nobel Dağıtım, ss. 1-11.
Küçük, M. (2010). Çevrimiçi öğrenenlerin öğrenme biçimi, öğrenme stratejileri ve eşzamansız tartışmalara katılımları arasındaki ilişki. Doktora Tezi, Anadolu Üniversitesi.
Le, T., & Le, Q. (2002). The nature of learners’ email communication. Proceedings of the International Conference on Computers in Education, vol 1, 12/3/02– 12/6/02 (pp. 468−471). Auckland, New Zealand.
Lightfoot, J. M. (2006). A comparative analysis of e-mail and face-to-face communication in an educational environment. The Internet And Higher Education, 9(3), pp. 217-227.
Lu Y., Huang, W., Ma, H., & Luce, T. (2007). Interaction, social presence in technology mediated learning: - A partial least square model. Proceedings of International Conference on Wireless Communication, Networking, Mobile Computing, WiCOM Management Track: Information System and Management, Shanghai, China.
Mabrito, M. (2006). A study of synchronous versus asynchronous collaboration in an online business writing class, The American Journal of Distance Education 20(2), pp. 93-107.
Martyn, M. A. (2005). Using interaction in online discussion boards. Educause Quarterly, 4, pp. 61-62.
McCombs B. L., & Vakili D. (2005). A learner-centered framework for e-learning. Teachers College Record, 107(8), pp. 1582-1600.
McIsaac, M. S., & Gunawardena, C. N. (1996). Distance Education. In D.H. Jonassen (Ed.). Handbook of research for educational communications and technology: A project of the association for educational communications and technology, pp. 403-437. New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
McKnight, M. (2000). Distance education: Expressing emotions in video based classes. Paper presented at the Conference on College Composition and Communication, Minneapolis, MN.
McLellan, H. (1999). Online education as interactive experience: Some guiding models. Educational Technology, 39(5), pp. 36-42.
Miller, S. M., & Miller, K. L. (2000). Theoretical and practical considerations in the design of web-based instruction. In Abbey, B. (Ed.) Instructional and Cognitive Impacts of Web-Based Education, pp. 156-177. PA: Idea Group Publishing.
Moore, M. G. (1989). Editorial: Three types of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), pp. 1-7.
Moore, M. G. (1993). Theory of transactional distance. In Keegan, D. (Ed.), Theoretical Principle of Distance Education. pp. 22-38, London, New York: Routledge,
Moore, M. G. (2007). The theory of transactional distance. In M. G. Moore (Ed.), Handbook of Distance Education, 2nd ed., pp. 89-104. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (1996). Distance education: A systems view, Wadsworth Belmont, CA.
Moore, M. G., & Kearsely, G. (2005). Distance education: A systems view, 2nd ed. Thomson/Wadsworth.
Newberry, B. (2001). Raising student social presence in online classes. In Webnet 2001: World Conference on the WWW and Internet Proceedings, Orlando, FL, October 23-27.
Ng, E. W. J., & Detenber, B. H. (2005). The impact of synchronicity and civility in online political discussions on perceptions and intentions to participate. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(3).
Northrup, P. (2001). A framework for designing interactivity into web-based instruction. Educational Technology, 41(2), pp. 31-39.
Olpak, Y. Z., ve Çakmak, E. K. (2009). E-öğrenme ortamları için sosyal bulunuşluk ölçeğinin uyarlama çalışması. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 6(1), ss. 142-160.
Oppermann, R. (1994). Adaptively supported adaptability. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 40(3), pp. 455-472.
Parker, R. E., & Ingram, A. L. (2011). Considerations in choosing online collaboration systems: Functions, uses, and effects. Journal of the Research Center for Educational Technology, 7(1), pp. 2-15.
Paterno, F., & Mancini, C. (1999). Designing web interfaces adaptable to different types of use. Proceedings of the Workshop Museums and the Web, Pittsburgh. Picciano, A. G. (2001). Distance learning: Making connections across virtual space
and time. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Picciano, A. G. (2002). Beyond student perceptions: Issues of interaction, presence, and performance in an online course. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 6(1), pp. 21-40.
Portway, P., & Lane, C. (1994). Teleconferencing and distance education, 2d ed. Livermore, CA: Applied Business Telecommunications.
Poza, M. I. C. (2011). A case of computer-mediated communication and multimedia ıntegration: Breaking classroom barriers with more ınput and opportunities to communicate. Northeast Conference on the Teaching of Foreign Languages NECTFL, 67, pp. 69-84.
Ralston, A., Reilly, E. D., & Hemmendinger, D. (1993). Encyclopedia of computer science, Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Repman, J., Zinskie, C., & Carlson, R. D. (2005). Effective use of cmc tools in interactive online learning. Computers in The Schools, 22(1-2), pp. 57-69. Rich, E. (1983). Users are individuals: Individualizing user models. International
Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 18, pp. 199-214.
Richardson, J. C., & Swan, K. (2003). Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students’ perceived learning and satisfaction. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(1), pp. 68-88.
Riding, R., & Rayner, S. (1998). Cognitive styles and learning strategies: Understanding style differences in learning and behaviour. London: David Fulton Publishers.
Rockinson-Szapkiw, A. J., Baker, J. D., Neukrug, E., & Hanes, J. (2010). The efficacy of computer mediated communication technologies to augment and support effective online helping profession education. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 28(3), pp. 161-177.
Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (1999). Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferencing. Journal of Distance Education, 14(2), pp. 50-71.
Rovai, A. P. (2002). Development of an instrument to measure classroom community. The Internet and Higher Education, 5, pp. 197-211.
Saba, F., & Zhang, W. (2003). Evolution of research in distance education: An American perspective. Global perspectives: Philosophy and practice in distance education. Journal of China Distance Education.
Sadera, W. A., Robertson, J., Song, L. & Midon, M. N. (2009). The role of community in online learning success. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 5(2), pp. 227-284.
Schullo, S., Venable, M., Barron, A. E., Kromrey, J. D., Hilbelink, A., & Hohlfeld, T. (2005). Enhancing online courses with synchronous software: An analysis of strategies and interactions. In: Proceedings of the National Educational Computing Conference, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Schwier, R. A., & Balbar, S. (2002). The interplay of content and community in synchronous and asynchronous communication: virtual communication in a graduate seminar. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 28(2), pp. 21-30.
Scollins-Mantha, B. (2008). Cultivating social presence in the online learning classroom: A literature review with recommendations for practice. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 5(3), pp. 23-38.
Shea, P. J. (2006). A study of students' sense of learning community in an online learning environment. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 10(1), pp. 35-44.
Short, J. E., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. New York: Wiley.
So, H. J. (2008). When groups decide to use asynchronous online discussions: Collaborative learning and social presence under a voluntary participation structure. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(2), pp. 143-160.
So, H. J., & Brush, T. A. (2008). Student perceptions of collaborative learning, social presence and satisfaction in a blended learning environment: Relationships and critical factors. Computers and Education, 51(1), pp. 318-336.
Southwell, B. G., Anghelcev, G., Himelboim, I., & Jones, J. (2007).Translating user control availability into perception: The moderating role of prior experience. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(1), pp. 554–563.
Spencer, D. (2002). A field study of the use of synchronous computer-mediated communication in asynchronous learning networks. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, Rutgers University, Newark, New Jersey.
Stemler, L. K. (1997). Educational characteristics of multimedia: A literature review. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 6(3/4), pp. 339-360. Sun, P., & Cheng, H. (2007). The design of instructional multimedia in e-learning: A
media richness theory-based approach. Computers and Education, 49(3), pp. 662-676.
Swan, K. (2001). Virtual interactivity: Design factors affecting student satisfaction and perceived learning in asynchronous online courses. Distance Education, 22(2), pp. 306-331.
Swan, K., & Shih, L. F. (2005). On the nature and development of social presence in online course discussions. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 9(3), pp. 115-136.
Tammelin, M. (1998). From telepresence to social presence: The role of presence in a network-based learning environment. In Tella, S. (Ed.), Aspects of media education: Strategic imperatives in the information age, Media Education Centre. Department of Teacher Education. University of Helsinki: Media Education Publications 8.
Thach, E. C., & Murphy, K. L. (1995). Competencies for distance education professionals. Educational Technology Research and Development, 43(1), pp. 57-79.
Tu, C. H. (2000). Critical examination of factors affecting interaction on CMC. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 23(1), pp. 39-58.
Tu, C. H. (2001). How Chinese perceive social presence: An examination of interaction in online learning environment. Educational Media International, 38(1), pp. 45-60.
Tu, C. H. (2002). The relationship between social presence and online privacy. The Internet and Higher Education, 5(4), pp. 293-318.
Tu, C. H., & Corry, M. (2002). eLearning communities. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 3(2), pp. 207-218.
Tu, C. H., & McIsaac, M. (2002), The relationship of social presence and interaction in online classes. American Journal of Distance Education, 16(3), pp. 131- 150.
Wiener, M., & Mehrabian, A. (1968). Language within language: Immediacy, a channel in verbal communication. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
EKLER
Ek 1. Öğretim İzlencesi
Ek 2. Sosyal Etkileşim Araçlarını Uyarlama Formu
Ek 3. Ders Hedefleri Ek 4. Belirtke Tablosu Ek 5. Başarı Testi Ek 6. Uygulama Sınavı Ek 7. Bireysel Görevler Ek 8. Grup Görevleri
Ek 9. Çevrimiçi Öğrenme Ortamına İlişkin Görüş Formu