• Sonuç bulunamadı

Heart rate in heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Heart rate in heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction"

Copied!
1
0
0

Yükleniyor.... (view fulltext now)

Tam metin

(1)

Editorial Comment

Heart failure is a disease that has high mortality and morbidity rates. However, as a syndrome, different phenotypes have been introduced by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) 2016 guidelines (1). Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is the major phenotype in which evidence-based medicine with ACE inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (or ARNI in place of these agents), beta blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and ivabradine play an important role (1). The ESC 2016 guidelines introduced a novel phenotype, named heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF), in addition to another major phenotype–heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) (1). Among the two major phenotypes, HFmrEF remains in the “grey” or “transition” zone of diagnosis, with both-sided transitions identified in the literature (2). This little brother (or sister) was initially introduced to behave like HFpEF; hence, the diagnosis simulated HFpEF. However, recent data designate that HFmrEF might be more similar to HFrEF (3).

Heart rate is an integral part of the appropriate function of the cardiovascular system, and high heart rate among patients with HFrEF is related to poor outcomes as high heart rate complicates the calcium current, not only in systole but also in diastole in HF (4). Hence, lowering the heart rate with ivabradine to a certain threshold (<70 bpm) was shown to improve morbidity (5).

In this issue, Xin et al. (6) provided interesting data in a small group of patients with HFmrEF that lower heart rate (<70 bpm) at discharge, among hospitalized HFmrEF patients, particularly among those prescribed with beta blockers, resulted in outcome benefit in the form of combined end-point of HF hospitalization and all-cause mortality. Hence, they provided clue that HFmrEF is more similar to HFrEF than HFpEF with regard to heart rate. Although transitions to HFrEF or HFpEF during follow-up of patients with HFmrEF via echocardiography is not provided in the study, it is likely that the majority of these patients remained in the HFmrEF or HFrEF subcategory during the follow-up. It is also notable that in the absence of beta blockers, such relation was lost. Hence, in patients with HFmrEF, beta blockers seem to provide outcome benefit by also lowering heart rate to <70 bpm in most patients, similar to HFrEF, as shown in a previous

study (7). This finding is expected to have some implications in the near future.

Mehmet Birhan Yılmaz

Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Cumhuriyet Univer-sity; Sivas-Turkey

References

1. Ponikowski P, Voors AA, Anker SD, Bueno H, Cleland JG, Coats AJ, et al.; Authors/Task Force Members;Document Reviewers. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: The Task Force for the diagnosis and treat-ment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur J Heart Fail 2016; 18: 891-975. [CrossRef]

2. Chioncel O, Lainscak M, Seferovic PM, Anker SD, Crespo-Leiro MG, Harjola VP, et al. Epidemiology and one-year outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure and preserved, mid-range and reduced ejection fraction: an analysis of the ESC Heart Failure Long-Term Registry. Eur J Heart Fail 2017; 19: 1574-85. [CrossRef]

3. Pascual-Figal DA, Ferrero-Gregori A, Gomez-Otero I, Vazquez R, Delgado-Jimenez J, Alvarez-Garcia J, et al. Mid-range left ventric-ular ejection fraction: Clinical profile and cause of death in ambu-latory patients with chronic heart failure. Int J Cardiol 2017; 240: 265-70. [CrossRef]

4. Beuckelmann DJ, Näbauer M, Erdmann E. Intracellular calcium handling in isolated ventricular myocytes from patients with termi-nal heart failure. Circulation 1992; 85: 1046-55. [CrossRef]

5. Chow SL, Page RL 2nd, Depre C. Role of ivabradine and heart rate lowering in chronic heart failure: guideline update. Expert Rev Car-diovasc Ther 2018; 16: 515-26. [CrossRef]

6. Xin Y, Chen X, Zhao Y, Hu W. The impact of heart rate on patients di-agnosed with heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction. Anatol J Cardiol 2019; 21: 68-74.

7. Cleland JGF, Bunting KV, Flather MD, Altman DG, Holmes J, Coats AJS, et al.; Beta-blockers in Heart Failure Collaborative Group. Beta-blockers for heart failure with reduced, mid-range, and pre-served ejection fraction: an individual patient-level analysis of dou-ble-blind randomized trials. Eur Heart J 2018; 39: 26-35. [CrossRef]

Heart rate in heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction

Address for correspondence: Dr. Mehmet Birhan Yılmaz, Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Kardiyoloji Anabilim Dalı; Sivas-Türkiye

Phone: +90 505 292 74 42 E-mail: [email protected]

Accepted Date: 01.11.2018

©Copyright 2018 by Turkish Society of Cardiology - Available online at www.anatoljcardiol.com DOI:10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2018.56324

Referanslar

Benzer Belgeler

Nevertheless, the management of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is a true achievement that led to a marked improvement of the quality of life

This study establishes that MMP-9 significantly correlates with cardiac remodeling and increased left ventricular volumes, along with the presence of fibrosis in patients with

However, the authors measured a healthy human concentration of 16.91 (0–81) pg/mL in Figure 1a, which we consider as an important problem as to how the kit measured levels below

IL- 10 inhibited infiltration of inflammatory cells and expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines in the myocardium, improved myocardial function, and protected from adverse

We believe that exacerbation of cardiac failure and further im- paired exercise capacity in patients living at intermediate high altitudes may be attributed to that

In the present study, the prognostic significance of the BDNF values was investigated in patients with severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVEF ≤35%) of mildly

In the following analysis of patients with sinus rhythm, beta blockers showed great positive effects on patients with heart rate &lt;70 bpm (p=0.046), as for the quality of life

Therefore, we performed a post-hoc analy- sis of data from the APOLLON trial (A comPrehensive, Obser- vationaL registry of heart faiLure with mid-range and preserved ejection