• Sonuç bulunamadı

MOMENT DISTRIBUTION METHOD

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "MOMENT DISTRIBUTION METHOD"

Copied!
12
0
0

Yükleniyor.... (view fulltext now)

Tam metin

(1)

MOMENT DISTRIBUTION METHOD

 It is known as HARDY CROSS method as well.

 Provides a convenient means of analysing statically indeterminate beams and frames by simple hand calculations.

 This is an basically an iterative process. The process is repeated a number of times or cycles till the values obtained within the desired accuracy.

This method of consists of solving slope deflection equations by successive approximation that may be carried out to any desired degree of accuracy.

Essentially, the method begins by assuming each joint of a structure is fixed.

Then by unlocking and locking each joint in succession, the internal moments at the joints are distributed and balanced until the joints have rotated to their final or nearly final positions. This method of analysis is both repetitive and easy to apply.

SIGN CONVENTION

 The sign convention followed in the development of the method is the same as the one followed for the slope deflection method.

Before developing this method, it is necessary to define certain terms employed in this method.

1. Absolute Stiffness of a Member

(2)

For this beam, the moment Mij thus represents the absolute stiffness of member i-j. From table , the moment Mij=4EI/L considering i as unity.

The ratio I/L is referred to as the relative stiffness and is denoted by the letter K.

2. Carry Over Factor (C.O.F.)

If a moment Mij is applied at end I of the member in Fig.1, a specified amount of moment Mji , is generated at the farther restrained end.

It is defined as the factor by which the moment at simply supported end ‘i’, Mij , is multiplied to get the moment carried over to the other end, that is Mji,

Mji=C.O.F. x Mij

According to Fig.1 , the C.O.F. is always (+1/2). If the farther end is a hinged end instead of a fixed one as shown in table, the corresponding stiffness is known as the modified stiffness of a member and is equal to

Mij=3EI/L

Figure 1. Absolute stiffness of a member when far end is fixed.

(3)

K*=3/4 K

Obviously , the moment carried over to the farther hinged end, Mji=0.

3. Distribution Factor (D.F.)

Consider a joint in a structure where two or more members meet. If an external moment M is applied to such a joint, the joint undergoes a rotation  as shown. Since all the members meeting at this point undergo the same rotation , the applied moment M is distributed to each of the ends of the members according to their relative stiffness values. The factor by which the applied moment is multiplied to obtain the end moment of any member is known as the Distribution Factor (D.F.).

Consider the FBD of joint 1 in Fig2b. For equilibrium of joint 1, we have M12+M13+M14+M15-M=0

(4)

In writing the equilibrium, clockwise moments on a joint are considered positive. The end-moments of members can be written in terms of the angle of rotation  as

M12=4EK12 M13=4EK13 M14=4EK14 M15=4EK15

M=4E(K12+K13+K14+K15) or M=4EK or =M / 4EK

where K denotes the sum of the relative stiffness of all the members meeting at joint 1. Substituting the value for  , we get

M12=4EK12 M

K K K E 4

M 12

Ratio K12/K indicates the fraction by which the applied moment M is to be multiplied to get the moment resisted by member 1-2. This ratio by definition is the distribution factor. The distribution factor for any member i- j is defined in general as

rij = Kij / K

(5)

BASIC STEPS

 Find the distribution factors

 Compute the FEM due to total load and dead load for each member

 Carry over the moments (fixed-end) once and add

 Carry over moments and the FEM are balanced. This gives the maximum member end moments.

 To find the maximum positive span moment, the carry over moment to the mid-span is added to the positive fixed-end moment.

MOMENT DISTRIBUTION FOR FRAMES WITHOUT SIDESWAY It is the same procedure as for continuous beams. (When the joint translations are prevented).

It is quite usual that in frames more than 2 members meet at a joint. Care must be taken in such cases to include the stiffness of all members meeting at any joint evaluating the distribution factors.

For a single bay, single storey frame, it is convenient to spread out legs of the frame so that the frame lies along a straight line.

(6)

ANALYSIS OF FRAMES WITH LATERAL TRANSLATION OF JOINTS (moment distribution for frames with sidesway)

So far we considered frames in which the joints are not allowed to translate laterally. However in frames, the translation of some joints is common due to forces

i-) acting in the lateral direction.

or due to

ii-) unsymmetrical forces or due to

iii-) unsymmetry in the make of the frame even though the load is symmetrical

(7)

In frames undergoing lateral translation, the analysis is carried out in 2 stages.

1-) moment distribution for the frame without sway (Mno sidesway) 2-) moment distribution for the sway effect only (M sidesway)

The final result can be obtained by the superposition of the separate cases MFINAL=(Mno sidesway)+ (M sidesway)

Procedure example

*In the first stage, the frame is prevented from undergoing any lateral translation by applying an artificial restraint.

*The value of artificial restraining force X can be obtained by first evaluating the shear at the bases of the columns.

*Then from the equilibrium condition, FH = 0, the value of X can be evaluated.

* At this stage the end moments obtained are true only when restraining force X were acting.To achieve the true condition of the structure, the frame has to be analysed again by applying a force equal and opposite to artificial restraining force X.

(8)

*The member end-moments resulting from this condition of loading will be combined with the moments obtained from the earlier restrained condition to obtain the true values of moments in the frame.

*The moments in the members of the frame due to application of the force (-X) are obtained in an indirect manner. The frame is assumed to be subjected to an arbitrary loading, say X/.

*The true values of moments under a horizontal force (-X) can be obtained by multiplying the moments caused by the X/ by the ratio, X/X

*The moments thus obtained are added to the moments obtained in the first stage of moment distribution.

Example : 1

Determine the end-moments of the members of the frame shown in figure. E is constant and relative I values are indicated on the frame. (Let E=20)

* As a first step we artificially restrain joint 3 from undergoing lateral translation. The moment distribution for this restrained condition is already worked out before.

(9)

The artificial restraining force X is worked out considering the FBD of the columns as in figure shown below. Summing the moments about joint 2 we have

;

M2=0 4V12-(50x2)+(54.77)=0 V12=11.31 kN Similarly summing the moments about joint 3 we get;

Applying equilibrium condition FH=0 for the entire structure 50-11.31-13.39-X=0

X=25.3 kN (This is the force, the artificial restraint, that prevent lateral translation).

To obtain the true condition, the artificial constraint has to be removed by applying a force equal but opposite to force X. This needs a second distribution of moments. However, this has to be worked out in an indirect manner.

Apply an unknown force, X/. The FEM’s in the columns can be worked out considering that joints 2 and 3 only translate and do not rotate. If tha axial deformation in the beam is neglected, the tanslations  are the same at both

(10)

The FEM’s are entered, as usual, in the table shown below. The distribution factors are same as found before. The moment distr. İs carried out as usual and the final moments are shown in the last row of the table.

(11)

The lateral force X/ which produced these moments can be evaluated by considering the free body diagram of the columns as in figure shown below. The summation of the moments about joint 2 gives,

V12=11.52/4=2.88 kN

Similarly, the summation of the moments about joint 3 gives V43=16.15+23.11/4=9.82 kN

From considerations of equilibrium of horizontal forces FH=0, we have X/=2.88+9.82=12.70 kN

The true value of the horizontal force to be applied to the frame is 25.30 kN.

Therefore, the moments due to lateral force of 25.30 kN are obtained by proportion, that is, by multiplying the moments in by a factor 25.30/12.70=1.992.

These moments are added to the values of the moments found. Thus, the true moments in the frame are ;

M12=0

M21=-54.77+11.52x1.992=-31.82 M32=-35.73-16.15x1.992=-67.90=-M34

M43=17.80+23.11x1.992=63.84

(12)

As a check it is seen that the sum of the shears in the columns is equal to the external lateral force as shown below.

Referanslar

Benzer Belgeler

To study his views on issues such as the language problem, national integration, youth problems and

Full u s e was made of the government reports and resolutions, proceeding of the Imperial Legislative Council, the correspondence of the Government of India with the home

The T-test results show significant differences between successful and unsuccessful students in the frequency of using the six categories of strategies except

In government, secularism means a policy of avoiding entanglement between government and religion (ranging from reducing ties to a state religion to promoting secularism

With regard to the videoing process, Luoma (2004: 39) highlights the advantages of recording the discussion, as they may be used in self reflection of speaking skills. However,

Transformation matrix for space frames is written according to direction cosines of x, y and z axes of the members in local coordinate system with respect to its global

When they all stepped back on the scaffolding back of the drop, which was very heavy, built of oak and steel and swung on ball bearings, Sam Cardinella was left sitting there

The patient presented here is the first true gallbladder diverticulum case demonstrated well by magnetic resonance cho- langiopancreatography (MRCP) before any surgical