• Sonuç bulunamadı

Numerical Solutions of Duffing Equations Involving Linear Integral with Shifted Chebyshev Polynomials

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Numerical Solutions of Duffing Equations Involving Linear Integral with Shifted Chebyshev Polynomials "

Copied!
11
0
0

Yükleniyor.... (view fulltext now)

Tam metin

(1)

Numerical Solution of Duffing Equations Involving Linear Integral Term…, Anapalı vd..

AKÜ FEMÜBİD 15 (2015) 021301 1

AKÜ FEMÜBİD 15 (2015) 021301 (1-11) AKU J. Sci. Eng. 15 (2015) 021301 (1-11) DOI:10.5578/fmbd.9211 Araştırma Makalesi / Research Article

Numerical Solutions of Duffing Equations Involving Linear Integral with Shifted Chebyshev Polynomials

Ayşe Anapalı, Yalçın ÖZTÜRK, Mustafa GÜLSU

Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Muğla University, Muğla, Turkey Ula Ali Koçman Vocational School, Muğla University, Muğla, Turkey

e-posta: yozturk@mu.edu.tr

Geliş Tarihi:14.11.2014; Kabul Tarihi:03.04.2015 Keywords

Duffing-van der Pol equation; Duffing equation; Shifted

Chebyshev polynomials;

Chebyshev series;

Shifted Chebyshev polynomial solutions;

Approximation method.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to give a shifted Chebyshev polynomial approximation for the solution of Duffing-van der Pol equation involving linear integral term (DEILI). For this purpose, a new Chebyshev collocation method is introduced. This method is based on taking the truncated shifted Chebyshev expansion of the function. This method based on first taking the truncated Chebyshev series of the solution function in the DEILI and then, transforms DEILI and given conditions into a matrix equation and then, we have the system of nonlinear algebraic equation using collocation points. Then, solving the system of algebraic equations we have the coefficients of the truncated Chebyshev series. In addition, examples that illustrate the pertinent features of the method are presented, and the results of study are discussed.

Lineer İntegral Terim İçeren Duffing Denkleminin Shifted Chebyshev Polinomları ile Nümerik Çözümleri

Anahtar kelimeler Duffing-Van der Pol

denklemi; Duffing denklemi; Shifted

Chebyshev Polinomları;

Chebyshev serisi;

Shifted Chebyshev polinom çözümleri;

Yaklaşım metodu

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı linear terim içeren Duffing-van der Pol denkleminin shifted Chebyshev polinomları yardımı ile yaklaşık çözümlerini sunmaktır. Bu amaçla Chebyshev sıralama metodu verilmiştir. Metodun ana karekteristiği verilen denklemi kesilmiş Chebyshev serisinin katasyılarının içeren bir denklem sistemine indirgemesidir. Bu sistem çözülerek kesilmiş Chebyshev serisinin katsayıları bulunur. Dolayısıyla yaklaşık çözüm elde edilir.

Ayrıca, metodun uygulanabilirlini göstermek için örnekler sunulmuştur.

© Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi

1.Introduction

Duffing equation is a mathematical model to describe a classical oscillator in a double-well by a periodical driven, which has been widely investigated in chaotic

phenomena (Mickens, 1981;

Guckenheimer and Holmes, 1983). It arises

in a variety of different scientific fields such as periodic orbit extraction, non-uniformity caused by an infinite domain, nonlinear mechanical oscillators, prediction of diseases (Ahmad and Alghamdi,2007; Tang, 1998). (Ahmad and Alghandi, 2008) presented the existence and uniquenes

(2)

AKÜ FEMÜBİD 15 (2015) 021301 2 solution of the Duffing equation involving

both integral and non-integral forcing terms with separated boundary conditions by a generalized quasilinearization technique. The numerical solutions of the Duffing equation with two-point boundary conditions have been investigated by many researchers (Yao,2009; Geng,2011;

Geng,2009).

In this paper, we consider the Duffing equation involving linear integral, which can be written as

) ( )

( ) , (

) ' , , ( ) ( ' ) ( ''

0

t g ds s y s t k

y y t f t y t y

t

1 0 t  (1)

with the initial conditions

0

y ( 0 ) 

1

y ' ( 0 ) 

and

0

y ( 1 ) 

1

y ' ( 1 ) 

(2) where

,

0

,

1

,

0

,

1

,

and

are real constant.

The aim of this study is to get solution as truncated Chebyshev series defined by

 

N

n n n

N

t a T t

y

0

*

( ) '

)

(

,

) cos(

)

*(

n t

Tn  , 2t1cos

(3) where Tn*(t) denotes the shifted Chebyshev polynomials of the first kind;

' denotes a sum whose first term is halved;

a

n

( 0  nN )

are unknown Chebyshev coefficients, and N is chosen any positive integer.

2. Preliminaries and notations

In this section, we state some basic results about polynomial approximations. These important properties will enable us to solve the Duffing equations. Polynomials are the only functions that the computer can evaluate exactly, so we make approximate functions R R by

polynomials. We consider real-valued functions on the compact interval

[ b a , ]

:

R b a f : [ , ] 

and we denote the set all real-valued polynomials on

[ b a , ]

by P, that is

N

i i i

x a x

p b a x p

0

) ( ], , [ ,

and

} ,

)) ( deg(

: ) (

{  

N p x p x N N Z

The uniform norm (or maximum norm) is defined by

) ( max

] ,

[

f x

f

b a

x .

Definition 2.1 For a given continuous function

f  C [ b a , ]

, a best approximation polynomial of degree N is a polynomial pN* (f)PN such that

} :

min{

)

*

(

N

N

f f p p P

p

f    

where the uniform norm is defined by

)

( max

] ,

[

f x

f

b a

x .

Theorem 2.1 (Rivlin,1969; Davis,1963) Let

]

, [ b a C

f 

. Then for any

0, there exist a polynomial pfor which

p

f

The theorem states that any continuous function

f

can be approximated uniformly by polynomials, no matter how badly behaved

f

may be on

[ b a , ]

. For phrasing; for any continuous function on

] ,

[ b a

,

f

, there exist a sequence of polynomial

( p

N

)

NN which converges uniformly towards

f

such that

(3)

AKÜ FEMÜBİD 15 (2015) 021301 3

0

lim  

N

N

f p

.

Theorem 2.2 (Rivlin,1969; Davis,1963;

Boyd, 2000; Atkinson, 2009; Mason and Handscomb, 2003) For any

f  [ b a , ]

and

0

N the best approximation polynomial

)

*

( f

p

N exists and is unique.

Definition 2.2 Given an integer N 1 a grid is a set of

( N  1 )

points

N i

x

i

X  ( )

0 in

[ b a , ]

such that

b x x

x

a

0

1

N

. Then points

N i

x

i

)

0

(

are called the nodes of the grid.

Theorem 2.3 (Rivlin,1969; Davis,1963;

Boyd, 2000; Atkinson, 2009; Mason and Handscomb, 2003) Given a function

] , [ b a C

f 

and a grid of

( N  1 )

nodes

N i

x

i

X  ( )

0 , there exist a unique polynomial INX( f) of degree N such that

) ( ) )(

( i i

X

N f x f x

I  , 0i N )

( f

INX is called the interpolant (or interpolating polynomial) of

f

through the grid X . The interpolant INX( f) can be express in the Lagrange form:

N

i

X i i X

N

f f x x

I

0

) ( ) ( )

( 

where Xi (x) is the i-th Lagrange cardinal polynomial associated with the grid X :

 

N

j i

j i j

X i

i

x x

x x x

, 0

)

(

, 0i N.

The Lagrange cardinal polynomials are such that

 

 

i j

j x

j ij

i

X

i

0

) 1

(

 ,

0  i , j ,  N

.

The best approximation polynomials )

* ( f

pN are also an interpolant of

f

at 1

N nodes and the error in given by :

   

I ( f ) ( 1 ( X )) f p

*

( f )

f

NX N N

where

N

(X )

is the Lebesque constant relative to the grid X

N

i X b i a

N

X

x

x

] 0 ,

[

( )

max : )

( 

The Lebesque constant contains all the information on the effects of the choice of

X on

I ( f )

f

NX .

Theorem 2.4 (Rivlin,1969; Davis,1963;

Boyd, 2000; Atkinson, 2009; Mason and Handscomb, 2003) For any choice of the grid X , there exist a constant C0 such that

C N

N x   

 2ln( 1)

)

(

.

Corollary 2.1 (Rivlin,1969; Davis,1963;

Boyd, 2000; Atkinson, 2009; Mason and Handscomb, 2003) Let

N

(X )

be Lebesque constant relative to the grid X, then

N

( X )

as

n  

.

In a similar way, by a uniform grid,

N X eN

N

N

ln

~ 2 ) (

1

as N .

This means that for any choice of type sampling of

[ b a , ]

, there exists a continuous function

f  C [ b a , ]

such that

)

INX( f does not convergence uniformly towards

f

. Let assume that the function

f

is sufficiently smooth to have derivatives at least up to order

( N  1 )

, with

f

(N1) continuous i.e.

fC

N 1

[ a , b ]

.

(4)

AKÜ FEMÜBİD 15 (2015) 021301 4 Definition 2.3 The nodal polynomial

associated with the grid is the unique polynomial of degree

( N  1 )

and leading coefficient 1 whose zeroes are the

( N  1 )

nodes of X :

 

N

i

i X

N

x x x

w

0

1

( ) ( )

.

Theorem 2.5 (Rivlin,1969; Davis,1963;

Boyd, 2000; Atkinson, 2009; Mason and Handscomb, 2003) If

fC

N 1

[ a , b ]

, then for any grid X of

( N  1 )

nodes, and for any

x  [ b a , ]

, the interpolation error is

) )! (

1 (

) ) (

)(

( )

(

1

) 1 (

x N w

x f f I x

f

NX

N X

N

 

where

( x  ) [ a , b ]

and wN X 1(x) nodal polynomial associated with the grid

X .

Definition 2.5 The grid

X  ( x

i

)

0iN such that the

x

i’s are the

( N  1 )

zeroes of the Chebyshev polynomial of degree

( N  1 )

is called the Chebyshev-Gauss (CG) grid.

Theorem 2.7 (Rivlin,1969; Davis,1963;

Boyd, 2000; Atkinson, 2009; Mason and Handscomb, 2003) The polynomials of degree

( N  1 )

and leading coefficient 1, the unique polynomial which has the smallest uniform norm on

[ b a , ]

is the

) 1

(  n

th Chebyshev polynomial divided by

2

N.

2.1 Chebyshev polynomials

Definition 2.11 The Chebyshev polynomials

)

(x

T

n of the first kind is a polynomials in

x

of degree

n

, defined by relation (Mason and Handscomb,2003)

n x

T

n

( )  cos

, when xcos

If the range of the variable

x

is the interval

]

1 , 1

[

, the range the corresponding variables

can be taken

[ 0 , ]

. We map

the independent variable

x

in

[ 0 , 1 ]

to the variable

s

in

[ 1 , 1 ]

by transformation

1 2 

 x

s or ( 1)

2

1 

s

x

and this lead to the shifted Chebyshev polynomial of the first kind Tn*(x) of degree

n

in

x

on

[ 0 , 1 ]

given by [13]

) 1 2 ( ) ( )

*(

T s T x

x

Tn n n .

It is of course possible to defined Tn*(x), like

T

n

(x )

, directly by a trigonometric relation. Indeed, we obtained

n x

Tn*( )cos2 when

x  cos

2

. The leading coefficient of

x

n in Tn*(x) to be

2

2n1. These polynomials have the following properties (Mason and Handscomb,2003):

i)

T

*n1

( x )

has exactly n1 real zeroes on the interval

[ 0 , 1 ]

. The i-th zero xn,i of ,for

i  0 , 1 ,..., n

) )) 1 ( 2

) 1 ) ( 2 cos( ( 1 2 ( 1

,

 

n

i

x

ni

n

(4)

ii) It is well known that the relation between the powers

x

n and the second kind Chebyshev polynomials Tn*(x) is for

1 0 x ,

) 2 (

'

2

*

0 1

2

T x

k

x n

n k

n

k n n



 

  

(5)

where

' denotes a sum whose first term is halved.

3. Fundamental relations

In this section, we give the matrix forms of each term in the Eq.(1) and conditions.

(5)

AKÜ FEMÜBİD 15 (2015) 021301 5 3.1 Matrix representation of the

differential part

We consider the solution

y (x )

of Eq. (1) and its derivative yN(k)(x) defined by a truncated Chebyshev series (3).Then, we can put series in the matrix form, for

2 , 1 , 0

k

A T

( ) )

( t

*

t

y

,

y

(k)

( t ) 

T*(k)

( t )

A (6) where

)]

( ...

) ( ) ( [ )

( 0* 1* *

* tT t T t TN t

T

T

aN

a a ... ] [ 0 1 A

By using the expression (5) and taking n=0,1,…,N we find the corresponding matrix relation as follows

T

T

t

t )) ( ( )) (

(

X

D T* and

t

T

t

T D

X

( ) 

*

( )

(7) where

] 1

[ )

( tt

t

N X





























































0 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2

0 0 2 6 1 2 6 2 2 6 3 2 6

0 0 0

2 4 1 2 4 2 2 4

0 0

0 0 2 2 1 2 2

0 0

0 0 0

2 0

1 2 1

2 1 2 1 2 2

5 5

5 6

3 3

4 1 2 0

N N

N N

N N

N N

N N N n N

N

D

Then, by taking into account (7) we obtain

t

T

t ) ( )( )

(

1

*

X D

T (8) and

T k

k

t

t )) ( )( )

(

(

T* ( )

X( ) D1 ,

k  0 , 1 , 2

To obtain the matrix X(k)

(t )

in terms of the matrixX

(t )

, we can use the following relation:

t

T

t

X B

X(1)

( )  ( )

2 1

) 2

(

( t )

X( )

( t )

BT X

( t )(

BT

)

X

 

(9)

where

0 0

0 0

0 0

2 0

0 0

0 1

0 0

0 0

N

B (10)

Consequently, by substituting the matrix forms (8) and (9) into (6) we have the matrix relation for

k  0 , 1 , 2

A D B

X 1

)

(k

 ( t )

k

(

T

)

y

(11) Moreover, substituting the zeroes of Chebyshev polynomials in Eq.(4) into Eq.

(6), we have A T

( ) )

( t

i

t

i

y

and

A D B X

A T

1 ) ( )

(

) ( ) (

) ( )

(

T k i

i k i k

t

t t

y (12)

or compact form TA

Y  and

A D XB

A T

Y

1 ) ( )

(

) (

) ( )

(

T k

i k i

k t t

(13)

where

) (

) (

) (

1 0

t

N

t t

T T T T

 ) (

) (

) (

1 0

t

N

y t y

t y

Y

 

 

) (

) (

) (

) (

1 ) (

0 ) (

) (

N k

k k

k

t y

t y

t

y

Y

(6)

AKÜ FEMÜBİD 15 (2015) 021301 6

N N N

N

N N N

x x

x

x x

x

x x

x

x x

x

2 2 2 2 2

1 2 1 1

0 2 0 0

1 1 1 1

X

Similarly, substituting the zeroes of Chebyshev polynomial into

y

r

(t )

, we obtained the matrix representation

Y Y

Y 1

__

)

(

r

r (14) where





) (

) (

) (

1 0

N r

r r

r

t y

t y

t y Y

) ( 0

0

0 )

( 0

0 0

) (

1 0 __

tN

y t

y t y

Y

and

__

__

__

A T

Y  (15) where

) ( 0

0

0 )

( 0

0 0

) (

1 0

__

tN

t t

T T

T T

A A

A A

0 0

0 0

0 0

__

.

We can write

s

n

n n r

m

m m

t y t y t H

t y t P y

y t f

0 0

) ( ' ) ( ) (

) ( ) ( )

' , , (

For obtained matrix form of

y

m,

m  Z

and

y

n

y '

,

n  Z

, using relation (14) and (15), we construct the following relations

A D X A

T 1

__

__

2(ti) y(ti)y(ti)( ) (ti)( T)

y (16a)

A D X A

T 2 1

__

__

2

3(ti)y (ti)y(ti)( ) (ti)( T)

y (16b)

A D X A

T 1 1

__

__

1( ) ( ) ( ) ( )( )

)

(i m i i m i T

m t y t yt t

y (16c)

and

A D B X A

T 1

__

__

) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ' )

(ti y titi T

y (16d)

A D B X A

T 2 1

__

2 __

) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ' )

(ti y titi T

y (16e)

A D B X A

T 1

__

__

) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ' )

( i in i T

n t y t t

y (16f)

Thus we can write

s

n

T i n n

r

m

T i m m

t t

t t

y y x f

0

__ 1 __

0

1 __ 1

__

) ( ) ( ) )(

(

) )(

( ) )(

( )

' , , (

A D B X A T H

A D X A T

P (17)

3.2 Matrix representation of integral part Let assume that

K ( s t , )

can be expanded to univariate Chebyshev series with respect to

t

as follows:

N

r

r sr

t T s f

s t K

0

).

( ) ( )

,

(

(18)

Then the matrix representations of the kernel function

K

s

( t x , )

become

), ( ) ( ) ,

( t s t s

K

F TT (19)

(7)

AKÜ FEMÜBİD 15 (2015) 021301 7 where

] ) ( )

( ) ( ) ( [ )

(tf0 t f1 t f2 tfN t

F .

Substituting the relations (6) , (15) and (18) in integral part, we obtained

A D Q D F

A D X

X D F

D X X D F

A T T F

1 1

1

0 1

1

0

1 0

) ( ) (

) ( ) ( ) ( )

(

A ) ( ) ( ) ( )

(

) ( ) ( ) ( ) (





 

T

T t

T

T t

T t

T

t

ds s s t

ds s

s t

ds s s t t

I

(20)

where

t

T s s ds

0

) ( ) ( X X

Q ,

and

N j

j i i q t

j i

ij

, , 0 , 1 ,..., ] 1

[

1

 

 

Q

.

3.3 Matrix representation of conditions On the other hand, the matrix form for conditions (2) can be written as

X D 1X B D 1

A

1 0

1 0

) ( ) 0 ( )

)(

0 (

) 0 ( ' ) 0 (

T T

y y

] [ ] [ u

00

u

01

u

0N

a

A (21a)

and

X D 1X B D 1

A

1 0

1 0

) ( ) 1 ( )

)(

1 (

) 0 ( ' ) 0 (

T T

y y

] [ ] [u10 u11 u1Nb

  A (21b)

4. Method of solution

Firstly, we construct the fundamental matrix equation corresponding to Eq.(1).

For computing the Chebyshev coefficient

matrix A numerically, the zeros of the Chebyshev polynomial defined by in Eq.(4) are put into the matrix form of Eq.(1). We obtain

r

m

T i m i

m

T i T

i

t t

t t

0

1 __ 1

__

1 1

2

) )(

( ) )(

(

) ( ) ( )

( ) (

A D X A T P

D B X D

B

X

) ( )

( ) (

) ( ) ( ) )(

(

1 1

0

__ 1 __

i T

i s

n

T i n i

n

t g t

B t t

A D Q D F

A D X

A T

H (22)

and then system can be written in the matrix form

XB2

(

DT

)

1

EXB

(

DT

)

1

r

m

T m m 0

1 1

__

__

) ( )

(

TA XD P

s

n

T n

n 0

__ 1 __

) ( )

(

TA XB D

H

G A D

Q D

F  

________

__ 1 ___

1 ( T) (23)

where

0 0 0

0 0

0

0 0

0

0 0

0

Ε

) ( 0

0 0

0 )

( 0 0

0 0

) ( 0

0 0

0 ) (

2 1 0

N m m

t m m

m

t t

x t

P P

P P

P

(8)

AKÜ FEMÜBİD 15 (2015) 021301 8

) ( 0

0 0

0 )

( 0

0

0 0

) ( 0

0 0

0 ) (

2 1

0

N n n

n n

t t

t t

H H

H H

H

) ( 0

0 0

0 )

( 0 0

0 0

) ( 0

0 0

0 ) (

2 1 0

tN

t t t

F F

F F

F

1 1

1 1

____

1

0 0 0

0 0

0

0 0

0

0 0

0

D D

D D

D

) ( 0

0 0

0 )

( 0 0

0 0

) ( 0

0 0

0 ) (

2 1 0

tN

t t t

Q Q

Q Q

Q

1 1 1 1

_______

1

) (

) (

) (

) (

) (

T T T T

T

D D D D

D

) (

) (

) (

) (

2 1 0

tN

g t g

t g

t g

G

Hence, the fundamental matrix equation (23) corresponding to Eq. (1) can be written in the form

G

WA  or

[

W;G

]

]

[wi, j

W ,

i ,  j 0 , 1 ,..., N

(24) where

________

1 ___ __

1

0

1 __

__

0

1 1

__

__

1 1

2

) ( )

( ) (

) ( ) (

) ( )

(

T s

n

T n n r

m

T m m

T T

D Q D F D

XB A T H

D X A T P

D EXB D

XB W

To obtain the solution of Eq. (1) under conditions (2), by replacing the row matrices (21a)-(21b) by the last 2 rows of the matrix (24), we have the new augmented matrix,

[W

~

;

]

~

G =





b u

u u

a u

u u

t f w

w w

t f w

w w

t f w

w w

N N

N N

N N

N

N N

;

;

) (

) (

;

) (

;

1 11

10

0 01

00

2 2

21 20

1 1

11 10

0 0

01 00

So, we obtain a system of (N 1) nonlinear algebraic equations with unknown shifted Chebyshev coefficients.

Thus, we obtain the Chebyshev polynomial solution.

We can easily check the accuracy of the method. Since the truncated shifted Chebyshev series (3) is an approximate solution of Eq.(1), when the solution

) (t

y

N and its derivatives are substituted in Eq.(1), the resulting equation must be satisfied approximately; that is (Body, 2000) forttq [0,1], q  0,1,2,...

0 ) ( )

( ) , (

) ' , , ( ) ( ' ) ( '' ) (

0

q

t q

q q

q q

t g ds s y s t k

y y t f t y t y x E

q

4.1 Error analysis and convergence Since, * 1

 1

T

N , we conclude that if we choose the grid nodes

( x

i

)

0iN to be zero the (N+1) zeroes of the Chebyshev polynomials TN*1, we have

(9)

AKÜ FEMÜBİD 15 (2015) 021301 9

1 1 2

2 1

N

X

wN

and this is the smallest possible value. In particular, from Theorem 2.5, for any

] 1 , 0

1

[

C

N

y

we have (Rivlin,1969;

Davis,1963; Body,2000)

1

1

2

( 1 )!

2

1

N

N N

y

y N

y

(25)

If

y

(N1) is uniformly bounded, the convergence of the interpolation

y

N towards y when N  is then extremely fast. Also the Lebesgue constant associated with the Chebyshev-Gauss grid is small

) 1 2ln(

~ )

( 

N X N

as N

This is much better than uniform grids and close to the optimal value.

5. Illustrative example

In this section, several numerical examples are given to illustrate the accuracy and effectiveness properties of the method and all of them were performed on the computer using a program written in Maple 13.

Example 1 Consider the following Duffing equation involving linear integral term for

1 0  t  ,

) ( )

( )

' 1 ( ' ''

0

2y s ds g t s

y y y y

t

with

0 ) 1 ( ' ) 1 ( 3 , 0 ) 0 ( ' ) 0 (

2 yyyy

where

2

3 4 3

4 2 2

2 1 2 3

4

) 1 ( 24

204 ) 540 228 32 15 ( ) 42 60 2 3 ( 8 ) 11 7 2 ( 66 ) 1 2 ( 132 726 18 16 ) 9

( e

t t t e t t t e t t e t t e e t t t t

g

t t

t

The exact solution of this problem is

) 1 ( 2

) 8 3 ( 2 11

)

( e

t e t e

y

t

 

.

By applying the presented method for different values of N , we obtain the numerical solutions by Maple 13. Taking

12 , 10 , 8

N

the numerical results are shown in Table 1.

The values of Ney(t)yN(t) at selected points. The graph of numerical solutions and absolute errors is shown in Figure 1 and 2 respectively.

Referanslar

Benzer Belgeler

In a trial conducted by Metcalfe (16) et al., rate of ath- erosclerotic renal artery disease in patients with PAD in ≥ 3 segments (43,4%) was found to be higher than in patients

Sarı’nın “Şehrimiz Diyarbakır”, İlhan Akbulut’un “Diyarbakır”, Ahmet Zeki İzgöer’in “Diyarbakır Salnameleri (1869-1905)”, Vedat Gündoğan’ın

Similarly, even if we do not know any phosphosites that are associated with an under- studied kinase (unseen class) in training, the zero-shot learning framework enables us to

So, the tetragonal based me- tallic defect structures were found to be superior to fct based metallic defect structures in terms of peak amplitude and the maximum achievable Q

We also propose two different energy efficient routing topology construction algorithms that complement our sink mobility al- gorithms to further improve lifetime of wireless

However, a detailed study of the nature of noises arising in guidance and control of spacecrafts shows that, more adequately, the noises disturbing the signal and the observations

“Şu Kürt Cemali olayını nasıl öğreneceğiz, biraz bilgi toplamak istiyorum.".. "O lu

Örneğin sanayi toplumu ortamında fabri- kanın kiri ve pası içerisinde yaşayan bir Batılı için özel olarak oluşturulmuş ye- şil alan kent kültürünün tamamlayıcı