ContentslistsavailableatScienceDirect
Progress
in
Organic
Coatings
jou rn a l h om ep a ge :w w w . e l s e v i e r . c o m / l o c a t e / p o r g c o a t
Fluorescence
study
of
film
formation
from
PS/Al
2
O
3
nanocomposites
Ö.
Pekcan
a,∗,
S¸.
U˘gur
b,
M.S.
Sunay
caKadirHasUniversity,Cibali,34320Istanbul,Turkey
bIstanbulTechnicalUniversity,DepartmentofPhysics,Maslak,34469Istanbul,Turkey cPiriReisUniversity,FacultyofScienceandLetters,Tuzla,34940Istanbul,Turkey
a
r
t
i
c
l
e
i
n
f
o
Articlehistory:
Availableonline22February2014 Keywords: Nanocomposites Polystyrene Annealing Films Fluorescence
a
b
s
t
r
a
c
t
Steadystatefluorescence(SSF)andUV–vis(UVV)techniqueswereusedtostudythefilmformation behaviorofpyrene(P)labeledpolystyrene(PS)latexandAl2O3(PS/Al2O3)compositesdependingonPS
particlessizeandAl2O3content.Theclose-packedarraysofPSspheres(SmPS:203nm;LgPS:382nm)
templatesoncleanglasssubstrateswerecoveredwithvariouslayersofAl2O3bydip-coatingmethod.
Twodifferentfilmseries(SmPS/Al2O3andLgPS/Al2O3)werepreparedinvariousAl2O3layercontent.The
filmformationbehaviorofthesecompositeswerestudiedbyannealingthematatemperaturerange of100–250◦Candmonitoringthescatteredlightintensity(Isc),fluorescenceintensity(IP)fromPand
transmittedlightintensity(Itr)throughthefilmsaftereachannealingstep.Opticalresultsindicatethat
classicallatexfilmformationwasoccurredforallAl2O3contentfilmsandfilmformationprocesswas
unaffectedbytheAl2O3contentforbothfilmseries.ExtractionofPStemplateproducedhighlyordered
porousstructuresforhighAl2O3contentinbothfilmseries.SEMimagesshowedthattheporesizeand
porositycouldbeeasilytailoredbyvaryingthePSparticlesizeandtheAl2O3content.
©2014ElsevierB.V.Allrightsreserved.
1. Introduction
Asaresultofworldwidetheoreticalandexperimentalefforts,a verygoodunderstandingofthemechanismsoflatexfilm forma-tionhasbeenachieved[1–4].Filmformationfromsoft(low-Tg)
andhard(high-Tg)latexdispersionscanoccurinseveralstages.
Inbothcases,thefirststagecorrespondstothewetinitialstage. Evaporationofsolventleadstosecondstageinwhichtheparticles formaclosepackedarray,hereiftheparticlesaresofttheyare deformedtopolyhedrons.Hardlatexhoweverstaysundeformed atthis stage.Annealingof soft particlescausesdiffusionacross particle–particleboundarieswhichleadstoahomogeneous con-tinuousmaterial.Intheannealingofhardlatexsystem,however, deformationofparticlesfirstleadstovoidclosure[1–4]andthen afterthevoidsdisappeardiffusionacrossparticle–particle bound-ariesstarts,i.e.themechanicalpropertiesofhardlatexfilmsevolve duringannealing;afterallsolventhasevaporatedandallvoidshave disappeared.
This understanding of latex film formation can now be exploited tounderpin theprocessing of newtypes of coatings anddevelopmentofnewmaterials.Processingandmicrostructure developmentofceramicandpolymercoatingpreparedby deposit-ingasolutionordispersionhavebeenofinterestinlastfewyears
∗ Correspondingauthor.Tel.:+902125336532x1330;fax:+902125332286. E-mailaddress:pekcan@khas.edu.tr(Ö.Pekcan).
[5,6].Colloidalceramics,sol–gelderived ceramicsandpolymers havebeenstudiedascoatingsystems.Organizationof monodis-persedcolloidalparticles likelatexandsilica microspheresinto higher-ordermicrostructuresisattractinggrowinginterest[7,8], sinceitprovidesuniquestructuressuitableforvariousadvanced devices and functional materials such as photonic crystals [9] andporouspolymers[10].Colloidalcrystalsconsistingof three-dimensionalorderedarraysofmonodispersedspheres,represent noveltemplatesforthepreparationofhighlyordered macropo-rous inorganicsolids, exhibiting precisely controlled pore sizes and highly ordered three-dimensional porousstructures. These features are requirements for new photonic crystals, and can bebeneficial incatalysisorlarge-moleculeseparationprocesses by potentially improvingmass transfer processes and efficien-cies.Orderedarraysofpolymer(e.g.polystyreneorpoly(methyl methacrylate))orsilicananosphereshavebeenextensivelystudied inrecentyearsforphotoniccrystalapplications[11,12].Recently, theyhaveattractedrenewedinterest,mainlybecausetheyprovide amuchsimpler,fasterandcheaperapproachthancomplex semi-conductor nanolithography techniques to create 3D photonic crystalsworkingintheopticalwavelengthrange[13,14].Photonic crystals (i.e.spatially periodicstructures of dielectric materials withdifferentrefractiveindices)have beenextensively investi-gatedworldwide.Becausethelatticeconstantofphotoniccrystals isinthevisibleorinfraredwavelengthrange,theycancontrolthe propagationofphotonsinawaysimilartothewayasemiconductor doesforelectrons.
0300-9440/$–seefrontmatter©2014ElsevierB.V.Allrightsreserved. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2013.10.017
Aluminaisaveryimportantinorganicmaterialowningtoits thermal, chemical, and mechanical stability, and the hierarchi-callyporousaluminashouldbeanattractivematerialwhichcan bepotentiallyusedascatalystsupports,adsorbents,ion-exchange materials,membranesubstrates,etc[15].Severalreportsonporous aluminapreparationcanbefound[16].Al2O3 coatingshavealso
becomemorepopularfortheirhighdielectricstrength,exceptional stability,durabilityagainsthostileenvironmentsandhigh trans-parencydownto250nm.DuringthelastfewyearsAl2O3coatings
have beenwidely used for theirpractical applications,suchas refractorymaterials,antireflectioncoatings,highlyanticorrosive materials[17],microelectronicdevices[18],capacitancehumidity sensors[19]andalsoinheatsinksinIC’sandpassivationofmetal surfaces[20].Thesefilmshavebeenpreparedbyvarioustechniques suchasSpraypyrolysis[21],thermalevaporation[22],sputtering [23]etc.
In thepresent work,we reportthe preparation and charac-terization of PS/Al2O3 films. The film formation of these films
wasstudieddependingonPSparticlesizeandAl2O3content.The
resultsindicatethatLgPS/Al2O3 filmsshowedcompletefilm
for-mation independent of Al2O3 content while no film formation
occurredaboveacertainAl2O3contentforSmPS/Al2O3films.The
filmformationstagesweremodeledandrelatedactivationenergies were determined. After completion of film formation, PS tem-plateswereextractedwithtoluene. Theresultantstructurewas thereplicaofthePSparticlesandthematerialsgeneratedfrom thisprocessexhibitremarkableorderingoftheporeswithdifferent size.
2. Experimental
2.1. Materials
2.1.1. Polystyrene(latex)spheres
In this study, we used two types of PS latex with differ-ent diameters. The latex samples are composed of pyrene (P) labeled polystyrene. Fluorescent PS latexes were produced via emulsion polymerizationprocess [24]. The polymerizationwas performedbatch-wiselyusingathermostattedreactorequipped withacondenser,thermocouple,mechanicalstirringpaddleand nitrogeninlet.Water(50ml),Styrenemonomer(3g;99%purefrom Janssen)andthe0.014goffluorescent1-pyrenylmethyl methacry-late(PolyFluor®394)werefirstmixedinthepolymerizationreactor wherethetemperaturewaskeptconstant(at70◦C).Thewater soluble radicalinitiatorpotassium persulfate(KPS)(1.6%wt/wt overstyrene)dissolvedinsmallamountofwater(2ml)wasthen introducedin ordertoinducestyrenepolymerization. Different surfactantsodiumdodecylsulfate(SDS)concentrations(0.03%and
0.12%wt/vol)wereaddedinthepolymerizationrecipetochange the particlesize keeping all other experimental conditions the same. Thepolymerizationwasconducted under400rpm agita-tionduring12hundernitrogenatmosphereat70◦C.Theparticle sizewasmeasuredusingMalvenInstrumentNanoZS.Themean diameteroftheseparticlesis203nm(SmPS)and382nm(LgPS). Theweight-averagemolecularweights(Mw)ofindividualPSchain
(Mw)weremeasuredby gelpermeationchromatography (GPC)
andfoundas90×103gmol−1forboth203nm(SmPS)and382nm
(LgPS), respectively. The particle size of the polystyrene latex wasdecreased withincreasingtheconcentrationof SDSbutits molecularweightremainedalmostunchangedwithincreasingSDS concentration.Glasstransitiontemperature(Tg)ofthePSlatexes
weredeterminedusingdifferentialscanningcalorimeter(DSC)and foundtobearound105◦C.Fig.1showstheSEMimagesofSmPS andLgPSlatexparticlesproducedforthisstudy.
2.1.2. Al2O3solution
Al2O3 solwaspreparedinthefollowingway:Atotalof2ml
aluminum-tri-sec-butoxide(Aldrich;97%)wasdissolvedin45cm3
waterat70◦C.Thesolutionwasstirredfor30min.Asmallamount ofacidicacidwascontinuouslyaddedascatalyst,untilthesolution becametransparentandstirredforanother2h.Oxidenetworks areformeduponhydrolyticcondensationofalkoloxideprecursors. Finally,auniformandtransparentAl2O3solwasobtainedforfilm
fabrication.
2.2. PreparationofPS/Al2O3films
Firstly,LgPSandSmPSaqueoussuspensionsweredroppedon cleanglasssubstratesanddriedatroomtemperature.Uponslow dryingatroomtemperature,powderLgPSandSmPSfilmswere produced. In order tostudy theparticle size effect of PSlatex andAl2O3 contentonfilmformationbehaviorofPS/Al2O3
com-posites,wepreparedtwoseriesoffilms:Series1:LgPSandAl2O3
(LgPS/Al2O3)andSeries2:SmPSandAl2O3(SmPS/Al2O3).
Al2O3solwasfilledintothePStemplatesbydip-coatingmethod.
HeretheAl2O3contentinthefilmswasadjustedbyconsecutive
dippingcycle.Sevendifferentfilmsforeachseriesoffilmswere producedwith0,1,3,5, 8,10,and15 layers(dippingcycle)of Al2O3.InordertostudythefilmformationbehaviorofPS/Al2O3
composites,theproducedfilmswereseparatelyannealedaboveTg
ofPS,attemperaturesrangingfrom100to250◦C.Thetemperature wasmaintainedwithin±2◦Cduringannealing.Aftereach
anneal-ingstep,filmswereremovedfromtheovenandcooleddownto roomtemperature.
2.3. Methods
2.3.1. Fluorescencemeasurements
Afterannealing,each samplewasplacedin thesolid surface accessoryofaPerkin-ElmerModelLS-50fluorescence spectrom-eter.Pyrenewasexcitedat345nmandscatteringandfluorescence emissionspectraweredetectedbetween300and500nm.All mea-surements were carried out in the front-face positionat room temperature.Slitwidthswerekeptat8nmduringallSSF measure-ments.
2.3.2. Photontransmissionmeasurements
Photontransmissionexperimentswerecarriedoutusing Carry-100BioUV–vis(UVV)scanningspectrometer.Thetransmittances ofthefilmsweredetectedat500nm.Aglassplatewasusedasa standardforallUVVexperiments,andmeasurementswerecarried outatroomtemperatureaftereachannealingprocesses.
2.3.3. Scanningelectronmicroscopy(SEM)measurements
ScanningelectronmicrographsofthePS/Al2O3filmsweretaken
at10–20kVinaJEOL6335Fmicroscope.Athinfilmofgold(10nm) wassputteredontothesurfaceofsamplesusingaHummer-600 sputteringsystemtohelpimagethePS/Al2O3filmsagainsttheglass
background.
3. Resultsanddiscussions
Figs.2and 3showtransmitted(Itr), scattered(Isc)and
fluo-rescence(IP)light intensitiesversusannealingtemperaturesfor
bothSmPS/Al2O3 and LgPS/Al2O3 composite filmseries,
respec-tively.Uponannealingthetransmittedlightintensity,Itr,started
toincreaseaboveacertainonsettemperature,calledtheminimum filmformationtemperatureT0,forallfilmsamples.Scatteredlight
intensityshowedasharpincreaseatthesingletemperaturenamed asthevoidclosuretemperature,Tv.Fluorescenceintensity,IPofall
filmsamplesfirstincrease,reachamaximum,andthendecrease withincreasingannealingtemperature[25,26].Thetemperature whereIPreachesthemaximumiscalledthehealingtemperature,
Th.Minimumfilm formation(T0),void closure(Tv)and healing
(Th)temperaturesareimportantcharacteristicrelatedtothefilm
formationpropertiesof latexes.T0 isoftenused toindicatethe
lowestpossibletemperatureforparticledeformationsufficientto decreaseinterstitialvoiddiameterstosizeswellbelowthe wave-lengthoflight[27].Belowthiscriticaltemperature,thedrylatexis opaqueandpowdery.However,atand/orabovethistemperature, alatexcastfilmbecomescontinuousandclearfilm[28].HereTvis
thelowesttemperatureatwhichIscbecomehighest.Thehealing
temperature(Th)istheminimumtemperatureatwhichthelatex
filmbecomescontinuousandfreeofvoids.Thehealingpoint indi-catestheonsetoftheparticle–particleadhesion[28].Therefore, theincreaseinItraboveT0canbeexplainedbyevaluationofthe
transparencyofthecompositefilmsuponannealing.Most proba-bly,increasedItrcorrespondstothevoidclosureprocess[29];i.e.
polystyrenestarttoflowuponannealingandvoidsbetween parti-clescanbefilled.SincehigherItrcorrespondstohigherclarityofthe
composite,thenincreaseinItrpredictsthatmicrostructureofthese
filmschangeconsiderablybyannealingthem,i.e.thetransparency ofthesefilmsevolveuponannealing.PSstartstoflowdueto anneal-ing,andvoidsbetweenparticlescanbefilledduetotheviscous flow.Furtherannealingathighertemperaturecauseshealingand interdiffusionprocesses[26,29],resultinginamoretransparent film.
ThesharpincreaseinIscoccursatTv,whichoverlapsthe
inflec-tionpoint ontheItr curve.Below Tv,light scattersisotropically
becauseoftheroughsurfaceofthePSfilms.Annealingofthefilm atTv createsaflatsurfaceonthefilm,which actslikea mirror.
Asa result,light is reflected tothephotomultiplier detectorof the spectrometer. Further annealing makes the PS film totally transparenttolight andIscdropstoitsminimum.On theother
hand, the increase in IP above T0 presumably corresponds to
Fig.2.PlotofItr,IscandIPintensitiesversusannealingtemperature,TforSmPS/Al2O3compositefilmswith0(pure),1,5and10layersofAl2O3.Numbersoneachcurve
thevoid closure process up tothe Th point where the healing
processtakesplace.DecreaseinIPaboveThcanbeunderstoodby
interdiffusionprocessesbetweenpolymerchains[30,31]. Inordertodeterminetheextentoffilmformation,filmswere soakedintoluenefor24htocompletelydissolvethePStemplate afterthefilmformationiscompleted.AfterextractionofPS,the morphologyofSmPS/Al2O3filmswithoneandfivelayersofAl2O3
(Fig.4a)donotchangesignificantly.Intheseimages,SmPSspheres highlycoatedwithAl2O3areclearlyseen.However,somespherical
poreswhichmustbelongtotheAl2O3encapsulatedreplicaofSmPS
latexesarealsoobserved.Theseporeshaveawell-pronounced cir-cularshape andareisolatedfromeachother.SEMimageofthe filmpreparedwith10layersofAl2O3 inFig.4cshowsan
inter-connectedandopenporositywithaverageporesizediameterof 203nm,correspondingtoapproximatelySmPStemplatediameter. Inallimages,besidestheporestherearealsovoidsthatmightbe leftbytheinterconnectedSmPSaggregatedspheres.Itis under-stoodthathigherAl2O3contentandsmallPSsizecreatedaporous,
disorderedmaterialafterextractionoftemplate.
Ontheotherhand,SEMimagesofLgPS/Al2O3compositesgiven
inFig.4bpresenthighly porousstructuresafterextraction pro-cess.Theporesareuniformlydistributedinspace,butrandompore morphologyinthefilmswith1and5layersofAl2O3(seeFig.4b)
destroytheirsphericalshape.Thesefilmsshowapoorlyordered porestructureandheterogeneouspore-sizedistribution.Forthese lowAl2O3 contentfilms,apartiallybrokenwallframeworkwas
obtainedbecausetheAl2O3particlesmightnotbesufficienttofully
coverthesurfaceoftheLgPStemplate.However,itcouldbeseen fromFig.4bthatfilmwith10layersofAl2O3showswell-defined
spherical-orderedpores.Theporesareuniformlydistributedinthe sampleandshowedanorderedconnectedporousstructure.The homogenousdistributionoftheporesintheAl2O3framework
indi-catesthattheporousstructureretainstheperiodicityoftheLgPS template.
Inconclusion,SEMimagesofbothfilmseriesshowedthatwell definedopenstructureandinterconnectedporositywereobtained
whenAl2O3contentwasincreased.Thisbehaviorcanbeexplained
by removal of PSfrom the surface of the Al2O3 covered latex
particlesduringthedissolutionprocess.Inotherwords,thefilm formationfromSmPSandLgPSparticleshasoccurredontopofthe Al2O3coveredparticlesduringannealingand,duringdissolution,
PSmaterialiscompletelydissolvedshowingthemicrostructureof PSparticlescoveredbyAl2O3layer.Thispictureisnowdepictedin
Fig.5wherethebehaviorofSmPS/Al2O3andLgPS/Al2O3
compos-itefilmsduringannealingarepresented[26].InFig.5a,filmposses manyvoids,whichresultsinshortmean-freeandopticalpathsof aphotonyieldingverylowIPandItr.Fig.5bshowsafilminwhich
interparticlevoidsdisappearduetoannealing,whichgivesriseto alongmeanfreeandopticalpathinthefilm.Atthisstage,IPand
Itrreachitsmaximumvalues.Finally,Fig.5cpresentsalmost
trans-parentfilmwithnovoidsbutsomeAl2O3background.Atthisstage,
filmhaslowIPbuthighItrbecausethemeanfreepathisverylong
buttheopticalpathisshort. 3.1. Filmformationmechanisms 3.1.1. Voidclosure
InordertoquantifythebehaviorofIPbelowThandItrabove
T0 inFigs.2and 3,aphenomenologicalvoidclosuremodelcan
beintroduced.Latexdeformationandvoidclosurebetween par-ticles canbeinduced by shearingstress which isgenerated by surface tensionof thepolymer,i.e. polymer–airinterfacial ten-sion.Thevoidclosurekineticscandeterminethetimeforoptical transparencyandlatexfilmformation[32].Inordertorelatethe shrinkageofsphericalvoidofradius,r,totheviscosityofthe sur-roundingmedium,,anexpressionwasderivedandgivenbythe followingrelation[32]. dr dt =− 2
1 (r) (1) whereisthesurfaceenergy,tistimeand(r)istherelative den-sity.IthastobenotedthatherethesurfaceenergycausesadecreaseFig.3.PlotofItr,IscandIPintensitiesversusannealingtemperature,TforLgPS/Al2O3compositefilmswith0(pure),1,5and10layersofAl2O3.Numbersoneachcurveshows
Fig.4. SEMimagesof(a)SmPS/Al2O3and(b)LgPS/Al2O3compositefilmswith1,5and10layersofAl2O3afterextractionofPStemplatewithtoluene.
in void size and the term (r) varies with the microstructural characteristicsofthematerial,suchasthenumberofvoids,the ini-tialparticlesizeandpacking.Eq.(1)issimilartoonethatwasused toexplainthetimedependenceoftheminimumfilmformation temperatureduringlatexfilmformation[33,34].Iftheviscosityis constantintime,integrationofEq.(1)givestherelationas
t=−2 r
ro (r)dr (2)wherer0istheinitialvoidradiusattimet=0.Thedependenceofthe
viscosityofpolymermeltontemperatureisaffectedbythe over-comingoftheforcesofmacromolecularinteraction,whichenables thesegmentsofpolymerchaintojumpoverfromone equilibra-tionpositiontoanother.Thisprocesshappensattemperaturesat whichthefreevolume becomeslargeenoughandis connected withtheovercomingofthepotentialbarrier.Frenkel–Eyringtheory producesthefollowingrelationforthetemperaturedependenceof viscosity[35,36] = N0h V exp
G kT (3)where N0 is Avogadro’s number, h is Planck’s constant, V is
molar volume and k is Boltzmann’sconstant. It is known that G=H−TS,soEq.(3)canbewrittenas
=A exp
HkT
(4)
whereHistheactivationenergyofviscousflow,i.e.theamount ofheatwhichmustbegiventoonemoleofmaterialtocreatethe actofajumpduringviscousflow;Sistheentropyofactivationof viscousflow.HereArepresentsaconstantfortherelated param-etersthatdonotdependontemperature.CombiningEqs.(2)and (4),thefollowingusefulequationisobtained
t=−2A exp
H kT r or (r)dr (5)Inordertoquantifytheaboveresults,Eq.(5)canbeemployed byassumingthattheinterparticlevoidsareequalinsizeandthe
Fig.5.CartoonrepresentationofPS/Al2O3filmsatseveralannealingsteps.(a)Film
possesmanyvoidsthatresultsinverylowIPandItr,(b)interparticlevoidsdisappear
duetoannealing,IPreachesitsmaximumvalue,and(c)transparentfilmwithno
voidsbutsomeAl2O3backgroundandhaslowIPbuthighItr.
number of voids stays constant during film formation (i.e. (r)≈r−3),ThenintegrationofEq.(5)givestherelation
t= 2AC exp
H kT1 r2− 1 r2 o (6) whereCisaconstantrelatedtorelativedensity(r).Aswestated before, decreasein void size(r) causesanincrease in IP.Ifthe
assumptionis madethatIP is inverselyproportional tothe6th
powerofvoidradius,r,thenEq.(6)canbewrittenas t= 2AC exp
H kTI1/3 (7)
herero−2isomittedfromtherelationsinceitisverysmall
com-paredtor−2valuesaftervoidclosureprocessesarestarted.Eq.(7) canbesolvedforIPandItr(=I)tointerprettheresultsinFigs.2and3
as I(T)=S(t) exp
−3H kT (8) whereS(t)=(t/2AC)3.ForagiventimethelogarithmicformofEq.(8)canbewrittenasfollows ln I(T)=ln S(t)−
3HkT
(9) Asitwasalreadyarguedabovethat,theincreaseinbothIPand
Itroriginateduetothevoidclosureprocess,thenEq.(9)wasapplied
toItraboveT0andtoIPbelowThforallfilmsamplesintwoseries.
Fig.6presentsthelnIPversusT−1andFig.7presentslnItrversus
T−1 plots forSmPS/Al2O3 filmseriesfromwhichHPand Htr
Fig.6. Theln(IP)versusT−1plotsofthedatainFig.2forSmPS/Al2O3composite
filmcontain(a)0(pure),(b)1,(c)5and(d)10layersofAl2O3.Theslopeofthe
straightlinesonrightandlefthandsideofthegraphproduceHPandEactivation
energies,respectively.
Fig.7.Theln(Itr)versusT−1plotsofthedatainFig.2forSmPS/Al2O3compositefilm
contains(a)0(pure),(b)1,(c)5and(d)10layersofAl2O3.Theslopeofthestraight
linesproducesHtr.
activationenergieswereobtained.Similarfittingswerealsodone forLgPS/Al2O3 filmseriesandthemeasuredHPandHtr
acti-vationenergiesarelistedinTable1forbothseries.Itisseenthat HPvalues,exceptforpureSmPSandLgPSfilms,forbothseries
donotchangemuchbyincreasingtheAl2O3layershowingthatthe
amountofheatthatwasrequiredbyonemoleofpolymericmaterial toaccomplishajumpduringviscousflowdoesnotchangeby vary-ingtheAl2O3layersonthelatexfilms.Inaddition,Htrvaluesof
bothfilmseriesalsodonotchangemuch.Ithastobenotedthatthe measuredactivationenergiesforviscousflowprocesswerefound tobedifferentindifferenttechniques.Thisdifferencemost proba-blyoriginatesfromdifferenttechniquesandsecondonemeasures thefilmformationfromtheinnerlatexes.Sincepyrenesarelabeled toPSchain,itisbelievedthatHPvaluesaremorerealisticto
inter-prettheviscousflow.Ontheotherhand,Htrvalueswereobtained
indirectlycomparedtoHPvalues.Whencomparingthe
activa-tionenergiesofbothseries,itisseenthatHvaluesofLgPS/Al2O3
seriesarelargerthanthoseofSmPS/Al2O3series.Thisimpliesthat
Table1
ExperimentallyproducedactivationenergiesofSmPS/Al2O3andLgPS/Al2O3filmseries.
Al2O3layer SmPS/Al2O3 LgPS/Al2O3
HP(kcalmol−1) Htr(kcalmol−1) E(kcalmol−1) HP(kcalmol−1) Htr(kcalmol−1) E(kcalmol−1)
0 2.5 2.2 7.5 2.2 10.6 12.6 1 1.2 0.8 3.2 3.1 8.2 3.6 3 1.7 0.6 3.4 2.2 4.9 5.8 5 2.2 1.0 7.7 3.0 6.1 7.1 8 2.7 0.8 6.0 2.5 7.2 4.6 10 0.9 0.8 10.0 2.2 6.7 8.7 15 1.5 1.1 7.8 2.4 8.3 5.1
size.Withsmallerdiameter(i.e.203nm),theSmPSparticleshave largersurfaceareaorsurfacefreeenergy.Thedrivingforceforfilm formationisproportionaltotheinverseoftheparticlesize, accord-ingtothedescriptionsoffilmformationdrivenbycapillaryforces [30].Thegreatercurvatureandhighersurfaceareaofsmallparticles areexpectedtoencouragefilmformation.Thespecificsurfacearea orthetotalsurfaceenergyofSmPSparticles(diameter203nm)is muchlargerthanthatofLgPSparticles(diameter382nm).Astheir totalsurfaceenergyismuchlessthanthatofSmPSparticles,LgPS particlerequireshigherenergytocompleteviscousflowprocess.
3.1.2. Healingandinterdiffusion
ThedecreaseinIP wasalreadyexplainedinprevioussection,
byinterdiffusion of polymerchains.As theannealing tempera-tureisincreasedabovemaxima,somepartofthepolymerchains maycrossthejunctionsurfaceandparticleboundariesdisappear, asaresultIP decreasesduetotransparencyofthefilm.Inorder
toquantifytheseresults,thePrager–Tirrell(PT)model[37,38]for thechaincrossingdensitycanbeemployed.Theseauthorsusedde Gennes’s“reptation”modeltoexplainconfigurationalrelaxationat thepolymer–polymerjunctionwhereeachpolymerchainis con-sideredtobeconfinedtoatubeinwhichexecutesarandomback andforthmotion[39]Thetotal“crossingdensity”(t)(chainsper unitarea)atjunctionsurfacethenwascalculatedfromthe con-tributions1(t)duetochainsstillretainingsomeportionoftheir initialtubes,plusaremainder2(t)i.e.contributioncomesfrom chainswhichhaverelaxedatleastonce.Intermsofreducedtime =2 t/N2thetotalcrossingdensitycanbewrittenas[40]
() (∞)=2
−1/21/2 (10)
where andNarethediffusioncoefficientandnumberoffreely jointedsegmentofpolymerchain[37].
Inordertocompareourresultswiththecrossingdensity of thePTmodel,thetemperaturedependenceof()/(∞)canbe modeledbytakingintoaccountthefollowingArrheniusrelation forthelineardiffusioncoefficient
= o exp
−E kT (11) hereEisdefinedastheactivationenergyforbackbonemotion dependingonthetemperatureinterval.CombiningEqs.(10)and (11)ausefulrelationisobtainedas() (∞)=Ro exp
−E 2kT (12) whereRo=(8 ot/N2)1/2isatemperatureindependentcoefficient.ThedecreaseinIPinFigs.2and3aboveThisalreadyrelatedtothe
disappearanceofparticle–particleinterface.Asannealing tempera-tureincreased,morechainsrelaxedacrossthejunctionsurfaceand asaresultthecrossingdensityincreases.Now,itcanbeassumed
thatIP isinverselyproportionaltothecrossingdensity(T)and
thenthephenomenologicalequationcanbewrittenas IP(∞)=R−10 exp
E 2kBT (13) Theactivationenergyofbackbonemotion,Eisproducedby least-squaresfittingthedatainFig.6(thelefthandside)toEq. (13)andarelistedinTable1.TheEvaluesforeachseriesseems almostnottochangewithincreasingAl2O3contentshowingthatinterdiffusionprocessis notaffectedbyAl2O3 content.
Further-more,EvaluesforLgPS/Al2O3seriesareslightlylargerthanthatof
SmPS/Al2O3series.Thepolymerchainscontainmorefreevolume
andlessinteractionbetweensegmentsinSmPSparticlesleading tohigherconformationalenergyandlessinteractionofpolymer chains[31,41].PolymerchainsintheSmPSparticleareinahighly confinedstatebecauseofthespatiallimitationcomparedtothat oftherandom-coilstate[31]inLgPSparticles.Thisisthemajor reasonfortheSmPSparticlesneedlessenergytoaccomplish inter-diffusionprocessincomparisonwithLgPSparticlesincomposite films.
4. Conclusions
Inthisstudy,weemployedthesteadystatefluorescence(SSF) techniqueinconjugationwithUVVandSEMtechniquestostudy filmformationprocessofPS/Al2O3nanocompositesand
morpho-logicalchangesdependingonPSparticlesizeandAl2O3content.
Theresultsshowedthatfilmformationprocessofboth compos-itefilmserieswasunaffectedbytheAl2O3contentsincethefilm
formationhasoccurredontopoftheAl2O3coveredparticles
dur-ingannealing. However,activationenergy values ofLgPS/Al2O3
serieswerefoundslightlylargerthanSmPS/Al2O3serieswhichcan
beexplained byPSsizeeffect.ExtractionofPSproducedhighly orderedporousstructuresforhighAl2O3contentinbothfilmseries.
ThemeasurementobtainedfromtheSEMshowedthatthepore sizeandporositycouldbeeasilytailoredbyvaryingthePSparticle sizeandtheAl2O3content.Theresultsalsoshowedthatthereisa
goodcorrespondencebetweentheopticaldataandSEMimages. Thesefindings provide insight intotheprinciple mechanism of latexfilmformationininorganicoxide-basedsystems.Thus,our studypresentsusefulinformationsandideasaboutthekineticsof filmformationincompositesystems.Ontheotherhand,similar observationswasreportedpreviouslybyHollandetal.,where tita-nia,zirconia,andaluminawereusedtoconstructhighlyordered periodic3Darraysofmacroporous,usingPSlatexspheresas tem-plates [42,43].In Holland’swork,correspondingmetalalkoxide precursorspermeatethroughPSspheresinroomtemperature,then closepacked,open-porestructureswith320to360nmvoidswere producedaftercalcinationsoftheorganiccomponentat575◦C. Besidesdip-coatingandfilm formationmodeling,themain dif-ferencebetweenourworkandtheirpresentationcomesfromthe dissolutionofPStemplateusingtoluenetoproduceorderedpore structurefromhighAl2O3contentcomposites.Inconclusion,the
whichcouldhaveapplicationsinareasrangingfromquantum elec-tronicstophotocatalysistobatterymaterials.
Acknowledgment
Dr.SunaywouldliketothanktheLaboratoriesinPhysics Depart-mentofITU,whereshehasdonetheexperimentalworkduringher Ph.D.studies,haveusedtopreparethismanuscript.
References
[1]P.R. Sperry, B.S. Synder, M.L. O’Dowd, P.M. Lesko, Langmuir 10 (1994) 2619–2628.
[2]S.Mazur,Coalescenceofpolymerparticles,in:N.Rosenweig(Ed.),Polymer PowderProcessing,Wiley,NewYork,NY,1995.
[3]J.K.Mackenzie,R.Shutlewort,Proc.Phys.Soc.62(1949)833–852. [4]J.W.Vanderhoff,Br.Polym.J.2(1970)161–173.
[5]D.M.Vaessen,F.A.Ngantung,M.L.B.Palacio,L.F.Francis,A.V.McCormick,J.Appl. Polym.Sci.84(2001)2784–2793.
[6]D.M.Vaessen,A.V.McCormick,L.F.Francis,Polymer43(2002)2267–2277. [7]D.Wang,H.Mohwald,J.Mater.Chem.14(2004)459–468.
[8]A.D.Dinsmore,M.F.Hsu,M.G.Nikolaides,M.Marquez,A.R.Bausch,D.A.Weitz, Science298(2002)1006–1009.
[9]E.Chomski,G.A.Ozin,Adv.Mater.12(2000)1071–1078.
[10]J.H.Moon,S.Kim,G.-R.Yi,Y.-H.Lee,S.-M.Yang,Langmuir20(2004)2033–2035. [11]T.Yamasaki,T.Tsutsui,Appl.Phys.Lett.72(1998)1957–1959.
[12]Yu.A.Vlasov,N.Yao,D.J.Norris,Adv.Mater.11(1999)165–169. [13]Y.A.Vlasov,X.Z.Bo,J.C.Sturm,D.J.Norris,Nature414(2001)289–293. [14]J.Wijnhoven,W.L.Vos,Science281(1998)802–804.
[15]J.Sánchez-Valente,X.Bokhimi,F.Hernández,Langmuir19(2003)3583–3588. [16]Y.Tokudome,K.Fujita,K.Nakanishi,K.Miura,K.Hirao,ChemMater.19(2007)
3393–3398.
[17]DianranYan,JiningHe,XiangzhiLi,YangaiaLiu,JianxinZhang,HuiliDing,Surf. Coat.Technol.141(2001)1–6.
[18]Yi-ShungChaug,NripenRoy,Vac.Sci.Technol.7(1989)1303–1304. [19]R.K.Nahar,V.K.Khanna,Int.J.Electron.52(1982)557–567.
[20]Yi-ShungChaug,NripenRoy,ThinSolidFilms193–194(1990)959–974. [21]M.Aguiler-Fruits,M.Garcia,C.Falcony,G.Plesch,S.Jimenez-Sandoval,Thin
SolidFilms389(2001)200–206.
[22]S.Mansour,A.I.Robaee,G.N.Subbanna,K.NarasimhaRao,S.Mohan,Vacuum 45(1994)97–102.
[23]S.Maniv,W.D.Westwod,J.Vac.Sci.Technol.17(1980)743–751. [24]J.S.Liu,J.F.Feng,M.A.Winnik,J.Chem.Phys.101(1994)9096–9103. [25]M.Canpolat,Ö.Pekcan,J.Polym.Sci.Polym.Phys.Ed.34(1996)691–698. [26]S.Ugur,M.S.Sunay,A.Elaissari,F.Tepehan,O.Pekcan,Polym.Compos.27
(2006)651–659.
[27]J.L.Keddie,P.Meredith,R.A.L.Jones,A.M.Donald,Macromolecules28(1995) 2673–2682.
[28]S.T.Eckersley,A.Rudin,J.Coat.Technol.62(1990)89–100.
[29]S.Ugur,A.Elaissari,O.Pekcan,J.ColloidInterfaceSci.263(2003)674–683. [30]J.L.Keddie,Mater.Sci.Eng.R21(1997)101–170.
[31]C.Wu,K.K.Chan,K.F.Woo,R.Qian,X.Li,L.Chen,D.H.Napper,G.Tan,A.J.Hill, Macromolecules28(1995)1592–1597.
[32]J.L.Keddie,P.Meredith,R.A.L.Jones,A.M.Donald,Filmformationinwaterborne coatings,in:T.Provder,M.A.Winnik,M.W.Urban(Eds.),ACSSymp.Ser.648, AmericanChemicalSociety,1996,pp.332–348.
[33]G.B.McKenna,in:C.Booth,C.Price(Eds.),ComprehensivePolymerScience,2, PergamonPress,Oxford,UK,1989.
[34]H.Vogel,Phys.Z.22(1921)645–646.
[35]G.S.Fulcher,J.Am.Ceram.Soc.8(1925)339–355.
[36]J.Frenkel,Viscousflowofcrystallinebodiesundertheactionofsurfacetension, J.Phys.USSR9(1945)385–391.
[37]S.Prager,M.Tirrell,J.Chem.Phys.75(1981)5194–5198.
[38]R.P.Wool,B.L.Yuan,O.J.McGarel,J.Polym.Eng.Sci.29(1989)1340–1367. [39]P.G.deGennes,J.Chem.Phys.76(1982)3322–3326.
[40]Ö.Pekcan,E.Arda,ColloidsSurf.,A153(1999)537–549. [41]X.Qu,Y.Tang,L.Chen,X.Jin,Chin.Sci.Bull.46(2001)991–996. [42]B.T.Holland,C.F.Blanford,A.Stein,Science281(1998)538–540.
[43]B.T.Holland,C.F.Blanford,A.Stein,M.Greenblatt,Chemtracts12(2)(1999) 121–124.