• Sonuç bulunamadı

Spectral properties of discrete klein–gordon s-wave equation with quadratic eigenparameter-dependent boundary condition

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Spectral properties of discrete klein–gordon s-wave equation with quadratic eigenparameter-dependent boundary condition"

Copied!
5
0
0

Yükleniyor.... (view fulltext now)

Tam metin

(1)

https://doi.org/10.1007/s40995-018-00672-3

RESEARCH PAPER

Spectral Properties of Discrete Klein–Gordon s‑Wave Equation

with Quadratic Eigenparameter‑Dependent Boundary Condition

Nihal Yokus1  · Nimet Coskun1

Received: 26 June 2018 / Accepted: 23 December 2018 / Published online: 19 January 2019 © Shiraz University 2019

Abstract

In this study, we consider the spectral analysis of the boundary value problem (BVP) consisting of the discrete Klein–Gordon equation and the quadratic eigenparameter-dependent boundary condition. Presenting the Jost solution and Green’s function, we investigate the finiteness and other spectral properties of the eigenvalues and spectral singularities of this BVP under certain conditions.

Keywords Eigenparameter · Spectral analysis · Eigenvalues · Spectral singularities · Discrete equation · Klein–Gordon equation

1 Introduction

Spectral theory is an extremely rich field of mathematics which has a number of significant application areas from quantum physics to engineering. So, various problems of spectral analysis of differential and difference operators have been investigated in detail (Levitan and Sargsjan 1991; Naimark 1960, 1968).

Investigation of the spectral properties of the some basic differential operators can be traced back to Naimark (1960). He studied the spectrum of the Sturm–Liouville equation considering the boundary value problem (BVP)

where h ∈ ℂ and q is a complex valued function. He showed that the spectrum of this BVP is composed of eigenvalues, spectral singularities and continuous spectrum. He also proved that these eigenvalues and spectral singularities are of finite number with finite multiplicity under certain conditions.

Levitan and Sargsjan (1991) have presented basic prob-lems in the spectral analysis of Sturm–Liouville and one-dimensional Dirac-type operators in their books. In Baira-mov et al. (1997), spectrum of the quadratic pencil of the Schrödinger operator and principal functions correspond-ing to the spectral scorrespond-ingularities were discussed. Bairamov and Coskun (2005) investigated the structure of the discrete spectrum of the system of non-selfadjoint difference equa-tions of first order using the uniqueness theorems of analytic functions. Adıvar (2010) determined the resolvent and Jost solutions of the Schrödinger and Klein–Gordon-type differ-ence operators.

In recent years, spectral analysis of the boundary value problems with eigenparameter-dependent boundary condi-tion has become an attractive research area since they arise in models of certain physical problems such as vibration of a string, quantum mechanics and geophysics (Koprubasi 2014; Koprubasi and Yokus 2014; Bairamov and Yokus 2009; Kir et al. 2005). In such problems, the structure of the Green’s function and resolvent operator differ drastically based upon the eigenparameter-dependent boundary condition.

Note that the equation

is called the Klein–Gordon s-wave equation for a particle of zero mass with static potential Q (Bairamov 2004).

Spectral theory of Klein–Gordon s-wave equation has become main research topic of the papers (Bairamov et al.

1997; Bairamov 2004; Degasperis 1970). In particular, { −y��+ q(x)y − 𝜆2y= 0, x ∈ ℝ +, y(0) − hy(0) = 0, y��+ [𝜆 − Q(x)]2y= 0, x ∈ ℝ+, * Nihal Yokus nyokus@kmu.edu.tr Nimet Coskun cannimet@kmu.edu.tr

1 Department of Mathematics, Karamanoglu Mehmetbey

(2)

Bairamov et al. (1997) obtained the conditions for the poten-tial, under which there exists a finite number of eigenvalues and spectral singularities with finite multiplicities.

The present paper was motivated by the above-mentioned studies.

In this paper, we consider the following BVP

where (an),(vn), n ∈ ℕ are complex sequences, an≠ 0 for

all n ∈ ℕ ∪ {0}, 𝛾0𝛽1− 𝛾1𝛽0≠ 0, ||𝛾2|| +||𝛽2|| ≠ 0 and 𝛾2 ≠ −𝛽1

a0

for 𝛾i, 𝛽i∈ ℂ , i = 0, 1, 2 and 𝜆 is an eigenparameter.

The specific feature of this study is the presence of the spectral parameter not only in the difference equation but also in the boundary condition, which is quadratic.

The remainder of the manuscript is organized as follows: In Sect. 2, we present the Jost solution and Green’s function of the BVP (1.1), (1.2). Section 3 deals with the eigenvalues and spectral singularities of this BVP. In the last part, we investigate the quantitative properties of these eigenvalues and spectral singularities under the condition

2 Solution of (

1.1

), (

1.2

)

Let the condition

is satisfied. It is known from Adıvar (2010) that Eq. (1.1) has the solution

for 𝜆 = 2 cos(z

2

)

, z ∈ ℂ+. Note that the expressions of Knm

and 𝛼n can be written uniquely in terms of

(

an) and (vn). Moreover,

is satisfied for [|||m2||| ]

which is the integer part of m

2 , and C > 0

is a constant. Hence, fn(z) is analytic with respect to z in

+ ∶= {z ∶ z ∈ ℂ, Imz > 0} and continuous in Imz = 0.

We define the function 𝜙 using the boundary condition (1.2) and (2.2) as (1.1) △(an−1△ yn−1)+(vn− 𝜆)2yn= 0, n ∈ ℕ, (1.2) ( 𝛾0+ 𝛾1𝜆 + 𝛾2𝜆2)y 1+ ( 𝛽0+ 𝛽1𝜆 + 𝛽2𝜆2)y 0 = 0 ∑ n∈ℕ exp(𝜖n𝛿)(| |1 − an|| +||vn|| ) < ∞ for 𝜖 > 0 and1 2 ≤ 𝛿 ≤ 1. (2.1) ∑ n∈ℕ n(||1 − an|| +||vn||)< ∞, (2.2) fn(z) = 𝛼neinz ( 1+ ∞ ∑ m=1 Knmeimz2 ) (2.3) | |Knm|| ≤ C ∞ ∑ r=n+[|||m2||| ] (| |1 − ar|| +||vr|| ) ,

The function 𝜙 is analytic in ℂ+, continuous in ℂ+, and 𝜙(z) = 𝜙(z + 4𝜋).

Let ̂𝜑(𝜆) ={𝜑̂n(𝜆)} , and n ∈ ℕ ∪ {0} be the solution of (1.1) subject to the initial conditions

If we define

then 𝜑 is entire function and

Let us define the semi-strips P0 ∶= {z ∶ z ∈ ℂ, z = 𝜉 + i𝜏,

−𝜋≤ 𝜉 ≤ 3𝜋, 𝜏 > 0} and P ∶= P0∪ [−𝜋, 3𝜋]. For all z ∈ P and 𝜙(z) ≠ 0, we define

The function Gnm is introduced as the Green’s function of

the BVP (1.1), (1.2). Obviously, for g =(gm), m ∈ ℕ ∪ {0},

is the resolvent of the BVP (1.1), (1.2).

3 Eigenvalues and Spectral Singularities

of (

1.1

), (

1.2

)

Let us denote the set of eigenvalues and spectral singularities of the BVP (1.1), (1.2) by 𝜎d and 𝜎ss, respectively. From (2.4)

and definition of the eigenvalues and the spectral singulari-ties, we have (2.4) 𝜙(z) =(𝛾0+ 𝛾1𝜆 + 𝛾2𝜆2)f 1(z) + ( 𝛽0+ 𝛽1𝜆 + 𝛽2𝜆2)f 0(z). (2.5) ̂ 𝜑0(𝜆) = 𝛾0+ 𝛾1𝜆 + 𝛾2𝜆2, ̂𝜑 1(𝜆) = − ( 𝛽0+ 𝛽1𝜆 + 𝛽2𝜆2). (2.6) 𝜑(z) = ̂𝜑(2 cosz 2 ) ={𝜑̂n(2 cosz 2 )} , n∈ ℕ ∪ {0}, 𝜑(z) = 𝜑(z + 4𝜋). Gnm(z) ∶= { −𝜑m(z)fn(z) 𝜙(z) , m≤ n,𝜑n(z)fm(z) 𝜙(z) , m > n. (2.7) (Rg)n∶= ∞ ∑ m=0 Gnm(z)gm, n∈ ℕ ∪ {0}, (3.1) 𝜎d={𝜆 ∶ 𝜆 = 2 cosz 2, z∈ P0, 𝜙(z) = 0 } , (3.2) 𝜎ss={𝜆 ∶ 𝜆 = 2 cosz 2, z∈ [−𝜋, 3𝜋], 𝜙(z) = 0 } �{0, 𝜋, 2𝜋}.

(3)

Using (2.2) and (2.4), we obtain

Let

Then, the function 𝜓 is analytic in ℂ+, continuous in ℂ+,

and 𝜙(z) =(𝛾0+ 𝛾1(ei2z + e−i z 2 ) + 𝛾2(eiz+ 2 + e−iz)) × [ 𝛼1eiz+ 𝛼1eiz ∞ ∑ m=1 K1meim2z ] +(𝛽0+ 𝛽1(eiz2+ e−i z 2 ) + 𝛽2(eiz+ 2 + e−iz)) × [ 𝛼0+ 𝛼0 ∞ ∑ m=1 K0meim2z ] = 𝛼0𝛽2e−iz+ 𝛼0𝛽1e−iz2 +(2𝛼 0𝛽2+ 𝛼0𝛽0 ) +(𝛼1𝛾1+ 𝛼0𝛽1)eiz2+(𝛼 0𝛽2+ 2𝛼1𝛾2+ 𝛼1𝛾0 ) eiz +(𝛼1𝛾1)ei3z2 +(𝛼 1𝛾2 ) e2iz + ∞ ∑ m=1 ( 𝛼0𝛽2Kom)eiz ( m 2−1 ) + ∞ ∑ m=1 ( 𝛼0𝛽1Kom)eiz ( m 2− 1 2 ) + ∞ ∑ m=1 ( 2𝛼0𝛽2Kom+ 𝛼0𝛽0Kom+ 𝛼1𝛾2K1m)eizm2 + ∞ ∑ m=1 ( 𝛼1𝛾1K1m+ 𝛼0𝛽1K0m)eiz ( m 2+ 1 2 ) + ∞ ∑ m=1 ( 𝛼1𝛾0K1m+ 2𝛼1𝛾2K1m+ 𝛼0𝛽2Kom)eiz (m 2+1 ) + ∞ ∑ m=1 ( 𝛼1𝛾1K1m)eiz ( m 2+ 3 2 ) + ∞ ∑ m=1 ( 𝛼1𝛾2K1m)eiz ( m 2+2 ) . (3.3) 𝜓(z) = eiz𝜙(z). 𝜓(z) = 𝜓(z + 4𝜋), (3.4) 𝜓(z) = 𝛼0𝛽2+ 𝛼0𝛽1e i2z +(2𝛼0𝛽2+ 𝛼0𝛽0 ) eiz+(𝛼1𝛾1+ 𝛼0𝛽1 ) ei3z2 +(𝛼0𝛽2+ 2𝛼1𝛾2+ 𝛼1𝛾0 ) e2iz+(𝛼1𝛾1 ) ei5z2 +(𝛼 1𝛾2 ) e3iz + ∞ ∑ m=1 ( 𝛼0𝛽2Kom ) eizm2 + ∞ ∑ m=1 ( 𝛼0𝛽1Kom ) eiz ( m 2+ 1 2 ) + ∞ ∑ m=1 ( 2𝛼0𝛽2Kom+ 𝛼0𝛽0Kom+ 𝛼1𝛾2K1m ) eiz ( m 2+1 ) + ∞ ∑ m=1 ( 𝛼1𝛾1K1m+ 𝛼0𝛽1K0m ) eiz ( m 2+ 3 2 ) + ∞ ∑ m=1 ( 𝛼1𝛾0K1m+ 2𝛼1𝛾2K1m+ 𝛼0𝛽2Kom ) eiz ( m 2+2 ) + ∞ ∑ m=1 ( 𝛼1𝛾1K1m ) eiz ( m 2+ 5 2 ) + ∞ ∑ m=1 ( 𝛼1𝛾2K1m ) eiz ( m 2+3 ) . From (3.1)–(3.3), we get

Definition 3.1 The multiplicity of a zero of 𝜓 in P is called the multiplicity of the corresponding eigenvalue or spectral singularity of the BVP (1.1), (1.2).

We can see from (3.5) and (3.6) that we need to inves-tigate the zeros of 𝜓 in P in order to study the quantitative properties of eigenvalues and spectral singularities of the BVP (1.1), (1.2).

Let us define the sets

Let us also introduce all limit points of M1 by M3 and the set

of all zeros of 𝜓 with infinite multiplicity by M4.

It is obvious from (3.5)–(3.7) that

4 Quantitative Properties of Eigenvalues

and Spectral Singularities

Theorem 4.1 If (2.1) holds, then

(i) M1 is bounded and countable,

(ii) M1∩ M3 = �, M1∩ M4= �,

(iii) M2 is compact and 𝜇(M2) = 0 , where 𝜇 is Lebesgue measure in the real axis,

(iv) M3⊂ M2, M4 ⊂ M2; 𝜇(M3) = 𝜇(M4) = 0,

(v) M3⊂ M4.

Proof Using (2.3) and (3.4), we obtain the asymptotic

Boundedness of the set M1 is achieved as a consequence

of (4.1). The function 𝜓 is analytic in ℂ+ and is a 4𝜋

peri-odic function. So, M1 has at most a countable number of

(3.5) 𝜎d={𝜆 ∶ 𝜆 = 2 cosz 2, z∈ P0, 𝜓(z) = 0 } , (3.6) 𝜎ss= { 𝜆 ∶ 𝜆 = 2 cos z 2, z∈ [−𝜋, 3𝜋], 𝜓(z) = 0 } �{0, 𝜋, 2𝜋}. (3.7) M1∶={z∶ z ∈ P0, 𝜓(z) = 0}, M2∶={z ∶ z ∈ [−𝜋, 3𝜋]�{0, 𝜋, 2𝜋}, 𝜓(z) = 0}. (3.8) 𝜎d={𝜆 ∶ 𝜆 = 2 cosz 2, z∈ M1 } , (3.9) 𝜎ss={𝜆 ∶ 𝜆 = 2 cosz 2, z∈ M2 } . (4.1) 𝜓(z) = { 𝛼0𝛽2+ O(e𝜏 2 ) , 𝛽2≠ 0, z ∈ P, 𝜏 → ∞, 𝛼0𝛽1ei2z + O(e−𝜏), 𝛽 2= 0, z ∈ P, 𝜏 → ∞.

(4)

elements. This proves (i). (ii)–(iv) is obtained from the boundary uniqueness theorems of analytic functions (Dolz-henko 1979). From the continuity of all derivatives of 𝜓 on

[−𝜋, 3𝜋], we find (v). □

As a consequence of Theorem 4.1, (3.8) and (3.9), we get the following theorem.

Theorem 4.2 If (2.1) is satisfied, then

(i) the set of eigenvalues of the BVP (1.1), (1.2) is

bounded, has at most a countable number of ele-ments, and its limit points can lie only in [−2, 2].

(ii) 𝜎ss ⊂ [−2, 2] and 𝜇(𝜎ss) = 0.

Assume

for the complex sequences (an),(vn) and for some 𝜀 > 0. Theorem 4.3 If (4.2) holds, then the BVP (1.1), (1.2) has a

finite number of eigenvalues and spectral singularities with a finite multiplicity.

Proof Using (2.3), we get the inequality

where B > 0 is a constant. From the expression of the func-tion 𝜓(z) in (3.4), its analytic continuation can be obtained to the half-plane Imz > −𝜀

2. Since 𝜓 is 4𝜋 periodic function,

the accumulation points of its zeros cannot be on the interval [−𝜋, 3𝜋]. We have already got that the bounded sets M1 and

M2 have a finite number of elements. If we use the

analytic-ity of 𝜓 in Imz > −𝜀

2 , we get that all zeros of 𝜓 in P have a

finite multiplicity. Hence, finiteness of the eigenvalues and spectral singularities of the BVP (1.1), (1.2) is obtained.

□ Let us consider the condition

We can see that analytic continuation of 𝜓 is achieved from real axis to lower half-plane for the condition (4.2). How-ever, this is not the case for the condition (4.3). Therefore, we need to use a different technique to prove the finiteness of the eigenvalues and spectral singularities of the BVP (1.1), (1.2). We will employ the following theorem and investigate if the conditions of Pavlov’s theorem (Pavlov 1967) is valid or not for our case.

(4.2) sup n∈ℕ [ exp(𝜀n)(||1 − an|| +||vn||)]< ∞, | |Knm|| ≤ B exp [ −𝜀 4(n + m) ] , n, m∈ ℕ (4.3) sup n∈ℕ [ exp(𝜀n𝛿)(||1 − an|| +||vn|| )] < ∞, 𝜀 > 0, 1 2 ≤ 𝛿 < 1.

Theorem 4.4 Let us assume that the function u is analytic

in ℂ+ , all of its derivatives are continuous up to the real axis and there exists T > 0 such that

and

If the set Q with linear Lebesgue measure zero is the set of all zeros of the function u is with infinite multiplicity, and if

where F(s) = infn(Cnsn∕n!) , n = 0, 1, 2, … , 𝜇(Qs) is the

lin-ear Lebesgue measure of s-neighborhood of Q and h is an arbitrary positive constant, then u(z) = 0.

The function 𝜓 is analytic in ℂ+ and infinitely

differenti-able on the real axis under condition (4.3). Using Theo-rem 4.4, (2.3) and (3.4), we get

where

The following estimation is obtained for 𝜂k

where D and d are constants depending on C, 𝜀 and 𝛿.

Theorem 4.5 If (4.3) satisfies, then M4 = �.

Proof From Theorem 4.4, we see that | | |u (n) (z)|||≤ Cn, n= 0, 1, … , z ∈ ℂ+,|z| < 2T, | | | | | | | T ∫ −∞ ln|u(x)| 1+ x2 dx | | | | | | | < ∞, | | | | | | | ∞ ∫ T ln|u(x)| 1+ x2 dx | | | | | | | < ∞. h ∫ 0 ln F(s)d𝜇(Qs) = −∞, | | |𝜓 (k) (z)|||≤ 𝜂k, k∈ ℕ ∪ {0}, 𝜂k= 4kC ∞ ∑ m=1 mkexp(−𝜀m𝛿). (4.4) 𝜂k≤ 4kC ∞ � 0 xkexp(−𝜀x𝛿)dx≤ Ddkk!kk1−𝛿 𝛿 , (4.5) 𝜔 ∫ 0 ln t(s)d𝜇(Gs) > −∞,

(5)

where t(s) = inf

k 𝜂ksk

k! , k ∈ ℕ ∪ {0}, 𝜇(M4,s) is the Lebesgue

measure of the s-neighborhood of M4 and 𝜂k is defined by

(4.4).

Now we have

by (4.4). From (4.5) and (4.6), we get

Since 𝛿

1−𝛿 ≥ 1, (4.7) holds for arbitrary s if and only if 𝜇(M4,s) = 0 or M4= �. □

Theorem 4.6 If (4.3) holds, then the BVP (1.1), (1.2) has a

finite number of eigenvalues and spectral singularities, and each of them is of finite multiplicity.

Proof We need to show that the function 𝜓(z) has a finite number of zeros with a finite multiplicities in P. Theo-rem 4.1 and Theorem 4.5 imply that M3 = M4= �. Thus, the

bounded sets M1 and M2 do not have accumulation points,

i.e., 𝜓(z) has only finite number of zeros in P. Since M4= �,

these zeros are of finite multiplicity. □

Acknowledgements The authors would like to express their thanks to the reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions.

(4.6) t(s)≤ D exp{−1− 𝛿 𝛿 e −1d1−𝛿𝛿 s1−𝛿𝛿 } , (4.7) 𝜔 ∫ 0 s𝛿 1−𝛿d𝜇(M 4,s) < ∞.

References

Adıvar M (2010) Quadratic pencil of difference equations: Jost solutions, spectrum, and principal vectors. Quaest Math 33(3):305–323

Bairamov E (2004) Spectral properties of the nonhomogeneous Klein– Gordon s-wave equations. Rocky Mt J Math 34:1–11

Bairamov E, Coskun C (2005) The structure of the spectrum of a sys-tem of difference equations. Appl Math Lett 18(4):387–394 Bairamov E, Yokus N (2009) Spectral singularities of Sturm-Liouville

problems with eigenvalue-dependent boundary conditions. Abstr Appl Anal. https ://doi.org/10.1155/2009/28959 6

Bairamov E, Çakar Ö, Celebi AO (1997) Quadratic pencil of schrödinger operators with spectral singularities: discrete spec-trum and principal functions. J Math Anal Appl 216(1):303–320 Degasperis A (1970) On the inverse problem for the Klein–Gordon

s-wave equation. J Math Phys 11(2):551–567

Dolzhenko EP (1979) Boundary-value uniqueness theorems for ana-lytic functions. Math Notes Acad Sci USSR 25(6):437–442 Kir E, Bascanbaz-Tunca G, Yanik C (2005) Spectral properties of a

non selfadjoint system of differential equations with a spectral parameter in the boundary condition. Proyecciones (Antofagasta) 24(1):49–63

Koprubasi T (2014) Spectrum of the quadratic eigenparameter depend-ent discrete Dirac equations. Adv Differ Equ 2014(1):148 Koprubasi T, Yokus N (2014) Quadratic eigenparameter dependent

discrete Sturm–Liouville equations with spectral singularities. Appl Math Comput 244:57–62

Levitan BM, Sargsjan IS (1991) Sturm–Liouville and Dirac opera-tors. Translated from the Russian mathematics and its applications (Soviet series), vol. 59

Naimark MA (1960) Investigation of the spectrum and the expansion in eigenfunctions of a nonselfadjoint differential operator of the second order on a semi-axis. Am Math Soc Transl 2(16):103–193 Naimark MA (1968) Linear differential operators: part II: linear dif-ferential operators in Hilbert space with additional material by the author. F. Ungar Publishing Company, New York

Pavlov BS (1967) The non-self-adjoint schrodinger operator I, II, III, topics in math. Phys Consult Bur NY 1968:1969

Referanslar

Benzer Belgeler

Its deliverables in principle included a cash payment to persons whose drinking water was affected, health education and community projects for the benefit of the plaintiff class,

Such a connection between Kalman filtering and boundary value problems arise in cases when the noises involved to the Kalman filtering problem are delayed in time2. A delay of noises

596 When students’ responses were examined, none of the students gave correct answer (correct sequencing-correct explanation) in the pre test while thirteen students responded in

Ankilozan spondilitli hastalarda TNF-α blokeri ile tedavi sonrası ortalama ESH (p=0,018) ve CRP (p=0,039) düzeyleri tedavi öncesine göre anlamlı olarak düşük saptandı..

Bu çalışmada sulama düzeyi ve sulama suyu tuzluluğunun kekik bitkisinde büyüme (bitki boyu), verim parametreleri (toplam yaş ve kuru ağırlıklar, yaprak ve

Ding vd (2009) tarafından yapılan benzer bir çalışmada ise kloramfenikol ilaç maddesi ile HSA arasındaki etkileşim Δλ değeri 60 nm dalga boyunda iken

Based on the structures of the backbone and access networks, this problem is called 2-edge connected/star network design problem or 2-edge connected/star subgraph problem (2ECSSP

Query by image content is the searching of images based on the common, intrin­ sic and high-level properties such as color, texture, shape of objects captured in the images and