• Sonuç bulunamadı

On solutions of the difference equation x_{n+1}=(((-1)?x_{n-4})/(1+(-1)?x_{n}x_{n-1}x_{n-2}x_{n-3}x_{n-4}))

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "On solutions of the difference equation x_{n+1}=(((-1)?x_{n-4})/(1+(-1)?x_{n}x_{n-1}x_{n-2}x_{n-3}x_{n-4}))"

Copied!
6
0
0

Yükleniyor.... (view fulltext now)

Tam metin

(1)

Selçuk J. Appl. Math. Selçuk Journal of Vol. 8. No.1. pp. 51- 56 , 2007 Applied Mathematics

On Solutions Of The Difference Equation+1= (−1)

−4

1+(−1)

−1−2−3−4

Ramazan Karatas

Selcuk University Education Faculty 42090 Meram Konya Turkey e-mail:rkaratas@ selcuk.edu.tr

Received : December 27, 2006

Summary.We study the solutions and attractivity of the difference equation

+1= (−1)  −4 1 + (−1) −1−2−3−4   = 0 1 2 

where −11 −10  −2 −1 0 ∈ (0 ∞)and 0 are real numbers such that

0−1−2−3−46= ±1

Key words:Difference Equation, Solutions, Periodical. 1. Introduction

A lot of work has been done concerning the attractivity and solutions of the rational difference equations, for example in [1-7]. In [1] Aloqeili investigated the solutions, stability character, semi-cycle behavior of the difference equation +1=−−1

−1 where −1 0∈    0 and gave the following formula

= ⎧ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎨ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎩ 0  2 Q =1 2−1(1−)−(1−2−1) −10 2(1−)−(1−2) −10    −1 +1 2 Q =0 2−1(1−)−(1−2 )−10 2+1(1−)−(1−2+1) −10   

In [3], Cinar studied the positive solutions of the difference equation +1=1+−1

−1 for  = 0 1 2  and proved by the formula induction .

= ⎧ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎨ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎩ −1 [(+1)2]−1Y =0 (2−10+1) [(+1)2]−1Y =0 ((2+1)−10+1) for n odd, 0 2 Y =1 ((2−1)−10+1) 2 Y =1 (2−10+1) for n is even. 

(2)

In [5], Stevic studied the stability properties of the solutions of Cinar’s equa-tion. Also in [6], Stevic investigated the solutions of the difference equation +1=+−1 and gave the formulas

2= 0 Ã 1 − 1  P =1 2Y−1 =1 1 1+ ! , 2+1= −1 Ã 1 − 0 1+0  P =0 2 Y =1 1 1+ ! .

Moreover, in [2] Aloqeili generalized the results from [3,5] to the kth order case and investigated the solutions, stability character and semicycle behavior of the difference equation +1= +−

− where −  0 0 and   0 

being any positive integer.

Our aim in this paper is to investigate the solutions of the difference equation

(1.1) +1= (−1)  −4 1 + (−1) −1−2−3−4 for  = 0 1 2  where

−4 −3 −2 −1 and 0 are real numbers such that 0−1−2−3−46= ±1

First, we give a few definitions which will be useful in our investigation of the behavior of solutions of Eq.(1.1).

Definition 1. Let I be an interval of real numbers and let  : 5 →  be a

continuously differentiable function. Then for every −∈  ( = 0 1 2 3) the difference equation +1 =  ( −1 −2 −3 −4)  = 0 1 2  has a

unique solution {}∞=−4

Definition 2.The equilibrium point  of the equation +1=  ( −1  −),

 = 0 1 2  is the point that satisfies the condition  =  (  ) Definition 3.A solution{}∞=− of a difference equation

+1=  ( −1  −)

is periodic if there exists a positive integer p such that +=  The smallest

such positive integer p is called the prime period of the solution of the difference equation.

2.Main Results

Theorem 1. Assume that 0−1−2−3−4 6= ±1 and let {}∞=−4 be a

solution of Eq.(1.1). Then for  = 0 1 2  all solutions of Eq.(1.1) are of the form

(3)

(2.1) 5+1 = ⎧ ⎪ ⎪ ⎨ ⎪ ⎪ ⎩ −4 1+0−1−2−3−4  ≡ 0 (mod 4) −−4  ≡ 1 (mod 4) −4 −1+0−1−2−3−4  ≡ 2 (mod 4) −4  ≡ 3 (mod 4)  (2.2) 5+2 = ⎧ ⎪ ⎪ ⎨ ⎪ ⎪ ⎩ −−3(1 + 0−1−2−3−4)  ≡ 0 (mod 4) −3(1+0−1−2−3−4) −1+0−1−2−3−4  ≡ 1 (mod 4) −3(1 + 0−1−2−3−4)  ≡ 2 (mod 4) −3  ≡ 3 (mod 4)  (2.3) 5+3= ⎧ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎨ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎩ −−2 −1+0−1−2−3−4  ≡ 0 (mod 4) −−2  ≡ 1 (mod 4) −−2 1+0−1−2−3−4  ≡ 2 (mod 4) −2  ≡ 3 (mod 4)  (2.4) 5+4= ⎧ ⎪ ⎪ ⎨ ⎪ ⎪ ⎩ −1(−1 + 0−1−2−3−4)  ≡ 0 (mod 4) −1(−1+0−1−2−3−4) 1+0−1−2−3−4  ≡ 1 (mod 4) −−1(−1 + 0−1−2−3−4)  ≡ 2 (mod 4) −1  ≡ 3 (mod 4)  (2.5) 5+5= ⎧ ⎪ ⎪ ⎨ ⎪ ⎪ ⎩ 0 1+0−1−2−3−4  ≡ 0 (mod 4) −0  ≡ 1 (mod 4) 0 −1+0−1−2−3−4  ≡ 2 (mod 4) 0  ≡ 3 (mod 4) 

Proof.For  = 0, we have following equality from Eq.(1.1) 1= 1+0 −4 −1−2−3−4 2= 1−10−−3 −1−2−3 = −−3 1 1+0−1−2−3−4 = −−3 (1 + 0−1−2−3−4) 3= 1+21−20−1−2 = 1 −2 −−3(1+0−1−2−3−4)1+0−1−2−3−4−4 0−1−2 = −2 1−0−1−2−3−4 4= 1−3−2−110−1 = −−1 1−1−0−1−2−3−4−2 [−−3(1+0−1−2−3−4)]1+0−1−2−3−4−4 0−1 = −1(−1 + 0−1−2−3−4) and 5= 1+430210

(4)

= 0

1+0−1−2−3−4

Similarly, one can easily prove Eqs.(2.1),(2.2),(2.3),(2.4) and (2.5) for  = 1 2 3 Now suppose that > 1 and our assumption holds for ( − 1) We shall show that the result holds for . From our assumption for ( − 1) we have

5−4= ⎧ ⎪ ⎪ ⎨ ⎪ ⎪ ⎩ −4 1+0−1−2−3−4  ≡ 1 (mod 4) −−4  ≡ 2 (mod 4) −4 −1+0−1−2−3−4  ≡ 3 (mod 4) −4  ≡ 0 (mod 4)  5−3= ⎧ ⎪ ⎪ ⎨ ⎪ ⎪ ⎩ −−3(1 + 0−1−2−3−4)  ≡ 1 (mod 4) −3(1+0−1−2−3−4) −1+0−1−2−3−4  ≡ 2 (mod 4) −3(1 + 0−1−2−3−4)  ≡ 3 (mod 4) −3  ≡ 0 (mod 4)  5−2= ⎧ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎨ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎩ −−2 −1+0−1−2−3−4  ≡ 1 (mod 4) −−2  ≡ 2 (mod 4) −−2 1+0−1−2−3−4  ≡ 3 (mod 4) −2  ≡ 0 (mod 4)  5−1= ⎧ ⎪ ⎪ ⎨ ⎪ ⎪ ⎩ −1(−1 + 0−1−2−3−4)  ≡ 1 (mod 4) −1(−1+0−1−2−3−4) 1+0−1−2−3−4  ≡ 2 (mod 4) −−1(−1 + 0−1−2−3−4)  ≡ 3 (mod 4) −1  ≡ 0 (mod 4)  5= ⎧ ⎪ ⎪ ⎨ ⎪ ⎪ ⎩ 0 1+0−1−2−3−4  ≡ 1 (mod 4) −0  ≡ 2 (mod 4) 0 −1+0−1−2−3−4  ≡ 3 (mod 4) 0  ≡ 0 (mod 4)

Then, from Eq.(1.1) and the above equality, for  ≡ 1 (mod 4) we have 5+1= (−1) 5 5−4 1+(−1)5 55−15−25−35−4 = −−4 1+0−1−2−3−4 1−1+0−1−2−3−40−1−2−3−4 = −−4 That is, 5+1= −−4 Also, 5+2= (−1) 5+1 5−3 1+(−1)5+1 5+155−15−25−3 = −−3(1+0−1−2−3−4) 1−0−1−2−3−4  Hence, we have 5+2= −−3 (1 + 0−1−2−3−4) 1 − 0−1−2−3−4 

(5)

Similarly, 5+3= (−1) 5+2 5−2 1+(−1)5+2 5+25+155−15−2 = −2 −1+0−1−2−3−4 1−−1+0−1−2−3−40−1−2−3−4 = −−2 Consequently, we have 5+3= −−2 Similarly, 5+4= (−1) 5+3 5−1 1+(−1)5+3 5+35+25+155−1 = −1(−1+0−1−2−3−4) 1+0−1−2−3−4  That is, 5+4= −1(−1 + 0−1−2−3−4) 1 + 0−1−2−3−4

Now, we prove the last formula for  ≡ 1 (mod 4). Since 5+5= 1−5+45+3−55+25+15 = − 0 1+0−1−2−3−4 1−1+0−1−2−3−40−1−2−3−4 = −0 we have 5+5= −0

Thus, we have proved (2.1), (2.2), (2.3),(2,4) and (2.5) for  ≡ 1 (mod 4). Similarly, one can easily prove (2.1), (2.2), (2.3),(2,4) and (2.5) for  = 4 + 2  = 4 + 3 and  = 4, where  ∈ +

Theorem 2. Eq.(1.1) has two equilibrium points which are 0 and √5

2. Proof.For the equilibrium points of Eq.(1.1) when  is even, we write

 = (1 + 5) Then, we have

6= 0 When  is odd, we write

(6)

5= 2

Thus, the equilibrium points of Eq.(1.1) are 0 and √5

2

Corollary 1.Every solution of Eq.(1.1). is periodic with prime 20. Proof.This is clear from Eqs.(2.1), (2.2), (2.3),(2.4) and (2.5). References

1.Aloqeili, M., Dynamics of a rational difference equation, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 176(2006), 768-774.

2.Aloqeili, M., Dynamics of a kth order rational difference equation, Applied Mathe-matics and Computation, 181(2006), 1328-1335.

3.Cinar, C., On the positive solutions of the difference equation+1= 1+−1−1,

Applied Mathematics and Computation 150(2004), 21-24.

4.Cinar, C., On the positive solutions of the difference equation+1= −1+−1−1,

Applied Mathematics and Computation, 158(2004), 813-816.

5.Stevic, S., More on a rational recurence relation+1=1+−1−1Applied

Math-ematics E-Notes, 4(2004),80-84.

6.Stevic, S., On the recursive sequence+1=(−1)Taiwanese Journal of

Mathe-matics, 6(3)(2002), 405-414.

7.Stevic, S., On the recursive sequence+1=  + −1

 Journal of Applied

Referanslar

Benzer Belgeler

In this paper, an alternative approach to the shifted 1/N expansion technique is introduced to work out the energy eigenvalues of a Klein-Gordon (KG) particle.. We have defined

[r]

[r]

– Unscented Particle Filter, Nonparametric Belief Propagation – Annealed Importance Sampling, Adaptive Importance Sampling – Hybrid Monte Carlo, Exact sampling, Coupling from the

Margerison Ac, Mann JR: Serum copper, serum ceruloplasmin and erythrocyte sedimetation rate meassurements in children with Hodgkin's Disease, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma,

tahmin edicisi  için yeterlidir.. Ayrıca, gösterilebilir ki, T 1 aynı zamanda tam olup, bütün yansız tahmin ediciler arasında en küçük varyansa sahiptir.. Buradan

(i) (1) sisteminin N periyotlu periyodik bir çözüme sahip olmas¬için gerek ve yeter ko¸ sul bir Floquet çarpan¬n¬n 1 olmas¬d¬r. (ii) (1) sisteminin 2N periyotlu periyodik

(2) homogen sisteminin s¬f¬r çözümü düzgün asimptotik kararl¬ise, bu durumda lineer olmayan (1) sisteminin s¬f¬r çözümü