ESTABLISHMENT A N D DEVELOPMENT
OF HOTELS
IN NINETEENTH CENTURY ISTANBUL
A L İ ESAT GÖKSEL
SİNAN KUNERALP
19. YÜZYILDA İSTANBUL'DAKİ OTELLERİ ELE ALAN BU BİLDİRİDE, İSTANBUL'DA ÖZELLİKLE PERA'DAKİ OTEL LER (Kİ BUGÜN PERA PALAS DIŞINDAKİLER YOK OLMUŞ LARDIR) İLE BOĞAZİÇİ VE ADALAR'DAKİ SAYFİYE OTEL LERİ ELE ALINMIŞLARDIR. DAHA GENİŞ BİR ÇALIŞMANIN ÖZETİ OLAN BU BİLDİRİ SOSYAL YAŞAMIMIZA BATI KÜL TÜRÜNDEN NAKLEDİLEN BİR KURUMUN "HOTEL'İN", AYNI ZAMANDA TÜRK MİMARİ YAŞAMINA NASIL BİR SEDAYLA GİRDİĞİNE DİKKATİ ÇEKME ARZUSUNDADIR.
AE/SK
PUBLISHED UNDER THE AUSPICES OF THE "ISTANBUL OTELCÎLİK/TURİZM VE TİCARET AŞ" AND ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR MR. HASAN SÜZER FROM THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1. INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON THE HISTORY OF TURKISH - ISLAMIC SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY HELD
I . INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON THE
HISTORY OF TURKISH-ISLAMIC SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY tTO 14-18 September 1981
ESTABLISHMENT AND DEVELOPMENT OF HOTELS IN 19tb. CENTURY İSTANBUL
A li Esat Göksel,Arcb.M,A. İstanbul D.M,M.A. I'aeulty of Architecture Department of A rcüitectural Design Methods Sinan Hüneralp Historian İs t anb ul-Turkey Sysop's!»
Hcftels in the contemporary sense were establish ed in Istanbul in the la t e 1830’ s . This paper examines the f a c i l i t i e s a v a ila b le to t ra v e lle r s p rio r to th a t'd ate and studies the reasons leading to the opening o f the f i r s t h otels in that decade. Hotels were b a s ic a lly a concept a lie n to the Ottoman society o f that day and they were opened by foreign ers fo r the b e n e fit o'f other fo reig n ers. The paper examines location,management and standarts o f the h otels and there i s a b r ie f p r o f i le o f the a c t iv it ie s o f M ig ird iç Tokatlian an en terprisin g businessman who estab lish ed a small scale h otel empire. There follow s an archytectural an alysis o f the main hotel? b r ie f descriptions o f h otels both down town in Pera and in re s o rt-p la c e s on the Bosphorus and the P rin ce s’ Is la n d s .
The i n i t i a l aim of this paper was to study the arch itectu ral and so c ia l impact o f the appearance during the f i r s t h a lf o f then XIXth. century o f hotels in Istanbul. However as we set out gath ering data we soon discovered how scant the a v a ila b le information was. We therefore had to put up with a le ss ambitious programm by lim itin g ourselves to r a is e a few tentative Questions on a h ith e r to neglected aspect of the urban trasformation o f Istanbul during the past centu ry.(1 )
Hotels provide on a temporary basis lodgings, n ou rrishment and occasionally entertainment. They are therefore in ev itab ly asso ciated with one or another aspect o f tra v e l and t r a v e lle r s . This may be one o f the reasons why such establishments were so la te in appearing in Ottoman Turkey and why they experienced so much hardship in strik in g ro o ts. Indeed, tra v e llin g was u n til very r e cently a concept a lie n to the average Turk who usually contempla ted the very idea of moving around from one place to another with abhorence. O f f ic i a ls sent out on missions to the provinces were able to take advantage of an in t r ic a te system o f corvée, in h erited from the Byzantine whereby the lo c a l notables were to pro vide fre e accomodation to touring representatives o f the central and provin cial adm inistration. (Kudumiye/Tesrifiye) The g e n ttle - man of le isu re who tra v e lle d for pleasure o r _self-improvement was a very rare species and traders bringing th eir wares to the la rg er market-places were catered fo r in the kervansaray or the han. The Western t ra v e lle r s who ventured into the Ottoman East had the choice of eith er with th e ir own nationals who had se ttled lo c a lly or of asking the h o s p ita lity of Orthodox convents or monasteries. Greek monks provided lodgings for t r a v e lle r s w ell up to the 1870's A French guide-book notes that the Greek monks had no excessive pretentions to a u sterity and that they welcomed t r a v e lle r s . Tie monks did not supply food to their guests but on the other hand they were profusely generous with th e ir wine. (2 )
Much has been w ritten on the kervansaray and the han. Let us simply r e c a ll b r ie f ly that a han was .a la rg e , square building usually of stone with a spacious inner court around which store-houses for merchandise were lin ed up. On the upper flo o rs were_to be found sparcely furnished rooms along a vaulted passage b u ilt on columns, th is c irc u la r g a lle r y opened on the inner court. The c lie n t e le of the hans were usually traders and merchants who took a room for themselves on the flo o rs and a depot on the court for their goods. Business was conducted in the han i t s e l f where a l l kinds of com- merci a l transaction took place. Most of the Istanbul hans were d i vided on national lin e s and traders belonging to the same nationa l i t y would congregate in one p a rtic u la r han. The XIXth Century French w riter Gerard de Nerval , for instance, gives an account of one such han frequented mostly by Persian fur merchants. (3) I i s in te re stin g to note that a Greek form o f the Ottoman word, "khani" has come by extention to be used in the sense of a com mon v i lla g e inn. A guide-book gives a v iv id though uninviting des c rip tio n of the amenities o ffe re d by the average Greek Khann in the 18 7 0 's s
Le Khani est un batiment où l ’ on n e trouve que le t o it et le s quatre murs. I l se compose d'une chambre unique® le s f e n e t r e s quant i l yen en a sont à peine fermées par un v o let de b o is, quelquefois un plancher une espèce de l i t de camps, rarement une natte en forment l'ameublement. Les tab le s et surtout le s chaises y sont presque i n connues Le voyageur d o it apporter avec lu i son l i t , ses provisions de bouche. Le landemain on paie au khanci un p rix assez eleve pour un g ît e aussi m auvais"(4). Let us a lso point out that the f i r s t
hotel opened in Edirne in the la te 1860's, the "Auberge de l'E t o i l e was in fact b u ilt on the lin e s o f a tra d itio n a l one-storeyed han with rooms for t r a v e lle r s on the upper flo o r overlooking a square yard with a fountain in the middle. As usual rooms were hardly furnished at a l l and food was not served in the hotel (5 ).
One can therefore assume that h otels are a foreign accretion engraft upon the lo c a l texture. Indeed a travelbook published in 1839 warns the t r a v e lle r s to Istanbul not to expect much as fa r as m aterial comfort goes but adds "to u te fo is l ’ in d ustrie des nations c iv ilis é e s s 'y est largement in s t a llé e s depuis quelques années pour assurer toutes les commodités de l'e x is t e n c e m a te r ie lle . " (6 ) The w riter proceeds to state that among those imported^"commodites" there are several moderately priced and w ell appointed h otels.
Hotels seem to have appeared in Istanbul in the 18JO'S as a re s u lt both o f the increased m obility caused by the extention of steam navigation and o f the opening up o f the Ottoman Empire to foreiqn trade and finance which resulted in an in flu x of wouldTbe entrepreneurs v is it in g the-Ottoman c a p ita l and provinces. Indeed, during the follow ing decades most of the major c it ie s got endowed with one or more establishments providing "ce comfort r e l a t i f que l'o n est bien heureux de rencontrer dans le s p e tite s v i lle s d 'O r- ien t après de longues journées à cheval et le s stations dans les hans ou chez le s pa y san s".(7 )
That these establishments were foreign both in th eir in sp iration and their .inception i s t e s t i f ie d by several fa c to rs, the f i r s t being of a semantic nature. Bianchi’ s French-Turkish Dictionary published in 1846 gives a corrupted form o f an It a lia n word, lo sta riy é as a Turkish equivalent for h otel. The well-known Tur- kish lexicographer, Şemsettin Sami Bey, in h is Kamus-u Türkı published f i f t y years la t e r defines a lo^arrye a s b e in g a small lokanta, another word o f It a lia n o rig in which again according to the Kamus is a place " where foreign ers and t r a v e lle r s may lodqe and obtain n ou rrishment". In h is French-Turkısh D ictiona- rypublished in the same years Şemsettin Sami tran slated hotel with the word m isafirhane. As a second choice he gives a phoneti- cal tra n slite ra tio n in Ottoman of the word h o tel. The Kamu^ de^ _ nes a misafirhane as being an a li a franca bu ilding equipped with a!? the pre-requTsite for comfort and r e s t . I t i s in te re stin g to note that Şemsettin Sami who had adopted the axiom o f Messrs n it tré and Larousse that a diction ary without examples is not a d ic tionary, chose h is with a d e fin ite didactic view. In the en ry for lokanta one can find a statement to the e ffe c t that w e s t a - Ved in a c l ean 1 .” . S im ila rly the example used to i llu s t r a t e the verb konmak , (to stay in a place, to lodge) is a sentence remini- seing strongly o f the kudumiye/teşri fiy e taxess passing through there we stayed at the house o f one o f the lo c a l g en try.'
But enough of lin g u is t ic s . Glancing trough the various l i s t s of h otels that opened in Istanbul and the provinces during the n i neteenth century one fin ds out quickly that these establishments caterinq for Europeans were, owned and run by Europeans. There was also the occasional non-moslem Ottoman. But one has to wait t i l l the 1880's to find a Moslem Ottoman and a Hacı at that, run ning a h otel, one Hacı Ahmet Nun Efendi who owned the Hotel-Res taurant de Roumelie at S irk e c i. One can only speculate in our pre sent state of knowledge that the Hacı may have been a refugee immigre
or an immigrant from one o f the Roumelie Provinces ceded to Aus tria,Romania or Bulgaria and that he may have observed before h is departure the b e n efits o f such establism ents. S t i l l this i s mere speculation as he may a lte rn a tiv e ly chosen the name o f h is hotel because o f the proximity o f the newly opened railw ay station of the Chemins de Fer de Roumelie.
Hotels catering as we have s a ir mainly fo r foreigners were e s t a b li shed in those parts o f Istanbul where these were more numerous. Fera with i t s la rg e community o f resid en t foreign ers and non-moslems had n a tu ra lly pride o f p la c e . in the e a r lie r years some h otels w were a lso established around G alata, The business quarter but th these establishments soon turned seedy and the better c la ss of customers deserted them in favour of the Pera h otels. Likewise t the two v illa g e s on the Bosphorus, BUylikdare and Tarabya with a la rg e and distinguished foreign community were soon to boast o f not a few h o te ls. Hotels were a lso established in the Moda penin sula on the Asian shore where an important English colony had s e ttle d . The English were a lso instrumental in the opening of h otels on the P rin ce s’ Islands when these islan d s were turned into fashionable summer resorts during the 1880's. With the inauguration o f the Sirkeci railw ay sta tio n , several hotels were established close to the station though one does not witness a sim ilar phenomenon with theo opening of the Haydarpaşa station , sta rtin g point o f the Anatolian Railway.
The Pera h otels were u sually to-be found in the proximity o f the foreign embassies and th e ir names bear testimony to the nationa l i t y or the alleg ia n c e o f their owners « Grand-Hotel Français, The Prince o f Wales, Hotel de Breslau, Hotel d'A n g le te rre , de Ro me, d 'Athènes etc. The in e v ita b le Hotel Du Terminus or Hotel de la Gare does not unfortunately appear,among the Sirkeci h o te ls, th eir owners being more imaginative or geographically minded with such names as Hotel d'Europe,de S o fia , d'andrinople though a French widow run a H otel-R estaurant-Brasserie deschemins de Fers Orientaux ju st opposite the sta tio n .
These h otels were la t e r a lly small foreign enclaves where n ation als o f one country wouflid gather to partake o f th e ir own food,wine and most important read th eir newspaper in the cabinet de lecture put at the disposal o f th e ir customers by most h o te ls. Germans, Ausfe tria n s , Hungarians It a lia n s and the French had th eir own h o tels. There was even one h otel fo r Central European Jews which adver tise d in the Beadeker that Yiddish was spoken. Advertisements re fle c te d nation al preferences with French-owned hotels putting emphasis on the cuisin e fra n ç a ise , bon v in " theme. Though many h otels were establish ed a fte r the 1840's these were u sually small a f f a i r s in converted private houses with a room capacity averaging 20-30 per establishment and f a i r l y poor stan - darts. There are two c o n flic tin g statements which seem to in d ic a te that eith er a certain d e terioration did take place as the num ber o f h otels increased in the 1860's or that the customers have learned to be more demanding. Lacroix wrote in 1839 that the Pera h otels are reasonably priced and that they o f f e r adequate se rvic e .
On the other hand Isambert w ritin g some 35 years la te rs i s more severe or more discrim inate i he complains o f the predatoryness o f h otel owners whom he accuses o f over-charging th eir rooms. He goes as fa r as suggesting to the would-be t r a v e lle r to take up
rooms with private in d iv id u a ls as being both cheaper and more convenient. The same Isambert a lso reg re ts that there are no h otels i n the old part o f Istanbul and suggests that Ottoman kon- aks be turned into h o ste ls fo r to u ris ts as i t had su c ce sfu lly be en done in Damascus. ( I t i s refre sh in g to see that there i s no thing new under the sky when one reads o f the e f fo r t s o f the present day Turkish M in istry o f Tourism in the same d ire c tio n . As a matter o f fa c t one has to w ait t i l l the 1880’ s and the 1890's to see comparatively la rg e h otels opening in Istanbul a fte r the great f i r e o f 1870 and the earthquake o f 1894 which de vastated a great portion o f the wboden part o f Pera. Houses and bu ildin gs were reconstructed in stone a ft e r these two calam ities»
(Heretofore a l l the guidebooks were unanimous in advising t r a v e lle r s to take up residence in preference in stone b u ild in g s. The réglement o f the Hotel d ’ Angleterre , one o f the oldest in the c ity expressly porbad smoking in the rooms.)
The Pera Palace with 150 rooms, run by the Société des W agons-lits Internationaux, the to k a tlia n with 100 rooms, the B r is t o l, the Kroeker and tha Hotel de Londres each with 80 rooms werev e s t a b li shed at various dates in the 1880's and 1890’ s . But standarts must s t i l l not have improved much as by 1910 only one h otel in Istanbul, the Grand Hotel Continental e t Français was recommended by the Touring Club de France, with the reorgan isation o f the Istanbul m unicipality in the 1860’ s control o f the h otels had been given to the municipal services but th is supervision seems to have been f a i r l y light-handed. In the 1890's h otels were asked to commu nicate re g u la rly to the p o lice l i s t s o f th e ir patrons.
The H istory o f the Tokatlian i s comparatively the best documented one among the Istanbul h o te ls. We s h a ll g iv e a b r i e f account o f i t as i t i s a nice story o f a succesful business venture sta rtin g with M igirdiç Tokatlian, an Armenian restaurateur owning a restau rant near the Grand Bazaar sp ec ia lize d in Turkish cuisin e with a chosen c lie n t e le from among the senior bureaucrats o f the near-by Sublime Porte, deciding to expand h is business by opening a branch on the fashionable Grand-Rue de Pera. with h is new branch inaugu rated in 1892 under the name o f Splendide, Tokatlian d e lib e r a t ly changed h is sty le from tra d itio n a l Ottoman to the vanguard o f t e chnology. The Splendide with i t s plate-warm ers, i t menus hand w ritten in Erench on paper with golden frames soon became the ’’in " place where fashionable people had to be seen in good company. T Turkish Pashas and Beyy from the Sublime Porte followed Tokatlian to *-his side o f the Golden Horn and introduced new ways and habits to Turkish society. Soon th is was not enough fo r the en treprisin g Tokatlian who opened in 1894 again on the Goand Rue a la rg e hotel second only to the Pera Palace with l i f t s and a l l modern convenien ces He further expended h is empire by taking over in 1894 a c a fé - concertt at Kalender on the Bosphorus. F in a lly in 1905 he opened at Tarabya a summer annex to h is h otel whose Inauguration was the so c ia l event o f the year. A poster fo r the annex was designed by the famous It a lia n painter Zonaro.
Another in terestin g venture was the one run by a French doctor, Dr. Dujardin on the Moda peninsula which according to a f u l l page advert in the Annuaire Cervati fo r the year 1883 appears to be s some so rt o f a health farm with hydrotherapy and dynamotherapy■ o ffe re d as cures fo r a long l i s t o f a f flic t io n s ranging from ne* vous disorders to sexual d iseases. The h otel had grounds over
35.000 square meters and a private dairy. According to the advert service was f i r s t r a t e , "digne des etablissements le plus comfor table de l'E u rop e". A sp ec ia l allowance was made for lo c a l cus toms as a private sitting-room was reserved for la d ie s.
We s h a ll now b r ie f ly discuss the arch itectu ral implications of the establishment o f h otels in Istanbul. The follow ing w i l l only provide a theoratical framework for the discussion and d e t a ils w i l l be discussed over the projection of s lid e s .
XIXth century Ottoman architecture was confronted with the d i f fic u lt y of having to cope with issues hitherto unknown. Answers had to be found to problems stretching fa r beyond the c la s s ic a l requirements o f r e lig io u s ,m ilita r y and c iv i li a n a rc h itetectu re. Demands in new spheres of a c t iv it ie s had to be met. Pre-indus t r i a l Ottoman society had perhaps no other choise than trying to bring an e c le c tic solution to these new issu es. Though i t must be said that some Ottoman architects carried th eir enthu siasm for eclecticism s lig h t ly too f a r . The famous remark o f the French poet Théophile Gautier bears testimony to these excesses! "the Dolmabahçe Palace i s neither Greek nor L itin .n e ith e r Gothic nor Renaissance, neitherArab nor Turkish". The combined e ffo r t s towards eclecticism o f expatriate European arch itects (often not the more prominent members o f the profession ) and o f th eir lo c a l hon-muslem colleagues were not enough to bring about a Greek r e v iv a l in Ottoman architecture as i t had happened in.West European architecture at the same time. Islamic and O riental forms and con cepts had also to be taken into account. (8 )
Hotels constitute a good example o f tne new type of issues Otto man arch itects were asked to solve. There have been cases where they opted fo r an easy way out by allow ing themselves to be f r e e ly in sp ired by sim ilar examples e x istin g in Europe. For instance, the neo-renaissance façade o f the Pera Palace i s strongly rem inis cent o f the B erlin Kaiserhof with i t s k olossal undertones. The Kaiserhof was also managed by the w a g o n s-lits. The arch itect o f the Pera Palace, lo c a lly born and trained Valaury has to h is c re d it more o r ig in a l works such as the Ottoman Public Debt bu ilding or the Ottoman Bank headquarters. The f i r s t bu ildin g i s considered to be a manifesto fo r modern Turkish arch itectu re. Despite the general aspect o f i t s façade of i t s façade, the Pera Palace i s nevertheless sui qeneris because o f i t s s t y li s t i c references in bothi in t e rio r space and decorative adjustments. The Grand H all
(see plan - 24) with i t s Morisco arches and cupolas has a d e f in i te ly O rien tal character. The Salon Turc and the t ile d f i r e place in the Grand Salon ( 22 ) emphasize t h is . On the other hand the Toscan columns in the Dégagement, the brazero in the Bar present a pecu liar contrast with the rococco and a rt deco fu rn itu re . On the whole the physical planning o f the bu ildin g adeguatly meets the requirements o f today's h otel management.
ihe Hotel B r is to l i s a sm aller h otel designed on the same e c le c t ic lin e s , the Hotel d 'A n g le te rre is,from the point o f arch itec ture o f la te Ottoman vintage. It s façade on the Meşrutiyet Cadde si i s a good example o f the receding zigzag in c la s s ic a l Ottoman arch itectu re. One finds complex references to eclecticism in the other important Pera h o te l, the Tokatliyan.
town h o tels, the Pera Palace and the Tokatlian, the Bosphorus hotels had rather simpler plans which allowed them to blend smoothly with the environment. The Summer Palace in Tarabya i s a delic a te structure b u ilt over the grounds of a former country house. As may be seen on the photograph, the architect managed to keep the terraces and the p in e -tre e s. The Bellevue in Biiyukdere i s a former private house converted into a hotel by means of adding a wing. I t i s also of la te Ottoman vintage. The T o k a tlia n 's wooden summer annex in Tarabya which stood in the p la ce o f the present day Tarabya Oteli has a comparatively more complicated aspect but i s in balanced harmony with i t s background The h otels in the P rin ces' islan ds r e f le c t the a rch itectu ral mood proper to these Islan ds. The Splendide with i t s domes, tne Yatch Club with i t s blend of neo-clacissism , the R oyal'at Heybeli with i t s references to Greek lin e ar concepts o ffe r a disparate yet attaching fe e lin g of eerin ess.
As a conclusion one may ponrder on the m u ltifariou s reasons why, the Istanbul hotel industry never did , a fte r a promising s t a rt , r e a lly take o f f . Absence o f a la rg e lo ca l c lie n t e le , the fact that Istanbul was never an actual part of the to u rist c ir c u it ranging from Venice to the Upper N ile , the unwillingness o f the lo c a l c a p ita l holders to invest in a sector which did not y ie ld return compatible with the i n i t i a l investment may account for this It is in te re stin g to note that sim ilar conclusions may be arrived at in a study of the present state o f Turkish h o tels.
Notes
( 1 ) - Our thanks are due to P rof. Sedad Hakkı Eldem, Mr. Taha Toros and Hasan Süzer who have kindly helped us with information and documents.
( 2 ) - E. Isambert, Orient P aris 1873, P 49
( 3 ) - Gerard de Nerval, Voyage en Orient I I P aris 1869, p 185 ( 4 ) - E. Isambert, o p .c it .
(5 ) - ib id p 1045
( 6 ) - F. Lacroix, Guide du Voyageur en Orient P aris 1839 p 1 ( 7 ) - Isambert, opt. c i t . p 1012
P
é r a
P
a l a c e
1
s
r jr
E !
B i i v ü k d e r e Be ' 1 e v u r
Kişisel Arşivlerde İstanbul Belleği Taha Toros Arşivi