Optimize the Supply Chain Problems Solving Features of Imperfect Quality Items
Using EOQ Models Under Different Environment
Sorforaj Nowaj
1*, Nirmal Kumar Duari
2, Tripti Chakrabarti
31State Aided College Teacher Department of Mathematics S.R.Fatepuria College,WB,India
Email:sorforaj1@gmail.com 2Assistant Professor Department of Mathematics Techno India University,WB,India
Email:abnu1985@gmail.com 3Professor
Department of Mathematics Techno India University,WB,India
Email:triptichakrabarti@gmail.com
Article History: Received: 10 January 2021; Revised: 12 February 2021; Accepted: 27 March 2021; Published
online: 16 May 2021
ABSTRACT : This paper is “a supply chain problems comprising of supplier, manufacturer, and retailer have been
thought of. Here supplier gets the crude materials in a ton and afterward the predominant quality items of the crude materials are sold at a more significant expense to the manufacturer after the screening the imperfect crude materials just as second-rate quality items of the crude materials are additionally offered to another manufacturer at a scaled down cost in a solitary cluster before the finish of penny percent screening process. A blend of great and imperfect quality items is created by the manufacturer. After some revise, some repairable bit of imperfect quality items is changed into immaculate quality items and some of non-repairable part of imperfect items are sold with marked down cost to the retailer. Retailer buys both great and imperfect quality items and offers the two items to the clients through his/her separate showrooms of limited limits at a commercial center. Here we utilized a diagnostic strategy and highlights of Supply Chain problems of imperfect items have been utilized to optimize the production rate and crude material request size for maximization of the normal benefit of the integrated model under various environments.” At long last, a numerical example is given to illustrate the model.
Keywords : Supply Chain Management, Problems, Imperfect Items, Different Environment.
1 I
NTRODUCTIONToday “Supply Chain Management (SCM) is one such strategy and issue confronting all business segments. It is a successful procedure and presents an integrated way to deal with settle issues in sourcing client care, demand flow, and distribution. The emphasis is on the client. The outcomes are as diminished operational costs, improved flow of provisions, decrease in deferrals of production, and expanded consumer loyalty. While the objective of supply chain management is to decrease cost of creating and arriving at the completed items to the clients, inventory control is the way to accomplish the objective. Analysts just as specialists in assembling ventures have offered significance to create inventory control problems in supply chain management. All means from supply of crude materials to completed items can be incorporated into a supply chain, interfacing crude materials supplier, manufacturer, retailer, lastly, clients. Late audits on supply chain management are given by Weng (1999), Munson and Rosenblatt (2001), Yang and Wee (2001), Khouja (2003), Yao et al. (2007), Chaharsooghi et al. (2008), Wang et al. (2010), and others. These days, “it isn't unexpected to all businesses that specific levels of delivered or requested items are a blend of great and imperfect quality. It is additionally essential to supply administrator of any association to control and keep up the inventories of great and imperfect quality items. Salameh and Jaber (2000) built up an inventory model for imperfect quality items utilizing the economic production quantity (EPQ)/economic order quantity (EOQ) formulae and accepted that second rate quality items are sold as a solitary clump toward the finish of the absolute screening process. From that point, Goyal and Cardenas-Barron (2002) expanded the possibility of Salameh and Jaber's model and proposed a down to earth way to deal with decide EPQ for items with imperfect quality. Yu et al. (2005)
summed up the models of Salameh and Jaber, (2000) joining weakening and fractional delay purchasing. Liu and Yang (1996) researched a solitary stage production system with imperfect procedure conveying two kinds of deformities: reworkable and reworkable items. The reworkable items are sent for revising, while non-reworkable items are promptly disposed of from the system. They decided the ideal part size that expanded the normal total benefit over the normal time length of the production cycle. Panda and Maiti (2009) spoke to a geometric programming approach for multi-thing inventory models with value subordinate demand under adaptability and unwavering quality with loose space imperative. Mama et al. (2010) considered the impacts of imperfect production forms and the choice on whether and when to execute a screening procedure for imperfect items generated during a production run. Sana (2010) creates two inventory models in an imperfect production system and indicated that the sub-par quality items could be adjusted at a cost where by and large production inventory expenses could be decreased altogether. Sana (2011) broadened the possibility of imperfect production process in three-layer supply chain management system.”
This article centers around an imperfect production supply chain model thinking about item unwavering quality and “revamping of imperfect items in three-layer supply chain under fluffy unpleasant environment. In the model, the supplier gets the crude materials; all are not of flawless quality, in a ton and conveys the items of better quality than the manufacturer and the second-rate quality items are sold at a marked down cost in a solitary group before the finish of the penny percent screening process. The manufacturer delivers a blend of great and imperfect quality items. A segment of the imperfect items is changed into ideal quality items after revise. Another bit of imperfect items, named as 'less flawless quality items,' is sold at a scaled down cost to the retailer, and the part which can't be either changed to the ideal quality items or sold at a marked down cost is being dismissed. Here, retailer buys both the ideal and imperfect quality items from the manufacturer to offer the items to the clients through his/her particular showrooms of limited limits. An optional stockroom of boundless limit is employed by the retailer on rental premise to store the abundance amount of flawless quality items. This model considers the effect of business strategies, for example, ideal request size of crude materials, production rate, and unit production cost in various segments in a
teaming up promoting system that can be utilized in the business, similar to textile, footwear, and electronics goods.
2
OBJECTIVES
I. To explore the implications of the inspection process and features of Supply Chain problems of imperfect items under different Environment;
II. To analyze the step-by-step procedure of Supply Chain problems of imperfect items using EOQ models after under observation of previous literature under various inspection process;
3 VISIONS
The vision of “supply chain management is best depicted as getting the correct ware in the correct amounts to the opportune spot at the perfect time, the first run through. This requires coordination components that integrate supply chain substances, for example, suppliers, manufacturers, wholesalers/merchants and retailers, so as to fulfill service level necessities, while limiting system-wide expenses (Chopra and Meindl, 2007; Simchi-Levi et al., 1999).”
4 MISSION
The present serious markets, supply chains can't tolerate process disappointments and, along these lines, “the components of hazard among between related business elements must be perceived. One of the components identified with that hazard is the measure of inventories that organizations must hold so as to be receptive to advertise needs. Requesting over the top inventory lessens requesting cost and may diminish buy cost, yet it might likewise tie up capital, which may prompt pointless holding cost and items that may deteriorate. Then again, requesting too little inventory diminishes the holding cost, yet can bring about lost deals and, thus influence the unwavering quality of the activity of an inventory system. Thusly, one essential issue habitually experienced in this field is the assurance of when items are requested and what number of items will be requested per request cycle. This establishes the center of inventory control problems.”
There is no single existing hypothesis that can enough catch all parts of the pertinent procedures and the inventory problems related with them. Consequently, making a commitment that researchers would esteem ‘critical’ isn't a
simple assignment. This investigation has “crucial development the present condition of information in the field of inventory numerical modeling and management by methods for giving hypothetically substantial and experimentally suitable summed up inventory structures to help inventory managers towards the assurance of ideal request/production amounts that limit the total system cost. We demonstrate that the answer for each hidden inventory model, in the event that it exists, is one of a kind and worldwide ideal. Down to earth examples that are distributed in the literature for summed up models around there are demonstrated to be extraordinary instances of our proposed models.”
5 RESEARCH
METHODOLOGIES
Research paradigm is connected “to explicit basic presumptions about the truth, information, qualities and rationale of the subject being examined. Therefore, they may regularly be seen as vague, understood, or be underestimated, frequently bringing about the expression’s ‘paradigm’, ‘methodology’ and ‘strategy’ being utilized conversely in the literature (McGregor and Murnane, 2010). Perceiving every paradigm by its philosophical underpinnings in ‘approach’s’ comprises a method by which researchers see the world or reality under scrutiny. Methodology includes notifying the strategies and techniques grasped to shape research in this paradigm (McGregor, 2007; 2008).”
These inclination “of every paradigm depends generally on its capacity to respond to the two crucial inquiries establishing the ontological (the nature of the real world) and epistemological (the nature of information) presumptions. In the space of epistemology, researchers investigate the idea of how the world is seen. In the area of cosmology, researchers explore the structure and nature of the real world (Guba and Lincoln, 1994, p. 108). The idea of the issue under scrutiny and the aim to think of generalizable arrangements suggests following the positivist paradigm for the motivations behind this work. “Firmly connected “with the positivist paradigm is deductive mathematical modeling and its related techniques, which establish the most widely recognized strategies embraced in supply chain research (Aastrup and Halldórsson, 2008). Mathematical improvement is utilized generally in this environment as a successful guide to take care of problems including dynamic. In this proposal, and once a suitable mathematical formulation is expected and worked for the total cost (objective) work, non-straight advancement techniques are embraced to infer the arrangement methodology expected to acquire the ideal request/manufactured amount that limits the absolute system cost.”
6 LITETRATURE
RIVIEW
Literature identified with “supply chain management control for imperfect quality items is multidisciplinary in nature and, for introduction purposes in this article, is specifically sorted out around four standards of research: 1) supply chain management quality related issues; 2) data sharing and examination forms; 3) model formulations and related arrangement techniques that think about imperfect quality items; and 4) parcel size inventory models with two degrees of capacity. The scholastic literature identified with the principal, third and fourth topics are looked into. For the subsequent topic, some conversation on the Value of Information (VOI) and learning impact is directed to empower linkage with the examination procedure. This gives the important foundation to situate our examination in the present assemblage of literature.”
6.1 Supply Chain Management Quality Issues
Some “verifiable supposition inserted in the EOQ model is that put away items safeguard their physical qualities uncertainly. This supposition may remain constant for specific wares. In any case, in actuality, settings, items are dependent upon "perishability", "weakening" and "outdated nature" that influence the physical state/wellness and conduct of a thing while away or as it travels through the supply chain (Goyal and Giri, 2001b; Bakker et al., 2012; Pahl and Voß, 2014). Next, we present an outline of past investigations identified with the quality issues considered in this article.”
• “Perishability and lifetime constraints”
Nahmia “(1975, 1977) presented the fixed lifetime case and broke down the issue of an arbitrary lifetime item oversaw under occasional audit with fixed stochastic demand. He accepted no fixed request cost and accumulated demand and requests dying in a similar succession that they enter stock (for example a FIFO dispatching approach). Padmanabhan and Vrat (1995) explored an inventory model for transitory items with stock ward selling rate. Abad
(1996) introduced estimating and parcel measuring models under states of perishability and fractional putting in a raincheck. Giri and Chaudhuri (1998) contemplated deterministic inventory models of transitory item with stock ward demand rate. Ketzenberg et al. (2012) expanded crafted by Nahmias (1977) and tended to the irregular lifetime as an element of the item's time and temperature history (TTH) in the supply chain. They took into account requests to die out of succession, to dispose of inventory that remaining parts useful available to be purchased and to sell inventory that may have just died. Amorim et al. (2013) introduced an order of models for short-lived items that have express attributes identified with their physical status (for example by waste, rot or consumption) and additionally changes in their incentive as saw by the client and additionally a danger of future decreased usefulness as per pro conclusion. Pahl and Voß (2014) gave a far-reaching literature survey that tends to crumbling and lifetime limitations of items. Ketzenberg et al. (2015) thought about a case in which, unsatisfied demand having been lost, items may show up as of now died and requests may not die in arrangement.”
• Deterioration
Some researcher “Ghare and Schrader (1963) were among the primary creators to address inventory problems considering breaking down items. Secretive and Philip (1973) defined an EOQ model in which the decay rate follows a two parameter Weibull distribution. Shah and Jaiswal (1977) and Aggarwal (1978) created inventory models with a consistent rate of disintegration. Nourishment and Chaudhuri (2006) built up an EOQ model with incline type demand and time subordinate decay rate. In that model, the unit production cost is contrarily relative to the demand rate. Ahmed et al. (2013) planned inventory models with ramp type demand rate, fractional multiplying and general crumbling rate. Sarkar and Sarkar (2013) gave an inventory model stock-subordinate demand, fractional multiplying and time-fluctuating crumbling rate. Sicilia et al. (2014) built up a deterministic inventory model for falling apart items with deficiencies and time-shifting demand
6.2 Information Sharing and Inspection Process
This is “a consistent understanding among researchers and professionals on the advantages of data sharing that permits all the more opportune material flow in a supply chain (Costantino et al., 2013). Much of the time, items involve review to guarantee a proper service to the clients (White and Cheong, 2012). In this area, we first location the significance of VOI in supply chains, trailed by some conversation that connects the VOI and learning impact with the examination procedure related with the formulation of EOQ inventory models.”
• Value of Information (VOI)
Estimation “of data (VOI) in supply chains have gotten progressively significant and may identify with sharing information far beyond demand and inventory data (Dong et al., 2014). For example, current advances, for example, radio-recurrence recognizable proof (RFID) systems, information lumberjacks and time–temperature integrators and sensors, are fit for recording, following and transmitting data seeing a thing as it travels through the supply chain (Jedermann et al., 2008). The arrangement of such advancements builds supply chain perceivability, which thus brings down security stocks and improves client assistance level (Gaukler et al., 2007; Kim and Glock 2014). Ketzenberg et al. (2007) directed a broad literature survey of papers that: (1) address VOI with regards to inventory control, (2) give a numerical report to investigate VOI over a lot of shifting working qualities and (3) analyze at least two situations. What's more, they created and tried a VOI system to help distinguish the determinants of VOI. The researchers called attention to that the prevailing research stream here spotlights on the estimation of demand data to improve supply chain execution.”
• Learning Effects
The “Learning Phenomenon presented by Wright (1936) infers that the exhibition of a system occupied with a monotonous errand improves with time. The learning marvel is reflected by the "learning bend" hypothesis, which connects the exhibition of a particular errand with the occasions that the undertaking is rehashed. Wright's capacity work formulation (which depended on observational information) recommends that as production amasses, the unit production time diminishes by a consistent rate (for example 80 percent, 70 percent, and so on.) each time the amount pairs.
Inspection may likewise be assumed basic for refreshing “the Information System records with great items that are really accessible in stock, in order to maintain a strategic distance from deficiencies. Also, inspection may take out the arrival service cost related with item reviews (Klassen and Vereecke 2012). It very well may be utilized, in actuality, settings where the effect of permitting through imperfect items could be extreme. Various kinds of inspection can happen, including seal inspection, external case name inspection or harmed container inspection. The service cost may incorporate altruism cost, transportation cost, and re-processing cost, and that may influence all supply chain individuals. Inspection may likewise diminish holding costs because of the organization of less saving environmental conditions, for example the imperfect items are not ordinarily put away in a similar stockroom where the great items are put away (for example Wahab and Jaber, 2010).”
6.3 Inventory Models with Imperfect Quality Items
This old style “EOQ has been a generally acknowledged model for inventory control purposes because of its basic and instinctively engaging mathematical formulation. In any case, it is consistent with state that the activity of the model depends on various expressly or certainly made, ridiculous, mathematical suspicions that are never really met practically speaking (Jaber et al., 2004; Liao et al., 2013). For example, the presumption of immaculate quality items is innovatively unreachable in most supply chain applications and it is a significant limitation in the old-style formulation of the EOQ model (Cheng, 1991).”
• “Single-warehouse model”
Some Author “Porteus (1986) examined the effect of imperfect items when the production process may move arbitrarily from an in-control state to a crazy state during a production run. He accepted that every imperfect thing could be modified. Essentially, Rosenblatt and Lee (1986) considered the impacts of an imperfect assembling process on the assurance of an ideal assembling process duration. Salameh and Jaber (2000) built up a mathematical model that allows a portion of the items to dip under the quality necessities, for example an irregular extent of imperfect items is expected for each part size shipment, with a known likelihood distribution. The researchers accepted that each part is dependent upon a 100 percent screening, where imperfect items are kept in a similar distribution center until the finish of the screening process and afterward can be sold at a value lower than that of immaculate quality items. Cárdenas-Barrón (2000) amended a minor blunder showing up on Salameh and Jaber's model yet didn't lessen the primary thought and the commitment. Goyal and Cárdenas-Barrón (2002) built up a functional methodology for deciding the financial production amount. Chan et al. (2003) introduced a comparable model, where items are arranged as acceptable quality, great quality subsequent to revising, imperfect quality, and scrap.“Researcher “Jaggi and Mittal (2011) explored the impact of decay on a retailer's EOQ when the items are of imperfect quality. In that paper, imperfect items were thought to be kept in a similar distribution center until the finish of the screening process. Jaggi et al. (2011) and Sana (2012) introduced inventory models, which represent imperfect quality items under the state of passable deferral in installments. Moussawi-Haidar et al. (2014) expanded crafted by Jaggi and Mittal (2011) to consider deficiencies.”
• “Single-Warehouse Model with Learning”
Researchers “Salameh and Jaber (2000) explored about the level of imperfect items per part lessens as indicated by a learning bend. They inspected observational information from the car business for a few learning bends models and the Sshaped calculated learning bend (Jordan, 1958; Carlson, 1973) was found to fit well. Wahab and Jaber (2010) introduced the situation where diverse holding costs for good and imperfect items are expected. They demonstrated that on the off chance that the system is liable to learning, at that point the parcel size with the equivalent accepted holding costs for the great and imperfect items is not exactly the one with contrasting holding costs. When there is no learning in the system, the part size with varying holding costs increments with the level of imperfect items. Konstantaras et al. (2012) called attention to that as learning in quality expands, at that point the parcel size, number of imperfect items and deficiencies decline. Hlioui et al. (2015) examined recharging, production and quality control strategies in a three-phase supply chain with imperfect quality items. They called attention to that the mix of 100 percent screening process or disposing of choices is progressively helpful, and guarantees better coordination at a lower cost.”
Researcher “Zhang and Gerchak (1990) built up a joint parcel estimating and inspection strategy under an EOQ model, in which an arbitrary extent of the part was viewed as imperfect. Small (1995a) introduced a joint estimating and renewal arrangement for disintegrating items with a declining market. In a development, Wee (1995b) built up a deterministic inventory model for weakening items with deficiencies and a declining market. Yang and Wee (2002) explored the impact of crumbling and consistent production and demand rates on a production inventory arrangement with a solitary merchant and different purchasers. Rau et al. (2003) proposed an integrated inventory model for decaying items and inferred an ideal joint total expense for a multi-echelon supply chain environment.” Researcher “Huang (2004) built up a model to decide an ideal integrated seller purchaser inventory arrangement for imperfect items in a without a moment to spare assembling environment. Huang and Yao (2005) examined an ideally planning inventory model for disintegrating items in a supply chain system with a solitary seller and different purchasers. Lo et al. (2007) determined an integrated merchant purchaser supply chain model with imperfect production processes. They expected a shifting rate of weakening, halfway delay purchasing and expansion. Sung and Gong (2008) proposed a production inventory model for decaying production with imperfect items being revamped and joint material renewal approach being thought. Singh and Diksha (2009) planned an integrated seller purchaser agreeable inventory model for falling apart items, taking into account multivariate demand and dynamic credit period. Wahab et al. (2011) built up an EOQ inventory model for a planned two-level supply chain by taking into consideration deficiencies and environmental impacts. Moussawi-Heidar and Jaber (2013) proposed a joint model for money and inventory management for a retailer under postponement in installments. Khan et al. (2014) introduced an integrated merchant purchaser inventory strategy by representing learning in production at the sellers' end and quality inspection mistakes at the purchasers' end.” And some researcher “Paul et al. (2014) introduced a joint renewal strategy with imperfect quality items for various items. Rad et al. (2014) inferred an integrated merchant purchaser for a demand-driven estimating model with imperfect production and deficiencies. Ongkunaruk et al. (2016) decided the ideal reordering arrangement for different items in a joint renewal issue. They integrated shipment limitation, spending requirement and transportation limit imperative. Yu and Hsu (2017) determined a solitary seller, single-retailer, production-inventory model when a 100 percent inspection is expected with imperfect items being come back to vendor quickly under an inconsistent measured shipment.”
6.4 Two Warehouse Model
The “EOQ model is an old style, regularly founded on the suspicion that the OW has boundless limit. Notwithstanding, there are numerous elements that may prompt buying various units that may surpass the constrained limit of OW, bringing about the over-the-top units being put away in another RW, which is thought to be of plentiful limit. Such factors may incorporate a limited cost of goods offered by the supplier, income (procurement cost) being higher than the holding cost in RW, and avoiding high expansion rates. The most punctual way to deal with address the fundamental two-distribution center inventory model was perceived by Hartley (1976). Sarma (1983) introduced a deterministic two-distribution center inventory model under an ideal discharge rule, in which the expense of shipping a thing from RW to OW is expected. Murdeshwar and Sathe (1985) talked about certain parts of parcel size model with two degrees of capacity and inferred the answer for ideal parcel size under limited production rates.”
Various researchers “Yang (2004) proposed a two-distribution center inventory issue for disintegrating items under swelling. In that model, the inventory deteriorates at a consistent rate and deficiencies were permitted. Small et al. (2005) explored a two-stockroom inventory model with Weibull distribution weakening under expansion. They expected incomplete putting in a raincheck and applied the limited income in issue examination. Zhou and Yang (2005) introduced a two-distribution center model taking into account stock-level ward demand rate. Yang (2006) expanded his previous model, Yang (2004), representing incomplete multiplying and swelling. Color et al. (2007) proposed a deterministic two-stockroom inventory model for breaking down items. They took into account deficiencies to happen in the OW with the multiplying demand rate being subject to the length of the stock out. Ghosh and Chakrabarty (2009) examined a request level inventory model under two degrees of capacity for crumbling items and time-subordinate demand. Jaggi et al. (2010) proposed a two-stockroom inventory model for disintegrating items when demand is value delicate. Dem and Singh (2012) researched a two-distribution center production model for disintegrating items under quality thought. Sett et al. (2012) built up a two=warehouse production model expecting quadratically expanding demand and time-changing weakening. Agrawal et al. (2013) introduced a two-distribution center inventory model with consistent crumbling rates, incline type demand and fractional accumulating.“The expressions "disintegration", "perishability" and "oldness" are utilized conversely in
the literature and may frequently be seen as equivocal on the grounds that “they are connected to explicit basic presumptions with respect to the physical state/wellness and conduct of items after some time. In this theory, we give more clear definitions that recognize the job of each term. For example, disintegration shows the process of rot, harm or waste of an item, for example the item loses its worth attributes and can never again be sold/utilized for its unique reason. Conversely, a thing with a fixed lifetime (lapse date) perishes once surpassing its most extreme rack lifetime and subsequently it must be disposed of. Out of date quality alludes to items acquiring an incomplete or a total loss of significant worth so that the incentive for an item constantly diminishes with its apparent utility/allure. So as to upgrade this line of research, we figure a key exhibition marker (KPI), for example an upper-bound (cost related with OW (RW) being inert) that renders AIFO the ideal dispatching approach. Numerous reasonable examples distributed in the literature for summed up models here comprise unique instances of our proposed models, make, we feel, a significant commitment to the supply chain literature.”
7 SUPPLY
CHAIN
PROBLEMS
OF
IMPERFECT
QUALITY
ITEMS
USING
EOQ
MODELS
AN
ANALYSIS
We are presented “a general EOQ model for items with imperfect quality under fluctuating demand, imperfect items, a screening process and disintegration rates for an endless arranging skyline. Subsequently, the sweeping statement of the model stretches out past scholarly interests to empower inventory managers to build up ideal request amounts that limit the absolute system cost. In the model, each part is dependent upon a 100 percent screening where items that don't adjust to certain quality gauges are put away in an alternate distribution center. Along these lines, diverse holding costs for the great and imperfect items are considered in the mathematical model. Items deteriorate while they are away, with demand, screening and crumbling rates being subjective elements of time. In this manner, the chief can evaluate the outcomes of a differing scope of strategies by utilizing a solitary inventory model. The level of imperfect items per parcel lessens as per a learning bend. After a 100 percent screening, imperfect quality items might be sold at a limited cost as a solitary bunch toward the finish of the screening process or bring about a removal punishment charge. A thorough technique is used to show that the arrangement, in the event that it exists, is one of a kind and worldwide ideal. Recently distributed models around there are demonstrated to be extraordinary instances of our model. The conduct of various conditions, (for example, utilizing capacities for differing demand, screening, and imperfectness and decay rates) is examined utilizing illustrative examples, and intriguing bits of knowledge are offered to professionals.”
Notation
The following notation and assumptions are used in the entire study. For simplicity, the symbols for parameters, decision variable and functions are defined accordingly, parameters are:
• “𝑗 Cycle index
• 𝐷(𝑡) Demand rate per unit time • 𝑥(𝑡) Screening rate per unit time • 𝛿(𝑡) Deterioration rate per unit time • 𝑝𝑗 Percentage of defective items per lot • 𝑐 Unit purchasing cost
• 𝑑 Unit screening cost
• ℎ𝑔 Holding cost of good items per unit per unit time • ℎ𝑑 Holding cost of defective items per unit per unit time • 𝑘 Ordering cost per cycle
• 𝑄𝑗 Lot size delivered for cycle 𝑗 • 𝑇1𝑗 = 𝑓1𝑗(𝑄𝑗) Time to screen 𝑄𝑗 units
• 𝑇2𝑗 = 𝑓2𝑗(𝑄𝑗) Cycle length
• 𝐼𝑔𝑗(𝑡) Inventory level of good items at time 𝑡
• 𝐼𝑑𝑗(𝑡) Inventory level of defective items at time 𝑡
• 𝑤 Total cost per cycle
• 𝑤𝑄𝑗 Derivative of 𝑤 with respect to 𝑄𝑗
• 𝑓2𝑗,𝑄𝑗 Derivative of 𝑓2𝑗 with respect to 𝑄𝑗
• 𝜔𝑗 Number of deteriorated items for cycle 𝑗”
The rest of the part is sorted out as follows: “
Our general EOQ model for items with imperfect quality, the presumptions and documentation of the inventory system are introduced in Section 1. The arrangement systems are introduced in Section 2, followed, in Section 4, by illustrative examples that demonstrate the use of the hypothetical outcomes by and by. Administrative bits of knowledge and closing comments are given in Section 3.
1. “Formulation of the general EOQ model”
Suppositions and documentation: “The mathematical model is created under the accompanying suspicions and documentation:”
• A solitary thing is held in stock”
• “The lead-time is irrelevant, and no limit limitations are expected, for example any renewal requested toward the start of a cycle shows up only preceding the finish of that equivalent cycle.”
• “The demand, screening and decay rates are discretionary elements of time signified by D(t), x(t) and δ(t) individually.”
• “The level of imperfect items per parcel decreases as indicated by a learning bend signified by 𝑝𝑗, where j is the cycle list.”
• Deficiencies are not permitted, i.e., we require that
• The accompanying documentations are utilized for the cost parameters: c is the unit buying cost. d is the unit screening cost. ℎg indicates the holding cost of good items per unit per unit time. ℎd signifies the holding cost of imperfect items per unit per unit time. k is the requesting cost per cycle.”
The model”
Toward “the start of each cycle j (j= 1, 2, …), a great deal of size Qj is conveyed, which covers the genuine demand and crumbling during both the main stage (screening) and the subsequent stage (non-screening). Each parcel is exposed to a 100 percent screening process at a rate of x(t) that begins toward the start of the cycle and stops by time T1j, so, all-in time Qj units have been screened and yj units have been drained, which is the summation of demand and crumbling. During this stage, items not fitting in with certain quality measures are put away in an alternate distribution center. The variety in the inventory level during the first and second stages (Fig. 1) and the variety in the inventory level for the imperfect items (shaded zone) are given by (1), (3) and (4) individually.”
, , 1 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ), 0 g j j g j j DI t D t p x t t I t t T
dt = − − − ………. (1) with the boundary condition Igj(0) = Qj
www where 1 0 ( ) j T j Q =
x u ……… (2), , 1 2 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ), g j j g j j j DI t D t p x t t I t T t T
dt = − − − …………... (3) with the boundary condition Ig j(T2j)=0
2 ( ) ( ), 0 d j j j DI t p x t t T
dt = ……….. (4) with the boundary condition Idj(0)=0
”
Fig. 1: “Supply Chain variety of an Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) Model for One Cycle” The solutions of the above differential equations are:
1 ( ( ) (0)) ( ) ( ) , 0 0 ( ) g t g Tj ( ) g t t ( ) ( ) g u d j j I t =e− −
x u du−e−
D u +p x u e ,0 t T1j... (5) 2 ( ) ( ) ,( ) 0 ( ) , 1 2 j T g t g u g j j j I t =e−
D u e du T t T ……… (6) ,( ) 0 ( ) , 0 1 t d j j j I t =
p x u du t T …………. (7) respectively, where ( ) ( ) g t
t dt ……… (8)The per cycle cost parts for the given supply chain system are as per the following: The Purchasing and supply cost 1
0 ( )
j T
x u du
=
Note that this cost includes the imperfect and deteriorated items.Holding cost=hgIg j,(0,T1j)+Ig j,(T1,j,T2,j+h hd d j,(0,T1,j)
Hence, the total expense per unit time of the basic inventory system during the cycle [0, T2j] as a function of T1j and
T2j; say z(T1j, T2j) is given by;
1 (0) 1 1, 2, 0 0 2, 1 ( , ) ( ) Tj ( ) [ (0) g Tj ( ) j j g j z T T c d x u du h G e x u du T = +
+ −
+ 1 1 2 1 ( ) ( ) ( ) 0 ( ) ( ) 0 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ] j j j j T T T g u g u g u j T D u G u e du+ p x u G u e du+ D u G u e du +
1 1 0 [ ] ( ) j T d j j h T −u p x u du+k
………. (9) Where ( ) ( ) g t G t =
e− dt ………. (10)with one another as follows: 1 2 0TjTj ………. (11) 1 2 1 (0) ( ) ( ) 0 ( ) 0 ( ) 0 ( ) j j j T T T g g u g u j e
x u du=
D u e du+
p x u e du ……… (12)Accordingly, we will likely take care of the accompanying improvement issue, which we will call issue (m) (m)= {minimize Z(T1j, T2j) given by (9) subjected to (11) and hj=0}
Where 1 1 2 (0) ( ) ( ) 0 ( ) 0 ( ) 0 ( ) j j j T T T g g u g u j j h =e
x u du−
p x u e du−
D u e duIt can be noted from Eq. (12), thatT1j= 0 T2j=0andT1j 0 T1jT2j. Consequently Eq. (12) infers imperative (11).
Thusly, on the off chance that we incidentally overlook the dullness requirement (11) and call the subsequent issue (m1) at that point (11) satisfies any arrangement of (m1). Thus (m)and (m1) are equal. In addition, T1j> 0 ⟹
right-hand side (RHS) of (6) > 0, for example Eq. (12) ensures that the quantity of good items is in any event equivalent to the demand during the main stage.
2. Solution Procedures
To begin with, note from (2) that T1j can be resolved as an element of Qj, state
1j 1j( j)
T =f Q ………. (13)
Considering Eq. (12) we find that T1j can be resolved as an element of T2j, and in this manner of Qj, state
2j 2j( j)
T =f Q ………. (14)
Along these lines, in the event that we substitute (12)- (14) in (9) at that “point issue (m) will be changed over to the accompanying unconstrained issue with the variable Qj (which we will call issue (m2)).”
1 (0) 1 0 0 2, 1 ( ) ( ) fj ( ) [ (0) g fj ( ) g j W Qj c d x u du h G e x u du f = +
+ −
+ 1 2 1 ( ) ( ) 0 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ] j j j f g u f g u j T p x u G u e du+ D u G u e du +
1 1 0 [ ] ( ) j f d j j h
f −u p x u du+k ………. (15) Presently, “the vital condition for having a base for issue (m2) is”0
j
dw
dQ = ……… (16) We“find out the solution of (16), let
2 j w W f = then” 2 2 2 2 ' j j 'j j j j w Q f f Q w dw dQ f − = ……… (17)
wherew Q' jand f'2jQjare “the derivatives of w and regarding (w.r.t) Qj, separately. Subsequently, (16) is equal to”
Additionally, “taking the principal derivative of the two sides of (12) (w.r.t) Qj we acquire” ( 1 ) (2 ) (0) 2 2 ' ( ) g fj g f j j g j jQ j e −p e =f D f e ……… (19) By“which and (13)-(15) we have,”
1 ( ) (0) 2 1 2 ' ( ) ( ( ) (0)) g ( ( ) ( )) g fj Qj g j j j j w = +c d +h G f −G e +G f −G f p e + 1 0 1 ( ) ( ) j f d j j h p x u du x f
……… (20) Also (18) ' 2 2 ' j Q j jQj w w W f f = = ……… (21) Where W is given by (15) and 'j Q
w is given by (20). Eq. (21) can be utilized to decide “the ideal estimations of T1j and T2j can be found from (13) and (14), individually.
3. “Illustrative examples for various settings”
We have to present in this segment, “examples to illustrate the hypothetical utilization of our mathematical model and arrangement technique, whereby we think about situations with differing demand, screening, imperfectness and crumbling rates. The mathematical formulation introduced in this research article thinks about self-assertive elements of time, for example the mathematical formulation has no limitation on all capacities modeled. This suggests numerous capacities can be incorporated to permit the leader to survey and think about the results of an assorted scope of strategies by utilizing a solitary inventory model. It is important that the prevailing type of a learning bend executed by researchers and professionals the same is either a S-formed (Jordan, 1958; Carlson, 1973), or a force one as recommended by Wright (1936); kindly allude to Jaber (2006) for conversation on this issue. “
We have to present Example 1, we think about the accompanying capacities for differing demand, screening, imperfectness, and weakening rates:”
( ) , ( ) x t =at+b D t =at+r, , ( ) j j l p t e z t = = + − where,b r, , , z0; , , , ,a a l 0and tz
The parameter “α “speaks to the rate of progress in the demand. The instance of α = 0 mirrors a steady demand rate, when then D(t)=r ∀t≥ 0. A comparable conduct is watched for the impact of α = 0 reflects a constant demand rate, when then D(t)=r ∀t≥ 0. A similar behavior is observed for the effect of “α”, the rate of progress in the screening rate. “Note that δ(t) is an expanding capacity of time. The instance of β = 0 mirrors a steady weakening rate and l = 0 compares to the case related with no decay. The level of imperfect items per parcel lessens as per S-formed calculated learning bend (Jordan, 1958; Carlson, 1973), where τ and π are model parameters, γ is the learning exponent and j is the cycle index. The case γ = 0 applies to a steady level of imperfect items per parcel. The issue (m2) has been coded in MATLAB for the above demand, screening, imperfectness and weakening rates and arrangements were gotten utilizing Eq. (21) for a wide scope of the control parameter esteems. Here, we receive the qualities considered in the examination by Wahab and Jaber (2010), that are introduced in Table 1 underneath. Table 1: Input Parameters of Example 1
The “optimal values of * * * * 1 2
, , , ,
j j j j
Q T T and the relating total least expense for 10 progressive cycles are gotten and the outcomes are appeared in Table 2. In the primary cycle, we have taken p1 = 0.08524 bringing about a total number of *
1
Q = 3550 units, which is screened by time * 11
T = 0.0354 ≅ 13 days and consumed by time * 21
T = 0.0648 ≅ 24 days. The total minimum cost per year is *
1
= 5585464 dollars and the total minimum cost per cycle is * 1
= 362030 dollars. The number of imperfect items is *
1 1
p Q = 303 units and the number of deteriorated items is * 1
= 5.4 units, which is the contrast between the genuine demand and the sum held in stock toward the start of the cycle, barring the number of imperfect items. The amount *
1 1
p Q might be sold at a rescue cost at time or cause a removal punishment charge. In the following area, we dissect the conduct of the hypothetical models in various settings. Table 3 portrays the impact of each model parameter on the ideal qualities. Fig. 2 shows the effect of deformities and fluctuating demand and deterioration rates on the ideal request amount. Fig. 3 contrasts the parcel size and the equivalent accepted holding costs for the great and imperfect items with that of varying holding costs. Fig. 4 demonstrates the impact of various learning bends on the ideal request amounts.”
Table 2“optimal outcomes for fluctuating demand, screening
and deterioration rates with 0.7932 * 70.07 819.76 j j p e = + ”
Table 2: Optimal Outcomes for Fluctuating Demand, Screening and Deterioration Rates
4.Sensitivity Analysis
The outcomes “introduced in Table 3 sum up the sensitivity analysis of the optimal order quantity, total least expense per unit time and total least expense per cycle as for every single model parameter. The primary line speaks to the first estimations of the proposed model and the last one yields the estimations of the EOQ model. Fig. 2 portrays the impact of each extra model parameter on the EOQ, for example the initial three qualities speak to the part sizes of the last three lines (EOQ, EOQ with deformity and EOQ with the dis-area of good and imperfect items, separately). While here we show the accompanying qualities mirror the impact of each extra model parameter on the EOQ (Fig.2). Fig. 3 duplicates the initial two columns of Table 3 for 10 continuous cycles to look at the instance of having similar holding costs for the great and imperfect items with that of varying holding costs. Table 1 is duplicated for 20 back-to-back cycles to look at
j j p e =
+ (Jordan, 1958; Carlson, 1973) with pj 1j
−
=
+
(Wright, 1936) and the result is shown in Fig. 4 for τ= 40, π = 999, γ = 0.75”
Table 3: “Sensitivity Analysis for the General Model”
Fig. 2: “The Impact of Each Extra Model Parameter on the Economic Order Quantity (EOQ)
when 0.7932 * 70.07 819.76 j j p e = +
Fig. 4: “A comparison of the Optimal Lot Sizes for
0.75 0.75 40 40 and 999 999 1 j j j p p j e = = + + ”
Table 2 shows that “the total least expense every year and the total least expense per cycle decline as learning builds, which bolsters the discoveries introduced by Jaber et al. (2008) and Wahab and Jaber (2010). The organized outcomes demonstrate that every optimal quantity decline as learning increments, aside from the measure of deteriorated items that bring about a minor increment that can be defended by the slight increment in the cycle length (Table 2). The nearness of deformities and differing demand and deterioration rates fundamentally sway on the optimal order quantity (Table 2 and Fig. 2). The parcel size with the equivalent accepted holding costs for the great and imperfect items is not exactly the one with varying holding costs. Be that as it may, the contrast between the two quantities disappears as pj takes on moderately little qualities (Fig. 4.3). Such finding is consistence with that introduced by Jaber et al. (2008). The outcomes in Table 2 show a slight lessening in the total least expense every year because of a slight diminishing in pj. This is valid in the early stage when a S-formed strategic learning bend is accepted, which is steady with the conduct of moderate improvement saw in this short stage, making the S-molded learning bend a suitable model to utilize (Dar-El, 2000). Then again, this isn't the situation when Wright's learning bend is thought of, which at that point prompts littler quantities in the beginning stage and subsequently the total least expense every year carries on comparatively (Fig. 4). Fig. 4 demonstrates that the decrease in the total least expense every year and the optimal order quantities follow a similar style as that of 𝑝𝑗.”
The impact of “α, the rate of progress in the demand essentially impacts the optimal order quantity and the total least expense every year (Table 3). Besides, this impact remains constant for the case in which the deterioration rate is thought to be of a fixed an incentive just as for the case related with no deterioration (Table 3). The nearness of deterioration significantly affects the optimal order quantity and the total least expense every year (Table 3). Such finding is consistence with that introduced by Moussawi-Haidar et al. (2014). An examination between the outcomes got in Tables 2 and 3 uncovers that the decrease of the optimal order quantity doesn't infer that the total least expense every year diminishes; truth be told, it might increment. Recently distributed models around there are demonstrated to be unique instances of our model (Table 3).”
8 NEEDS
FOR THE RESEARCHThis old style “EOQ has been a generally acknowledged model for inventory control purposes because of its basic and instinctively engaging mathematical formulation. In any case, the model depends on a number of expressly or certainly made, unreasonable, mathematical presumptions that are never really met practically speaking (Jaber et al., 2004; Liao et al., 2013). Salameh and Jaber (2000) introduced a mathematical model wherein an arbitrary extent of imperfect items is expected for each part size shipment. Maddah and Jaber (2008) built up another model that amends a blemish in the model introduced by Salameh and Jaber (2000) utilizing restoration hypothesis. Jaber et al. (2008) expanded this by accepting the level of imperfect items per parcel lessens as indicated by a learning bend. They inspected experimental information from the car business for a few learning bends models and the S-formed
strategic learning bend (Jordan, 1958; Carlson, 1973) was found to fit well. Jaggi and Mittal (2011) explored the impact of deterioration on a retailer's EOQ when the items are of imperfect quality.”
9 CONCLUSIONS
Business associations everywhere throughout “the world is endeavoring hard to advance strategies to make due in the time of rivalry introduced by globalization. Supply chain management (SCM) is one such strategy. This paper creates diagnostic highlights of Supply Chain problems of imperfect items under various environments. Inspection cost is brought about during the production run time, and the manufacturer persistently assesses just as separates the ideal quality items, less impeccable quality items, repairable items which are changed into ideal quality items after some revise, and reject items. Revised expense is considered by the manufacturer to fix a specific level of imperfect quality items. The demand rate of the clients for flawless quality items and less immaculate quality items are separately accepted as stock ward and selling value subordinate.”
The impact of the nearness of imperfect items on parcel size has gotten the consideration of numerous researchers in the field. In any case, “there has been little research that connects the inspection process with the management of transitory inventories. In equal, it is fascinating to investigate the ramifications of the inspection process into inventory dynamic. Additionally, a survey of the literature uncovers that there is no distributed work that determines arrangement systems for intermittent audit applications for the EOQ model with imperfect quality items. In this manner, it would be esteem adding to the literature of supply chain management if a point-by-point technique is given which supports and demonstrates how these terms may altogether apply to a thing. It shows up additionally that the precision of nonstop mechanized inventory control systems to model the rack lifetime of a thing with imperfect quality is another research hole around there.”
The “mathematical formulations consider self-assertive elements of time that permit the leader to survey the outcomes of an assorted scope of strategies by utilizing a solitary inventory formulation for each model. The proposed models might be seen as reasonable in the present serious markets and intelligent of a few handy worries as to item quality related issues. These issues identify with imperfect items got from suppliers, deterioration of goods during capacity, potential dis-area of good and imperfect items, following the quality of transient items in a supply chain and move of information starting with one inventory cycle then onto the next. The conspicuous ramifications that can be gotten from the general formulations, alongside the way that numerous pragmatic examples distributed in the literature for summed up models around there comprise uncommon instances of our proposed models, make, we feel, a significant commitment to the supply chain literature. “
We introduced “illustrative examples to help use of the model and arrangement methodology in various sensible circumstances. The got numerical outcomes mirror the learning impacts incorporated in the proposed model. The nearness of item deterioration and fluctuating demand rate essentially sway on the optimal order quantity. We watched the impact of changing every single model parameter and found that a decrease in the optimal order size doesn't really prompt a lower total least expense per unit time.”
R
EFERENCES[1] Aastrup, J., & Halldórsson, A. (2008). Epistemological role of case studies in logistics: A critical realist perspective. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 38 (10), 746-763.
[2] Abad, P. L. (2003). Optimal pricing and lot sizing under conditions of perishability, finite production and partial backlogging and lost sale. European Journal of Operational Research, 144 (3), 677-685.
[3] Agrawal, S., Banerjee, S., & Papachristos, S. (2013). Inventory model with deteriorating items, ramp-type demand and partially backlogged shortages for a two-warehouse system. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 37 (20), 8912-8929.
[4] Ahmed, M. A., Al-Khamis, T. A., & Benkherouf, L. (2013). Inventory models with ramp type demand rate, partial backlogging and general deterioration rate. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 219 (9), 4288-4307 [5] Amorim, P., Meyr, H., Almeder, C., & Almada-Lobo, B. (2013). Managing perishability in
[6] Bakker, M., Riezebos, J., & Teunter, R. H. (2012). Review of inventory systems with deterioration since 2001. European Journal of Operational Research, 221 (2), 275–284
[7] Cárdenas-Barrón, L. E. (2000). Observation on: “Economic production quantity model for items with imperfect quality” [Int. J. Production Economics 64 (2000) 59–64]. International Journal of Production Economics, 67 (2), 201.
[8] Carlson, J. G. (1973). Cubic learning curve: Precision tool for labor estimating. Manufacturing Engineering and Management, 71 (5), 22–25
[9] Chaharsooghi, SK, Heydari, J, Zegordi, SH: (2008) A reinforcement learning model for supply chain ordering management: an application to the beer game. Decis. Support Syst. 45, 949–959
[10] Chan, W. M., Ibrahim, R. N., & Lochert, P. B. (2003). A new EPQ model: integrating lower pricing, rework and reject situations. Production Planning and Control, 14 (7), 588–595.
[11] Cheng, T. (1991). An economic order quantity model with demand-dependent unit and imperfect production processes. IIE Transactions, 23 (1), 23–28.
[12] Costantino, F., Di Gravio, G., Shaban, A., & Tronci, M. (2013). Information sharing policies based on tokens to improve supply chain performances. International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, 14 (2), 133-160.
[13] Covert, R. P., & Philip, G. C. (1973). An EOQ model for items with Weibull distribution deterioration. AIIE Transactions, 5 (4), 323-326.
[14] Dar-El, E. M. (2000). Human Learning: From Learning Curves to Learning Organization. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA.
[15] Dem, H., & Singh, S. R. (2012). A two-warehouse production model with quality consideration. Procedia Engineering, 38, 3242-3259
[16] Dong, Y., Dresner, M., & Yao, Y. (2014). Beyond information sharing: An empirical analysis of vendor-managed inventory. Production and Operations Management, 23 (5), 817-828.
[17] Dye, C. Y., Hsieh, T. P., & Ouyang, L. Y. (2007). Determining optimal selling price and lot size with a varying rate of deterioration and exponential partial backlogging. European Journal of Operational Research, 181 (2), 668-678.
[18] Gaukler, G. M., Seifert, R. W., & Hausman, W. H. (2007). Item-level RFID in the retail supply chain. Production and Operations Management, 16 (1), 65–76.
[19] Ghare, P. M., & Schrader, G. F. (1963). A model for exponentially decaying inventory. Journal of Industrial Engineering, 14 (5), 238-243.
[20] Ghosh, S., & Chakrabarty, T. (2009). An order-level inventory model under two level storage system with time-dependent demand. Opsearch, 46 (3), 335-344.
[21] Giri, B. C., & Chaudhuri, K. S. (1998). Deterministic models of perishable inventory with stock dependent demand rate and nonlinear holding cost. European Journal of Operational Research, 105 (3), 467-474.
[22] Goyal, S. K., & Giri, B. C. (2001b). A comment on change and Dye (1999): An EOQ model for deteriorating items with time varying demand and partial backlogging. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 52 (2), 238 – 239.
[23] Goyal, SK, Cardenas-Barron, LE: (2002) Note on: economic production quantity model for items with imperfect quality—a practical approach. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 77, 85–87
[24] Guba, E., & Lincoln, Y. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. Denzin and Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research, Thousand Oaks: Sage, (pp. 105-117).
[25] Hartley, R. V. (1976). Operations Research- A Managerial Emphasis. Good Year Publishing Company California, 315-317.
[26] Hlioui, R., Gharbi, A., & Hajji, A. (2015). Replenishment, production and quality control strategies in three-stage supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 166, 90- 102.
[27] Huang, C. K. (2004). An optimal policy for a single-vendor single-buyer integrated production inventory problem with process unreliability consideration. International Journal of Production Economics, 91 (1), 91–98.
[28] Huang, J. Y., & Yao, M. J. (2005). On optimally coordinating inventory for a deteriorating item in a supply chain system with a single vendor and multiple buyers. Journal of the Chinese Institute of Industrial Engineers, 22 (6), 473-484
[29] Jaber, M., Goyal, S., & Imran, M. (2008). Economic production quantity model for items with imperfect quality subject to learning effects. International Journal of Production Economics, 115 (1), 143–150.
[30] Jaber, M., Nuwayhid, R. Y., & Rosen, M. A. (2004). Price-driven economic order systems from a thermodynamic point of view. International Journal of Production Research, 42 (24), 5167– 5184.
[31] Jaggi, C. K., & Mittal, M. (2011). Economic order quantity model for deteriorating items with imperfect quality. Revista Investigation Operational, 32 (2), 107-113.
[32] Jaggi, C. K., Aggarwal, K. K., & Verma, P. (2010). Two-warehouse inventory model for deteriorating items when demand is price sensitive. International Journal of Operational Research, 7 (4), 530-551.
[33] Jaggi, C. K., Goel, S. K., & Mittal, M. (2011). Economic order quantity model for deteriorating items with imperfect quality and permissible delay on payment. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations, 2 (2), 237–248.
[34] Jedermann, R., Emond, J. P., & Lang, W. (2008). Shelf-life prediction by intelligent RFiD– Technical limits of model accuracy. Dynamics in Logistics Part 7, 231-238.
[35] Jordan, R. B. (1958). Learning how to use the learning curve. N.A.A. Bulletin, 39 (5), 27–39.
[36] Ketzenberg, M., Bloemhof, J., & Gaukler, G (2015). Managing Perishables with Time and Temperature History. Production and Operations Management, 24 (1), 54-70.
[37] Ketzenberg, M., Gaukler, G., & Salin, V. (2012). Determining expiration dates for perishables. Texas A&M University Working Paper, College Station, TX.
[38] Khan, M., Jaber, M. Y., & Ahmad, A. R. (2014). An integrated supply chain model with errors in quality inspection and learning in production. Omega, 42 (1), 16-24
[39] Khouja, M: (2003) Optimizing inventory decisions in a multistage multi customer supply chain. Trans. Res. Part E. 39, 193–208
[40] Kim, T., & Glock, C. H. (2014). On the use of RFID in the management of reusable containers in closed-loop supply chains under stochastic container return quantities. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 64, 12-27.
[41] Klassen, R. D., & Vereecke, A. (2012). Social issues in supply chains: Capabilities link responsibility, risk (opportunity), and performance. International Journal of Production Economics. 140 (1), 103–115
[42] Konstantaras, I., Skouri, K., & Jaber, M. Y. (2012). Inventory models for imperfect quality items with shortages and learning in inspection. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 36 (11), 5334- 5343.
[43] Liao, J. J., Huang, K. N., & Chung, K. J. (2013). Optimal pricing and ordering policy for perishable items with limited storage capacity and partial trade credit. IMA Journal of Management Mathematics, 24 (1), 45–61. [44] Liu, JJ, Yang, P: (1996) Optimal lot-sizing in an imperfect production system with homogeneous reworkable
jobs. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 91, 517–527
[45] Lo, S. T., Wee, H. M., & Huang, W. C. (2007). An integrated production-inventory model with imperfect production processes and Weibull distribution deterioration under inflation. International Journal of Production Economics, 106 (1), 248-260.
[46] Ma, W-N, Gong, D-C, Lin, GC: (2010) An optimal production cycle time for imperfect production process with scrap. Math. Comput. Model. 52, 724–737
[47] Maddah, B., & Jaber, M. (2008). Economic order quantity for items with imperfect quality: Revisited. International Journal of Production Economics, 112 (2), 808–815
[48] Manna, S. K., & Chaudhuri, K. S. (2006). An EOQ model with ramp type demand rate, time dependent deterioration rate, unit production cost and shortages. European Journal of Operational Research, 171 (2), 557-566.
[49] McGregor, S. L. T. (2007). International Journal of Consumer Studies: decade review (1997– 2006). International Journal of Consumer Studies, 31 (1), 2–18
[50] McGregor, S. L. T. (2008). Ideological maps of consumer education. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 32 (5), 545–552.
[51] McGregor, S. L. T., & Murnane, J. A. (2010) Paradigm, methodology and method: Intellectual integrity in consumer scholarship. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 34 (4), 419-427.
[52] Moussawi-Haidar, L., & Jaber, M. Y. (2013). A joint model for cash and inventory management for a retailer under delay in payments. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 66 (4), 758-767.
[53] Munson, LC, Rosenblatt, JM: (2001) Coordinating a three-level supply chain with quantity discounts. IIE Trans. 33, 371–384
[54] Murdeshwar, T. M., & Sathe, Y. S. (1985). Some aspects of lot size model with two levels of storage. Opsearch, 22 (4), 255-262
[55] Nahmias, S. (1977). On ordering inventory when both demand and lifetime are random. Management. Science, 24 (1) 82–90. Nahmias, S. (1975). Optimal ordering policies for perishable inventory II. Operations Research, 23 (4), 735-749.
[56] Ongkunaruk, P., Wahab, M. I. M., & Chen, Y. (2016). A genetic algorithm for a joint replenishment problem with resource and shipment constraints and imperfect items. International Journal of Production Economics, 175, 142-152.
[57] Padmanabhan, G., & Vrat, P. (1995). EOQ models for perishable items under stock dependent selling rate. European Journal of Operational Research, 86 (2), 281-292
[58] Pahl, J., & Voß, S. (2014). Integrating deterioration and lifetime constraints in production and supply chain planning: A survey. European Journal of Operational Research, 238 (3), 654–674
[59] Panda, D, Maiti, M: (2009) Multi-item inventory models with price dependent demand under flexibility and reliability consideration and imprecise space constraint: a geometric programming approach. Math. Comput. Model. 49, 1733–1749
[60] Paul, S., Wahab, M. I. M., & Ongkunaruk, P. (2014). Joint replenishment with imperfect items and price discount. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 74, 179-185.
[61] Porteus, E. L. (1986). Optimal lot sizing, process quality improvement and setup cost reduction. Operations Research, 34 (1), 137-144.
[62] Rau, H., Wu, M. Y., & Wee, H. M. (2003). Integrated inventory model for deteriorating items under a multi-echelon supply chain environment. International Journal of Production Economics, 86 (2), 155-168
[63] Rosenblatt, M. J., & Lee, H. L. (1986). Economic production cycles with imperfect production processes. IIE transactions, 18 (1), 48-55.
[64] Salameh, MK, Jaber, MY: (2000) Economic production quantity model for items with imperfect quality. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 64, 59–64
[65] Sana, SS: (2010) An economic production lot size model in an imperfect production system. Eur. J. Oper. Res.
201, 158–170
[66] Sana, SS: (2011) A production-inventory model of imperfect quality products in a three-layer supply chain. Decis. Support Syst. 50, 539–547
[67] Sarkar, B., & Sarkar, S. (2013). An improved inventory model with partial backlogging, time varying deterioration and stock-dependent demand. Economic Modelling, 30, 924-932.
[68] Sarma, K. V. S. (1983). A deterministic inventory model with two levels of storage and an optimum release rule. Opsearch, 20 (3), 175-180.
[69] Sett, B. K., Sarkar, B., & Goswami, A. (2012). A two-warehouse inventory model with increasing demand and time varying deterioration. Scientia Iranica, 19 (6), 1969-1977.
[70] Shah, Y. K., & Jaiswal, M. C. (1977). An order level inventory model for a system with constant rate of deterioration, Opsearch, 14 (3), 174-184
[71] Sicilia, J., González-De-la-Rosa, M., Febles-Acosta, J., & Alcaide-López-de-Pablo, D. (2014). An inventory model for deteriorating items with shortages and time-varying demand. International Journal of Production Economics, 155, 155-162.
