• Sonuç bulunamadı

Comprehensive data concerning cosmic radiation doses at ground level and in-flights for Turkey

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Comprehensive data concerning cosmic radiation doses at ground level and in-flights for Turkey"

Copied!
7
0
0

Yükleniyor.... (view fulltext now)

Tam metin

(1)

COMPREHENSIVE DATA CONCERNING COSMIC RADIATION

DOSES AT GROUND LEVEL AND IN-FLIGHTS FOR TURKEY

A. Parmaksız

Sarayköy Nuclear Research and Training Center, Istanbul Road 30km., 06983 Saray, Ankara, Turkey aydin.parmaksiz@taek.gov.tr

Cosmic radiation doses of individuals living in 81 cities in Turkey were estimated by using CARI-6 software. Annual cosmic radiation doses of individuals were found to be between 308 µSv y-1 and 736 µSv y-1 at ground level. The population-weighted annual effective dose from cosmic radiation was determined to be 387 µSv y-1 for Turkey. Cosmic radiation doses on-board for 137 (60 domestic and 77 international) flights varied from 1.2 µSv to 83 µSv. It was estimated that six or over long-route round-trip air travels may cause cosmic radiation dose above the permissible limit for member of the public i.e. 1 mSv y-1. According to the assumption of flights throughout 800 hours on each route, cosmic radiation doses were found to be between 1.0 mSv and 4.8 mSv for aircrew.

INTRODUCTION

The earth is continuously bombarded with high-energy particles, which are known as cosmic radiation. They are generated by sun or come from outside of the solar system. High-energy particles interact with nuclei of atmospheric constituents until they lose their energies. Cascade interactions of high-energy particles cause formation of various secondary reaction products. High-energy particles as well as secondary reaction products are responsible for the cosmic radiation exposure.

The atmosphere provides a special shielding to the earth against cosmic radiation. Particles from outer space penetrate into the atmosphere and interact with its constituents until they lose their energies. Low-energy cosmic particles are adsorbed in the upper atmosphere. Only high-energy cosmic particles can reach to the sub layers of the atmosphere. Therefore, the cosmic radiation intensity decreases from the outer layer of the atmosphere towards the ground. The cosmic radiation exposure of individual increases from the ground level towards upper layers of the atmosphere accordingly. The cosmic radiation dose doubles for individuals for each 4,500 ft increment (1). At the altitude of 30,000 ft, the effective dose rate is approximately 90 times higher than the rate at sea level due to the dominance of the neutron component of cosmic radiation. The neutron component of cosmic radiation is dominant over 10,000 ft (2).

Passengers and flight crew are exposed to cosmic radiation during long-haul flights at high altitudes. Many researchers have paid special attention to flight radiation doses of individuals or occupational exposures of aircrew (3, 4). There are also some studies performed about health effects of cosmic radiation and concerns about cosmic radiation-induce carcinogenesis (5).

According to the recommendation of International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP), given in publication 60, cosmic radiation exposure of aircrew should be regarded as occupational exposure (6). European Commission expressed that each member state shall ensure make arrangements for undertakings operating aircraft to take account of exposure to cosmic radiation of aircrew that are liable to be subject to exposure to more than 1 mSv per year, according to the Euratom Directive 96/12 in Article 42 (7). Article 42 refers to article 10 and recommends special protection during pregnancy and breastfeeding for female crew. The exposure of aircrew is recommended to be accepted as planned exposure situation in 26 of later Euratom Directive 2013/59 (8). The article 35 of Directive 2013/59 recommended that relevant requirements should be applied for aircrew whose exposure is exceed 6 mSv y-1, allowing for the specific

features of this exposure situation. The article 35 of Directive 2013/59 states that competent authority requires the undertaking to take appropriate measures for aircrew whose effective dose is above 1 mSv y-1.

Relevant requirements are given in aforementioned article (8).

Figure 1 shows the airline passenger statistic made in Turkish airports between 2003 and 2014 (9, 10, and 11). The statistic gives an important hint about increment of air travels in the future. This means that more people will be exposed to cosmic radiation originated from air travels in the coming years. However, there is no comprehensive study or data to evaluate cosmic radiation doses of individuals or flight crew in Turkey.

Due to the variation of each country’s living conditions, geography and industry, many countries investigate country-specific exposure of members of public originated from natural and artificial radiation sources. It requires to determine the amount of each

(2)

2 component constituting the radiation dose in order to achieve this. The cosmic radiation dose is a component which cannot be neglected among them. Therefore, cosmic radiation doses of individuals living in eighty-one cities of Turkey were calculated by using CARI-6 software (12). The population-weighted annual effective dose from cosmic radiation was estimated for Turkey. Both for domestic and international flights, cosmic radiation doses on-board were calculated in this study. It is considered that results of the study will provide a considerable contribution to national and also regional and world data related to cosmic radiation exposures of individuals. This study can also help researchers who need to know the contribution of cosmic radiation dose in dating of archaeological samples. 0 10,000,000 20,000,000 30,000,000 40,000,000 50,000,000 60,000,000 70,000,000 80,000,000 90,000,000 100,000,000 110,000,000 120,000,000 130,000,000 140,000,000 150,000,000 160,000,000 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 P as sen ger Year Domestic International

Figure 1. Airline passenger statistics of Turkey

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cosmic radiation doses at ground level

The CARI-6 computer program, developed by the Federal Aviation Administration’s (FAA) Civil Aerospace Medical Institute, calculates the flight radiation dose received by an individual or aircrew (12). The program calculates doses by using changes in altitude and geographic location of airports. Software has also capable of calculating the effective dose rate from galactic radiation at any location in the atmosphere at altitude up 60.000 ft. CARI-6 can calculate the average on 12 months cosmic dose rate for any year from 1958 to 2014. Exposures were calculated by using altitude, coordinate information and mean value dose rate of 2014 in this study (13, 14). In the calculations, it was not taken into consideration the backscattered or secondary reaction products of cosmic radiation that come from soil.

Cosmic radiation doses at flights

Cosmic radiation dose estimation in high altitudes is a challenging task due to particle composition, their energies and complex interactions. To overcome this challenging task, many software have been developed during the last decade by research projects focused on this problem. Flight time, ascending and descending time, geographic information (latitude, longitude) and route information are basic parameters of codes that are used for calculations (15).

Dose calculations were performed with two different approaches as domestic and international flights in the study. Istanbul and Ankara are bustling metropolises of Turkey and most of flights (including connecting flights) are made from these airports. Cosmic radiation doses from domestic flights were calculated by using thirty-two routes from Atatürk Airport (Istanbul) and twenty-eight routes from Esenboğa Airport (Ankara). Durations of domestic flights are generally no more than two hours and they were considered to be performed at the altitude of around 32,000 ft. Exposures were calculated by using CARI-6 software. Flight times were taken from Turkish Airlines website (16). Ascending and descending times were regarded as 40 minutes (20 minutes take off and 20 minutes landing). There was no information about local airports and latest heliocentric potentials in the database of CARI-6. Therefore, local airports’ information (coordinates, altitudes) was obtained from General Directorate of State Airports Authority (DHMI) (9). Recent heliocentric potentials were also obtained from Federal Aviation Administration website (12).

Almost all international flights are carried out from Istanbul in Turkey. Thus, cosmic radiation doses of flights from Istanbul to international airports were calculated by using CARI-6 computer codes. Ascending and descending times, number of en-routes, en-route altitudes and en-route times are required parameters for flight dose calculations for the program. CARI (via FAA website) also allow users to make online free flight dose calculations.

For international flights, most of cruising data used to calculate cosmic radiation doses were derived from similar studies performed in literature (3, 17) and Radiation Protection 88 report of the European Commission (18). Accordingly, international flights were considered to be performed in two altitudes as 34,000 ft and 39,000 ft. Each of ascending and descending times were accepted as 30 minutes (total 1 hour) and flight times were taken equal for 34,000 ft (50% of flight) and 39,000 ft (50% of remain flight). Cosmic radiation dose results were given based on the monthly average of 2014.

(3)

CARI-6 has been validated by measurements (19). Differences between measurement and simulations remain below 20%. (15, 19). Detailed information related to uncertainties of dose assessment can be found in the European Commission report of Radiation Protection 140 (19).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS

Effective doses at ground level for Turkish provinces

Cosmic radiation doses at ground level were calculated by CARI-6 software by using coordinates and altitudes of Turkish provinces. Annual cosmic radiation doses of individuals living in each province are given in Figure 2.

Cosmic radiation doses were found to be between 308 µSv y-1 and 736 µSv y-1 with an average of 429

µSv y-1 for eighty-one provinces. The maximum

cosmic radiation dose was determined for Ardahan, with an altitude of 1870 m, and the lowest dose was calculated for Içel which is only 6 m above the sea level.

Population-weighted annual effective dose from cosmic radiation at ground level for Turkey

The majority of cities, where the population is crowded, are located at altitudes below 1,000 meters in Turkey. Istanbul with 13.9 million people is the most crowded city of Turkey and its population corresponds approximately 20 percent of country’s population. For cosmic radiation exposure, population-weighted effective dose was calculated to be 387 µSv y-1 for

Turkey. According to UNSCEAR 2000 report, average worldwide exposure from cosmic radiation is 390 µSv y-1. Calculation result of population weighted effective

dose is consistent with literature.

Cosmic radiation doses for domestic flights

It is very difficult to estimate the flight profile of airliners. Each aircraft tries to fly at an altitude where has the maximum benefit depending on the load, distance, fuel consumption and weather conditions. Thus, pilots can use more than one route or altitude in their flights (20). Durations of flights from Istanbul to domestic airports vary between 55 minutes and 130 minutes with an average of 94 minute. Ağrı and Van cruises take the longest time in domestic flights. Cosmic radiation doses of flights from Istanbul to domestic airports are presented in Figure 3.

736 731 693 654 650 639 618 594 558 543 538 533 521 521 514 510 500 482 480 473 472 469 466 465 464 464 457 452 451 450 447 447 445 444 441 441 434 428 427 424 418 410 400 399 394 391 388 388 382 377 373 372 360 356 354 345 343 341 338 333 330 330 328 328 326 326 326 325 325 325 324 324 324 324 323 320 316 313 313 310 308 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 ARDAHANERZURUM KARSVAN HAKKARİAĞRI BAYBURTBİTLİS MUŞ YOZGATSİVAS ŞIRNAK NEVŞEHİR ERZİNCAN GÜMÜŞHANENİĞDE BİNGÖL KAYSERİELAZIĞ AFYON MARDİN ISPARTA KIRŞEHİRKONYA KARAMANKÜTAHYA MALATYATUNCELİ BURDURUŞAK IĞDIR ANKARA AKSARAY KASTAMONUÇORUM SİİRT ESKİŞEHİRBOLU ÇANKIRI GAZİANTEPKIRIKKALE TOKAT DİYARBAKIRADIYAMAN ARTVİN MUĞLABİLECİK KİLİS KAHRAMANMARAŞBATMAN AMASYA ŞANLIURFAKARABÜK KIRKLARELİDENİZLİ DÜZCE BURSA İSTANBUL BALIKESİREDİRNE SİNOP BARTIN SAKARYA ZONGULDAKTEKİRDAĞ SAMSUN OSMANİYETRABZON RİZE MANİSA GİRESUNYALOVA KOCAELİORDU ÇANAKKALEAYDIN İZMİR HATAY ANTALYAADANA İÇEL

Effective dose (µSv/y)

P

rovinc

e

(4)

4 2.73.4 4.7 1.72.1 1.4 3.9 1.2 2.1 3.9 3.74.0 4.0 3.4 2.3 2.1 1.6 3.4 4.5 2.6 2.63.2 4.1 1.82.3 4.2 2.32.9 3.2 3.13.3 4.6 0 1 2 3 4 5 Adana AdıyamanAğrı Ankara Antalya BalıkesirBatman ÇanakkaleDenizli DiyarbakırElazığ Erzincan Erzurum GaziantepGazipaşa IspartaIzmir KahramanmaraşKars KayseriKonya MalatyaMardin Milas MuğlaMuş NevşehirSamsun ŞanlıurfaSivas TrabzonVan Effective dose (µSv) D e st ina ti on

Figure 3. Cosmic radiation doses of flights from Istanbul to domestic airports

The highest dose (4.7 µSv) in domestic flights was calculated for Ağrı, which has longest duration. For Çanakkale-Istanbul flight, passengers or crewmembers receive the lowest dose (1.2 µSv). According to the Turkish regulation, annual flight time shall not exceed 1,000 hours for aircrew (21). However, 800 hours was considered to be acceptable value for annual flight time. Figure 4 gives effective doses of typical flights throughout 800 hours flying on these routes. Effective doses of flights from Istanbul to domestic airports throughout 800 hours were calculated to be between 1.0 mSv and 1.7 mSv.

Ankara is located in the central region of the country when compared with Istanbul. Cosmic exposures are given in Figure 5. Flight durations from Ankara to domestic airports are lower from Istanbul (between 55 minutes and 95 minutes). Cosmic radiation doses received by aircrew or passengers during flights from Ankara to domestic airports were found to be between 1.2 µSv (Samsun) and 3.1 µSv (Kars). Effective doses of typical flights throughout 800 hours are presented in Figure 6. They were calculated to be between 1.0 mSv and 1.6 mSv for 28 routes from Ankara to domestic airports.

1.41.6 1.7 1.31.3 1.1 1.6 1.0 1.3 1.6 1.61.7 1.7 1.6 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.6 1.7 1.51.7 1.51.6 1.21.4 1.7 1.41.5 1.51.6 1.61.7 0 1 2 Adana AdıyamanAğrı Ankara Antalya BalıkesirBatman ÇanakkaleDenizli DiyarbakırElazığ Erzincan Erzurum GaziantepGazipaşa IspartaIzmir KahramanmaraşKars KayseriKonya MalatyaMardin Milas MuğlaMuş NevşehirSamsun ŞanlıurfaSivas TrabzonVan

Effective dose for 800 h (mSv)

D

e

sti

n

ation

Figure 4. Cosmic radiation doses of flights from Istanbul to domestic airports throughout 800 hours

1.61.9 1.7 1.62.1 1.6 1.6 1.62.1 2.12.2 1.8 1.61.7 2.3 1.9 3.1 1.71.9 2.5 1.8 2.8 1.2 2.1 1.9 1.7 2.4 2.8 0 1 2 3 4 Adana AdıyamanAğrı Antalya BalıkesirBatman Denizli DiyarbakırElazığ Erzincan Erzurum GaziantepGazipaşa IspartaIzmir KahramanmaraşKars Kayseri MalatyaMardin MilasMuş Samsun ŞanlıurfaSiirt Sivas TrabzonVan Effective dose (µSv) D e sti n ation

Figure 5. Cosmic radiation doses of flights from Ankara to domestic airports

(5)

1.21.3 1.3 1.21.3 1.2 1.2 1.21.3 1.31.4 1.2 1.21.3 1.4 1.31.6 1.31.3 1.4 1.21.5 1.0 1.3 1.3 1.31.4 1.5 0 1 2 Adana AdıyamanAğrı Antalya BalıkesirBatman Denizli DiyarbakırElazığ Erzincan Erzurum GaziantepGazipaşa IspartaIzmir KahramanmaraşKars Kayseri MalatyaMardin MilasMuş Samsun ŞanlıurfaSiirt Sivas TrabzonVan

Effective dose for 800 h (mSv)

D

e

sti

n

ation

Figure 6. Cosmic radiation doses of flights from Ankara to domestic airports throughout 800 hours

Cosmic radiation doses for international flights

CARI-6 software was used to calculate route doses for seventy-seven international flights during the period of 2014. Cosmic radiation dose results calculated by CARI-6 are presented in Figure 7. The smallest dose was calculated to be 4 µSv for Tel Aviv route which has the shortest duration (2 hours). The highest cosmic radiation dose was found to be 83 µSv for Los Angeles route which has the highest duration of about 14 hours. Effective doses of international flights routes throughout 800 hours are given in Figure 8. They were calculated to be between 1.8 mSv and 4.8 mSv.

Results of the current study reveal that aircrew is exposed to relatively more cosmic radiation on international flights especially long-haul routes in comparison with domestic flights. If the maximum exposure value (83 µSv for Los Angeles route) is used for dose calculation, six round-trip long-haul air travels can cause a cosmic radiation dose over the recommended value of 1 mSv y-1 for member of

public. 16 11 78 10 20 813 37 65 37 37 19 69 13 5 13 1315 1114 1013 19 30 6 17 8 7 20 47 10 49 8 19 16 43 9 19 11 812 26 19 7 15 14 1418 17 14 8 17 1011 10 27 6 16 1015 1016 1724 811 1220 16 83 6468 16 12 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Kabul Algiers ViennaBaku BahrainDhaka Minsk Brussels Sao PauloToronto Beijing ShanghaiKinshasa Zagreb Prague CopenhagenCairo Tallinn Addis AbabaHelsinki Lyon Paris BerlinBonn Accra Hong KongBudapest Delhi Tehran BaghdadDublin Tel AvivRome TorinoTokyo AmmanAlmaty NairobiSeoul Kuwait BishkekRiga Vilnius Luxembourg Kuala LumpurMale Malta Casablanca AmsterdamRotterdam Oslo Muscat Karachi WarsawLisbon Doha MoscowRiyadh SingaporeLjubljana Madrid Khartoum StockholmZurich Dushanbe KilimanjaroBangkok Tunis AshgabatDubai EdinburgLondon Los AngelesNew York WashingtonTashkent Sana Effective dose (µSv) D e sti n ation

Figure 7. Cosmic radiation dose results for international flights

(6)

6 2.5 2.42.4 2.3 2.02.3 2.73.0 2.1 4.7 3.2 2.9 2.02.2 2.73.2 1.9 3.3 1.9 3.4 2.73.0 2.93.0 2.02.4 2.22.3 2.2 2.0 3.5 1.82.3 2.6 3.5 2.1 2.9 1.9 3.3 2.1 2.8 3.1 2.82.9 2.0 1.92.1 2.5 3.1 3.13.6 2.12.1 2.72.7 2.1 3.0 2.0 2.02.3 2.7 1.9 3.4 2.7 2.6 1.92.1 2.22.4 2.1 3.6 3.2 4.8 4.5 4.6 2.7 2.0 0 1 2 3 4 5 Kabul Algiers ViennaBaku BahrainDhaka Minsk Brussels Sao PauloToronto Beijing ShanghaiKinshasa Zagreb Prague CopenhagenCairo Tallinn Addis AbabaHelsinki Lyon Paris BerlinBonn Accra Hong KongBudapest Delhi Tehran BaghdadDublin Tel AvivRome TorinoTokyo AmmanAlmaty NairobiSeoul Kuwait BishkekRiga Vilnius Luxembourg Kuala LumpurMale Malta Casablanca AmsterdamRotterdam Oslo Muscat Karachi WarsawLisbon Doha MoscowRiyadh SingaporeLjubljana Madrid Khartoum StockholmZurich Dushanbe KilimanjaroBangkok Tunis AshgabatDubai EdinburgLondon Los AngelesNew York WashingtonTashkent Sana

Effective dose for 800 h (mSv)

D

e

tinat

io

n

Figure 8. Cosmic radiation doses of international flights throughout 800 hours

CONCLUSION

Cosmic radiation doses at ground level were calculated for Turkish provinces by using CARI-6 software. Results ranged from 308 µSv y-1 to 736 µSv y-1.

Population-weighted annual effective dose originated from cosmic radiation at ground level was calculated to be 387 µSv y-1.

Cosmic radiation doses on-board were estimated for 137 routes (60 domestic 77 international). According to the assumption 800 hours on each route, effective doses were calculated to be between 1.0 mSv and 4.8 mSv. Therefore, as Turkish aircrew are exposed to cosmic radiation within a range from 1 mSv y-1 to 6 mSv y-1, individual dose estimation is required.

Radiation exposure should be assessed for all flights and crewmembers should be informed regarding possible effects. National studies concerning assessment of the magnitude of aircrew doses should be encouraged.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This study was supported by Turkish Atomic Energy Authority and conducted within the scope of activities of Health Physics Department of Sarayköy Nuclear Research and Training Center.

REFERENCES

1. Aw., J.J., Cosmic radiation and commercial air travel, J Travel Med., 10, 19-28, (2003).

2. Bagshaw, B., Cosmic radiation in commercial aviation, Travel Medicine and infectious disease, 6, 125-127, (2008).

3. Colgan, P.A., Synnot, H., Fenton, D., Individual and collective doses from cosmic radiation in Ireland, Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 123, 426-434, (2007). 4. Bouville, A., and Lowder, W.M., Human population

exposure to cosmic radiation, Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 24, 293-299, (1988).

5. Langner, I., Blatner, M., Gundestrup, M., Storm, H., Aspholm, R., Auvinen, A., Pukkala, E., Hammer, G.P., Zeeb, H., Hrafnkelsson, J., Rafnsson, V., Tulinius, H., De Angelis, G., Verdecchia, A., Holdersen, T., Tveten, U., Eliasch, H., Hammer, N., Linnersjö, A., Cosmic radiation and cancer mortality among airline pilots: results from a European cohort study (ESCAPE), Radiat Environ Biophys, 42, 247-256, (2004).

6. International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP), ICRP Publication 60: Recommendations of the international Commission on Radiological Protection, Ann. ICRP 21(1-3), (1991).

7. European Commission (EC), Council Directive 96/29/EURATOM, (1996).

(7)

8. European Commission (EC), Council Directive 2013/59/EURATOM, (2013).

9. General Directorate of Civil Aviation Authority (SHGM), www.shgm.gov.tr/, (2014).

10. General Directorate of State Airports Authority (DHMI), http://www.dhmi.gov.tr/, (2014).

11. Turkish Statistical Institute (TUIK), http://www.tuik.gov.tr/, (2014).

12. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Civil

Aeromedical Institute, CARI-6,

http://www.faa.gov/data_research/research/med_humanf

acs/aeromedical/radiobiology/, (2004).

13. Republic of Turkey General Directorate of Highways (KGM), http://www.kgm.gov.tr/, (2014).

14. Geonames website, http://www.geonames.org/, (2014). 15. Bottollier-Depois, J.F., Beck, P., Bennet, B., Bennet, L.,

Bütikofer, R., Clairand, I., Desorgher, L., Dyer, C., Felsberger, E., Flückiger, E., Hands, A., Kindl, P., Latocha, M., Lewis, B., Leuthold, G., Maczka, T., Mares, V., McCall, M.J., O’Brian, K., Rollet, S., Rühm, W., Wissmann, F., Comparison of computer codes assessing galactic cosmic radiation exposure of aircraft

crew, Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 136, 317-323, (2009).

16. Turkish Airlines (THY),

http://www.turkishairlines.com/, (2014).

17. McAulay, I.R., Regulatory control of aircrew exposure to cosmic radiation, Health Physics, 79, 596-599, (2000).

18. European Commission (EC), Recommendations for the implementation of Title VII of the European Basic Safety Standards Directive (BSS) concerning significant increase in exposure due to natural radiation sources, Radiation Protection 88, (1997).

19. European Commission (EC), Cosmic radiation exposure of aircraft crew: Compilation of measured and calculated data, Radiation Protection 140, (2004). 20. Zarrouk, N., Bennaceur, R., Estimates of cosmic

radiation exposure on Tunisian passenger aircraft, Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 130, 419-426, (2008). 21. http://web.shgm.gov.tr/doc3/shy6a50.doc

Referanslar

Benzer Belgeler

Liver tissue section (a) The control group had nor- mal parenchymal structure, (b–e) The liver tissue of pyc- nogenol extract groups was shown similar to histological features of

The evaluation of mean and first quartile values have been recommended for optimization processes (9). The present study compared the mean and first quartile values from

Schematic view (left) and photograph (right) of the Wulf’s electroscope. In the schematic view; Q: quartz fibres, B: amber for electrical isolation, J: container for the metallic

We intend to spot-light the prototype space-time element and the particle’s motion from the stand points of the two Global structures of colliding gravitational

Üçüncü bölümde Das[1]’a ait olan mutlak Nörlund ve mutlak Riesz toplanabilme metotlarıyla ilgili Tauberian teoremlerinin yanısıra ve

Şimdi Yaşar Kemal, bütün büyük yazarlarımız adı­ na bu ödülü alıyor ve Türkiye’yi bir “kültür ülkesi” o- larak taçlandırıyor.. Ve böylece Yunus

doğru isimlendirilen noktaları maviye boyayalım. Dünya'nın küre şeklinde olduğunu ortaya atmıştır. Yukarıdaki bilim insanları ile görüşleri eşleştirilmesi

this bit is logic one,the microprocessor will move the next character from memory buffer location to the transmit data register.If the TDRE bit is a logic 0,CTS bit must be checked