Practical Approach to PCOS Women Wishing to Conceive
Prof. Dr. Basil C. Tarlatzis
Unit for Human Reproduction
First Department of Obstetrics & Gynevology Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece
Disclosures
•
Vice President of the Board of Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece•
Advisory Board, Consultations, lectures, traveling and research grants from MSD, Merck Serono, IBSA, Ferring and OvasciencePCOS
Prevalence
n
5-10% general female population
n
Up to 30% of infertility population
ESHRE / ASRM PCOS Concensus Meeting, Rotterdam, May 2003
PCOS Diagnosis
- 2003 Rotterdam Consensus -
Hyperandrogenemia
Oligo/anovulation
PCOS
PCO
2nd ESHRE/ASRM PCOS Consensus Meeting, Thessaloniki, 2007
PCOS: Management
n
Life-style changes
n
Ovulation induction
n
Metformin and other insulin- sensitising drugs
n
Laparoscopic ovarian surgery
n
In Vitro Fertilization
3rd ESHRE/ASRM PCOS Consensus Meeting,
Amsterdam, 2010
"
Adolescence
"
Hirsutism/acne/alopecia
"
Menstrual irregularity
"
Contraception
"
Quality of life
"
Pregnancy
"
Ethnic differences
"
Obesity
"
Insulin resistance/Metabolic Syndrome
"
Type 2 diabetes
"
Cardiovasc. disease markers and outcomes
"
Cancer risk
"
Menopause, general health
PCOS: Health Risks
PCOS Women: Approaches to Conceive
n
Potential problems
n
Management strategy
n
Predictions
Obesity and PCOS
5 10 15 20
< 25 25-30 >30
Category of Average BMI
Obesity and PCOS
Teede et al 2010
Prevalence of PCOS
8600 Australian women followed longitudinally
Conclusions (agreement):
v The prevalence of obesity is increasing and has an
important bearing on the phenotype of PCOS (level B).
v Some studies suggest that higher BMI is associated with a greater prevalence of menstrual irregularity,
hyperandrogenemia, and hirsutism but more studies are required to confirm this (level B).
Obesity and PCOS
Insulin Resistance and
Metabolic Syndrome in PCOS
NHANES Control PCOS
~90%
~85%
~8
%
~60%
1%
~10%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
NGT IGT DM
~16%
0%
*P<0.001
BMI (kg/m2)
25< 25-30 ≥30
1% 0%
12%
45%
68%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
17%
PCOS
Leading Risk Factor Prediabetes & MetS
Ages 14 – 40 Years
Adapted from Legro et al. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84:165-169, 1999 Palmert et al. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87:1017-1023, 2002
Glucose Tolerance Metabolic Syndrome
~30%
Prevalence of impaired glucose tolerance (BMI matched)
Study or Subgroup Rajkhowa 1996 Yarali 2001 Dunaif 2001 Phy 2004 Faloia 2004
Sawathiparnich 2005 Diamanti-Kandarakis 2005 Alvarez-Blasco 2006 Attuoua 2008
Total (95% CI) Total events
Heterogeneity: Chi² = 9.97, df = 8 (P = 0.27); I² = 20%
Test for overall effect: Z = 3.22 (P = 0.001) Events
10 1 3 4 3 0 1 4 18
44
Total 72 30 14 7 50 6 29 32 107
347
Events 1 0 0 2 1 3 0 8 5
20
Total 39 30 12 18 20 6 22 72 100
319
Weight 6.9%
2.9%
2.5%
3.0%
8.3%
20.0%
3.3%
26.6%
26.5%
100.0%
M-H, Fixed, 95% CI 6.13 [0.75, 49.80]
3.10 [0.12, 79.23]
7.61 [0.35, 163.82]
10.67 [1.31, 86.93]
1.21 [0.12, 12.40]
0.08 [0.00, 1.96]
2.37 [0.09, 60.96]
1.14 [0.32, 4.11]
3.84 [1.37, 10.79]
2.54 [1.44, 4.47]
Year 1996 2001 2001 2004 2004 2005 2005 2006 2008
PCOS Control Odds Ratio Odds Ratio
M-H, Fixed, 95% CI
0.01 0.1 1 10 100
Lower risk for PCOS Higher risk for PCOS
Moran et al 2010
Insulin Sensitivity in Ovulatory &
Anovulatory PCOS
0 100 200 300 400
control ovPCO anovPCO
0 50 100 150 200 250
control ovPCO anovPCO
Insulin area mU/l Insulin sensitivity mmol/l/min
(147-277)
(148-355)
(239-734)
p< 0.01 p< 0.01
Robinson et al, Clin Endocrinol 1993 39 351
Prevalence of metabolic syndrome in PCOS (BMI matched)
Study or Subgroup Faloia 2004
Alvarez-Blasco 2006 Shroff 2007b
Attuoua 2008 Gulcelik 2008
Total (95% CI) Total events
Heterogeneity: Chi² = 6.47, df = 4 (P = 0.17); I² = 38%
Test for overall effect: Z = 3.23 (P = 0.001) Events
10 8 6 17 20
61
Total 50 32 24 107 60
273
Events 3 19 4 4 7
37
Total 20 72 24 100 60
276
Weight 14.7%
37.6%
12.9%
14.9%
20.0%
100.0%
M-H, Fixed, 95% CI 1.42 [0.35, 5.80]
0.93 [0.36, 2.42]
1.67 [0.40, 6.87]
4.53 [1.47, 13.98]
3.79 [1.46, 9.82]
2.20 [1.36, 3.56]
Year 2004 2006 2007 2008 2008
PCOS Control Odds Ratio Odds Ratio
M-H, Fixed, 95% CI
0.001 0.1 1 10 1000
Lower risk for PCOS Higher risk for PCOS
Moran et al 2010
Goverde et al , Hum. Reprod 24, 710, 2009
PCOS Phenotypes and Metabolic
Disturbances
Conclusions (agreement):
v Not all PCOS phenotypes have similar metabolic risk.
The combination of hyperandrogenemia and
oligomenorrhea signifies the most at risk group (level B).
v It is critical for public health and for optimum design of long-term studies to stratify women with PCOS according to metabolic risk.
IR and MetS in PCOS
PCOS and type 2 diabetes
mellitus
Meta-analysis of studies reporting risk of T2D in women with PCOS
n
IGT: OR 2.54 [1.44 - 4.47]
n
T2D: OR 4.00 [1.97 - 8.10]
in BMI-matched groups
35 studies analysed
Moran et al Hum Reprod Update 2010 16 347-63
Gestational diabetes in women with PCOS
n High prevalence (52%) of polycystic ovaries in women with history of GDM
n Kousta et al, Clin Endocrinol 2000 53 501-7
n Women with PCOS at increased risk of GDM (OR 2.94 (1.7 - 5.1)
n Boomsma et al, Hum Reprod Update 2006 12 673-683 (meta-analysis)
n High prevalence of GDM in women with PCOS (42% of 50 women)
n Veltman-Verhulst et al, Hum Reprod 2010 (Epub, October)
PCOS and pregnancy outcome:
the role of hyperglycemia
20-30%
GDM in women with PCOS
1-14%
GDM in healthy women
Ben-Haroush , Diabet med 2004
Summary statement
pregnancy outcomes in PCOS
Outcome
Meta-
analysis1 ===
Boomsma, HRU’06
Meta-
analysis2 ===
Kjerulff, AJOG’11
Population based cohort ===
Roos, BMJ ’11
Gest. diabetes 2.9 2.8 2.3
Pre-eclampsia 3.5 4.2 1.5
Preterm birth 1.8 2.2 2.2
Fauser B , 2015
Conclusions (agreement):
v PCOS is a major risk factor for developing IGT and T2D (level A).
v Obesity (by amplifying IR) is an exacerbating factor in the development of IGT and T2D in PCOS (level A).
v Diet and lifestyle are first choice in improving fertility and prevention of diabetes (level B).
PCOS and Type 2 Diabetes Melitus
Conclusions (agreement):
v Screening for IGT and T2D should be performed by OGTT (75gr, 0 and 2h values). There is no utility for measuring insulin in most cases (level C).
v Screening should be performed in the following conditions:
hyperandrogenism with anovulation, acanthosis nigricans, obesity (BMI > 30 kg/m2, or > 25 in Asian populations), in women with a family history of T2D or GDM (level C).
v The increasing prevalence of obesity in the population
suggests that a further increase in diabetes in PCOS is to be expected.
PCOS and Type 2 Diabetes Melitus
Conclusions (agreement):
v Diet and lifestyle are first choice in improving fertility and prevention of diabetes (level B).
v Metformin may be used for IGT and T2D (level A). Avoid use of other insulin sensitizing agents, such as
thiazolidinediones (GPP).
PCOS and Type 2 Diabetes Melitus
PCOS: Management
n
Life-style changes Diet
Exercise
Intervention strategies
Weight
Weight change %
Insulin with GTT
Moran et al Cochrane 2010
Weight Loss in PCOS: Results of RCT
Control
(n=84)
Intervention
(n=87)
Weight loss (kg)
1.3 (0.2) 4.7 (0.3)
Pregnancies at 18months
18
(21.4%)
53 (61%)
Miscarriage 3
(16.6%)
6 (11.3%)
ART
pregnancies
9% 37%
Spontaneous pregnancies
11% 24%
*
*
* p<0.001
*
*
Moran et al, 2003
Lifestyle changes in women with PCOS
n Lifestyle intervention improves body composition, hyperandrogenism (high male hormones and clinical effects) and insulin resistance in women with PCOS.
n There was no evidence of effect for lifestyle intervention on improving glucose tolerance or lipid profiles and no literature assessing clinical reproductive outcomes,
quality of life and treatment satisfaction
Moran et al, Cochrane Dtabase Syst Rev 2011
n
Lifestyle management better than drugs
n
Few randomised trials
n
Dropouts major problem
n
Almost impossible to maintain
n
No evidence for one type of diet
n
Metformin addition has no benefit for weight
n
Bariatric surgery may be required
(Avoid pregnancy during rapid weight loss)
Intervention strategies
PCOS: Management
n
Life-style changes
n
Ovulation induction
n
Metformin and other insulin- sensitising drugs
n
Laparoscopic ovarian surgery
n
In Vitro Fertilization
PCOS: Management
n
Ovulation induction Clomiphene citrate Aromatase inhibitors
Gonadotropins +/- GnRH analogues
Imani B et al. Fertil Steril 77:91, 2002
FAI
0
5
10
Chance of ovulation (%)
95 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20
oligomenorrhea
20 30 40
amenorrhea
20 30 40
Required screening information - Amenorrhea or oligomenorrhea - BMI (kg/m2)
- FAI (T x 100/SHBG) - Age (y)
BMI
Chance of ovulation (%) 100
80 60 40 20
Chance of a live birth (%)
(95% CI)
5 ( 1-16) 10 ( 5-20) 20 (14-30) 30 (24-40) 40 (33-49) 50 (42-59) 60 (52-69) 80 (70-88)
amenorrhea
20 25 30 35 40
oligomenorrhea
20 25 30 35 40
Age
Prediction of Ovulation Induction Outcome
Imani et al., Fertil Steril, 2002
PCOS: Management
n
Life-style changes
n
Ovulation induction
n
Metformin and other insulin- sensitising drugs
n
Laparoscopic ovarian surgery
n
In Vitro Fertilization
Surgical management of polycystic ovary syndrome
Multiple ovarian puncture performed either by diathermy or by laser is well known as “Ovarian drilling”
Gjonnaess 1984
Ovarian drilling is a modification of ovarian wedge resection but less invasive
Surgical laparoscopic removal of ovarian tissue was introduced by Palmer and De Brux in 1967
Laparoscopic Ovarian Surgery for Ovulation Induction in Anovulatory PCOS Women: Live Births
Farquahar et al, Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012
Laparoscopic Ovarian Surgery for Ovulation Induction in Anovulatory PCOS Women: Multiples
Farquahar et al, Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012
PCOS: Management
Conclusions
Ovulation Induction in PCOS:
Conclusions
Before initiation of infertility treatment, it is necessary to assess the risk factors associated with PCOS
Life-style modifications should be advised before ovulation induction in obese PCOS women and weight
loss is recommended as first-line therapy in obese women with PCOS seeking pregnancy
It is important to make prediction of poossible success
for the various treatment options
Laparoscopic ovarian drilling is as effective as
gonadotropins for ovulation induction and achievement of pregnancy but with significantly less multiples
Ovulation Induction in PCOS:
Conclusions
First Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology Medical School
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece Professor B.C. Tarlatzis
Acknowledgments E.M. Kolibianakis D.G. Goulis
G. Grimbizis G. Pados H. Bili
K.A. Toulis G. Mintziori C.A. Venetis J. Bosdou L. Zepiridis