• Sonuç bulunamadı

Current  prac+ce  in   poor  responders

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Current  prac+ce  in   poor  responders"

Copied!
33
0
0

Yükleniyor.... (view fulltext now)

Tam metin

(1)

Current  prac+ce  in   poor  responders  

Sesh  K  Sunkara  

 

Barking  Havering  Redbridge  University  Hospitals,  UK   University  of  Aberdeen,  UK  

   

(2)

Background  

•  Poor  ovarian  response  (POR)  remains  a   therapeu(c  challenge  in  IVF  

•  Increasing  incidence  as  women  delay   childbearing  

•  Frequency  of  diminished  ovarian  reserve   (DOR)  –10  %  in  2003  and  18%  in  2013  

(www.sart.org)    

(3)

Background  

•  Incidence  of  POR  6  –  20%  of  IVF  cycles  (www.IVF-­‐

Worldwide.com)  

•  Wide-­‐range  reflects  varied  demographics  and   definiSons  

•  Inconsistent,  inconclusive  evidence  on   strategies  for  management  of  PR    

 

(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)

•  OpSmise  number  of  oocytes  and  maximise   live  birth  

•  Minimise  treatment  burden  

0   10   20   30   40  

Live birth rate (%)

1   5   10   15   20   25   30   35   40  

Egg number

Sunkara  et  al.,  Hum  Reprod  2011    

POR:  treatment  objec+ve  

(9)

Ø Pituitary  suppression  regimens   Ø SSmulaSon  approaches  

•       ConvenSonal  sSmulaSon:  gonadotrophin  dose  

•       Mild  sSmulaSon,  natural  cycle  

•       Double  sSmulaSon  

Ø Adjuvant  therapies  

•       DHEA,  testosterone,  luteinising  hormone  (LH)  

•       Growth  hormone  (GH)  

•       E2  priming  

Ø Oocyte/  embryo  accumulaSon  

Treatment  strategies  

(10)

 

•  Bologna  criteria   poor  responder  

•  Level  1  

Evidence  

(11)

•  POR  definiSon:  previous  cancelled  IVF  cycle  or  

≤  3  oocytes  following  sSmulaSon  with   gonadotrophin  ≥  300  IU/  day    

•  Mean  AFC  <  7  

(12)

 Characteris+cs   Agonist  long   regimen       Group  A     (37)  

Agonist  short   regimen    

  Group  B   (37)  

Antagonist   regimen   Group  C  

(37)  

Overall   P  value    

A  vs  B   P  value  

A  vs  C   P  value  

B  vs  C   P  value  

S+mula+on  days   (Mean  ±  SD)  

12.4  ±  2.7   10.5  ±  2.4   10.5  ±  2.5   0.006   0.005   0.009   0.91  

Cancelled  cycles  

N  (%)   3  (8.1%)   4  (10.8%)   6  (16.2%)          0.82  

Oocytes  retrieved     (Mean  ±  SD)  

4.42  ±  3.06    2.71  ±  1.60    3.30  ±  2.91   0.04   0.01   0.21   0.34  

Fer+lisa+on  rate   (%)    

52.4%   48.6%   49.4%   0.28   0.52   0.18   0.61  

Pregnancies  (N)   8   4   6      

Ongoing  

pregnancies  (N)  

3   3   6  

Sunkara  et  al.,  FerSl  Steril  2014    

Bologna  

criteria  

ü  

Level  1  

ü  

×  

ü   ü  

(13)

•  POR  definiSon:  previous  cancelled  IVF  cycle,  <  

8  follicles  or  <  5  oocytes  following  sSmulaSon   with  gonadotrophin  ≥  300  IU/  day  OR  

•  Basal  FSH  >  10,  AFC  ≤  8,  AMH  <  1ng/L  

(14)

Maximal  gonadotrophin  dose  

Bologna  

criteria  

 ×  

Level  1  

ü  

Lefebvre  et  al.,  FerSl  Steril  2015    

(15)

Op+mal  maximal  dose  

Berkkanoglu  and  Ozgur.  FerSl  Steril  2010    

•  RCT:  300  vs  450  vs  600  IU  rec-­‐FSH  

•  POR  definiSon:  AFC  <  12,  1st  IVF  cycle  

300  IU  rFSH               (n  =  38)  

450  IU  rFSH               (n  =  39)

600  IU  rFSH               (n  =  39)

P  value  

Total  oocytes   5.2  ±  0.4   6.7  ±  0.7   6.6  ±  0.7   0.21   Mature  oocytes     3.7  ±  0.4   4.9  ±  0.6   4.8  ±  0.6  

 

0.24   Embryos  

transferred  

2.3  ±  0.2   2.3  ±  0.3   2.4  ±  0.2   0.94  

Live  birth  rate   (%)

10.5 7.7 9.5 0.81  

Bologna  

criteria  

 ×  

Level  1  

ü  

(16)

Mild  s+mula+on  regimens  

•  Clomiphene  citrate  (CC)  vs  convenSonal  (Ragni  et  al.,   2012  Reprod  Biol  Endocrinol  2012)  

•  Letrozole/  150  IU  FSH/  GnRH  antagonist  vs   convenSonal  (Mohsen  et  al.,  Gynecol  Endocrinol  2013)  

•  CC/  150  IU  FSH/  GnRH  ant  vs  convenSonal  (Revelli   et  al.,  J  Assist  Reprod  Genet  2014)  

(17)

Bologna  

criteria  

 ×  

Level  1  

ü  

(18)

Bologna  

criteria  

 ×  

Level  1  

?  

•  RCT  but  no  a  priori  sample  size  calculaSon  

(19)

Bologna  

criteria  

 ×  

Level  1  

ü  

(20)
(21)
(22)
(23)

•  LH  sSmulates  producSon  of  androgens  from   theca  cells  

•  Androgens  exert  ovarian  autocrine/  paracrine   effect  

•  Androgen  receptor  mRNA  and  androgen  levels  in   follicular  fluid  correlate  with  FSH  receptor  mRNA  in   granulosa  cells  (Nielsen  et  al.,  Mol  Hum  Reprod  2011)  

•  Increase  of  FSH  receptors  in  granulosa  cells   enhances  FSH  responsiveness  and  follicle   recruitment  

(24)

DHEA  supplementa+on  

(25)

Testosterone  pre-­‐treatment  

Testosterone TRANSdermal gel for Poor Ovarian Responders Trial:

T-TRANSPORT PI:  Nikos  Polyzos  

(26)

recombinant-­‐LH  supplementa+on  

(27)

GH  supplementa+on    

•  GH  exerts  its  acSon  directly  and  mediated  through   IGF      

•  Development  of  small  antral  follicles  to  gonadotrophin-­‐

dependent  stages  

•   MaturaSon  of  oocytes  (Silva  et  al.,  Theriogenology  2009)    

Kolibianakis  et  al.,  Hum  Reprod  Update  2009  

(28)

Women  exposed  to  LE  priming  had  a  lower  risk   of  cycle  cancellaSon  RR  0.60;  95%  CI:  0.45-­‐0.78  

DiLuigi J, Engmann L, Schmidt D, Benadiva C, Nulsen J

(29)

242  low  responders  (LR),  MII  oocytes  accumulated  by  vitrifica+on  with  later  

insemina+on  vs  482  LR  pa+ents    with  standard  s+mula+on  and  fresh  insemina+on  

(30)

Prognosis  

•  Low  success  rates  in  Bologna  criteria  poor   responders  

•  Influenced  by  age  and  oocyte  number  (Sunkara  et  al.,   2011;  Oudendijk  et  al.,  Hum  Reprod  Update  2012)  

•  LBR:  7%  -­‐  10%  per  cycle  (Polyzos  et  al.,  RBMO  2014;  La  Marca  et   al.,  J  Assis  Reprod  Genet  2015;  Busnelli  et  al.,  Hum  Rep  2015)  

 

•  CumulaSve  LBR  (Ke  et  al.,  J  Huazhong  Univ  Sci  Technol  2012)  

•  Cost-­‐implicaSons:  mean  cost/  live  birth  €  87748  (Busnelli   et  al.,  Hum  Rep  2015)  

(31)

•  PredicSon,  counselling,  individualizaSon  

 

•  Bologna  criteria  

 

•  GnRH  agonist  long  and  antagonist  regimens  are   suitable  choice  for  poor  responders  

 

•  GnRH  agonist  short  “flare”  regimen  is  less   effecSve  

 

•  Unlikely  benefit  from  gonadotrophin  dose  >300   IU/  day  

Conclusion  

(32)

•  Some  evidence  to  suggest  adjuvant  testosterone,   growth  hormone  could  be  beneficial  

 

•  Robust  RCTs  needed  to  further  determine  potenSal   benefit  

 

•  How  much  can  any  intervenSon  improve  live  birth   outcome?  

•  Perhaps  the  stringent  definiSon  of  Bologna  criteria   POR  precludes  significant  benefit!      

Conclusion  

(33)

Referanslar

Benzer Belgeler

Son olarak, Türkiye’de kırsal tur- izm alanında hazırlanmış olan lisansüstü tez çalışmalarına dair; araştırma tasarımı, özet kurgusu, lisansüstü düzey, tez

In this supplement, starting from the diagnostic evaluation of severe ventricular dysfunction and new imaging methods for investigating viable tissue presence, all stages and

Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate the effect of embryo collection on the pregnancy, clinical pregnancy and live birth rates in poor responder women, as defined according

In this study, we assessed cycle characteristics in poor responders with and without successful clinical pregnancy such as age, BMI, serum FSH, estradiol, AFC, stimulation

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of elective frozen/thawed (eFET) and fresh embryo transfers (ET) on implantation rates, clinical pregnancy, and live birth outcomes

In conclusion, although there was no difference in pregnancy rates between the groups, lower gonadotropin consumption and shorter duration of ovarian stimulation in GnRH-ant

The objective of this prospective, randomized and controlled study was to demonstrate whether the amount of the high-dose Gn could be decreased with the addition of

Therefore, the aim of this prospective clinical trial was to characterize responses to anti-VEGF therapy with ranibizumab in eyes with active nvAMD, to analyze subgroups within the