• Sonuç bulunamadı

A Comparison of Traffic Flow Performance of Roundabouts and Signalized Intersections using Simulation

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "A Comparison of Traffic Flow Performance of Roundabouts and Signalized Intersections using Simulation"

Copied!
133
0
0

Yükleniyor.... (view fulltext now)

Tam metin

(1)

A Comparison of Traffic Flow Performance of

Roundabouts and Signalized Intersections

using Simulation

Mohammad AL Momani

Computer Engineering Department

Faculty of Engineering

Near East University

June 25, 2009

(2)

Overview

Introduction

Background

Methodology

Implementation

Test Results and Discussion

Conclusions and Future Work

(3)

Introduction 1/2

Traffic congestion is a reality in many countries because of

increasing number of vehicles and limited capacity of

transportation infrastructure.

Build more infrastructure and use

effective traffic

management systems

to handle traffic congestion.

Traffic simulation

has been widely used in the evaluation of

alternative

traffic management systems

.”

This thesis investigates the operational performance of

roundabouts

and

signalized intersections

using simulation.

(4)

Introduction 1/2

Traffic congestion is a reality in many countries because of

increasing number of vehicles and limited capacity of

transportation infrastructure.

Build more infrastructure and use

effective traffic

management systems

to handle traffic congestion.

Traffic simulation

has been widely used in the evaluation of

alternative

traffic management systems

.”

This thesis investigates the operational performance of

roundabouts

and

signalized intersections

using simulation.

(5)

Introduction 1/2

Traffic congestion is a reality in many countries because of

increasing number of vehicles and limited capacity of

transportation infrastructure.

Build more infrastructure and use

effective traffic

management systems

to handle traffic congestion.

Traffic simulation

has been widely used in the evaluation of

alternative

traffic management systems

.”

This thesis investigates the operational performance of

roundabouts

and

signalized intersections

using simulation.

(6)

Introduction 1/2

Traffic congestion is a reality in many countries because of

increasing number of vehicles and limited capacity of

transportation infrastructure.

Build more infrastructure and use

effective traffic

management systems

to handle traffic congestion.

Traffic simulation

has been widely used in the evaluation of

alternative

traffic management systems

.”

This thesis investigates the operational performance of

roundabouts

and

signalized intersections

using simulation.

(7)

Introduction 2/2

Design various network scenarios including 1, 2, 3, and 4

junctions with either roundabouts or signalized intersections.

Compare operational performance based on vehicle travel

time.

Experimental results show that the operational performance of

roundabouts is significantly better than signalized

intersections.

(8)

Introduction 2/2

Design various network scenarios including 1, 2, 3, and 4

junctions with either roundabouts or signalized intersections.

Compare operational performance based on vehicle travel

time.

Experimental results show that the operational performance of

roundabouts is significantly better than signalized

intersections.

(9)

Introduction 2/2

Design various network scenarios including 1, 2, 3, and 4

junctions with either roundabouts or signalized intersections.

Compare operational performance based on vehicle travel

time.

Experimental results show that the operational performance of

roundabouts is significantly better than signalized

intersections.

(10)

Contributions

This thesis contributes the following:

A hypothetical comparison of roundabouts and pre-timed

signalized intersections on traffic flow performance based on

vehicle travel time.

A basic method for optimizing split 4-phase traffic signal

timing plans.

Update to the MITSIMLab microscopic traffic simulator.

(11)

Contributions

This thesis contributes the following:

A hypothetical comparison of roundabouts and pre-timed

signalized intersections on traffic flow performance based on

vehicle travel time.

A basic method for optimizing split 4-phase traffic signal

timing plans.

Update to the MITSIMLab microscopic traffic simulator.

(12)

Contributions

This thesis contributes the following:

A hypothetical comparison of roundabouts and pre-timed

signalized intersections on traffic flow performance based on

vehicle travel time.

A basic method for optimizing split 4-phase traffic signal

timing plans.

Update to the MITSIMLab microscopic traffic simulator.

(13)

Background

Issues:

Traffic Signals & Roundabouts.

MITSIMLab.

Related Work.

(14)

Background

Issues:

Traffic Signals & Roundabouts.

MITSIMLab.

Related Work.

(15)

Background

Issues:

Traffic Signals & Roundabouts.

MITSIMLab.

Related Work.

(16)

Traffic Signals & Roundabouts

Traffic signals are devices that control traffic flow and

conflicting movements in intersections using three standard

colors: RED, YELLOW, & GREEN.

In roundabouts, traffic enters a one-way stream around a

central island, and vehicles in a roundabout have the

right-of-way.

(17)

Traffic Signals & Roundabouts

Traffic signals are devices that control traffic flow and

conflicting movements in intersections using three standard

colors: RED, YELLOW, & GREEN.

In roundabouts, traffic enters a one-way stream around a

central island, and vehicles in a roundabout have the

right-of-way.

(18)

MITSIMLab

MITSIMLab is an open-source microscopic traffic simulator.

MITSIMLab is implemented in C++ and runs on GNU/Linux

operating systems.

(19)

MITSIMLab

MITSIMLab is an open-source microscopic traffic simulator.

MITSIMLab is implemented in C++ and runs on GNU/Linux

operating systems.

(20)

MITSIMLab Components

Microscopic Traffic Simulator (MITSIM).

Traffic Management Simulator (TMS).

Graphical User Interface (GUI).

(21)

MITSIMLab Components

Microscopic Traffic Simulator (MITSIM).

Traffic Management Simulator (TMS).

Graphical User Interface (GUI).

(22)

MITSIMLab Components

Microscopic Traffic Simulator (MITSIM).

Traffic Management Simulator (TMS).

Graphical User Interface (GUI).

(23)

Graphical User Interface (GUI)

(24)

MITSIMLab Simulation Framework

MICROSCOPIC TRAFFIC TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT

SURVEILANCE SYTEM CONTROL & ROUNTING

DEVICES SYSTEM (TMS)

SIMULATOR (MITSIM)

(25)

Related Work

[Thorson et al., 2001] evaluated the performance of four-way

stops, roundabouts, and signalized intersection of a single

intersection. The evaluation is based on average time delay

and fuel consumption. The study showed roundabouts had

lowest average time delay and fuel consumption.

[Isebrands, 2009] evaluated a roundabout between two

signalized intersections. The study found that, roundabout

had less delay when the system below its capacity, while

signalized intersection had slightly less delay when the system

approached its full capacity.

[Oketch et al., 2004] studied the performance of a roundabout

and a signalized intersection, considering various roundabout

diameters. The study concluded that roundabouts improved

the operational performance at intersection.

(26)

Related Work

[Thorson et al., 2001] evaluated the performance of four-way

stops, roundabouts, and signalized intersection of a single

intersection. The evaluation is based on average time delay

and fuel consumption. The study showed roundabouts had

lowest average time delay and fuel consumption.

[Isebrands, 2009] evaluated a roundabout between two

signalized intersections. The study found that, roundabout

had less delay when the system below its capacity, while

signalized intersection had slightly less delay when the system

approached its full capacity.

[Oketch et al., 2004] studied the performance of a roundabout

and a signalized intersection, considering various roundabout

diameters. The study concluded that roundabouts improved

the operational performance at intersection.

(27)

Related Work

[Thorson et al., 2001] evaluated the performance of four-way

stops, roundabouts, and signalized intersection of a single

intersection. The evaluation is based on average time delay

and fuel consumption. The study showed roundabouts had

lowest average time delay and fuel consumption.

[Isebrands, 2009] evaluated a roundabout between two

signalized intersections. The study found that, roundabout

had less delay when the system below its capacity, while

signalized intersection had slightly less delay when the system

approached its full capacity.

[Oketch et al., 2004] studied the performance of a roundabout

and a signalized intersection, considering various roundabout

diameters. The study concluded that roundabouts improved

the operational performance at intersection.

(28)

Methodology

Issues:

Network infrastructure.

Vehicle demand.

Traffic signal optimization.

(29)

Methodology

Issues:

Network infrastructure.

Vehicle demand.

Traffic signal optimization.

(30)

Methodology

Issues:

Network infrastructure.

Vehicle demand.

Traffic signal optimization.

(31)

Network Infrastructure / 1 Junction

An Intersection

A Roundabout

(32)

Network Infrastructure / 2 Junctions

2 Intersections

2 Roundabouts

(33)

Network Infrastructure / 3 Junctions

3 Intersections

3 Roundabouts

(34)

Network Infrastructure / 4 Junctions

4 Intersections

4 Roundabouts

(35)

Vehicle Demand

Identical vehicle demand on each compatible network.

Identical vehicle demand at source nodes and equal

distribution over all destination nodes.

U-turns are disallowed.

Simulator generates vehicles using fixed-seed randomization

=⇒ Identical vehicle IDs, types, driver types, ODs, and

departure times.

(36)

Vehicle Demand

Identical vehicle demand on each compatible network.

Identical vehicle demand at source nodes and equal

distribution over all destination nodes.

U-turns are disallowed.

Simulator generates vehicles using fixed-seed randomization

=⇒ Identical vehicle IDs, types, driver types, ODs, and

departure times.

(37)

Vehicle Demand

Identical vehicle demand on each compatible network.

Identical vehicle demand at source nodes and equal

distribution over all destination nodes.

U-turns are disallowed.

Simulator generates vehicles using fixed-seed randomization

=⇒ Identical vehicle IDs, types, driver types, ODs, and

departure times.

(38)

Vehicle Demand

Identical vehicle demand on each compatible network.

Identical vehicle demand at source nodes and equal

distribution over all destination nodes.

U-turns are disallowed.

Simulator generates vehicles using fixed-seed randomization

=⇒ Identical vehicle IDs, types, driver types, ODs, and

departure times.

(39)

2-Phase Traffic Signals / Phase 1

: Stop : Proceed

(40)

2-Phase Traffic Signal / Phase 2

: Stop : Proceed

(41)

2-Phase Traffic Signal Conflict Movement

: Green TS : Vehicle

(42)

2-Phase Traffic Signal Conflict Movement

: Green TS : Vehicle : Conflict Vehicle

(43)

2-Phase Traffic Signal Conflict Movement

: Green TS : Vehicle : Conflict Vehicle

Crossing conflict

(44)

4-Phase Traffic Signal / Phase 1

: Stop : Proceed

(45)

4-Phase Traffic Signal / Phase 2

: Stop : Proceed

(46)

4-Phase Traffic Signal / Phase 3

: Stop : Proceed

(47)

4-Phase Traffic Signal / Phase 4

: Stop : Proceed

(48)

Lane-specific & Link-specific Traffic Signals

Lane-specific traffic signal

Link-specific traffic signal

(49)

Lane-specific & Link-specific Traffic Signals

Lane-specific traffic signal

Link-specific traffic signal

(50)

Split 4-Phase Traffic Signal / Phase 1

: Stop : Proceed

(51)

Split 4-Phase Traffic Signal / Phase 2

: Stop : Proceed

(52)

Split 4-Phase Traffic Signal / Phase 3

: Stop : Proceed

(53)

Split 4-Phase Traffic Signal / Phase 4

: Stop : Proceed

(54)

Split 4-Phase Traffic Signal Movement

: Green TS : Vehicle : Conflict Vehicle

(55)

Non-optimized Traffic Signal

: Entry Node : Exit Node : Link : Traffic signal Y W Z X C D A B TS#3 TS#2 TS#1 TS TS #1 TS #2 TS #3 TP : Left TS : Top TS : Rigth TS : Bottom TS : Green Status : Red Status t t t t

(56)

Non-optimized Traffic Signal

: Entry Node : Exit Node : Link : Traffic signal Y W Z X C D A B TS#3 TS#2 TS#1 TS TS #1 TS #2 TS #3 TP : Left TS : Top TS : Rigth TS : Bottom TS : Green Status : Red Status t t t t

(57)

Non-optimized Traffic Signal

: Entry Node : Exit Node : Link : Traffic signal Y W Z X C D A B TS#3 TS#2 TS#1 TS TS #1 TS #2 TS #3 TP : Left TS : Top TS : Rigth TS : Bottom TS : Green Status : Red Status t t t t

(58)

Non-optimized Traffic Signal

: Entry Node : Exit Node : Link : Traffic signal Y W Z X C D A B TS#3 TS#2 TS#1 TS TS #1 TS #2 TS #3 TP : Left TS : Top TS : Rigth TS : Bottom TS : Green Status : Red Status t t t t

(59)

Non-optimized Traffic Signal

: Entry Node : Exit Node : Link : Traffic signal Y W Z X C D A B TS#3 TS#2 TS#1 TS TS #1 TS #2 TS #3 TP : Left TS : Top TS : Rigth TS : Bottom TS : Green Status : Red Status t t t t

(60)

Traffic Signal Optimization 1/2

: Entry Node : Exit Node : Link : Traffic signal Y 1 1 W Z X C D A B 1 1 TS#3 TS#2 1 TS#1 1 1 1

(61)

Traffic Signal Optimization 1/2

: Entry Node : Exit Node : Link : Traffic signal Y 1 1 1 W Z X 1 C D A B 1 1 TS#3 TS#2 1 TS#1 1 R

(62)

Traffic Signal Optimization 1/2

: Entry Node : Exit Node : Link : Traffic signal Y 1 1 1 W Z X 1 C D A B 1 1 TS#3 TS#2 1 TS#1 1 __ _ 7 7 7 5+5+5= 2.14 R

(63)

Traffic Signal Optimization 1/2

: Entry Node : Exit Node : Link : Traffic signal Y 1 1 1 W Z X 1 C D A B 1 1 TS#3 TS#2 2.14 1 TS#1 1 __ _ 7 7 7 5+5+5= 2.14 R

(64)

Traffic Signal Optimization 1/2

: Entry Node : Exit Node : Link : Traffic signal Y 1 1 1 W Z X 1 C D A B 1 1 TS#3 TS#2 2.14 1 TS#1 1 __ _ 7 7 7 5+5+5= 2.14 R

(65)

Traffic Signal Optimization 1/2

: Entry Node : Exit Node : Link : Traffic signal Y 3+3+1.29= 2.14 1 1 1 W Z X 1 C D A B 1 1 TS#3 TS#2 2.14 1 _ _ 7 7 TS#1 1 __ _ 7 7 7 7 7 7 3+3+3= 1.29 _ _ _ 5+5+5= 2.14 R

(66)

Traffic Signal Optimization 1/2

: Entry Node : Exit Node : Link : Traffic signal Y 3+3+1.29= 2.14 1 1 1 W Z X 1 C D A B 1 1 TS#3 2.14 TS#2 2.14 1 _ _ 7 7 TS#1 1 __ _ 7 7 7 7 7 7 3+3+3= 1.29 _ _ _ 5+5+5= 2.14 R

(67)

Traffic Signal Optimization 1/2

: Entry Node : Exit Node : Link : Traffic signal Y 3+3+1.29= 2.14 2.14 1 1 1 W Z X 1 2.14 C D A B 1 1 TS#3 2.14 TS#2 2.14 1 _ _ 7 7 TS#1 1 __ _ 7 7 7 7 7 7 3+3+3= 1.29 _ _ _ 5+5+5= 2.14 R

(68)

Traffic Signal Optimization 2/2

: Entry Node : Exit Node : Link : Traffic signal Y 2.14 1 1 1 W Z X 1 2.14 C D A B 1 1 TS#3 2.14 TS#2 2.14 1 TS#1 1 R TS TS #1 TS #2 TS #3 1t 1t 1t 0.14t 2t 1t TP 0.14t : Left TS : Top TS : Rigth TS : Bottom TS : Green Status : Red Status

(69)

Traffic Signal Optimization 2/2

: Entry Node : Exit Node : Link : Traffic signal Y 2.14 1 1 1 W Z X 1 2.14 C D A B 1 1 TS#3 2.14 TS#2 2.14 1 TS#1 1 R TS TS #1 TS #2 TS #3 1t 1t 1t 0.14t 2t 1t TP 0.14t : Left TS : Top TS : Rigth TS : Bottom TS : Green Status : Red Status

(70)

Traffic Signal Optimization 2/2

: Entry Node : Exit Node : Link : Traffic signal Y 2.14 1 1 1 W Z X 1 2.14 C D A B 1 1 TS#3 2.14 TS#2 2.14 1 TS#1 1 R TS TS #1 TS #2 TS #3 1t 1t 1t 0.14t 2t 1t TP 0.14t : Left TS : Top TS : Rigth TS : Bottom TS : Green Status : Red Status

(71)

Traffic Signal Optimization 2/2

: Entry Node : Exit Node : Link : Traffic signal Y 2.14 1 1 1 W Z X 1 2.14 C D A B 1 1 TS#3 2.14 TS#2 2.14 1 TS#1 1 R TS TS #1 TS #2 TS #3 1t 1t 1t 0.14t 2t 1t TP 0.14t : Left TS : Top TS : Rigth TS : Bottom TS : Green Status : Red Status

(72)

Traffic Signal Optimization 2/2

: Entry Node : Exit Node : Link : Traffic signal Y 2.14 1 1 1 W Z X 1 2.14 C D A B 1 1 TS#3 2.14 TS#2 2.14 1 TS#1 1 R TS TS #1 TS #2 TS #3 1t 1t 1t 0.14t 2t 1t TP 0.14t : Left TS : Top TS : Rigth TS : Bottom TS : Green Status : Red Status

(73)

Traffic Signal Optimization 2/2

: Entry Node : Exit Node : Link : Traffic signal Y 2.14 1 1 1 W Z X 1 2.14 C D A B 1 1 TS#3 2.14 TS#2 2.14 1 TS#1 1 R TS TS #1 TS #2 TS #3 1t 1t 1t 0.14t 2t 1t TP 0.14t : Left TS : Top TS : Rigth TS : Bottom TS : Green Status : Red Status

(74)

Traffic Signal Optimization 2/2

: Entry Node : Exit Node : Link : Traffic signal Y 2.14 1 1 1 W Z X 1 2.14 C D A B 1 1 TS#3 2.14 TS#2 2.14 1 TS#1 1 R TS TS #1 TS #2 TS #3 1t 1t 1t 0.14t 2t 1t TP 0.14t : Left TS : Top TS : Rigth TS : Bottom TS : Green Status : Red Status

(75)

Traffic Signal Optimization 2/2

: Entry Node : Exit Node : Link : Traffic signal Y 2.14 1 1 1 W Z X 1 2.14 C D A B 1 1 TS#3 2.14 TS#2 2.14 1 TS#1 1 R TS TS #1 TS #2 TS #3 1t 1t 1t 0.14t 2t 1t TP 0.14t : Left TS : Top TS : Rigth TS : Bottom TS : Green Status : Red Status

(76)

Traffic Signal Optimization 2/2

: Entry Node : Exit Node : Link : Traffic signal Demand Extra Demand Extra Y 0.57 0.57 2.14 1 1 1 W Z X 1 2.14 C 0.57 0.57 D A B 1 1 TS#3 2.14 TS#2 2.14 1 TS#1 1 R TS TS #1 TS #2 TS #3 1t 1t 1t 0.14t 2t 1t TP 0.14t : Left TS : Top TS : Rigth TS : Bottom TS : Green Status : Red Status

(77)

Implementation

Issues:

Implementation of roundabouts and signalized intersections.

Implementation of roundabout right-of-way rules.

Roundabout speed limits and geometrical design.

Updating MITSIMLab.

Automation of experiment generation and data analysis.

(78)

Implementation

Issues:

Implementation of roundabouts and signalized intersections.

Implementation of roundabout right-of-way rules.

Roundabout speed limits and geometrical design.

Updating MITSIMLab.

Automation of experiment generation and data analysis.

(79)

Implementation

Issues:

Implementation of roundabouts and signalized intersections.

Implementation of roundabout right-of-way rules.

Roundabout speed limits and geometrical design.

Updating MITSIMLab.

Automation of experiment generation and data analysis.

(80)

Implementation

Issues:

Implementation of roundabouts and signalized intersections.

Implementation of roundabout right-of-way rules.

Roundabout speed limits and geometrical design.

Updating MITSIMLab.

Automation of experiment generation and data analysis.

(81)

Implementation

Issues:

Implementation of roundabouts and signalized intersections.

Implementation of roundabout right-of-way rules.

Roundabout speed limits and geometrical design.

Updating MITSIMLab.

Automation of experiment generation and data analysis.

(82)

Implementation of Roundabouts & Signalized

Intersections

5 7 3 4 1 {7,8} 2 {3,4} 37 {73,74} 39 6 8 38 40 {1,2} {5,6} 41 {81,82} 42 {83,84} 83 84 {167,168} {77,80} {75,76} {15,16} {13,14} {9,10} {165,166} {105,106} {97,98} 49 53 48 {93,94} 47 {79,80} {11,12} {95,96} {107,108} 54 51 {101,102} 52{103,104} {99,100} 50

: {LLane ID,RLane ID} {X,Y} Z: Link ID : Signalized Node : Node : Link 5 3 4 1 {7,8} 2 {3,4} 37 39 38 40 {1,2} {5,6} 41 {81,82} 42 {83,84} 83 {165,166} 84 {167,168} {9,10} {73,74} {77,80} {75,76} {79,80} 8 {15,16} {11,12}6 7 {13,14} 5 7 39 37 8 6 40 38 2 1 3 4 85 86 88 87 5 7 39 8 6 41 40 38 2 1 3 4 85 86 87 88 37 47 48 46 45 52 51 50 49

(83)

Roundabout Implementation

Link type.

Parameters related to nosing, yielding, and headway variance.

(84)

Roundabout Implementation

Link type.

Parameters related to nosing, yielding, and headway variance.

(85)

Roundabout Speed Limits and Geometrical Design

d

R

d

S

Parameter Value

d

R

180 ft

dS

20 ft

#lanes

2

Speed

limits

25–30

mph

(86)

Updating MITSIMLab

Update MITSIMLab source code in order to build the

executables on latest GNU/Linux systems (openSUSE 11.1).

Released the modified MITSIMLab source code to MIT Civil

Engineering Department researchers, who rebuilt MITSIMLab

on Ubuntu 8.04 GNU/Linux operating system.

(87)

Updating MITSIMLab

Update MITSIMLab source code in order to build the

executables on latest GNU/Linux systems (openSUSE 11.1).

Released the modified MITSIMLab source code to MIT Civil

Engineering Department researchers, who rebuilt MITSIMLab

on Ubuntu 8.04 GNU/Linux operating system.

(88)

Automation of Experiment Generation and Result

Analysis

Two Bash shell scripts that generate roundabout and

signalized intersection experiments within a given vehicle

demand range and green phase range.

A Bash shell script that runs all experiments within a given

vehicle demand range (or all tests for that matter).

Several other Bash shell scripts and AWK scripts that

automate the collection of data from all experiment directories

and generation of GNU Octave code for statistical analysis.

(89)

Automation of Experiment Generation and Result

Analysis

Two Bash shell scripts that generate roundabout and

signalized intersection experiments within a given vehicle

demand range and green phase range.

A Bash shell script that runs all experiments within a given

vehicle demand range (or all tests for that matter).

Several other Bash shell scripts and AWK scripts that

automate the collection of data from all experiment directories

and generation of GNU Octave code for statistical analysis.

(90)

Automation of Experiment Generation and Result

Analysis

Two Bash shell scripts that generate roundabout and

signalized intersection experiments within a given vehicle

demand range and green phase range.

A Bash shell script that runs all experiments within a given

vehicle demand range (or all tests for that matter).

Several other Bash shell scripts and AWK scripts that

automate the collection of data from all experiment directories

and generation of GNU Octave code for statistical analysis.

(91)

Results and Discussion

Highlights:

Best green phase time.

Statistical one-to-one comparison of individual vehicle travel

times.

Statistical comparison of average vehicle travel times.

Total number of completed trips.

(92)

Results and Discussion

Highlights:

Best green phase time.

Statistical one-to-one comparison of individual vehicle travel

times.

Statistical comparison of average vehicle travel times.

Total number of completed trips.

(93)

Results and Discussion

Highlights:

Best green phase time.

Statistical one-to-one comparison of individual vehicle travel

times.

Statistical comparison of average vehicle travel times.

Total number of completed trips.

(94)

Results and Discussion

Highlights:

Best green phase time.

Statistical one-to-one comparison of individual vehicle travel

times.

Statistical comparison of average vehicle travel times.

Total number of completed trips.

(95)

Optimized and Non-optimized Best Green Phase

Time

1 Intersection

vd

Non-optimized

Average Travel Time

Optimized

Average Travel Time

0050

132.15

132.43

0100

133.97

133.64

0150

138.71

137.34

0200

141.74

142.84

0250

150.47

154.41

0300

204.27

204.64

0350

256.71

257.59

0400

312.67

307.69

0450

359.77

349.06

(96)

Optimized and Non-optimized Best Green Phase

Time

2 Intersections

vd

Non-optimized

Average Travel Time

Optimized

Average Travel Time

0050

181.66

185.84

0100

238.24

294.01

0150

348.50

407.55

0200

447.07

471.80

0250

511.83

530.88

0300

564.47

582.91

0350

603.80

617.69

0400

644.62

648.32

0450

672.41

676.44

(97)

Optimized and Non-optimized Best Green Phase

Time

2 Intersections

vd

Non-optimized

Average Travel Time

Optimized

Average Travel Time

0050

181.66

185.84

0100

238.24

294.01

0150

348.50

407.55

0200

447.07

471.80

0250

511.83

530.88

0300

564.47

582.91

0350

603.80

617.69

0400

644.62

648.32

0450

672.41

676.44

(98)

Optimized and Non-optimized Best Green Phase

Time

3 Intersections

vd

Non-optimized

Average Travel Time

Optimized

Average Travel Time

0050

238.47

249.08

0100

437.65

414.49

0150

565.41

531.07

0200

651.55

616.86

0250

688.27

680.64

0300

744.56

721.11

0350

769.20

751.27

0400

792.35

779.72

0450

816.44

797.19

(99)

Optimized and Non-optimized Best Green Phase

Time

4 Intersections

vd

Non-optimized

Average Travel Time

Optimized

Average Travel Time

0050

398.54

382.44

0100

622.37

601.67

0150

719.45

691.33

0200

780.01

765.45

0250

813.53

794.33

0300

853.24

842.16

0350

868.97

859.32

0400

884.41

885.94

0450

898.46

880.70

(100)

Statistical Comparison of Optimized &

Non-optimized Traffic signal

Two-tailed t-test results

1 Intersection

2 Intersections

3 Intersections

4 Intersections

-95%

+99%

+99%

(101)

Best Green Phase Time

1 Intersection

vd (#vehicles/hr)

Green Phase Time (sec)

0050

010

0100

010

0150

010

0200

010

0250

010

0300

030

0350

060

0400

050

0450

060

(102)

Best Green Phase Time

2 Intersections

vd (#vehicles/hr)

Green Phase Time (sec)

0050

010

0100

020

0150

010

0200

020

0250

020

0300

030

0350

040

0400

060

0450

040

(103)

Best Green Phase Time

3 Intersections

vd (#vehicles/hr)

Green Phase Time (sec)

0050

010

0100

010

0150

010

0200

020

0250

020

0300

010

0350

020

0400

020

0450

100

(104)

Best Green Phase Time

4 Intersections

vd (#vehicles/hr)

Green Phase Time (sec)

0050

010

0100

010

0150

010

0200

010

0250

010

0300

020

0350

030

0400

010

0450

030

(105)

Statistical Comparison of Individual Vehicle Travel

Times

Two-tailed t-test results

vd

1 Roundabout

vs

1 Intersection

2 Roundabouts

vs

2 Intersections

3 Roundabouts

vs

3 Intersections

4 Roundabouts

vs

4 Intersections

050

+99%

+99%

+99%

+99%

100

+99%

+99%

+99%

+99%

150

+99%

+99%

+99%

+99%

200

+99%

+99%

+99%

+99%

250

+99%

+99%

+99%

+99%

300

+99%

+99%

+99%

+99%

350

+99%

+99%

+99%

+99%

400

+99%

+99%

+99%

+99%

450

+99%

+99%

+99%

+99%

(106)

Statistical Comparison of Average Vehicle Travel

Times

Two-tailed t-test results

1 Roundabout

vs

1 Intersection

2 Roundabouts

vs

2 Intersections

3 Roundabouts

vs

3 Intersections

4 Roundabouts

vs

4 Intersections

+95%

+99%

+99%

+99%

(107)

Average Vehicle Travel Times

200 300 400 500 600 700 800 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450

Average vehicle travel time (sec)

Vehicle demand, vd (#vehicles/hr)

Average Vehicle Travel Times for Intersection & Roundabout Networks

1 Intersection 1 Roundabout 2 Intersections 2 Roundabouts 3 Intersections 3 Roundabouts 4 Intersections 4 Roundabouts

(108)

Total Number of Completed Trips

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 #Completed trips

Vehicle demand (#vehicles/hr) 1 Intersection vs 1 Roundabout Intersection Roundabout 1.02 1.01 1.00 1.01 1.02 1.05 1.10 1.18 1.24 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 #Completed trips

Vehicle demand (#vehicles/hr) 2 Intersections vs 2 Roundabouts Intersection Roundabout 1.01 1.14 1.36 1.51 1.83 2.16 2.48 2.75 2.76 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 #Completed trips

Vehicle demand (#vehicles/hr) 3 Intersections vs 3 Roundabouts Intersection Roundabout 1.08 1.41 1.80 2.14 2.31 2.34 2.31 2.41 2.90 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 #Completed trips

Vehicle demand (#vehicles/hr) 4 Intersections vs 4 Roundabouts Intersection Roundabout 1.24 1.84 2.27 2.25 2.21 2.22 2.36 2.38 2.43

(109)

Conclusions

One-to-one comparison of vehicle travel times

Roundabouts are always better than pre-timed signalized

intersections for all networks and traffic volumes with a

statistical confidence of

99%

.

Comparison of average travel times

Roundabouts outperform signalized intersections with a

statistical confidence of

99%

in 2-, 3- and 4-junction networks.

Single roundabout performed better than a signalized

intersection with a statistical confidence of

95%

.

Total number of completed trips

#Completed trips in roundabout networks is always higher

than that in signalized intersection networks.

A roundabout network can carry almost 3 times as much

traffic as an intersection network (3-junction case).

(110)

Conclusions

One-to-one comparison of vehicle travel times

Roundabouts are always better than pre-timed signalized

intersections for all networks and traffic volumes with a

statistical confidence of

99%

.

Comparison of average travel times

Roundabouts outperform signalized intersections with a

statistical confidence of

99%

in 2-, 3- and 4-junction networks.

Single roundabout performed better than a signalized

intersection with a statistical confidence of

95%

.

Total number of completed trips

#Completed trips in roundabout networks is always higher

than that in signalized intersection networks.

A roundabout network can carry almost 3 times as much

traffic as an intersection network (3-junction case).

(111)

Conclusions

One-to-one comparison of vehicle travel times

Roundabouts are always better than pre-timed signalized

intersections for all networks and traffic volumes with a

statistical confidence of

99%

.

Comparison of average travel times

Roundabouts outperform signalized intersections with a

statistical confidence of

99%

in 2-, 3- and 4-junction networks.

Single roundabout performed better than a signalized

intersection with a statistical confidence of

95%

.

Total number of completed trips

#Completed trips in roundabout networks is always higher

than that in signalized intersection networks.

A roundabout network can carry almost 3 times as much

traffic as an intersection network (3-junction case).

(112)

Conclusions

One-to-one comparison of vehicle travel times

Roundabouts are always better than pre-timed signalized

intersections for all networks and traffic volumes with a

statistical confidence of

99%

.

Comparison of average travel times

Roundabouts outperform signalized intersections with a

statistical confidence of

99%

in 2-, 3- and 4-junction networks.

Single roundabout performed better than a signalized

intersection with a statistical confidence of

95%

.

Total number of completed trips

#Completed trips in roundabout networks is always higher

than that in signalized intersection networks.

A roundabout network can carry almost 3 times as much

traffic as an intersection network (3-junction case).

(113)

Conclusions

One-to-one comparison of vehicle travel times

Roundabouts are always better than pre-timed signalized

intersections for all networks and traffic volumes with a

statistical confidence of

99%

.

Comparison of average travel times

Roundabouts outperform signalized intersections with a

statistical confidence of

99%

in 2-, 3- and 4-junction networks.

Single roundabout performed better than a signalized

intersection with a statistical confidence of

95%

.

Total number of completed trips

#Completed trips in roundabout networks is always higher

than that in signalized intersection networks.

A roundabout network can carry almost 3 times as much

traffic as an intersection network (3-junction case).

(114)

Conclusions

One-to-one comparison of vehicle travel times

Roundabouts are always better than pre-timed signalized

intersections for all networks and traffic volumes with a

statistical confidence of

99%

.

Comparison of average travel times

Roundabouts outperform signalized intersections with a

statistical confidence of

99%

in 2-, 3- and 4-junction networks.

Single roundabout performed better than a signalized

intersection with a statistical confidence of

95%

.

Total number of completed trips

#Completed trips in roundabout networks is always higher

than that in signalized intersection networks.

A roundabout network can carry almost 3 times as much

traffic as an intersection network (3-junction case).

(115)

Conclusions

One-to-one comparison of vehicle travel times

Roundabouts are always better than pre-timed signalized

intersections for all networks and traffic volumes with a

statistical confidence of

99%

.

Comparison of average travel times

Roundabouts outperform signalized intersections with a

statistical confidence of

99%

in 2-, 3- and 4-junction networks.

Single roundabout performed better than a signalized

intersection with a statistical confidence of

95%

.

Total number of completed trips

#Completed trips in roundabout networks is always higher

than that in signalized intersection networks.

A roundabout network can carry almost 3 times as much

traffic as an intersection network (3-junction case).

(116)

Conclusions

One-to-one comparison of vehicle travel times

Roundabouts are always better than pre-timed signalized

intersections for all networks and traffic volumes with a

statistical confidence of

99%

.

Comparison of average travel times

Roundabouts outperform signalized intersections with a

statistical confidence of

99%

in 2-, 3- and 4-junction networks.

Single roundabout performed better than a signalized

intersection with a statistical confidence of

95%

.

Total number of completed trips

#Completed trips in roundabout networks is always higher

than that in signalized intersection networks.

A roundabout network can carry almost 3 times as much

traffic as an intersection network (3-junction case).

(117)

Future Work 1/2

Study realistic traffic networks with real data about traffic

volumes and traffic conditions.

Study a mixture of networks including both roundabouts and

signalized intersections within the same traffic stream.

Modify MITSIMLab to provide explicit high-level right-of-way

rules and lane-specific traffic signals.

Modify MITSIMLab to implement Message Passing Interface

(MPI) instead of using Parallel Virtual Machine (PVM).

Study the impact of vehicle dimensions on the operational

performance of roundabouts and signalized intersections.

(118)

Future Work 1/2

Study realistic traffic networks with real data about traffic

volumes and traffic conditions.

Study a mixture of networks including both roundabouts and

signalized intersections within the same traffic stream.

Modify MITSIMLab to provide explicit high-level right-of-way

rules and lane-specific traffic signals.

Modify MITSIMLab to implement Message Passing Interface

(MPI) instead of using Parallel Virtual Machine (PVM).

Study the impact of vehicle dimensions on the operational

performance of roundabouts and signalized intersections.

(119)

Future Work 1/2

Study realistic traffic networks with real data about traffic

volumes and traffic conditions.

Study a mixture of networks including both roundabouts and

signalized intersections within the same traffic stream.

Modify MITSIMLab to provide explicit high-level right-of-way

rules and lane-specific traffic signals.

Modify MITSIMLab to implement Message Passing Interface

(MPI) instead of using Parallel Virtual Machine (PVM).

Study the impact of vehicle dimensions on the operational

performance of roundabouts and signalized intersections.

(120)

Future Work 1/2

Study realistic traffic networks with real data about traffic

volumes and traffic conditions.

Study a mixture of networks including both roundabouts and

signalized intersections within the same traffic stream.

Modify MITSIMLab to provide explicit high-level right-of-way

rules and lane-specific traffic signals.

Modify MITSIMLab to implement Message Passing Interface

(MPI) instead of using Parallel Virtual Machine (PVM).

Study the impact of vehicle dimensions on the operational

performance of roundabouts and signalized intersections.

(121)

Future Work 1/2

Study realistic traffic networks with real data about traffic

volumes and traffic conditions.

Study a mixture of networks including both roundabouts and

signalized intersections within the same traffic stream.

Modify MITSIMLab to provide explicit high-level right-of-way

rules and lane-specific traffic signals.

Modify MITSIMLab to implement Message Passing Interface

(MPI) instead of using Parallel Virtual Machine (PVM).

Study the impact of vehicle dimensions on the operational

performance of roundabouts and signalized intersections.

(122)

Future Work 2/2

Study the impact of roundabouts and signalized intersections

on fuel consumption.

Study the impact of roundabouts and adaptive traffic signals

on traffic flow performance.

Study the impact of accidents in roundabouts and signalized

intersections.

Study the impact of roundabout dimensions on traffic flow

performance.

(123)

Future Work 2/2

Study the impact of roundabouts and signalized intersections

on fuel consumption.

Study the impact of roundabouts and adaptive traffic signals

on traffic flow performance.

Study the impact of accidents in roundabouts and signalized

intersections.

Study the impact of roundabout dimensions on traffic flow

performance.

(124)

Future Work 2/2

Study the impact of roundabouts and signalized intersections

on fuel consumption.

Study the impact of roundabouts and adaptive traffic signals

on traffic flow performance.

Study the impact of accidents in roundabouts and signalized

intersections.

Study the impact of roundabout dimensions on traffic flow

performance.

(125)

Future Work 2/2

Study the impact of roundabouts and signalized intersections

on fuel consumption.

Study the impact of roundabouts and adaptive traffic signals

on traffic flow performance.

Study the impact of accidents in roundabouts and signalized

intersections.

Study the impact of roundabout dimensions on traffic flow

performance.

(126)

References

Hillary N. Isebrands. Roundabouts and signals: Harmony even with

increasing traffic volumes. Institute of Transportation Engineers

(ITE), February 2009.

Timothy Oketch, Mike Delsey, and Doug Robertson. Evaluation of

performance of modern roundabouts using paramics

micro-simulation model. In Proceeding of the Fifth Annual

Trading Agent Competition, September 2004.

Scott L. Thorson, Donald D. Campbell, and Perry D. Gross.

Comparison of roundabout operations to four way stop and

signal controlled intersections using netsim simulations.

Technical Report NDOT Research Report RDT01-008, Nevada

Department of Transportation (NDOT), May 2001.

(127)

END

(128)

MITSIMLab Evaluation Framework

PERFORMANCE MEASURES GOALS & OBJECTIVES

SCENARIOS DESIGN CONTROL &

ROUTING STRATEGIES MITSIMLab

(129)

Vehicle Demand 2/2

Z X W D Y C A B Z X W D Y C A B

(130)

Statistical Analysis

Best green time periods.

Statistical comparison of individual vehicle travel times.

Statistical comparison of average vehicle travel times.

Total number of completed trips.

(131)

Statistical Analysis

Best green time periods.

Statistical comparison of individual vehicle travel times.

Statistical comparison of average vehicle travel times.

Total number of completed trips.

(132)

Statistical Analysis

Best green time periods.

Statistical comparison of individual vehicle travel times.

Statistical comparison of average vehicle travel times.

Total number of completed trips.

(133)

Statistical Analysis

Best green time periods.

Statistical comparison of individual vehicle travel times.

Statistical comparison of average vehicle travel times.

Total number of completed trips.

Referanslar

Benzer Belgeler

The data collected from the traffic volume counts, the average headway of the vehicles, the saturation flow rate and the geometry factors of the intersection

Anterior fi.izyon genelde faset kmgmm e~lik ettigi ve posterior ligamantoz yaralanmanm daha az oldugu unilateral faset kilitlenmesinde onerilir. Bu seride kapah redi.iksiyon

[r]

İlköğretim öğretmenlerinin sicil amirinin okul müdürü, milli eğitim müdürü olması normal ama aslında sicil notlarının verilmesinde o öğretmenin dersine

hanfendinin ahiret karde­ şi Ziba hanım; Cemile Sultan saraylılarından Dilâviz hanım; kul cinsi, Salkımsöğüt tekkesin­ de mukim Feryal hanım; ak­ rabadan

As shown in the figure,the proposed model gen- erally estimated overflow delays very close to that estimated by the Canadian and the HCM 2000 delay models for both undersaturated

As can be seen from column% d-h0 except on opening height equal to two centimeters, percentage changes are generally h dense flow does not change by changing the initial

Akış etkenliği ve duyulur ısıl etkenliği yüksek olacak şekilde tasarlanan levhalı ısı değiştiricilerin; alt kanal sayısı, kanal yüksekliği, ortalama