• Sonuç bulunamadı

Editorial commentary: Anatomic or not, the tunnel will get wider!

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Editorial commentary: Anatomic or not, the tunnel will get wider!"

Copied!
2
0
0

Yükleniyor.... (view fulltext now)

Tam metin

(1)

Editorial Commentary: Anatomic or Not, the Tunnel

Will Get Wider!

Musa U

gur Mermerkaya, M.D., Kadir Büyükdogan, M.D., Ömer Serdar Hakyemez, M.D.,

Murat Birinci, M.D., and Cem Cos¸kun Avcı, M.D.

Abstract: In our experience, arthroscopic tunnel widening is one of the major complications after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Even though this complication doesn’t require an acute correction or intervention, pa-tients with failed ACL reconstruction along with tunnel widening may need a 2-stage revision in which we have tofill the gap in the tunnelsfirst. Otherwise, this tunnel widening after ACL reconstruction doesn’t affect the clinical outcomes of the primary surgery and it won’t affect the success of the surgery in the aspects of clinical and functional outcomes.

See related article on page

1105

A

nterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is

one of the surgical procedures for functional anteroposterior instability of the knee that happens after ACL tear. This procedure has its own complica-tions, but one of the most important is tibial and femoral bone tunnel widening. This complication is not that much related to surgical technique; instead, the fixation devices used in the surgery, such as metal screws, biodegradable screws, or endobutton, affect the rate of tunnel widening.1-4Even though this is a com-mon complication of this surgery, it has been shown in various studies that tunnel widening, regardless of the surgical technique used in the surgery, does not affect the clinical outcomes after the surgery.5-9

Several studies have been performed on this topic. In 1999, Clatworthy et al.9 researched the effect of graft selection on the tunnel widening. In their study, they

compared hamstring tendon autograft and

boneepatellar tendonebone (BPTB) autograft for ACL reconstruction and the effect of this selection on the tunnel widening. They found that using hamstring tendons as an autograft for ACL reconstruction resulted in statistically significantly more tunnel widening that

BPTB patellar tendon autograft. In this study, they also found out that tunnel widening after ACL reconstruc-tion doesn’t cause instability and is not related to poorer functional and clinical outcomes after the surgery. In their study in 2018, DeFroda et al.7 investigated the effect of graft tensioning on the tunnel widening ACL reconstruction along with graft selection. Similar to the previous study, they found that using hamstring ten-dons as an autograft for ACL reconstruction resulted in more tunnel widening than BPTB autograft. In this study, they also found that the initial graft tensioning whilefixing the graft in the operation doesn’t affect the tunnel widening after the surgery.

An area of investigation for possible causes of tunnel

widening is graft fixation methods during the

operation. Mayr et al.6 investigated the effect of tibal tunnel’s fixation method on the tunnel widening. They

compared interference screw fixation with adjustable

loop endobuttuonfixation and they found that using an

interference screw for graftfixation resulted in greater

tunnel widening than fixation with endobutton. A

similar study was performed by Mermerkaya et al.10for

the femoral tunnel fixation. The authors compared

biodegradable interference screw with endobutton in

femoral tunnel fixation. The results were similar with

the study that was performed by Mayr et al.6 Femoral

tunnel widening was greater after fixation had been

performed with biodegradable interference screws. A study on interference screws that was performed by Lind et al.8has shown that using a hydroxiapatite/ polylactate interference screw for graftfixation causes less tunnel widening than using a metal screw. Medipol University (M.U.M, O.S.H., M.B., C.C.A.); and Koç University

(K.B.)

The authors report no conflicts of interest in the authorship and publication of this article. Full ICMJE author disclosure forms are available for this article online, assupplementary material.

Ó 2020 by the Arthroscopy Association of North America 0749-8063/20115/$36.00

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2020.01.031

1112

Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, Vol 36, No 4 (April), 2020: pp 1112-1113

Downloaded for Anonymous User (n/a) at Istanbul Medipol University from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on August 04, 2020. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2020. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

(2)

In 2010 Marchant et al.11 provided the information that computed tomography has the best intra- and interobserver reliability for evaluating the bone tunnels compared with radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging. In the light of this information, using computed tomography for tunnel widening after ACL reconstruction would be the wisest option.

In their study “Comparison of Postoperative Tunnel

Widening After Hamstring Anterior Cruciate Liga-ment Reconstructions Between Anatomic and Non-anatomic Femoral Tunnels,” Choi, Lee, Park, and Victoroff12 studied the effect of femoral tunnel

posi-tioning on femoral tunnel widening after ACL

reconstruction. They found that using

nonanatomic-placed tunnels doesn’t have a significant effect on

either tunnel widening or clinical outcomes after ACL reconstruction. Based on this information, it is safe to say if we have a failed tunnel placement during the ACL reconstruction, that won’t result in a greater tunnel widening.

References

1.Clatworthy MG, Bartelett J, Howell S, et al. The effect of graftfixation techniques on tunnel widening in hamstring ACL reconstruction. Arthroscopy 1999;15:5 (suppl). 2.Foldager C, Jakobsen BW, Lund B, et al. Tibial tunnel

widening after bioresorbable poly-lactide calcium car-bonate interference screw usage in ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2010;18:79-84. 3.Hersekli MA, Akpinar S, Ozalay M, et al. Tunnel

enlargement after arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Comparison of bone-patellar tendon-bone and hamstring autografts. Adv Ther 2004;21:123-131. 4.Iorio R, Vadalà A, Argento G, et al. Bone tunnel

enlargement after ACL reconstruction using autologous hamstring tendons: A CT study. Int Orthop 2007;31:49-55.

5.Vadalà A, Iorio R, De Carli A, et al. Platelet-rich plasma: Does it help reduce tunnel widening after ACL recon-struction? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2013;21: 824-829.

6. Mayr R, Smekal V, Koidl C, et al. ACL reconstruction with adjustable-length loop cortical button fixation results in less tibial tunnel widening compared with interference screw fixation [published online August 1, 2019]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05642-9.

7.DeFroda SF, Karamchedu NP, Owens BD, et al. Tibial tunnel widening following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A retrospective seven-year study evalu-ating the effects of initial graft tensioning and graft se-lection. Knee 2018;25:1107-1114.

8.Lind M, Feller J, Webster KE. Tibial bone tunnel widening is reduced by polylactate/hydroxyapatite interference screws compared to metal screws after ACL reconstruc-tion with hamstring grafts. Knee 2009;16:447-451. 9.Clatworthy MG, Annear P, Bulow JU, Bartlett RJ. Tunnel

widening in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A prospective evaluation of hamstring and patella tendon grafts. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 1999;7:138-145. 10.Mermerkaya MU, Atay OA, Kaymaz B, et al. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a hamstring graft: A retrospective comparison of tunnel widening upon use of two different femoralfixation methods. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2015;23:2283-2291.

11.Marchant MH Jr, Willimon SC, Vinson E, et al. Compar-ison of plain radiography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of bone tunnel widening after anterior cruciate ligament recon-struction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2010;18: 1059-1064.

12.Choi NH, Lee SJ, Park SC, Victoroff BN. Comparison of postoperative tunnel widening after hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions between anatomic and nonanatomic femoral tunnels. Arthroscopy 2020;36: 1105-1111.

EDITORIAL COMMENTARY

1113

Downloaded for Anonymous User (n/a) at Istanbul Medipol University from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on August 04, 2020. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2020. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Referanslar

Benzer Belgeler

對於希望接受手術的人而言,最重要的是風險利益的評估,特別是屈光手術這類

Fig 9 noise corrupted secret image with noise density=0.7 Fig 10 reconstructed secret image in case 2 Case 3: Consider a fixed amount of salt and pepper noise density of 0.2,

In this project we have developed an “Electronics Concealed Box” which consists of Arduino, RTC (Real Time Clock), RFID Reader, RFID tags(Main Examiner and Invigilator),

Respondents' satisfaction with the content attractiveness of social networks in the indicators of accuracy and transparency, speed of broadcasting the news, neutrality of news,

At the point when the client query is taken care of to the System it initially goes through Preprocessing Techniques where the framework initially recognizes

共b兲 Band structures of constituent BN and graphene armchair nanoribbons having 18 atoms in their unit cells and the band structure of the superlattice BN 共18兲/AGNR共18兲

Karotid artere girildikten sonra ortaya çıkan serebral infarktüsün oluşumunda ekstrensek hematom basısı, karotid artere girildiği farkedildikten sonra aşırı manuel

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the program by comparing its implementation to that suggested by the literature, and, assisted by an assessment of teachers’ and