• Sonuç bulunamadı

Ek 13: Ders Değerlendirme Anketi COURSE EVALUATION SURVEY

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Ek 13: Ders Değerlendirme Anketi COURSE EVALUATION SURVEY"

Copied!
3
0
0

Yükleniyor.... (view fulltext now)

Tam metin

(1)

Ek 13: Ders Değerlendirme Anketi

COURSE EVALUATION SURVEY

Dear Student, this is a confidential survey and no student names are recorded or known. Your feedback and written comments will be valuable in determining 1) What’s going well for you so far in this course, 2) What needs improvement, 3) How we can improve this course. Thank you for your time and sincere responses.

PART A

Course Code/Title:

Course Section (if any):

Name of the Instructor:

Department:

Gender: ☐Female ☐Male

PART B

1. How long did your class take per week?

☐1h ☐1.5h ☐2h ☐3h

☐More 2. What was your attendance

rate in this course?

☐% 0-25 ☐% 25-50

☐% 50-75 ☐% 75-100 3. How many hours on average

did you spend per week on studying for this course (readings, homework assignments, project etc.)?

☐none ☐0-2 ☐3-4 ☐5-6

☐7-8 ☐9-10 ☐11-12 more 4. Based on your performance

what is your expected grade from this course

☐A ☐B ☐C ☐D ☐F 5. Compared to other courses

the amount of effort you put into this course was

☐ Higher ☐ Similar ☐ Lower 6. How often did your instructor

use Turkish during class sessions?

☐ Never ☐ Sometimes

☐ Frequently ☐ Always 7. What is your overall

evaluation of the course?

☐Excellent ☐Good ☐Average

☐Poor 8. I would enjoy taking another

course from this instructor

☐ Strongly Agree ☐ Agree

☐ Disagree ☐Strongly Disagree 9. How many course assistants

were there in this course (if any)?

☐none ☐1 ☐2

PART C

1: Strongly Disagree 2: Disagree 3: Neutral 4: Agree 5: Strongly Agree

If you had a course assistant(s) in this course, please rate the following items about the assistant on scale:

Assistant Name:………. 1 2 3 2 5

1. The teaching assistant provided helpful comments, timely feedback on assignments or quizzes

2. The teaching assistant was knowledgeable about the subject matter

3. The teaching assistant’s attitude

toward students was positive 4. The teaching assistant was available

and helpful outside the class 5. The teaching assistant seemed

sincerely interested in students’

learning

6. What is your overall evaluation of the course assistant(s) (if any)?

☐Excellent ☐Good

☐Average ☐Poor PART D

1: Strongly Disagree 2: Disagree 3: Neutral 4: Agree 5: Strongly Agree

Please rate the following items about the instructor

In my opinion the Instructor: 1 2 3 4 5 1. Explained course objectives and

requirements

2. Distributed syllabus in the first class and explained what is

expected from the course. 3. Explained students’ roles during

teaching/learning process of the course

4. Presented information effectively 5. Communicated positively and

respectfully with students 6. Was available to provide extra

academic support (explanations, additional resources etc.) when students needed

7. Encouraged students to take responsibility for their own learning

8. Initiated group work and

collaboration among students 9. Used different active teaching

methods (other than direct instruction) to encourage students to participate in the class

10. Used technology effectively 11. Used Canvas to make resources

and assignments available 12. Seemed to enjoy teaching 13. Was well prepared every class

session

14. Communicate in English

effectively

15. Demonstrated in-depth knowledge

regarding course topics 16. Gave useful and relevant

information in this course 17. Started and ended class on time 18. Did not waste class time 19. Used a great amount of the class

time for lecturing 20. Checked students’ understanding in

the class regularly 21. Helped distracted students to gain

concentration again 22. Managed the classroom well 23. Provided timely feedback about

assessment results (exams, quizzes, homework, projects etc.)

24. Provided effective feedback when

needed during the term

(2)

Ek 13: Ders Değerlendirme Anketi

COURSE EVALUATION SURVEY

25. Used different question types for the exams (open ended, multiple

choice, essay, true false etc.) 26. Used various assessment

techniques (group projects, portfolio, papers, presentations etc.)

27. Gave useful and relevant

homework assignments 28. Assessed what I learned in this

course fairly and accurately 29. The exams were announced ahead

of time and were held as scheduled 30. I would enjoy taking another

course from this instructor PART E

1: Strongly Disagree 2: Disagree 3: Neutral 4: Agree 5: Strongly Agree

Please rate the following items about the course

In my opinion the course: 1 2 3 4 5

1. Load was appropriate 2. Materials (textbook, course notes etc.)

were useful

3. Was interesting and motivating 4. The use of technology in this course

increased my overall learning 5. Enabled students to relate academic

knowledge to real life situations 6. Recitation sessions were relevant and

supplemented the lecture part of the course if there is one

7. Content was too difficult to

comprehend

8. Overall, I learned a lot in this course

Your written comments are the most valuable part of the course evaluation. This is a confidential survey and no student names are recorded or known. We will use the information to find out: 1) What’s going well for you so far in this course, 2) What needs improvement, 3) How we can improve this course. Thank you for your time and sincere responses.

1. Please explain what you liked most about this course

………

………

………

………

………

………

2. Please explain what you liked least about this course.

………

………

………

………

………

………

………

………

3. Please explain changes that you would recommend for improving this course (e.g., changes in course textbook, reading assignments, exams, homework, grading, teaching methods, extra class hours etc.)

………

………

………

………

………

………

4. If you have additional comments for the course please explain briefly.

………

………

………

………

………

………

5. Your opinions about large-group learning.

………

………

………

………

………

………

Thank you for your valuable feedback

(3)

Ek 13: Ders Değerlendirme Anketi

COURSE EVALUATION SURVEY

Referanslar

Benzer Belgeler

There were red to purple lagoon like areas, reddish hemorrhagic crusts and homogenous red areas in the middle of the lesion.. There were also linear white fence like

Bahçeşehir University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Dermatology, İstanbul; VM Medicalpark Hospital, Clinic of Dermatology, *Clinic of Rheumatology, Kocaeli, Turkey.. Berna

A 31-year-old man presented to our outpatient clinic with the complaints of alopecia and swelling of a number of skin lesions in different areas of his scalp which had been present

(a) Sagittal computed tomography (CT) image showing the inferior vena cava (IVC, black arrow) and an anomalous connection to IVC

Transthoracic echocardiography showed an anechoic area with a sharp border in the left ventricle (LV) (Figure 1 white arrow, Video 1).. Coronary angiography showed patent grafts

Her heart rate and blood pressure were 95 and 130/75, respectively.. Her electrocardiogram is displayed in

A 74-year-old female with a history of coronary artery disease (a coronary artery bypass graft surgery 7 years ago) presented to the emergency room in stable hemodynamic

Anadolu Kardiyoloji Dergisi’nin elektronik ortamda ayl›k ziyaret oran›nda nedenini çözemedi¤imiz ciddi bir art›fl oldu: Geçen y›l Ekim ay›nda 1844 ziyaretçimiz var