• Sonuç bulunamadı

An application of exp-function method to the generalized Burger’s- Huxley equation

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "An application of exp-function method to the generalized Burger’s- Huxley equation"

Copied!
13
0
0

Yükleniyor.... (view fulltext now)

Tam metin

(1)

Selçuk J. Appl. Math. Selçuk Journal of Vol. 10. No. 1. pp. 121-133, 2009 Applied Mathematics

An Application of Exp—Function Method to the Generalized Burger’s— Huxley Equation

M.M. Alipour2, D.D. Ganji1, A. G. Davodi3

1Department of Mechanical and Civil Engineering, Babol University of Technology,

Babol, Iran

e-mail: ddg_ davoo d@yaho o.com

2Department of Mechanical Engineering, K.N Toosi University of Technology, Tehran,

Iran

e-mail: m m alip our@ yaho o.com

3Department of Civil Engineering, Shahrood University of Technology, Shahrood, Iran

e-mail: a.g.davo di@ yahoo.com

Received: March 16, 2009

Abstract. In this work, we implement a relatively new analytical technique, the Exp—Function method, for solving nonlinear equations and absolutely special form of Generalized Burger’s—Huxley equation which may contain high nonlinear terms. This method can be used as an alternative to obtain analytical and approximate solutions of different types of fractional differential equations which applied in engineering mathematics. For more illustration of the efficiency and reliability of Exp method some numerical examples are presented. It is predicted that Exp—Function method can be found widely applicable in engineering. Key words: Exp—Function method; Generalized Burger’s—Huxley equation; Nonlinear Partial Differential equations.

2000 Mathematical Subject Classification: 35D10, 35D99, 35J70. 1. Introduction

Many problems in natural and engineering sciences are modeled by partial differ-ential equations. Nonlinear phenomena play important roles in applied mathe-matics, physics and also in engineering problems in which each parameter varies depending on different factors. Solving nonlinear equations may guide authors to know the described process deeply and sometimes leads them to know some facts which are not simply understood through common observations. More-over, obtaining exact solutions for these problems is a great purpose which has

(2)

been quite untouched. However, in recent years, numerical analysis [1] has con-siderably been developed to be used for nonlinear partial equations such as Gen-eralized Burger’s—Huxley equation that shows a prototype model for describing the interaction between reaction mechanisms, convection effects and diffusion transports [2]. The solitary waves and the existed property of a finite number of quantities (with physical interpretation) are conserved by the solutions. The Generalized Burger’s—Huxley equation is in the form of:

(1) + 

− = (1 − )(− )

∀ 0 ≤  ≤ 1  ≥ 0 ( 0) = ()

When  = 0  = 1 Eq. (1) is reduced to the Huxley equation which describes nerve pulse propagation in nerve fibers and wall motion in liquid crystals [3] and the subscripts t and x denote differentiation with respect to time and space, respectively.

In addition, in recent years, scientists have presented some new methods for solving nonlinear partial differential equations; for instance, Bäcklund transfor-mation method [4], Lie group method [5], Adomian’s decomposition method [6], inverse scattering method [7], Hirota’s bilinear method [8], homotopy analysis method [9] and He’s Homotopy perturbation method[10-11], He’s Variational iteration method[12-13] and Exp-Function method [14-15].

In this letter, we purpose to present implementation of Exp—Function method to generalized nonlinear Generalized Burger’s—Huxley equation. Having the available exact solution of special form of corresponding equations [16] would provide us to benefit an admissible comparison of the results which supports the applicability, accuracy and efficiency of the proposed methods.

2. Basic Idea of Exp-Function Method We first consider nonlinear equation form:

(2)  (        ) = 0

Introduction a complete variation defines as:

(3)  = ( + )  =  ()

and therefore, the Eq(1) is the construction of ODE of form:

(4)  ( 0 02002200 200   ) = 0 and then solution of  () is form:

(3)

(5)  () =  P =− exp()  P =− exp() =exp() +  + −exp(−) exp() +  + −exp(−)

where    and  are positive integers which are unknown to be further de-termined,  and  are unknown constants.

3. Application of Exp—Function Method to Generalized Burger’s— Huxley Equation

We begin with the transformation ( ) = ( ) or ( ) = 1( ), and

have: (6) = 1  1  −1 =  1  1  −1 = 1 [ 1  −1+ ( 1 − 1) 1  −22 ] (1 − )(− ) = 1(1 − )( − )

Substituting these results into Eq. (1), we have:

(7) 1  1  −1[+ − − ( 1  − 1) 2 −1] =  1 (1 − )( − )

Eq. (7) is simplified as follows:

(8) + − − (

1  − 1)

2

−1= (1 − )( − )

Introducing a complex variation  defined as Eq.(3), Eq. (8) becomes an ordi-nary differential equation which reforms to:

(9) 0+  02(00+ (1

− 1)

02−1) −  (1 −  )( − ) = 0

In order to determine values of  and , we balance the linear term of the highest order 00with the highest order nonlinear term 3 in Eq. (9), we have:

(10) 00=1exp [( + 3) ] +  2exp [4] + 

(11) 3= 3exp [(3 + ) ] +  4exp [4] + 

(4)

where are determined coefficients only for simplicity. Balancing highest order

of Exp—function in Eq. (10) and (11), we have:

(12)  + 3 = 3 + 

which leads to the result:

(13)  = 

Similarly to determine values of  and , we balance the linear term of lowest order in Eq. (9) (14) 00= + 1exp [− ( + 3) ]  + 2exp [−4] and (15) 3=  + 3exp [− (3 + ) ]  + 4exp[−4]

where are determined coefficients only for simplicity. Balancing lowest order

of Exp—Function into Eqs. (14) and (15), we have:

(16) − ( + 3) = − (3 + )

This leads to the result:

(17)  = 

Case 1:  =  = 1,  =  = 1

According to this case, Eq. (5) reduces to:

(18)  () = 1exp() + 0+ −1exp(−) exp() + 0+ −1exp(−)

Substituting Eq. (18) into Eq. (9), and by the help of MAPLE, we have:

(19) 1 {4 4+  33+ 22+ 1+ 0+ −1− +−2−2+  −3−3+ −4−4)} = 0

(5)

and are coefficients of exp(). All mentioned relations and equations which

are unknown in this case are added to this paper in appendix.

Equating the coefficients of exp() must be zero, and therefore we have:

(20) 1= 0 2= 0 3= 0 4= 0 0= 0 −1= 0 −2= 0 −3= 0 −4= 0

Solving the system Eq. (20), simultaneously yields the following sets of nontriv-ial solutions: (21) 0= 0 −1= 0 −1= −1 0= 0 1= 1 1=   = −[ − p 2+ 4(1 + )] 4(1 + )   = 2[ − 2(1 + )+ (1 +  − )  + p2+ 4(1 + )] = − (1 + )− (1 +  − )( −p2+ 4(1 + )) 2(1 + )  (22) 0= 0+ −1 0  −1= 0 −1= −1 0= 0 1= 1 1= 1  = −[ − p 2+ 4(1 + )] 2(1 + )   = 2[ − 2(1 + )+ ( +  − 1)  +p2+ 4(1 + )] = − (1 + )− ( +  − 1)( −p2+ 4(1 + )) 2(1 + )  (23) 0= 0 −1= 0 −1= − 0(0− 0) 2  0= 0 1= 1 1=   = −[ − p 2+ 4(1 + )] 2(1 + )   = 2[ − 2(1 + )+ (1 +  − )  + p2+ 4(1 + )] = − (1 + )− (1 +  − )( −p2+ 4(1 + )) 2(1 + )  (24) 0= 0 −1= 0 −1= 0 0= 0 1= 1 1= 1  = −[ − p 2+ 4(1 + )] 2(1 + )   = 2[ − 2(1 + )+ ( +  − 1)  +p2+ 4(1 + )] = − (1 + )− ( +  − 1)( −p2+ 4(1 + )) 2(1 + ) 

(6)

(25) 0= 0 −1 = 0 −1= −1 0= 0 1= 1 1= 1  = −[ − p 2+ 4(1 + )] 4(1 + )   = 2[ − 2(1 + )+ ( +  − 1)  +p2+ 4(1 + )] = − (1 + )− ( +  − 1)( −p2+ 4(1 + )) 2(1 + )  (26) 0= 0 −1= 0(0−0) −1= 0(0−0) 0= 0 1= 1 1= 0  = −[ + p 2+ 4(1 + )] 2(1 + )   = 2[ − 2(1 + )+ ( +  − 1)  −p2+ 4(1 + )] = − (1 + )− ( +  − 1)( +p2+ 4(1 + )) 2(1 + )  (27) 0= 0 −1 = −1 −1= −1 0= 0 1= 1 1= 0  = [ − p 2+ 4(1 + )] 4(1 + )   = 2[  2(1 + )− (1 +  − )  − p2+ 4(1 + )] =  =  (1 + )+ (1 +  − )( −p2+ 4(1 + )) 2(1 + )  (28) 0= 0 −1 = −1 −1= −1 0= 0 1= 1 1= 0  = [ + p 2+ 4(1 + )] 4(1 + )   = 2[ − 2(1 + )+ (1 +  − )  − p2+ 4(1 + )] = − (1 + )− (1 +  − )( +p2+ 4(1 + )) 2(1 + ) 

Substituting these results into Eq. (18), and  = ( + )we obtain the follow-ing generalized solitonary solutions of Eq. (8) solution

(29) 1( ) =  exp[( + )] exp[( + )] + −1exp[−( + )]  = −[ − p 2+ 4(1 + )] 4(1 + )   = − (1 + )− (1 +  − )( −p2+ 4(1 + )) 2(1 + ) 

(7)

where, −1 is arbitrary constant parameter. Substituting −1 = 1 into Eq.(29), we have the following closed form of Eq. (8) and Eq. ( 1)

(30) 1( ) =  exp[( + )] exp[( + )] + exp[−( + )] =  2[1 + tanh(( + )] 1( ) = [  2+  2tanh(( + )] 1   = −[ − p 2+ 4(1 + )] 4(1 + )   = − (1 + )− (1 +  − )( −p2+ 4(1 + )) 2(1 + )  2( ) = exp[( + )] + 0 exp[( + )] + 0+−10 + −1exp[−( + )] (31) 2( ) = ( exp[( + )] + 0 exp[( + )] + 0+−10 + −1exp[−( + )] )1  = −[ − p 2+ 4(1 + )] 2(1 + )   = − (1 + )− ( +  − 1)( −p2+ 4(1 + )) 2(1 + )  (32) 3( ) =  exp[( + )] + 0 exp[( + )] + 0−0(0−2 0)exp[−( + )] 3( ) = (  exp[( + )] + 0 exp[( + )] + 0−0(0−2 0)exp[−( + )] )1  = −[ − p 2+ 4(1 + )] 2(1 + )   = − (1 + )− (1 +  − )( −p2+ 4(1 + )) 2(1 + )  (33) 4( ) = exp[( + )] exp[( + )] + 0] 4( ) = ( exp[( + )] exp[( + )] + 0] )1  = −[ − p 2+ 4(1 + )] 2(1 + )   = − (1 + )− ( +  − 1)( −p2+ 4(1 + )) 2(1 + ) 

(8)

(34) 5( ) = exp[( + )] exp[( + )] + −1exp[−( + )] 5( ) = ( exp[( + )] exp[( + )] + −1exp[−( + )]) 1   = −[ − p 2+ 4(1 + )] 4(1 + )   = − (1 + )− ( +  − 1)( −p2+ 4(1 + )) 2(1 + ) 

where, −1 is arbitrary constant parameter. Substituting −1 = 1 into Eq.(34), we have the following closed form of Eq. ( 8) and Eq. ( 1)

(35) 5( ) = exp[( + )] exp[( + )] + exp[−( + )] = 1 2+ 1 2tanh(( + )) 5( ) = [ 1 2+ 1 2tanh(( + )] 1   = −[ − p 2+ 4(1 + )] 4(1 + )   = − (1 + )− ( +  − 1)( −p2+ 4(1 + )) 2(1 + )  (36) 6( ) = 0+ 0(0− 0) exp[( + )] exp[( + )] + 0+ 0(0− 0) exp[−( + )] 6( ) = ( 0+ 0(0− 0) exp[( + )] exp[( + )] + 0+ 0(0− 0) exp[−( + )] )1  = −[ + p 2+ 4(1 + )] 2(1 + )   = − (1 + )− ( +  − 1)( +p2+ 4(1 + )) 2(1 + )  (37) 7( ) = 0+ −1exp[−( + )] exp[( + )] + −1exp[−( + )] 7( ) = ( 0+ −1exp[−( + )] exp[( + )] + −1exp[−( + )]) 1   =[ − p 2+ 4(1 + )] 4(1 + )   =  (1 + )+ (1 +  − )( −p2+ 4(1 + )) 2(1 + ) 

where, −1 0are arbitrary constant parameters. Substituting −1= 1 0= 0

(9)

(38) 7( ) =  exp[−( + )] exp[( + )] + exp[−( + )] =  2[1 + tanh(−( + )] 7( ) = [  2+  2tanh(−( + )] 1   =[ − p 2+ 4(1 + )] 4(1 + )   =  (1 + )+ (1 +  − )( −p2+ 4(1 + )) 2(1 + )  (39) 8( ) = 0+ −1exp[−( + )] exp[( + )] + −1exp[−( + )] 8( ) = ( 0+ −1exp[−( + )] exp[( + )] + −1exp[−( + )]) 1   =[ + p 2+ 4(1 + )] 4(1 + )   = − (1 + )− (1 +  − )( +p2+ 4(1 + )) 2(1 + ) 

where, −1 0are arbitrary constant parameters. Substituting −1= 1 0= 0

into Eq.(39), we have the following closed form of Eq. ( 8) and Eq. (1)

(40) 8( ) =  exp[−( + )] exp[( + )] + exp[−( + )] =  2[1 + tanh(−( + )] 8( ) = [  2+  2tanh(−( + )] 1   =[ + p 2+ 4(1 + )] 4(1 + )   = − (1 + )− (1 +  − )( +p2+ 4(1 + )) 2(1 + )  Case2:  =  = 2, =  = 2

As mentioned above the values of  and  can be freely chosen, we set  =  = 2 and  =  = 2, then the trial function, Eq. (4) becomes:

(41)  () = 2exp(2) + 1exp() + 0+ −1exp(−) + −2exp(−2) 2exp(2) + 1exp() + 0+ −1exp(−) + −2exp(−2)

There are some free parameters in Eq. (41), we set 2= 1, 1= 0 −1= 0 and

(10)

(42)  () = 2exp(2) + 0+ −2exp(−2) exp(2) + 0+ −1exp(−) + −2exp(−2)

By the same manipulation as illustrated above, we obtain:

(43) 0= 0 −2= 0 −2= −2 0= 0 2= 1 2=  −1= 0  = −[ − p 2+ 4(1 + )] 8(1 + )   = [ − 2(1 + )+ (1 +  − )  + p2+ 4(1 + )] = − 2(1 + )− (1 +  − )( −p2+ 4(1 + )) 4(1 + ) 

where, −2is arbitrary constant parameter. Substituting Eq. (43) into (42) yields the following solution:

(44)  () =  exp(2) exp(2) + −2exp(−2)  = −[ − p 2+ 4(1 + )] 8(1 + )   = − 2(1 + ) − (1 +  − )( −p2+ 4(1 + )) 4(1 + )  Or (45) ( ) =  exp[2( + )] exp[2( + )] + −2exp[−2( + )]  = −[ − p 2+ 4(1 + )] 8(1 + )   = − 2(1 + ) − (1 +  − )( −p2+ 4(1 + )) 4(1 + ) 

Substituting −2 = 1 into Eq.(45), we have the following closed form of Eq. ( 8) and Eq. (1) (46) ( ) =  exp[( + )] exp[( + )] + exp[−( + )] =  2[1 + tanh(( + )] ( ) = [ 2+  2tanh(( + )] 1   = −[ − p 2+ 4(1 + )] 4(1 + )   = − (1 + )− (1 +  − )( −p2+ 4(1 + )) 2(1 + ) 

(11)

4. Conclusion

In this Letter, the Exp—Function method was used for finding solutions of Gen-eralized Burger’s—Huxley equation which may contain high nonlinear terms. It can be concluded that the Exp—Function method is very powerful and efficient technique in finding exact solutions for wide class of problems.

The Exp—Function method has many merits and more advantages than exact solutions. Calculations in the Exp—Function method are simple and straight-forward. The reliability of the method and reduction in the size of computa-tional domain gives this method a wider applicability. The results show that Exp—Function method is a powerful mathematical tool for solving systems of nonlinear partial differential equations having wide applications in engineering. References

1. R.L. Burden, J.D. Faires, Numerical Analysis, PWS Publishing Company, Boston, 1993.

2. J. Satsuma, in: M. Ablowitz, B. Fuchssteiner, M. Kruskal (Eds.), Topics in Soliton Theory and Exactly Solvable Nonlinear Equations, World Scientific, Singapore, 1987. 3. X.Y. Wang, Z.S. Zhu, Y.K. Lu, Solitary wave solutions of the generalized Burgers— Huxley equation, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 23 (1990) 271—274.

4. C. Rogers, W.F. Shadwich, Bäcklund Transformations and Their Application, Aca-demic Press, New York, 1982.

5. P.J. Olver, Applications of Lie Groups to Differential Equations, Springer, Berlin, 1986.

6. G. Adomian, A review of the decomposition method in applied mathematics, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 135 (2) (1988) 501—544.

7. C.S. Gardner, J.M. Green, M.D. Kruskal, R.M. Miura, Phys. Rev. Lett. 19 (1967) 1095.

8. R. Hirota, Phys. Rev. Lett. 27 (1971) 1192.

9. A. kimiaeifar, S. R. Mohebpour, A. R. Sohouli, G. Domairry, A.G. Davodi, An-alytical Solution for Large Deflections of a Cantilever Beam under Nonconservative Load Based on Homotopy Analysis Method, Numerical Methods for Partial Differen-tial Equations, In Press.

10. J.H. He, Asymptotology by homotopy perturbation method, Appl. Math. Com-put. 156 (3) (2004) 591—596.

11. J.H. He, A coupling method of a homotopy technique and a perturbation technique for non-linear problems, Int. J. Non-Linear Mech. 35 (2000) 37—43.

12. J.H. He, Variational iteration method for autonomous ordinary differential sys-tems, Appl. Math. Comput. 114 (2000) 115—123.

13. SHA. Hashemi Kachapi, D. D. Ganji, A. G. Davodi, S. M. Varedi, Periodic solution for strongly nonlinear vibration systems by He’s variational iteration method, Mathematical Methods in the Applied Sciences, DOI: 10.1002/mma.1135 .

14. G. Domairry, Amin G. Davodi, Arash G. Davodi, Solutions for the double Sine-Gordon equation by Exp-function, Tanh, and extended Tanh methods, Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations, DOI: 10.1002/num.20440 .

(12)

15. D. D. Ganji, A. G. Davodi, Y. A. Geraily, New exact solutions for seventh-order Sawada-Kotera-Ito, Lax and Kaup-Kupershmidt equations using EXP-Function method, Mathematical Methods in the Applied Sciences, In Press.

16. S.D. Zhu, Exp-function method for the hybrid-lattice system, Int. J Non-Linear Sci. Numer. Solution 8 (3) (2007) 461—464.

Appendix:

Case 1, Generalized Burger’s—Huxley equation:  = (+ 0+ −1−)4 4= −231+  2 21− 231+ 241= 0 3= 2210− 2310+ 22120− 210+ 120− 32210 −322 10+ 2201+ 42310− 01− 2310− 201 +3 10= 0 2= 622120− 3 2 2 1−1+ 4231−1− 42−11− 322100 +22 100+ 221−1+ 4212−1+ 2120+ 231−1 −2−11− 2120− 20− 221−1+ 22100 +220− 3212−1+ 42100− 231−1− 322100 −22 0+ 2221−1+ 22−11+ 21220− 32120− 32120 −23 1−122120= 0 1= −322010− 322010− 6210−1− 62101 +122210−1− 32210−1− 230− 42−10+ 42130+ 5210−1 −200+ 21−10− 610−1+ 4220−1+ 1200− 3−10 −2−10+ 2120−1+ 621−10− 6210−1+ 2010− 30 −2−110− 42210−1+ 421−10+ 2200− 21200+ 21−10 +32 10−1+ 221200+ 22210−1− 230+ 22−10+ 22200 +421−10− 3221−10− 32210−1+ 42−110− 3221−10= 0 0= 22120−1− 32120−1− 422−1− 3 2 2 1−1−1 −6210−10+ 2212−1− 3220−1+ 821−1−1+ 22−1+ 622 12−1− 42120−1+ 240− 3212−1+ 122120−1− 22100−1 +222 0−1− 3221−1−1− 22−1+ 42−100+ 42100−1 −23 00− 321−12 + 22020−  2 3 00+ 2212−1+ 2220−1 −32120−1+ 421−1−1− 3220−1+ 4220−1− 6210−10 −4−100− 402−1− 22−100+ 22120−1+ 4100−1 −42212−1− 420−1+ 4120−1+ 421−1−1= 0

(13)

−1= 122102−1+ 4230−1− 621−1−10− 212−10− 230−1 +42 1−1−10+ 62−10−1− 02−10+ 30−1+ 61−10−1 −42 12−10− 422−10+ 42−10−1− 2−10−1− 621−10−1 −2 −1200+ 220−10+ 21−1−10− 32−10+ 22−10 −12−10+ 3102−1− −1200+ 20−10− 502−1 −322 0−10+ 421−1−10− 3212−10− 320−12 + 22−1200 +2212−10− 621−10−1− 3202−1+ 22−12 0− 230−1 −3212−10+ 2220−10+ 42−10−1− 3220−10= 0 −2= 4213−1+ 62202−1+ 22−100−1− 2−12 −1+ 202−1 −22 02−1−  2 3 −1+ 220−1−1− 23−1− 4212−1−1− 2−120 +422−1−1+ 212−1−1− 2002−1+ 212−1−1− 32∗ 02−10 +42−100−1+ 22−120− 3202−1−1− 322−11−1+ 2202−1 +2212−1−1+ 2 ∗ 22−1−1− 3202−10− 3220−1−1 −322 −11−1− 2−13 − 22−120= 0 −3= −2 02−1−1− 322−10−1− 23−10− 2−10−1 +02−1−1− 23−10+ 202−1−1+ 2−10−1− 3−10 +222 −10−1+ 4203−1+ 22−10−1− 322−10−1= 0 −4 = −23−1−1− 23−1−1+ 22−12−1+ 24−1= 0

Referanslar

Benzer Belgeler

In order to test the validity of these hypothesis, the “difference-in-differences” analysis was used between Turkey and the 17 EU member countries in the euro zone. The results of

It is not necessary to use all of the equations (5) for a …rst integral to be found from system (5), known as Charpit equations.. However, in the …rst integral we will …nd, at least

Buna kar:?lltk Lloyd ve arkada:?lan (4) 12 olguluk etmoidal mukosel seri- lerinde posterior etmoid kaynakh mukosele rastlama- dllar. Onlara gore posterior etmoid mukoseli sfenoid

Aşık oyunu, çenber, çevgan, reml, tavla ve satranç oyunlarından bazıları günümüzde aynı biçim ve isimle oynanan şekilleri ile hala devam etmektedir..

In Chapter 3, we presented a detailed analysis for the solution of sparse linear systems using three basic iterative methods: Jacobi, Gauss Seidel and

[r]

İnsan ve çevre sağlığı açısından potansiyel tehlike yaratan tıbbi atıkların, tekniğine uygun olarak toplanması, geçici depolanması ve bertaraf alanına taşınması

In this thesis, we discussed the Series Methods like Adomian Method, Variational Iteration Method and Homotopy Perturbation Methods, and Solitary Methods such as