JHEP12(2017)085
Published for SISSA by SpringerReceived: September 14, 2017 Accepted: November 21, 2017 Published: December 15, 2017
Search for a scalar partner of the top quark in the jets
plus missing transverse momentum final state at
√
s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector
The ATLAS collaboration
E-mail: atlas.publications@cern.ch
Abstract: A search for pair production of a scalar partner of the top quark in events with four or more jets plus missing transverse momentum is presented. An analysis of 36.1 fb−1 of √s = 13 TeV proton-proton collisions collected using the ATLAS detector at the LHC yields no significant excess over the expected Standard Model background. To interpret the results a simplified supersymmetric model is used where the top squark is assumed to decay via ˜t1 → t(∗)χ˜01 and ˜t1 → b ˜χ±1 → bW(∗)χ˜01, where ˜χ01 ( ˜χ
±
1) denotes the lightest neutralino (chargino). Exclusion limits are placed in terms of the top-squark and neutralino masses. Assuming a branching ratio of 100% to t ˜χ0
1, top-squark masses in the range 450–1000 GeV are excluded for ˜χ0
1 masses below 160 GeV. In the case where m˜t1 ∼ mt+ mχ˜01, top-squark masses in the range 235–590 GeV are excluded.
Keywords: Hadron-Hadron scattering (experiments)
JHEP12(2017)085
Contents1 Introduction 1
2 ATLAS detector 3
3 Trigger and data collection 4
4 Simulated event samples and signal modelling 4
5 Event reconstruction 5
6 Signal region definitions 7
7 Background estimation 12
8 Systematic uncertainties 19
9 Results and interpretation 22
10 Conclusions 28
The ATLAS collaboration 39
1 Introduction
Supersymmetry (SUSY) [1–6] is an extension of the Standard Model (SM) that can resolve, for example, the gauge hierarchy problem [7–10] by introducing supersymmetric partners of the known bosons and fermions. The SUSY partner to the top quark, the top squark (˜t), plays an important role in cancelling potentially large top-quark loop corrections in the Higgs boson mass. The superpartners of the left- and right-handed top quarks, ˜tL and ˜
tR, mix to form the two mass eigenstates ˜t1and ˜t2, where ˜t1 is the lighter one. Throughout this paper it is assumed that the analysis is only sensitive to ˜t1.
In R-parity-conserving SUSY models [11], the supersymmetric partners are produced in pairs. Top squarks are produced by strong interactions through quark-antiquark (q ¯q) annihilation or gluon-gluon fusion, and the cross section of direct top-squark pair produc-tion is largely decoupled from the specific choice of SUSY model parameters [12–15]. The decay of the top squark depends on the mixing of the superpartners of left- and right-handed top quarks, the masses of the top superpartner, and the mixing parameters of the fermionic partners of the electroweak and Higgs bosons. The mass eigenstates of the partners of electroweak gauge and Higgs bosons (binos, winos, higgsinos) are collectively known as charginos, ˜χ±i , i = 1, 2, and neutralinos, ˜χ0
i, i = 1, . . . , 4, where ˜χ 0
JHEP12(2017)085
to be the lightest supersymmetric particle (LSP) which is stable and a dark-matter can-didate [16, 17]. For the models considered, either ˜χ02 or ˜χ
±
1 is assumed to be the next
lightest supersymmetric particle (NLSP). Three different decay scenarios are considered in this search: (a) both top squarks decay via ˜t1 → t(∗)χ˜01, (b) at least one of the top squarks decays via ˜t1→ b ˜χ
±
1 → bW(∗)χ˜01, with various hypotheses for mχ˜0
1 and mχ˜±1, and (c) where mχ˜0
2 is small enough for at least one top squark to decay via ˜t1 → t ˜ χ0
2 → h/Z ˜χ01, where h is the SM-like Higgs boson with a mass of 125 GeV, as illustrated in figure 1(a)−(c), respectively. The interpretation of the results uses simplified models [18–20] where only one or two decay steps are allowed. In the case with two allowed decays, referred to later in this paper as a natural SUSY-inspired mixed grid, the mass splitting between the ˜χ±1 and the ˜χ01, ∆m( ˜χ
±
1, ˜χ01), is assumed to be 1 GeV. A grid of signal samples is generated across the plane of the top-squark and ˜χ01 masses with a grid spacing of 50 GeV across most of the plane, assuming maximal mixing between the partners of the left- and right-handed top quarks. In both the one- and two-step decay scenarios the LSP is considered to be a pure bino state. Additionally, results are interpreted in two slices of phenomenological MSSM (pMSSM) [21,22] models, referred to as wino-NLSP and well-tempered neutralino pMSSM models in the remainder of this paper. The pMSSM models are based on the more gen-eral MSSM [23,24] but with the additional requirements of no new sources of CP violation and flavour-changing neutral currents, as well as first- and second-generation sfermion mass and trilinear coupling degeneracy. Finally, results are also interpreted in a simplified model which is inspired by the pMSSM and is referred to as non-asymptotic higgsino. Details of the models that are used in the various interpretations are given in section 9.
In addition to direct pair production, top squarks can be produced indirectly through gluino decays, as shown in figure 1(d). This search considers models where the mass difference between the top squark and the neutralino is small, i.e. ∆m(˜t1, ˜χ
0
1) = 5 GeV. In this scenario, the jets originating from the ˜t1decays have momenta below the experimental acceptance, resulting in a signature nearly identical to that of ˜t1 → t ˜χ01 signal models (figure 1(a)).
This paper presents the search for top-squark pair production using a time-integrated luminosity of 36.1 fb−1of proton-proton (pp) collisions data provided by the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at a centre-of-mass energy of √s = 13 TeV. The data were collected by the ATLAS detector in 2015 and 2016. All-hadronic final states with at least four jets and large missing transverse momentum1 (pmiss
T , whose magnitude is referred to as ETmiss) are considered, and the results are interpreted according to a variety of signal models as described above. Signal regions are defined to maximize the experimental sensitivity over a large region of kinematic phase space. Sensitivity to high top-squark masses ∼ 1000 GeV (as in figure 1(a)) and top squarks produced through gluino decays (as in figure 1(d))
1
ATLAS uses a right-handed coordinate system with its origin at the nominal interaction point (IP) in the centre of the detector and the z-axis along the beam pipe. The x-axis points from the IP to the centre of the LHC ring, and the y-axis points upwards. Cylindrical coordinates (r, φ) are used in the transverse plane, φ being the azimuthal angle around the z-axis. The pseudorapidity is defined in terms of the polar angle θ as η = − ln tan(θ/2). Angular distance is measured in units of ∆R ≡ p(∆η)2+ (∆φ)2. The
JHEP12(2017)085
˜ t ˜ t t t p p ˜ χ0 1 b W ˜ χ0 1 b W (a) ˜t1→ t(∗)χ˜ 0 1 (b) ˜t1→ b ˜χ ± 1 → bW(∗)χ˜ 0 1 ˜ t ˜ t ˜ χ0 2 ˜ χ± 1 p p t ˜ χ0 1 h/Z b ˜ χ0 1 W (c) ˜t1 → t ˜χ 0 2→ h/Z ˜χ01 (d) ˜g → t˜t1→ t ˜χ 0 1+softFigure 1. The decay topologies of the signal models considered with experimental signatures of four or more jets plus missing transverse momentum. Decay products that have transverse momenta below detector thresholds are designated by the term “soft”.
is achieved by exploiting techniques designed to reconstruct top quarks that are Lorentz-boosted in the lab frame. The dominant SM background process for this kinematic region is Z → ν ¯ν produced in association with jets initiated by heavy-flavour quarks (heavy-flavour jets). The sensitivity to the decay into b ˜χ±1 is enhanced by vetoing events containing hadronically decaying top-quark candidates to reduce the t¯t background, leaving Z → ν ¯ν as the largest SM background. Sensitivity to the region where m˜t1 − mχ˜0
1 ∼ mt, which typically has relatively low-pTfinal-state jets and low ETmiss, is achieved by exploiting events in which high-pT jets from initial-state radiation (ISR) boosts the di-top-squark system in the transverse plane. For this regime, t¯t production gives the dominant background contribution. Similar searches based on√s = 8 TeV and√s = 13 TeV data collected at the LHC have been performed by both the ATLAS [25–28] and CMS [29–33] collaborations.
2 ATLAS detector
The ATLAS experiment [34] at the LHC is a multi-purpose particle detector with a cylin-drical forward-backward and φ-symmetric geometry and an approximate 4π coverage in solid angle. It consists of an inner tracking detector surrounded by a thin superconducting solenoid providing a 2 T axial magnetic field, electromagnetic and hadron calorimeters, and a muon spectrometer. The inner tracking detector covers the pseudorapidity range |η| < 2.5. It consists of silicon pixel, silicon microstrip, and transition radiation tracking detectors. The newly installed innermost layer of pixel sensors [35,36] was operational for the first time during the 2015 data-taking. Lead/liquid-argon (LAr) sampling calorime-ters provide electromagnetic (EM) energy measurements with high granularity. A hadron
JHEP12(2017)085
(steel/scintillator-tile) calorimeter covers the central pseudorapidity range (|η| < 1.7). The end-cap and forward regions are instrumented with LAr calorimeters for both the EM and hadronic energy measurements up to |η| = 4.9. The muon spectrometer surrounds the calorimeters and features three large air-core toroidal superconducting magnets with eight coils each, providing coverage up to |η| = 2.7. The field integral of the toroids ranges be-tween 2.0 and 6.0 Tm across most of the detector. It includes a system of precision tracking chambers and fast detectors for triggering.
3 Trigger and data collection
The data were collected from August to November 2015 and April to October 2016 at a pp centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV with 25 ns bunch spacing. A two-level trigger system [37] is used to select events. The first-level trigger is implemented in hardware and uses a subset of the detector information to reduce the event rate to at most 100 kHz. This is followed by a software-based trigger that reduces the accepted event rate to 1 kHz for offline storage.
In all search regions, a missing transverse momentum trigger, which is fully efficient for offline calibrated Emiss
T > 250 GeV in signal events, was used to collect data events. Data samples enriched in the major sources of background were collected with electron or muon triggers. The electron trigger selects events based on the presence of clusters of energy in the electromagnetic calorimeter, with a shower shape consistent with that expected for an electron, and a matching track in the tracking system. The muon trigger selects events containing one or more muon candidates based on tracks identified in the muon spectrometer and inner detector. The electron and muon triggers used are more than 99% efficient for isolated electrons and muons with pT above 28 GeV.
Triggers based on the presence of high-pT jets were used to collect data samples for the estimation of the multijet and all-hadronic t¯t background. The jet pT thresholds ranged from 20 to 400 GeV. In order to stay within the bandwidth limits of the trigger system, only a fraction of the events passing these triggers was recorded to permanent storage.
4 Simulated event samples and signal modelling
Simulated events are used to model the SUSY signal and to aid in the
de-scription of the background processes. Signal models were all generated with
MG5 aMC@NLO 2.2-2.4 [38] interfaced to PYTHIA8 [39] for the parton showering (PS) and hadronization and with EvtGen 1.2.0 [40] for the b- and c-hadron decays. The matrix element (ME) calculation was performed at tree level and includes the emission of up to two additional partons for all signal samples. The parton distribution function (PDF) set used for the generation of the signal samples is NNPDF2.3LO [41] with the A14 [42] set of tuned underlying-event and shower parameters (UE tune). The ME-PS matching was performed with the CKKW-L [43] prescription, with a matching scale set to one quarter of the mass of the ˜t1, or ˜g for the gluino pair production model. All signal cross sections were calculated to next-to-leading order in the strong coupling constant, adding the resummation of soft-gluon emission at next-to-leading-logarithm accuracy (NLO+NLL) [12–14]. The nominal
JHEP12(2017)085
cross section and the uncertainty were taken from an envelope of cross-section predic-tions using different PDF sets and factorization and renormalization scales, as described in ref. [15]. For pMSSM models, the sparticle mass spectra were calculated with Softsusy 3.7.3 [44, 45] while the decays of each sparticle were performed by HDECAY 3.4 [46] and SDECAY 1.5/1.5a [47].
SM background samples were generated with different MC event generators depending on the process. The background sources of Z + jets and W + jets events were
gener-ated with SHERPA 2.2.1 [48] using the NNPDF3.0NNLO [41] PDF set and the UE tune
provided by SHERPA. Top-quark pair production where at least one of the top quarks de-cays semileptonically and single-top production were simulated with Powheg-Box 2 [49] and interfaced to PYTHIA6 [50] for PS and hadronization, with the CT10 [51] PDF set and using the Perugia2012 [52] set of tuned shower and underlying-event parameters. MG5 aMC@NLO interfaced to PYTHIA8 for PS and hadronization was used to generate the t¯t+V (where V is a W or Z boson) and t¯t+γ samples at NLO with the NNPDF3.0NLO PDF set. The underlying-event tune used is A14 with the NNPDF2.3LO PDF set. Diboson production was generated with SHERPA 2.2.1 using the CT10 PDF set. Finally, V γ pro-cesses were generated with SHERPA 2.1 using the CT10 PDF set. Additional information can be found in refs. [53–57].
The detector simulation [58] was performed using either GEANT4 [59] or a fast simu-lation framework where the showers in the electromagnetic and hadronic calorimeters are simulated with a parameterized description [60] and the rest of the detector is simulated with GEANT4. The fast simulation was validated against full GEANT4 simulation for several selected signal samples and subsequently used for all signal samples because of the large number of signal grid points needed for interpretation. All SM background sam-ples used the GEANT4 set-up. All MC samsam-ples were produced with a varying number of simulated minimum-bias interactions overlaid on the hard-scattering event to account for multiple pp interactions in the same or nearby bunch crossing (pile-up). These events were produced using PYTHIA8 with the A2 tune [61] and MSTW 2008 PDF set [62]. The sim-ulated events were reweighted to match the distribution of the number of pp interactions per bunch crossing in data. Corrections were applied to the simulated events to correct for differences between data and simulation for the lepton-trigger and reconstruction efficien-cies, momentum scale, energy resolution, isolation, and for the efficiency of identifying jets containing b-hadrons, together with the probability for mis-tagging jets containing only light-flavour and charm hadrons.
5 Event reconstruction
Events are required to have a primary vertex [63] reconstructed from at least two tracks with pT> 400 MeV. Among the vertices found, the vertex with the largest summed p2T of the associated tracks is chosen.
Jets are reconstructed from three-dimensional topological clusters of noise-suppressed calorimeter cells [64] using the anti-kt jet algorithm [65, 66] with a radius parameter R = 0.4. An area-based correction is applied to account for energy from additional pp
col-JHEP12(2017)085
lisions based on an estimate of the pile-up activity in a given event [67]. Calibrated [68] jet candidates are required to have pT > 20 GeV and |η| < 2.8. Events containing jets arising from non-collision sources or detector noise [69] are removed (“no bad jets” requirement). Additional selections based on track information are applied to jets with pT< 60 GeV and |η| < 2.4 to reject jets that originate from pile-up interactions [70].
Jets containing b-hadrons and which are within the inner detector acceptance (|η| < 2.5) are identified (as b-tagged jets) with a multivariate algorithm that exploits the impact parameters of the charged-particle tracks, the presence of secondary vertices, and the reconstructed flight paths of b- and c-hadrons inside the jet [71–73]. The output of the multivariate algorithm is a single b-tagging weight which signifies the likelihood of a jet con-taining b-hadrons. The average identification efficiency of jets concon-taining b-hadrons is 77% as determined in simulated t¯t events. A rejection factor of approximately 130 is reached for jets initiated by light quarks and gluons and 6 for jets initiated by charm quarks.
Electron candidates are reconstructed from clusters of energy deposits in the electro-magnetic calorimeter that are matched to a track in the inner detector. They are required to have |η| < 2.47, pT> 7 GeV and must pass a variant of the “very loose” likelihood-based selection [74,75]. The electromagnetic shower of an electron can also form a jet such that a procedure is required to resolve this ambiguity. In the case where the separation between an electron candidate and a non-b-tagged (b-tagged) jet is ∆R < 0.2,2 the candidate is
considered to be an electron (b-tagged jet). If the separation between an electron candi-date and any jet satisfies 0.2 < ∆R < 0.4, the candicandi-date is considered to be a jet, and the electron candidate is removed.
Muons are reconstructed by matching tracks in the inner detector to tracks in the muon spectrometer and are required to have |η| < 2.7 and pT> 6 GeV. If the separation between a muon and any jet is ∆R < 0.4, the muon is omitted. Events containing muons identified as originating from cosmic rays (|d0| > 0.2 mm and |z0| > 1 mm) or as poorly reconstructed (σ(q/p)/|(q/p)| > 0.2) are removed (“cosmic and bad muon” requirement). Here, d0 is the transverse impact parameter of a track with respect to the primary vertex, z0is the distance of this point from the primary vertex projected onto the z-axis, and σ(q/p)/|(q/p)| provides a measure of the momentum uncertainty for a particle with charge q.
The pmiss
T vector is the negative vector sum of the pT of all selected and calibrated electrons, muons, and jets in the event. An extra term is added to account for small energy depositions in the event that are not associated with any of the selected objects. This “soft” term is calculated from inner detector tracks with pT > 400 MeV matched to the primary vertex, to make it resilient to pile-up contamination, not associated with physics objects [76]. The missing transverse momentum from the tracking system (denoted
by pmiss,trackT , with magnitude ETmiss,track) is computed from the vector sum of the
recon-structed inner detector tracks with pT > 400 MeV, |η| < 2.5, that are associated with the primary vertex in the event. The pmiss,trackT and ETmiss,track are used to reject events with large calorimeter-based Emiss
T due to pile-up contamination or jet energy mismeasurements. 2For the overlap removal, rapidity, defined as 1
2ln
E+pz
E−pz, is used instead of pseudorapidity in the ∆R
JHEP12(2017)085
These events, where the pmiss,trackT tends to not be aligned with the pmiss
T and the ETmiss tends to be much larger than the ETmiss,track, are rejected by requiring that the ∆φ between the pmiss
T and p
miss,track
T is less than π/3 and that the E
miss,track
T > 30 GeV.
The requirements on electrons and muons are tightened for the selection of events in background control regions (described in section 7) containing leptons. Electron and muon candidates are required to have pT > 20 GeV (pT > 28 GeV) for regions using the Emiss
T (lepton) triggers and to satisfy pT-dependent track- and calorimeter-based isolation criteria. The calorimeter-based isolation is determined by taking the ratio of the sum of energy deposits in a cone of R = 0.2 around the electron or muon candidate and the energy deposits associated with the electron and muon. The track-based isolation is estimated in a similar way but using a variable cone size with a maximum value of R = 0.2 for electrons and R = 0.3 for muons. An isolation requirement is made that is 95% efficient for electron or muon candidates with pT= 25 GeV and 99% for candidates with pT = 60 GeV.
Electron candidates are required to pass a “tight” likelihood-based selection [74]. The impact parameter of the electron in the transverse plane with respect to the reconstructed event primary vertex is required to be less than five times the impact parameter uncertainty (σd0). The impact parameter along the beam direction, |z0× sin θ|, is required to be less than 0.5 mm. Further selection criteria are also imposed on reconstructed muons: muon candidates are required to pass a “medium” quality selection [77]. In addition, the requirements |d0| < 3σd0 and |z0× sin θ| < 0.5 mm are imposed for muon candidates.
6 Signal region definitions
The main experimental signature for all signal topologies is the presence of multiple jets (two of which are b-tagged), no muons or electrons, and significant missing transverse momentum.
Five sets of signal regions (SRA-E) are defined to target each topology and kinematic regime. SRA (SRB) is sensitive to production of high-mass ˜t1 pairs with large (intermedi-ate) ∆m(˜t1, ˜χ
0
1). Both SRA and SRB employ top-mass reconstruction techniques to reject background. SRC is designed for the highly compressed region with ∆m(˜t1, ˜χ01) ∼ mt. In this signal region, initial-state radiation (ISR) is used to improve sensitivity to these decays. SRD is targeted at ˜t1 → b ˜χ
±
1 decays, where no top-quark candidates are recon-structed. SRE is optimized for scenarios with highly boosted top quarks that can occur in gluino-mediated top-squark production.
A common preselection is defined for all signal regions. At least four jets are required, of which at least one must be b-tagged. The four leading jets (ordered in pT) must satisfy p0−3T > 80, 80, 40, 40 GeV due to the tendency for signal events to have more energetic jets than background. Events containing reconstructed electrons or muons are vetoed. The Emiss
T trigger threshold motivates the requirement ETmiss > 250 GeV and rejects most of the background from multijet and all-hadronic t¯t events. In order to reject events with mismeasured Emiss
T originating from multijet and hadronic t¯t decays, an angular separa-tion between the azimuthal angle of the two highest-pT jets and the pmissT is required:
∆φ jet0,1, pmiss T
JHEP12(2017)085
Events / 20 GeV 0 1000 2000 3000 Data SM Total t t Single Top +V t t W Z Diboson )=(600,300) GeV 1 0 χ ∼ , 1 t ~ 20 x ( )=(1000,1) GeV 1 0 χ ∼ , 1 t ~ 100 x ( ATLAS -1 =13 TeV, 36.1 fb s >50 GeV ,min b T m preselection + [GeV] 0 =1.2 R jet, m 0 100 200 300 400 Data / SM 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 (a) Events / 50 GeV 0 2000 4000 6000 Data SM Total t t Single Top +V t t W Z Diboson )=(600,300) GeV 1 0 χ ∼ , 1 t ~ 20 x ( )=(1000,1) GeV 1 0 χ ∼ , 1 t ~ 100 x ( ATLAS -1 =13 TeV, 36.1 fb s >50 GeV ,min b T m preselection + [GeV] ,min b T m 0 200 400 600 Data / SM 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 (b) Figure 2. Distributions of the discriminating variables (a) m0jet,R=1.2 and (b) m
b,min
T after the common preselection and an additional mb,minT > 50 GeV requirement. The stacked histograms show the SM prediction before being normalized using scale factors derived from the simultaneous fit (detailed in section 7) to all dominant backgrounds. The “Data/SM” plots show the ratio of data events to the total SM prediction. The hatched uncertainty band around the SM prediction and in the ratio plots illustrates the combination of statistical and detector-related systematic uncertainties. The rightmost bin includes overflow events.
pmiss,trackT to be aligned in φ with respect to the pmiss
T calculated from the calorimeter
system: ETmiss,track> 30 GeV and ∆φ pmissT , pmiss,trackT < π/3.
Signal regions A and B. SRA and SRB are targeted at direct top-squark pair
pro-duction where the top squarks decay via ˜t1 → t ˜χ 0
1 with ∆m(˜t1, ˜χ 0
1) > mt. SRA is opti-mized for mt˜1 = 1000 GeV and mχ˜01 = 1 GeV, while SRB is optimized for mt˜1 = 600 GeV, mχ˜0
1 = 300 GeV. At least two b-tagged jets (Nb−jet ≥ 2) are required and an additional requirement on the ∆φ of the three leading jets and pmiss
T of ∆φ jet0,1,2, pmiss T > 0.4 is made.
The decay products of the t¯t system in the all-hadronic decay mode can often be reconstructed as six distinct R = 0.4 jets. The transverse shape of these jets is typically circular with a radius equal to this radius parameter, but when two of the jets are less than 2R apart in η–φ space, the one-to-one correspondence of a jet with a top-quark daughter may no longer hold. Thus, the two hadronic top candidates are reconstructed by applying the anti-kt clustering algorithm [65] to the R = 0.4 jets, using reclustered radius parameters of R = 0.8 and R = 1.2. Two R = 1.2 reclustered jets are required; the mass of the highest-pT R = 1.2 reclustered jet is shown in figure 2(a). The events are divided into three categories based on the resulting R = 1.2 reclustered jet masses ordered in pT, as illustrated in figure 3: the “TT” category includes events with two top candidates, i.e. with masses m0
jet,R=1.2> 120 GeV and m1jet,R=1.2 > 120 GeV; the “TW” category contains
events with one top candidate and a W candidate, i.e. where m0
jet,R=1.2 > 120 GeV and
60 < m1
JHEP12(2017)085
[GeV] 0 =1.2 R jet, m 200 400 600 800 [GeV] 1 =1.2 R jet, m 0 200 400 600 800 Fraction of events 0.00 0.02 0.04ATLAS
Simulation = 13 TeV s ) = (1000,1) GeV 0 χ ∼ 1 , 1 t ~ ( TT TW T0Figure 3. Illustration of signal-region categories (TT, TW, and T0) based on the R = 1.2 reclus-tered top-candidate masses for simulated direct top-squark pair production with (m˜t1, mχ˜01) = (1000, 1) GeV after the loose preselection requirement described in the text. The black lines repre-sent the requirements on the reclustered jet masses.
candidate, i.e. where m0
jet,R=1.2 > 120 GeV and m1jet,R=1.2 < 60 GeV. Since the
signal-to-background ratio is different in each of these categories, they are optimized individually for SRA and SRB.
The most powerful discriminating variable against SM t¯t production is the Emiss
T value,
which for the signal results from the undetected ˜χ01 neutralinos. Substantial t¯t background rejection is provided by additional requirements that reject events in which one W boson decays via a charged lepton plus neutrino. The first requirement is that the transverse mass (mT) calculated from the ETmiss and the b-tagged jet with minimum distance in φ to the pmiss
T direction is above 200 GeV:
mb,minT =
q 2 pb
TETmiss1 − cos ∆φ pbT, pmissT > 200 GeV,
since its upper bound (ideally, without consideration of resolution effects) is below the top-quark mass for the t¯t background, as illustrated in figure 2(b). An additional requirement is made on the mass of the leading (in pT) R = 0.8 reclustered jet to be consistent with
a W candidate: m0
jet,R=0.8 > 60 GeV. Additionally, requirements on the stransverse mass
(mχT22) [78, 79] are made which are especially powerful in the T0 category where a χ2 method is applied to reconstruct top quarks with lower momenta where reclustering was suboptimal. The mχT22 variable is constructed from the direction and magnitude of the pmissT vector in the transverse plane as well as the direction of two top-quark candidates reconstructed using a χ2 method. The minimization in this method is done in terms of a χ2-like penalty function, χ2= (m
cand− mtrue)2/mtrue, where mcand is the candidate mass and mtrueis set to 80.4 GeV for W candidates and 173.2 GeV for top candidates. Initially, single or pairs of R = 0.4 jets form W candidates which are then combined with additional
JHEP12(2017)085
Signal Region TT TW T0
m0
jet,R=1.2 > 120 GeV
m1
jet,R=1.2 > 120 GeV [60, 120] GeV < 60 GeV
mb,minT > 200 GeV Nb−jet ≥ 2 τ -veto yes ∆φ jet0,1,2, pmiss T > 0.4 A m0 jet,R=0.8 > 60 GeV ∆R (b, b) > 1 –
mχT22 > 400 GeV > 400 GeV > 500 GeV
Emiss
T > 400 GeV > 500 GeV > 550 GeV
B m
b,max
T > 200 GeV
∆R (b, b) > 1.2
Table 1. Selection criteria for SRA and SRB, in addition to the common preselection require-ments described in the text. The signal regions are separated into topological categories based on reconstructed top-candidate masses.
b-tagged jets in the event to construct top candidates. The top candidates selected by
the χ2 method are only used for the momenta in mχ2
T2 while the mass hypotheses for
the top quarks and the invisible particles are set to 173.2 GeV and 0 GeV, respectively. Finally, a “τ -veto” requirement is applied to reject semi-hadronically decaying τ -lepton candidates likely to have originated from a W → τ ν decay. Here, events that contain a non-b-tagged jet within |η| < 2.5 with fewer than four associated charged-particle tracks with pT> 500 MeV, and where the ∆φ between the jet and the pmissT is less than π/5, are vetoed. The systematic uncertainties for this requirement are found to be negligible [25]. In SRB, additional discrimination is provided by mb,maxT and ∆R(b, b). The former quantity is analogous to mb,minT except that the transverse mass is computed with the b-tagged jet that has the largest ∆φ with respect to the pmiss
T direction. The latter quantity provides additional discrimination against background where the two jets with highest b-tagging weights originate from a gluon splitting. Table1summarizes the selection criteria that are used in these two signal regions. The categories are statistically combined within SRA and SRB to maximize the sensitivity to signal.
Signal regions C. SRC is optimized for direct top-squark pair production where
∆m(˜t1, ˜χ01) ≈ mt, a regime in which the signal topology is similar to SM t¯t production. In the presence of high-momentum ISR, which can be reconstructed as multiple jets forming an ISR system, the di-top-squark system is boosted in the transverse plane. The ratio of the Emiss
T to the pT of the ISR system in the centre-of-mass (CM) frame of the entire (ISR plus di-top-squark) system (pISR
JHEP12(2017)085
Variable SRC1 SRC2 SRC3 SRC4 SRC5 Nb−jet ≥ 1 NS b−jet ≥ 1 NS jet ≥ 5 p0,ST,b > 40 GeV mS > 300 GeV ∆φ(ISR, pmiss T ) > 3.0 pISR T > 400 GeV p4,ST > 50 GeV RISR 0.30–0.40 0.40–0.50 0.50–0.60 0.60–0.70 0.70–0.80Table 2. Selection criteria for SRC, in addition to the common preselection requirements described in the text. The signal regions are separated into windows based on ranges of RISR.
and ˜t1 masses [80,81]: RISR≡ Emiss T pISR T ∼ mχ˜01 m˜t1 .
A “recursive jigsaw reconstruction technique”, as described in ref. [82], is used to divide each event into an ISR hemisphere and a sparticle hemisphere, where the latter consists of the pair of candidate top squarks, each of which decays via a top quark and a ˜χ01. Objects are grouped together based on their proximity in the lab frame’s transverse plane by minimizing the reconstructed transverse masses of the ISR system and sparticle system simultaneously over all choices of object assignment. Kinematic variables are then defined based on this assignment of objects to either the ISR system or the sparticle system. This method is equivalent to grouping the event objects according to the axis of maximum back-to-back pT in the event’s CM frame where the pT of all accepted objects sums vectorially to zero. In events with a high-pTISR gluon, the axis of maximum back-to-back pT, also known as the thrust axis, approximates the direction of the ISR and sparticles’ back-to-back recoil. The selection criteria for this signal region are summarized in table 2. The events are divided into five windows (SRC1-5) defined by non-overlapping ranges of the recon-structed RISR, which target different top-squark and ˜χ01 masses: e.g., SRC2 is optimized for m˜t1 = 300 GeV and mχ˜0
1 = 127 GeV, and SRC4 is optimized for m˜t1 = 500 GeV and mχ˜0
1 = 327 GeV. At least five jets must be assigned to the sparticle hemisphere of the event (NS
jet), and at least one of those jets (Nb−jetS ) must be b-tagged. Transverse-momentum re-quirements on pISR
T , the highest-pT b-jet in the sparticle hemisphere (p 0,S
T,b), and the fourth-highest-pT jet in the sparticle hemisphere (p4,ST ) are applied. The transverse mass formed by the sparticle system and the Emiss
T , defined as mS, is required to be > 300 GeV. The ISR system is also required to be separated in azimuth from the pmiss
T in the CM frame;
this variable is defined as ∆φ(ISR, pmiss
T ). Similarly to the categories defined for SRA and SRB, the individual SRCs are statistically combined to improve signal sensitivity.
JHEP12(2017)085
Variable SRD-low SRD-high
∆φ jet0,1,2, pmiss T > 0.4 Nb−jet ≥2 ∆R (b, b) > 0.8 p0,bT +p1,bT > 300 GeV > 400 GeV τ -veto yes p1 T > 150 GeV p3 T > 100 GeV > 80 GeV p4 T > 60 GeV
mb,minT > 250 GeV > 350 GeV
mb,maxT > 300 GeV > 450 GeV
Table 3. Selection criteria for SRD, in addition to the common preselection requirements described in the text.
Signal regions D. SRD is optimized for direct top-squark pair production where both
top squarks decay via ˜t1→ b ˜χ ±
1 where mχ˜±
1 = 2mχ˜
0
1. In this signal region, at least five jets are required, two of which must be b-tagged. The scalar sum of the transverse momenta of the two jets with the highest b-tagging weights (p0,bT +p1,bT ) as well as the second (p1
T), fourth (p3
T), and fifth (p4T) jet transverse momenta are used for additional background rejection. Subregions SRD-low and SRD-high are optimized for m˜t1 = 400 GeV with mχ˜01 = 50 GeV, and m˜t1 = 700 GeV with mχ˜0
1 = 100 GeV, respectively. Tighter leading and sub-leading jet pT requirements are made for SRD-high, as summarized in table3.
Signal region E. SRE is designed for models which have highly boosted top quarks.
Such signatures can arise from direct pair production of high-mass top partners, or from the gluino-mediated compressed ˜t1 scenario with large ∆m(˜g, ˜t1). In this regime, reclustered jets with R = 0.8 are utilized to optimize the experimental sensitivity to these highly boosted top quarks. In this signal region, at least two jets out of the four or more required jets must be b-tagged. Additional discrimination is provided by the Emiss
T significance: Emiss
T /
√
HT, where HT is the scalar sum of the pT of all reconstructed R = 0.4 jets in an event. The selection criteria for SRE, optimized for m˜g = 1700 GeV, mt˜1 = 400 GeV, and mχ˜0
1 = 395 GeV, are summarized in table 4.
7 Background estimation
The main SM background process in SRA, SRB, SRD, and SRE is Z → ν ¯ν production in
association with heavy-flavour jets. The second most significant background is t¯t produc-tion where one W boson decays via a lepton and neutrino and the lepton (particularly a hadronically decaying τ lepton) is either not identified or is reconstructed as a jet. This process gives the major background contribution in SRC and an important background
JHEP12(2017)085
Variable SRE ∆φ jet0,1,2, pmiss T > 0.4 Nb−jet ≥2 m0 jet,R=0.8 > 120GeV m1 jet,R=0.8 > 80GeV mb,minT > 200GeV Emiss T > 550 GeV HT > 800 GeV Emiss T / √ HT > 18 √ GeVTable 4. Selection criteria for SRE in addition to the common preselection requirements described in the text.
in SRB, SRD and SRE as well. Other important background processes are W → `ν plus heavy-flavour jets, single top quark, and the irreducible background from t¯t + Z, where the Z boson decays into two neutrinos.
The main background contributions are estimated primarily from comparisons between data and simulation outside the signal regions. Control regions (CRs) are designed to enhance a particular background process, and are orthogonal to the SRs while probing a similar event topology. The CRs are used to normalize the simulation to data, but extrapolation from the CR to the SR is taken from simulation. Sufficient data are needed to avoid large statistical uncertainties in the background estimates, and the CR definitions are chosen to be kinematically as close as possible to all SRs, to minimize the systematic uncertainties associated with extrapolating the background yield from the CR to the SR. Where CR definitions are farther from the SR definition, validation regions are employed to cross-check the extrapolation. In addition, control-region selection criteria are chosen to minimize potential contamination from signal that could shadow contributions in the signal regions. The signal contamination is below 8% in all CRs for all signal points that have not been excluded by previous ATLAS searches. No significant difference in the background estimates was found between the case where only SM backgrounds were considered and when signal is included in the estimation. As the CRs are not 100% pure in the process of interest, the cross-contamination between CRs from other processes is estimated. The normalization factors and the cross-contamination are determined simultaneously for all regions using a fit described below.
Detailed CR definitions are given in tables 5, 6, and 7. They are used for the Z
(CRZs), t¯t (CRTs), W (CRW), single top (CRST), and t¯t+Z (CRTTGamma) background
estimation. The
∆φ jet0,1,2, pmiss T
and mT(`, ETmiss) requirements are designed to reduce contamination from SM multijet processes. The number of leptons (from this point on, lepton is used to mean electron or muon) is indicated by N` and the transverse momentum of the lepton is indicated by p`
T. In all one-lepton CRs, once the trigger and minimum p`T selection are applied, the lepton is treated as a non-b-tagged jet (to emulate the hadronic τ
JHEP12(2017)085
Selection CRZAB-TT-TW CRZAB-T0 CRZD CRZE
Trigger electron or muon
N` 2, opposite charge, same flavour
p` T > 28 GeV m`` [86,96]GeV Njet ≥ 4 p0 T, p1T, p2T, p3T 80, 80, 40, 40 GeV Emiss T < 50 GeV Emiss0 T > 100GeV Nb−jet ≥ 2 m0 jet,R=1.2 > 120 GeV – m1
jet,R=1.2 > 60 GeV < 60 GeV –
mb,minT 0 – > 200 GeV
mb,maxT 0 – > 200 GeV –
HT – > 500 GeV
Table 5. Selection criteria for the Z + jets control regions used to estimate the Z + jets background contributions in the signal regions.
decays in the SRs) in the computation of all jet-related variables. In the two-lepton CRZs, a lepton-pT requirement of at least 28 GeV is made to ensure the trigger selection is fully efficient. The invariant mass of the two oppositely charged leptons, denoted by m``, must be consistent with the leptons having originated from a Z boson. The transverse momenta of these leptons are then vectorially added to the pmiss
T to mimic the Z → ν ¯ν decays in the SRs, forming the quantity Emiss0
T . Quantities that depend on the ETmiss are recalculated in the CRZs using Emiss0
T and identified by the addition of a prime (e.g. m b,min0
T and m
b,max0
T ).
Requirements such as the maximum mT(`, ETmiss) and the minimum ∆R between the two highest-weight b-tagged jets and the lepton, ∆R (b, `)min, are used to enforce orthogonality between CRT, CRW, and CRST. In CRST, the requirement on the ∆R between the two highest-weight b-tagged jets, ∆R (b, b), is used to reject t¯t contamination from the control region enriched in single-top events. Finally, the normalization of the t¯t+W /Z background in the signal region, which is completely dominated by t¯t + Z(→ νν), is estimated with a t¯t + γ control region in a way similar to the method described in ref. [27]. The same lepton triggers and lepton-pT requirements are used for the t¯t + γ control region as in the CRZs. Additionally, the presence of an isolated photon with pT> 150 GeV is required and it is used to model the Z decay in the signal regions because of the similarity between the diagrams for photon and Z production. Similarly to the Z control region, the photon is used in the estimation of Emiss
JHEP12(2017)085
Selection CRTA-TT CRTA-TW CRTA-T0 CRTB-TT CRTB-TW CRTB-T0 CRTC CRTD CRTE
Trigger Emiss
T
N` 1
p`
T > 20 GeV
Njet ≥ 4 (including electron or muon)
p0 T, p1T, p2T, p3T 80, 80, 40, 40 GeV Nb−jet ≥ 2 ∆φ jet0,1, pmiss T > 0.4 ∆φ jet0,1,2, pmissT > 0.4 – > 0.4
mT(`, ETmiss) [30, 100] GeV < 100 GeV [30, 100] GeV
mb,minT > 100 GeV – > 100 GeV
∆R (b, `)min < 1.5 < 2.0 < 1.5
m0
jet,R=1.2 > 120 GeV –
m1
jet,R=1.2 > 120 GeV [60, 120] GeV < 60 GeV > 120 GeV [60, 120] GeV < 60 GeV –
m0
jet,R=0.8 > 60 GeV – > 120 GeV
m1
jet,R=0.8 – > 80 GeV
Emiss
T > 250 GeV > 300 GeV > 350 GeV > 250 GeV
∆R (b, b) > 1.0 – > 1.2 – > 0.8 –
mb,maxT – > 200 GeV – > 100 GeV –
p1 T – > 150 GeV – p3 T – > 80 GeV – p0,bT + p1,bT – > 300 GeV – NS jet – ≥ 5 – NS b-tag – ≥ 1 – pISR T – > 400 GeV – p4,ST – > 40 GeV – HT – > 500 GeV
Table 6. Selection criteria for the t¯t control regions used to estimate the t¯t background contribu-tions in the signal regions.
To estimate the Z + jets and t¯t background in the different kinematic regions of the signal regions, individual control regions are designed for all signal regions where possible. Only if the statistical power of control regions is low, are they merged to form one control region for multiple signal regions. In the case of CRST, CRW, and CRTTGamma, this results in the use of one common CR for all signal regions. Distributions from the Z + jets, t¯t, W + jets, single top, and t¯tγ control regions are shown in figure 4.
Contributions from all-hadronic t¯t and multijet production are found to be negligible. These are estimated from data using a procedure described in ref. [83]. The procedure de-termines the jet response from simulated dijet events, and then uses this response function to smear the jet response in low-Emiss
T events. The jet response is cross-checked with data where the Emiss
T can be unambiguously attributed to the mismeasurement of one of the jets. Diboson production, which is also subdominant, is estimated directly from simulation.
JHEP12(2017)085
Events / 50 GeV 1 10 2 10 Data SM Total Z t t +V t t Diboson ATLAS -1 =13 TeV, 36.1 fb s CRZAB_T0 [GeV] ’ 2 χ T2 m 200 400 600 Data / SM 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 (a) Events / 50 GeV 1 10 2 10 Data SM Total Z t t +V t t Diboson ATLAS -1 =13 TeV, 36.1 fb s CRZE [GeV] miss’ T E 0 200 400 600 800 Data / SM 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 (b) Events / 0.05 0 50 100 150 200 Data SM Total t t Single Top +V t t W Z Diboson ATLAS -1 =13 TeV, 36.1 fb s CRTC ISR R 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Data / SM 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 (c) Events / 100 GeV 1 10 2 10 3 10 Data SM Total W t t Single Top +V t t Z Diboson ATLAS -1 =13 TeV, 36.1 fb s CRW [GeV] ,max b T m 0 500 1000 1500 Data / SM 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 (d) Events / 50 GeV 1 10 2 10 Data SM Total Single Top t t +V t t W Z Diboson ATLAS -1 =13 TeV, 36.1 fb s CRST [GeV] 1 T p 0 200 400 600 Data / SM 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 (e) Events / 50 GeV 1 10 2 10 3 10 Data SM Total γ + t t W γ V+ t t Single Top +V t t Z ATLAS -1 =13 TeV, 36.1 fb s CRTTGamma [GeV] γ T p 200 400 600 800 Data / SM 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 (f ) Figure 4. Distributions of (a) mχT220 in CRZAB-T0, (b) Emiss0T in CRZE, (c) RISR in CRTC, (d) mb,maxT in CRW, (e) the transverse momentum of the second-leading-pT jet in CRST, and (f) the photon pT in CRTTGamma. The stacked histograms show the SM prediction, normalized using scale factors derived from the simultaneous fit to all backgrounds. The “Data/SM” plots show the ratio of data events to the total SM prediction. The hatched uncertainty band around the SM prediction and in the ratio plot illustrates the combination of MC statistical and detector-related systematic uncertainties. The rightmost bin includes overflow events.
JHEP12(2017)085
Selection CRW CRST CRTTGamma Trigger Emiss T electron or muon N` 1 p` T > 20 GeV > 28 GeV Nγ – 1 pγT – > 150 GeVNjet ≥ 4 (including electron or muon) ≥ 4
p0 T, p1T,p2T,p3T 80, 80, 40, 40 GeV Nb−jet 1 ≥ 2 ∆φ jet0,1, pmissT > 0.4 – mT(`, EmissT ) [30, 100] GeV – ∆R (b, `)min > 2.0 – Emiss T > 250 GeV – ∆R (b, b) – > 1.5 – m0
jet,R=1.2 < 60 GeV > 120 GeV –
mb,minT – > 200 GeV –
Table 7. Selection criteria for the common W + jets, single-top, and t¯t+γ control-region definitions.
Simultaneous fit to determine SM background. The observed numbers of events in
the various control regions are included in a binned profile likelihood fit [84] to determine the SM background estimates for Z, t¯t, W , single top, and t¯t+Z in each signal region. The normalizations of these backgrounds are determined simultaneously to best match the observed data in each control region, taking contributions from all backgrounds into account. A likelihood function is built as the product of Poisson probability density func-tions, describing the observed and expected numbers of events in the control regions [85]. This procedure takes common systematic uncertainties (discussed in section 8) between the control and signal regions and their correlations into account as they are treated as nuisance parameters in the fit and are modelled by Gaussian probability density functions. The contributions from all other background processes (dibosons and multijets) are fixed at the values expected from the simulation, using the most accurate theoretical cross sec-tions available, as described in section 4, while their uncertainties are used as nuisance parameters in the fit.
Zero-lepton VRs (VRZAB, VRZD, VRZE) are designed to validate the background estimate for Z + jets in the signal regions. No VRZ is designed for SRC due to the negligible contribution of the Z background in this region. The definitions of the VRZs, after the common zero-lepton preselection discussed in section 6 is applied, are shown in table 8. To provide orthogonality to the signal regions, the requirement on one or more of the following variables is inverted: ∆R (b, b), m0
JHEP12(2017)085
Selection VRZAB VRZD VRZE
Jet p0
T, p1T > 80, > 80 GeV > 150, > 80 GeV > 80, > 80 GeV
Njet ≥ 4 ≥ 5 ≥ 4 Nb−jet ≥ 2 τ -veto yes no mb,minT > 200 GeV m0 jet,R=1.2 < 120 GeV – ∆R (b, b) < 1.0 < 0.8 < 1.0 mb,maxT – > 200 GeV – HT – > 500 GeV Emiss T / √ HT – > 14 √ GeV m0 jet,R=0.8 – < 120 GeV
Table 8. Selection criteria for the Z validation regions used to validate the Z background estimates in the signal regions.
To validate the t¯t background, zero-lepton VRs sharing the same common preselection of the signal regions and which are close to the SRA and SRB definitions are designed for each of the categories (VRTA-TT, VRTA-TW, VRTA-T0, TT, TW, VRTB-T0). To avoid overlap with the signal regions the mb,minT requirement is inverted in all validation regions. In VRTA, SRA requirements remain unchanged except for mχT22 not being applied, 100 < mb,minT < 200 GeV, and the Emiss
T requirement being reduced by
100 GeV. For VRTB, all requirements in the VRs are the same as in the SRs except for
mb,minT , which is 100 < mb,minT < 200 GeV for VRTB-TT, 140 < mb,minT < 200 GeV for
VRTB-TW, and 160 < mb,minT < 200 GeV for VRTB-T0. For SRC, the same requirements are used when defining the validation region (VRTC) except for the looser requirements of mS > 100 GeV, p4,ST > 40 GeV and NjetS > 4. The ∆φ(ISR, pmissT ) requirement is inverted and mV/mS < 0.6, where mV is the transverse mass defined by the visible objects of the sparticle system and the Emiss
T , is applied in addition to the existing selection. The vali-dation region to validate the background estimates in SRD (VRTD) is formed by applying the following requirements: 100 < mb,minT < 200 GeV, p0,bT + p1,bT > 300 GeV, p3
T > 80 GeV, and mb,maxT > 300 GeV. All other requirements are applied exactly as in SRD-low ex-cept for the requirement on p4
T which is dropped. Finally, the validation region defined for SRE (VRTE) applies only the same requirements on the number of b-jets, m0
jet,R=0.8, and m1
jet,R=0.8, and inverts the m
b,min
T requirement to 100 < m
b,min
T < 200 GeV. No other
requirement is applied to VRTE.
A one-lepton validation region for the W + jets background (VRW) is used to test the W background estimates in all SRs. In this case the validation region is designed based on the definition of CRW. Compared to CRW, the requirement that differs is ∆R(b0,1, `)min, which is greater than 1.8 for the validation region. Two additional requirements are in-cluded in the definition of VRW, namely mb,minT > 150 GeV and m0
JHEP12(2017)085
Events 0 100 200 300 400 Data SM Total Z t t +V t t W Single Top Diboson Multijets ATLAS -1 =13 TeV, 36.1 fb sVRTA-TTVRTA-TWVRTA-T0VRTB-TTVRTB-TWVRTB-T0VRTC VRTD VRTE VRW VRZABVRZD VRZE
Data / SM 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
Figure 5. Yields for all validation regions after the likelihood fit. The stacked histograms show the SM prediction and the hatched uncertainty band around the SM prediction shows the total uncer-tainty, which consists of the MC statistical uncertainties, detector-related systematic uncertainties, and theoretical uncertainties in the extrapolation from CR to VR.
Signal contamination in all the validation regions for all considered signals that have not yet been excluded was also checked. The largest contamination found is ∼25% and occurs in the VRTs for squark masses below 350 GeV and in VRZD and VRZE near top-squark masses of 700 GeV. The result of the simultaneous fit procedure, which is repeated with the VRs used as test signal regions, for each VR is shown in figure 5, which displays agreement between data and MC predictions.
8 Systematic uncertainties
Experimental and theoretical systematic uncertainties in the SM predictions and signal predictions are included in the profile likelihood fit described in section 7.
Statistical uncertainties dominate the total uncertainties of the background predictions in all SRs except SRB. The dominant systematic uncertainties for SRA and SRB are shown in table 9 while the systematic uncertainties for the remaining SRs are shown in table 10. The uncertainties are shown as a relative uncertainty to the total background estimate. The main sources of detector-related systematic uncertainty in the SM background estimates are the jet energy scale (JES) and jet energy resolution (JER), b-tagging efficiency, Emiss
T soft term, and pile-up. The effect of the JES and JER uncertainties on the background estimates in the signal regions can reach 17%. The uncertainty in the b-tagging efficiency is nowhere more than 9%. All jet- and lepton-related uncertainties are propagated to
JHEP12(2017)085
SRA-TT SRA-TW SRA-T0 SRB-TT SRB-TW SRB-T0
Total syst. unc. 24 23 15 19 14 15
t¯t theory 10 6 3 10 11 12
t¯t+V theory 2 <1 <1 1 <1 <1
Z theory 1 3 2 <1 1 <1
Single top theory 6 3 5 3 4 5
Diboson theory <1 2 <1 <1 <1 <1 µt¯t <1 <1 <1 2 2 1 µt¯t+Z 6 3 2 4 3 2 µZ 6 10 7 5 6 4 µW 1 1 1 2 1 2 µsingle top 5 3 5 4 4 5 JER 10 12 4 3 4 3 JES 4 7 1 7 4 <1 b-tagging 1 3 2 5 4 4 Emiss T soft term 2 2 <1 1 <1 <1 Multijet estimate 1 <1 <1 2 2 <1 Pileup 10 5 5 8 1 3
Table 9. Dominant systematic uncertainties (greater than 1% for at least one SR) for SRA and SRB in percent relative to the total background estimates. The uncertainties due to the normalization from a control region for a given signal region and background are indicated by µt¯t+Z, µt¯t, µZ, µW, and µsingle top. The theory uncertainties are the total uncertainties for a given background. Additionally, the uncertainty due to the number of MC events in the background samples is shown as “MC statistical”.
the calculation of the Emiss
T , and additional uncertainties in the energy and resolution of the soft term are also included [76]. The uncertainty in the soft term of the Emiss
T is most
significant in SRC5 at 15%. An uncertainty due to the pile-up modelling is also considered, with a contribution up to 14%. Lepton reconstruction and identification uncertainties are also considered but have a small impact.
The uncertainty in the combined 2015+2016 integrated luminosity is 3.2%. It is de-rived, following a methodology similar to that detailed in ref. [86], from a preliminary calibration of the luminosity scale using x–y beam-separation scans performed in August 2015 and May 2016.
Theoretical uncertainties in the modelling of the SM background are estimated. For the W/Z + jets background processes, the modelling uncertainties are estimated using SHERPA samples by varying the renormalization and factorization scales, and the merging and resummation scales (each varied up and down by a factor of two). PDF uncertainties were found to have a negligible impact. The resulting impact on the total background yields from the Z + jets theoretical uncertainties is up to 3% while the uncertainties from the W + jets sample variations are less than 3%.
JHEP12(2017)085
SRC1 SRC2 SRC3 SRC4 SRC5 SRD-low SRD-high SRE
Total syst. unc. 31 18 18 16 80 25 18 22
t¯t theory 27 11 14 11 71 12 10 11
t¯t+V theory <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 1
Z theory <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 2
W theory <1 <1 1 3 2 <1 <1 1
Single top theory 3 2 2 3 <1 5 6 12
µt¯t 4 6 6 5 5 1 1 <1 µt¯t+Z <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 2 2 4 µZ <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 4 5 5 µW <1 <1 1 3 3 3 1 2 µsingle top 3 2 2 3 <1 5 6 6 JER 4 10 6 5 10 3 6 4 JES 4 5 2 2 17 8 4 5 b-tagging 2 2 <1 2 4 9 7 <1 Emiss T soft term 1 3 2 3 15 4 3 2 Multijet estimate 12 3 <1 <1 <1 2 2 <1 Pileup <1 1 <1 2 14 9 <1 2
Table 10. Dominant systematic uncertainties (greater than 1% for at least one SR) for SRC, SRD, and SRE in percent relative to the total background estimates. The uncertainty due to the normalization from a control region for a given signal region and background are indicated by µt¯t+Z, µt¯t, µZ, µW, and µsingle top. The theory uncertainties are the total uncertainties for a given background. Additionally, the uncertainty due to the number of MC events in the background samples is shown as “MC statistical”.
For the t¯t background, uncertainties are estimated from the comparison of different matrix-element calculations, the choice of parton-showering model and the emission of additional partons in the initial and final states (comparing Powheg-Box+PYTHIA vs
HERWIG++ and SHERPA). More details are given in ref. [55]. The largest impact of
the t¯t theory systematic uncertainties on the total background yields arises for SRC and it varies from 11% to 71% by tightening the RISR requirement. For the t¯t+W/Z background, the theoretical uncertainty is estimated through variations, in both t¯t+W/Z and t¯tγ MC simulation, including the choice of renormalization and factorization scales (each varied up and down by a factor of two), the choice of PDF, as well as a comparison between MC@NLO and OpenLoops+SHERPA generators, resulting in a maximum uncertainty of 2% in SRA-TT. The single-top background is dominated by the W t subprocess. Uncer-tainties are estimated for the choice of parton-showering model (PYTHIA vs HERWIG++) and for the emission of additional partons in the initial- and final-state radiation. A 30% uncertainty is assigned to the single-top background estimate to account for the effect of interference between single-top-quark and t¯t production. This uncertainty is estimated by comparing yields in the signal and control regions for a sample that includes resonant and non-resonant W W +bb production with the sum of the yields of resonant t¯t and single-top+b production. The final single-top uncertainty relative to the total background estimate is
JHEP12(2017)085
up to 12%. The detector systematic uncertainties are also applied to the signal samples used for interpretation. Theoretical uncertainties in the signal cross section as described in section 4 are treated separately and limits on top-squark and neutralino masses are given for the ±1σ values as well as the central cross section.
Signal systematic uncertainties due to detector and acceptance effects are taken into account. The main sources of these uncertainties are the JER, ranging from 3% to 6%, the JES, ranging from 2% to 5.7%, pile-up, ranging from 0.5% to 5.5% and from b-tagging efficiency, ranging from 3% to 5.5%. Uncertainties in the acceptance due to theoretical variations are taken into consideration. Those originate from variations of the QCD cou-pling constant αs, the variations of the renormalization and factorization scales, the CKKW matching scale at which the parton-shower description and the matrix-element description are separate and the parton-shower tune variations (each varied up and down by a factor of two). These uncertainties range across the SRs between 10% and 25% for the ˜t1 → t(∗)χ˜01 grid, the mixed grid, the non-asymptotic higgsino grid, and the ˜g → t˜t1 → t ˜χ01+soft grid. For the wino-NLSP model, they range from 15% to 20%, and for the well-tempered neutralino pMSSM model they range from 10% to 35%. Finally, the uncertainty in the estimated number of signal events which arises from the cross-section uncertainties for the various processes is taken into account by calculating two additional limits considering a ±1σ change in cross section. The cross-section uncertainty is ∼15–20% for direct top-squark production and ∼15–30% for gluino production [12–15] depending on the top-squark and gluino masses.
9 Results and interpretation
The observed event yields are compared to the expected total number of background events in tables 11, 12, 13, and figure 6. The total background estimate is determined from a simultaneous fit to all control regions, based on a procedure described in section 7 but including the corresponding signal regions as well as control regions. Figure 7 shows the distribution of Emiss
T , m
χ2
T2, m
b,max
T , mT, RISR, and HT for the various signal regions, with RISR being shown combining SRC1-5. In these distributions, the background predictions are scaled to the values determined from the simultaneous fit.
No significant excess above the SM prediction is observed in any of the signal regions. The smallest p-values, which express the probability that the background fluctuates to the data or above, are 27%, 27%, and 29% for SRB-T0, SRD-high, and SRA-TT, respectively. The largest deficit in the data can be found in SRC4 where one event is observed while 7.7 background events were expected. The 95% confidence level (CL) upper limits on the number of beyond-the-SM (BSM) events in each signal region are derived using the CLs prescription [87, 88] and calculated from asymptotic formulae [84]. Model-independent limits on the visible BSM cross sections, defined as σvis = Sobs95/RL dt, where Sobs95 is the 95% CL upper limit on the number of signal events, are reported in table 14.
The detector acceptance multiplied by the efficiency (A · ) is calculated for several signal regions and their benchmark points. The A · values for signal regions aimed at high-energy final states, SRA and SRE, are 9% and 6% for their respective signal
bench-JHEP12(2017)085
SRA-TT SRA-TW SRA-T0 SRB-TT SRB-TW SRB-T0
Observed 11 9 18 38 53 206
Fitted background events
Total SM 8.6 ± 2.1 9.3 ± 2.2 18.7 ± 2.7 39.3 ± 7.6 52.4 ± 7.4 179 ± 26 t¯t 0.71+ 0.91 − 0.71 0.51+ 0.55− 0.51 1.31 ± 0.64 7.3 ± 4.3 12.4 ± 5.9 43 ± 22 W + jets 0.82 ± 0.15 0.89 ± 0.56 2.00 ± 0.83 7.8 ± 2.8 4.8 ± 1.2 25.8 ± 8.8 Z + jets 2.5 ± 1.3 4.9 ± 1.9 9.8 ± 1.6 9.0 ± 2.8 16.8 ± 4.1 60.7 ± 9.6 t¯t+W /Z 3.16 ± 0.66 1.84 ± 0.39 2.60 ± 0.53 9.3 ± 1.7 10.8 ± 1.6 20.5 ± 3.2 Single top 1.20 ± 0.81 0.70 ± 0.42 2.9 ± 1.5 4.2 ± 2.2 5.9 ± 2.8 26 ± 13 Dibosons −− 0.35 ± 0.26 −− 0.13 ± 0.07 0.60 ± 0.43 1.04 ± 0.73 Multijets 0.21 ± 0.10 0.14 ± 0.09 0.12 ± 0.07 1.54 ± 0.64 1.01 ± 0.88 1.8 ± 1.5 Expected events before fit
Total SM 7.1 7.9 16.3 32.4 46.1 162 t¯t 0.60 0.45 1.45 6.1 12.8 47 W + jets 0.65 0.70 1.58 6.1 3.83 20.4 Z + jets 2.15 4.2 8.63 7.7 14.4 53.6 t¯t+W /Z 2.46 1.43 2.02 7.3 8.4 15.9 Single top 1.03 0.60 2.5 3.6 5.1 22.4 Dibosons −− 0.35 −− 0.13 0.60 1.03 Multijets 0.21 0.14 0.12 1.54 1.01 1.8
Table 11. Observed and expected yields, before and after the fit, for SRA and SRB. The uncertain-ties include MC statistical uncertainuncertain-ties, detector-related systematic uncertainuncertain-ties, and theoretical uncertainties in the extrapolation from CR to SR.
mark points of m˜t1 = 1000 GeV, mχ˜10 = 1 GeV, and m˜g = 1700 GeV, m˜t1 = 400 GeV, mχ˜0
1 = 395 GeV. SRB, SRD-low, and SRD-high have A · of 1.4%, 0.05%, and 0.5%
for m˜t1 = 600 GeV, mχ˜01 = 300 GeV; m˜t1 = 400 GeV, mχ˜±1 = 100 GeV, mχ˜01 = 50 GeV; and m˜t1 = 700 GeV, mχ˜±1 = 200 GeV, mχ˜01 = 100 GeV where the branching ratio, B(˜t1→ b ˜χ
±
1) = 100% is assumed for the SRD samples, respectively. Finally, SRC1-5 (com-bining the RISR windows) has an A · of 0.08% for mt˜1 = 400 GeV, mχ˜01 = 227 GeV.
The profile-likelihood-ratio test statistic is used to set limits on direct pair production of top squarks. The signal strength parameter is allowed to float in the fit [85], and any signal contamination in the CRs is taken into account. Again, limits are derived using the CLs prescription and calculated from asymptotic formulae. Orthogonal signal subregions, such as SRA-TT, SRA-TW, and SRA-T0, are statistically combined by multiplying their likelihood functions. A similar procedure is performed for the signal subregions in SRB and SRC. For the overlapping signal regions defined for SRD (SRD-low and SRD-high), the signal region with the smallest expected CLs value is chosen for each signal model. Once the signal subregions are combined or chosen, the signal region with the smallest expected CLs is chosen for each signal model in the ˜t1– ˜χ01 signal grid. The nominal event yield in each SR is set to the mean background expectation to determine the expected limits; contours that correspond to ±1σ uncertainties in the background estimates (σexp) are also
JHEP12(2017)085
SRC1 SRC2 SRC3 SRC4 SRC5
Observed 20 22 22 1 0
Fitted background events
Total SM 20.6 ± 6.5 27.6 ± 4.9 18.9 ± 3.4 7.7 ± 1.2 0.91 ± 0.73 t¯t 12.9 ± 5.9 22.1 ± 4.3 14.6 ± 3.2 4.91 ± 0.97 0.63+ 0.70− 0.63 W + jets 0.80 ± 0.37 1.93 ± 0.49 1.91 ± 0.62 1.93 ± 0.46 0.21 ± 0.12 Z + jets −− −− −− −− −− t¯t+W /Z 0.29 ± 0.16 0.59 ± 0.38 0.56 ± 0.31 0.08 ± 0.08 0.06 ± 0.02 Single top 1.7 ± 1.3 1.2 + 1.4 − 1.2 1.22 ± 0.69 0.72 ± 0.37 −− Dibosons 0.39 ± 0.33 0.21+ 0.23− 0.21 0.28 ± 0.18 −− −− Multijets 4.6 ± 2.4 1.58 ± 0.77 0.32 ± 0.17 0.04 ± 0.02 −−
Expected events before fit
Total SM 25.4 36.0 24.2 9.2 1.1 t¯t 18.2 31.2 20.6 7.0 0.89 W + jets 0.64 1.53 1.51 1.53 0.17 Z + jets −− −− −− −− −− t¯t+W /Z 0.22 0.46 0.44 0.07 0.05 Single top 1.44 1.0 1.04 0.62 −− Dibosons 0.39 0.21 0.28 −− −− Multijets 4.6 1.58 0.32 0.04 −−
Table 12. Observed and expected yields, before and after the fit. The uncertainties include MC statistical uncertainties, detector-related systematic uncertainties, and theoretical uncertainties in the extrapolation from CR to SR.
evaluated. The observed event yields determine the observed limits for each SR; these are evaluated for the nominal signal cross sections as well as for ±1σ theory uncertainties in those cross sections, denoted by σSUSY
theory.
Figure 8 shows the observed (solid red line) and expected (solid blue line) exclusion contours at 95% CL in the ˜t1– ˜χ01 mass plane for 36.1 fb−1. The data excludes top-squark masses between 450 and 1000 GeV for ˜χ01 masses below 160 GeV, extending Run-1 limits from the combination of zero- and one-lepton channels by 260 GeV. Additional constraints are set in the case where m˜t1 ≈ mt + mχ˜01, for which top-squark masses in the range 235−590 GeV are excluded. The limits in this region of the exclusion are new compared to the 8 TeV results and come from the inclusion of SRC, which takes advantage of an ISR system to discriminate between signal and the dominant t¯t background.
For signal models also considering top-squark decays into b ˜χ±1 or into additional mas-sive neutralinos, four interpretations are considered:
JHEP12(2017)085
SRD-low SRD-high SRE
Observed 27 11 3
Fitted background events
Total SM 25.1 ± 6.2 8.5 ± 1.5 3.64 ± 0.79 t¯t 3.3 ± 3.3 0.98 ± 0.88 0.21+ 0.39− 0.21 W + jets 6.1 ± 2.9 1.06 ± 0.34 0.52 ± 0.27 Z + jets 6.9 ± 1.5 3.21 ± 0.62 1.36 ± 0.25 t¯t+W /Z 3.94 ± 0.85 1.37 ± 0.32 0.89 ± 0.19 Single top 3.8 ± 2.1 1.51 ± 0.74 0.66 ± 0.49 Dibosons −− −− −− Multijets 1.12 ± 0.37 0.40 ± 0.15 −−
Expected events before fit
Total SM 22.4 7.7 3.02 t¯t 3.4 1.04 0.21 W + jets 4.8 0.84 0.42 Z + jets 6.7 3.10 1.15 t¯t+W /Z 3.06 1.07 0.69 Single top 3.3 1.30 0.56 Dibosons −− −− −− Multijets 1.12 0.40 −−
Table 13. Observed and expected yields, before and after the fit, for SRD and SRE. The uncertain-ties include MC statistical uncertainuncertain-ties, detector-related systematic uncetainuncertain-ties, and theoretical uncertainties in the extrapolation from CR to SR.
Natural SUSY-inspired mixed grid: a simplified model [89] where mχ˜±
1 = mχ˜
0
1+1 GeV with only two decay modes, ˜t1 → b ˜χ
±
1 and ˜t1 → t ˜χ01, and only on-shell top-quark de-cays are considered. The same maximal mixing between the partners of the left- and right-handed top quarks and nature of the ˜χ01(pure bino) as for the B(˜t1→ t ˜χ01)=100% case is assumed. The branching ratio to ˜t1 → t ˜χ01 is set to 0%, 25%, 50%, and 75% and yield the limits shown in figure9.
Non-asymptotic higgsino: a pMSSM-inspired simplified model with a higgsino LSP,
mχ˜±
1 = mχ˜
0
1 + 5 GeV, and mχ˜02 = mχ˜01 + 10 GeV, assumes three sets of branching ra-tios for the considered decays of ˜t1→ t ˜χ02, ˜t1 → t ˜χ01, ˜t1→ b ˜χ
±
1 [89]. A set of branching ratios with B(˜t1 → t ˜χ02, ˜t1→ t ˜χ01, ˜t1→ b ˜χ
±
1) = 33%, 33%, 33% is considered, which is equivalent to a pMSSM model with the lightest top squark mostly consisting of the superpartner of left-handed top quark and tanβ = 60 (ratio of vacuum expectation values of the two Higgs doublets). Additionally, B(˜t1 → t ˜χ02, ˜t1 → t ˜χ01, ˜t1 → b ˜χ
± 1) = 45%, 10%, 45% and B(˜t1 → t ˜χ02, ˜t1 → t ˜χ01, ˜t1 → b ˜χ
±
1) = 25%, 50%, 25% are
JHEP12(2017)085
SRD-high Events 1 10 2 10 3 10 Data SM Total Z t t +V t t W Single Top Diboson Multijets ATLAS -1 =13 TeV, 36.1 fb sSRA-TTSRA-TWSRA-T0SRB-TTSRB-TWSRB-T0SRC1 SRC2 SRC3 SRC4 SRC5 SRD-lowSRD-highSRE
Data / SM 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
Figure 6. Yields for all signal regions after the likelihood fit. The stacked histograms show the SM prediction and the hatched uncertainty band around the SM predicttion shows total uncertainty, which consists of the MC statistical uncertainties, detector-related systematic uncertainties, and theoretical uncertainties in the extrapolation from CR to SR.
of tanβ) and m˜tR < mqL3˜ with tanβ = 20, respectively. Here mqL3˜ represents the left-handed third-generation mass parameter and m˜tR is the mass parameter of the superpartner to the right-handed top-quark. Limits in the m˜t1 and mχ˜01 plane are shown in figure10.
Wino-NLSP pMSSM: a pMSSM model where the LSP is bino-like and has mass M1
and where the NLSP is wino-like with mass M2, while M2 = 2M1 and m˜t1 > M1 [89]. Limits are set for both positive and negative µ (the higgsino mass parameter) as a function of the ˜t1 and ˜χ01 masses which can be translated to different M1 and mqL3˜ , and are shown in figure11. Only bottom and top-squark production are considered in this interpretation. Allowed decays in the top-squark production scenario are ˜
t1 → t ˜χ02 → h/Z ˜χ01, at a maximum branching ratio of 33%, and ˜t1→ b ˜χ ±
1. Whether the ˜χ02 dominantly decays into a h or Z is determined by the sign of µ. Along the diagonal region, the ˜t1 → t ˜χ01 decay with 100% branching ratio is also considered. The equivalent decays in bottom-squark production are ˜b → t ˜χ±1 and ˜b → b ˜χ02. The remaining pMSSM parameters have the following values: M3= 2.2 TeV (gluino mass parameter), MS=√m˜t1m˜t2 = 1.2 TeV (geometric mean of top-squark masses), Xt/MS =
√
6 (mixing parameter between the superpartners of left- and right-handed states, where Xt = At− µ/tanβ and At is the trilinear coupling parameter in the top-quark sector), and tanβ = 20. All other pMSSM masses are set to >3 TeV.
