• Sonuç bulunamadı

Relations between ranks of certain semigroups

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Relations between ranks of certain semigroups"

Copied!
4
0
0

Yükleniyor.... (view fulltext now)

Tam metin

(1)

Selçuk J. Appl. Math. Selçuk Journal of Vol. 12. No. 1. pp. 123-126, 2011 Applied Mathematics

Relations between Ranks of Certain Semigroups Fikret Kuyucu

Çukurova University, Faculty of Arts and Science, Department of Mathematics 01330 Adana, Turkiye

e-mail: fkuyucu@ cukurova.edu.tr

Received Date: May 17, 2010 Accepted Date: September 1, 2010

Abstract. Let  be a finite semigroup and let  be an aquivalence relation on  such that  is a congruence. Then  is a subsemigroup of  × , the direct product of semigroups, and  = { :  ∈ } is a semigroup with ()() = (). In [2,3] Howie and Ribeiro study the small, lower, intermediate, upper and large rank of a finite semigroups . In this paper, we investigate some relation among ranks of semigroups ,  and .

Key words: Ranks; rank properties; finite semigroups 2000 Mathematics Subject Classification. 20M10. 1.Introduction

The notion of ’rank’ or ’dimension’, belongs primarily to linear algebra. One can define the rank of a (finite-dimensional) vector space  either as cardinality of maximal linearly independent subset of  , or as the cardinality of a minimal generating set of  , and it is an elementary result in linear algebra that these two cardinalities are equal.

In [2,3], Howie and Ribeiro extend these ideas to more general algebraic struc-tures, such as semigroups.

For a set , |  | denotes the cardinality of .

If  is a semigroup and  ⊆  then hi is a subsemigroup of  generated by elements of .

Let  be a finite semigroup. A subset  ⊆  is called independent if, for every  ∈ ,  ∈ h \ {}i. From a study of rank, in the context of universal algebra, by Marczewski [4], we get the following definitions of rank for a semigroup by Howie and Ribeiro [3].

r1(S) =max{ : every subset  of  of cardinality  is independent}

r2(S) =min{ : there exists a subset  of  of cardinality  such that 

generates }

(2)

r3(S) =max{ : there exists a subset  of  of cardinality  which is

independent and which generates }

r4(S) =max{ : there exists a subset  of  of cardinality  which is

independent}

r5(S) =min{ : every subset  of  of cardinality  generates }.

It is easly seen that 1() ≤ 2() ≤ 3() ≤ 4() ≤ 5(). Also, it can be use

terminology as follows: 1() :   2() :   3() :   4() :   5() :  

Here, 2() is the ”classical” study of rank of semigroups and groups, extensively

studied. In [2,3], Howie and Ribeiro were devoted to the study of the ranks of the certain standart semigroups.

Does an arbitrary finite semigoup  satisfy 2() = 4() ? The answer is

no. For example, if Z6 = {0 1 2 3 4 5} is the cyclic group of order 6 under

addition, then evidently 2(Z6) = 1, but the set {2 5} is independent, and in

fact 4(Z6) = 2.

Let  be a finite semigroup and let  be an equivalence relation on . Then  is called a congruence if  and  then  for all     ∈ . It is clear that if  is a congruence on  then  is a subsemigroup of  × , the direct product of semigroups. Let  = { :  ∈ }, where  = { ∈  : }. If  is a congruence on  then  is a semigroup with ()() = (). In this paper, we investigate some relation among ranks of semigroups ,  and . 2. Main Results

If  is a finite semigroup and 2() =|  | then  is said to be royal. Also if 

is a semigroup such that 2=  for every  ∈  then  is called a band.

Theorem 1. Let  be a finite semigroup with |  | ≥ 2 and let  be a congruence on  with |  | ≥ 2 and |  |≥ 2.

(i) If  is not a royal semigroup then 1() = 1() = 1().

(ii) If  is a royal semigroup then 1() =|  | and 1() = |  |.

Proof. (i)Let 1() = . Then  is equal one of 1, 2 by [3, theorem 2].

Let 1() = 1. Firstly we show that 1() = 1. Since 1() = 1, there exists a

 ⊆  such that |  |= 2 and  is not independent Then  = {(1 1) (2

2)} ⊆  and (2 2) ∈ h(1 1)i. Therefore there exists an  ∈ N such that

(1 1) = (1 1) = (2 2). Then 2∈ h1i. Therefore  = {1 2} is not

an independent subset of . Thus 1() = 1.

Secondly we show that 1() = 1. Suppose that 1()  1. Then  is

independent for every  subset of  such that |  |= 2 . We take  = {1,

(3)

2}. Then there exist 1 2 ∈  such that (1 1), (2 2) ∈ . Thus (1

1) ∈ h(2 2)i since 1() = 1. Then 1 = 2 since 1 = 2. Therefore

1 ∈ h 2i and  = {1, 2} is not independent. This is a contradiction.

Thus 1() = 1.

Let 1() = 2. Then, for every ,  ∈ , {( ) ( )} ⊆  is independent.

Thus ( ) ∈ h( )i. Therefore ( ) 6= ( ) for every  ∈ N. Then

 ∈ hi. Similary  ∈ hi. Thus { } is an independent subset of . Then 1() ≥ 2. Since 1() = 2, there exist (1 1), (2 2), (3 3) ∈  such

that {(1 1) (2 2) (3 3)} is not independent subset of . Assume that

(1 1) ∈ h{(2 2), (3 3)}i. Then

(1 1) = (1 1)( ) = (1 1), where  ∈ {2 3}

Therefore 1∈ h{2 3}i since 1= 1.Thus {1 2 3} is not

indepen-dent subset of . Then 1() ≤ 2. Therefore 1() = 2.

Secondly we show that 1() = 2. Since 1() = 2 and  is not a royal

semigroup,  is a band by [3, theorem 2]. Let  ∈  for  ∈ . Since (2

2) = ( ) for ( ) ∈ , 2= . Therefore  = 2. Thus  is a band.

Then 1() = 2 since  is not royal semigroup.

(ii)Let  be a royal semigroup. Then 1() =|  | by [3, theorem 2].

Firstly we show that 1() =|  |. Suppose that 1() 6=|  |. Then there exists

an 0 ∈  such that 0 ∈ h \ {0}i. Therefore there exist  ∈  \ {0} for

 = 1 2   such that 0= 12. Then (1 1)(2 2)( ) = (0

0) ∈ . Therefore (0 0) ∈ h \ {(0 0)}i. Then 1() |  |. This is a

contradiction. Thus 1() =|  |.

Secondly we show that 1() =|  |. Suppose that 1() 6=|  |. Then

there exists an 0 ∈  such that 0 ∈ h \ {0}i. Therefore there

exist 1 2   ∈  \ {0} such that 0 = 1 = 1. Since

0 1   ∈ , then there exist 0 1   ∈  such that (0 0),

(1 1), , ( ) ∈ . Let  = 12,  = 12. Then (1 1)(2

2)( ) = ( ). Since  is compactible, then ( ) ∈ . Therefore

{( ) (1 1)  ( )} is not independent subset of . Then 1() |  |.

This is a contradiction. Thus 1() =|  |.

Theorem 2. Let  be a finite semigoup with |  | ≥ 2 and let  be a congruence on  with |  | ≥ 2 and |  |≥ 2. If  =  or  then ( ) ≤ () for

 = 2 3 4 5 In general there is not equal.

Proof. Assume that  =  and  = 2. If 2() =  then there exist

a subset  = {(1 1) (2 2)  ( )} of  such that hi = . Let

 = {1 2  } and  ∈  for a  ∈ . Since ( ) ∈  and hi = ,

there exists a {(1 1)  ( )} ⊆  such that

( ) = (1 1)( ) = (1 1).

Then  = (1) = 1. Therefore hi = . But, even if  6= 

it can be  = . Then |  |≤ . Thus 2() ≤ 2().

(4)

Similary, it can be shown that ( ) ≤ () for  = 3 4 5

In general, there is not equal. For example, we consider  = {1 2 3 4} which is the chain of order 4, and the congruence  generated by {(2 3)} as a congruence. Then  = {(1 1) , (2 2) , (3 3) , (4 4) , (2 3) , (3 2)} and  = {1, 2, 4}. Then 2() = 5 and 2() = 3. Therefore  is a band yet not royal, but

 is royal. Then 1() = 2 and 1() = 3. Also it is easly seen that

3() = 4() = 5() = 3 and 3() = 4() = 5 and 2() = 6.

An element  of a semigroup  is said to irreducible if there do not exist elements   in  \ {} such that  = .

Corollary 1. Let  be a finite semigroup and  a congruence on . If 5() =

|  | then 5() =|  |.

Proof. If 5() =|  | then  contains an irreducible element by [3, Corollary

4]. If  ∈  is an irreducible element then clearly ( ) ∈  is an irreducible element too. Thus 5() =|  | by [3, Corollary 4].

References

1. Howie, J.M. Foundations of Semigroup Theory, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1995. 2. Howie, J.M. and Ribeiro,M.I.M. Rank Properties in Finite Semigroups, Communi-cation in Algebra., 27(11), 1999, 5333- 5347.

3. Howie, J.M. and Ribeiro, M.I.M. Rank Properties in Finite Semigroups II: The Small Rank and the Large Rank, Southeast Asian Bulletin of Math., 24, 2000, 231-237.

4. Marczewski, E. Independence in abstract algebras: Results and problems, Colloq. Math. 14(1966), 169-188.

Referanslar

Benzer Belgeler

The YDFA serves both as a potential optical seed (synchronization) source for most Nd and Yb amplifi- ers operating around 1 ␮ m and as a driver source for the DFG OPA that produces

The mosaic structures parameters (such as lateral and vertical coherence lengths, tilt and twist angle and heterogeneous strain) and disloca- tion densities (edge and

Abstract: A control algorithm based on switching robust controllers is presented for a Linear Parameter Varying (LPV) time-delay system modeling automatic infusion of vasodilator

By analyzing the Turkish-Israeli alliance through a longitudinal comparative case study comparing system level and state level variables in the 1990s and in the

We contribute to the existing lit­ erature in this area by (1) explicitly controlling for the effects of one type of diver­ sification (i.e., geographic or business segment)

Objective: Objective of this study was to investigate the correlation between P wave dispersion and left ventricular diastolic function, which are associated with the

As well as the sympathy we have for others’ physical sufferings which is defined by Grouchy as the sympathy we are naturally inclined to show because the physical suffering is

Kontrol grubuna başarı ön testi ve Yaratıcılık ölçeği, Fen ve Teknoloji dersine yönelik tutum ölçeği, Fen ve Teknoloji akademik benlik kavramı ölçeği uygulandıktan