• Sonuç bulunamadı

Determination of genus of normal subgroups of discrete groups

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Determination of genus of normal subgroups of discrete groups"

Copied!
5
0
0

Yükleniyor.... (view fulltext now)

Tam metin

(1)

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/253692061

Determination of Genus of Normal Subgroups of Discrete Groups

Article · September 2010 DOI: 10.1063/1.3497859 CITATIONS 0 READS 30 5 authors, including:

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Studies in Some Algebraic and Topological Properties of Graphs View project

4th International Conference on Combinatorics, Cryptography, Computer Science and ComputationView project Ismail naci Cangul

Uludag University 170 PUBLICATIONS   1,566 CITATIONS    SEE PROFILE Musa Demirci Uludag University 33 PUBLICATIONS   66 CITATIONS    SEE PROFILE Aysun Yurttas Uludag University 18 PUBLICATIONS   91 CITATIONS    SEE PROFILE

Eylem Guzel Karpuz

Karamanoglu Mehmetbey Üniversitesi 47 PUBLICATIONS   81 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE

(2)

Determination of Genus of Normal Subgroups of Discrete

Groups

˙Ismail Naci Cangül

1∗

, Musa Demirci

2∗

, Aysun Yurtta¸s

3∗

, Eylem G. Karpuz

4†

and Firat

Ate¸s

5†

Uludag University, Faculty of Science, Department of Mathematics Bursa, TurkeyUniversity of Balikesir, Dept. of Mathematics, Balikesir, Turkey

Abstract. In this work, subgroups of a special class of discrete subgroups of PLS(2,R), namely the ones of the first kind

with genus 0, have been studied. We establish a technique to compute the genus of these subgroups in terms of the genus of easier groups. The method established here can be used for triangle groups, surface groups and Hecke groups (including the well-known modular group).

Keywords: Hecke groups, permutation method, Fuchsian group, signature, Riemann surface. PACS: 2010 MSC: 11F06, 20H10, 30F35.

INTRODUCTION

In this work, we consider an important class of discrete groups, namely those of the first kind with genus 0. A discrete groupΓ is of the first kind iff its limit set is R. These might be classified into three classes:

(i) Those with elliptic elements but parabolics, (ii) Those with parabolic elements but elliptics, (iii) Those with both elliptics and parabolics.

Some examples of those are the triangle groups, surface groups and Hecke groups (including the well-known modular group), respectively.

If one defines μ(Γ) = 2g − 2 +

r i=1  1− 1 mi  +t,

where g is the genus of the underlying Riemann surface, t is the parabolic class number and miare the periods ofΓ,

then 2π.μ(Γ) is the hyperbolic area of a fundamental region of the group. Let Γ1be a subgroup ofΓ of finite index.

Then

[Γ : Γ1] = μ(Γ 1)

μ(Γ)

is known as the Riemann-Hurwitz formula (RHF).

Now letΘ be an epimorphism between two such groups: Θ : Γ −→ Δ.

LetΛ be a subgroup of Δ having genus g. We are interested in finding the genus of the inverse image group Θ−1(Λ) ofΛ in terms of g. The group Δ is usually “simpler” than Γ. Therefore by means of the RHF, it is easier to find the

1 cangul@uludag.edu.tr 2 mdemirci@uludag.edu.tr 3 ayurttas@uludag.edu.tr 4 eguzel@balikesir.edu.tr 5 firat@balikesir.edu.tr 1148

CP1281, ICNAAM, Numerical Analysis and Applied Mathematics, International Conference 2010 edited by T. E. Simos, G. Psihoyios, and Ch. Tsitouras

(3)

genus g ofΛ rather than the genus, say g, of any subgroup ofΓ. For this reason, we shall use the inverse image of Λ and hence g.

To use the RHF, one needs to know the periods of Λ and Θ−1(Λ). One way of doing this is to make use of a result of D. Singerman, [4]. The original form of this theorem applies to all Fuchsian groups, but here, as we noted earlier, we restrict ourselves to the ones of the first kind. It is sometimes convenient to consider the parabolic elements as elliptic elements of infinite order. So we can assume that a groupΓ2has signature(g;m1,...,mr,mr+1,...,mr+t)

where mr+1= ··· = mr+t= ∞

CALCULATIONS

Let nowΓ1be a subgroup ofΓ2of finite indexμ. Let vibe the exponent of ximoduloΓ1, i.e. the least integer such

that xvi

i ∈ Γ1, (Here xi denotes the generator of order mi). It follows that vi< ∞ and vi|mi if mi< ∞. Some of the

xi’s inΓ2may have exponent mimoduloΓ1. Rearranging the periods so that vi= mionly for 1≤ i ≤ p and xi+phas

exponent ni< mi+potherwise, we find that the signature ofΓ2can be rewritten as(g;m1,...,mp,n1k1,...,nqkq) where

p+ q = r +t and 1 < ki≤ ∞. Then Singerman’s result can be deduced to the following form:

Theorem 1 LetΓ1be a subgroup ofΓ2of finite indexμ. ThenΓ1has signature

(g1; k1(μ/n1),...,kq(μ/nq))

where k(μ/ni)

i means that the period kioccursμ/nitimes. Here g1can be found by the RHF.

By means of Theorem 1, we can find the periods of bothΛ and Θ−1(Λ). Then it is easy to find gin terms of g. In fact we obtain the following main result of this work:

Theorem 2 LetΘ be the homomorphism between Γ and Δ, two discrete groups of the first kind, defined as above.

Then the genus g of a subgroupΛ of Δ is equal to the genus gofΘ−1(Λ); i.e. Θ−1preserves the genus.

Proof We prove this result in three cases. All other cases can be reduced to one of those. Case 1. Let

Θ : Γ = (0;m1,...,mr) −→ Δ = (0;n1,...,nr)

be a homomorphism for mi≥ 2, nj≥ 1, so that ni|mifor every i. LetΛ be a subgroup of Δ of genus g. Then Θ−1(Λ)

is a subgroup ofΓ with genus g, as well, i.e. Θ−1preserves the genus.LetΘ−1(Λ) have genus g, and let y1,...,yrbe

the generators ofΓ. Then

Θ(yi) = (vi1)(vi2)...(viαi) such that αi

j=1 vi j= k

for 1≤ i ≤ r, where k = [Δ : Λ] and (vi j) denotes a cycle of length vi jin the permutation representation ofΘ(yi). Since

Θ is an epimorphism, we also have k =Γ : Θ−1(Λ). The periods ofΛ are

n1 v11,..., n1 v1α1 ,..., nr vr1,..., nr vrαr and the periods ofΘ−1(Λ) are

m1 v11,..., m1 v1α1 ,...,mr vr1,..., mr vrαr .

(4)

Hence by the Riemann-Hurwitz Formula, 2g− 2 + r

i=1 αi

j=1  1−vi j ni  = k  −2 +

r i=1  1−1 ni  and 2g− 2 + r

i=1 αi

j=1  1−vi j mi  = k  −2 +

r i=1  1− 1 mi  . Now g= giff k  −2 +

r i=1  1− 1 ni  −

r i=1 αi

j=1  1−vi j ni  = k  −2 +

r i=1  1− 1 mi  −

r i=1 αi

j=1  1−vi j mi  iff −k

r i=1 1 ni+ r

i=1 αi

j=1 vi j ni = −k r

i=1 1 mi+ r

i=1 αi

j=1 vi j mi iff −k

r i=1 1 ni+ k r

i=1 1 ni = −k r

i=1 1 mi+ k r

i=1 1 mi since∑αi

j=1vi j= k. Therefore for every k, g = g.

Case 2. For mi≥ 2, nj≥ 1, so that for every i, nj|mi, let

Θ : Γ = (0;m1,...,mr,∞(t)) −→ Δ = (0;n1,...,nr,nr+1,...,nr+s,∞(t−s))

be a homomorphism. LetΛ be a subgroup of Δ with genus g. Then Θ−1(Λ) is a subgroup of Γ with genus g as well. Let nowΘ−1(Λ) have genus g. Then with the notation of Case 1,

Θ(yi) = (vi1)...(viα), f or 1≤ i ≤ r

Θ(yr+i) = (vr+i,1)...(vr+i,α), f or 1≤ i ≤ s

Θ(yr+i) = (vr+i,1)...(vr+i,α), f or s + 1 ≤ i ≤ t

. Then the periods ofΛ are

n1 v11,..., nr vrαr , nr+1 vr+1,1,..., nr+1 vr+1,αr+1 ,..., nr+s vr+s,1,..., nr+s vr+s,αr+s ,...,∞(αr+s+1),...,∞r+t)

and the periods ofΘ−1(Λ) are

m1 v11,..., m1 v1α1 ,...,mr vr1,..., mr vrαr ,∞(αr+1),...,∞(αr+t).

Hence as in the proof of Case 1, we have g= gfor every index k.

Case 3. Let mi≥ 2, nj≥ 1 and ni|mifor 1≤ i ≤ r. Let

Θ : Γ = (0;m1,...,mr,∞(t)) −→ Δ = (0;n1,...,nr+t)

be a homomorphism. Proceeding similar to the first two cases, we obtain the required result.

Therefore we have completed the discussion of all three cases. All other cases can be reduced to one of these, e.g. if Θ : (0;m1,...,mr,∞(t)) −→ (0;n1,...,ns,∞(t)),

(5)

this can be considered as a special case of Case 2 with s= 0. If Θ : (0;∞(t)) −→ (0;n

1,...,ns,∞(t−s)), 0 ≤ s ≤ t

this also can be considered as a special case of Case 2 with r= 0. This completes the proof of Theorem 2.

Some restricted applications of Theorem 2 has been done in the special case of Hecke groups H(λq) in [1]. These

are the discrete subgroups of PSL(2,R) of the first kind having signature (0;2,q,∞) for q ∈ Z, q ≥ 3. Therefore they fall into the class (iii) in our classification. In [1] and [3], a classification of some normal subgroups of Hq) has been

done and this technique was often used to establish information about them.

As an example let us consider the homomorphism from H(λq) to (2,q,2q), for odd q, taking the generator R of

order 2 of Hq) to the generator r of order 2, and the generator S of order q to the generator s of order q. This is an

infinite image of H(λq), for odd q. If we take the subgroup Λ of (2,q,2q) having the relations r2= sq= rsrs−1= 1,

thenΛ has the signature 

q−1

2 ;∞

by the RHF. HenceΘ−1(Λ) has genus q−12 and also the same signature. Note that this gives us the commutator subgroupΘ−1(Λ) = H(λq) of H(λq). When q is even, by mapping H(λq) to (2,q,q)

and applying the same method we can obtain the commutator subgroup with signature(q2− 1;∞,∞). Note that H(λq)

is therefore isomorphic to a free group of rank q− 1, [2].

Acknowledgement: This paper is supported by the Scientific Research Fund of Uludag University, Project nos:

2006-40, 2008-31 and 2008-54.

REFERENCES

1. CANGUL, I. N., Normal Subgroups of Hecke Groups, PhD Thesis, Southampton, 1994

2. CANGUL, I. N., Determining Isomorphism Class of a Fuchsian Group from its Signature, Academia Sinica, 29 (2001),313 − 316

3. CANGUL, I. N. & SINGERMAN, D., Normal Subgroups of Hecke Groups and Regular Maps, Math. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc., 123(1998),59 − 74

4. SINGERMAN, D., Subgroups of Fuchsian Groups and Finite Permutation Groups, Bull. LMS, 2(1970),319 − 323

Referanslar

Benzer Belgeler

Aşama-Veri Toplama: Eylül ve Mayıs (Haziran) ayları arasında hem müfettiş hem müdür, okul müdürünün önceden saptanan hedefler açı­ sından sağladığı başarı

Abstract —In terms of the Blonder–Tinkham–Klapwjik theory, the differential conductivity of Ho(NiB) 2 C/Ag point contacts is explained by the coexistence of magnetic ordering

This view can be considered as an objection to the assumption that students will “just acquire reading” (Grabe in Dubin, Eskey &amp; Grabe, p.37) in the course o f the

The polymer spin coated films were exposed to volatile organic vapors in order to characterize their sensing properties by surface plasmon resonance as a function of time.. The

The same is true of Turkish academics who, more or less, have adopted the official Armenian discourse, but have nothing to say about the millions of Muslims who died in this war and

Yapılan analizler sonucunda üniversite öğrencilerinin anne-baba yaĢam durumu değiĢkenine göre öğrencilerin yaĢam amaçları ölçeğinin içsel amaç alt

Kariyer yolu olarak da anılan kariyer patikası kavramı, bireylerin ilerleyen zamanlarda iş ile ilgili sorumluluklarını ve ilerlemelerini karşılamak amacıyla bireysel

Bu çerçevede Saruhan (Manisa) Sancağı’nda 1912 seçimlerinde İttihat ve Terakki Fırkası’ndan mebus adayı olan Yusuf Rıza Bey, genelde yaşanan siyasal kavga