KYUNGPOOK Math. J. 54(2014), 545-554 http://dx.doi.Org/10.5666/KMJ.2014.54.4.545
O n a N e w O str o w sk i-T y p e In e q u a lity a n d R e la te d R e su lts
Er h a n Se t*
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science and Arts, Ordu University, Ordu, Turkey
e-mail : erliaxiset@yahoo.com
Me h m e t Ze k i Sa r ik a y a
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science and Arts, Diizce University, Diizce, Turkey
e-m ail: sarikayamz@gmail.com
Ab s t r a c t. We provide a new Ostrowski-type inequality involving functions of two inde pendent variables, as well as some related results.
1. Introduction
The well-known Ostrowski inequality (see [3]) states that
(
1)
/(*)1
b — a
1
4 ( b - a f (b - a) M,
where / : [a, 6] —> M. is a differentiable function such that \f'\ < M for all x e [a, b]. This article is greatly motivated and inspired also by the following results.
Theorem l.([l]) Let I C R be an open interval, a,b 6 I ,a < b. f : I -> R is a differentiable function such that there exist constants 7, T G R with 7 < f' {x) <
T , x e [a,b\. Then we have
(
2
)
(x — b) f (6) - (x - a) f (a) 2 [b - a) < (x — a) 2 + (6 — x) 2 _ —W ^ )
— ( 7) * Corresponding Author.Received Noverber 4, 2011; accepted May 8, 2013. 2010 Mathematics Subject Classification: 26D15; 26A51.
Key words and phrases: Ostrowski inequality, Functions of two independent variables.
546 Erhan Set and Mehmet Zeki Sankaya
for all x £ [a, 6].
T h e o r e m 2.([10]) Let f : [a, b] —► R be a twice differentiable mapping on (a,b) and suppose that7 < f " ( t ) < F for all t £ (a, b ). Then we have the double inequality
- f
f ( t ) d t < ^ - J - ( b - a fa J a 24
(3)
where S = b — a
T h e o r e m 3.([2]) Under the assumptions of Theorem 2, we have
r
(.x - a) 3 + (6 - a; ) 3 1 2 (6 — a) +8
b — a + a + b (4) < - / ( 2O + (x - a)f{a) + (6 - x)f(b) < 7 b — a 3 , / . \ 3 ‘ b — aOs-
r)
[ f {t)dt J a (x — a) + (6 — x)" 1 - + ~ b — a + x —a + b(s-
7
) , 12(6- a )for all x £ [a,
6]
, where S = ^ ^ •T h e o rem 4.([7]) Let f : [a, 6] x [c, d] -? R be an continuous function such that the partial derivative of order 2 exists and supposes that there exist constants 7, T £ R with7
<
9 Q t Q s s ^< r
for all (t, s) £ [a,6]
x [c, d]. Then, we haveb d \ l ( x , , ) +\H(x,y)-
j
-j
Six, s)ds2
(6
-0,a)^d-c) j ~
C ^ ’^ + ^ ~
^dt
(5) 1 2 (b — a) (d — c) aJ
[{x - a )/(a , s) + (6 - x)f(b, s)] ds 6 d t)dsdt < a C [(a? ~ a) 2 + (6 - x) 2] [(y - c) 2 + {d - y)2] 32(6 — a) (d — c)(r-7)
O n a N ew O stro w sk i-T y p e In e q u ality a n d R e la te d R esu lts 547
for all (x , y ) € [a, b] x [c, d] where H{x, y)
(x ~ a) [(y - c )/(a , c) + (d - y)f (a, d)] (b — a) (d — c) (b - x) [(y - c)f(b, c) + (d — y)f {b, d)} (b — a ) { d - c) (z - a )/(a , y) + (b - :r)/(fr, y) b — a {y - c )/(x , c) + (d - y)/(:r, d) d — c
T h e o re m 5.([5]) Let f : [a, b] x [c, d] —t R 6e an absolutely continuous function such
that the partial derivative of order 2 exists and suppose that there exist constants
7, T £ K with 7 < d < F for all (t , s) G [a, &] x [c, d]. Then, we have
(6)
(1 - A)2f ( x , y) + - ( 1 - A) [/(a, y ) + f{b, y) + f ( x , c) + f {x, d)] +
( 2
) [/(a>c) +
c) + / ( a> + / ( fe> rf)l
~ ( ! - A ) J f ( t , y ) d t + ^ j [ f { t , c ) + f(t , d)] dt \ '■ a a ' s d d (1 - A ) J f { x , s ) d s + ^ J [ f ( a , s ) + f(b,s)]ds
r + 7
(1 - A)2( z - (y - ~ Y ~ )c + d\ b d < r - 7 2 (b — a)(d — c)
(Aa + ( 1- + ' (A2 + (1 - A)2)( d - c) 2 X548 E rhan Set and Mehmet Zeki Sarikaya
for all (x, y) G [a + A y ^ , f> — A ^ y ] x [c + A^y2, d — A^y2] and A G [0,1]. For the other recent Ostrowski type results, see [4],[6],[8] and [9].
The m ain purpose of this article is to establish a new inequality similar to the inequalities (2)-(6) for higher-order derivatives of / involving functions of two independent variables.
2. M a in R e s u lts
T h e o r e m 6. Let f : [a, b] x [c, d] —> R be an continuous function such that the partial derivative of order 4 exists and supposes that there exist constants 7, F G R
with 7 < < r for all (t, s) G [a, b] x [c, d]. Then, we have
E( x , y ) (x - a)3 + (b - x) 3 (y - c)3 + (d - y)c 288
1 (r + 7)
< (x - a)3 + ( b - x) 3 (y - c f + ( d - y f 288( r - 7 )
for all (x,y) G [a, b] x [c, d],where {x - a ) ( y - c)
E( x , y ) = [/(:r, y) + f ( x , c) + / ( a , y) + / ( a , c)]
+ —— — — [/(^ , y) + f ( x , d) + / ( a , y) + / ( a , e0]
+ —— ^ r —— [/O, 2/) + / ( a:>c) + /(&> v ) + /(&> C)1
+ —— — — [f(x, y) + f {x, d) + /(&, y) + /(&, d)} y - c x — a 2~ rb fd
J
[f{t,y)
+ f{t, c)] dt -J
[f(t,d) + f { t , y ) ] d t J [f(x,s) + f { a , s ) ] d s - h—^ - j [f(b,s) + f ( x , s ) ] ds + n a f ( t, s)dsdt.O n a N ew O stro w sk i-T y p e In e q u a lity a n d R e la te d R esu lts 549 q : [c,d] x [c,rf] — given by and p(x,t) = ( x —t ) ( t —a) 2 ’ a < t < x ( x —t ) ( t —b) 2 ’ x < t <b (y - s ) ( s - c) 2 » c < s < y fy - s ) ( s - d ) 2 ’ y < s < d
By the definitions of these kernel functions, we can write b d. j Jp( x, t ) q{y, s) ^ dsdt a c x y = \ j j ( X ~ *)(< - a)(V - S)(S - C^9Qt2Qs2 dsdt a c x d (1.1) + ^ J j { x - t ) { t - a)(y - s ) ( s - d) ° *2 dsdt a y b y +
\f
J { x - t ) { t - b)(y - s ) ( s - c) d/ t} tds2] dsdt X C b d + \ j J ( x - t ) ( t - b)(y - s ) ( s - d) d-Jt ^ 2 dsdt x yIntegrating by parts in the right hand side of (1.1), we have
x y \ J J ( x - t)(.t - <*)(» - s)(s - c^dJ t2Qs2 dsdt a C = ^ - a^ y .. ^ [f(x, y) + f(x, c) + /(a, y) + f(a, c)] J [/(*, y) + f(t, c)]dt - £ [f(x,s) + f{a,s)]ds X y
II
f(t, s)dsdt. a c (1.2)550 Erhan Set and Mehmet Zeki Sarikaya
x d
\ J / ( * - *)(* - a)(y - s)(s - d^~dt^ds* dsdt
a y
(1-3) = — — — — [fix, y ) + f ( x , d) + /(a , y ) + /(a , d)}
+ f ( ^ y ) \ d t -
J
[ f ( x >s ) + f ( a >s )]d s x d + J J f{t,s)dsdt. a y (1.4) b y \ J J i x - * ) ( * - b)(y - s ) ( s - c) y ^ ^ - dsdt (y - c ) ( b - x ) [/(z, 2/) + f i x , c) + /(b, y) + /(&, c)] y ~ c 2 b y J [f(t,y) + f ( t , c ) \ d t - ^ - ^ - J [f(b,s) + f (x,s)]ds+
J J f (t , s)dsdt. (1.5) b d J J \ x ~ t)(t - b)(y - s)(s - d)d4/(M ) dt2ds2 dsdt x y (id - y ) { b - x ) [f{x, y) + f i x , d) + f{b, y ) + fib, d)] d - y 2 b d J [/(M ) + f i t , y ) ] d t - h—^ - J [fib,s) + f i x, s)]ds + J J f i t , s)dsdt. x yO n a N ew O stro w sk i-T y p e In e q u a lity a n d R e la te d R esu lts 551 b d
j J
P{ x , t ) q ( y , s ) a c (■x - a ) ( y - c) d4f ( t , s ) dt 2ds2 dsdt = (1.6) + We also have b d [f(x, y ) + f ( x , c) + f (a, y) + /( a , c)] + —— — — l f ( x, y) + f ( x , d) + f {a, y) + f ( a , d )] + —— — ~ [/(*> y ) + / ( x >c) + / ( 6> v) + / ( b> c)l + — — — — t/(x’ 2/) + Z(x’d) + / ( &> y) + / ( fe> d)l^~2~ fa + f(^c)}dt - Ja
L f M + /(*»»)]*Jc
[f(x, s) + f { a , s ) ] d s - if(b,s) + f ( x , s ) ] ds r b p d / j f (t, s)dsdt. J a J c (!-7)J J
p (x, t) q (y, s) dsdt = a cLet M = Prom (1.6) and (1.7), we can write
J J
p (x, t) q (y, s) ^ / ( M ) (x - a)3 + (b - x f (y - c)3 + (d - y f 144 dt 2ds 2 M dsdt a c b d (1.8)J J
p ( x , t ) q (y , s) dd ft}gsf dsdtr + 7
{x - a) + (b - x f (y - c)3 + ( d - y)c 144552 E rhan Set and M ehm et Zeki Sarikaya
On the other hand, we get b d (1.9)
J J
P ( x , t ) q ( y , i d4f (t , s ) dt2ds2 M dsdt < max (t,s)< E [a,6] x [c,d] d4f { t, s ) b d dt2ds2 MJ J
\P {x,t)q(y,s)\ dsdt Since (1.10) and max (£ ,s )€ [a ,6 ] x [c,d\ d4f ( t , s ) dt2ds2 M <r-7
b d(L11)
/ /
' \P (X' t ') q (y , S ') \dsdt = (x - a)3 + ( b - x f (y - c)3 + { d - y)“ 144 By using (1.10) and (1-11) in (1.9), we getb d (1.12)
J J
P ( x , t ) q ( y , s ) d4f ( t , s) dt2ds2 M dsdt < {x - a)3 + (6 - x)3 (y - c)3 + {d - y)" 288(r-7)-□
From (1.8) and (1.12), we see th at the required result holds.
Corollaty 7. By taking x = a and y — c or x = b and y = d in Theorem 6, we have (d — c) (b — a) d — c [/(a, c) + / ( a , d) + f(b, c) + f(b, d)]
J
[f(t,c) + f { t , d ) ] d t - h—^ - [f(a,s) + f{b,s)} dsn
df ( t , s)dsdt — + (■b — a)3 (d — c)3 288 (F + 7) < ( b - a f ( d - c ) 3 _ 288 v 'O n a New O stro w sk i-T y p e In e q u a lity a n d R e la te d R esu lts 553 {b —a ) { d - c ) a + b c + d +2 16 2 ’ 2 a H~ b , d ) + f [a, c + d + f ( b, + [/(a , c) + f(a, d) + f(b, c) + /(£>, d)} d — c b — a + ^ ) + / ( ( . cj
/
Jr
| / K s ) + 2/ 2n
d f(t, s)dsdt (b — a)3(d — c)3 2 a + b +/(6,s) ds (& — a )3(d — c)3 16 x 288(r + 7)
< 16 x 288( r - 7).
c + dR e fe r e n c e s
[1] X. L. Cheng, Improvement of some Ostrowski-Grass type inequalites, Comp. Math. Appl., 42(2001), 109-114.
[2] W-J. Liu, Q-L. Xue and S-F. Wang, Several new Perturbed Ostrowski-like type in equalities, J. Inequal. Pure and Appl. Math. (JIPAM), 8(4)(2007), Article: 110. [3] A. Ostrowski, Uber die Absolutabweichung einer differentierbaren Funktion von ihren
Integralmittelwert, Comment. Math. Helv., 10, 226-227, (1938).
[4] M. E. Ozdemir, H. Kavurmaci and E. Set, Ostrowski’s type inequalities for (a,m ) — convex functions, Kyungpook Math. J., 50(2010), 371-378.
[5] Q-L. Xue, J. Zhu and W-J. Liu, A new generalization of Ostrowski-type inequality involving functions of two independent variables, Comp. Math. Appl., 60(2010), 2219- 2224.
[6] Q. Xue, S. Wang and W. Liu, A new generalization of Ostrowski-Griiss type inequal ities involving functions of two independent variables, Miskolc Mathematical Notes, 12(2)(2011), 265-272.
[7] M. Z. Sankaya, On the Ostrowski type integral inequality, Acta Math. Univ. Comeni- anee, Vol. LXXIX, 1(2010), 129-134.
[8] M. Z. Sarikaya, On the Ostrowski type integral inequality for double integrals, Demon s tra te Mathematica, 45(3)(2012), 533-540.
554 Erhan Set and Mehmet Zeki Sarikaya
[9] M. Z. Sarikaya and H. Ogunmez, On the weighted Ostrowski type integral inequal ity fo r double integrals, The Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering (AJSE)- Mathematics, 36(2011), 1153-1160.
[10] N. Ujevic, Some double integral inequalities and applications, Acta Math. Univ. Come- nianae, LXXI, 2(2002), 189-199.