Oil comes in many forms as diverse as crude oil and vegetable oil, which serve very different purposes. Products consisting of oil are insoluble when added to water but will dissolve in organic substances such as those acquired from living organisms.
6. CONCLUSION
Based on the above comparison tables and analysis: rout pipeline option 3. Is it the first candidate option to be selected for its existing location is suitable good, Lowest level of threats from geopolitics, lowest demands of maintenance while operating, lowest cost of construction, high score of winner as per RA matrix lead to accept it with AHP and get it within safe to operate mode, it’s the second one due the land nature due to population and agriculture but it’s very good privileges due to the social factor which consider one of the new parameters within all projects, it’s for sure the lowest and shortest distance as per all parameters, high recommended to award this option and demand all support from Shabwah governorate to start this project instead of moving oil via trucks. The maintained relation with local’s trade the implemented projects with Low cost of construction, low distance, low required maintenance and operation and low rank of risk assessment comparing with other three options, followed by rout pipeline option pipeline option (4) Rout Pipelines option one& two. (Saaty, 2004)
These two options are the second candidates in comparison with the Rout Option 4.
Whichis exceedingly suggested tobe prohibited forbeing extremely hazardous and da ngerous. The two selections have the same heading with the same points of interest and restriction, the third alternative has it possess additional advantage:
blacktop road until the end of the roadblock 14 though it is 50 km longer than the second option, which have more than a hundred km desert road. The better road is absolutely the first option, which goes trade the desert from a social perspective. It is expected that road/blocks will be frequent at the beginning of the trucking operations in these new territories due to new tribal demands in which the trucks are passing.
Contractor should lead in resolving equipment's hiring demands or issues related to his contract with close monitoring from Shabwah to interfere when required.
Contact with the Governorate officials should be established before the movement of the oil trucks, and new establishment for oil pipeline construction then use Shabwah pipeline, so you need to take advantage of that and coordinate with the authorities in Shabwah to ensure their full support.
In particular, the feasibility stage of oil and gas projects, when the evaluation session is anticipated, to plan an alternate classification meeting, as the final section of the evaluation session is highly suggested and helpful to facilitate the correct selection of the solution to be developed during the following design stages, due to an objective and complete analysis. Crude oil shipments from Yemen have resumed on a small scale after being interrupted since early last years due to the ongoing civil war. “With the resumption of production and exports from the Yemeni oil field, the national economy has returned back to be more stable with too many serios need for such projects .( Salisbury,2011)
Table.6.1. Final decision Result Comparison-according to six criteria
Criteria Priority Rank Pipeline to port (Bir Ali) via block -Four Option (3) 50.1% First Pipeline Port of Al Shahr (Petromasila) Option (2) 27.8% Second Pipeline to Rass Isa Port via safer Company (1) 14.9% Third
Pipeline to Aden Port Option (4) 7.2% Fourth
Consistency Ratio CR = 3.2%
Recommendation to any future researchers to use other modules for more investigation about the criteria and selections of construction the best pipeline via using other modules of multi-decision criteria technique such as Topsis, Fuzzy AHP, ANP, VIKOR, PROMETHEA, DEMATEL and ELECTRE techniques of multi -decision selection criteria to make wide accuracy and diversity to get such more accurate results. And highly recommended to increase the criteria according to the challenge of the country (environmental, sustainable flow, external efforts, etc).
REFERENCES
Aytekin, Cavit E.2017,Human Factor In Geopolitics, Hacettepe University, the Graduate School of Social Science, M.Sc. Thesis, 133p,Ankara, Turkey.
Chai, J.Liu, J.N.K.&Ngai, E.W.T. 2013. Application Decision-Making
Techniques: Expert Systems With Applications articl, HongKong Polytechnic University (40), 3872–3885.
Dey, P. K. Ogunlana S.O, Gupta S.S. & Tabucanon M.T,2001. A Risk-Based
Maintenance Model Cross-Country Pipelines. Cost Engineering article, Aston University, UK, 40(4), 24-30.
Gupta S. P. K.1999. Decision Support System For Pipeline Route
Selection. International Journal Of Project Management, Vitoria British Columbia 41(10), 29-35.
Guanghua Q. June, 2011. The Application Of AHP In Oil And Gas Pipeline Route Selection, China University Of Oil Qingdao, China, Pag 3.
Hassan. Iqbal, S.Tasfamariam, H.Haider, Rehan S.2017. Structure
,Infrastructure Engineering Journal, Inspection And Maintenance Of Oil And Gas Pipelines, University Of British Colombia, 75, 321–329.
Joseph Hilyard, 2008 .Oil Pipelines, Terminal, Production Encyclopedia, PSAS Information of Yemen Oil Pipelines, USA, 472p.
Luara Alkatiri, August 2011, Enregry Poverty In Arab World, Yemen Case Study, Oil And Gas Journal, Oil Sector In Yemen, University Of London, UK, 50-80p.
Paleie, I. Lalic, B. 2009. AHP As a Tool for Selecting and Evaluating Projects.
International Journal of Simulation Modelling, 8(1),16-26.
Peter Salisbury, October, 2011. Middle East And North Africa Programme Paper MENA 2011, Yemen’s Economy: Oil, Imports And Elites, London, UK. 18p.
Petroleum Explorationand Production Authority(PEPA),2013,Concession map Date Accessed:04.2013.https://pepa.com.ye/Downloads/downloads.htm.
Prasanta K. D. S.S. Gupta,2001, Feasibility Analysis of Cross-Country Petroleum Pipeline Projects: A Quantitative Approach, Department of Management Studies, University of the West Indies(32) 4,50-58p. Jamaica.
Saaty, T.L. 2004. Decision Making the Analytic Hierarchy and Network Processes AHP. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering 13(1), 1–35.
Saaty, L. 2008,Decision Making With The Analytic Hierarchy Process Int. J.
Services Sciences, University Of Pittsburgh, Us.(1), 83-98.
Sam Nataraj, , 2005. Analytic Hierarchy Process As A Decision Support System In The Oil Pipeline Industry, Morehead State University, Kentucky (1) ,16-21p.
Stefania Benuccia & Fabrizio T. Auriga, 2014. Oil & Gas Projects Alternative Selection Using Analytic Hierarchy Process - A Case Study. Consulting. Italy Saipem, Fano University, Italy.42p,Rome
Thomas L.Saaty, 2008. Decision Making With The Analytic Hierarchy
Process, Int. J. Services Sciences. Katz Graduate School Of Business, University Of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA. 1 (1 ) ,530-560
Us Energy Information Cyclopedia (EIC), 2017, Yemen Country Analysis Brief Us Energy İnformation Cyclopedia, USA,1(1), 8-19p.
US Energy information administration (EIA),2019, Date accessed Dec.2019:
https://www.eia.gov/international/data/country/YEM
UN Publication, 2014,Economic And Social Commission For Western Asia, ,İssued By ESCWA.2014, Survey Of Economic And Social Developments İn Arab Region,E/ESCWA/EDID/2015/2.Page57file:///C:/Users/Rasheeq/Downloads/
Survey-Economic-And-Social-Development-Arab-Region-2014-2015.Pdf Volkan Yildirim, A Cagdas A.T.Yomralioglu,2007.Proceedings Of 27th Annual
Esrı User Conference,1-6,Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey (1).151-156p.
William J.Donaldson, Nov.2003,Studies Isalamic Law and Society, British Journal for Middle Eastern Studies UK, 30(2),257-260p.
Yang, Jiaqin, Zhao, 1997. AHP Decision Model For Facility Location Selection ,University Of North Dakota, Dakota, USA. (15)241–254p.
Yemen oil and gas Coorporation (YOGC),2018,Oil and gas statics 2018 http://www.yogc.com.ye/en/download.asp?ID=80