3.3 Bulgular
3.3.1 Ölçeklerin Geçerlilik ve Güvenilirliklerine İlişkin Bulgular
Até o presente momento a nossa equipe na FOUSP tem publicado estudos avaliando o impacto de problemas bucais tais como, a cárie dentária, LDT e maloclusões na QVRSB de pré-escolares (25, 27) e seus pais (26) no Brasil. Um
estudo similar foi publicado pela nossa equipe também em uma população de crianças com necessidades especiais (123).
A partir dos resultados desta tese temos acesso a um instrumento que mensura QVRSB em crianças brasileiras de 5 e 6 anos de idade de acordo com a percepção tanto de crianças quanto de pais, garantindo assim uma visão geral da realidade da criança. Da mesma maneira, conhecemos agora mais detalhadamente, algo antes não avaliado, a própria percepção do paciente sobre o impacto que a cárie dentária e as LDT têm nas suas atividades diárias, bem como, os aspectos da vida da criança que pais e mães mais conhecem podendo ser considerados respondentes secundários sobre a QVRSB dos seus filhos.
Todos estes achados são importantes e podem auxiliar na elaboração e/ou modificação de políticas de Saúde Pública no Brasil, destinando os recursos humanos, técnicos e financeiros para doenças bucais que sejam efetivamente consideradas como problemas de saúde bucal desde a percepção da própria população. Porém, pelo menos duas ações ainda devem ser realizadas, instrumentos com responsividade comprovada devem ser utilizados em estudos clínicos futuros com o objetivo de conhecer quais intervenções proporcionam uma melhor QVRSB para os pacientes, e é necessária a incorporação de medidas de QV em estudos de custo-efetividade para avaliar as diferentes intervenções e programas.
Dessa forma, os recursos institucionais ou do governo poderão ser destinados para intervenções que possuam efetividade abrangente, para a melhoria da qualidade de vida e saúde de uma população.
7 CONCLUSÕES
Pode-se concluir que:
1. A versão brasileira do SOHO-5 (Scale of Oral Health Outcomes for 5- year-old children) representa adequadamente o instrumento original em inglês, sendo que o processo de tradução e adaptação transcultural possibilitou a equivalência semântica e idiomática do instrumento.
2. A versão brasileira do SOHO-5 apresenta propriedades psicométricas satisfatórias de confiabilidade e validade podendo ser aplicada como instrumento de mensuração de QVRSB em crianças de 5 e 6 anos de idade no Brasil;
3. A versão brasileira do SOHO-5 é responsiva a mudanças clínicas após o tratamento odontológico. Tanto a versão dos pais quanto a versão de auto-relato da criança apresentam resultados satisfatórios, entretanto, a versão da criança apresenta um melhor desempenho.
4. A cárie dentária, mas não as LDT, apresenta impacto negativo na QVRSB de crianças de 5 e 6 anos de idade, de acordo com a percepção tanto de pais quanto de filhos. Ter uma renda familiar mensal acima de 3 salários mínimos melhora a QVRSB nesta faixa etária, independente do tipo de agravo bucal.
5. As mães avaliam a QVRSB dos seus filhos de 5 e 6 anos de idade de forma semelhante às crianças, enquanto que os pais tendem a subestimar os relatos. As mães podem ser preferencialmente escolhidas como respondentes dos seus filhos, mas não deve-se substituir o auto-relato da criança.
REFERÊNCIAS1
1. Jokovic A, Locker D, Stephens M, Kenny D, Tompson B, Guyatt G. Validity and reliability of a questionnaire for measuring child oral-health-related quality of life. J Dent Res. 2002 Jul;81(7):459–63.
2. Jokovic A, Locker D, Tompson B, Guyatt G. Questionnaire for measuring oral health-related quality of life in eight- to ten-year-old children. Pediatr Dent. 2004 Nov-Dec; 26(6):512-8.
3. Jokovic A, Locker D, Guyatt G. Short forms of the Child Perceptions Questionnaire for 11-14-year-old children (CPQ11-14): development and initial evaluation. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006 Jan 19;4:4.
4. Jokovic A, Locker D, Stephens M, Kenny D, Tompson B, Guyatt G. Measuring parental perceptions of child oral health-related quality of life. J Public Health Dent. 2003 Spring;63(2):67–72.
5. Gherunpong S, Tsakos G, Sheiham A. Developing and evaluating an oral health- related quality of life index for children; the CHILD-OIDP. Community Dent Health. 2004 Jun;21(2):161–9.
6. Broder HL, Wilson-Genderson M. Reliability and convergent and discriminant validity of the Child Oral Health Impact Profile (COHIP Child's version). Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2007 Aug;35 Suppl 1:20-31.
7. Yusuf H, Gherunpong S, Sheiham A, Tsakos G. Validation of an English version of the Child-OIDP index, an oral health-related quality of life measure for children. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006 Jul;1;4:38.
8. Connolly MA, Johnson JA. Measuring quality of life in paediatric patients. Pharmacoeconomics. 1999 Dec;16(6):605-25.
9. Varni JW, Seid M, Kurtin PS. PedsQL" 4.0: reliability and validity of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory version 4.0 generic core scales in healthy and patient populations. Med Care. 2001 Aug;39(8):800–12.
1 De acordo com Estilo Vancouver.
10. Filstrup SL, Briskie D, da Fonseca M, Lawrence L, Wandera A, Inglehart MR. Early childhood caries and quality of life: child and parent perspectives. Pediatr Dent. 2003 Sep-Oct;25:431-40.
11. Pahel BT, Rozier RG, Slade GD. Parental perceptions of children's oral health: the Early Childhood Oral Health Impact Scale (ECOHIS). Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007 Jan 30;5:6.
12. Steele MM, Steele RG, Varni JW. Reliability and validity of the PedsQLTM Oral Health Scale: measuring the relationship between child oral health and health- related quality of life. Child Health Care. 2009 Jul;38(3):228-44.
13. Tsakos G, Blair YI, Yusuf H, Wright W, Watt RG, Macpherson LMD. Developing a new self-reported scale of oral health outcomes for 5-year-old children (SOHO- 5). Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2012 Jun 7;10:62.
14. Jokovic A, Locker D, Guyatt G. How well do parents know their children? Implications for proxy reporting of child health-related quality of life. Qual Life Res. 2004 Sep;13(7):1297-307.
15. Barbosa TS, Gavião MB. Oral health-related quality of life in children: part III. Is there agreement between parents in rating their children's oral health-related quality of life? A systematic review. Int J Dent Hyg. 2008 May;6(2):108-13.
16. Vetter TR, Bridgewater CL, McGwin G. An observational study of patient versus parental perception of health-related quality of life in children and adolescents with chronic pain condition: who should the clinical believe? Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2012 Jul 23;10:85.
17. Ardon MS, Selles RW, Roebroeck ME, Hovius SE, Stam HJ, Janssen WG. Poor agreement on health-related quality of life between children with congenital hand differences and their parents. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Apr;93(4):641-6.
18. Guyatt G, Walter S, Norman G. Measuring change over time: assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments. J Chron Dis. 1987;40(2):171-8.
19. Deyo R, Patrick D. Reproducibility and responsiveness of health status measures: statistics and strategies for evaluation. Control Clin Trials. 1991 Aug;12(4 Suppl):142S-58S.
20. Guyatt G, Osoba D, Wu A, Wyrwich K, Norman G. Clinical Significance Consensus Meeting Group: Methods to explain the significance of health status measures. Mayo Clin Proc. 2002 Apr;77(4):371-83.
21. Li S, Malkinson S, Veronneau J, Allison PJ. Testing responsiveness to change for the early childhood oral health impact scale (ECOHIS). Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2008 Dec;36(6):542-8.
22. Lee GHM, McGrath C, Yiu CKY, King NM. Sensitivity and responsiveness of the Chinese ECOHIS to dental treatment under general anaesthesia. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2011 Aug;39(4):372-7.
23. Vadiaskas G. Case definition, aethiology and riskk assessment of early childhood caries (ECC): a revisited review. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2008 Sep;9(13):114-25.
24. Glendor U. Epidemiology of traumatic dental injuries—a 12 year review for the literature. Dent Traumatol. 2008 Dec;24(6):603-11.
25. Abanto J, Carvalho TS, Mendes FM, Wanderley MT, Bönecker M, Raggio DP. Impact of oral diseases and disorders on oral health-related quality of life of preschool children. Commun Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2011 Apr;39(2):105-14.
26. Abanto J, Paiva SM, Raggio DP, Celiberti P, Aldrigui JM, Bönecker M. The impact of dental caries and trauma in children on family quality of life. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2012 Aug;40(4):323-31.
27. Aldrigui JM, Abanto J, Carvalho TS, Mendes FM, Wanderley MT, Bönecker M, Raggio DP. Impact of traumatic dental injuries and malocclusions on quality of life of young children. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2011 Sep 24;9:78.
28. Viegas CM, Scarpelli AC, Carvalho AC, Ferreira F de M, Pordeus IA, Paiva SM. Impact of traumatic dental injury on quality of life among Brazilian preschool children and their families. Pediatr Dent. 2012 Jul-Aug;34(4):300-6.
29. Wong HM, McGrath CP, King NM, Lo EC. Oral health-related quality of life in Hong Kong preschool children. Caries Res. 2011;45(4):370-6.
30. Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Projeto SB Brasil: Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde Bucal. Brasília: Ministério de Saúde; 2010 [citado 15 nov. 2012]. Disponível em: http://189.28.128.100/dab/docs/geral/projeto_sb2010_relatorio_final.pdf.
31. Sheiham A. Dental caries affects body weight, growth and quality of life in pre- school children. Br Dent J. 2006 Nov;201(10):625-6.
32. Wadhawan S, Kumar JV, Badner VM, Green EL. Early childhood caries related visits to Hospitals for Ambulatory Surgery in New York State. J Public Health Dent. 2003 Winter;63(1):47–51.
33. Majewski RF, Snyder CW, Bernat JE. Dental emergencies presenting to a children’s hospital. ASDC J Dent Child. 1988 Sep-Oct;55(5):339-42.
34. De Vasconcelos Cunha Bonini GA, Marcenes W, Oliveira LB, Sheiham A, Bönecker M. Trends in the prevalence of traumatic dental injuries in Brazilian preschool children. Dent Traumatol. 2009 Dec;25(6):594-8.
35. Lee JY, Divaris K. Hidden consequences of dental trauma: the social and psychological effects. Pediatr Dent. 2009 Mar-Apr;31(2):96-101.
36. WHO. Preamble to the Constitution of the World Health Organization as adopted by the International Health Conference, New York, 19-22 June, 1946; signed on 22 July 1946 by the representatives of 61 States (Official Records of the World Health Organization, no. 2, p. 100) and entered into force on 7 April 1948 [citado 15 nov. 2012]. Disponível em: http://www. who.int/about/definition/en/print.html).
37. Gherunpong S, Sheiham A, Tsakos G. A sociodental approach to assessing children's oral health needs: integrating an oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) measure into oral health service planning. Bull World Health Organ. 2006 Jan;84(1):36-42.
38. Jokovic A, Locker D, Stephens M, Kenny D, Tompson B, Guyatt G. Validity and reliability of a questionnaire for measuring child oral-health-related quality of life. J Dent Res. 2002 Jul;81(7):459-63.
39. World Health Organization. WHOQOL – measuring quality of life. The World Health Organization quality of life instruments. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1997.
40. Seidl EM, Zannon CMLC. Quality of life and health: conceptual and methodological issues. Cad Saúde Pública. 2004 Mar-Apr;20(2):580-8.
41. Guyatt GH, Feeny DH, Patrick DL. Measuring health-related quality of life. Ann Intern Med. 1993 Apr 15;118(8):622-9.
42. Testa MA, Simonson DC. Assessment of quality of life outcomes. N Eng J Med. 1996 Mar 28;334(13):835-40.
43. Fitzpatrick R, Flecher A, Gore S, Jones D, Spiegelhalter CD. Quality of life measures in health care: applications and issues in assessment. BMJ. 1992 Oct 31;305(6861):1074-7.
44. McDowell I, Neweel C. Measuring health: a guide to rating scales and questionnaires. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 1996.
45. Lohr KN, Aaronson NK, Alonso J, Burnam MA, Patrick DL, Perrin EB, Roberts JS. Evaluating quality of life and health status instruments: development of Scientific Review Criteria. Clin Ther. 1996 Sep-Oct;18(5):979-92.
46. Scientific Advisory Committee of Medical Outcomes Trust. Assessing health and quality of life instruments: attributes and review criteria. Qual Life Res. 2002 May;11(3):193-205.
47. Fitzpatrick R, Davey C, Buxton MJ, Jones DR. Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials. Health Technology Assessment. 1998;2(14):1- 74.
48. Waltz CF, Strickland OL, Lenz E. Measurement in nursing research. Philadelphia: FA. Davis Company; 1991.
49. Pereira JCR. Análise de dados qualitativos: estratégias metodológicas para ciências da saúde, humanas e sociais. São Paulo: EDUSP; 1999.
50. Pasquali L. Psicometria: teoria e aplicações. Brasília: UnB; 1997.
51. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford Medical Publications; 1995.
52. Fayers PM, Machin D. Quality of life assessment, analysis and interpretation. England: John Wiley & Sons; 2000.
53. Clark-Carter D. Doing quantitative psychological research: from design to report. 3rd ed. Sussex: Psychological Press; 1999.
54. Norman GR, Sridhar FG, Guyatt GH, Walter SD. Relation of distribution- and anchor-based approaches in interpretation of change in health-related quality of life. Med Care. 2001 Oct;39(10):1039-47.
55. Barrett B, Brown R, Mundt Marion. Comparison of anchor-based and distributional approaches in estimating important difference in common cold. Qual Life Res. 2008 Feb;17(1):75-85.
56. Marquis P, Chassany O, Abertz L. A comprehensive strategy for the interpretation of quality-of-life data based on existing methods. Value Health. 2004 Jan-Fev;7(1):93-104.
57. Kaziz LE, Anderson JJ, Meenan RF. Effect size for interpreting changes in health status. Med care. 1989 Mar;27(3 suppl):S178-S89.
58. Deyo RA, Diehr P, Patrick DL. Reproducibility and responsiveness of health status measures. Statistics and strategies for evaluation. Control Clin Trials. 1991 Aug;12(4 Suppl):142S-158S.
59. Wyrwich KW, Bullinger M, Aaronson N, Hays RD, Patrick DL, Symonds T, The Clinical Significance Consensus Meeting Group. Estimating clinically significant differences in quality of life outcomes. Qual Life Res. 2005 Mar;14(2):285-95.
60. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nded. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
61. Crosby AD, Kolotkin RL, Williams GR. Defining clinically meaningful change in health-related quality of life. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003 May;56(5):395-407.
62. Vet HC, Terwee CB, Ostelo RW, Beckerman H, Knol DL, Bouter LM. Minimal changes in health status questionnaires: distribution between minimally detectable change and minimally important change. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006 Aug 22;4:54.
Responsiveness and minimal important differences for patient reported outcomes. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006 Sep 27;4:70.
64. Schunemann H, Guyatt G. Commentary- googbye M(C)ID! Hello MID, where do you come from? Health Ser Res. 2005 Apr;40(2):593-7.
65. Oliveira AS. Índice de qualidade de vida de Ferrans & Powers – versão feridas: estudo da responsividade [tese]. São Paulo: Universidade de São Paulo, Escola de Enfermagem; 2012.
66. Fayers PM, Machin D. Quality of Life. The assessment, analysis and interpretation of patient-reported outcomes. England: John Wiley & Sons; 2007.
67. Sevenhuysen GP, Trumble-Waddell J. A new perspective on quality of life. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997 Mar;50(3):231-2.
68. Wallander JL, Schmitt M, Koot HM. Quality of life measurement in children and adolescents: issues, instruments, and applications. J Clin Psychol. 2001 Apr; 57(4):571-85.
69. Martins-Júnior PA, Ramos-Jorge J, Paiva SM, Marques LS, Ramos Jorge ML. Validations of the Brazilian version of the Early Childhood Oral Health Impact Scale (ECOHIS). CAD Saúde Publica. 2012 Feb;28(2):367-74.
70. Scarpelli AC, Oliveira BH, Tesch FC, Leão AT, Pordeus IA, Paiva SM. Psychometric properties of the Brazilian version of the Early Childhood Oral Health Impact Scale (B-ECOHIS). BMC Oral Health. 2011 Jun 13;11:19.
71. Klatchoian DA, Len CA, Terreri MT, Silva M, Itamoto C, Ciconelli RM, Varni JW, Hilario MO. Quality of life of children and adolescents from São Paulo: reliability and validity of the Brazilian version of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory version 4.0 Generic Core Scales. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2008 Jul-Aug;84(4):308-15.
72. Varni JW, Seid M, Kurtin PS. PedsQL 4.0: reliability and validity of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory version 4.0 generic core scales in healthy and patient populations. Med Care. 2001 Aug;39(8):800-12.
73. Bendo CB, Paiva SM, Viegas CM, Vale MP, Varni JW. The PedsQLTM Oral Health Scale: feasibility, reliability and validity of the Brazilian Portuguese version. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2012 Apr 24;10:42.
74. Gradella CM, Bernabé E, Bönecker M, Oliveira LB. Caries prevalence and severity, and quality of life in Brazilian 2-to-4-year-old children. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2011 Dec;39(6):498-504.
75. Goettems ML, Ardenghi TM, Romano AR, Demarco FF, Torriani DD. Influence of maternal dental anxiety on oral health-related quality of life of preschool children. Qual Life Res. 2011 Aug;20(6):951-9.
76. Zhang M, McGrath C, Hägg U. Who knows more about the impact of malocclusion on children’s quality of life, mothers or fathers? Eur J Orthod. 2007 Apr;29(2):180-5.
77. Wilson-Genderson M, Broder HL, Phillips C. Concordance between caregiver and child reports of child’s oral health-related quality of life. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2007 Aug;35 Suppl 1:32–40.
78. Benson P, O’Brien C, Marshman Z. Agreement between mothers and children with malocclusion in rating children’s oral health-related quality of life. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthoped. 2010 May;137(5):631-8.
79. Ferreira MC, Goursand D, Bendo CB, Ramos-Jorge ML, Pordeus IA, Paiva SM. Agreement between adolescents' and their mothers' reports of oral health-related quality of life. Braz Oral Res. 2012 Apr;26(2):112-8.
80. Jokovic A, Locker D, Stephens M, Guyatt G. Agreement between mothers and children aged 11-14 years in rating child oral-health related quality of life. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2003 Oct;31(5):335-43.
81. Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993 Dec;46(12):1417-32.
82. Herdman M, Fox-Rushby J, Badia X. A model of equivalence in the cultural adaptation of HRQoL instruments: the universalist approach. Qual Life Res. 1998 May;7(4): 323-35.
83. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scale: practical guide to their development and use. 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2003.
84. Van Widenfelt BMV, Treffers PDA, Beurs E, Siebelink BM, Koudijs E. Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of assessment instruments used in psychological research with children and families. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2005 Jun;8(2): 135-47.
85. Stewart AL, Hays RD, Ware Jr JE. Methods of constructing health measures. In: Measuring functioning and well-being. The medical outcomes study approach. Durham and London: Duke University Press; 1992, p. 67-85.
86. Altman D. Practical Statistics for Medical Research. 1st ed. London: Chapman and Hall; 1994.
87. Knutson JW. An index of the prevalence of dental caries in school children. Public Health Rep. 1944;59(8):253-63.
88. Malden PE, Thomson WM, Jokovic A, Locker D. Changes in parent-assessed oral health-related quality of life among young children following dental treatment under general anaesthetic. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2008 Apr;36(2):108- 17.
89. Beaton D, Hogg-Johnson S, Bombardier C. Evaluating changes in health status. Reliability and responsiveness of five generic health status measures in workers with soft tissue injuries. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997 Jan;50(1):79-93.
90. Glendor U, Halling A, Andersson L, Eilert-Petersson E. Incidence of traumatic tooth injuries in children and adolescents in the county of Västmanland, Sweden. Swed Dent J. 1996;20(1-2):15-28.
91. Juniper G, Guyatt G, Willan A, Griffith L. Determining a minimal important change in a disease-specific quality of life questionnaire. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994 Jan;47(1):81-7.
92. Mackenzie C, Charlson M, DiGioia D, Kelley K. Can the sickness impact profile measure change? An example of scale assessment. J Chronic Dis. 1986;39(6):429-38.
93. Locker D, Jokovic A, Clarke M. Assessing the responsiveness of measures of oral health-related quality of life. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2004 Feb;32(1):10-8.
94. Fitzpatrick R, Ziebland S, Jenkinson C, Mowat A. A comparison of the sensitivity to change of several health status measurements in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 1993 Mar;20(3):429-36.
95. Liang MH, Fossel AH, Larson MG. Comparisons of five health status instruments for orthopedic evaluation. Med Care. 1990 Jul;28(7):632-42.
96. Mashoto KO, Astrom AN, Skeie MS, Masalu JR. Changes in the quality of life of Tanzanian school children after treatment interventions using the Child-OIDP. Eur J Oral Sci. 2010 Dec;118(6):626-34.
97. WHO. Oral health surveys: basics methods. 4th ed. Geneva: Word Health Organization; 1997.
98. Hallet KB, O'rourke PK. Pattern and severity of early childhood caries. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2006 Feb;34(1):25-35.
99. Walter SD, Eliasziw M, Donner A. Sample size and optimal designs for reliability studies. Stat Med. 1998 Jan;17(1):101-10.
100. Hetherington EM, Parke RD, Locke VO. Child Psychology: A Contemporary Viewpoint. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1996.
101. Cox MJ, Paley B. Families as systems. Annu Rev Psychol. 1997;48:243-67.
102. Torres CS, Paiva SM, Vale MP, Pordeus IA, Ramos-Jorge ML, Oliveira AC, Allison PJ. Psychometric properties of the Brazilian version of the Child Perceptions Questionnaire (CPQ11-14) – short forms. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2009 May 17;7:43.
103. Goursand D, Paiva SM, Zarzar PM, Ramos-Jorge ML, Cornacchia GM, Pordeus IA, Allison PJ. Cross-cultural adaptation of the Child Perceptions Questionnaire 11-14 (CPQ11-14) for the Brazilian Portuguese language. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2008 Jan 14;6:2.
104. Castro RA, Cortes MI, Leão AT, Portela MC, Souza IP, Tsakos G, Marcenes W, Sheiham A. Child-OIDP index in Brazil: cross-cultural adaptation and validation. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2008 Sep 15;6:68.
105. Goursand D, Paiva SM, Zarzar PM, Pordeus IA, Grochowski R, Allison PJ. Measuring parental-caregiver perceptions of child oral health-related quality of life: psychometric properties of the Brazilian version of the P-CPQ. Braz Dent J. 2009;20(2):169-74.
106. Watt RG, Harnett R, Daly B, Fuller SS, Kay E, Morgan A, Munday P, Nowjack- Raymer R, Treasure ET. Evaluating oral health promotion: need for quality outcome measures. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2006 Feb;34(1):11-7.
107. Tsakos G, Allen PF, Steele JG, Locker D. Interpreting oral health-related quality of life data. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2012 Jun;40(3):193-200.
108. Husted JA, Cook RJ, Farewell VT, Gladman DD. Methods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and recommendations. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000 May;53(5):459-68.
109. Locker D. Disparities in oral health-related quality of life in a population of Canadian children. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2007 Oct;35(5):348-56.
110. Pappa E, Kontodimopoulos N, Papadopoulos AA, Niakas D. Assessing the socioeconomic and demographic impact on health-related quality of life: evidence from Greece. Int J Public Health. 2009;54(4):241-9.
111. Piovesan C, Antunes JL, Guedes RS, Ardenghi TM. Impact of socioeconomic