Cilt 4 1, Haziran 2020, Sayfa: 10-33.
Politics, Economics and Administrative Sciences Journal of Kirsehir Ahi Evran University Volume 4, Issue 1, June 2020, Page: 10-33.
/ Aplication Date: 12 Mart 2020 / March 12, 2020 Makale Kabul Tarihi / Acceptance Date: 22 2020 / May 22, 2020
MAKALE /ARTICLE:
DETERMINATION OF FACTORS EFFECTING JOB SATISFACTION AND CORPORATE LOYALTY:
,
Anahtar Kelimeler:
in Lojistik Regresyonla . E-mail: aguler@cumhuriyet.edu.tr . ORCID ID: 0000-0003-4220-918
Prof. hbircan@gmail.com, ORCID ID: 0000-0002-
1868-1161
ABSTRACT
satisfaction and corporate loyalty. The research includes 1556 administrative staff who work Questionnaire and corporate loyalty Questionnaire developed by Allen and Meyyer (1991).
Corporate loyalty levels of emotional commitment factor is determined significant impact on job satisfaction (P<0,000).
Results of multiple regression analysis; emotional commitments are the most important independent variables which is affecting job satisfaction, intrinsic satisfaction and extrinsic satisfaction and there is a significant and positive relationship between the size of this variable. There is no significant effect on job satisfaction and continued loyalty.
Keywords: Job satisfaction; corporate loyalty; regression analysis.
2).
n son
2007: 62).
daha sonra ise idari
2.
2
2007: 34).
ermektedir (Konuk, 2006: 59).
1997: 46).
73).
; Moti
;
klinde Herzberg ve
ba (Efil, 1999: 120-121).
143).
; Bu kuramda bireylerin hedefleri
lece bireylerin motivasyonuna -125).
iste (Daft, 1997: 535).
ir.
Teorinin ana fikri, (Eren, 1993: 378).
3).
(Berry, 1997: 46).
327).
2.3.1.
(Baytok , 2001: 82-83).
itim durumu ve benzeridir (Davis, 1982: 96- 100).
Cinsiyet;
-
olanaklar
2.3.2.
(Keser, 2009: 102).
gelir sistemi ve kariyer - 100).
sergileyebilmektedir (Eren, 2010: 34).
tatmin
77).
2004: 189).
imde ifade edemeyen
ir (Keser, 2009: 110).
19-38-23).
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
13-19).
3-64).
-
ileri
18-19).
-
2014: 3).
Allen-
(Kaynak: Meyer vd., 2002: 36).
007: 44).
46).
dur
300):
1.
2. atminine sebep olur.
3.
4.
-
166).
95).
72.).
2007: 9).
2007: 10).
ak belirtilmektedir. Bu
adaletsiz
84).
3.
45).
belirlenmesidir.
H4
2016: 23).
116).
N:
n:
z:
d: =d)
p:
n:
N: 1556 p:
q: 0,5 z: 1,96 d: 0,05
= 308
3.5.
ol
Davis, Ebgland, ve Lofquist
Memnunum
Kesinlikle
4. BULGULAR
4.1. Demografik Bulgular
demografik bulgular -
Tablo 1:
(%) (%)
Cinsiyet Medeni durum
Bay 187 60,7 Evli 233 75,6
Bayan 121 39,3 Bekar 75 24,4
18- 19 6,2 Yok 87 28,2
26- 60 19,5 "1" tane 66 21,4
31- 79 25,6 "2" tane 111 36,0
36- 46 14,9 "3" tane 28 9,1
104 33,7 16 5,2
Memleket
Evet 123 52,7 Sivas 242 78,6
110 47,3 66 21,4
Evet 77 25,0 78 25,3
231 75,0
Birimler
230 74,7
4 1,3 Emeklilik 97 31,5
1 0,3 Kariyer 64 20,8
167 54,2 19 6,2
74 24,0 7 2,3
30 9,7 101 32,7
32 10,4 i 20 6,5
1 73 23,7 1 97 31,5
235 76,3 211 68,5
11 3,6 Ekonomik ve Zorunlu nedenlerle 206 66,9
Lise ve dengi 64 20,8 88 28,6
198 64,3 14 4,5
35 11,4
TOPLAM 308 100 TOPLAM 308 100
- -
ve
Tablo 2: Verilerin Normallik Testi
Std. Hata
,353 ,139
-,192 ,277
,056 ,139
Bas -,146 ,277
-
Tablo e b
-
- - - -
- - - - -
ve 4.21- - -
Tablo 3:
Boyutlar
N SS
308 2,32 0,66
308 2,63 0,85
308 2,45 0,68
k 308 2,46 0,90
308 3,00 0,73
308 2,86 0,76
308 2,77 0,60
Tablo 3 ( =2,45) ( = 2,77)
sal
Tablo-4
Tablo 4:
Boyutlar
(Genel)
Duygusal Devam Normatif
,509** ,600** ,090 ,420**
,486** ,559** ,095 ,409**
,456** ,553** ,071 ,367**
Tablo 4
tespit edilm
Tablo 5:
Modelin ANOVA Regresyon
Hipotez
R F P Beta t P
Duygusal
0,564 0,318 44,286 0,000
,498 7,895 ,000** H1 Kabul Devam
Tatmin
- ,002
-,033 ,974 H2 Red
Normatif ,097 1,467 ,144 H3 Red
Tablo 5 t
F=44,286, P =
reddedilmektedir.
Tablo 6: ine Etkisi
Modelin ANOVA Regresyon
Hipotez
R F P Beta t P
Duygusal
Tatmin 0,554 0,307 42,084 0,000
,532 8,356 ,000** H4 Kabul
Devam -
,011 -,205 ,838 H5 Red
Normatif ,037 ,556 ,578 H6 Red
Tablo 6 a
P=0,00).
reddedilmektedir.
Tablo 7:
Modelin ANOVA Regresyon
Hipotez
R F P Beta t P
(Genel) 0,603 0,363 54,155 0,000
,554 9,084 ,000* H7 Kabul -,006 -,127 ,899 H8 Red ,075 1,167 ,244 H9 Red
Tablo 7 e
potezi kabul edilmekte olup, H8 (P>0,05) ve H9 (P>0,05) hipotezleri reddedilmektedir.
-5 -
birimlerde ( Hastane vs
tatmin
tatmini ve g
cesindedirler.
veril
KAYNAKLAR
ADA, Nesrin Dergisi.
,
, -
Uygulama, ersitesi Sosyal Bilimler
Psychology at Work Mc Graw Hill Co. Inc., San Francisco.
HANG RO
Ba Tatmini ine Etkisi i i E m Hastanesinde Bir
Ara
S.3 s.399,410.
-
. An
DAFT, Richard L., (1997), Ptinciples of Management, 4. Ed., The Dryden Press.
- : Kemal Tosun),
-
da Kur
23(3), 35-52.
EREN, Erol, (2010),
-Nisan.
Ege
el Bir cial Mentality And Researcher Thinkers Journal Open Access Refereed E- Journal & Refereed & Indexed.
Pearson New International Eddition, Multivariate Data Analysis.
(2
Aktaran Nilay Kaya), s. 93.
KESER, A., (2009), Bursa: Ekin
s.285-299.
MAYER, R.C., DAVIS J.H., SCHOORMAN, F.D., (1995), An integrative model of organizational trust, Academy of Management Review, 20, 709-734.
MEYER, John P. ve ALLEN, Natalie J., (1997), Commitment in the Workplace: Theory,
MEYER, J., STANLEY, D. J., HERSCOVITCH, P. and TOPOLNYTSKY, L., (2002), Affective, Continuance, and Normative Commitment to the Organization: A Meta analysis of Antecedents, Correlates, and Consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, (akt; Yenihan,
Kitabevi, Adana.
mini,
-19.
_ Dergisi, 5(1), 55-65.
THOMAS, C. W. (1998), Maintaining and Restoring Public Trust in Government Agencies and Their Employees, Administration & Society, 30(2), pp. 166-193.
ULUSOY, T., (1993), ,
Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, C:4, S:2, ss.30-67.
