• Sonuç bulunamadı

Abstract Mathematics Lecture 19

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Abstract Mathematics Lecture 19"

Copied!
14
0
0

Yükleniyor.... (view fulltext now)

Tam metin

(1)
(2)

The Triangle Inequality

Definitions in calculus and analysis use absolute value extensively. |x| =



x , x ≥ 0 −x, x < 0.

Fundamental properties of absolute value include |xy | = |x | · |y | and x ≤ |x |.

Another property—used often in proofs—is the triangle inequality

Definition

(3)

Sketch Proof.

Observe in the diagrams below that regardless of the order of x , y , z on the number line, the inequality |x − y | ≤ |x − z| + |z − y | holds.

x y z | {z } |x−z| |x−y | z }| { |z−y | z }| { y x z | {z } |z−y | |x−y | z }| { |x−z| z }| { z x y | {z } |z−y | |x−z| z }| { |x−y | z }| { x z y | {z } |x−y | |x−z| z }| { |z−y | z }| { y z x | {z } |x−y | |z−y | z }| { |x−z| z }| { z y x | {z } |x−z| |z−y | z }| { |x−y | z }| {

(4)

Definition of a Limit

We need to know how a certain function f (x ) behaves when x is close to some number c.

Limits are designed to deal with this type of problem.

Definition (Informal definition of a limit)

Suppose f is a function and c is a number. Then lim

x →cf (x ) = L means

that f (x ) is arbitrarily close to L provided that x is sufficiently close to c.

Definition (Precise definition of a limit)

Suppose f : X → R is a function, where X ⊆ R, and c ∈ R. Then lim

x →cf (x ) = L means that for any real ε > 0 (no matter how small), there

is a real number δ > 0 for which |f (x ) − L| < ε provided that 0 < |x − c| < δ.

(5)

Example

Prove that lim

x →2(3x + 4) = 10.

Proof.

Suppose ε > 0. Note that

|(3x + 4) − 10| = |3x − 6| = |3(x − 2)| = 3|x − 2|. So if δ = ε3 , then 0 < |x − 2| < δ yields |(3x + 4) − 10| = 3|x − 2| < 3δ = 33ε = ε. In summary, for any ε > 0, there is δ for which 0 < |x − 2| < δ implies |(3x + 4) − 10| < ε. By Definition, lim

x →2(3x + 4) = 10.

Example

Prove that lim

x →2 5x

(6)

Limits That Do Not Exist Given a function f and a number c, there are two ways that lim

x →cf (x ) = L can be false.

First, there may be a different number M 6= L for which lim

x →cf (x ) = M.

Second, it may be that Statement

∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, 0 < |x − c| < δ ⇒ |f (x) − L| < ε . (1) is false for all L ∈ R. In such a case we say that lim

(7)

Example

Suppose f (x ) = x

2 +

|x − 2|

x − 2 + 2. Prove limx →2f (x ) does not exist.

Notice that f (2) is not defined, as it involves division by zero. Also, f (x ) behaves differently depending on whether x is to the right or left of 2.

x y y = f (x ) 2 2+δ 2−δ 2 4 L+ε L L−ε a b f (a) f (b)

(8)

Suppose for the sake of contradiction that lim

x →2f (x ) = L, where L is a real

number. Let ε = 12.

By Definition, there is a real number δ > 0 for which 0 < |x − 2| < δ implies f (x ) − L < 12.

Put a = 2 −2δ , so 0 < |a − 2| < δ. Hence f (a) − L < 12. Put b = 2 +2δ , so 0 < |b − 2| < δ. Hence f (b) − L

< 12.

Further, f (a) < 2 and f (b) > 4, so 2 < |f (b) − f (a)|. With this we get a contradiction 2 < 1, as follows: 2 < f (b) − f (a) = f (b) − L − f (a) − L ≤ f (b) − L + f (a) − L < 1 2 + 1 2 = 1

(9)

Example

Prove that lim

x →0 sin

 1 x



does not exist.

y = sin 1 x



x y

As x approaches 0, the number x1 grows bigger, approaching infinity, so

sin 1x just bounces up and down, faster and faster the closer x gets to 0. Intuitively, we would guess that the limit does not exist, because sin 1x does not approach any single number as x approaches 0.

(10)

Limit Laws:

Our first limit law concerns the constant function f (x ) = a where a ∈ R. Its graph is a horizontal line with y-intercept a.

Theorem (Constant function rule)

If a ∈ R, then lim

x →c a = a.

The identity function f (x ) = x .

Theorem (Identity Function Rule)

If c ∈ R, then lim

(11)

Theorem (Constant multiple rule)

If lim

x →c f (x ) exists, and a ∈ R, then limx →c af (x ) = a limx →c f (x ).

Theorem (Sum rule)

If both lim

x →c f (x ) and limx →c g (x ) exist, then

lim

(12)

Theorem (Difference rule)

If both lim

x →c f (x ) and limx →c g (x ) exist, then

lim

x →c f (x ) − g (x ) = limx →c f (x ) − limx →cg (x ).

Theorem (Multiplication rule)

If both lim lim

x →c f (x ) and limx →c g (x ) exist, then

lim x →c f (x )g (x ) =  lim x →c f (x )  ·lim x →c g (x )  .

(13)

Theorem (Division Rule)

If both lim

x →cf (x ) and limx →cg (x ) exist, and limx →cg (x ) 6= 0, then

lim x →c f (x ) g (x ) = lim x →cf (x ) lim x →cg (x ) .

(14)

Example Find lim x →1 1 x − 1 1 − x.

Here x approaches 1, but simply plugging in x = 1 gives 1 1−1

1−1 = 0 0

(undefined). So we apply whatever algebra is needed to cancel the denominator 1 − x , and follow this with limit laws:

lim x →1 1 x − 1 1 − x = limx →1 1 x − 1 1 − x x x (multiply quotient by 1 = x x) = lim x →1 (1 − x ) (1 − x )x (distribute x on top) = lim x →1 1 x (cancel the (1 − x )) = lim x →11 lim x →1x = 1

Referanslar

Benzer Belgeler

Note that in the first five lines of the table, the sum of the first n odd numbers really does add up to n 2.. The table raises

Try to prove the following statement using strong

The proof combines the techniques of induction, cases, minimum counterexample and the idea of uniqueness of existence.. see for the full proof at page 192 of ”Book

A partition of a set A is a set of non-empty subsets of A, such that the union of all the subsets equals A, and the intersection of any two different subsets is ∅. Oktay ¨

How to spot the various properties of a relation from its

The pigeonhole principle is motivated by a simple thought experiment: Imagine there is a set A of pigeons and a set B of pigeonholes, and all the pigeons fly into the

If g is a function, then it must be bijective in order for its inverse relation g −1 to be a function.. Then f is bijective if and only if the inverse relation f −1 is a function from

The nth term is sometimes called the