• Sonuç bulunamadı

Innovative method for standardization of valve sparing aortic root surgery

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Innovative method for standardization of valve sparing aortic root surgery"

Copied!
2
0
0

Yükleniyor.... (view fulltext now)

Tam metin

(1)

53 Editorial Comment / Editoryal Yorum

Turkish Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2020;28(1):53-54

http://dx.doi.org/doi: 10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2020.01948

Innovative method for standardization of valve sparing aortic root surgery

Kapak koruyucu aort kök cerrahisinin standardizasyonunda yenilikçi yöntem

Egemen Tüzün

Received: January 06, 2020 Accepted: January 07, 2020 Published online: January 23, 2020

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Texas A&M Institute for Preclinical Studies, Texas, USA

Correspondence: Egemen Tüzün, MD., PhD. Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Texas A&M Institute for Preclinical Studies, Texas, USA.

Tel: 979 458-5754 e-mail: egemen.tuzun@tamu.edu

©2020 All right reserved by the Turkish Society of Cardiovascular Surgery.

Tüzün E. Innovative method for standardization of valve sparing aortic root surgery. Turk Gogus Kalp Dama 2020;28(1):53-54

Cite this article as:

In this current article by Elibol A.,[1] the author demonstrates a promising novel device for technical standardization of valve-sparing aortic root reimplantation (David Procedure) in patients undergoing surgery for aortic root aneurysms and aortic insufficiency. Although currently the most commonly used surgical technique for the repair of aortic root aneurysms is the Bentall procedure, en-bloc removal of the aortic root and the aortic valve is associated with severe complications such as prosthetic valve deterioration/failure, thrombosis, infection and/or anticoagulation related bleeding after the surgical procedure.[2] Therefore, preserving the aortic valve and remodeling the aortic root by David procedure have gained an increasing interest to avoid such complications in this group of patients.[3]

The David procedure was first described in 1992 and demonstrated very low in-hospital mortality (1%) and excellent 20-year survival (72%) and freedom from reoperation rates (96%).[4] On the other hand, it is well known that David operation is a very complex surgical intervention which requires increased myocardial ischemic times compared to the Bentall procedure.[2] As a result, it is recommended that surgeons should not attempt the David procedure until they have gathered a significant experience in the elective setting. Therefore, the requirement of these patient-specific anatomical measurements of the aortic root and valve, such as appropriate graft size, commissure and effective height, which are very difficult to estimate, arise as a discouraging factor in front of the less experienced cardiac surgeons. Thus, designing a device to make standard and accurate

measurements of the anatomical features of the aortic root and leaflet geometry becomes crucially important for the success of the David procedure, even in less experienced hands.

This novel device developed by Dr. Elibol would facilitate and standardize the aortic root and valve measurements in high precision and accuracy that has an utmost importance for the success of the David procedure. The standardization of the measurements independent of the surgeon’s subjective assessments would increase the success of the restoration of the aortic root and valve geometry, even in less experienced hands. The user-friendliness and cost-effectiveness of this device are the other advantages which makes it easily affordable for its routine use in David procedures. With some minor modifications, its application can be also extended to surgeries involving larger aortic annulus or bicuspid valve scenarios.

It was my pleasure and privilege to witness and contribute to Dr. Elibol’s preliminary studies in developing this device during his brief tenure at the Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas. I feel very proud and lucky to make acquaintance of this young surgeon and inventor as a colleague, friend, and compatriot. I am sure his ongoing/upcoming studies would further provide him recognition and prestige in the international device innovation field.

Dear Editor, please accept my humble appreciation and respect for allowing me to write an “Editorial Comment” to this important and promising device.

(2)

54

Turk Gogus Kalp Dama 2020;28(1):53-54

Declaration of conflicting interests

The authors declared no conflicts of interest with respect to the authorship and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The authors received no financial support for the research and/or authorship of this article.

REFERENCES

1. Elibol A. A novel device for technical standardization of valve-sparing aortic root reimplantation. Turk Gogus Kalp

Dama 2020;28:43-52.

2. Coselli JS, Volguina IV, LeMaire SA, Sundt TM, Connolly HM, Stephens EH, et al. Early and 1-year outcomes of aortic root surgery in patients with Marfan syndrome: a prospective, multicenter, comparative study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014;147:1758-66.

3. Leontyev S, Borger MA. David operation for type A aortic dissection: risks and rewards. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2017;52:325-326.

Referanslar

Benzer Belgeler

On admission, echocardiography showed prolapse of the conjoined cusp and severe aortic regurgitation (AR) accompanied by an eccentric jet (Fig.. Careful observation revealed a

In our paper, we stated that the patient had a huge thrombus material blocking the movement of the aortic valve with resultant severe aortic stenosis; this detection was made in

Transesophageal echocardiography demonstrates thick- ened and little calcified aortic valve and concomitant rheumatic involvement of the mitral valve in long-axis view of the

Treatment of aortic valve stenosis and gastrointestinal bleeding by transcatheter aortic valve implantation in Heyde syndrome.. Heyde sendromunda transkateter aort kapak

Transesophageal long-axis (A) and short-axis echocardio- graphic views (B) showing the aneurysm of the left coronary cusp of the aortic valve resembling cystic mass (arrows) (C)

(3) have reported that survival rate of patients with prosthetic aort valve at 20 years were 31,2 % -including 6,2 % operative mortality- in a series of 1100 S-E caged ball

the subannular sutures; (ii) by attaching commissure holders to the aortic commissures, positioning of the device and aortic resuspension; (iii) using an

Bilateral coronary ostial patch angioplasty with autologous pericardium in Takayasu arteritis: a case requiring replacement of the aortic valve and ascending