• Sonuç bulunamadı

When is the best time to mobilize patients after myocardial infarction? An issue that merits further research 552

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "When is the best time to mobilize patients after myocardial infarction? An issue that merits further research 552"

Copied!
1
0
0

Yükleniyor.... (view fulltext now)

Tam metin

(1)

To the Editor,

Myocardial infarction (MI) is the main cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide. It is a result of imbalance between the oxy-gen supply and demand. Physical activity is the main physiologi-cal factor that leads to an increase in the myocardial oxygen de-mand by increasing the heart rate, myocardial contractility, and ventricular work. Therefore, bed rest in the acute phase is an important part in the treatment of acute MI because it reduces the myocardial workload (1).

Although the benefits of bed rest in the acute phase of MI are well established, the best time of mobilization after MI is un-known and there is no consensus or specific guideline in this regards. In addition, the results of several reviews highlight a disparity in the duration of post-MI bed rest; for example, in two separate reviews, the time of immobilization after MI was repor- ted to be from 2 to 12 days (1) and 2 to 28 days (2).

Up to 2014, no specific guideline has been released about pa-tients’ mobilization after MI from any heart association around the world. After 2014, the American College of Cardiology/Ameri-can Heart Association (ACC/AHA) recommends at least 12–24 h of bed rest for patients with uncomplicated ST-elevation MI (3). However, it seems that there are different factors that play an important role in decision making about mobilizing patient after MI because a recent study found that the recommended time of bed rest after uncomplicated MI was 72 h and most patients were mobilized after 3 days (4). Despite differences in the time of bed rest and mobilization after MI, several studies have reported that the early mobilization could reduce mortality, depression, and HR variations (5) and help in an early return to work (2) after MI. In contrast, early mobilization may adversely affect MI pa-tient outcomes. Complications such as death, re-infarction, ar-rhythmia, dyspnea, and angina (2) have been reported.

Therefore, based on the available evidence, the optimal du-ration of bed rest and time of patient mobilization after MI re-main unclear and there is a crucial need for a valid and updated

guideline. Considering this, further studies could be conducted to determine the best time to mobilize a patient after MI. Other recommendations for further research include the following: ex-ploring the specific time of mobilization after complicated or un-complicated MI, investigating the demographic properties of MI patients that contribute to patient mobilization, and identifying strategies particularly effective in mobilizing the patients. Hassan Sharifi1,2, Amir Emami Zeydi1

1Student Research Committee, Department of Medical-Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences; Mashhad-Iran

2Department of Medical Surgical Nursing, Faculty Member, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Iranshahr University of Medical Sciences; Iranshahr-Iran

References

1. Herkner H, Arrich J, Havel C, Mullner M. Bed rest for acute uncom-plicated myocardial infarction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; 2: Cd003836. [Crossref]

2. Lopes JL, Santos JT, Lima SC, Barros ALBL. Mobilization and early hospital discharge for patients with acute myocardial infarction. Acta Paul Enferm 2008; 21: 345-50. [Crossref]

3. Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, Casey DE Jr, Ganiats TG, Holmes DR, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patient with Non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: ex-ecutive summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2014; 130: 2354-94. [Crossref]

4. Cortés OL, DiCenso A, McKelvie R. Mobilization patterns of pa-tients after an acute myocardial infarction a pilot study. Clin Nurs Res 2015; 24: 139-55. [Crossref]

5. Asgari MR, Jafarpoor H, Soleimani M, Ghorbani R, Askandarian R, Jafaripour I. Effects of early mobilization program on the heart rate and blood pressure of patients with myocardial infarction hospital-ized at the coronary care unit. Middle East J Rehabil Health Stud 2015; 2: e24168. [Crossref]

Address for Correspondence: Amir Emami Zeydi

School of Nursing and Midwifery, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Ebne-Sina Street, Mashhad; Khorasan-Iran

Phone: +989355952357 Fax: +985138591511 E-mail: emamizeydi@yahoo.com

©Copyright 2016 by Turkish Society of Cardiology - Available online at www.anatoljcardiol.com

DOI:10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2016.7237

When is the best time to mobilize

patients after myocardial infarction?

An issue that merits further research

Anatol J Cardiol 2016; 16: 547-52 Letters to the Editor

Referanslar

Benzer Belgeler

In this study, among patients with moderate or high car- diovascular risk who underwent moderate-risk surgical opera- tions, approximately one third had postoperative

Recurrent Coronary Thrombus in a Patient with Chronic Immune Thrombocytopenia with Treatment Using Eltrombopag. Garbe E, Andersohn F, Bronder E, Salama A, Klimpel A, Thomae M,

Objective: The present study aims to investigate whether the addition of homocysteine level to the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) risk score enhances its

In this study, we examined the expression levels of miRNA related to cardiac diseases in circulating blood among STEMI patients versus a control group to identify miRNA

The relationship between C-reactive protein and the lapse of time since the onset of the symptoms after acute myocardial infarction:.. an

Large-scale randomized clinical trials such as the Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation (HOPE) (4) and the European Trial on Reduction of Cardiac Events with Perindopril in

However, in our study, it is impor- tant that we detected the segments as necrotic by the end of the first month, even though there was no significant change in the first week

Araştırmaya göre “de” bağlacının ayrı yazılacağına öğretmenlerin %30’u dikkat etmiyor, % 18’i bazan bitişik, ba­ zan ayrı yazıyor, %23’ünün yazılarında