• Sonuç bulunamadı

LIST OF FIGURES

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "LIST OF FIGURES"

Copied!
3
0
0

Yükleniyor.... (view fulltext now)

Tam metin

(1)

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1.1 Model of spread spectrum digital communication system 2

Figure 1.2 Spread Spectrum Encoding [6]. 4

Figure 1.3 The Illustrative example of CDMA [4]. 6

Figure 1.4 Multiplication of Channel with Chip1 [4]. 7

Figure 2.1 Source and channel coding. 8

Figure 2.2 A discrete transmission channel [9]. 10

Figure 2.3 Convolution encoder diagram [8]. 15

Figure 2.4 Feedback connection polynomials [8]. 16

Figure 2.5 Trellis description of a convolutional encoder [8]. 17

Figure 2.6 Soft decision decoding [8]. 19

Figure 3.1 Interleaving example [18]. 23

Figure 3.2 Structure of block interleaver of length L

π

= 12 25

Figure 3.3 Block interleaver example [18]. 27

Figure 3.4 Shift registration implementation of a convolutional

interleaver/deinterleaver [18]. 29

Figure 3.5 Convolutional interleaver/deinterleaver examples [18]. 30 Figure 4.1 Bit error probability for DS-SS with BPSK modulation over

an AWGN channel with E

b

/N

0

= 8.4 dB and with broadband

noise jamming of varying power. 36

Figure 4.2 Demodulator for DS-SS with BPSK modulation with rectangular chip

waveform. 37

Figure 4.3 Dispreading operation in the presence of narrowband jamming. 38 Figure 4.4 Bit error probability for BPSK-modulated DS-SS with

pulsed noise jamming with duty cycle ρ [23]. 41

Figure 4.5 Plot of (4.20) vs. E

b

/N

I

, parametric in γ, for E

b

/N

0

= 13 dB [23]. 42 Figure 4.6 Plot of (4.20) vs. E

b

/N

I

, parametric in γ, for E

b

/N

0

= 10 dB [23]. 43 Figure 5.1 Performance as a function of interleaver delay for random

and block interleavers [30]. 48

Figure 5.2 Block diagram of DS-SS communication system. 49 Figure 5.3 Performance of interleavers for convolutional encoded DS-SS

(Block length=400 bits, SNR=10 dB, jamming duty cycle ρ=0.5

and

E /b NJ

= SIR=0 – 6dB). 50

Figure 5.4 Performance of DS-SS system with and without interleaving and encoding.

(Block length=400 bits, SNR=10 dB, jamming duty cycle ρ=0.5

and

E /b NJ

= SIR=0 – 6dB). 51

viii

(2)

Figure 5.5 Performance of interleavers in convolutional encoded DS-SS for various block lengths, (SNR=10 dB, SIR=1dB, jamming duty cycle

0.5

and block length=300-1400 bits). 52

Figure 5.6 Performance of DS-SS system with and without interleaving for

various block lengths (same parameters as in Figure 5.5). 52 Figure 5.7 Performance of interleavers in convolutional encoded DS-SS for various

block lengths, (SNR=10 dB, SIR=6 dB, jamming duty cycle

0.5

and block length=300-1400 bits). 53

Figure 5.8 Performance of DS-SS system with and without interleaving for various

block lengths (same parameters as in Figure 5.7). 53 Figure C.1 The performance of interleavers with convolutional encoder for DS-SS

(Frame length=400 bits, SNR=10 dB, ρ=0.5 and SIR=0 – 6 dB). 71 Figure C.2 Performance of DS-SS system with and without interleaving and encoding.

(Block length=400 bits, SNR=10 dB, jamming duty cycle (ρ=0.5)

and

E /b NJ

= SIR=0 – 6 dB). 72

Figure C.3 Performance of interleavers in convolutional encoded DS-SS for various block lengths, (SNR=10 dB, SIR=1 dB,

0.5

and

block length=300-1400 bits). 73

Figure C.4 The performance of interleavers in convolutional encoded DS-SS for various block lengths, (SNR=10 dB, SIR=2 dB,

0.5

and block length=300-1400 bits). 74

Figure C.5 Performance of interleavers in convolutional encoded DS-SS for various block lengths, (SNR=10 dB, SIR=3 dB,

0.5

and

block length=300-1400 bits). 75

Figure C.6 The performance of interleavers with convolutional encoder for DS-SS (SNR=10 dB, SIR=4 dB, ρ=0.5 and frame length=300-1400 bits). 76 Figure C.7 The performance of interleavers with convolutional encoder for DS-SS

(SNR=10 dB, SIR=5 dB, duty cycle jamming (ρ=0.5)

and frame length=300-1400 bits). 77

Figure C.8 The performance of interleavers with convolutional encoder for DS-SS (SNR=10 dB, SIR=6 dB, ρ=0.5, and frame length=300-1400 bits,

BER= x1.0e-003). 78

ix

(3)

x

Referanslar

Benzer Belgeler

40 Figure 5.5: Operation of end points detection (a) Source signal, (b) End points detected

Time performance results with different similarity thresholds in terms of time per- formance, number of constructed clusters, number of unclustered tweets, average intra-

SEM micrographs of sol-Au nanoparticles (left) and sol-LiF nanoparticles (right) after a single deposition on ITO coated glass. The scale bar represents 200 nm. Ow-Yang,

Keywords: angular motion estimation, Euler angles, angular rates, IMU, sensor fusion, Kalman filter, ballbot, stabilization, acceleration control, balancing control Reliable

While the search server stores the secure index generated by the data owner as explained in Section 6.3.1, the file server stores the actual encrypted data elements and knows

Until now, we reviewed that scale free networks have almost power-law distributed degree, shortest-path betweenness and random walk betweenness distributions, and

Figure 3.6 Overall Raman scattering spectra of pristine and 16 hour-ozone treated samples including OD-MWNTs, OW-MWNTs, SOD-MWNTs. 43 Figure 3.9 Change in surface composition of

Table 5.1: The time consumed by a hologram reconstruction using angular spectrum method and the time consumed by a sharpness estimation using normalized-variance and