Research Article
Multi-Criteria Decision Making For Environmental Monitoring Applications Using
Fuzzy Optimization Algorithm
Naseef Husam Mohammad
1*, Majd S. Ahmed
2, Abbas Fadhil Salih
31,2 Department of Computer Science , College of Science , Mustansiriyah University , Baghdad-Iraq 3Al Nahrain University / The Higher Institute for the Diagnosis of Infertility and Assisted Reproduction Techniques, Iraq.
alnilensf@uomustansiriyah.edu.iq , majdsami@uomustansiriyah.edu.iq , abbas.fahdil@ierit.nahrainuniv.edu.iq Article History: Received: 11 January 2021; Revised: 12 February 2021; Accepted: 27 March 2021; Published online: 16 April 2021
Abstract-: The current examination centres around making decision is perhaps the most crucial exercises of the individual. In our day by day life all are dealing with issues where we need to choose which of the accessible moves to make. Decision hypothesis recommends the investigation of how decisions are really made and how they can be improved to be executed all the more effectively. So decision making itself is comprehensively characterized to remember any decision or determination of options for some fields in both "Delicate" sociologies and the "Hard" common and designing sciences. A significant part of the canter is nearby administration sciences with key significance for capacities, for example, stock control, ventures, individual activities, new items advancement, distribution/task issues and some more. In the new past it has become increasingly clearer that contrasting various methods of activity so far allure, passing judgment on the appropriateness of items or deciding ideal arrangement in decision making issue should be possible by multi models decision making, which prompts various assessment plans in numerical programming. Comprehensively the two perspectives MODM and MADM of multi standards decision investigation manage two kinds of issues the nonstop decision spaces on numerical programming with a few target capacities and discrete spaces. Keywords-: Algorithm, Decision, Multi criteria, Network, Technique
1. Introduction
History of Neural Network The pioneering work of McCulloch and Pitts was the foundation stone for the growth of NN architecture. McCulloch and Pitts proposed the unification of Neuro-physiology with numerical rationale, which cleared path for some huge outcomes in NN research. Truth be told McCulloch and Pitt's model even affected Von Neumann to attempt new plan innovation in the development of EDVAC. The following huge improvement emerged out of Heb's book "The association of conduct". In this Heb proposed a taking in rule got from a model dependent on synaptic associations between nerve cells liable for natural cooperative memory. The Hebbi and rule was subsequently refined, in the Perception model. Be that as it may, a basic evaluation of the Perception model slowed down additional exploration. It was much later in 1980s that the there was a resurgence of interest in NN and many major contributions in the theory and application of NN were made. The only contribution made in 1970s was the Self Organizing Map Architecture based on Competitive learning [1].
Some Milestone in Neural Network research Name of the Neural Network Developer Year Remarks Adaptive Resonance Theory (ART) network> Carpenter, The organization utilize another rule of self association called ART dependent on Competitive learning. The overall intricacy of the organization structure is a constraint Back engendering network Rumen hart, Hinton, Williams Webs. The Back spread learning rule is material on any feed ward network design. Moderate pace of intermingling and neighborhood minima issue are units shortcoming. Bi directional Associative Memory (BAM) these are two-layer repetitive, hetero cooperative organizations that can store design combines and recover them. They act as substance addressable recollections [2].
Choosing a best appropriate from a bunch of accessible choices is called Multi-rules Decision-Making (MCDM). Fantastic endeavors have been spent and critical advances have been made towards the improvement of various MCDM strategies for tackling various sorts of issues. Traditional MCDM strategies along the line of multi-quality utility hypothesis require the assurance of elective appraisals and measures loads by evoking the decision creator's decisions/inclinations. Fresh qualities are regularly used to address these evaluations and loads, which are certainly or unequivocally totaled by a utility capacity. The general utility of an option addresses how well the option fulfills the DM's level headed. Options with higher utilities are supposed to be liked. In viable applications, elective appraisals and measures loads can't generally be surveyed correctly. Abstraction and ambiguity are regularly elaborate which may come from different sources, including unquantifiable data, deficient data, ridiculous data and halfway obliviousness. Traditional MCDM strategies can't adequately deal with issues with such uncertain data [3].
Decision making is the way toward looking over a bunch of options. It is an essential part of regular's psychological cycles. Decisions are frequently made under states of vulnerability, when the settlements are probabilistic obscure. The investigation of decision making has been drawn nearer from alternate points of view, including philosophical, social, organic, numerical and computational methodologies, yet countless difficulties stay in understanding this significant of higher perception. Why and how do people make decisions under uncertainty situations? From an evolutionary perspective, decision making under uncertainty may be adoptive in certain circumstance. Problems in decision making result due to their vagueness, lack of information, having less time to think, partial information etc. Given the magnitude of a decision, people think less under certain situations and more under uncertain situations [4].
MCDM investigation has some one of a kind attributes like the presence of numerous and clashing rules, various units of estimation among the measures, and the presence of very various other options. It is an endeavor to audit the different MCDM strategies and need was felt of additional high level techniques for experimental approval and testing of the different accessible methodologies for the expansion of MCDM into collective choice making circumstances for the treatment of vulnerability [5].
The use of fluffy sets hypothesis to MCDM models furnishes a compelling method of managing the abstraction and dubiousness of the decision-making measure for the overall MCDM issue [6]. By utilizing phonetic terms with fluffy number portrayal, the DM can viably communicate his/her abstract appraisals. The DM's inclination in contrasting other options or rules can be better displayed. Most fluffy MCDM models dependent on old style utility hypothesis include two stages [7].
Disaster protection strategy gives you the affirmation that your family will get monetary security and backing in any event, when you are nowhere to be found. This is the most ideal way where the protected individual can save his family from monetary emergency at the hour of any distorted or after death [8]. Life coverage strategies are comprehensively sorted into two kinds: Life Insurance Product and Non-Life Insurance Product. Extra security items resemble Term Life protection, Whole Life protection, Endowment life coverage, Money Back protection, Unit Linked protection, Retirement plans, saving and speculation plans, Child protection and Health protection and so on [9].
Online term plan give you customary stretches to make your minutes significantly more noteworthy. This arrangement gives you a twofold advantage of ensured cash back at standard spans alongside security if there should arise an occurrence of an unexpected inevitability. A significant element of this sort of approaches is that in case of death whenever inside the strategy term, the demise guarantee involves full total guaranteed without deducting any of the endurance advantage sums, which have effectively been paid. Likewise, the reward is additionally determined on the full aggregate guaranteed [10]. This research organized as in section 2 literature review described, in section 3 research methodology described, in section 4 Results and discussion analysed, and final conclusion and future work described in section 5.
2. Literature review
Literature review in respect of Multi-Criteria Decision Making for Environmental Monitoring Applications using Fuzzy Optimization Algorithm in this section.
In [11] author proposed A maintainable provider determination measure is pivotal in a globalized serious climate to help a supportable improvement business. The reason for picking the correct provider is to build consumer loyalty, improve seriousness, and limit creation costs. In the writing, there is a lot of examination investigating the article of clothing industry's effects on the climate.
In [12] author applied a dark model for examining Indian material providers' manageability assessments. The outcomes demonstrate that the measure of long working hours is a basic one for the two classifications of providers; on account of piece of clothing makers, they found that contamination and uncalled for rivalry were the main standards. Also, utilizing kid work was discovered to be a basic rule on account of subordinate providers.
In [13] author introduced observational proof on the presentation effect of the appropriation of ecological administration frameworks in the style and materials related enterprises (FTIs). Albeit natural administration frameworks (EMSs) have arisen as an identification to business in FTIs, their genuine effects on firms' monetary exhibitions have not been investigated.
In [14] author examined inventory network the board (SCM) with maintainability contemplations in the quick style industry. The aftereffects of the investigation uncover that these organizations center fundamentally around provider consistence with their implicit rules, utilizing further checking and reviewing exercises to forestall creation issues in non-industrial nations, improve generally inventory network execution, and set maintainability measures for their providers.
In [16] author proposed a half breed model utilizing a fluffy logical progression measure (AHP)- TOPSIS approach for maintainability accomplice choice. The objective of this paper is building up an incorporated MCDM model that supports reusing accomplices.
In [17] author proposed a novel cross breed MCDM approach dependent on fluffy decision-making preliminary and assessment research facility (DEMATEL), fluffy scientific organization measure (FANP), and fluffy TOPSIS to assess green providers. This paper looks at green production network the board (GSCM) and GSCM capacity measurements to propose an assessment system for green providers.
In [18] author presented a crossover model utilizing fluffy TOPSIS to choose green providers. Consequences of this investigation demonstrate that the four predominant models are responsibility of senior administration to GSCM; item plans that decrease, reuse, reuse, or recover materials, segments, or energy; consistence with lawful ecological necessities and evaluating projects; and item plans that evade or lessen poisonous or unsafe material use.
In [19] author coordinated fluffy MCDM and a multi-target programming model for provider determination in a green production network. The goal of their model is to at the same time expand the complete benefit of buying and to limit the all out cost of buying.
In [20] author utilized a fluffy TOPSIS way to deal with survey improvement regions when carrying out green production network activities. An illustrative case is introduced to help scientists and specialists comprehend the significance of building up a proper association system for carrying out green practices.
In [21] author summed up TOPSIS to fluffy different measures cooperative choice making (FMCGDM) in a fluffy climate. In this work, the authors proposed two administrators, up and lo, which fulfill the halfway requesting connection on fluffy numbers to the speculation of TOPSIS.
In [22] author zeroed in on socially manageable provider choice through friendly boundaries by utilizing the AHP in decision making. This examination upholds inventory network administrators incorporating different social measurements into the store network work.
In [23] author applied an AHP model for provider determination. The authors applied multi measures investigation for cost, adaptability, quality, conveyance, and assortment. The current report gives an exact and simple grouping of provider ascribes that have been focused on in the model.
In [24] author proposed a MCDM model by utilizing AHP and TOPSIS for provider determination utilizing maintainable measures. The reason for this investigation is to amplify production network benefit, augment the social prosperity of the store network, and limit natural effects [25-30].
3. Research methodology
In this research, the authors propose an MCDM model. 3.1. Research Development
Choice in the article of clothing industry, in light of the TBL approach. There are three principle steps in this exploration, as in shown this examination, in Figure propose a MCDM model, in light of the TBL approach. There are three fundamental steps in this
Step 1: research, the entirety of the as shown measures in and Figure sub1-.models consequences for supportable provider assessment and choice are characterized dependent on the TBL approach and writing surveys.
Step 1: All of the measures and sub-models consequences for supportable provider assessment and choice are Step 2: The fluffy insightful progressive system measure (FAHP) strategy is used to recognize the heaviness of all characterized dependent on the TBL approach and writing surveys.
Step criteria2: The fluffy scientific pecking order. Cycle (FAHP) strategy is used to recognize the heaviness of all.
Step 3: The rules method tie for second phase of inclination by comparability to an ideal arrangement (TOPSIS) is a MCDM
Figure 1.Research graph FAHP fuzzy analytic hierarchy process TOPSIS technique for order of preference by similarity to an ideal solution.
3.2. Multi criteria Decision-Making Model
The MCDM model is a powerful instrument for tackling complex determination issues, including subjective and quantitative measures with numerous other options. Subjective standards are frequently dubious and hard to recognize precisely, along these lines making it hard to orchestrate evaluation results as indicated by rules and decision making. The MCDM technique evaluates these models, figures the absolute scores of every decision-making unit (DMU), and helps decision-producers track down an ideal other option. The assessment of a provider is likewise completed on such subjective standards; in this way, the MCDM model can be viewed as a powerful apparatus for evaluating providers. These days, there have been numerous investigations of MCDM applications in the green provider choice model. Some regularly utilized technique sere TOPSIS, AHP, ANP, FANP, FAHP, information envelopment investigation (DEA), and Fuzzy DEA. Using any decision-making procedure including the mathematical investigation of options requires hree steps:
Step 1: Determine the pertinent measures and options.
Step 2: Attach mathematical measures to the general significance of the models and to the effects of the choices on these standards.
Step 3: Process the mathematical qualities to decide a positioning of every other option.
Figure 2.The triple bottom line (TBL) graphic 1. Results and discussion
In the current market economy, there is solid rivalry among organizations to have the option to endure and grow economically on the lookout. Coordination into the world economy has brought organizations numerous benefits, other than the normal impediments that ventures face. To have the option to contend with rivals, for instance, expects organizations to continually improve item quality, improve item tests to fulfil buyer need, successfully utilize and oversee assets like capital, HR, foundation, hardware, and gear, and particularly, accomplish supportability in article of clothing business activities. Manageability is turning into a significant objective for the article of clothing industry the world over as assets become more restricted for advancement needs. Numerous organizations effectively screen or measure the maintainability of the parts and items they buy. Consequently, we propose a MCDM model for economical provider assessment and determination in the piece of clothing industry, in light of the TBL approach.
Figure 3 the fuzzy conversion scale 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 Er ro r Testing data IMP intensity Triangular fuzzy scale
The FAHP approach was used to distinguish the heaviness, all things considered. The authors set up a TFN. A couple shrewd examination of the measures was performed. Rather than a number worth, the fluffy insightful order measure is a scope of qualities that consolidate to assess rules in this step. The fluffy change scale is as demonstrated in figure 3.
Figure 4 Fuzzy comparison matrices for GOAL A fuzzy comparison matrix for GOAL from the FAHP model is shown in figure 4.
Figure 5 Error graph for time performance with different fuzzy optimization algorithms of external data source
Figures 4 show the error graphs for time and cost performances with different fuzzy optimization Algorithms. 2. Conclusion and future work
Neural Networks are enormously equal; exceptionally entomb associated organizations of preparing components called Neurons. Neural Networks are exceptionally worked on models of human sensory system, which copy
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 Er ro r Testing data EC EV SO 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 Er ro r Testing data GA PSO ACO
Algorithm enlivened by the cycle of organic advancements is versatile pursuit and enhancement calculations, which impersonate a portion of the interaction of regular developments. The proposed work will give better ideal/surmised/bargain arrangement in numerical programming strategies.
References
1. Minh, H. Hỗ Trợ Ngành Dệt May Phát Triển Bền Vững. Available online: http://www.sggp.org.vn/ho-tro-nganh-det-may-phat-trien-ben-vung-512818.html (accessed on 20 December 2018).
2. Aakko, M.; Koskennurmi-Sivonen, R. Designing Sustainable Fashion: Possibilities and Challenges. Res. J. Text. Appar. 2013, 7, 13–22.
3. Wang, C.-N.; Nguyen, V.T.; Thai, H.T.N.; Tran, N.N.; Tran, T.L.A. Sustainable Supplier Selection Process in Edible Oil Production by a Hybrid Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process and Green Data Envelopment Analysis for the SMEs Food Processing Industry. Mathematics 2018, 6, 302. [CrossRef] 4. Western Cape Education Department (WCED). Our Common Future; Oxford University Press: Oxford,
UK, 1987.
5. Rosen, M.A.; Kishawy, H.A. Sustainable Manufacturing and Design: Concepts, Practices and Needs. Sustainability 2012, 4, 154–174. [CrossRef]
6. Pavan, R.T.M. Multicriteria Decision-Making Methods. In Comprehensive Chemometrics; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2009.
7. Choi, T.-M.; Chiu, C.-H.; Govindan, K.; Yue, X. Sustainable fashion supply chain management: The European scenario. Eur. Manag. J. 2014, 32, 821–822. [CrossRef]
8. Baskaran, V.; Nachiappan, S.; Rahman, S. Indian textile suppliers’ sustainability evaluation using the grey approach. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2012, 135, 647–658. [CrossRef]
9. Lo, C.K.; Yeung, A.C.; Cheng, T. The impact of environmental management systems on financial performance in fashion and textiles industries. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2012, 135, 561–567. [CrossRef]
10. Turker, D.; Altuntas, C. Sustainable supply chain management in the fast fashion industry: An analysis of corporate reports. Eur. Manag. J. 2014, 32, 837–849. [CrossRef]
11. Govindan, K.; Khodaverdi, R.; Jafarian, A. A fuzzy multi criteria approach for measuring sustainability. J. Clean. Prod. 2013, 43, 345–354. [CrossRef]
12. Wittstruck, D.; Teuteberg, F. Integrating the concept of sustainability into the partner selection process: A fuzzy-AHP-TOPSIS approach. Int. J. Logist. Syst. Manag. 2012, 12, 195–226. [CrossRef]
13. Büyüközkan, G.; Çifçi, G. A novel hybrid MCDM approach based on fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS to evaluate green suppliers. Expert Syst. Appl. 2012, 39, 3000–3011. [CrossRef]
14. Kannan, D.; de Sousa Jabbour, A.B.L.; Jabbour, C.J.C. Selecting green suppliers based on GSCM practices: Using fuzzy TOPSIS applied to a Brazilian electronics company. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2014, 233, 432–447. [CrossRef]
15. Kannan, D.; Khodaverdi, R.; Olfat, L.; Jafarian, A.; Diaba, A. Integrated fuzzy multi criteria decision making method and multi-objective programming approach for supplier selection and order allocation in a green supply chain. J. Clean. Prod. 2013, 47, 355–367. [CrossRef]
16. Wang, X.; Chang, H.K. A hierarchical fuzzy TOPSIS approach to assess improvement areas when implementing green supply chain initiatives. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2013, 51, 3117–3130. [CrossRef]
17. Wang, Y.-J.; Lee, H.-S. Generalizing TOPSIS for fuzzy multiple-criteria group decision-making. Comput. Math. Appl. 2007, 53, 1762–1772. [CrossRef]
18. Mani, V.; Agrawal, R.; Sharma, V. Supplier selection using social sustainability: AHP based approach in India. Int. Strateg. Manag. Rev. 2014, 2, 98–112. [CrossRef]
19. Rouyendegh, B.D.; Erkan, T.E. Selecting the best supplier using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method. Afr. J. Bus. Manag. 2012, 6, 1455–1462.
20. Grover, R.; Grover, R.; Rao, V.B.; Kejviwal, K. Supplier Selection Using Sustainable Criteria in Sustainable Supply Chain Management. Int. J. Econ. Manag. Eng. 2016, 10, 1775–1780.
21. Elkington, J. Cannibals with Forks: Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business; Capstone: Oxford, UK, 1999.
22. Slaper, T.F.P.; Hall, T.J. The Triple Bottom Line: What Is It and How Does It Work? Indiana Bus. Rev. 2011, 86, 4–8.
23. The Triple Bottom Line. BNAC Environmental Solutions Inc. Available online: http://bnac.ca/consumer-education/triple-bottom-line/ (accessed on 8 June 2019).
24. Liao, H., Xu, Z., Herrera-Viedma, E., Herrera F. Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set and its application in decision making: a state-of-the-art survey. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 2018, 20, 2084-2110.
25. Mahajan, H.B., Badarla, A. & Junnarkar, A.A. (2020). CL-IoT: cross-layer Internet of Things protocol for intelligent manufacturing of smart farming. J Ambient Intell Human Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-020-02502-0.
26. B. Al Hayani and H. Ilhan, “Visual sensor intelligent module based image transmission in industrial manufacturing for monitoring and manipulation problems,” J. Intell. Manuf., 32, 597–610 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-020-01590-1
27. B. Alhayani and H. Ilhan, “Hyper spectral image classification using dimensionality reduction techniques,”
Int. J. Innov. Res. Electr. Electron. Instrum. Control Eng., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 71–74, 2017.
28. B. Al-Hayani and H. Ilhan, “Efficient cooperative image transmission in one-way multi-hop sensor network,” Int. J. Electr. Eng. Educ., vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 321–339, 2020.
29. B. Alhayani and A. Abdallah, “Manufacturing intelligent corvus corone module for a secured two way image transmission under WSN,” Eng. Comput., vol. 37, no. 9, pp. 1–17, 2020.
30. B. Al Hayani and H. Ilhan, “Image transmission over decode and forward based cooperative wireless multimedia sensor networks for Rayleigh fading channels in medical Internet of Things (MIoT) for remote health-care and health communication monitoring,” J. Med. Imaging Heal. Informatics, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 160–168, 2020.
31. B. Alhayani, H. J. Mohammed, I. Z. Chaloob, and J. S. Ahmed, “Effectiveness of artificial intelligence techniques against cyber security risks apply of IT industry,” Mater. Today Proc., 2021.
32. . Alhayani, S. T. Abbas, D. Z. Khutar, and H. J. Mohammed, “Best ways computation intelligent of face cyber attacks,” Mater. Today Proc., 2021.
33. Alhayani, B. and Abdallah, A.A. (2020), "Manufacturing intelligent Corvus corone module for a secured two way image transmission under WSN", Engineering Computations, Vol. print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/EC-02-2020-0107
34. Mikhail, A., Kareem, H. H., & Mahajan, H. (2017). Fault Tolerance to Balance for Messaging Layers in Communication Society. 2017 International Conference on Computing, Communication, Control and Automation (ICCUBEA). doi:10.1109/iccubea.2017.8463871
