ContentslistsavailableatScienceDirect
Applied
Surface
Science
j o ur na l ho me pa g e :w w w . e l s e v i e r . c o m / l o c a t e / a p s u s c
Co
doping
induced
structural
and
optical
properties
of
sol–gel
prepared
ZnO
thin
films
Ebru
Gungor
a,∗,
Tayyar
Gungor
a,
Deniz
Caliskan
b,
Abdullah
Ceylan
c,
Ekmel
Ozbay
baEnergySystemsEngineeringDepartment,MehmetAkifErsoyUniversity,Burdur15030,Turkey bNanotechnologyResearchCenter,BilkentUniversity,Ankara06800,Turkey
cSNTGLaboratory,PhysicsEngineeringDepartment,HacettepeUniversity,Ankara06800,Turkey
a
r
t
i
c
l
e
i
n
f
o
Articlehistory:
Received15November2013 Receivedinrevisedform14June2014 Accepted20June2014
Availableonline27June2014 Keywords:
ZnO Co:ZnO Thinfilm
Ultrasonicspraypyrolysis
a
b
s
t
r
a
c
t
ThepreparationconditionsforCodopingprocessintotheZnOstructurewerestudiedbytheultrasonic spraypyrolysistechnique.StructuralandopticalpropertiesoftheCo:ZnOthinfilmsasafunctionofCo concentrationswereexamined.ItwasobservedthathexagonalwurtzitestructureofZnOisdominantup tothecriticalvalue,andafterthevalue,thecubicstructuralphaseofthecobaltoxideappearsintheX-ray diffractionpatterns.Everyband-edgeofCo:ZnOfilmsshiftstothelowerenergiesandallareconfirmed withthePLmeasurements.CosubstitutioninZnOlatticehasbeenprovedbytheopticaltransmittance measurementwhichisobservedasthelossoftransmissionappearinginspecificregionduetoCo2+
characteristictransitions.
©2014ElsevierB.V.Allrightsreserved.
1. Introduction
Zinc oxide(ZnO)isa II–VIcompound semiconductor witha
widedirectbandgapof3.37eVatroomtemperature.Inaddition
totheelectricalandopticalpropertiesofundopedZnO,the
tran-sitionmetaldopedZnOformsarepromisingcandidatematerials
inthefieldofspintronics(spin-electronics).Variousmethodssuch
aspulsedlaserdeposition[1],chemicalvaportransport[2],
elec-trodeposition[3],co-precipitation[4]andsolid-statereaction[5],
andspraypyrolysis[6]canbeusedtosynthesizeZnO.Amongthese
methods,spraypyrolysistechniquecanbeapplicablewithout
vac-uumenvironment;ofcourse,thistechniqueischeapanddisplaying
comparablepropertiesandcompetitivefunctionalitywiththat
pro-ducedbyothertechniques.Theresearchhasbeenincreasedon
theternarysemiconductorssuchastransitionmetaldopedZnO
owingtoitshighCurietemperaturefortheferromagnetic
tran-sitioncalculatedinbulkmaterialsandfoundtobearound300K
[7–10].
CodopingcreatesaconsiderablechangeinthebandgapofZnO
[11–14],butthisvariationhasbeenreportedasanincreaseinsome
otherresearchandasadecreaseinthebandgapforZnOinother
research.Thiscaseindicatestheuncertainty.Areasonforthiscan
bestructuraldefectsintheZnOcrystallatticeaswellasbecause
∗ Correspondingauthor.
E-mailaddress:egungor@mehmetakif.edu.tr(E.Gungor).
ofthevacanciesinthecrystalstructure orinterstitials[15].The
uncontrolledcasesasthestructuraldefectsand/orimpuritiesthat
ariseasgrowingthefilmaffectsthebondingnature,chargetransfer
andthebandstructureinthematerial.Thismakesitverydifficult
toobtainreproducible deviceperformance andreliability.Some
authorsreportedintheliteraturethatred-shiftisattributedtothe
sp–dexchangeandsomeotherauthorsobservedthatblue-shiftis
attributedtotheBurnstein–MosseffectconsideringtheCo
con-centration.Whenthevolumesolubilitylimitintwo-component
andmulticomponentalloyshasreacheda certainconcentration,
thefirstphaseremainsconstantandthentheextraphasesappear.
In ordertodeterminethesolubilitylimit,onehastofollowthe
changeofthelatticespacingandconcentrationobtainedfromthe
X-raydiffraction(XRD)andSEM-EDSspectrum,respectively.There
isuncertaintyaboutsolubilitylimitforCodopedZnO.Leeetal.
[16]reportedthatthedopedCoionwasfullysubstitutedintoa
ZnOlatticeat5mol%,butthesecondaryphaseoftheCo3O4was
formedabove5mol%ofCodoping.However,otherreports[17,18]
haveindicatedthatCocanbeincorporatedinthematrixofZnOup
to7–10at%withoutforminganysecondphase.Allthesereports
thusindicatethatCohasalimitedsolubilityinZnOupto10at%.In
contrasttothis,Rath[19]observedthatallthepeaksmatchwell
withthewurtzitestructureofZnOinbothpureandCodopedZnO
samplesuptoacobaltconcentrationof20%.
Inthisstudy,weaimedtocontributetoclarifytheuncertainty
forbandgapshift.Thatiswhy,weinvestigatethestructuraland
opticalpropertiesofZnOandCo:ZnO(CZO)thinfilmsthatwere
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.06.132 0169-4332/©2014ElsevierB.V.Allrightsreserved.
ZnOandCo:ZnO(CZO)thinfilmsweredepositedonto
ultrason-icallycleanedglasssubstratesusingtheultrasonicspraypyrolysis
(USP)method.Forconventional USPmethod,thesubstratesare
fixedandprecursorsolutionsprayedoverahotsubstrate.The
sub-stratetemperaturewaskeptat 400◦C. Thesaltsofzinc acetate
dehydrate(Zn(CH3COO)2·2H2O,99.9%-Merck)andcobaltacetate
tetrahydrate(Co(CH3COO)2·4H2O,99.9%-Merck)wereusedasthe
metalsourceswhich weresolvedin methanol.Inorder to
pro-duceaclearandhomogeneoussolutionmonoethanolamine(MEA)
andaceticacidwereaddedintotheprecursorsolutionwhichwas
stirredat60◦Catamoderatespeedfor1h.Inthestarting
solu-tions,Cocontentswerechangedfrom0.01Mto0.05Mandsamples
werelabeledasCZO1–CZO5(Table1).Zncontent(0.05M)washeld
atconstant.Thesolutionflowratewasheldconstantat5ml/min.
Nozzle,100kHzoscillatorfrequency,usedinthisstudywasina
downwardverticalconfigurationandthenozzletosubstrate
dis-tancewas12cm.Compressedairwasusedasthecarriergas.The
filmsweredepositedforabout10min.Amoredetaileddescription
ofthemethodtoobtainthethinfilmsandthecharacteristicsof
thespraypyrolysisdeviceusedwerereportedinpreviouspaper
[6].X-raydiffraction(XRD)spectrawerecollectedwithaD-Max
X-raydiffractometer(RigakuInternationalCorp.,Japan)withCuK␣
(=1.5405 ´˚A)toobtainthestructuralinformationofthefilms.The
chemicalcompositionofthethinfilmswasmeasuredusingenergy
dispersivespectroscopy(EDS)withaJeolJSM-7000F-EDSelectron
microscope.TheopticalmeasurementsoftheCo:ZnOthin films
werecarriedoutatroomtemperatureusingT70Model
Spectropho-tometer(PG Instrument) inthe wavelengthrange 300–900nm.
Photoluminescence(PL)spectraweremeasuredusinga100mW
He-Cdlaser(=325nm)astheexcitationsourceanda HORIBA
Jobin-Yvon1mmonochromator.
3. Resultsanddiscussion
3.1. Structuralproperties
TheX-raypatternsforCo:ZnOthinfilmsatroomtemperature
andreferencepeakpositionsarepresentedinFig.1a.Theresults
pointedout showedthat thereisnoimpurity and/orunreacted
phaseofZnandCoconsideringthereferencepeakpositions,(100),
(002),(101),and(103)peaksofZnOwereobserved.However,
(111)and(200)peaksat36.9◦ and42.7◦ Braggangleofcobalt
oxide,respectively, were observed.The starting molarity up to
0.03MofprecursorsolutionincludedCo,(002)peakofhexagonal
wurtzitestructurebecomesmoreintensivecomparingwithother
peaks(Fig.1b).Inthesefilms,upto0.03M,thehexagonalwurtzite
structureofZnOseemstobeprotected.Inthedopingprocess,itis
observedthatthereisalimitationofCodopingintotheZnO
struc-ture.Themolarityisthengreaterand/orequaltothe0.03Mvalue,
Fig.1.X-raydiffractionpatternsofCo:ZnOthinfilms(a),andintensitydifferences of(002)and(200)peaksforthefilms(b).“|”and“”symbolsindicatethereference forZnO(JCPDS36-1451)andforCoO(JCPDS43-1004),respectively.Thevariation oftheCoconcentrationobtainedfromEDSwithstartingsolutionmolarity(c).
(200)peakwhichbelongstothecubicstructureofcobaltoxide
whichthenstartstooccur.ThislimitvalueisconfirmedusingEDS
measurements.Table1summarizestherelativechemicalcontent
oftheoxygen,zincandcobaltpresentinthefilmsasafunctionof
contentofthecobaltacetatetetrahydrateinsertedinthestarting
solution.We observedthattheCosubstitutedZnsiteupto12%
(Fig.1c)whichcorrespondedto0.03Mwithoutshowinganyextra
phaseinXRDspectra.Peakscorrespondingtotheglasssubstrate
elementssuchasSiandCawerealsodetected.The(002)peak
indi-catingastrongorientationalongthec-axisofZnOwithhexagonal
wurtzitestructureisreplacedby(200)orientationwiththecubic
Fig.2.StructuralparametersofCo:ZnOthinfilmsaccordingtotheXRDresultsvs Comolarity;forc-latticeparameter(“䊉”symbol)anddiffractionangle2for(002) peak(“”symbol).
Fig.3. NormalizedexperimentalopticaltransmissionspectraforCo:ZnOthinfilms accordingtotransmissionvalueat800nm.
tothehigherBraggangle,andalsothecalculatedc-lattice
parame-terdecreasesduetotheincreasingofCoconcentrationintheZnO
structure(Fig.2).Buttheintensityof(200)peakdecreaseswhen
CoisdopedintotheZnOstructurewiththemolarityvalueofmore
than0.04M.
3.2. Opticalproperties
TheopticaltransmissionspectraofZnOandCodopedZnOthin
filmsamplesareshowninFig.3.TheeffectsofCodopingintothe
ZnOlatticeareclearlyobservedintheopticaltransmissionspectra.
TheincreaseofCoconcentrationintheZnOstructuredecreasesthe
opticaltransmittanceandimpartsdeepgreencolortothesamples
(Fig.4).Inaddition,increasingCoconcentrationalsomodifies
opti-caltransmittanceforthespecificregionduetoCo2+characteristic
transitions.Thesetransitionsalsosuppresstheinterferencefringes
inthisregionofCo:ZnOfilmsifthefilmthicknessissufficientto
createinterferencefringe.Inordertoeliminate theinfluenceof
differencesinsamplethickness,normalizedtransmittancetothe
valueat800nmweretakenintoaccount.Theabsorptionpeaks,
indicated with arrows in Fig. 3, centered at 571nm (2.18eV),
619nm(2.01eV)and662nm(1.88eV),arerelatedto
character-isticfeaturesofd–dtransitionofCo2+ions.Theyareassignedto
transition from 4A
2(F)state to 2E(G),4T1(P) and 2A1(G) states,
respectively[15].Thisisaclearevidencetoprovetheexistenceof
Fig.4. Experimentalopticaltransmissionspectra(solidline)of0.02MCocontent instartingsolutionforCo:ZnOthinfilm:Alsothetheoreticalopticaltransmission spectra(“o”symbol)areshownforcomparison.
Table2
Calculatedfilmthicknesst(nm),refractiveindexnfor532nmwavelengthandEg
(eV)opticalbandgapvaluesoftheCo:ZnO(CZO)thinfilmsvsthemolarityofCoin thestartingsolutions.
Samplename MolarityofCo(M) t(nm) n(532nm) Eg(eV)
ZnO 0.00 75±2 1.73 3.330 CZO1 0.01 105±2 2.23 3.072 CZO2 0.02 95±2 2.42 3.061 CZO3 0.03 160±2 2.73 2.985 CZO4 0.04 170±2 2.63 3.020 CZO5 0.05 180±2 2.59 3.030
CoatthetetrahedralsitesoftheZnOhexagonalwurtzitestructure
asCo2+.ComparingtheionicradiiofCo2+(0.058nm)whichisvery
closetoionicradii ofZn2+ (0.060nm)and theabsorptionpeaks
we canconcludethat theCoatomicallysubstitutesonZnsites.
Thisisalsoconfirmedinmanygroups,whichincludedavariety
ofmethodsandopticalabsorption[15,18,20–22].
Theopticaltransmissionspectrumcanbeusedinthe
determi-nationoftheopticalconstantsofthethinfilmdepositedontothe
transparentsubstrate.Whentheproductoftherefractiveindex
andfilmthicknessofthefilmhaveallowedtheformationof
inter-ference fringes,classicalmethods suchastheenvelopemethod
developed bySwanepoel [23]canbeused.Aswellasthe
num-beroftheinterferencefringesanddepthofthefringesarecrucial
toperformthismethod.However,PointwiseUnconstrained
Mini-mizationAlgorithm(PUMA)[24]andmanyotheriterativemethods
[25] canbeusedwhentheinterferencefringesobservedornot
observed inthetransmissionspectrum.Consideringthenormal
dispersionrelation,therefractiveindexdecreaseswiththe
increas-ingwavelength.ThisisnotvalidfortheCo:ZnOthinfilmsforthe
region where theloss of transmissiondue toCo2+
characteris-tictransitionswhichmodulatethetransmittancespectrumofour
samplesisobserved.Therefore,weusedPUMAtechniqueforthis
limitedregionwhichstartsfromtheinflexionwavelengthtothe
wavelengthcorrespondingfirstcharacteristictransitionwhichis
centeredat571nm(2.18eV).Inflexionwavelengthisdefinedfrom
secondderivativeofopticaltransmissioncurve[6,26].Thereisan
excellentagreementbetweentheexperimentalspectraand
theo-reticalspectraforallthesamplesandoneoftheexperimentaland
computedopticaltransmissionspectrafortheCo:ZnOthinfilmare
showninFig.4.Calculatedfilmthicknessandrefractiveindexfor
532nmaregiveninTable2.Thevalueofrefractiveindexis
Fig.5.OpticalabsorptionspectraoftheCo:ZnOandZnOthinfilmsas(˛h)2−h
behavior.
0.03M.Then,therefractiveindexstartstodecreaseagain.Having
suchaturningpointisinagreementwiththeotherobservations
suchasXRDandPLmeasurements.
Notonlythefilmthicknessandrefractiveindexbutalsooptical
absorptionspectrumcanbeobtainedfromtheopticaltransmission
spectrumusingsuitablemethods.Absorptionedgesforthe
semi-conductorsinformthethresholdofchargetransitionbetweenthe
highestfilledbandandthelowestemptyband.Theopticalbandgap
ofthefilmscanbecalculatedusingthefollowingequation[27]:
˛h
v
=A(hv
−Eg)n (1)whereAistheprobabilityparameterforthetransition,Egisthe
bandgapofthematerial,histheincidentphotonenergy,and
nisthetransitioncoefficient.Thevalueofnisknown:,2forthe
measurementofanindirectbandgapand1/2foradirectbandgap.
Fig.5a–fshowstheplotof(˛h)2vsthephotonenergy(h)of
theCo:ZnOthinfilms.Thedirectbandgapofthefilmswas
deter-minedbytakingtheintersectionoftheextrapolatedlinesfromthe
linearverticalandhorizontalregionsneartheband-edgeofthe
(˛h)2=0curve.AstheCoconcentrationisincreasedintheZnO
Fig.6.PLspectraofCo:ZnOandZnOthinfilmsatroomtemperature.
Table3
Photoluminescence(PL)analysisfromGaussianfittingprocesswithtwoGaussian peakscenteredat1and2forsamples,andcomputedopticalbandgap(Eg).
MolarityofCo(M) 1(nm) 2(nm) Eg(eV) 0.00 379.65 – 3.26 0.01 390.95 407.41 3.17 0.02 397.64 415.20 3.12 0.03 401.87 417.93 3.09 0.04 389.01 406.93 3.18 0.05 396.18 412.80 3.13
structure,redshiftisobservedintheabsorptionedgeduetothe
sp-dexchange interactionsbetweenthebandelectronsand the
localizedd-electronsoftheCo2+ionssubstitutingZn2+ions.
Cal-culatedvalueoftheopticalbandgapwithincreasingComolarity
from0to0.05MisgiveninTable1.
Fig. 6 shows the PL spectra of as-grown samples.
Photolu-minescencespectraofthesampleshavebeenrecordedatroom
temperature.ThePLemissionintheUVbandswasobserved.
Band-edgetransitionsaswellasdirect-bandtransitionsforZnOataround
380nm(3.26eV)areobserved.Gaussianfittingwasperformedon
thePLspectraofthesamplescontainingCo.Amongthetwopeaks
oneiscenteredaround400nm(1)assignedtothebandgap
tran-sitionandtheotherpeaksassignedtothenear-band-edge(NBE)
emission are centered at 407nm, 415nm,418nm, 407nm and
413nmforthesamplesCZ01,CZ02,CZ03,CZ04andCZ05,
respec-tively(Table3).Bandgapvaluesaredecreasinguptoathreshold
valueofCoconcentration.Thisbehavioris alsoobservedin the
refractiveindexvariation.Inaddition,theobservedPLintensity
begantodecreasewhenthecobaltwasintroducedintotheZnO
structure.
4. Conclusion
ThestructureandopticalpropertiesofCodopedZnOfilmswere
studiedwithrespecttocobaltconcentrationinthestartingsolution
inwhichthecobaltacetatetetrahydratewasusedasaCosource.
OurstudiesshowthatCodopingaffectsZnOlatticeimmediately.
WhentheComolarityisgreaterthanthe0.03MorCo
concentra-tionobtainedfromEDSanalysisisabout12%,theZnO(002)peak
intensitydecreasesandCoO(200)peakintensityincreaseswith
increasingCoconcentration.CosubstitutioninZnOlatticehasbeen
provedbytheopticaltransmittancemeasurement,whereasitis
notclearlyseenintheXRDdiffractogramfortheCZO1andCZO2
sample. Theopticaltransmittance decreaseswithincreasingCo
visiblelight.WhentheZn2+ionsarereplacedwithCo2+ionsinthe
ZnOlattice,thefilmsabsorbvisiblelight,andthecolorofthefilms
turntodeepgreen.ThecharacterofthebandgapoftheCZOfilmsis
directtypewithcobaltdoping.Whenthecobaltdopingisincreased,
Taucplotsarebecomingamoreroundedinshapeandtheinflexion
pointmovestothelongerwavelengths.Thebandgapobtainedfrom
Tauc’splotshiftingtowardtothelongerwavelengthswasverified
withroomtemperaturePLmeasurement.Thebandgapnarrowing
canbeattributedthattheconductionbandandthevalenceband
shifteddownwardandupward,respectively.Weconcludedthat
thered-shiftistypicallyattributedtothesp–dexchangebetween
theZnObandelectronsandlocalizedd-electronsassociatedwith
thedopedCo2+cations.
Acknowledgement
ThisstudywassupportedbyThe ScientificResearch Unitof
MehmetAkifErsoyUniversitywithprojectnumbers110-NAP-10,
0172-NAP-13,and0173-NAP-13.
References
[1]M.G.Tsoutsouva,C.N.Panagopoulos,D.Papadimitriou,I.Fasaki,M.Kompitsas, ZnOthinfilmspreparedbypulsedlaserdeposition,MaterSciEngB176(6) (2011)480–483.
[2]S.Kumar,Y.J.Kim,B.H.Koo,H.Choi,C.G.Lee,Ferromagnetismin chemically-synthesizedCo-dopedZnO,J.KoreanPhys.Soc.55(3)(2009)1060–1064. [3]M.Harati,D.Love,W.M.Lau,Z.Ding,Preparationofcrystallinezincoxidefilms
byone-stepelectrodepositioninReline,MaterLett89(2012)339–342. [4]S.Vempati,A.Shetty,P.Dawson,K.K.Nanda,S.B.Krupanidhi,Solution-based
synthesisofcobalt-dopedZnOthinfilms,ThinSolidFilms524(2012)137–143. [5]S.Karamat,R.S.Rawat,T.L.Tan,P.Lee,S.V.Springham,R.Anis-ur-Rehman, H.D.Chen,Sun,Excitingdilutemagneticsemiconductor:copper-dopedZnO,J. Supercond.Nov.Magn.26(2013)187–195.
[6]E.Gungor,T.Gungor,Effectofthesubstratemovementontheopticalproperties ofZnOthinfilmsdepositedbyultrasonicspraypyrolysis,Adv.Mater.Sci.Eng. (2012),articleID:594971(7pages).
[7]M.Tay,Y.Wu,G.C.Han,T.C.Chong,Y.K.Zheng,etal.,Ferromagnetismin inho-mogeneousZn1−xCoxOthinfilms,JApplPhys100(2006)063910.
[8]T.Dietl,H.Ohno,F.Matsukura,J.Cibert,D.Ferrand,Zenermodeldescriptionof ferromagnetisminzinc-blendemagneticsemiconductors,Science287(2000) 1019–1022.
[9]K.Sato,H.Katayama-Yoshida,Materialdesignfortransparentferromagnets withZnO-basedmagneticsemiconductors,Jpn.J.Appl.Phys.Pt.2(39)(2000) L555–L558.
[10]K.Sato,H.Katayama-Yoshida,Stabilizationofferromagneticstatesby elec-trondopinginFe-,Co-orNi-dopedZnO,Jpn.J.Appl.Phys.Pt.2(40)(2001) L334–L336.
[11]K.J.Kim,Y.R.Park,Spectroscopicellipsometrystudyofopticaltransitionsin Zn1−xCoxOalloys,ApplPhysLett81(2002)1420.
[12]M.Bouloudenine,N.Viart,S.Colis,A.Dinia,BulkZn1−xCoxOmagnetic semi-conductorspreparedbyhydrothermaltechnique,ChemPhysLett397(2004) 73–76.
[13]S.V.Bhat,F.L.Deepak,TuningthebandgapofZnObysubstitutionwithMn2+, Co2+andNi2+,SolidStateCommun135(2005)345–347.
[14]X.Liu,E.Shi,Z.Chen,H.Zhang,L.Song,H.Wang,S.Yao,Structural,optical andmagneticpropertiesofCo-dopedZnOfilms,JCrystGrowth296(2006) 135–140.
[15]M.Ivill,S.J.Pearton,S.Rawal,L.Leu,P.Sadik,R.Das,A.F.Hebard,M.Chisholm, J.D.Budai,D.P.Norton,Structureandmagnetismofcobalt-dopedZnOthin films,NewJ.Phys.10(2008)065002.
[16]H.-J.Lee,S.H.Choi,C.R.Cho,H.K.Kim,S.-Y.Jeong,Theformationofprecipitates intheZnCoOsystem,EurophysLett72(1)(2005)76–82.
[17]M.Bouloudenine,N.Viart,S.Colis,J.Kortus,A.Dinia,ApplPhysLett87(2005) 052501.
[18]C.B.Fitzgerald,M.Venkatesan,J.G.Lunney,L.S.Dorneles,J.M.D.Coey, Cobalt-dopedZnOatroomtemperaturedilutemagneticsemiconductor,ApplSurfSci 247(2005)493–496.
[19]C.Rath,S.Singh,P.Mallick,D.Pandey,N.P.Lalla,N.C.Mishra,Effectofcobalt substitutiononmicrostructureandmagneticpropertiesinZnOnanoparticles, IndianJ.Phys.83(4)(2009)415–421.
[20]A.C.Tuan,etal.,A.C.Tuan,J.D.Bryan,A.B.Pakhomov,V.Shutthanandan,S. The-vuthasan,D.E.McCready,D.Gaspar,M.H.Engelhard,J.W.RogersJr.,K.Krishnan, D.R. Gamelin,S.A. Chambers, Epitaxial growth and properties of cobalt-dopedZnOonalpha-Al2O3single-crystalsubstrates,PhysRevB70(2004) 054424.
[21]C.Song,F.Zeng,K.W.Geng,X.B.Wang,Y.X.Shen,F.Pan,Themagnetic prop-ertiesofCo-dopedZnOdilutedmagneticinsulatorfilmspreparedbydirect currentreactivemagnetronco-sputtering,JMagnMagnMater309(2007) 25–30.
[22]K.Samanta,P.Bhattacharya,R.S.Katiyar,OpticalpropertiesofZn1−xCoxOthin filmsgrownonAl2O3(0001)substrates,ApplPhysLett87(2005)101903. [23]R.Swanepoel,Determinationofthethicknessandopticalconstantsof
amor-phoussilicon,J.Phys.E.:Sci.Instrum.16(1983)1214–1222.
[24]E.G.Birgin,I.Chambouleyron,J.M.Martinez,Estimationofopticalconstants ofthinfilmsusingunconstrainedoptimization,J.Comput.Phys.151(1999) 862–888.
[25]T.Güngör,B.Saka,Calculationoftheopticalconstantsofathinlayerupona transparentsubstratefromthereflectionspectrumusingageneticalgorithm, ThinSolidFilms467(2004)319–325.
[26]R.Dolbec,M.A.ElKhakani,A.M.Serventi,M.T.Rudeau,R.G.Saint-Jacques, Microstructureandphysicalpropertiesofnanostructuredtinoxidethinfilms grownbymeansofpulsed laserdeposition,ThinSolidFilms419(2002) 230–236.
[27]J.Tauc,R.Grigorovici,A.Vancu,Opticalpropertiesandelectronicstructureof amorphousgermanium,Phys.Stat.Solidi15(1966)627.