Address for Correspondence: Dr. Farshad Ghazalian, Department of Physical Education, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran-Iran Phone: ++98 912 3011915 Fax: ++98 21 22576373 E-mail: phdghazalian@gmail.com
Accepted Date: 31.10.2014 Available Online Date: 31.12.2014
©Copyright 2015 by Turkish Society of Cardiology - Available online at www.anatoljcardiol.com DOI:10.5152/akd.2014.5863
A
BSTRACTObjective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of different whole-body vibration (WBV) training amplitudes on left ventricular stroke volume and ejection fraction in healthy young men.
Methods: A total of 24 healthy men (age 21.71±1.49 year, height 176.17±6.61 cm, weight 70.73±10.08 kg, BMI 22.36±3.57 kg/m2, and body surface
area 1.87±0.13 m2) were divided into two groups: high and low amplitude vibration (n=12). The vibration training consisted of 8 weeks of WBV 3
times a week with amplitudes of 2 or 4 mm and progressive frequencies from 20 Hz with increments of 5 Hz weekly. As outcome measures, left ventricular stroke volume and ejection fraction at baseline and after 8 weeks were evaluated. Mann-Whitney U test was used for the com-parison between groups; Wilcoxon signed-ranks tests were used to compare pretest and post-test results in each group. A p value less than 0.05 was considered significant.
Results: Whole-body vibration training with low amplitude (2 mm) caused an numerically increase in stroke volume (pre-test: 72.42±14.34; post-test: 78.42± 23.19 cm3; p=0.06) and ejection fraction (pre-test: 65.22±3.41; post-test: 67.00±4.18%; p=0.52). So; the increase was not significant.
In the high-amplitude (4 mm) group, post-test results were nearly unchanged compared to the pre-test results. No significant difference was evident between groups.
Conclusion: The intensity and volume of whole-body vibration training were not enough to affect systolic function. (Anatol J Cardiol 2015; 15: 976-80)
Key words: vibration, training, stroke volume, ejection fraction
Farshad Ghazalian, Laleh Hakemi
1, Lotfali Pourkazemi
2, Mohammadreza Akhoond
3Department of Physical Education, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University; Tehran-Iran
1Internal Medicine-Vice President- Sports Medicine Federation-Iran
2Sports Medicine Federation-Iran
3Department of Statistics, Shahid Chamran University; Ahwaz-Iran
Effects of amplitudes of whole-body vibration training on left
ventricular stroke volume and ejection fraction in healthy young men
Introduction
Whole-body vibration (WBV) training is a new exercise mode that is currently being investigated in the field of space travel, sports, and rehabilitation (1). Many studies have focused on the effects of endurance, aerobic, and resistive exercises on the cardiovascular system; however, research on the effects of WBV on the cardiovascular system is scarce. Most research in this area has focused only on the acute hemody-namic changes that occur following a bout of WBV exercise. Increases in blood flow were demonstrated by Yamada et al. (2), who found that blood volume in the leg muscle increased acutely after WBV with a dynamic squat exercise. Maikala et al. (3) suggested that energy expenditures in whole-body vibration training are similar to ‘light’ work of 0.3 metabolic
energy equivalents. Da Silva et al. (4), however, found that vibration training provides cardiovascular stimuli similar to those experienced during moderate walking at 4 km/h. Cochrane et al. (5) showed that squat exercises on a vibration plate (3 s up, 3 s down) lead to a similar metabolic rate as cycling at 70 Watts. Hazell et al. (6) found that a WBV session increased 24-h oxygen consumption by 10% compared to non-WBV exercise.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of different amplitudes of whole-body vibration training with progressive fre-quencies on left ventricular stroke volume and ejection fraction.
Methods
Subject selection and measurement
In this blinded clinical trial, a total of 35 healthy young men without any history of thyroid dysfunction, anemia, smoking, diabetes mellitus, and cardiac disease served as subjects. They had not done any exercises regularly for at least 3 months before the start of the training. Men with cardiovascu-lar problems were excluded (5 persons with mitral valve pro-lapse). All subjects were informed about the procedures, risks, and benefits in advance. Six subjects were excluded, because they did not participate in post-test measurements; 24 healthy men (age 21.71±1.49 year, height 176.17±6.61 cm, weight
70.73±10.08 kg, BMI 22.36±3.57 kg/m2, body surface area
1.87±0.13 m2) completed the study. Body surface area was
calculated by DuBois formula [BSA (m2)=0.007184 x height (cm)
0.725 x weight (kg) 0.425].
All subjects were divided into two groups: high-amplitude vibration (n=12) and low-amplitude vibration (n=12); their demo-graphic data were not significantly different (p>0.05). The vibra-tion training consisted of 8 weeks of whole-body vibravibra-tion 3 times a week with amplitudes of 2 or 4 mm and progressive fre-quencies from 20 Hz, with increments of 5 Hz weekly. As out-come measures, left ventricular stroke volume and ejection fraction at baseline and after 8 weeks were considered.
Echocardiographic examination
A My Lab echocardiograph (Esaote Europe B.V., Maastricht, The Netherlands) equipped with a 2.5 MHz probe was used. Subjects were examined, and conventional two-dimensional (2-D)-guided M-mode and B-mode measurements were recorded. All echocardiographic exams were performed by
just one experienced board-certified cardiologist before and after the intervention (WBV training). Neither the subjects nor the cardiologist knew the grouping, so the study is considered blinded.
From the long-axis view, and following the AHA (American Heart Association) echocardiography guidelines (8), the standard left ventricle (LV) 2-D parameters were obtained at rest. The basal 2-D systolic-diastolic parameters, interventricular septum (IVS) and posterior wall (PW) thicknesses, left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDv), left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESv), ejection fraction by Simpson’s rule (EF), left ventricular stroke volume (LVSV), and LV mass (LV mass) were measured.
Images were obtained in the left lateral decubitus position, after a 15-minute rest. High-quality images were acquired, with excellent visualization of the endocardial and epicardial borders.
Whole-body vibration training
The subjects were familiarized with the testing procedures. Subjects participated in a standardized dynamic 5-10-minute warm-up. Vibration training was performed on a vibration plat-form (Fit Vib, Germany). During the 8-week experimental period, all subjects continued their conventional living schedule, in addi-tion to the 3-times-weekly WBV training with amplitudes of 4 or 2 mm and progressively increasing frequencies from 20 to 55 Hz with increments of 5 Hz weekly. Each training session consisted of two sets of three repetitions of vibration training in three posi-tions (squat, lunges, and deep squat). The total weekly duration
of vibration training was 40.5 minutes. The 1st, 2nd, and 3rd
ses-sions of each week consisted of 9, 13.5, and 18 minutes of vibra-tion training, respectively. Table 1 describes the training sched-ule in detail.
Statistical analysis
SPSS for Windows, version 19 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for the data analysis. Mean and standard deviations were used for the description of variables. Due to the lack of
Frequency in Duration of Duration of Total duration of Session Position of the first week*, Amplitudes**, each repetition, rest between training in the (every week) training Set Repetition Hertz millimeters seconds sets, seconds session, minutes
1st session of the week Squat 2 3 20 4 or 2 30 30 9
Lunges 2 3 Deep Squat 2 3
2nd session of the week Squat 2 3 20 4 or 2 45 30 13.5
Lunges 2 3 Deep Squat 2 3
3rd session of the week Squat 2 3 20 4 or 2 60 30 18
Lunges 2 3 Deep Squat 2 3
*The frequency at the beginning of the program was 20 Hz, which was progressively increased (5 Hz each week) to the final frequency of 55Hz. **4 mm for the high-amplitude and 2 mm for the low-amplitude groups
normality, in order to make a comparison between groups, we used Mann-Whitney U test. In order to compare pretest and post-test results, we used Wilcoxon signed-ranks test. A p value less than 0.05 was considered significant.
Ethical issues
The study protocol was evaluated and accepted by Ethical Committee of the Sports Medicine Federation of Iran, and it complies with the Helsinki Declaration. All participants received adequate information about the study protocol and the possible good and ill effects of training. They entered the study deliber-ately and were free to quit the protocol upon their request.
Results
In this study showed that the intensity and volume of whole-body vibration training were not enough to affect systolic func-tion.
In the subjects, whole-body vibration training with low amplitude (2 mm) caused an increase in stroke volume (pretest:
72.42±14.34; post-test:78.42±23.19 cm3; p=0.06) and ejection
frac-tion (pretest: 65.22±3.41; post-test:67.00±4.18%; p=0.52); but the increase was not significant. Whole-body vibration training with progressive frequencies and high amplitude (4 mm) did not change left ventricular stroke volume and ejection fraction sig-nificantly. Comparing the effects of training between the two groups, no significant difference was evident. Table 2 shows the data of the pre- and post-intervention measurements.
Discussion
In this study showed that the intensity and volume of whole-body vibration training were not enough to affect systolic func-tion. In the high-amplitude (4 mm) group, post-test results were nearly unchanged compared to pretest results. No significant difference was evident between groups.
Stroke volume (SV) is the volume of blood pumped from the left ventricle with each heartbeat. It is calculated by the differ-ence between end-diastolic and end-systolic volume of the left
ventricle. EF represents the volumetric fraction of blood pumped out of the ventricle with each heartbeat, and EF indicates the contractile status of the heart (9).
Studies demonstrating WBV have utilized training time peri-ods ranging from 10 days to 6 months, frequencies between 12 and 60 Hz, and amplitudes ranging from 1.7 to 10 mm (10, 11). A wide variety of amplitudes, frequencies, and durations have been utilized, and a clear pattern is not evident. The controlled use of vibration to cause positive physical and biological responses requires the use of proper doses of vibration, con-sisting of three aspects: volume, intensity, and strength of the vibration load. The intensity of the vibration load refers to the mechanical characteristics of the frequency and amplitude of the vibration stimulus. The volume of the vibration load refers to the volume of time under the vibration stimulus. The term ‘strength of the vibration load’ describes the observational char-acteristics of the muscle impacted by the vibration load. WBV requires fewer physical skills and shorter training sessions than aerobic exercise (AE) and resistance exercise (RE). Therefore, the expected findings could be of considerable importance for routine sports training and various therapeutic procedures.
Factors that potentially affect cardiac filling during exercise include total blood or plasma volume, pericardial and myocar-dial compliance, active diastolic relaxation, and arteriolar and veno-motor tone. Several studies have evaluated the effect of endurance exercise training on LV systolic functions. The data showed that there were no significant differences between sedentary controls and athletes with regard to LVEF (12). Baggish et al. (13) demonstrated in a longitudinal study that a 90-day period of endurance exercise training increased the LV strain without changing the LVEF. The study by Mantziari et al. (14) also demonstrated similar results. Systolic strain is defined as the change of myocardial fiber length during the cardiac cycle, and it is affected by after-load, pre-load, and intrinsic contractility (15). Stroke volume increased progressively with increasing levels of exercise in most subjects, but the relation
between stroke volume and VO2 (oxygen consumption) was not
linear. Ekblom et al. (16) reported a progressive increase in SV
with increasing exercise intensity (between 40% and 80% VO2
max) in 8 elite (VO2 max=74.6 mL/kg/min) and 5 regional level (VO2
max=66.0 mL/kg/min) endurance athletes. Nine of these athletes (69%) achieved their highest SV during maximal exercise. Jensen-Urstad et al. (17) reported that training-induced increas-es in myocardial contractility and possibly a decreased after-load were the main contributing factors to the increase in stroke volume during incremental exercise in elite male runners. Similarly, Vanfraechem et al. (18) reported that left ventricular ejection times decreased at each workload in male soccer play-ers. The authors hypothesized that the continued increase in stroke volume, despite the decrease in ventricular ejection time, may be due to an increase in ejection fraction during exercise of increasing intensity (18). Lentini et al. (19) examined the effects of repetitive leg-press exercise at 95% of 1 repetition maximum (1RM) performed with brief Valsalva maneuvers (VMs) on LV
Low- High- amplitude amplitude
Variable group group P
Stroke volume, Pretest 72.42±14.34 75.43±15.71 0.47 cubic centimeters Post-test 78.42±23.19 75.85±14.66 0.72
P value 0.06 1.00
Ejection fraction, Pretest 65.22±3.41 65.58±3.44 0.97 percent Post-test 67.00±4.18 65.75±3.33 0.49
P value 0.52 0.84
Values are mean±SD; *P<0.05 significant change; comparison between pre-exercise and post-exercise
volumes and systolic function in younger healthy males. The major finding was that LV end-diastolic and end-systolic vol-umes decreased during exercise compared with resting values. Consequently, preload reserve and stroke volume declined. However, since leg-press exercise mediated greater LV contrac-tility and heart rate, cardiac output and ejection fraction increased (19). Some studies have shown improvements in EF following exercise; however, others did not show this effect (20). Ejection fraction is supposed to be increased during exercise but not at rest. A single bout of WBV exercise was found to increase leg muscle blood flow (21, 22) and reduce leg arterial stiffness (23). Recent studies reported that repeated bouts of WBV (24, 25) up-regulate the nitric oxide dilator system and improve endothelial function. However, while positive results in vascular function were reported after acute intermittent vibration protocols (21, 22), others have not (26), and to date, no studies have explored the chronic effects of WBV exercise training on cardiovascular function. Evidence of reduced arterial stiffness and wave reflection in young overweight or obese non-diabetic women following WBV exercise training (22) suggests that WBV may be an effective training mode for improving leg artery blood flow. Vibration training uses an oscillating platform that delivers sinusoidal vibrations (21) that evoke reflexive muscle contrac-tions (27) while the person performs steadily controlled dynamic and static exercises. The vibration mechanically stimulates sen-sory receptors, leading to the activation of alpha-motor neurons and, consequently, muscle contractions through the tonic vibra-tion reflex (28). These contracvibra-tions explain the increased levels of electromyography in working muscle during WBV exercise (29) and the increased energy output that is shown to result from the addition of vibration to squat exercises (4).
Variables of vibration training, like other training protocols, consist of frequency (Hz), amplitude (mm), and duration (s). As the movement of the platform is sinusoidal, the acceleration
transmitted to the body is calculated as a=A(2πf)2, where “A” is
the amplitude of the oscillations and “f” is the frequency (30). Small changes in amplitude and frequency determine relatively large changes in the acceleration and magnitude of the vibration being transmitted to the body. It seems that in this study, the intensity and volume of whole-body vibration training were not enough to affect systolic function.
Study limitations
A major limitation of this study was the small sample size (power 0.05-0.24). Another limitation may have been that the exercise training volume and duration were not enough to elicit adaptations.
Conclusion
WBV is a fast and effective alternative to resistance training. The low-impact nature of this exercise makes WBV an attractive exercise mode that can be a good training option for persons
wishing to minimize the amount of repetitive joint load. Eight weeks of whole-body vibration did not affect systolic function significantly.
Conflict of interest: None declared. Peer-review: Externally peer-reviewed.
Authorship contributions: Concept - F.G.; Design - F.G.; Supervision - F.G., L.H.; Resource - L.P.; Materials - L.H.; Data collection &/or pro-cessing - F.G.; Analysis &/or interpretation - M.A.; Literature search - F.G.; Writing - F.G., L.H.; Critical review - L.P.
References
1. Otsuki T, Takanami Y, Aoi W, Kawai Y, Ichikawa H, Yoshikawa T. Arterial stiffness acutely decreases after whole-body vibration in humans. Acta Physiol 2008; 194: 189-94. [CrossRef]
2. Yamada E, Kusaka T, Miyamoto K, Tanaka S, Morita S, Tanaka S, et al. Vastus lateralis oxygenation and blood volume measured by near-infrared spectroscopy during whole body vibration. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging 2005; 25: 203-8. [CrossRef]
3. Maikala RV, King S, Bhambhani YN. Acute physiological responses in healthy men during whole body vibration. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2006; 79: 103-14. [CrossRef]
4. Da Silva ME, Fernandez JM, Castillo E, Nunez VM, Vaamonde DM, Poblador MS, et al. Influence of vibration training on energy expen-diture in active men. J Strength Cond Res 2007; 21: 470-5. [CrossRef] 5. Cochrane DJ, Sartor F, Winwood K, Stannard SR, Narici MV,
Rittweger J. A comparison of physiologic effects of acute whole body-vibration exercise on young and older people. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008; 89: 815-21. [CrossRef]
6. Hazell TJ, Lemon PW. Synchronous whole-body vibration increas-es VO2 during and following acute exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol 2012; 112: 413-20. [CrossRef]
7. Reisner SA, Lysyansky P, Agmon Y, Mutlak D, Lessick J, Friedman Z. Global longitudinal strain: a novel index of left ventricular systolic function. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2004; 17: 630-3. [CrossRef] 8. Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Chatterjee K, de Leon AC Jr, Faxon DP,
Freed MD, et al. ACC/AHA 2006 Guidelines for the management of patient with valvular heart disease. A report of American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Pratice Guidelines, (writing Committee to Revise the 1998 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease) devel-oped in collaboration with the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 48: 1-148. [CrossRef]
9. Goodman JM, Liu PP, Green HJ. Left ventricular adaptations following short-term endurance training. J Appl Physiol 2005; 98: 454-60. [CrossRef] 10. Rehn B, Lidström J, Skoglund J, Lindström B. Effects on leg muscu-lar performance from whole-body vibration exercise: a systematic review. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2007; 17: 2-11.
11. Cardinale M, Wakeling J.Whole body vibration exercise: are vibra-tion good for you? Br J Sports Med 2005; 39: 585-9. [CrossRef] 12. Pluim BM, Zwinderman AH, van der Laarse A, van der Wall EE. The
13. Baggish AL, Yared K, Wang F, Weiner RB, Hutter AM Jr, Picard MH, et al. The impact of endurance exercise training on left ventricular systolic mechanics. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2008; 295: H1109-16. [CrossRef]
14. Mantziari A, Vassilikos VP, Giannakoulas G, Karamitsos TD, Dakos G, Girasis C, et al. Left ventricular function in elite rowers in rela-tion to training-induced structural myocardial adaptarela-tion. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2010; 20: 428-33. [CrossRef]
15. Becker M, Kramann R, Dohmen G, Luckhoff A, Autschbach R, Kelm M, et al. Impact of left ventricular loading conditions on myocar-dial deformation parameters: analysis of early and late changes of myocardial deformation parameters after aortic valve replace-ment. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2007; 20: 681-9. [CrossRef]
16. Ekblom B, Hermansen L. Cardiac output in athletes. J Appl Physiol 1968; 25: 619-25.
17. Jensen-Urstad M, Bouvier F, Nejat M, Saltin B, Brodin LA. Left ventricular function in endurance runners during exercise. Acta Physiol Scand 1998; 164: 167-72. [CrossRef]
18. Vanfraechem JH. Stroke volume and systolic time interval adjust-ments during bicycle exercise. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol 1979; 46: 588-92.
19. Lentini AC, McKelvie RS, McCartney N, Tomlinson CW, MacDougall JD. Left ventricular response in healthy young men during heavy-intensity weight-lifting exercise. J Appl Physiol 1993; 75: 2703-10. 20. Bjørnstad H, Storstein L, Meen HD, Hals O. Electrocardiographic
findings of repolarization in athletic students and control sub-jects. Cardiology 1994; 84: 51-60. [CrossRef]
21. Kerschan-Schindl K, Grampp S, Henk C, Resch H, Preisinger E, Fialka-Moser V, et al. Whole-body vibration exercise leads to altera-tions in muscle blood volume. Clin Physiol 2001; 21: 377-82. [CrossRef]
22. Lythgo N, Eser P, de Groot P, Galea M .Whole-body vibration dos-age alters leg blood flow. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging 2009; 29: 53-9. [CrossRef]
23. Figueroa A, Gil R, Wong A, Hooshmand S, Park SY, Vicil F, Sanchez-Gonzalez MA. Whole-body vibration training reduces arterial stiffness, blood pressure and sympatho vagal balance in young overweight/obese women. Hypertens Res 2012; 35: 667-72. [CrossRef]
24. Maloney-Hinds C, Petrofsky JS, Zimmerman G, Hessinger DA. The role of nitric oxide in skin blood flow increases due to vibration in healthy adults and adults with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther 2009; 11: 39-43. [CrossRef]
25. Devereux GR, Wiles JD, Swaine IL. Reductions in resting blood pressure after 4 weeks of isometric exercise training. Eur JAppl Physiol 2010; 109: 601-6. [CrossRef]
26. Hazell TJ, Thomas GW, Deguire JR, Lemon PW. Vertical whole-body vibration does not increase cardiovascular stress tostatic semi-squat exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol 2008; 104: 903-8. [CrossRef] 27. Bazrgari BA, Shirazi-Adl, Kasra M. Seated whole body vibrations
with high magnitude accelerations-relative roles of inertia and muscle forces. J Biomech 2008; 41: L2639-46. [CrossRef]
28. Delecluse C, Roelants M, Verschueren S. Strength increase after whole-body vibration compared with resistance training. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003; 35: 1033-41. [CrossRef]
29. Cardinale M, Bosco C. The use of vibration as an exercise inter-vention. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 2003; 31: 3-7. [CrossRef]
