Surfactant
and
metal
ion
effects
on
the
mechanical
properties
of
alginate
hydrogels
Hakan
Kaygusuz
a,b,
Güls¸
en
Akın
Evingür
c,
Önder
Pekcan
d,
Regine
von
Klitzing
b,
F.
Bedia
Erim
a,∗aIstanbulTechnicalUniversity,FacultyofScienceandLetters,Maslak34469Istanbul,Turkey
bStranski-LaboratoriumfürPhysikalischeundTheoretischeChemie,InstitutfürChemie,TechnischeUniversitätBerlin,Strassedes17.Juni124,10623
Berlin,Germany
cPiriReisUniversity,FacultyofScienceandLetters,Tuzla34940Istanbul,Turkey dKadirHasUniversity,FacultyofScienceandLetters,Cibali,34083Istanbul,Turkey
a
r
t
i
c
l
e
i
n
f
o
Articlehistory: Received25March2016
Receivedinrevisedform4June2016 Accepted1July2016
Availableonline2July2016 Keywords:
Alginate Surfactant
Mechanicalproperties
a
b
s
t
r
a
c
t
Thispaperaddressesthecontrolledvariationofthemechanicalpropertiesofalginategelbeadsby
chang-ingthealginateconcentrationorbyaddingdifferentsurfactantsorcross-linkingcations.Alginatebeads
containingnonionicBrij35oranionicsodiumdodecylsulfate(SDS)surfactantswerepreparedwithtwo
differenttypesofcations(Ca2+,Ba2+)ascrosslinkers.Compressionmeasurementswereperformedto
investigatetheeffectofthesurfactantandcationtypesandtheirconcentrationsontheYoung’smodulus
ofalginatebeads.TheYoung’smoduluswasdeterminedbyusingHertztheory.Foralltypesofalginate
gelbeadstheYoung’smodulusshowedanincreasingvalueforincreasingalginatecontents.Addition
oftheanionicsurfactantSDSincreasestheYoung’smodulusofthealginatebeadswhiletheadditionof
non-ionicsurfactantBrij35leadstoadecreaseinYoung’smodulus.Thisoppositebehaviorisrelatedto
thecontraryeffectofbothsurfactantsonthechargeofthealginatebeads.WhenBa2+ionswereusedas
crosslinkercation,theYoung’smodulusofthebeadswiththesurfactantSDSwasfoundtobe
approxi-matelytwotimeshigherthanthemodulusofbeadswiththesurfactantBrij35.Anionspecificeffectwas
foundforthecrosslinkingabilityofdivalentcations.
©2016ElsevierB.V.Allrightsreserved.
1. Introduction
Alginateisamaterialofinterestduetoitsuniqueanduseful properties.Beingextractedfrommarinebrownalgae,alginatesare non-toxicand ediblepolysaccharides.Thispolymerisa copoly-mer of 1–4 linked -d-mannuronate (M) and ␣-l-guluronate (G)homopolymericblocks.Thispolyelectrolyteformscrosslinked hydrogelswithdivalentcations,andthishydrogelstructureisused inmanyapplications.Applicationsofcrosslinkedalginateshavea widerange,includingcontrolledrelease,drugdelivery formula-tionsandwasteremovalagents[1–5].
Addition of various dopants to alginate formulations may increasethechemicalandmechanicalstabilityofthegels.Oneof thecandidatesfordopantsissurfactants.Previously,theeffectof cationicsurfactantcetyltrimethylammoniumbromide(CTAB)on viscosityand theeffectof SDSonaggregationof alginate
solu-∗ Correspondingauthor.
E-mailaddress:erim@itu.edu.tr(F.B.Erim).
tionwerestudiedbyYangetal.[6,7].Rheologicalandturbidity measurementswerecarriedoutinaqueousmixturesof hydropho-bically modified alginates with cationic, anionic and nonionic surfactantswerealsoreportedbefore[8].
TheeffectofdifferentcrosslinkingcationsonYoung’s modu-lusvaluesofalginatebeads[9],theeffectofcompressionspeed [10],theeffectsofM/Gratioofalginateandofthecrosslinking cationtype[11]onmechanicalbehaviorhavebeenreportedbefore. Recentlytheeffectsofthecrosslinkingionandpolyaminoacid coat-ingonthemechanicalpropertiesofalginatebeadswerereported [12].Besidesbeads,theeffectofthecrosslinkingiononthe mechan-icalpropertiesofdisc-shapedalginatesarealsoreported,suchas therecentstudybyKaklamanietal.[13].
Theimportanceofthealginatematerialsinbiomedical appli-cations such as drug release studies and scaffolds for tissue engineering requires mechanical strength of thesegels. Surfac-tantsplayanimportantrolefortheuptakeandreleaseofdrugs. Accordingtoourknowledge,sofartheeffectofsurfactantonthe mechanicalpropertiesofalginategelbeadshasn’tbeenstudied. Thispaperreportsforthefirsttime,theeffectofsurfactant incor-http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.07.004
Fig.1.Schematicrepresentationoftheunaxialcompressionmeasurement.
poration intoalginate gelsonthe Young’s modulusof alginate beads.Twodifferenttypesofsurfactants (nonionic:Brij35 and anionic:sodiumdodecylsulfate)wereused.Surfactantadded algi-nateswerecrosslinkedbycalciumorbariumions.Theeffectof crosslinkingionsonYoung’smoduluswasalsostudied.
2. Materialsandmethods
Alginicacidsodium salt (viscosity of 2% solution∼250 cps) wasfromSigma-Aldrich.Thisalginateisextractedfrom Macrocys-tispyriferaandhasaM/Gratioaround1.6[14].Calciumchloride dihydratewaspurchasedfromJ.T.Baker.Brij®35,sodiumdodecyl sulfate(SDS)andbariumchloridedihydratewereobtainedfrom Merck.Allreagentswereusedwithoutfurtherpurification.The criticalmicelleconcentration(cmc)ofBrij®35isabout0.09mmol/L andabout8mmol/LforSDS.Inthepresentstudybothsurfactants wereusedwellabovetheirrespectivecriticalmicelle concentra-tions(cmc).
Accuratelyweighedalginatewasdissolvedindeionizedwater andnecessarilyamountsofsurfactantswereaddedintothealginate solutions.Thesolutionswerestirredcarefullyinordertoprevent bubbleformation.ThepHofthe1%alginatesolutionwasaround 6.7.AdditionofSDSintoalginatedidnotchangethepH signifi-cantly.Ontheotherhand,incorporationofBrij35 intoalginate solutions decreased thepH slightly toaround 6.45. After com-pletedissolution,themixtureofalginateandsurfactantwereadded dropwisetothegellingsolution(e.g.CaCl2orBaCl2)usingasyringe
of 0.8cm inner diameter.The concentrationof thecrosslinking solutionswasselectedas3%ofCaCl2orBaCl2(w/v)inthe
exper-imentsdealing withthe effect of surfactants. For the effect of crosslinkerionexperiments,theconcentrationswere2,3and5%of CaCl2orBaCl2(w/v).Formedbeadsweretransferredintostorage
vesselsandkeptinthegellingmediafor12hatroomtemperature inordertocompletegelation.
CompressionmeasurementswerecarriedoutusinganInstron 3345testingmachineattachedwitha10Nforcetransducer.The diameterofeachbeadwasmeasuredusingadigitalcaliperandall ofthemeasurementswereconductedatleastintriplicate.Asingle beadwasplacedontoaplatform,asshowninFig.1.Aprobewith aflatendwasusedtocompressthebead.Compression measure-mentswereperformedataspeedof0.5mm/minandupto40% deformationratioat25◦C.
Inordertoclarifythestatisticalsignificanceoftheresults,single factoranalysisofvariance(ANOVA)testswereconductedforeach dataset.Thelevelofstatisticalsignificancewasassumedas0.05 andstatisticalcalculationswasdoneusingRstatisticalsoftwarev. 3.02[15].
3. Results
Theeffect ofcrosslinkercation, alginateand surfactant con-centrationson beadsize is shown onTable 1. Bariumalginate
Fig.2. TheForceF(N)and(H/2)3/2curvesof4%(w/v)alginatebeadscrosslinked
with3%(w/v)BaCl2containing(a)0,5,111and333timescmcBrij35and(b),0,
3.1,12.5,25and50timescmcSDS.Thearrowsindicatethedirectionofincreasing surfactantconcentration.
beadshavebiggerdiameterthancalciumalginatebeads.Thesizes increasedwithincreasingalginateconcentrations forall formu-lations.Incorporatingbothtypesofsurfactantsintoformulations decreasesthesizesofthebeadsinitially,thenthesizesincrease withincreasingsurfactantconcentrations.For333cmcofBrij35 (i.e.themolarconcentrationofBrij35has333timesofcmcofBrij 35)and50cmcofSDS,thesizesbecamealmostequalto formula-tionswithoutanysurfactantforeachcrosslinkerconcentration.
Theforce(F)versusdisplacement(H)datawasgeneratedfrom thecompressionmeasurements.HertzTheory[16] wasusedto determinetheYoung’smodulus,asshownbelow:
F=4R30.5 E 1−
v
2 H 2 3/2 (1) where Ris theradiusofa bead,EistheYoung’smodulus,His thedisplacement,andisthePoisson’sratio.First,theforce(F) wasplottedagainstthedisplacement(H)3/2.ThePoissonratiowastakenas0.5for0.5mm/mincompressionspeedapplied.Thisvalue iscompatiblewithliteraturevalues[10,17].Intheliterature,for the compression speed range between 0.075mm/min [17] and 60mm/min,[10]thePoissonratiowasselectedas0.5.TheYoung’s moduluswasthendeterminedfromtheslopeoflinearregionusing theleastsquareregressionoftheplotofFversus(H/2)3/2.
Twoexamplesofforceversus(H)3/2curvesfor4%(w/v)
algi-natebeadscrosslinkedwith3%(w/v)BaCl2areshowninFig.2(a)
and(b).Fig.2(a)correspondstothe4%(w/v)alginatebeads con-taining0,55,111and333timescmcofBrij35.Fig.2(b)showsthe curvesof4%(w/v)alginatebeadscontaining0,3.1,12.5,25and 50timescmcofSDS.FromcomparingFig.2(a)withFig.2(b),the largerconcentrationsofSDSsurfactantrequiredlargerforce val-uestoproduceagivendegreeofdeformation.Ontheotherhand, thenonionicsurfactantBrij35showstheoppositeeffect.Thesame trendwasobservedforcalciumalginatebeads,withsmallerslope values.Foreachformulation,theYoung’smodulusofatleastthree differentbeadswerecalculatedfromthelinearregionoftheforce versus(H)3/2curves.
StatisticalsignificanceofYoung’smodulusvaluesamong chang-ingsurfactantconcentrationsateachalginateconcentrationwas investigated usingonewayANOVAtests atp=0.05. Except the 1%and2%(w/v)alginatebeadscrosslinkedwithbarium,allseries resultedinp<0.05.Thus,incorporationofBrij35showsnoeffect
SDS
3.1cmc 2.6±0.3 2.7±0.1 3.1±0.1 3.2±0.6 3.1±0.2 3.3±0.1 3.2±0.2
12.5cmc 3.0±0.2 3.2±0.1 3.1±0.1 3.2±0.1 3.1±0.2 3.4±0.1 3.8±0.2
25cmc 3.1±0.5 3.4±0.1 3.2±0.1 3.8±0.3 3.3±0.1 3.7±0.2 3.6±0.1
50cmc 3.2±0.2 3.5±0.2 3.2±0.1 4.0±0.2 3.4±0.3 3.8±0.1 4.1±0.5
Fig.3.Effectof(a)Brij35and(b)SDSconcentrationsontheYoung’smodulusof thealginatebeadswithvariousalginateconcentrations.Crosslinkingsolution:3% (w/v)CaCl2.Errorbarsindicatestandarderrorsofthemean.
onbariumalginatebeadsatanalginateconcentrationupto2%and
otherresultsarestatisticallysignificant.
Fig.3(a)and(b) showtheeffect ofsurfactanttype and sur-factantconcentrationontheYoung’smodulusofthebeadswith varyingconcentrationsofalginatesolutionsbycrosslinkingwith 3%CaCl2ions.ThemostpronouncedeffectontheYoung’smodulus
isgivenbythealginateconcentration.Byincreasingthealginate concentrationfrom1to4%(w/v)theYoung’smodulusincrease byfactor5–6fromabout50kPatoalmost300kPa.Asseenfrom Fig.3(a),theYoung’smodulusofalginatebeadsdecreaseswithBrij 35concentration.Thisdecreaseismoreapparentforhigher algi-nateconcentrations.Ontheotherhand,thevalueoftheYoung’s modulusofalginatebeadsincreaseswithSDSconcentrationsfor beadscontainingdifferentalginateconcentrations.Itisimportant tonotethattheYoung’smodulusforcalciumcrosslinkedpure algi-natebeadsareintherangeof60–300kPa,whicharecomparable withtheresultsbyKaklamanietal.reportedfor2.5–5%alginateand 1–5MCa2+althoughtheymanufactureddisc-shapedpurealginate
hydrogels[13].
TheeffectofBrij35andSDSconcentrationsontheYoung’s mod-ulusofalginatebeadscrosslinkedwith3%(w/v)BaCl2ionsisshown
inFig.4.WhiletheYoung’smoduliofthebeadsslightlydecrease withBrij35concentration,aconsiderableincreaseintheYoung modulusisobservedwithincreasingSDSconcentration.From com-paringFig.3(b)andFig.4(b),theSDSeffectontheelasticmodules ofalginatebeadsisstrongerforBa-Alginatebeadscomparedto Ca-Alginatebeads.TheYoung’smodulusofbariumalginatebeads
Fig.4.Effectof(a)Brij35and(b)SDSconcentrationsontheYoung’smodulusof thealginatebeadswithvariousalginateconcentrations.Crosslinkingion:3%(w/v) BaCl2.Errorbarsindicatestandarderrorsofthemean.
containing50cmcSDSwasapproximatelytwotimeshigherwhen comparedwiththemodulusofpurebeads.Itshouldbenotedthat therewasnosphericalbariumbeadformationfortheformulations containingSDSand1%(w/v)BaCl2.Theformedgelswereflatand
thereforearenotincludedinthemeasurements.
Inordertounderstandtheeffectofcationconcentrationonthe beadscontainingtheanionicsurfactantSDS,thealginateandSDS concentrationswerekeptconstant(2%and50cmc,respectively), whereastheconcentrationsofbothCaCl2 andBaCl2werevaried
from1to5%(w/v).ThecationeffectonYoung’smodulusofthe beadsisgiveninFig.5.AsseenfromFig.5,theYoung’smodulusof alginatebeadscrosslinkedwithCa2+ionsdecreasesslightlywith
increasingcalciumionconcentration,whereastheYoung modu-lusofbariumalginatebeadsincreasesdramaticallywithincreasing bariumionconcentration.BariumalginategelshavelargerYoung’s modulusthancalciumalginateonesandthisorderisthesamefor formulationscontainingSDS.
4. Discussion
4.1. Effectofalginateconcentration
ThestrongesteffectontheYoung’smodulusiscausedbythe changeinalginateconcentration.Theincreaseinalginatefrom1to 4%leadstoanincreaseinYoung’smodulusbyafactorofabout5–6. Theincreaseinalginateleadstoadensificationofthebeads’
mate-Fig.5.EffectofcationcrosslinkerconcentrationontheYoung’smodulusof2%(w/v) alginatebeadscontaining50cmcSDS.Errorbarsindicatestandarderrorsofthe mean.
rial.Onehastokeepinmindthatthealginatechainsthemselves formaggregatesviahydrogenbonding.
4.2. Effectofsurfactant
Theconstituentsof thealginatecopolymer,mannuronicacid and guluronicacid,are acidicmonomers havingpKa values 3.2
and 3.6, respectively [18]. However, there is not anyliterature reportaboutthepKavalueofthecopolymer.Accordingtoour
pre-viouselectrophoreticstudywithalginatepolymer,alginatedoes notgain a noticeable electrophoreticmobilitybetweenpH=3.5 and 8.5. However, when SDS added to the medium above its cmc,alginategainsanelectrophoreticmobilitylikea negatively chargedmolecule.Thisbehaviorshowedusaninteractionbetween alginate biopolymer and SDS micelles [19]. Since the interac-tionisnotelectrostatic,itcanbetheoreticallyexpectedthatthe SDS carbon chain and the alginatecopolymer chain show this hydrophobic–hydrophobicinteraction.Inthepresentstudy,since theusedSDSconcentrationiswellabovethecmc,itcanbeassumed that half micelles are formed along the alginate chains which increasethenegativechargedensityofthealginate/SDSassociate. Thisadditionalchargeoffersmoreadsorptionsiteforthedivalent cationsandthereforeahigheramountofcross-linkersthaninthe SDS-freegelbead.Thisincreasingamountofcross-linkerpoints increasesthestiffnessandtheYoung’smodulus.SincetheSDS con-centrationsarewellabovethecmc,asalteffectofAlginateonthe formationofmicellescanbeneglected.
Brij 35 caninteractwiththe alginatevia hydrogenbonding mediatedby theheadgroupor viaassociationbythe aliphatic chain.Thiscouldleadtoareductioninchargeofthealginatechain, sincepotentialchargesofthealginatechainarecoveredby non-ionicBrij35halfmicelles.TheassociationwithBrij35wouldreduce thedensityofadsorptionsitesforthedivalentcationsand there-forethedensityofcross-linkedalginateandtheYoung’smodulus decrease.Ontheotherhandtheassociationviatheheadgroup couldalsohydrophobizethealginatechains,whichwouldleadto anassociationbetweenhydrophobicdomainsrelatedtoanincrease inYoung’smodulus.Obviously,thisinfluenceisminorsincethe Young’smodulusdecreaseswithincreasingBrij35concentration. Fig.6schematizesthisdiscussion.
Fig.6.Schemeofsurfactanteffect.Calciumionsbindstonegativecenterson algi-natechain(a)AdditionofSDSincreasesthenegativechargedensityandthereforea higheramountofcrosslinkers(calciumorbariumions)localizesaroundthealginate chain.ThisincreasedamountofcrosslinkerscausesanincreaseintheYoung mod-ulusandstiffness(b)NonionicBrij35coverssomeofnegativecentersofalginate chains,leadingtoadecreaseincrosslinkingionsandconsequentlygelation.Thus theresistancetobeingdeformedelasticallydecreases(c).
4.3. Ionspecificeffectsincross-linking
Sincetheionicradiusofbarium(135pm)islargerthancalcium (99pm),thehydrationshellaroundBa2+issmallerandlessordered
thanforCa2+.Thismakesiteasierforthenegativegroupsof
algi-natetointeractwithBa2+thantointeractwithCa2+.Thisleadsto
astrongercross-linkingandthereforeahigherYoung’smodulusin presenceofBa2+thanofCa2+.Ofcourseanincreaseincross-linker
(Ba2+)increasesthedensityofcross-linkingpointswhichincreases
theYoung’smodulusofalginateparticles.Itisalsoknownfrom lit-eraturethattheaffinityofalginatetowardsbariumisgreaterthan towardscalcium[20,21].Thisissupposedtoresultinstrongergel formationinthepresenceofbariumions.Thesameorderwasalso observedforbariumandcalciumalginatemicrobeads.[20].Itis notreallyclearwhytheYoung’smodulusdecreaseswith increas-ingCa2+concentration.Here,wecanonlyspeculate.Perhapsthe
Ca2+actsratherlikeasaltinthesystemthanasacross-linker.This
meansthattheCa2+ionsscreenthechargesinthesystem,which
mightreducetheYoung’smodulusoftheparticles. 5. Conclusion
ThepresentstudyshowsthattheYoung’smoduluscanbe eas-ilyvariedbymoreorderofmagnitudebychangingthealginate concentrationorthetypeorconcentrationofthesurfactantorthe cross-linkingdivalentcation.Theeffectofsurfactantonmechanical propertiesofcalciumandbariumalginatebeadswasinvestigated bycompressionmeasurementscombinedwiththeHertzTheory. The Young’s modulus of alginate beads changes withthe type ofusedsurfactantandmetalions.Brij35additiondecreasesthe Young’smoduluswhileSDSadditionincreasestheYoung’s mod-ulusofbothcalciumandbariumalginatebeads.Thisindicatesa differenttypeofassociationofSDSandBrij35tothealginatebeads duetodifferentchargesandthedifferentabilitytoform hydro-genbonding.IncaseofSDSonlyahydrophobicinteractionatlow alginatechargecantakeplace,whileBrij35 canassociatewith thealginatechainviaitheadgrouporviathealiphaticchain.The
Acknowledgment
H.Kaygusuzacknowledges Scientificand Technical Research Council of Turkey (TÜB˙ITAK)-BIDEB 2214/B scholarship pro-gramme.
References
[1]H.Kaygusuz,F.B.Erim,Alginate/BSA/montmorillonitecompositeswith enhancedproteinentrapmentandcontrolledreleaseefficiency,React.Funct. Polym.73(2013)1420–1425,http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym. 2013.07.014.
[2]H.Kaygusuz,M.Uysal,V.Adımcılar,F.B.Erim,Naturalalginatebiopolymer montmorilloniteclaycompositesforvitaminB2delivery,J.Bioact.Compat. Polym.30(2015)48–56,http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0883911514557014. [3]S.Uzas¸c¸ı,F.Tezcan,F.B.Erim,Removalofhexavalentchromiumfromaqueous
solutionbybariumioncross-linkedalginatebeads,Int.J.Environ.Sci.Technol. 11(2013)1861–1868,http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13762-013-0377-y. [4]H.Kaygusuz,M.H.C¸os¸kunırmak,N.Kahya,F.B.Erim,Aluminum
alginate-montmorillonitecompositebeadsfordefluoridationofwater,Water AirSoilPollut.226(2014)2257, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11270-014-2257-6.
[5]H.Kaygusuz,S.Uzas¸c¸ı,F.B.Erim,Removaloffluoridefromaqueoussolution usingaluminumalginatebeads,CLEAN−SoilAirWater43(2015)724–730, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clen.201300632.
[6]J.Yang,S.Chen,Y.Fang,Viscositystudyofinteractionsbetweensodium alginateandCTABindilutesolutionsatdifferentpHvalues,Carbohydr. Polym.75(2009)333–337,http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2008.07.037. [7]J.Yang,J.Zhao,Y.Fang,Calorimetricstudiesoftheinteractionbetween
sodiumalginateandsodiumdodecylsulfateindilutesolutionsatdifferentpH values,Carbohydr.Res.343(2008)719–725,http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. carres.2007.12.010.
Particuology9(2011)228–234,http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.partic.2010.12. 002.
[12]S.V.Bhujbal,G.A.Paredes-Juarez,S.P.Niclou,P.deVos,Factorsinfluencingthe mechanicalstabilityofalginatebeadsapplicableforimmunoisolationof mammaliancells,J.Mech.Behav.Biomed.Mater.37(2014)196–208,http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.05.020.
[13]G.Kaklamani,D.Cheneler,L.M.Grover,M.J.Adams,J.Bowen,Mechanical propertiesofalginatehydrogelsmanufacturedusingexternalgelation,J. Mech.Behav.Biomed.Mater.36(2014)135–142,http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. jmbbm.2014.04.013.
[14]R.Pamies,R.R.Schmidt,M.del,C.L.Martínez,J.G.delaTorre,Theinfluenceof monoanddivalentcationsondiluteandnon-diluteaqueoussolutionsof sodiumalginates,Carbohydr.Polym.80(2010)248–253,http://dx.doi.org/10. 1016/j.carbpol.2009.11.020.
[15]RCoreTeam,R:ALanguageandEnvironmentforStatisticalComputing,2013 http://www.r-project.org.
[16]H.Hertz,ÜberdieberührungfesterelastischerKörper,J.FürDieReineUnd Angew.Math.92(1881)156–171.
[17]K.Kim,J.Cheng,Q.Liu,X.Y.Wu,Y.Sun,Investigationofmechanicalproperties ofsofthydrogelmicrocapsulesinrelationtoproteindeliveryusingaMEMS forcesensor,J.Biomed.Mater.Res.A92(2010)103–113,http://dx.doi.org/10. 1002/jbm.a.32338.
[18]S.J.Horn,E.Moen,K.Østgaard,Directdeterminationofalginatecontentin brownalgaebynearinfra-red(NIR)spectroscopy,J.Appl.Phycol.11(1999) 9–13,http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1008024009954.
[19]N.Öztekin,S.Bas¸kan,F.B.Erim,Determinationofalginatecopolymerin pharmaceuticalformulationsbymicellarelectrokineticchromatography,J. Chromatogr.B850(2007)488–492,http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb. 2006.12.025.
[20]A.Haug,O.Smidsrød,Selectivityofsomeanionicpolymersfordivalentmetal ions,ActaChem.Scand.24(1970)843–854.
[21]Y.A.Mørch,I.Donati,B.L.Strand,G.Skjåk-Braek,EffectofCa2+,Ba2+,andSr2+ onalginatemicrobeads,Biomacromolecules7(2006)1471–1480,http://dx. doi.org/10.1021/bm060010d.