Anahtar Kelimeler:

(1)

Cilt 4 1, Haziran 2020, Sayfa: 143-167.

Politics, Economics and Administrative Sciences Journal of Kirsehir Ahi Evran University Volume 4, Issue 1, June 2020, Page: 143-167.

Aplication Date: 11 2020 / May 11, 2020 Makale Kabul Tarihi / Acceptance Date: 26 2020 / May 26, 2020

MAKALE / ARTICLE:

SAVUNMACI-

AN ANALYSIS WITHIN THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN DEFENSIVE AND OFFENSIVE REALISM ON TURKISH FOREIGN POLICY

Orhan BATTIR

^*

-

er

Anahtar Kelimeler:

* e Ul .

E-posta: obattir@kmu.edu.tr -0002-6856-8351.

(2)

ABSTRACT

In this study, a comparison of the basic concepts of traditional Turkish foreign policy with the new foreign policy approaches that have been determined recently has been made through defensive realism and offensive realism theories. The defensive realist approach, which is taken up within the theory of realism, mostly aims to protect the status quo and argues that it is the primary goal of states to ensure their own security. On the other hand, while the offensive understanding of realism was in search of power, it also aimed to change the status quo. When considered in this context more defensive foreign policy pursued by Turkey until the 2000s shows that an approach executed.

However, it is possible to say that while the defensive tendency has continued in many areas especially in the recent period, it has moved to an offensive position especially in some areas containing national security threat. In this study, it has been analyzed whether Turkish foreign policy, which has been followed recently, is defensive or offensive or in balance. regional and global developments affecting foreign policy and the development of direct or indirect actor / opposite side of the case of countries that have been examined with examples how to manage a process of Turkey's foreign policy. Analysis of Turkey's defensive-offensive realism in foreign policy has benefited from the results of distinction while cross-border operations of the Turkish Armed Forces. In this study, the changes and transformations in Turkish foreign policy in general have been mentioned, and evaluations have been made within the framework of defensive and offensive realist theories emerging within the theory of neorealism. In this study, the changes and transformations in Turkish foreign policy in general have been mentioned, and evaluations have been made within the framework of defensive and offensive realist theories emerging within the theory of neorealism.

Keywords: Change in Foreign Policy; Defensive Realism; Offensive Realism; Turkish Foreign Policy.

- -

si

e

(3)

-siyasi, ek - -

- - -

hedef edinir (Gilpin, 1981, s. 50-

al

-

analizinde

- 119).

realizm-

- -

(4)

-

- -

-11).

ala

(5)

- - -

-temel -

-

- -

(6)

politikalara

(Offensive) Realizm

izleme

-

- -

(7)

le uyumlu

-

-196).

e ekonomik

(8)

-

-1 gemisini, esi ve

radeli, 2012, s. 160-

-

mevcut

(9)

- -

-A

r

-

- rin seyrinde

-

(10)

Kuv

s. 258-

4. SAVUNMACI-

- -

Bu yeni d

(11)

, 2009, s. 23).

2006, s. 26).

-

- - -Rusya

-

(12)

-31).

lka

um

181-

-

(13)

uygulanan politika

konunun

s ve Ege

-

lendirilebilir.

(14)

edilgen tutun sergilemekten uzak -

-ABD

Filistin

*, -

-280).

-

(15)

Yine NATO

- lmaz. Stratejik

-ABD i -

yap

- -35 ve Filistin krizleri

PYD/YPG/PK

n

- n ani

-

(16)

e-

-

- -

yeni bir zemin

yrin

meler ve

-400 hava

-400 hava savunma sisteminin -

(17)

-

iye-

-315).

Cumhuriyeti ile Ermenist

(18)

kadar aktif bir politi -

-324).

u

- da ifade etmek gerekir.

-

(19)

2012, s. 319).

-

olsa da ilk

-

etmektedir.

(20)

- -

(21)

2012, s. 45).

-en-

-

ha da

-

(22)

ek - -

e siyasi

k

(23)

(24)

, , 4 (37), s. 39- 45.

Dergisi, 4(15), s. 39-60.

-

Politika Dergisi, 5(17), s. 23-53.

(Edt.),

-

,

BBC NEWS (2013).

https://www.bbc.com/turkce/haberler/2013/03/130322_israil_turkiye_ozur

Kriz .

41 Kriz,

, evi.

DW (Deutsche Welle) (2018). , 28.02.2020 tarihinde

https://www.dw.com/tr/abde- - -b- - -42228950 Ege

, 24(1), s. 321-335.

Elman, C. (2007). Realism, (s. 11- International Relations Theory for the Twenty- first Century, London: Routledge Press.

SETA Analiz

Gilpin, R. (1981). War and Change in World Politics, New York: Cambridge Universty Press.

-

Turkish Studies - International Periodical For The Languages, terature and History of Turkish or Turkic, 6(1), s. 1139-1154.

(Edt.), ,

(25)

-

bul: SETA

, 2(7), s. 31-60.

- (Edt.),

Mearsheimer, J. (2001). The Tragedy of Great Power Politics, New York and London: WW Norton & Company.

41 kriz,

-

-06.

- , Ankara:

Waltz, Kenneth N. (2000). The Structural Realism after the Cold War, International Security, 25(1), s. 5-41.