• Sonuç bulunamadı

Introduction to Economics I Lecture 14

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Introduction to Economics I Lecture 14"

Copied!
10
0
0

Yükleniyor.... (view fulltext now)

Tam metin

(1)

Introduction to Economics I

Lecture 14

(2)

Lecture 14

What Is General Equilibrium Theory?

General equilibrium theory, or

Walrasian

general equilibrium,

attempts to explain the functioning of the macroeconomy as a

whole, rather than as collections of individual market

(3)

Lecture 14

What Is General Equilibrium Theory?

The theory was first developed by the French economist Leon

Walras in the late 19th century.

It stands in contrast with partial equilibrium theory, or Marshallian

partial equilibrium, which only analyzes specific markets or

(4)

Lecture 14

Definition of Pareto efficiency

Pareto efficiency is said to occur when it is impossible to make one

party better off without making someone worse off.

A

Pareto improvement

is said to occur when at least one individual

(5)

Lecture 14

Pareto efficiency and Market failure

Market failure

is an inefficient allocation of resources in a free

market. Market failure implies Pareto inefficiency – because it is

possible to improve.

For example, the over-consumption of demerit goods

(drugs/tobacco) leads to external costs to non-smokers and also

early death for smokers. A tax on cigarettes could encourage

people to quit smoking, and raise revenue for treating

smoking-related diseases.

(6)

Lecture 14

Pareto efficiency and equity

An outcome may be seen as a Pareto improvement, but, it doesn’t

mean this is a satisfactory outcome or fair. There could still be

inequality after a Pareto improvement.

A society could have Pareto efficiency but large degrees of inequality.

Suppose there is a pie and three people; the most equitable solution

would be to divide into three equal parts. But, if it was cut in half and

shared amongst two people, it would be seen as Pareto efficient –

because the third person doesn’t lose out – (even though he doesn’t

share in the pie).

(7)

Lecture 14

Simple Example of Pareto Efficiency - I

Consider the following background information for an allocation problem: •Two types of goods: Apples and oranges (same number of each good). •Two individuals: Tina and John.

Consider the preferences for each individual:

•Tina does not have a preference for apples or oranges (Tina is indifferent between apples and oranges).

•John has a preference for apples over oranges. Consider the following allocation:

•Apples are all allocated to Tina. •Oranges are all allocated to John.

(8)

Lecture 14

Simple Example of Pareto Efficiency - I

Is the allocation above Pareto efficient?

To determine whether an allocation is a Pareto efficiency, it is important to determine if a Pareto improvement is possible. As in, is there a way to make an individual better off without making someone else worse off?

In the example above, a Pareto improvement is possible. If the allocation of oranges went to John and the allocation of apples went to Tina, John would be better off while no one would be worse off.

Therefore, the current allocation of apples to Tina and oranges to John is Pareto

inefficient. For the allocation to be Pareto efficient, apples should be allocated to John and oranges should be allocated to Tina.

(9)

Lecture 14

Simple Example of Pareto Efficiency - II

Consider the following background information for an allocation problem: One type of good: A chocolate bar.

Two individuals: Tina and John.

Consider the preferences for each individual:

Tina prefers as much of the chocolate bar as possible. John prefers as much of the chocolate bar as possible. Consider three potential allocations:

1. A chocolate bar is all allocated to Tina. 2. A chocolate bar is all allocated to John.

(10)

Lecture 14

Simple Example of Pareto Efficiency - II

Is each allocation above Pareto efficient?

Since each individual prefers as much of the chocolate bar as possible, there is not an

allocation that makes an individual better off without making someone else worse off.

Therefore:

1. Is Pareto efficient

2. Is Pareto efficient

3. Is Pareto efficient

4. Consider that a chocolate bar is half allocated to Tina and 1/4 allocated to John.

This allocation is NOT Pareto efficient, since ¼ of resources are not used, and by allocating

that amount of chocolate bar either Tina or John makes them better off without maling

someone else worse off.

Referanslar

Benzer Belgeler

Singular Plural Nervus Nervi Nucleus Nuclei Bronchus Bronchi Musculus Musculi Singular - Plural.. • When the words ending in um are plural, um is removed and

Total cost is the total economic cost of production and is made up of variable cost , which varies according to the quantity of a good produced and includes inputs such as labor

Unlike fixed costs , which remain constant regardless of output, variable costs are a direct function of production volume , rising whenever production expands and falling whenever

• If firms are making a loss then firms will leave the industry causing price to rise....

• In the short-run, if a firm has a negative economic profit, it should continue to operate if its price exceeds its average variable cost.. • It should shut down if its price is

• If the index is below 1000, the market is not considered concentrated, while an index above 2000 indicates a highly concentrated market or industry – the higher the figure

The decision regarding price and output of any firm does not affect the behavior of other firms in a group,i.e., impact of the decision made by a single firm is spread

In competitive markets, firms are price takers and they can not affect the market price....