• Sonuç bulunamadı

Başlık: More on α-topological spacesYazar(lar):MODAK, Shyamapada ; ISLAM, Md. MonirulCilt: 66 Sayı: 2 Sayfa: 323-331 DOI: 10.1501/Commua1_0000000822 Yayın Tarihi: 2017 PDF

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Başlık: More on α-topological spacesYazar(lar):MODAK, Shyamapada ; ISLAM, Md. MonirulCilt: 66 Sayı: 2 Sayfa: 323-331 DOI: 10.1501/Commua1_0000000822 Yayın Tarihi: 2017 PDF"

Copied!
9
0
0

Yükleniyor.... (view fulltext now)

Tam metin

(1)

C om mun.Fac.Sci.U niv.A nk.Series A 1 Volum e 66, N umb er 2, Pages 323–331 (2017) D O I: 10.1501/C om mua1_ 0000000822 ISSN 1303–5991

http://com munications.science.ankara.edu.tr/index.php?series= A 1

MORE ON -TOPOLOGICAL SPACES

SHYAMAPADA MODAK AND MD. MONIRUL ISLAM

Abstract. The aim of this paper is to introduce a new topology with the help of a-open sets. For this job, we shall de…ne two new types of set and discuss its properties in detail and characterize Njastad’s -open sets and Levine’s semi-open sets through these new types of set.

1. Introduction

The study of ideal in topological space was introduced and studied by Kuratowski [15] and Vaidyanathaswamy [22] but in this study Jankovic and Hamlett gave a new dimension through their paper “New topologies from old via ideals" [14]. Now a days the authors like Navaneethakrishnan et al. [19], Hamlett and Jankovic [12], Arenas et al. [4], Nasef and Mahmoud [18], Mukherjee et al. [17] Dontchev et al. [6] and many others have enriched this study. The authors Al-Omari et al. [1, 2] in their papers “a-local function and its properties in ideal topological spaces" and “The <a operator in ideal topological spaces", have studied Ekici’s [7, 8, 9] a-open

sets in terms of ideals. They have obtained a new topology with the help of two operators viz. <a and ()a , and have shown that this topology is …ner than Ekici’s

a - topology.

In this paper, we have further considered the space which is the joint venture of a-topology and an ideal as like Al-omari et al. have considered in [2, 1]. Through this paper we will solve the question “how much …ner is Noiri’s et al.’s topology than Ekici’s topology?" For solution of this question we have considered Njastad’s

-open sets [20] from literature.

2. Preliminaries

In this section we have discussed some preliminary concepts of literature and introduce some prime results for discussing the paper.

Let A be a subset of a topological space (X; ), then ‘Int(A)’and ‘Cl(A)’will denote ‘interior of A’and ‘closure of A’respectively.

Received by the editors: November 07, 2016, Accepted: February 02, 2017. 2010 Mathematics Subject Classi…cation. 540A, 54C10.

Key words and phrases. set, a-open set, a-local function, <aoperator.

c 2 0 1 7 A n ka ra U n ive rsity C o m m u n ic a tio n s d e la Fa c u lté d e s S c ie n c e s d e l’U n ive rs ité d ’A n ka ra . S é rie s A 1 . M a th e m a t ic s a n d S t a tis tic s .

(2)

We de…ne following as a mathematical tool for this research article:

De…nition 1. Let A be a subset of a topological space (X; ). A is said to be regular open [21] (resp. semi-open [16, 11], semi-pre open [3], -open [20]) if A = Int(Cl(A)) (resp. A Cl(Int(A)); A Cl(Int(Cl(A))); A Int(Cl(Int(A)))). De…nition 2. [23] A subset A of a topological space (X; ) is said to be -open if, for each x 2 A, there exists a regular open set G such that x 2 G A.

The complement of -open set is called -closed. Let (X; ) be a topological space, then the point x 2 X is called -cluster point of A if Int(Cl(V )) \ A 6= ;, for each open set V containing x.

The -closure of A is denoted as Cl (A) [23] and it is a set of all -cluster point of A. In this regards, Int (A) [23] is the -interior of A and it is the union of all regular open sets of (X; ) contained in A. If Int (A) = A for a topological space (X; ), then A is -open and conversely [23]. It is remarkable that the collection of all -open sets in a topological space (X; ) forms a topology and it is denoted as

[23].

De…nition 3. [8, 9, 10] A subset A of (X; ) is said to be a-open (resp. a-closed) if A Int(Cl(Int (A))) (resp. Cl(Int(Cl (A))) A).

The family of a-open sets in (X; ) forms a topology on X. This collection is denoted as a[8], and a(x) is denoted as the collection of all a-open sets containing

x.

In this paper we also denote ‘aCl’ by the means of closure operator of Ekici’s a topology [7, 8].

Hereditary class and a-local function are also the mathematical tool for this paper:

De…nition 4. [15] A collection I }(X) is said to be an ideal on X if B A 2 I implies B 2 I and A; B 2 I implies A [ B 2 I.

Let I be an ideal on the topological space (X; ), then (X; ; I) is called an ideal topological space.

According to Al-Omari et al. [2, 1], we give the following:

The a-local function ()a : }(X) ! }(X) for a subset A of an ideal topological

space (X; ; I) is de…ned as (A)a = fx 2 X : U \ A =2 I; for every U 2 a(x)g,

and as like complement operator of ()a , <a: }(X) ! }(X) is de…ned as <a(A) =

X n (X n A)a = fx 2 X : there exists U

x 2 a(x) such that Uxn A 2 Ig.

Due to the operator ()a , we have a topology a [1] whose one of the basis is

(I; ) = fV n I : V 2 a; I 2 Ig [1]. In this respect, we will denote ‘Inta ’and

‘Cla ’as ‘interior’operator and ‘closure’operator of (X; a ) respectively.

Following results help us for repairing the paper:

Theorem 1. [1] Let (X; ; I) be an ideal topological space and U 2 a. Then

(3)

Corollary 2. Let A be a subset of an ideal topological space (X; ; I), then aInt(A) <a(A).

Theorem 3. [1] Let A be a subset of an ideal topological space (X; ; I) with a\I =

;. Then <a(A) (A)a .

Corollary 4. Let A be a subset of an ideal topological space (X; ; I) with a\I = ;. Then <a(A) aCl(A).

Lemma 5. Let (X; ; I) be an ideal topological space and O 2 a. Then a\ I = ;

if and only if (O)a = aCl(O).

Proof. Let a\ I = ; and ; 6= O 2 a . Now Oa aCl(O) always. For reverse

inclusion, let x 2 aCl(O). Therefore all neighbourhoods Ux 2 a(x), Ux\ O 6= ;

implies Ux\ O =2 I, since a\ I = ;. Therefore x 2 (O)a . Hence (O)a = aCl(O).

Conversely let O 2 a, (O)a = aCl(O). Then Xa = X and this implies I \ a = ; [2].

Proposition 6. Let (X; ; I) be an ideal topological space with a\ I = ;. Then

following hold:

(1) For A X, <a(A) aInt(aCl(A)).

(2) For a-closed subset A; <a(A) A.

(3) For A X; aInt(aCl(A)) = <a(aInt(aCl(A))).

(4) For any a-regular open subset A; A = <a(A).

(5) For any O 2 a; <

a(O) aInt(aCl(O)) (O)a .

Proof. (1) From Theorem 3, <a(A) (A)a . Then <a(A) aCl(A), and since

<a(A) is open, <a(A) aInt(aCl(A)).

(3) <a(aInt(aCl(A))) (aInt(aCl(A))a = aCl(aInt(aCl(A))) (from Lemma

5) aCl(A). Thus <a(aInt(aCl(A))) aInt(aCl(A)).

Reverse inclusion: aInt(aCl(A)) <a(aInt(aCl(A))) (from Theorem 1).

Thus aInt(aCl(A)) = <a(aInt(aCl(A))).

3. <a aCl sets

De…nition 5. Let (X; ; I) be an ideal topological space and A X, A is said to be a <a aCl set if A aCl(<a(A)).

The collection of all <a aCl sets in (X; ; I) is denoted by <a(X; a).

Note 3.1. Let (X; ; I) be an ideal topological space. If A 2 a, then A 2

<a(X; a).

Later, we shall given the example for the converse of this note.

Theorem 7. Let fAi : i 2 g be a collection of nonempty <a aCl sets in an

(4)

Proof. For each i; Ai aCl(<a(Ai)) aCl(<a(

S

i2 Ai)). This implies that

S i2 Ai aCl(<a( S i2 Ai)). Thus S i2 Ai2 <a(X; a).

For intersecting of two <a aCl sets, we give following example:

Example 1. Let X = fe; b; c; dg; = f;; X; feg; fcg; fe; bg; fe; cg; fe; b; cg; fe; c; dgg; I = f;; fbgg. Regular open sets are: ;; X; fcg; fe; bg. Then a= f;; X; fcg; fe; bg;

fe; b; cgg. Therefore <a(fc; dg) = X n (fe; bg)a = X n fe; b; dg = fcg and

aCl(<a(fc; dg)) = fc; dg. Again <a(fe; b; dg) = X n(fcg)a = X nfc; dg = fe; bg and

aCl(<a(fe; b; dg)) = fe; b; dg. Now <a(fdg) = X n (fe; b; cg)a = X n fe; b; c; dg = ;.

Hence we have fc; dg and fe; b; dg are <a aCl sets but they are not a-open sets.

Again their intersection fdg is not a <a aCl set.

We show that the intersecting of a <a aCl set and an - set of a is also a

<a aCl set.

Theorem 8. Let (X; ; I) be an ideal topological space and A 2 <a(X; a). If

U 2 a , then U \ A 2 <a(X; a) ( a denotes the collection of all -open sets in

(X; a)).

Proof. Let G be a-open, and A X, then it is obvious that G \ aCl(A) aCl(G \ A) ... (i).

If V is a-open, then V aInt(aCl(V )) and it is obvious that aCl(aInt(aCl(V ))) aCl(V ). Hence

aCl(V ) = aCl(aInt(aCl(A))) ... (ii). Again for A and B subsets of X,

<a(A \ B) = <a(A) \ <a(B) [1] ... (iii).

Let U 2 a and A 2 <

a(X; a), then we have U \ A aInt(aCl(aInt(U ))) \

aCl(<a(A)) aInt(aCl(<a(U )))\aCl(<a(A)) (Corollary 2). Since aInt(aCl(<a(U )))

is a-open, from (i) we have

U \ A aCl[aInt(aCl(<a(U ))) \ <a(A)] = aCl[aInt[aCl(<a(U )) \ <a(A)]], since

<a(A) is a-open. Now by again from (i), we have U \ A aCl[aInt[aCl(<a(U ) \

<a(A))]]. Since <a(U )\<a(A) is a-open then from (ii), we get U \A aCl(<a(U )\

<a(A)) = aCl(<a(U \ A)) (using (iii)). Therefore, U \ A 2 <a(X; a).

As a a for a topological space (X; ), then we have following corollary:

Corollary 9. Let (X; ; I) be a topological space and A 2 <a(X; a). If U 2 a,

then U \ A 2 <a(X; a).

For next, we recall that, a subset A of an ideal topological space (X; ; I) is said to be Ia-dense [1] if (A)a = X.

Theorem 10. A =2 <a(X; a) if and only if there exists x 2 A such that there is a a - neighbourhood V

(5)

Proof. Let A =2 <a(X; a). We are to show that there exists an element x 2 A and

a a - neighbourhood V

x of x satisfying that X n A is relatively Ia - dense in Vx.

Since A * aCl(<a(A)), there exists x 2 X such that x 2 A but x =2 aCl(<a(A)).

Hence there exists a a - neighbourhood V

x of x such that Vx\ <a(A) = ;. This

implies that Vx\(X n(X nA)a = ; and so Vx (X nA)a . Let U be any nonempty

a-open set in Vx. Since Vx (X n A)a , therefore U \ (X n A) =2 I. This implies

that (X n A) is relatively Ia - dense in Vx.

The converse part is obvious by reversing process.

Relations between <a aCl set with generalized open sets:

Theorem 11. Let (X; ; I) be a topological space, then SO(X; a) <

a(X; a)

(SO(X; a) denotes the collection of all semi-open sets in (X; a)).

Proof. For A aCl(aInt(A)), A aCl(aInt(A)) aCl(<a(aInt(A))) aCl(<a(A)).

Thus SO(X; a) <a(X; a).

Theorem 12. Let A be a <a aCl set in a topological space (X; ; I), where a \ I = ;. Then A 2 SP O(X; a) (SP O(X; a) denotes the collection of all

semi-preopen sets in (X; a)).

Let (X; ; I) be an ideal topological space, and In( a) is denoted as the collection

of all nowhere dense subsets of (X; a).

Lemma 13. Let (X; ; I) be an ideal topological space, where I = In( a), then for

A X; <a(A) = aInt(aCl(aInt(A))).

Proof. Proof is obvious from the fact that <a(A) = X n (X n A)a and (A)a =

aInt(aCl(aInt(A))).

Theorem 14. Let (X; ; I) be an ideal topological space, where I = In( a), then

<a(X; a) = SO(X; a).

Proof. Let A 2 <a(X; a), therefore A aCl(<a(A)) = aCl(aInt(aCl(aInt(A))))

(from Lemma 13) = aCl(aInt(A)). Thus A 2 SO(X; a).

Suppose that A 2 SO(X; a). Then A aCl(aInt(A)), so aInt(A) 6= ;. We know that aInt(A) <a(A) by Corollary 2. Thus A aCl(aInt(A))

aCl(<a(A)). Hence the Theorem.

In o.h.i. space two concepts semi-preopen set and <a aCl set are synonymous,

where o.h.i. space is de…ned as follows:

A space (X; ) is said to be resolvable [13] if there is a dense subset D of X such that X n D are dense in (X; ). Otherwise it is said to irresolvable [13]. Real line with usual topology is an example of a resolvable space. A space (X; ) is called open hereditarily irresolvable (in short o.h.i.) [5] if every nonempty open subset of it is irresolvable.

(6)

Theorem 15. Let (X; ; I) be an ideal topological space, where (X; a) is an o.h.i.

space, a\ I = ;. Then <

a(X; a) = SP O(X; a).

Proof. We shall prove only the inclusion SP O(X; a) <

a(X; a), reverse inclusion

has already been done. Let A 2 SP O(X; a). Then A aCl(aInt(aCl(A))). Let

x 2 aInt(aCl(A)). Therefore there exists a nonempty a-open set Ox (containing

x) such that Ox aCl(A). Now it is obvious that Ox\ A is dense in Ox. Since the

space is o.h.i., therefore aInt(Ox\ A) is dense in Ox, that is Ox aCl(aInt(A))

and hence x 2 aCl(aInt(A)). Thus aInt(aCl(A)) aCl(aInt(A)). Now A aCl(aInt(aCl(A))) aCl(aInt(A)). But aInt(A) <a(aInt(A)) <a(A), thus

A aCl(<a(A)). Therefore A 2 <a(X; a).

4. - topology of a

De…nition 6. Let (X; ; I) be an ideal topological space and A X. A is said to be a <a - set if A aInt(aCl(<a(A))).

The collection of all <a sets in (X; ; I) is denoted as a

<a

. It is obvious that a a<a

<a(X; a).

Theorem 16. Let (X; ; I) be an ideal topological space with a\ I = ;, then the

collection a<a = fA X : A aInt(aCl(<a(A)))g forms a topology on X.

Proof. We shall prove only …nite intersection property: Let A1; A22 a

<a

. We are to show that A1\ A22 a

<a

. If A1\ A2= ;, we are

done. Let A1\ A26= ;. Let x 2 A1\ A2. Now A1 aInt(aCl(<a(A1))) and A2

aInt(aCl(<a(A2))), implies that x 2 aInt(aCl(<a(A1))) \ aInt(aCl(<a(A2))). So

x 2 aInt[aCl(<a(A1)) \ aCl(<a(A2))]. Therefore there exists an a-open set Vx

containing x such that Vx aCl(<a(A1)) \ aCl(<a(A2)). Let Ux be any

a-neighbourhood of x. Then ; 6= Vx\Ux aCl(<a(A1)) and Vx\Ux aCl(<a(A2)).

Let y 2 Vx\ Ux. Consider any open set Gycontaining y. Without loss of generality

we may suppose that Gy Vx\Ux. So Gy\<a(A1) 6= ;. From de…nition of <a(A1)

there exists a nonempty a-open set U such that U Gyand U nA12 I. Again U

aCl(<a(A2)), so there exists a nonempty a-open set U0 U such that U0n A22 I.

Now U0n(A

1\A2) = (U0nA1)[(U0nA2) (U nA1)[(U0nA2) 2 I (…nite additivity).

Hence from de…nition U0 <

a(A1\ A2). Since U0 Gy; Gy\ <a(A1\ A2) 6= ;,

therefore y 2 aCl(<a(A1\ A2). Since y was any point of Ux\ Vx, it follows that

Ux\ Vx aCl(<a(A1\ A2)), implies that x 2 aInt(aCl(<a(A1\ A2))). Thus

A1\ A2 aInt(aCl(<a(A1\ A2))). Hence A1\ A22 a

<a

.

Theorem 17. Let (X; ; I) be an ideal topological space, where a\ I = ;, then

a a<a

.

Corollary 18. Let (X; ; I) be an ideal topological space, where I = In( a), then a = a<a.

(7)

Lemma 19. Let (X; ; I) be an ideal topological space, where a\ I = ;. Then

<a(A) 6= ; if and only if A contains a nonempty a -interior.

Proof. Let <a(A) 6= ;. Therefore <a(A) = [fM : M 2 a; M n A 2 Ig 6= ;,

implies that there exists ; 6= M 2 a such that M n A 2 I. Let M n A = P , where

P 2 I. So M n P A where M n P 6= ;, since a\ I = ;. Since M n P 2 a , so

that A contains a nonempty a - interior.

Conversely suppose that A contains a a - interior M n P (say), where M 2

a

; P 2 I. Thus M n P A, that is M n A P . Hence M n A 2 I. So [fM : M 2 a; M n A 2 Ig 6= ;. This implies that <

a(A) 6= ;.

Corollary 20. Let x 2 X. Then fxg is open in (X; a ) if and only if fxg 2

<a(X; a).

Corollary 21. Let x 2 X, then fxg 2 a<a if and only if fxg 2 <a(X; a).

Theorem 22. a<a is exactly the collection such that A 2 a<a

and B 2 <a(X; a)

implies A \ B 2 <a(X; a).

Proof. Let A 2 a<a and B 2 <

a(X; a). Now we are to show that A \ B 2

<a(X; a). If A \ B = ;, we are done. Let A \ B 6= ;. Let x 2 A \ B. This implies

that x 2 aInt(aCl(<a(A))), therefore aInt(aCl(<a(A))) is a a-neighbourhood of

x. Consider any a-neighbourhood Ux of x, then Ux\ aInt(aCl(<a(A))) is a

a-neighbourhood of x. Since x 2 B aCl(<a(B)), then Ux\ aInt(aCl(<a(A))) \

<a(B) 6= ;. Let V = Ux\ aInt(aCl(<a(A))) \ <a(B), then V aCl(<a(A)).

This implies that Ux\ <a(A) \ <a(B) = V \ <a(A) 6= ;, since <a(A) is a-open.

Therefore x 2 aCl(<a(A) \ <a(B)), that is x 2 aCl(<a(A \ B)). Hence A \ B

aCl(<a(A \ B)), therefore A \ B 2 <a(X; a).

Next we consider a subset A of X such that A \ B 2 <a(X; a) for each

B 2 <a(X; a). We show that A 2 a

<a

, that is A aInt(aCl(<a(A))). If

possible suppose that x 2 A but x =2 aInt(aCl(<a(A))). Therefore x 2 A \ [X n

aInt(aCl(<a(A)))] = A \ aCl(X n aCl(<a(A))) = A \ aCl(G) (say). It is obvious

that G = X n aCl(<a(A)) is a nonempty a open set. Since x 2 aCl(G) then for

all a-open sets Vx containing x, Vx\ G 6= ;. Therefore Vx\ <a(G) 6= ;, since

G <a(G). This implies that

x 2 aCl(<a(G)) aCl(<a(fxg [ G)) ... (i).

Again

G aCl(<a(G)) aCl(<a(fxg [ G)) ...(ii).

From (i) and (ii) fxg [ G aCl(<a(fxg [ G)). Thus fxg [ G 2 <a(X; a). Now

by given condition A \ (fxg [ G) is a <a aCl set.

We shall prove that A \ (fxg [ G) = fxg.

If possible suppose that there exists y 2 X and x 6= y such that y 2 A\(fxg[G). So y 2 A and y 2 G. Now A = A \ X and X 2 <a(X; a), again by given condition

A 2 <a(X; a). Since y 2 A, and y 2 aCl(<a(A)) - a contradiction to the fact that

(8)

fxg 2 a<a. So fxg aInt(aCl(<a(fxg))) = aInt(aCl(<a(A \ (fxg [ G))))

aInt(aCl(<a(A))). But x 2 aInt(aCl(<a(A))), that is A 2 a

<a

.

Theorem 23. Let (X; ; I) be an ideal topological space, where a\ I = ;. Then SO(X; a ) = <

a(X; a).

Proof. Let A 2 SO(X; a ). Then A Cla (Inta (A)) = Cla [<

a(A) \ A]

aCl(<a(A) \ A) aCl(<a(A)). Thus A 2 <a(X; a). For reverse inclusion, let

A 2 <a(X; a). We show that A 2 SO(X; a ). Take x 2 A. Consider G12 (I; )

[2] such that x 2 G1. Then G1is of the form G1= G n E, where G 2 a; E 2 I. So

x 2 G. Since A aCl(<a(A)) and G 2 a; G \ (<a(A)) 6= ;. Let y 2 G \ (<a(A)).

Thus there exists Oy 2 a such that Oyn A 2 I by de…nition of <a(A). Consider

; 6= G \ Oy. So (G \ Oy) n A 2 I (by heredity). Let G0 = G \ Oy. Then

G0 6= ;; G0 2 a and G0n A = P say where P 2 I and so G0 n P A. Hence G0n (E [ P ) A where G0n (E [ P ) 6= ;, since a\ I = ;. Write M = G0n (E [ P ). Then ; 6= M 2 a such that M A \ (G n E). Hence A contains a nonempty

a -open set M contained in G n E = G

1. Since x is an arbitrary point of A, we

get A Cla (Inta (A)). Therefore A 2 SO(X; a ).

Corollary 24. Let x 2 X, then fxg 2 SO(X; a ) if and only if fxg 2 a<a. Theorem 25. a<a is exactly the collection such that A 2 a<a and B 2 SO(X; a ) imply A \ B 2 SO(X; a ), where a \ I = ;.

Theorem 26. [20] Let (X; ) be a topological space. consists of exactly those sets A for which A \ B 2 SO(X; ) for all B 2 SO(X; ).

From above Theorem we get the representation of - sets of (X; a):

Theorem 27. Let (X; ; I) be an ideal topological space with a\ I = ;. Then a<a

= a .

Acknowledgement: Authors are thankful to Professor Erdal Ekici for sending reprints.

References

[1] Al-Omari, W., Noorani, M., Noiri, T. and Al-Omari, A.: The <aoperator in ideal topological

spaces, Creat. Math. Inform., 25, 1-10 (2016).

[2] Al-Omari, W., Noorani, M. and Al-Omari, A.: a-local function and its properties in ideal topological spaces, Fasc. Math., 53, 1-15 (2014).

[3] Andrijevic, D.: On the topology generated by preopen sets, Math. Bech., 39, 367-376 (1987). [4] Arenas, F. G., Dontchev J. and Puertas, M L.: Idealization of some weak separation axioms,

Acta Math. hungar., 89, 47-53 (2000).

[5] Chattopadhyay C. and Roy, U. K.: -sets, irresolvable and resolvable space, Math. Solvaca., 42, 371-378 (1992).

[6] Dontchev, J., Ganster, M. and Rose, D.: Ideal reslovalibity, Topology and its Appl., 93, 1-16 (1999).

(9)

[7] Ekici, E.: On a-open sets, A -sets and decompositions of continuity and supra-continuity, Annales Univ. Sci. Budapest., 51, 39-51 (2008).

[8] Ekici, E.: A note on a-open sets and e -open sets, Filomat, 22, 89-96 (2008). [9] Ekici, E.: New forms of contra-continuity, Carpathian J. Math., 24, 37-45 (2008).

[10] Ekici, E.: Some generalizations of almost contra-super-continuity, Filomat, 21, 31-44 (2007). [11] Hamlett, T. R.: A correction to the paper “Semi-open sets and semi-continuity in topological

spaces" by Norman Levine, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 49, 458-460 (1975).

[12] Hamlett, T. R. and Jankovic, D.: Ideals in topological spaces and the set operator , Bull. U.M.I., 7, 863-874 (1990).

[13] Hewitt, E.: A problem of set theoretic topology, Duke Math. J., 10, 309-333 (1943). [14] Jankovic, D. and Hamlett T. R.: New topologies from old via ideal, Amer. Math. Monthly.,

97, 295-310 (1990).

[15] Kuratowski, K.: Topology, Vol. I, New York, Academic Press, 1966.

[16] Levine, N.: Semi-open sets and semi-continuity in topological spaces, Amer. Math. Monthly, 70, 36-41 (1963).

[17] Mukherjee, M. N., Roy B. and Sen, R.: On extension of topological spaces in terms of ideals, Topology and its Appl., 154, 3167-3172 (2007).

[18] Nasef, A. A. and Mahmoud, R. A.: Some applications via fuzzy ideals, chaos Solutions Fractals, 13, 825-831 (2002).

[19] Navaneethakrishnan, M. and Paulraj, J.: g-closed sets in ideal topological space, Acta Math. Hungar., 119, 365-371 (2008).

[20] Njastad, O.: On some classes of nearly open sets, Paci…c J Math., 15, 961-970 (1965). [21] Stone, M. H.: Application of the theory of boolean rings to genearted topology, Trans. Amer.

Math. Soc., 41, 375-381 (1937).

[22] Vaidyanathaswamy, R.: The localization theory in set-topology, Proc. Indian Acad. Sci., 20, 51-61 (1945).

[23] Velicko, N. V.: H-closed topological spaces, Amer. Math. Soc. Trans., 78, 103-118 (1968). Current address : Shyamapada Modak: Department of Mathematics, University of Gour Banga P.O. Mokdumpur, Malda - 732103, India

E-mail address : spmodak2000@yahoo.co.in

Current address : Md. Monirul Islam: Department of Mathematics, University of Gour Banga P.O. Mokdumpur, Malda - 732103, India

Referanslar

Benzer Belgeler

Bünyesinde diğer tarikatlara nazaran daha fazla sembolizm unsuru barındıran Mevlevilik ve Bektaşilik gibi tarikatlar, derviş çeyizi ve tarikat eşyası ile ilgili sembolik bir

Abstract A real-valued triplet of scalar fields as a source gives rise to a metric which tilts the scalar, not the light cone, in 2+1 dimensions.. The topological metric is

 In Venezuela, Cyclospora cayetanensis has been linked to having no toilet in the home, the home being a hut, and having contact with feces soil.  Children aged 6-15 had the

Hastanemizin Pediatri kliniklerine Ocak 2004 ile Ocak 2005 tarihleri aras›nda zehirlenme tan›s›yla yat›r›lan 60 hasta, yafl, cinsiyet, zehirlenme nedeni, toksik maddeyi alma

Aydın yılda 6 kez habersiz ürün denetimi ve 1 kere de sistem denetimi yaptığı, titiz Türkiye Hazır Beton Birliği, kaliteli beton Turkish Ready Mixed Concrete

CONSTRUCTION OF THE NEW MATRIX We have decided to construct a well-defined rotation based only on two successive rotations of the contour curve.. We were inspired for such

In order to demystify the intricate language games and intriguing relationships in the play, the vocabulary provided by Game Theory proves to be helpful.. As Brams emphasizes,

In addition, there is good agreement between the exact theoretical results (obtained from (20)) and the simulation results, whereas the Gaussian approximation in (27)