PGP (EC 3.1.3.18) Polymorphism in the Düsseldorf Region
W. HUCKENBECK, P. FREUDENSTEIN, W. BONTE, J.
BARZInstitute of Forensic Medicine, Heinrich-Hcinc-University, Düsseldorf, FRG
DÜSSELDORF BÖLGESİNDE PGP POL1MORFlzMİ
Özet
Akrabalık ilişkileri bulunmayan ve Düsseldorf bölgesinde yaşayan 1582 Alman vatandaşının kanı
fosfoglikolat fosfataz (PGP) polimorfizmi açısından incelendi. 688 anne-çocuk çiftinin PGP fenotip dağılımı
belirlendi. Bu amaçla nişasta jel elektroforezi yönteminden yararlanıldı. PGP'nin gösterdiği PGP!, PGPı ve PGp3 allelleri nedeniyle 6 fenolipi bulunmaktadır. PGpSumatra ile tanımlanan ender alleli vePGpO sessiz alleli bulunur. Bulgulan sunulan çalışmada gözlenen fenotiplerin Hardy-Weinberg yasasına uyduğu saptandı. Gen
frekanslan ise PGp! .8606, PGPı .0964 ve PGp3 .0424 olarak hesaplandı. PGP kalıtımın otozomal kodominant şekilde olduğu kanıtlanan bu çalışmada, PGp3 frekansının Düsseldorf bölgesinde daha düşük bulunduğunu bildiren önceki araşıırmalan destekleyen sonuçlar elde edilemedi.
Summary
Blood samples from 1582 unrelated Gennan individuals in the Düsseldorf area were studied for
phosphoglycolate phosphatase (PGP) polymorphism. The number of the observed phenotypes did not diverge from the expected values (Hardy-Weinberg). The gene frequencies were calculated as:
PGP! .8606, PGP2 .0964, PGp3 .0424
The assumed autosomal codominant mode of inheritance was confirmed by the analysis of 688 mother-child data, incJuding 501 "criticaı" mother child pairs.
The assumption that there is a lower PGp3 frequency in the Düsseldorf area could not be confirmed. Several other PGP studies are discussed and compared.
Kcy words: Phosphoglycolate phosphatase - Polymorphism - Genefrequencies
INTRODUCTION
Phosphoglyeolate phosphatase (pGP) was first described
i
n plant tissues (1, 2).
In 1977 Badwey
(3)
described the enzyme aetivity in human crythroeytes.
it
remains
eoneeivab
l
e that PGP aetivity plays some part in the regulation
of
oxygen transfer to
and from haemoglobin (4,5). There is no evidenee to suggest
t
ha
t
different
eleetrophoretie variants of PGP are assoeiated with diffcrent levels of aetiv
it
y b
u
t
day-to-day variation in PGP aetivity even in the same individual has
been
reported (6).
140
w.
HUCKENBECK, P. FREUDENSTEIN, W. BONTE, J. BARZTh
e
r
esults
of
severa
l authors
ind
i
cate the
l
ocalizatio
n
of the gene fo
r
h
uman PGP
on th
e chromoso
me 16
(7-
9).
Six
phe
n
o
typ
es -
du
e
to
three ail
eles
PGP
1, PG
P
2
and PGP3- can be separated by
electrophores
i
s.
A
rarea1l
ele
was described as PGpSumatra
(10).
Weber
(ll)
repofred
ab
out
a "s
i
lent" alle
l
e
PGP
o.
Close linkage betwccn PGP
and
th
e
marker
s
ABO,
acP,
ADA, PGM1, PGM3, G
L
O
and HLA
c
ou
ld
be rul
ed
out. Clo
se linkage
to other markers
could
not
be
proved
(12).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Blood samples of
1582
unrelated and apparently healthy Germans living İn the Düsseldorf area wereinvestigatcd. 688 mothcr ehild rairs were aııalysed.
The PGP phenotypes were demonstratcd hy means of starch gel elcetrophoresis. The method wes deserihed by Barker and Hopkinson (13) and Marıin et al (14).
3-1
2-1
3-2
2
3-2
3
RESULTS
3-2
2
2
3
-2
3-2
Figurc L Isozyme patterns of PGP arter starch gel clcctrophoresis.F
igure
1
shows the
zymogram
of phosphog
l
yco
l
a
t
e
p
h
o
s
p
h
atase
ar
t
er starch gel
elec
t
rophoresis.
The
patte
rn
s see
m
to
be
m
ore
indisıinctth
an zymograms
o
f
o
t
her
enzymcs
-
similar
t
o
the
isozy
me
patterns o
f
GP
T
arter
s
tarch
ge
l
electro
pho
r
esi
s
.
However,
a
reliable
determ
i
natio
n
i
s
poss
ib
l
e.
Table
1
s
h
ows
the dist
ri
bution of phenotypes
in
ou
r s
tud
y.
Wc found a
good
agrcemcn
t
betwccn
the
observe
d a
nd
expected values
acc
ording
to
the
lI
ardy-Weinberg
law.
expected we did no
t
find any
moth
cr-chil
d
ex
clu
sio
n.
This
study
in
cludes
502
"criticaı"mother
-chil
d
pairs.
In Table 3
we
combined this studyand the
study
of llenke et al
(15).
Now the
combined studies on POP
polymorphi
sm
in Düsseldorf
i
nclude 2
1
45
individuals.
I
n
Tablc 4
we
combined 9 studies on
P
OP po
l
ymorphism
in Germany. The combined
studies include
10524 i
ndividuals
and
show
t
he distribution of
ph
enotypes
in
Germany.
There
is
a
good agreement between observed and expected
vaıues.In
Table 5 we
listed
all publishe
d
studies
on
POP polymorphism.There is
more
agreement in
t
he gene freq
u
ences between
the
larger than in
the s
ma
ller s
tud
ies.
Not
hsred
are
t
he
studies
of Caeiro and Varela (16) and
Amorin et al
(17).
DISCUSS
I
ON
Though
the
POP t
yping
by
means
o
f
starch gel
electrophoresis
may
not
have
been
optima
l there
a
r
e
no
difficulties for a proficient
examine
r
to di
stinguish
th
e
different
phenotypes. Bu
t it
İ:,;absolutely
nece
ssary
to
use a wellknown
POp
l-3
as
control.
Tablc 1. Phcnotype and gene frequencies of PGP in the Düsseldorf population
observed expectcd Phenolype n % n % PGl'! lln 74.08 1171.7 74.07 PGl' 2·) 261 16.50 262.5 16.59 l'GP 2 18 1.14 14.7 .93 PGP 3·2 8 .51 13.1 .83 PGP 3·1 LLS 7.46 117.0 7.40 PGP 3 5 .32 2.9 .18 Total 1582 1oo.oı 1581.9 100.00 Gene frequencics: pGpı .8606 pGP2 .0964 PGP3.0424
142 W. HUCKEN13ECK, P. fREUDENSTEIN, W. 130NTE, J. BARZ
When adding the
last nine
studies
of
Tablc S data
of
LOS24 exa
m
ine
d
i
n
dividuals
have
been published
in Germany. Beeause
of its AV
ACH
-value
(more than 1
2
'lo)
PGP
is
a uscful marker
in
paternity
testing
.
Our
in
vestigation
of 688 mother
-eh
ild
pai
r
s
agrees with
the data reported by other authors (Table S).
Thus
om results confirm
the
for
mal
h
ypoth
es
i
s,
tha
t
PGP
p
oly
morph
ism is eontrolled by three codominant alle
les at
an
au
tosoma
ll
oc
us.
T
he
analysis
of
th
e
"cri
ticai"
mo
t
h
e
r-eh
ü
d
pairs
did not
s
how
any
dev
iation trom
Mendelian pro
po
rtio
ns-sueh
a
s
the oth
e
r
hs
t
ed
studies
did
(Tabıe S).
Only
in
one ease a "silent" allele
was
fou
nd
(l
l
).
Mother 2-1 2 3-2 3-1 3
Table 2. PGP phcnotypes in 688 mother-child pairs in Düsseldorf
1 431 50 27 2-1 44 57 10 ı 5 Child 2 3-2 6 3 2 3-1 16 2 5 28 i 3 n 491 LLS 10 6 62 i
H
enke
et
al (IS)
reported
about a low frequency ofPGP3
in Düsseldorf,
signifieantly
lower than
in
Bonn
(1
8).
We eannQt
s
uppo
rt
this suggestion. The PGP3 frequency
re
ported
by Brink et
al (18)
i
s
hig
h
-poss
ib
l
y
due
tothe small
num
ber
of
inve
s
tigated
eas
es
-b
ut
the PGP
frcquencies
in
Dü
sseld
orf are vcry
s
imilar
to
those
in
other
counti
es
of
Germa
ny
(Tab
I
e
1,3,4,S).
Table 3. Combined phenotype and gene frequencies of PGP in the Düsseldorf population (Henkc, Basler and Baur (15) / this study)
n % l'henotype expcctcd PGpı 1582 1579.23 73.75 PGP 2-1 374 375.82 17.44 PGP 2 26 22.36 1.21 PGP 3-2 12 17.46 .56 PGP 3-1 143 146.73 6.67 PGP 3 8 3.41 .37 - _.
__
.. -ıota! 2145 2145.00 100.00 Gene frcqucncies: PGpı .8580 PGP2.1020 PGP3.0400 expcctcd 73.62 17.52 1.04 .81 6.84 .16 99.99Phenolypf' PGpı PGP 2·1 FGP 2 PGP 3·2 PGP 3·1 PGP 3 total 7717 1877 128 10524 Gene freguencics: PGPl
Counıry Refcren ces
Greal Britiiii (U)
Bulgaria (19) Hungaria (20) Swiızcrland (21) Soıııhem Germany (17) Schlcswiı;. (22) Münstcrland, (Zı) NRW,FEC (ll) Düsseldorf, FRG (15.24) Bonn, FRG (18) Berlin (2'i) Berlin (11) Schleswi)C. (26)
Düsseldori this study
cxpected 7694.98 73.33 1906.00 17.84 118.03 1.23 86.94 702.03 6.SJ 16.01 .l _ ..
__
. _ -10523.90 100.02 .8551 PGP2.1059 PG!,3.0039 studies on !_".'ivınorphism n PGPl PGP 2 656 .129 800 .1038 942 .885 .089 900 .8889 .0889 544 .870 .100 1101 .1109 369 .106 5000 .1040 563 .851 .118 176 .8233 .1228 429 .R59 .106 353 .106 960 .1177 1582 .ilGlX) .0964 expected 73.12 18.11 !.il .83 6.67 .15 100.00 PGP 3 .045 .0250 .027 .0222 .030 .0249 .027 .0422 .031 .0539 .035 .0368 .0412 .0424will be communicated Haemogenelics, 19·21 Ocl. in New Orleans, USA.
REFERENCES
P. fREUDENSTElN,
of the International
Richardson, K.E., Tolbert, 1\.E. (1960) 1. Bio/. Chem., 236, 1285-1290. 2 Randall, D.D., Tolbcrt, N.E., Gremel, D. (1971) Planı. Physio/., 48, 480-487. '1 Badwcy. J.A. (1977) 1. Bio/. ChrIn, 252, 24412441.
,'j. (1976) Biochem. Bio!,hys Liebowitz, J. (1970) , V.S., Hopkinson, D.A. (198
Van Cong, N., Finaz,
139. Jeremiah, S.J., Barker. M., Carritt, B., Buckıoıı, Genel.,45,121-127. Ch., de Grouchy, J., D.A., Robson, KB.,
Hum. Genel. Lond.,
:ı Gal, A., Zerres, K., Recders, S.'1., WalJlıer, R., Hogenkamp, T., Sehmidt, W., Uıllıa"" S., Ü'-'V!(:s,
K.E., Propping, P. (1986) Postcr-Session, 7./nlernaıional Congress of Human Geneıies, Berlin.
10 Henke, J., Schweitzer, IL, Saehs, V. (1985) Hum. Genel., 70, 86.
11 Weber, W. (1988) Advances in Forensİe Haemogeneıies 2, (Mayr, W.K,cd), Springer Verlag, Berlin, I-Ieidelbcrg, New York.
12 Siebcrt, G., Amorim, A., Kömpf, J. (1980) Hum. Genel., 53,421-423.
13 Barker, R.F., I1opkinson, DA (1978) Ann. Hum. Genel., 42, 143-151. 14 Martin, W., Weisc, W., Himmelsbaeh, W. (1981) Arztl. Lab., 183-185. 15 Henke, J., Basler, Vf., Baur, M:P. (1983) Forensie Sei. In!., 22, 137-142.
20
Varela, T.A. ( 1 9 8 2 ) 1 0 0 .
A., Sicbcrt, G., Ritter, I, Baur, M.P., Rittner, L, Nankova, V., POPV"Sq!cv, Kosa, F., Földes, V. (I PJlughaupt, R., Büilcı, lbemogcl1cties, 293-296, Bem. J., Pribilla, O. (1982) Hum. Genel., 53, 419. 59, 386-388. A. (1982) Krim. Fareyıs. Wİss., 55/56, 70-72. f nlernalİonal Congress.
23 Christoph, LU., Bnnkmann, B. (1984) Z. Reehlsmed., 91,215-223. 24 Basler, M., Henke, J., Baur, M.P. (1983) Beilr. GerichıL. Med., 41, 165-171. 25 Radam, G., Straueh, H. (1982) Dısch. Gesundheitswes., 37, 524-525. 26 Christiansen, R, Sachs, V. (1981) Forensie Sei./nı., 18, 263.
Rcprints req'H;si
Dr. W. Huekenbcck Institute of Moorensstra&: 4000 Düsseldorf