A.
tl.
Vet. Fak. Derg. 40 (4): 352-562 lQ93THE PREVALENCE OF ASCARIASIS IN STRAY DOGS
IN ANKARA
Ahınet Doğanay
1Semih Öge
2Anka.ra sokak köpeklerinde
ascariasis'in
yayı1ışı
Özet:
Ankara sokak köpeklerinde görülen askarit türlerinin )'Qyılışını saptamak amacıyla182
köpeğin dışkı ve otopsi bakm yapıldı. Otopsi bakıla-rında126
(%
69.23)
kiipekte askarit enfeksiyonu tespit edildi. Bakısı yapılan köpeklerin95 (% 52.19)
inde Toxascaris leonina'ya,40 (% 21.97)
ındaToxocara canis'e,
1 (% 0.54)
inde de Toxocara cati'yc rastlandı.Dışkı bakılarında ise ancak
95
(%
52,19)
köpekte askarit enfeksiyonu saptandı. Buyö'ntemle köpeklerin62
(%
34.06)
sinde T. leonina,32
(%
17.58)
sinde T. canis
ve 1
(%
0.54)
inde de T. cati yumurtası tespit edildi . .t!ynca bir köpeğin dışkı bakısuıda Ascaris lumbricoides yumurlası saptandı. Ancak otopside parazile rastlanılmadı.Summary:
This stu& was carried out to determine thi' prevalence of ascarid species in stray dogs in Ankara. Detırminatiim of the prevalence of in-fections was based on both faecal examination and autopsy. Of Ihr!182
stray dogs autopsied126 (69.23
%)
wm found to be infected wiı/ı di;fferent ascarid species consisting of Toxascaris lconina(52.19
%),
Toxocara wnis(21.97
%)
and Toxocara cati
(O. 54
%).
Whereas,
95 (52.19 %)
of the182
faecal samples examined by flota-tion technique were posWve for ascarid eggs. Ascaris luınhricoides eggs were observed in faecal examination of one dog, but adult parasites were not found at autopsy.Introduction
Ascariasis is one of the comınon
helminth
diseascs of dogs in
many parts of the world (1, 2, 5, 6, 23, 32). Previous studies indicate
1 Doç. Dr., A.Ü. Vcteriner Fakültesi, Helmintoloji Bilim Dalı, Ankara.
.\SCARIASIS li\" STR..\Y T)(.l{;S
that ascarid species, especiaIly
Toxascaris
{coııiwı
andToxocara caııis
are also very common helminths of dogs in Turkey (7,
ıo,
i7, LS, 25, 29). In addition to their weIl kn.own veterin.ary importance some as-carid species such asT. canis
andT. cati
are alsa the most prevaIellt causes of visceral larva migran.s in man. Therefore the prevaIcnce of ascarid speeies of dogs has both veterinary and public health intnest(IL,
26, 33).
Nowadays, kecping of dogs as pcts is becoming more popular in Turkey. Further, the re İs a large number of stra)' dogs. EspcciaIIy, the incidence of infeetion is highest in thesc animaIs (l, 8, 9, 2 i). The pur-pose of this study was to determine a more recent prevaknce of ascarid species in these animals in Ankara based on records of both faecal exa-minations and autopsy findings.
Materials and Methods
One hundred eigh ty- two stra y dogs of differen t ages and scxes we-re examined in this study. Dogs were supplied as dead by dog-shootcrs of the Statc Veterinary Department during tiwir campaing on dest-mction of stra y dogs in Ankara. The age (u nder i year and over 1 year) and sex of each animals wc re recorded.
Faccal sampIes were takcn from rectum of uogs and cxaminations were performed by the use of saturated salt (;\aCI) flotation tcchnique. Ascarid eggs foupd by flotatiOlı werc idcıı.tified using rnorphological cri tl~ria (I I, 14) .
At neeropsy, the gastro-intestinal tracı \Vas cxamincd for
asca-rids. Recovered worms were fi:-:cd in 5
%
formalin and were idcntifi-ed mieroscopicaIIy. Idcntification was based all. tlıe dcscriptiop of Durm (II), Georgi ct aL. (14), Sprent and Barrct (28). Especially, the presence or absence of a ventricuIus intercalatcd between the csophagus and intestine was important criterian in the identification of immature, adultT. leo1lina
andTo
canis
(Figure ILResults
Of the 182 stray dogs autopsied 126 (69.21 ~<») were found to be infectcd witlı a total of three ascarid spccies. The ıno~t frcquer'dy ob-servcd ascarid species was
Tox(JScaris leonina
wi th perccn tage of 52.19.Toxocara canis
andToxocara cali
were found ip. 21.97%
and0.54-
%
.\HMET /)0(;:\:'\.\1' - SEMİH ÖGE
Fİgun~ L
J
unctİon Letwecn esophagus and İntestİnc in Toxocara canİs (A) (lnu Toxasearİs leonİna (H).Tahle 1. Prı~\alenee ııl' asearİı! spceİf~s f"und by faccal flotation and autopsy of dogs.
I
J~ faeecs cxaminatİon' .' At. autop"y ~o. of dogsi
l\o. of dogs Ascarİd speeİesi
İnff~eted ().() İnfcctcd ~:)--_._-._---:--._-~.---
---,---_ .._. ----_.-.._--
---Toxascarıs \collina 62 .H. 06i
9552.19
Toxocara caııis 32 17.58 40 2ı.
97 Toxocara catİ i O. :>4, i ] O. 54 Ascari" lumhrİeoidcs 1 0.54ı
---_._._-_ .._-'---~---'---' TIı<.' iııfection ratc of female c10gs (72.72%)
\Vas highcr than that of males (65.95%).
Bu t there wcre 110 significant c1ifferenccs in prcva-lence ratcs bctwcen age groups (under i year ancl over 1 year). The clistribu tion of ascaricl specics in relation to age arı.cl sex are shown in Tabk2
and 3, i"espeetively. Contrary tO the prC\.alencc ofT. teonina,
T. canis
ilı.fcctioJls \Vere found irı. young dogs morc frequently than n adults (Tabk 2). As shown in Table 2 polyinfections wcr ..~lcss caınınon than iııfcetiom with a sill.gle ascaricl specics.Asearid speci,>s
Tabıı' 2. B.dation of infectioJ) rate of ascarid specics to age nf dogs
Young dog (ıınder 1 )'T.) Adult <log(o\'C1' 1 yr.)
i
No. of dog"
ı
No. of dog~i
II II ;\io. of dngs , No. of dogsı
i:;)
i
examined infccted ,~xamirH.d inf"et"dT~ıconina --- --
58--1--18--
31031-124
---1--67--
--5~03-I
---
---
---1---1---_1_---
---I!~~nis
5~ __
II--~~-J-=~31
J_~24
II--~~--,~~~~i
T. eati 58 1 1.7~
i
ı~4, -1-l'~lconjna ~:-T~~ni;---I--
58--
---5-- -~
621-124---I----s--i-<ı.-
03,,, ,,,
e--Tahle 3. Helation of infeetioıı ratı' nf ascarid spceİcs to sex of dogs
~
..
t;;
...;g
ca.1 ;, :4 ;.. --: i ~F: tt:: ;::::....
::ı:: c ':'l t'1 -:\falc Fı~rnalcAsearid spccİcs No. nf dogs ~o. of dogs (ll No. of do gs'11NI). of dogs il
..0 /1)
. cxamincd İufccled i ~ . exaınİnclJ in fc.e1.cıl
---I
"
i
T. Jeonma 88 12 1.7.12.1
91, 1345.74-i
t~~:~t.
T.
,ani'=======
88
==== 15== 17~'-1==94===1
1== 15==ı~95-1
ı
T. catİ 88 -i
91, 1 1.0lıi
---.---
---
---
---1---1---
---I
Polytnfect.1 T.leonina+.T.canis __ ~_ 7 7.95 94I.
3 _ 3.19 Total 88 64 72.7294,
.
(i265.951
ASCARIASIS E\ STIU Y DOCS 557
The number
of worms eoIleeted per dog rangeel from
ito 90.
The mean worm bUl"den. of T. leonina, T. eanis and
T. eali \Vas 8.7,
6.3 and 5, respeetivcly
(Tabk
4).
On the other hand, 95 (52.19 %) of the 182 faeeal saınpIes
cxaıni-ned by flotation
teehniquc
were positİ\'c for ascarid eggs. The com
pa-rison of f1otatiolı anel au topsy findil'.~s arc summarized
in Tablc
i.
In addition
to the Toxoeara
(T. ca
iiis, T. eaıi) and Tox:asearis (T.
leonina) eggs, Ascaris lumhricoides eggs \\'ere observed
il'faccal samples
of one dog. But adult A. lıımhricoides \Vas not
fOllP,d at autopsy
iilthis animaL.
Discussion
In general,
results from this study show asearid patterns
eonsis-tent with those reported
by others (4, 7, 9, 18,22,29)
using autopsy
and faecal
cxamination
although
some differenees
were noted.
In the present study, 126 stray dogs autopsied
out of 182 (69.23
%) were found to be infected \vith asearid speeies. Also the infeetion
ratc was detected of 52.19
%
in faeeal examinations.
As shown in
Tab-le 5, this infeetion rates are higher than in the reports previously
men-tioned in Turkey
(4, 12, 16).
Of the as earid species deteeted at autopsy, T. leonina was found
most frequently
with a percentage
of 52.19. This result is similar to
those reported by Budak et aL. (4), Doğanay
(9), Mimioğ1u ct aL. (22),
Taşan (29) and Zeybek (331. Contrary
to findings of Güralp ct aL. (17),
Pamukçu
and Ertürk
(24) and Tınar et aL. (30). Whose reports
indi-eate that
T. canis infeetions
were found
most commonly
in dogs.
Generally,
the incidence of T eanis has becn a1so found
higher
than
that of T. leonina in other countrics
(2, G, 19, 20, 23, 31, 32). The
pre-valenee of T. (anis in this study is close to that reponed
in some of the
earlier
papcrs
in Turkey
(9, 21, 21, 29).
Toxocara cali was detected in one dog (0.54 %) in this study. This
asearid species has been also found in two dogs in Turkey by Pamukçu
and
Ertürk
(24.).
The prevaIenee
of T. canis infeetion in young dogs is known to
be mueh higher than in adult dogs (3, 8, 9, 13, 15). Toxocara carıis
in-fections were also found in young dogs (under 1 year) more frequenı1y
Tahlc 4. Severity of ,,"orm hurdens fouIld at autopsy of dOg6
;---,---i
Number of ,,"orms found!
T. leolıiIla T. canis T. eatii
Age group Sex of i_-;-;-_-=;--_...,, __ i_~~-:-_______ . Total of dogs do gs M.i
F. im.. M. F. tm. M.i
.F tm.---
---- ---
---
---
---
---
---Malc II 16 6 9 13 3 2 3 6:~ U'nder ] yr. ---- --:-- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- -,- -Female
,o
97 32 .1.9 67 16 - - i - 331--- --- --- --- ---1---
---1---
-1-
---0---1 --- Mal:-- ~16_ ~28 __ 23__ 32__ 37__ ~_-=-1-=- _=__
~ı,~
ver yr. ---- i1 -'--I_?I_~m_a_Ie_I-3-1
~.-~.-I~~-Iı~-
-~-!ı~-I-~-
-~-ı-~-
-=:-1:::
Total 829 251 5
",.
",.
::=g:
-,O.No. of worms per dog min-max (Average)
M:
MaleF:
FemaleIm:
1-90
lınmature
'Table 5. Prevalencc of ascarid specics f.)lınd ın dogı; ın Turkey incidence of ascarid specıcs Authors . Mcthod
ı
Total percent~g~ of ascarıasıs Oi iO T. Iccnina%
T. cal1is 0/ ıO T. catii
A. lumhricoid •.s oı OL /0 /0 autopsy faecal autopsy , faecal**
According to infected animals20
51,.16*•..
:r.0.32
_-~_i-
--i.
,.113.21
22.7
i
ı
4.10 -- - , 14.76 .-' - _ - I' 26 ----24 .i
16-
- --.
._-32.14."*
i
'
~~.22.1'.---
---ı
i
23,--:---="-
-=
;
,---- ---15. ISi
-
-
i
~~:~6
1--=---
---=---,
~1.97i
O.SI --- __ -i 17.58i
0.51 0.54 i 23.5 2838.88*
0.19
28.57
67
62
4267.86**
25
12.97
80
51.1538.75
23.33
52.19
H.06
9.334.5
28.57
Mimioğlıı et aL., (1959) Giiralp, (1957) Paınukçu and Ertiirk,(1961 )
Mı~rdiv•.nci, (1962) Ertürk and Tanzt~r,
(1973) aulopsy
I
Giiralp ct aL., (1977) aııtopsy Ta7an, (1982) autopsy Doğanay, (1983) autopsyI,
faccal Budak d_aL., (1986) autopsy ~ına.r etı ~l., (1989)I.
autopsy (,erçı, (1990) faccal Saygı et aL., (1990) autopsy-Zcyhek l't aL.,(1992) autopsy llasslinger ct aL., faecal (1993) autopsy Present aıı tlıors autopsy faccal
AH:MET J)()(;A\A Y - SEMİH ÜCE
than İn adults (over 1 year) in present study. But there \Yere no signi-ficant diffcrel'.ccs observccl if'. the overall incidence of ascariasis bet-ween age gmups. AIso, no signifieant differenees were observed in the prevalcnce rates in mak and female dogs. This results is in agree-ment with the reports of others (8, 23, 27).
It was İnterestiıı.g to notc that or.e dog showed
Ascaris lumbricoides
eggs in the facces, but not in autopsy. Alsa, the similar results had been reporred by Güralp (16) and Merdivenci (21) who accepted this ea-ses as a pseudoparasitism.
in conclusion, these results indieate that ascariasis is the most prevalcnt hclminth irofcction in dogs in Turkey, Therefore, these ani-mals may play a signifieant role as visceral lan'a migrans reservoirs in this country.
References
1. Abo-Shady, A.F. (1980). lntestinal helminthes among stray dogs in Mansoura city, Egypt.
J.
Egypt. Soe. ParasiL, 10:289-345.2. Aı'ene, F.O.I. (1984). Prevalence of toxocuriasis and echinococcosis among dogs in the iViger Delta.
J.
trop. Med. Hyg., 87:207-209. 3. Baker, D.G. and Strombeck, D.R. (i 985). J ntestinal parasitism indogs from Placer COll1ltry, California, aninıal control facility. Calif. Vet., 39:32-36.
4. Budak, S., Serınet,
ı.
ve Ünver, A. (1986). izmir ve civarındaki so-kak köpeklerinde askarid prevalansı. Türk. ParazİtoL. Derg., 9:57-65. 5. C08ta, J.O., Galvin, T.J., BelI, R.R. and Smith, J.P. (1971). Surve)'of helminth parasites of dogs from Brazos countr)', THus. S. West. Vet., 24.: 305--30ô.
6. Cowper, S.G. (1978). llelminth parasites of dogs and cats and toxop-lasmosis antibodies in cats in Swansea, South Wales. Ann. trop. Med.
Parasit., 72: 455-459.
7. Çerçi, H. (1990). A nkara ili Elmadağ ilçesi Kırsal Yöre Köpeklerin-de Görülen MiKöpeklerin-de-Bağırsak Helmintlerinin Yayılışı ve insan Sağlığı
Yönünden Onemi. A.Ü. Sağlık Bilim. Ens. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ankara.
8. Chıejma, S.N. and Ekwe, T.O. (1986). Canine toxocariasis and the associated environmental conıamination of urban areas in Eastern
Nigeria.
Vet. Parasito!., 22:157-161.:\SCAR tASIS IX STRA Y DOCS 561 9. Doğanay, A. (1983). Ankara köpeklerinde görülen helmint türleri,
bunların y(i)'ılışı ve halk sağlığı yönünden önemi. A.Ü. Vet. Fak. Derg.
30 :550-56
ı.
10. Doğanay, A. (1992). Türkiye'de kedi ve köpeklerde görülen parazitler.
A.Ü. Vet. Fak. Derg., 39: 336-348.
ll. Dunn, A.M. (1978). Veterinary Helmintology. 2 nd ed., William Hci-nemann Medical nooks Ltd., London.
12. Ertürk, E. ve Tanzer, F. (1973). 1961-1972 yılları arasında Ankara ve yiiresinde köpeklerde göriilen hastalık olaylarına kısa bir bakış.
A.Ü.
Vet. Fak. Derg., 20: 277-280.
13. Furth, M., Hoıda, G. and El-on, J. (1990). Prevalence of helminths in dogs in the Hadcra Districı of Israel. ISI' .
.T.
Med. Sei., 26: 636-637.11,. Georgı, J.R. and Theodoridcs, V.J. (1980). Parasitology for Vete-rinarians. 3rd ed. W.B. Saunders Company, Plıiladelphia.
15. Gross, E.M., Zcitan, R. and Vıola, T. (1984). Toxocara canis infee-tion in Jogs in Bearsheba, Israel.
J.
Helmintlı., 58: ]39-141. 16. Güralp, N. (1957). Köpek ve kedi askaritlerinin tedaı.isinde Piperazineadipate'la yaptığımız deneyler ve aldığımız sonuçlar. A.Ü. Vet. Fak. Derg., 4: 42-51.
17. Güralp, N., Dinçer,
Ş.,
Kemer, R., Cantory, R. ve Taşan, E. (1977).Elazığ yöresi köpeklerinde görülen gastro-intestinal helmint türleriyle bunların yaydış oranı ve halk sağlığı yönünden önemleri. A.Ü. Vet. Fak. Derg., 24: 21.1-21.9.
18. Hasslinger, M.A., Buı'gu, A., EI-Seify, M.A. und EI-Assaly, T. (1993)
Vergleiehende Untf'Tsuclıımgelı zum Helminthensıatus bei streunenden Hımden und Sein/! Bedeutung für dı~c mensehliehe Gesıındheit. Tier-arztl. Umsch., 1.8: 596-606.
19. Kamiya, H., Seki, N., Tada, Y. and Kamiya, M. (1975). Some rare
helmintiıs from stray dogs of Sapporo.
J
ap ..T.
vet. Res., 23: 25-32. 20. Lillis, W.G. (1967). Helmiııılı surt!ey of dogs and cats ı~n NewJer-se)' .
.r.
Parasit., 53:1082-1081.21. Merdivenci, A. (1962). htanbıırda larva migrans rezervuarları -üze-rinde araştırmalar. Türk vet. Hekim. Dem. Derg., 32:382-398. 22. Min~ioğlu, M., Giiralp, N. ve Sayın,
:F.
(1959). Ankara köpeklerindegörülen parazit türleri H bunların yayılış nisbeti. A.Ü. Vet. Fak.
562 AInıET DOGANA Y - SEM1H ÖGE
23. Ng,
B.K.Y. and Kelly, J.D.(1975).
Arthropozoonotic helminthiasis in Australasia: Part 3: Studies on the prevalence and pııblic health implicatimıs of helminth parasites of dogs and cats in urban environ-ments. Int ..T.
Zoon.,2: 76-91.
2.1..
Pamukçu,M.
ve Erlürk, E.(1961). 1933-1960
yılları arasında Anka-ra ve yöresinde köpeklerde görülen hastalıklara toplu bir bakış. A.Ü.Vet. Fak. Derg., 8: 323-346.
25.
Saygı,G.,
Özçelik, S. ve Temizkan,N. t 1990).
Sivas sokak köpeklerinin ince bağırsaklarında bulduğumuz helmintler. Türk. Parazitol. Derg.,14: 81-93.
26.
Schanlz,P.M. (1991).
Parasitic zoonoses in perspective. Int.J.
Para-sit.,21 :161-170.
27.
Shanta, C.S., Wan, S.P., Song, C.Y. and Kwong, K.H.(1977).
A sur-vey of the endo-and ecto-parasites of dogs in and around Jpoh, WestMalaysia,
MaL. vet. J., 6:95-110.
28.
Sprent, J.F.A. and Banetı,M.G. (1961).
J.arge roundworms of dogs and cats : Differentiation of Toxocara canis and Toxascaris leonina.Aust. vet.
J.
40:166-171.
29.
Taşan,E. (1982).
Elazığ Kırsal Yöre Köpeklerinde Helmintlerin Yayılış ve Insan Sağlığı Yönünden Önemi. Fırat Üniv. Vet. Fak. Doçentlik Tezi, Elazığ.30. Tınar, !l., Coşkun, Ş.Z., Doğan, H., Demir, S., Akyol, ç.V. ve Aydın, L.
(1989).
Bursa yöresi köpeklerinde görülen helmint türleri ı'e bunların yayılışı. Türk. IJarazito!. Derg.,13: 113--120.
31.
Turner, T.(1977).
A survey of patent nematode infestations in dogs.Vet. Ree., 2: 284-285.
32.
Vanparijs,O.,
Hermans, L. and Flaes, L.(1991).
Helminth and pro-tozoan parasites in dogs and mts in Belgium. Vet. ParasitoL., 38:67-73.
33.
Woodruff, A.W.(1984).
Toxocariasis. Med. Int.,2:206-208.
34. Zeybek, H., Tatar, N.~'C Tokay, A. (1992). An/cara y;jresi kırsal alan
köpeklerinde görülen parazit/erve bunların yayılışı. Etlik Vet. Mik.