• Sonuç bulunamadı

Polynomial Helices in the n-Dimensional Semi-Euclidean Space with Index Two

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Polynomial Helices in the n-Dimensional Semi-Euclidean Space with Index Two"

Copied!
12
0
0

Yükleniyor.... (view fulltext now)

Tam metin

(1)

Available at: http://www.pmf.ni.ac.rs/filomat

Polynomial Helices in the n-Dimensional Semi-Euclidean Space with

Index Two

Hasan Altınbas¸a, B ¨ulent Altunkayab, Levent Kulaa

aKırs¸ehir Ahi Evran University, The Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Department of Mathematics, Kırs¸ehir, Turkey bKırs¸ehir Ahi Evran University, Faculty of Education, Department of Mathematics, Kırs¸ehir, Turkey

Abstract. In this article, we investigate polynomial helices in the n-dimensional semi-Euclidean space with index two for n ≥ 4. We obtain some families of spacelike and timelike polynomial helices. These helices have spacelike or timelike or null axes. After that, we give some examples of the spacelike and the timelike polynomial helices in the n-dimensional semi-Euclidean space with index two for n= 4, 5 and 6.

1. Introduction

Helices have been one of the most fruitful subject for the differential geometry since it has many applications in the other branches of science. For instance, in biology, in simulation of kinematic motion, in the design of highways, in engineering and so on [1, 2].

The notion of helix is stated in 3-dimensional Euclidean space by M. A. Lancret in 1802. Helix is a curve whose tangent vector field make a constant angle with a fixed direction called the axis of the helix. In 1845, B. de Saint Venant gave the necessary and sufficient condition of a curve to be a general helix. Namely, a curve is a general helix if and only if the ratio of the curvature to the torsion is constant [13]. In Literature, there are several characterizations for helices in the Euclidean 3-space [5, 12].

In [11], ¨Ozdamar and Hacısaliho ˘glu defined harmonic curvature functions in the n-dimensional Eu-clidean space and used them to extend the concept of the helix from 3-dimensional EuEu-clidean space to n-dimensional Euclidean space for n> 3. Since then, the characterization of helices has been studied in many ambiant spaces. For example, in n-dimensional Euclidean space [2, 3], in 3-dimensional Lorentzian space forms, which are de Sitter and anti de Sitter space [8], in Galilean space [4, 9], in Lie group [17], in n-dimensional Minkowski space [1, 15, 16].

Semi-Euclidean geometry has been an active research area in general relativity and mathematics, after Einstein’s formulation of general relativitiy as a theory of space, time and gravitation in the semi-Euclidean space [14]. As far as we know, there is little information available in literature about helices in the semi-Euclidean space with index two. The main goal of this article is to obtain families of non-null polynomial helices depend on its casual character in the semi-Euclidean space with index two. In addition, we consider casual character of the axis of the helix.

2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. 53A35; 53C50.

Keywords. Spacelike polynomial helix, timelike polynomial helix. Received: 25 February 2020; Accepted: 15 May 2020

Communicated by Ljubica Velimirovi´c

Email addresses: hasan.altinbas@ahievran.edu.tr (Hasan Altınbas¸), bulent.altunkaya@ahievran.edu.tr (B ¨ulent Altunkaya), lkula@ahievran.edu.tr(Levent Kula)

(2)

The remainder of this article is organized as follows. First, we give basic information about a non-degenerate curve of local differential geometry in the n-dimensional semi-Euclidean space with index two. After, we give some families of the spacelike and the timelike polynomial helices in the n-dimensional semi-Euclidean space with index two. This part was adopted from Minkowski spacetime in [1]. Finally, give some examples in the n-dimensional semi-Euclidean space with index two for n= 4, 5 and 6.

2. Preliminary

In this section, we give the basic theory of non-degenerate curves of local differential geometry in the n-dimensional semi Euclidean space with index two. For more details and background about this space, see [10].

Let {e1, e2, . . . , en} be the standard orthonormal basis of real vector space Rnand the vector space Rnendowed

with the scalar product,

1 x, y = −x1y1−x2y2+ n

X

i=3

xiyi,

for all x = (x1, x2, . . . , xn), y = (y1, y2, . . . , yn) ∈ Rn. The couple Rn, 1 (, ) is called n-dimensional semi-Euclidean space with index two, which is denoted by En

2. Recall that a vector v ∈ R

nis called spacelike

if 1 (v, v) > 0, timelike if 1 (v, v) < 0 and null (lightlike) if 1 (v, v) = 0. In addition, if the vector v = 0, then v is still called spacelike. The norm of a vector v ∈ Rnis defined by kvk= q

1 (v, v) . A curve in E n 2 is a

smooth mappingα : I → En2, where I is an open interval in R. A curve α : I → En2is called regular provided

α0

(t) , 0 for all t. The regular curve α : I → En2 is said to be spacelike or timelike if its velocity vectorα 0

(t) is a spacelike or a timelike vector at any t ∈ I.

Let {V1, V2, . . . , Vn} be non-null Frenet frame along a non-null arbitrary curveα in En2. Since {V1, V2, . . . , Vn}

is an orthonormal frame, then 1Vi, Vj = δi jεiwherebyεi∈ {−1, 1} for i, j = 1, 2, . . . , n. Now, we can give

Frenet-Serret formulas according to the causal character of the curveα. It means that if ε1= 1 and ε1= −1,

thenα (t) is the spacelike and timelike curve in En

2, respectively. Then, the Frenet equations are as follows,

                       V10 V20 V30 ... V0n−1 V0 n                        =                        0 νε2κ1 0 · · · 0 0 −νε1κ1 0 νε3κ2 · · · 0 0 0 −νε2κ2 0 · · · 0 0 ... ... ... ··· ... ... 0 0 0 · · · 0 −νεn−1κn−1 0 0 0 · · · −νεnκn−1 0                                               V1 V2 V3 ... Vn−1 Vn                        where V1 = α 0 kα0k, ν = kα 0

(t)k andκithe ith curvatures of the curveα for 1 ≤ i ≤ n − 1 [6]. In this work, we

assume all curvaturesκiof the curveα are nowhere vanish. Such curves are called non-degenerate curve.

3. Spacelike Polynomial Helices in En

2

In this section, after giving the definition of a helix in En

2, we give families of polynomial spacelike

helices in En

2. For doing this, we have two cases where n is even or odd. In the case of n is even, there are

three subcases; n= 4, n = 6 and n ≥ 8. If n is odd there are also two subcases; n = 5 and n ≥ 7.

Definition 3.1. A regular curveβ : I ⊂ R → E31 parameterized by arc length is called a helix if and only if there exist a constant vector U ∈ E3

1with L(T(s), U) is a constant where T(s) is tangent vector of the curve β and L (, ) is

the Lorentzian metric. Any line parallel this direction U is called the axis of the curveβ [7]. Similar to the definition above, we define helix in En

(3)

Definition 3.2. A curveβ : I ⊂ R → En

2is called a helix if and only if there exist a nonzero constant vector U ∈ En2

with 1(V1, U) is a nonzero constant where V1is the tangent vector field of the curveβ. Any line parallel this direction

U is called the axis of the curveβ. 3.1. Spacelike polynomial helices in En

2when n is even

In this subsection, we give families of spacelike polynomial helices with spacelike, timelike or null axis for n is even.

Theorem 3.3. Let n= 4 and β : (1, d) ⊂ R → E4

2, d > 1, be a curve defined by β (t) =a1 2t 2,a2 3t 3, a 3t, a4 5t 5+a5 3t 3. If a21= 2b1b2, a22= 2b1b3, a3 = b1, a4 = b3, a5 = b2,

with 1 ≤ j ≤ 3, bj∈ R+, b3+ b2> b1thenβ is a spacelike polynomial helix with the spacelike axis U = (0, 0, 1, −1).

Proof. From the straightforward calculations, we have 1 β0(t), β0(t)= b3t4+ b2t2−b1 2 , V1(t)= 1 b3t4+ b2t2−b1  a1t, a2t2, b1, b3t4+ b2t2 , 1(V1(t), U) = −1.

Therefore,β is a spacelike polynomial helix.

Example 3.4. If we choose b1= 1, b2= b3= 2 in Theorem 3.3, then we have the spacelike polynomial helix

β (t) = t2,2t 3 3 , t, 2t5 5 + 2t3 3 !

with the spacelike axis U= (0, 0, 1, −1) and the tangent vector

V1(t)= 1 2t4+ 2t2− 1  2t, 2t2, 1, 2t4+ 2t2 . Also, 1(V1(t), U) = −1.

Theorem 3.5. Let n= 6 and β : (1, d) ⊂ R → E62, d > 1, be a curve defined by β (t) =a1 2t 2,a2 3t 3, a 3t,a4 4t 4,a5 5t 5,a6 7t 7+a7 5t 5. If a2 1= 2b1b2, a22= 2b1b3−b22, a3= b1, a24= 2b2b3− 2b1b4, a25= 2b2b4, a6= b4, a7= b3,

(4)

with 1 ≤ j ≤ 4, bj∈ R+, 4

P

j=2bj> b1; 2b1b3> b 2

2; b2b3> b1b4, thenβ is a spacelike polynomial helix with the axis

U= 0,b2

a2, 1, 0, 0, −1

!

and the tangent vector V1(t)= 1 −b1+ b2t2+ b 3t4+ b4t6  a1t, a2t2, a3, a4t3, a5t4, a6t6+ a7t4 .

Proof. We omit the proof since it is analogous to the proof of the Theorem 3.3. Theorem 3.6. Assume n ≥8 is an even number,

a21= 2b1b2, a22= 2b1b3−b22> 0, a3= b1, a2n−1= 2bn−2 2 bn+22 , an= bn+22 , an+1= b n 2, a22k+1= b2k+1− 2b1b2k+1+ 2 k X j=2 bjb2k− j+2> 0 for 2 ≤ k ≤ n − 42 and a22l= −2b1b2l+ 2 l X j=2 bjb2l− j+1> 0 for 2 ≤ l ≤n − 22 such that 1 ≤ j ≤n+22 , bj∈ R+, bn+4 2 = bn+62 = · · · = bn−2= 0 and n+2 2 P

j=2bj> b1. Then, the curve β : I → E n 2defined by β (t) =a1 2t 2,a2 3t 3, a 3t,a4 4t 4,a5 5t 5, . . . , an−1 n − 1t n−1, an n+ 1t n+1+ an+1 n − 1t n−1

is a spacelike polynomial helix with axis U where

U= b2 a2 e2+ e3− n−2 2 X m=3 bm a2m−1 e2m−1−en, I= (1, d) ⊂ R and d > 1.

Proof. By making calculations, we have V1(t)= 1 β0(t)  a1t, a2t2, a3, a4t3, a5t4, . . . , an−1tn−2, antn+ an+1tn−2  = 1 β0(t)  a1t, a2t2, b1, a4t3, a5t4, . . . , an−1tn−2, bn+2 2 t n+ bn 2t n−2 . Morever, we have 1 β0(t), β0 (t)=          −b1+ n+2 2 X j=2 bjt2(j−1)          2 . So, 1 β0 (t), β0

(t)> 0. In that case β is a spacelike polynomial curve with 1(V1(t), U) = −1.

(5)

As a result of Theorem 3.6, we have the following corollary. Corollary 3.7. It is easily seen that,

If 2a 2 2−b 2 2 a2 2 + n−2 2 X m=3 b2 m a2 2m−1

> 0, then the axis U is a spacelike vector,

If 2a 2 2−b 2 2 a2 2 + n−2 2 X m=3 b2 m a2 2m−1

< 0, then the axis U is a timelike vector and If 2a 2 2−b22 a2 2 + n−2 2 X m=3 b2 m a2 2m−1

= 0, then the axis U is a null vector.

Similarly, from the Theorem 3.5, one easily see that the axis U is a spacelike, a timelike and a null vector if 2a2

2−b22 > 0, 2a22−b22< 0 and 2a22= b22, respectively.

Now, we give an example of a spacelike polynomial helix with the null axis for n= 6.

Example 3.8. If we choose b1= 1, b2= 2, b3= 3, b4 = 1 in Theorem 3.5, then we have the spacelike polynomial helix

β (t) = t2, √ 2 3 t 3, t, √ 5 2 √ 2t 4,2t5 5 , t7 7 + 3t5 5 !

with the null axis U=0,

2, 1, 0, 0, −1 and the tangent vector

V1(t)= 1 t6+ 3t4+ 2t2− 1  2t,√2 t2, 1, √ 10 t3, 2t4, t6+ 3t4 . Also, 1(V1(t), U) = −1.

Now, we give an example of a spacelike polynomial helix with the timelike axis for n= 6 Example 3.9. If we choose b1 = 2, b2 =

3, b3 = 2, b4 = 1 in Theorem 3.5, then we have the spacelike polynomial

helix β (t) =          4 √ 3 √ 2t 2,t3 3, t, s 2 √ 3 − 1 8 t 4, 4 √ 12 5 t 5,t7 7 + 2t5 5          with the timelike axis

U=0, √

3, 1, 0, 0, −1 and the tangent vector

V1(t)= 1 t6+ 2t4+ √ 3t2− 1 4 √ 12 t, t2, 1, q 4 √ 3 − 2 t3, 4 √ 12 t4, t6+ 2t4 ! . Also, 1(V1(t), U) = −1.

(6)

3.2. Spacelike polynomial helices in En

2when n is odd

In this subsection, we give families of spacelike polynomial helices with spacelike, timelike or null axis when n is odd.

Theorem 3.10. Let n= 5 and β : (1, d) ⊂ R → E5

2, d > 1, be a curve defined by β (t) =a1 2t 2,a2 3t 3, a 3t, a4 4t 4,a5 5t 5. If a2 1= 2b1b2, a 2 2= 2b1b3−b22, a3= b1, a24= 2b2b3, a5= b3,

with 1 ≤ j ≤ 3, bj∈ R+, b3+ b2> b1and b22< 2b1b3thenβ is a spacelike polynomial helix with the axis

U= 0,b2 a2

, 1, 0, −1 !

and the tangent vector

V1(t)= 1

b1+ b2t2+ b 3t4



a1t, a2t2, a3, a4t3, a5t4 .

Proof. We omit the proof since it is analogous to the proof of the Theorem 3.3. Theorem 3.11. Assume n ≥7 is an odd number,

a21= 2b1b2, a22= 2b1b3−b22> 0, a3= b1, a2n−1= 2bn−1 2 b n+1 2 , an= b n+1 2 , a22k+1= b2k+1− 2b1b2k+1+ 2 k X j=2 bjb2k− j+2> 0 for 2 ≤ k ≤ n − 32 and a22l= −2b1b2l+ 2 l X j=2 bjb2l− j+1> 0 for 2 ≤ l ≤ n − 3 2 such that 1 ≤ j ≤n+12 , bj∈ R+, bn+3 2 = bn+52 = · · · = bn−1= 0 and n+1 2 P

j=2bj> b1. Then, the curve β : I → E n 2defined by β (t) =a1 2t 2,a2 3t 3, a 3t,a4 4t 4,a5 5t 5,a6 6t 6, . . . , an−1 n − 1t n−1,an nt n

is a spacelike polynomial helix with the axis

U= b2 a2e2+ e3 − n−1 2 X m=3 bm a2m−1e2m−1 −en,

where I= (1, d) ⊂ R, d > 1 and the tangent vector V1(t)= 1 −b1+ n+1 2 P j=2bjt 2(j−1)  a1t, a2t2, a3, a4t3, a5t4, . . . , an−1tn−2, antn−1 .

(7)

Proof. We omit the proof since it is analogous to the proof of the Theorem 3.6. As a result of Theorem 3.11, we have the following corollary.

Corollary 3.12. It is easily seen that,

If 2a 2 2−b 2 2 a2 2 + n−1 2 X m=3 b2 m a2 2m−1

> 0, then the axis U is a spacelike vector,

If 2a 2 2−b22 a2 2 + n−1 2 X m=3 b2 m a2 2m−1

< 0, then the axis U is a timelike vector and If 2a 2 2−b 2 2 a2 2 + n−1 2 X m=3 b2 m a2 2m−1

= 0, then the axis U is a null vector.

Similarly, from the Theorem 3.10, one easily see the axis U is a spacelike, a timelike and a null vector if 2a2

2−b22 > 0, 2a22−b22< 0 and 2a22= b22, respectively.

Now, we give an example of a spacelike polynomial helix with the spacelike axis for n= 5. Example 3.13. If we choose b2= 1, b1= b3= 2 in Theorem 3.10, then we have the spacelike polynomial helix

β (t) = t2, √ 7 3 t 3, 2t,t4 2, 2t5 5 !

with the spacelike axis U= 0, √1

7, 1, 0, −1 !

and the tangent vector V1(t)= 1 2t4+ t2− 2  2t,√7 t2, 2, 2t3, 2t4 . Also, 1(V1(t), U) = −1.

Now, we give an example of a spacelike polynomial helix with the timelike axis for n= 5. Example 3.14. If we choose b1= 1, b2=

3, b3 = 2 in Theorem 3.10, then we have the spacelike polynomial helix

β (t) = 4 √ 3 √ 2t 2,t3 3, t, 4 √ 3 2 t 4,2t5 5 !

with the timelike axis U=0,

3, 1, 0, −1 . and the tangent vector

V1(t)= 1 2t4+ √ 3t2− 1 √4 12 t, t2, 1,√4 48 t3, 2t4 . Also, 1(V1(t), U) = −1.

(8)

Now, we give an example of a spacelike polynomial helix with the null axis for n= 5.

Example 3.15. If we choose b1= 1, b2= 2, b3= 3 in Theorem 3.10, then we have the spacelike polynomial helix

β (t) = t2, √ 2 3 t 3, t, √ 3 2 t 4,3t5 5 !

with the null axis U=0,

2, 1, 0, −1 . and the tangent vector

V1(t)= 1 3t4+ 2t2− 1  2t,√2 t2, 1, 2 √ 3 t3, 3t4 . Also, 1(V1(t), U) = −1.

4. Timelike Polynomial Helices in En

2

In this section we give families of timelike polynomial helices with spacelike, timelike or null axis. Theorem 4.1. Let n= 4 and β : I − {0} ⊂ R → E42be a curve defined by

β (t) =a1 5t 5+ a 2t, a3 4t 4,a4 3t 3, −a 2t  . If a1= b2, a2= b2 1 b2, a 2 3= 2b1b2, a4= b1

with b1, b2∈ R+, thenβ is a timelike polynomial helix with the spacelike axis

U= (−1, 0, 1, 1) .

Proof. From the straightforward calculations, we have 1 β0(t), β0 (t)= −b 1t2+ b2t4 2 , V1(t)= 1 b2t4+ b1t2  b2t4+ a2, a3t3, b1t2, −a2 , 1(V1(t), U) = 1.

Therefore,β is a timelike polynomial helix.

Example 4.2. If we choose b1= 2, b2= 1 in Theorem 4.1, then we have the timelike polynomial helix

β (t) = t5 5 + 4t, t4 2, 2t3 3 , −4t !

with the spacelike axis U= (−1, 0, 1, 1)

(9)

and the tangent vector V1(t)= 1 t4+ 2t2  t4+ 4, 2t3, 2t2, −4 . Also, 1(V1(t), U) = 1.

Theorem 4.3. Let n= 5 and β : I − {0} ⊂ R → E5

2be a curve defined by β (t) =a1 7t 7+a2 5t 5+ a 3t,a4 5t 5,a5 4t 4,a6 3t 3, −a 3t  . If a1= b3, a2= b2, a3= b2 1 b2, a 2 4= 2b1b3, a 2 5= 2b2 1b3− 2b1b 2 2 b2 > 0, a 6= b1

with 1 ≤ j ≤ 3, bj∈ R+thenβ is a timelike polynomial helix with the spacelike axis

U= (−1, 0, 0, 1, 1) and the tangent vector

V1(t)= 1

b1t2+ b2t4+ b3t6



a1t6+ a2t4+ a3, a4t4, a5t3, a6t2, −a3 .

Proof. We omit the proof since it is analogous to the proof of the Theorem 4.1.

Example 4.4. If we choose b1= 2, b2= 1, b3 = 2 in Theorem 4.3, then we have the timelike polynomial helix

β (t) = 2t7 7 + t5 5 + 4t, 2 √ 2 5 t 5, √ 3 2 t 4,2t3 3 , −4t !

with the spacelike axis U= (−1, 0, 0, 1, 1) and the tangent vector

V1(t)= 1 2t6+ t4+ 2t2  2t6+ t4+ 4, 2 √ 2 t4, 2 √ 3 t3, 2t2, −4 . Also, 1(V1(t), U) = 1.

Theorem 4.5. Let n ≥6 andβ : I − {0} ⊂ R → En2be a curve defined by β (t) = a1 2n − 3t 2n−3+ a2 2n − 5t 2n−5+ · · · +an−3 5 t 5+ a n−2t, an−1 n t n, an n − 1t n−1, an+1 n − 2t n−2, . . . ,a2n−4 3 t 3, −a n−2t  . If a2n−4= b1, an−3= b2, an−4= b3, . . . , a2= bn−3, a1= bn−2,

(10)

an−2= b2 1 b2, a 2 n−1= 2b1bn−2, a22n−5= 2b21b3− 2b1b22 b2 > 0 and a2k= 2an−2ak−n+1− 2a2n−4ak−n+2> 0 for n ≤ k ≤ 2n − 6

with biis a positive constant for 1 ≤ i ≤ n − 2 thenβ is a timelike helix with the spacelike axis

U= −e1+ en−1+ en

and the tangent vector V1(t)= 1 n−2 P j=1bjt 2 j  a1t2n−4+ a2t2n−6+ · · · + an−3t4+ an−2, an−1tn−1, antn−2, an+1tn−3, . . . , a2n−4t2, −an−2 .

Proof. We omit the proof since it is analogous to the proof of the Theorem 4.1. Theorem 4.6. Let n ≥4 andβ : I − {0} ⊂ R → En

2be a curve defined by β (t) = a1 2n − 3t 2n−3+ a2 2n − 5t 2n−5+ · · · +an−2 3 t 3, a n−1t, an 2t 2,an+1 3 t 3, . . . ,a2n−3 n − 1t n−1. If a1= bn−1, a2= bn−2, a3= bn−3, . . . an−1= b1 and a2 n= 2b1b2, a2n+1= 2b1b3, . . . , a22n−3= 2b1bn−1,

with biis a positive constant for 1 ≤ i ≤ n − 1 thenβ is a timelike helix with the timelike axis

U= e1−e2

and tangent vector V1(t)= 1 −b1+n−1P j=2bjt 2(j−1)  a1t2n−4+ a2t2n−6+ · · · + an−2t2, an−1, ant, an+1t2, . . . , a2n−3tn−2 .

Proof. We omit the proof since it is analogous to the proof of the Theorem 3.6.

Example 4.7. If we choose n= 4; b1= 1, b2= 2, b3= 1 in Theorem 4.6, then we have the timelike polynomial helix

β (t) = t5 5 + 2t3 3 , t, t 2, √ 2t3 3 !

with the timelike axis U= (1, −1, 0, 0) and the tangent vector

V1(t)= 1 t4+ 2t2− 1  t4+ 2t2, 1, 2t, √ 2 t2 . Also, 1(V1(t), U) = −1.

(11)

Theorem 4.8. Let n ≥4 andβ : I = (0, 1) ⊂ R → En 2be a curve defined by β (t) = a1 2n − 3t 2n−3+ a2 2n − 5t 2n−5+ · · · +an−2 3 t 3+ t, an−1 n − 1t n−1, an n − 2t n−2, . . . ,a2n−4 2 t 2, t. If a1= −bn−2, a2= bn−3, a3= bn−4, . . . an−2= b1 and a2n−1= 2bn−2, a2n= 2bn−3, a2n+1= 2bn−4, . . . , a22n−4= 2b1

with biis a positive constant for 1 ≤ i ≤ n − 2 and b1≥bn−2thenβ is a timelike helix with the null axis

U= e1+ en,

and tangent vector

V1(t)= 1 t2       −bn−2t2n−6+n−2P j=2bj−1t 2(j−2)        a1t2n−4+ a2t2n−6+ · · · + an−2t2+ 1, an−1tn−2, antn−3, . . . , a2n−4t, 1 .

Proof. We omit the proof since it is analogous to the proof of the Theorem 3.6.

Example 4.9. If we choose n= 5; b1= b2= 2 and b3= 1 in Theorem 4.8, then we have the timelike polynomial helix

β (t) = −2t 7 7 + 2t5 5 + 2t3 3 + t, t4 2, 2t3 3 , t 2, t !

with the null axis U= (1, 0, 0, 0, 1) and the tangent vector

V1(t)= 1 −2t6+ 2t4+ 2t2  −2t6+ 2t4+ 2t2+ 1, 2t3, 2t2, 2t, 1 . Also, 1(V1(t), U) = −1. References

[1] B. Altunkaya, Helices in n-dimensional Minkowski spacetime, Results in Physics 14 (2019) 102445.

[2] B. Altunkaya, L. Kula, On polynomial general helices in n-dimensional Euclidean space Rn, Advances in Applied Clifford Algebras 28(4) (2018) 1–12.

[3] C¸ . Camcı, K. ˙Ilarslan, L. Kula, H.H. Hacısaliho ˘glu, Harmonic curvatures and generalized helices in En, Chaos, Solution and

Fractals 40 (2009) 2590–2596.

[4] Z. Erjavec, On generalization of helices in the Galilean and the pseudo-Galilean space, Journal of Mathematics Research 6(3) (2014) 39–50.

[5] H.H. Hacısaliho ˘glu, Diferensiyel Geometri 1, (3rd edition), 1998.

[6] K. ˙Ilarslan, N. Kılıc¸, H.A. Erdem, Osculating curves in 4-dimensional semi-Euclidean space with index 2, Open Mathematics 15(1) (2017) 562–567.

[7] R. Lopez, Differential geometry of curves and surfaces in Lorentz-Minkowski space, International Electronic Journal of Geometry 7(1) (2014) 44–107.

(12)

[8] B. Manuel, F. Angel, L. Pascual, A.M. Miguel, General helices in the 3-dimensional Lorentzian space forms, Rocky Mountain Journal of Mathematics 31(2) (2001) 373–388.

[9] A.O. Ogrenmis, M. Ergut, M. Bektas, On the helices in the Galilean space G3, Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transaction A 31 (A2) (2007) 177–181.

[10] B. O’Neil, Semi-Riemannian geometry with applications to relativity, Academic Press, London, 1983.

[11] E. ¨Ozdamar, H.H. Hacısaliho ˘glu, A characterization of inclined curves in Euclidean n-space, Comm. Fac. Sci. Univ. Ankara Ser A1 (24) (1975) 15–23.

[12] A. Sabuncuo ˘glu, Diferensiyel Geometri, (5th edition), Nobel Press, 2014. [13] D.J. Struik, Lectures on Classical Differential Geometry, Dover, New York, 1988.

[14] J. Sun, D. Pei, Some new properties of null curves on 3-null cone and unit semi-Euclidean 3-spheres, Journal of Nonlinear Science and Applications 8 (2015) 275–284.

[15] A. Uc¸um, C¸ . Camci, K. ˙Ilarslan, General helices with spacelike slope axis in Minkowski 3-space, Asian-European Journal of Mathematics 12 (5) (2019) 1950076.

[16] A. Uc¸um, C¸ . Camci, K. ˙Ilarslan, General helices with timelike slope axis in Minkowski 3-space, Advances in Applied Clifford Algebras 26 (2016) 793–807.

[17] D.W Yoon, General helices of AW(k)-type in the Lie Group, Hindawi Publishing Corporation Journal of Applied Mathematics 2012 (2012) 535123.

Referanslar

Benzer Belgeler

Moreover, the libration frequency, as well as the electronic and magnetic properties of the flake +monolayer systems, can be tuned by a foreign molecule anchored to the flake,

Figure 4.6: Optical microscope image of the finished device that shows graphene patch, source-drain contacts and smaller regions of fractal patterns in between. by conducting dose

27 Nevertheless, in the previous studies, the Rabi splitting energy of the plexcitonic nanoparticles is not tunable 10 and thus their optical properties cannot be tailored, which

gemileri ziyaret etmekteydi. İzmirle bağlantılı transit ticaret yolu üzerinde yer alan Rodos adasına yelkenli gemiler uğrarken sanayi devriminin ardından adada ticaret giderek

Kullanımdaki Dizin (Current Folder) Penceresi; Matlab’ın herhangi bir anda aktif olarak kullandığı geçerli dizin yolunu değiştirmek, içinde bulunulan klasör içerisinde

Araştırma sonuçlarına gore okul yöneticilerinin karar verme stillerinin alt boyutları cinsiyet değişkenine incelendiğinde dikkatli, kaçıngan, erteleyici karar

Türk rekabet hukukunda, bir ortak girişim anlaşmasının Kanun’un 4’üncü maddesine göre yasaklanabilmesi için; ortak girişimin en az iki ya da daha fazla ana

Bu bağlamda, öğrencilerinin matematiksel anlamaları ile matematiğe yönelik tutumları arasında yüksek düzeyde pozitif ve anlamlı bir ilişkinin olduğu,