• Sonuç bulunamadı

Comparisons of oral propafenone and sotalol as an initial treatment in patients with symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Comparisons of oral propafenone and sotalol as an initial treatment in patients with symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation."

Copied!
2
0
0

Yükleniyor.... (view fulltext now)

Tam metin

(1)

Comparisons of oral propafenone and

sotalol as an initial treatment in patients

with symptomatic paroxysmal atrial

fibrillation

陳亦仁

Lee SH;Chen SA;Tai CT;Chiang CE;Wen ZC;Chen YJ;Yu

WC;Huang JL;Feng AN;Cheng JJ and Chang MS

摘要

Abstract

The main goal of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of

propafenone versus sotalol as an initial choice of treatment in patients with symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF), according to a double-blind randomized system. In the oral propafenone group (n = 41), 2 patients (5%) discontinued therapy because of gastrointestinal discomfort in 1 and dizziness in the other. Thirty-one (79%) of the 39 patients who continued the treatment had effective response to oral propafenone (>75% reduction of symptomatic arrhythmic attacks) on a mean dose of 663 +/- 99 mg/day with a decrease in attack frequency from 10 +/- 3 to 2 +/- 1 times per week. In the oral sotalol group (n = 38), 4 patients (11%) discontinued treatment because of dizziness in 2 and symptomatic bradycardia in 2. Twenty-six of the 34 patients (76%) who continued the treatment had effective response to oral sotalol on a mean dose of 200 +/- 57 mg/day with a decrease in attack frequency from 11 +/- 3 to 2 +/- 1 times per week. Comparisons of the results between propafenone and sotalol groups showed a similar incidence of intolerable (2 of 41 vs 4 of 38, p = 0.42) and tolerable side effects (10 of 39 vs 8 of 34, p = 1.0). The attack

frequency at baseline (11 +/- 3 vs 10 +/- 4 times per week, p = 0.23) and after treatment (3 +/- 1 vs 3 +/- 2 times per week, p = 0.85) did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. The incidence of effective response to drugs was also similar (31 of 39 vs 26 of 34, p = 0.78). Furthermore, the decrease of symptom scores (-32 +/- 8% vs -29 +/- 7%, p = 0.18) and percentage decrease of

(2)

ventricular rate (-15 +/- 4% vs -18 +/- 4%, p = 0.10) during AF were also similar between the 2 groups. In conclusion, oral propafenone and sotalol are equally effective and safe in preventing attacks and alleviating symptoms of

Referanslar

Benzer Belgeler

Long-term mortality of patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implan- tation for acute and stable coronary artery disease..

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs), or direct oral anticoagulants, are approved for treatment of stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial

An analysis of the Rivaroxaban Once Daily Oral Direct Factor Xa Inhibitor Compared with Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate whether fluvastatin therapy could decrease the probability of atrial fibrillation (AF) progression from paroxysmal AF to permanent AF

(3) firstly suggested the concept of “East Asian Paradox.” Despite low response to clopidogrel in East Asians (mainly due to high prevalence of the cytochrome P450

With regard to the difference in left ventricular function bet- ween patients with and without left atrial appendage thrombi, we agree that it could have influenced the difference

The effect of rate con- trol on quality of life in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation: data from the RACE II (Rate Control Efficacy in Permanent Atrial Fibrillation

雙和舉辦系列講座歡度婦幼節 為提供女性與小朋友優質的醫療服務,雙和醫院致力建構優質婦 幼團隊,4 月婦幼節更於 3 日與