• Sonuç bulunamadı

Is the COPD assessment test (CAT) effective in demonstrating the systemic inflammation and other components in COPD?

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Is the COPD assessment test (CAT) effective in demonstrating the systemic inflammation and other components in COPD?"

Copied!
7
0
0

Yükleniyor.... (view fulltext now)

Tam metin

(1)

www.revportpneumol.org

ORIGINAL

ARTICLE

Is

the

COPD

assessment

test

(CAT)

effective

in

demonstrating

the

systemic

inflammation

and

other

components

in

COPD?

N.

Sarioglu

a,

,

A.A.

Hismiogullari

b

,

C.

Bilen

c

,

F.

Erel

a

aBalikesirUniversityMedicalFaculty,DepartmentofPulmonology,Balikesir,Turkey bBalikesirUniversityMedicalFaculty,DepartmentofBiochemistry,Balikesir,Turkey

cBalikesirUniversityScienceandArtFaculty,DepartmentofChemistry/BiochemistryDivision,Balikesir,Turkey

Received28April2015;accepted2August2015 Availableonline31October2015

KEYWORDS COPD; Inflammatorymarker; CAT; Qualityoflife Abstract

Introduction:Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is currently acomplex, multi-component disorder. The COPDAssessment Test(CAT) hasbeen increasingly used toassess COPDpatients.ThisstudyaimstoinvestigatetherelationshipbetweenCATandinflammation markersandotherCOPDcomponents.

Methods:Weenrolled110stableCOPDpatientsand65controlsubjectsinthisstudy.Allpatients completed theCAT questionnaire andthe modified Medical ResearchCouncil (mMRC) disp-neascale. Thequality oflife ofthese patientswas measuredwithSt.George’sRespiratory Questionnaire(SGRQ).LevelsofTNF␣,IL-6,CRPweredeterminedinbloodsamples.

Results:InCOPDpatients,serumlevelsofTNF␣(109.5±58pg/ml),IL-6(10.3±18pg/ml),and C-reactiveprotein (CRP)(1.6±1.7mg/L)werefound tobesignificantlyhighercompared to controls(TNF-␣:14.6±18pg/ml,IL-6:2.14±1.9pg/ml,CRP:0.4±0.3mg/L,p<0.001).These markerswere correlated withsmoking(rfrom 0.27to0.35, p<0.001),FEV1 (rfrom −0.39

to−0.57,p<0.001),FVC(rfrom−0.32to−0.37,p<0.001)andFEV1/FVC(rfrom−0.31to

−0.66,p<0.001).TheCATscorecorrelatedwithGOLDspirometricstages,mMRCdyspneascore, numberofexacerbationsinthepreviousyearandFEV1(p<0.001).Therewasasignificant

cor-relationbetweenlevelsofCRPandtheCATscore(r=0.43,p<0.001)butnosimilarrelationship betweenlevelsofTNF␣andIL-6andtheCATwasobserved.

Conclusion: SystemicinflammationpersistsinthestableperiodofCOPD.CRP,oneofthe inflam-mation markers, was correlated withthe CAT. Further studies are required to confirmthe relationshipbetweenCATandbiomarkers.

©2015SociedadePortuguesadePneumologia.PublishedbyElsevierEspaña,S.L.U.Allrights reserved.

Correspondingauthor.

E-mailaddress:nurhangencer@hotmail.com(N.Sarioglu).

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rppnen.2015.08.007

(2)

Introduction

Chronicobstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a signif-icantcause ofmortalityand morbidityacross themodern world.Themortalityrateof thisdiseaseisincreasingand itispredicted thatitwillbecome thethirdleadingcause of deathworldwide by 2020.1 It is not possible to define COPDbased solely onforced expiratory volume in the 1s (FEV1)sotheGlobalInitiativeforChronicObstructivelung Disease(GOLD)hasdevisedamultidimensionaldefinitionto assessCOPD.2 The newdefinitionincludes the prevalence of symptomsand theprevious historyof exacerbations in additiontotheFEV1valueandalsoemphasizesthe assess-ment of comorbidities. In order to assess for symptoms, eitherthemodifiedMedicalResearchCouncil(mMRC)orthe COPDAssessmentTest(CAT)isrecommended.Additionally, adisease-specific qualityoflife scale (SGRQ,SF-36, CCQ) wasused to evaluate the impactof the disease on daily life.Somestudieshavedemonstratedastrongrelationship between CAT and St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ).3,4Ladeiraetal.5 showedthatCAT wascorrelated totheBODEindex.

COPDisa complexdiseaseandincludesgenetic, cellu-lar and molecular components. There are many different cells and molecules involved in the inflammatory path-ways.Severalindicatorshavebeen usedtodemonstratea potentialdisease-relatedsystemicinflammation.6---9 Airway andlungparenchymal inflammationis amajorpathogenic mechanismofCOPD.Inaddition,persistentsystemic inflam-mation may be associated witha various extrapulmonary comorbiditiesandpulmonaryeffects.10Recentresearchhas providedproofoftheexistenceofdistinct‘‘novelsystemic inflammatoryCOPDphenotype.’’7Inarecentstudy,ithas been shown that cardiovascularcomorbidity and diabetes were associated with higher levels for some markers of systemicinflammation.11Therefore,geneticload,systemic inflammation and comorbid diseases are associated with variousphenotypes in COPD.It is essential that new per-spectives shouldbedeveloped in themanagement ofthis disease.

Currently,CAT hasbeen usedincreasingly for assessing andmonitoring COPD. Although severalserumbiomarkers have been defined in COPD,there is not onesingle suffi-cient and effective singlebiomarker that can be used to assessthestatusofCOPDpatients.Ithasbeenshownthat biomarkersareassociatedwithseveralparameterssuchas inflammation, hospitalization, andmortality.7---13 However, therelationshipbetweenCATandbiomarkershasnotbeen clearlydemonstrated.Therefore,thepresentstudyaimsto investigatethelevelsofsystemicinflammationinCOPDand determinetherelationshipbetweenCATandinflammation markersandqualityoflife.

Materials

and

methods

Studydesign

This wasa cross-sectional single-visitobservational study. OnehundredandtenpatientswithCOPDdiagnosed accord-ingtoGOLD criteria14 andsixty-fivecontrolsubjectswere recruitedbetweenFebruary2013andAugust2013.Control

subjectswerechosenfromthosereferredtoapulmonology andinternalmedicineclinicatBalikesirUniversityHospital, undergoing routine investigations. Written informed con-sent wasobtainedfromallparticipantsandthestudywas approvedbytheInstitutionalEthicsCommitteeofthe Fac-ultyofMedicineatBalikesirUniversity.

All patients were subjected to physical examination, chest X-ray, respiratory function test, and routine blood analysistests.Thenumberofexacerbationsintheprevious year and the history of smokingwere recorded.The CAT, mMRCdyspneascorewascarriedoutviaface-to-face inter-viewsbypulmonary specialist.SGRQscoreswerereported bythepatients.Forthehealthycontrolgrouponlya respi-ratoryfunction test androutineblood analysis testswere done.

Thepopulationofthestudy

Inclusioncriteria:Patientswereincludedifthey;(1)were older than 40 years;(2) were current or ex-smokerswith a smoking history ≥10 pack-years; (3) exhibited a post-bronchodilator FEV1<80% and an FEV1/FVC<0.7. Control subjects were included if they: (1) were older than 40 years; (2) were free from lung disease as determined by a physician; (3) had a normal spirometry (FEV1>85% and FEV1/FVC>0.7);and(4)hadasmokinghistoryof<5 pack-year.

Exclusioncriteria:Patientswereexcludedwho;(1)had an exacerbationofCOPDwithintheprevious 6weeks;(2) hadarespiratorydisorderotherthanCOPDormalignancy; (3)hada chronicinflammatory disease(vasculitis, inflam-matory bowel disease, rheumatoid arthritis etc.) (4) had uncontrolledorsevereconcomitantdisease(MI,arrhythmia etc.).

Measurements

Demographicfeatures,age,gender,smokinghabits, admis-siontoanemergencyserviceorhospitalizationoverthepast year,accompanyingdiseases,andexistingtreatmentswere allrecorded appropriately.We definedanexacerbationas worsening of symptoms that required oral corticosteroids and/or antibiotics and/or hospitalization. Comorbid dis-easeswereestablishedusingtheclinicalhistoryandphysical examination findings during the visit and were supported by a review of the available medical records. Current medications including inhalers, antihypertensive or other medications were documented. The height, weight, and BMI indexes were measured, and a spirometry was also performed inaccordancewiththeinternationalguidelines (ATS/ERS).15Thediseasewasclassifiedaccordingtotheold andnewversionofGOLDstaging.14First,GOLDspirometric staging(FEV1based(1---4)staging)andsecond,GOLD stag-ing(A---Dclass).DyspneawasassessedbythemMRCdyspnea scale.16ThepatientswithCOPDwerecategorizedintoA,B, CandDcombiningsymptomassessmentbymMRCdyspnea scoresandexacerbationrisk.

CAT:ThevalidityandreliabilityoftheTurkishversionof thisscale hasbeenpreviouslyverified.17 The CATincludes 8itemsandyieldstotalscoresrangingfrom0to40;higher

(3)

scoresindicateamoresevere healthstatusimpairmentor lesssuccessfulcontrolofCOPD.3

Quality of life Questionnaire: The quality of life was assessed by using the Turkish translation of St. George’s RespiratoryDiseasesQuestionnaire(SGRQ).18

Biomarkers

We chose the biomarkers based on previous studies.7,9---13 Thebloodsamplestakenfromallsubjectswerecentrifuged andstoredat−80◦C.Allsampleswereanalyzedwhenthe studywascompleted.Theserumwasstudiedina diagnos-ticdevice (BioTek, ELx800, USA) withuseof commercial kits (eBioscience, HumanTNF-␣and HumanIL-6Platinum ELISA, Austria), and with the methods of tumor necrosis alpha(TNF-␣)andaninterleukin-6(IL-6)levelenzymelinked immunosorbentassay(ELISA).ThelevelsofC-reactive pro-tein(CRP)wereevaluatedwithaclinicalchemistryanalyzer (CobesIntegra800,Rochediagnostics)usingacommercial kit.ThereferencevalueofCRPis0---0.5mg/L,whilethe ana-lyzedlowestvalueofIL-6is0.92pg/ml.Theanalyzedlowest valueofTNF␣is2.3pg/ml.TNF-␣andIL-6concentrationsof somesampleswerebelowthelowerlimitofquantification (LLQ).Intheanalysisofindividuals withvaluesbelow the LLQ,anominallevelof halfoftheLLQvalue wasusedto avoidadownwardbiasofthepopulationdata.19

Statisticalanalysis

The average CRP values of COPD and control groups (3.2 (1.5,7.1), 1.3 (0.6,2.7)) were identified from similar studies.7 After that, in each group, the sample size was calculated by using average calculating formula with80% accuracy and 5% error. Accordingly, the sample size was found to be at least 55 subjects in each group. Results are presented as mean±SD, median, or percentage, as appropriate.TheStudent’st-testandANOVAwereusedfor parametrictests;theMann---WhitneyU-test,Kruskal---Wallis andchi-squarestatisticswereusedfornon-parametrictests forgroupcomparisons.Fisher’sexacttestevaluatedthe dif-ferencesbetweenthepercentagesofcomorbiditiesandthe differencesbetween sexes. The chi-squaretest evaluated thedifferencesbetweenthepercentagesofcomorbidities. Pair-wisecorrelationofcontinuousvariablesinpatientswith COPD was examined by Pearson correlation. A value of

p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statis-ticalanalyseswereperformedwiththeSPSS(version20.0) software.

Results

Clinicalcharacterizationofsubjects

Thestudyincluded110patients(meanageof64±8.9years; 100 male (90.9%)), and65 control subjects (mean age of 61.5±9.2 years, 55 male (84.6%)). The demographic and clinical characteristics of the patient and control groups are given in Table 1. Forty-five (40.9%) patients with COPD had an accompanying disease (Ischemic heart dis-ease(n=21),hypertension(n=13),diabetesmellitus(n=8), other (n=3)).The mean FEV1 was48.8% of thepredicted value andmeanFEV1/FVC: 55.4%in theCOPD group.The

meanCATscorewas22.6(±9.2),mMRC:1.9(±0.9)andtotal SGRQ:58.4(±22.2).Ofthe110patients,9.1%werestage1, 37.3%werestage2,42.7%werestage3,10.9%werestage4 accordingtoGOLDspirometricstaging.Whenpatientswere classifiedwithrespecttoGOLDstaging, 27.3%weregroup A,30.9%weregroupB,7.3%weregroupCand34.5%were groupD.

COPD/controlcomparisons

There was no significant difference between the ages (p=0.080, Student’s t-test) and sexes of the two groups (p=0.453,fisher’s exacttest)(Table1).Thegroups exhib-ited similar incidences of comorbidities (p=0.095, 2 test). As expected, COPDpatients hadsignificantly lower pulmonary function parameters (FEV1, FVC, FEV1/FVC) compared to controls (p<0.001, Student’s t-test). In general, COPD patients exhibited higher serum levels of CRP (1.6±1.7mg/L) and TNF-␣ (109.5±58pg/ml) and IL-6 (10.3±18pg/ml) than healthy controls (CRP: 0.4±0.3mg/L,p<0.001;TNF-␣:14.6±18pg/ml,p<0.001; IL-6:2.14±1.9pg/ml,p<0.001,Student’st-test)(Table1).

AssociationofCATquestionnairesandpatient

characteristics

There was a correlation between the CAT score and the GOLDspirometricstage(Pearson’sr=0.43;p<0.001). The CATscoreincreasedinparallelwithdiseaseseverity.There wasastatisticallysignificantrelationshipbetweentheCAT score and number of exacerbations in the previous year (Pearson’s r=0.35, p<0.001), disease duration (Pearson’s

r=0.29,p<0.001),smoking(pack-year)(Pearson’sr=0.27,

p=0.014) and mMRC (Pearson’s r=0.59, p<0.001). The CAT score was found to be significantly correlated with FEV1 (Pearson’s r=−0.39, p<0.001) and FVC (Pearson’s

r=−42,p=0.003). Atthe sametime,astrong correlation wasobservedbetweenthe CATscoreandtheSGRQ symp-tom,activity, impact and total scores (Pearson’s r=0.72;

p<0.001).

Associationbetweenbiomarkersandpatient

characteristics

Inflammatorymarkersandpulmonary functionparameters werecompared.AstheFEV1decreased,levelsofbiomarker increasedsignificantly.CRPlevelswerecorrelatedwithFEV1 (Pearson’s r=−0.39, p<0.001), FVC (Pearson’s r=−0.33,

p<0.001) and FEV1/FVC (Pearson’s r=−0.38, p<0.001). TNF-␣ levels were also correlated with FEV1 (Pearson’s

r=−0.57,p<0.001),FVC(Pearson’sr=−0.37,p<0.001)and FEV1/FVC (Pearson’sr=−0.66,p<0.001).IL-6levelswere alsocorrelated with FEV1 (Pearson’s r=−0.31,p<0.001), FVC (Pearson’s r=−0.32, p<0.001) and FEV1/FVC (Pear-son’s r=−0.34, p<0.001). A significant correlation was observedbetweenCRP,TNF-␣,IL-6andsmoking(pack-year) (Pearson’sr=0.35,r=0.44,r=0.27,p<0.001,respectively). COPDpatientswithcardiovasculardiseasehadanincreased levelofCRP (2.98±2.4mg/L)comparedtopatients with-out comorbidities (1.56±1.5mg/L, p=0.008 ANOVA test

(4)

Table1 Demographic,functional,clinicalfeaturesofthepatientandcontrolgroups.

Patient(n=110) Control(n=65) p-value

Age 64.0±8.9 61.5±9.2 0.080 Malen,(%) 100(90.9) 55(84.6) 0.224 BMI,kg/m2 26.5±5.6 25.6±2 0.064 Pack-years 38.9±23 0.1±1.2 <0.001 Co-morbidities,n(%) Any 65(59.1) 42(64.6) 0.95

Ischemicheartdisease 21(19.1) 11(16.9)

HT 13(11.8) 6(9.2) DM 8(7.3) 4(6.2) Other 3(2.7) 2(3.1) mMRC 1.94±0.9 0.04±0.2 <0.001 FEV1,%predicted 48.8±17.8 89.4±5.6 <0.001 FVC,%predicted 68.7±17.8 92.1±5.8 <0.001 FEV1/FVC,% 55.4±12.9 89.6±4.7 <0.001

GOLDspirometricstage,n(%)

1 10(9.1) 2 41(37.3) 3 47(42.7) 4 12(10.9) GOLDstage,n(%) A 30(27.3) B 34(30.9) C 8(7.3) D 38(34.5) SGRQ-totalscore 58.4±22.2 CATscore 22.6±9.2 TNF␣(pg/ml) 109.5±58 14.6±18 <0.001 IL-6(pg/ml) 10.3±18 2.14±1.9 <0.001 CRP(mg/L) 1.6±1.7 0.4±0.3 <0.001

Abbreviations:BMI,bodymassindex,HT:hypertension,DM:diabetes,FEV1:forcedexpiratoryvolumein1second,FVC:forcedvital

capacity,CAT:COPDassessmenttest.

followed by LSD post hoc test). There was no significant associationwithotherbiomarkersandcomorbidities.Asthe IL-6 increased, the mMRC score increased, but this rela-tionship was not statistically significant (p=0.06). When inflammatorymarkerswerecomparedwithCATscore,CRP levelswereshowntohaveasignificantcorrelation(r=0.43,

p<0.001)(Fig. 1)while no correlation wasobserved with TNF-␣andIL-6.TherewasacorrelationbetweenCRP lev-elsandTNF␣(r=0.48,p<0.001).Nodirectassociationwas observedbetweenbiomarkersandA-Dclassorspirometric stages.

Discussion

Someassessmenttoolsareusedsuchasclinicaltests(CAT, BODE),inflammation markersandqualityof life question-naires toevaluate COPD. It is commonly accepted that a multidimensionalassessmentisrequiredtounderstandand manage the disease. COPD is a complex disorder with a systemiccomponent andsomepatientsappeartohave an inflammatoryphenotype. Inthisstudy,CAT wasperformed

0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 1 2 3 4 5 CRP (mg/L) CA T score 6 7 8 9

Figure 1 The relationship between CAT scores and CRP (r=0.43,p<0.001).

(5)

asanewclinicaltest,andtherelationshipofCATwithother COPDcomponentswasinvestigated.

Oneofthesecomponentsissystemicinflammation.The biomarkers most often studied in COPD to indicate sys-temicinflammationwhicharecommonlyusedareCRP,IL-6, TNF-␣,IL-8andfibrinogen.Severalstudieshavepreviously reported elevated circulating levels of these markers in patientswithstableCOPD.6---9,20---23Inarecentstudy,Agustí et al.showed that 30% of COPDpatients did not present evidenceofsystemicinflammationand16%ofthepatients didpresentpersistentsystemicinflammation.7Interestingly, in this study, the serum levels of TNF-␣ and IL-8 were foundtobehigherinsmokerswithnormalspirometry com-paredtoCOPDpatients.Theothermarkersaswhiteblood cells, IL-6,CRP andfibrinogen werefoundtobehigherin COPD patients than in the smokerswith normal spirome-tryandnon-smokers.Inourstudy,thelevelsofCRP,TNF-␣, IL-6 were significantly higher in all COPD patients when compared to the control group. All the biomarkers were foundtobecorrelatedwiththecumulativesmoking expo-sureandreductionof pulmonaryfunctiontest parameters (FEV1, FVC, and FEV1/FVC). The biomarkers level relate to the degree of airflow obstruction. These results are consistent withthosereported in previous crosssectional studies.13 In anotherstudy which examined the resultsof ECLIPSE, cardiovascular comorbidities and diabetes were correlated with some systemic inflammation markers.9 In our study,COPD patients with cardiovascular disease had an increased level of CRP compared to patients without comorbidities. Increased systemic inflammation in COPD with cardiovascular diseases supporta pathophysiological mechanismbetweenCOPDandthesecomorbidities.

TherelationshipbetweenCATandsystemicinflammation hasnotbeenclarifiedbythestudiesconductedsofar.Inone study,asignificantcorrelationwasshowntoexistbetween the LCN1, LCN2 andCAT.8 In ourstudy,a significant rela-tionshiphasbeenshownbetweenCATandCRP.However,a similarcorrelationcouldnotbeshownwithTNF-␣andIL-6. In the present study, COPD patients were categorized into four groups (A---D) and stages (1---4) according to old andnewversionofGOLDclassification.Itcanbeobserved thatStage1andStage4constitutethesmallestproportion ofthepopulationwith10%eachaccordingtotheold classi-fication.Inthenewversion,thepopulationwasdistributed almostequallyamonggroupsA,BandD;thesmallest dis-tributionwasthatofgroupC.Inother studies,ithasalso been shown thatgroup Cconstitutesthe smallest propor-tionofthedistribution.24,25Thenewclassificationindicates that theremaybesome patients withmultiple symptoms butmild airwayobstruction aswell assome patientswith fewsymptomsbutwithsevereairwayobstructions. Comor-biditiesandsystemicinflammationcanleadtoincreasesin exacerbationandsymptomsinpatientswithmild/moderate obstruction, and in this way, it causes these patients to be placed in the high risk groups (C or D class). In one study,itwasshown that subtypeC includes patientswith highercomorbiditystatus andsubtypeD includespatients withthemostsevereexacerbation,ahighrateof exacer-bation related tohospitalization and poorest outcomes.26 Ina recentstudy,Agustíetal.comparedtwogroups with andwithout persistentsystemic inflammation andshowed that patients presenting persistent inflammation during

follow-uphadincreasedexacerbationratesper year com-paredtotheothergroupalthoughpulmonaryabnormalities weresimilarinthesetwogroups.7

GOLD recommends the use of CAT or mMRC scale to assess symptoms. We used mMRC scale for group assign-ment,becausewhen we considered the symptomsonthe basisofCAT,thenumberofthepatientswithlessthan10 breakpoints was very small (8 patients). The higher CAT scores may be associated with the higher perceptions of patients’symptoms.ItwasalsoshownthatCATandmMRC arenot equivalent, and this may cause some differences inclassification.24,25,27 Inthe newclassification,the other cut-off points are composed of number of exacerbations per year. The relationship between basal CAT score and the frequency of exacerbations was shown in the COPD patients.28 Pothirat etal. have shown that the change in CATscoreduringmonitoringvisitsisausefultoolfor detec-tingacutedeteriorationinhealthstatusofCOPDpatients.29 In ourstudy, a strong relationship was observed between CAT,mMRCand theexacerbationrates. The CAT wasalso foundtobecorrelatedtothedurationofillness,and smok-ing(pack-year).ThemeanFEV1ofthepatientswasfoundto be48.8%ofthepredictedvalueandthemeanCATscorewas 22.6.AstrongassociationwasshownbetweenCATandFEV1, FVCandtheGOLDspirometricstage.AstheFEV1andFVC decreased,theCATscoreincreased.TheCATscorealso pos-itivelycorrelatedwithaheavierGOLDstage.Theseresults showthatCATreflectstheseverityofdiseaseverywell.

Another important component of COPD management is quality of life. A variety of life-questionnaires have been usedtoevaluatethe effectsof the diseaseondaily life. The reliabilityand validity of the Turkish version of SGRQ has been proved.30 A few studies have shown that significantly correlation was observed between CAT and SGRQ.3,4 In astudy,it hasbeen reported thatCAT is sen-sitivetothechangeinhealthstatusassociatedwithCOPD exacerbations.31 In our study, a strong relationship was shown between CAT and SGRQ. Since CAT, compared to SGRQ,is a shorterand easier test tounderstand, theuse ofCATismorepractical.

Thepresentstudyhasseverallimitations,suchas cross-sectionaldesign,asinglecenterstudyandsmallsamplesize. In addition,the inflammation markers couldnot be com-paredin smokerswhohave normal lung function because theywerenotincludedinthepresentstudy.Themedications forpatientsmayexertaninfluenceonsystemic inflamma-toryresponseandhealthstatusandtheymayalsoaffectthe results.

Insummary,CATisatestthatcanbeusedinthe assess-mentof COPD,sinceitsreliabilityand validityhave been clearlydemonstrated.Theresultsofourstudyindicatethe relationship between CAT andCRP aswell asother COPD components(clinical,functionalparameters).However, lon-gitudinalmulticenterstudiesarerequired toevaluatethe relationshipbetweenCATandbiomarkers.

Ethical

disclosures

Protection of human and animal subjects.The authors declarethatnoexperimentswereperformedonhumansor animalsforthisstudy.

(6)

Confidentialityofdata.Theauthorsdeclarethattheyhave followedtheprotocolsoftheirworkcenteronthe publica-tionofpatientdataandthatallthepatientsincludedinthe studyreceivedsufficientinformationandgavetheirwritten informedconsenttoparticipateinthestudy.

Righttoprivacyandinformedconsent.Theauthorshave obtainedthe written informed consentof the patients or subjectsmentionedinthearticle.Thecorrespondingauthor isinpossessionofthisdocument.

Authorship

Studydesign:NS,FEandAAH;Datacollection:NS,CB;Data analysisandinterpretation:NS,AAH,andCB;Critical revi-sionofthemanuscript:NS,FE,CBandAAH.

Conflicts

of

interest

Theauthorsdeclarethattheyhavenoconflictofinterestin thepreparationofthismanuscript.

Acknowledgements

This study wassupported by Balikesir University Research Funds(Project number:BAP 2012/95). The authorsthank Prof.Dr.A.SaidBODURfromBalikesirUniversity,Facultyof Medicine,DepartmentofPublicHealthforhisassistancein statisticalanalysis.

References

1.Mannino DM, Buist AS. Global burden ofCOPD: risk factors, prevalence,andfuturetrends.Lancet.2007;370:765---73.

2.Vestbo J, Hurd SS, Agustí AG, Jones PW, Vogelmeier C, Anzueto A, et al. Global strategy for the diagnosis, man-agement, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease:GOLDexecutivesummary.AmJRespirCritCareMed. 2013;187:347---65.

3.JonesPW,HardingG,BerryP,WiklundI,ChenWH,KlineLeidy N.Developmentand first validationoftheCOPD Assessment Test.EurRespirJ.2009;34:648---54.

4.RingbaekT,MartinezG,LangeP.Acomparisonoftheassessment ofqualityoflifewithCAT, CCQ,and SGRQinCOPD patients participatinginpulmonaryrehabilitation.COPD.2012;9:12---5.

5.LadeiraI,GomesT,CastroA,RibeiroC,GuimarãesM,Taveira N.TheoverallimpactofCOPD(CAT)andBODEindexonCOPD malepatients:correlation?RevPortPneumol(Barc).2015;21: 11---5.

6.FanerR,Tal-SingerR,RileyJH,CelliB,VestboJ,MacNeeW, etal.LessonsfromECLIPSE:areviewofCOPDbiomarkers. Tho-rax.2014;69:666---72.

7.AgustíA,EdwardsLD,RennardSI,MacNeeW,Tal-SingerR,Miller BE,etal.Persistentsystemicinflammationisassociatedwith poorclinicaloutcomesinCOPD:anovelphenotype.PLoSONE. 2012;7:e37483.

8.WangXR,LiYP,GaoS,XiaW,GaoK,KongQH,etal.Increased serumlevelsoflipocalin-1and-2inpatientswithstablechronic obstructivepulmonarydisease.IntJChronObstructPulmonDis. 2014;27:543---9.

9.deMoraesMR,daCostaAC,CorrêaKdeS,Junqueira-KipnisAP, Rabahi MF.Interleukin-6and interleukin-8blood levels’poor associationwiththeseverityandclinicalprofileofex-smokers withCOPD.IntJChronObstructPulmonDis.2014;29:735---43.

10.Kostikas K, Bakakos P, Papiris S, Stolz D, Celli BR. Sys-temicbiomarkersintheevaluationandmanagementofCOPD patients:arewegettingclosertoclinicalapplication?CurrDrug Targets.2013;14:177---91.

11.MillerJ,EdwardsLD,AgustíA,BakkeP,CalverleyPM,CelliB, etal.Comorbidity:systemicinflammationandoutcomesinthe ECLIPSEcohort.RespirMed.2013;107:1376---84.

12.CelliBR,LocantoreN,YatesJ,Tal-Singer R,MillerBE,Bakke P,etal.Inflammatorybiomarkersimproveclinicalpredictionof mortalityinchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease.AmJRespir CritCareMed.2012;185:1065---72.

13.Pinto-PlataV,CasanovaC,MüllerovaH,deTorresJP,Corado H, Varo N, et al. Inflammatory and repair serum biomarker pattern:associationtoclinicaloutcomesinCOPD.RespirRes. 2012;20:71.

14.Globalstrategyforthediagnosis,managementandprevention ofchoronicobstructivepulmonarydisease.Globalinitiativefor chronicobstructivelungdisease;2011.http://www.goldcopd. org/guidelines-global-strategy-for-diagnosis-management.html

[accessed04.04.12].

15.Brusasco V, Crapo R, Viegi G, American Thoracic Society, EuropeanRespiratorySociety.Coming together: the ATS/ERS consensusonclinicalpulmonaryfunctiontesting.EurRespirJ. 2005;26:1---2.

16.BestallJC,PaulEA,GarrodR,GarnhamR,JonesPW,Wedzicha JA.UsefulnessoftheMedicalResearchCouncil(MRC)dyspnoea scaleasameasureofdisabilityinpatientswithchronic obstruc-tivepulmonarydisease.Thorax.1999;54:581---6.

17.Yorgancıo˘gluA,PolatlıM,AydemirÖ,YılmazDemirciN,Kırkıl G,NaycıAtıs¸S,etal.ReliabilityandvalidityofTurkishversion ofCOPDassessmenttest.TuberkToraks.2012;60:314---20.

18.JonesPW,QuirkFH,BaveystockCM.TheStGeorge’sRespiratory Questionnaire.RespirMed.1991;85Suppl.B:25---31,discussion 33-7.

19.MuirK,GomeniR.Non-compartmentalanalysis.In:BonatePL, HowardDR, editors.Pharmacokinetics in drug development: clinicalstudydesign andanalysis. Arlington,VA: AAPSPress; 2004.p.235---66.

20.SariogluN, AlpaydinAO, CoskunAS, CelikP,OzyurtBC, Yor-ganciogluA.RelationshipbetweenBODEindex:qualityoflife andinflammatorycytokinesinCOPDpatients.MultidiscipRespir Med.2010;5(2):84---91.

21.GanWQ,ManSF,SenthilselvanA,SinDD.Associationbetween chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and systemic inflam-mation: a systematic review and a meta-analysis. Thorax. 2004;59:574---80.

22.Garcia-RioF,MiravitllesM,SorianoJB,Mu˜nozL,Duran-Tauleria E,SánchezG,etal.Systemicinflammationinchronic obstruc-tivepulmonarydisease:apopulation-basedstudy.RespirRes. 2010;11:63.

23.KolsumU,RoyK,StarkeyC,BorrillZ,TrumanN,VestboJ,etal. Therepeatabilityofinterleukin-6,tumornecrosisfactor-alpha, andC-reactive proteininCOPDpatientsover oneyear.IntJ ChronObstructPulmonDis.2009;4:149---56.

24.HanMK,MuellerovaH,Curran-EverettD,DransfieldMT,Washko GR,ReganEA,etal.GOLD2011diseaseseverityclassification inCOPDGene:aprospectivecohortstudy.LancetRespirMed. 2013;1:43---50.

25.KimS,OhJ,KimYI,BanHJ,KwonYS,OhIJ,etal.Differencesin classificationofCOPDgroupusingCOPDassessmenttest(CAT) ormodifiedMedicalResearchCouncil(mMRC)dyspneascores: across-sectionalanalyses.BMCPulmMed.2013;13:35.

26.Rieger-ReyesC,García-TiradoFJ,Rubio-GalánFJ,Marín-Trigo JM. Classification of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease severity according to the new global initiative for chronic obstructivelungdisease2011guidelines:COPDassessmenttest versus modified medical research council scale. Arch Bron-coneumol.2014;50:129---34.

(7)

27.Arostegui I, Esteban C, García-Gutierrez S, Bare M, Fernández-de-Larrea N, Briones E, et al. Subtypes of patientsexperiencingexacerbationsofCOPDandassociations withoutcomes.PLoSONE.2014;9:e98580,http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1371/journal.pone.0098580.

28.VarolY,OzacarR,BalciG,UstaL,TaymazZ.Assessingthe effec-tivenessoftheCOPDassessmenttest(CAT)toevaluateCOPD severityandexacerbationrates.COPD.2014;11:221---5.

29.Pothirat C, Chaiwong W, Limsukon A, Deesomchok A, Liws-risakun C, Bumroongkit C, et al. Detection of acute deteriorationin health status visit among COPD patients by

monitoringCOPDassessmenttestscore.IntJChronObstruct PulmonDis.2015;3:277---82.

30.PolatlıM,Yorgancıo˘gluA,AydemirÖ,YılmazDemirciN,Kırkıl G, Atıs¸Naycı S,et al.Validity andreliability ofTurkish ver-sionofSt.George’srespiratoryquestionnaire. TuberkToraks. 2013;61:81---7.

31.AgustíA,SolerJJ,MolinaJ,Mu˜nozMJ,García-LosaM,RosetM, etal.IstheCATquestionnairesensitivetochangesinhealth status in patients with severe COPD exacerbations? COPD. 2012;9:492---8.

Referanslar

Benzer Belgeler

In other words, it would be possible to iden- tify general stress levels and driver’s angry thoughts and these can be used during the trainings designed with consideration

The construction work will have to go on on this spot regardless of weather conditions. a) Hava koullarina uygun olarak, bu noktada ina çahmasmm sürdürulmesi gerekebilir. b)

In our study, among bronchiectasis patients who pre- sented at the outpatient clinic, the NLR value was lower in the eosinophilic group than in the non-eosinophilic group, which

included never smokers without respiratory symp- toms, second group current smokers without respira- tory symtoms and the third group with a diagnosis of chronic bronchitis, COPD

Asthma COPD and Asthma-COPD Overlap Syndrome (ACOS) Based on the Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention and the Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management

An increase in intra-alveolar pressure due to bronchospasms or cough may provoke rupture of some alveoli, with ensuing pneumomediastinum resulting in air crossing the

It remains unclear whether malnutrition contri- butes to impaired pulmonary functions through a loss of respiratory muscle mass, or if advan- ced disease, increased work of breath

Based on our observations in COPD patients admitted to our respiratory intensive care unit (RICU), which were about 70% of total admissi- ons during a four-year period, suggesting