• Sonuç bulunamadı

Diversity and novelty in information retrieval

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Diversity and novelty in information retrieval"

Copied!
1
0
0

Yükleniyor.... (view fulltext now)

Tam metin

(1)

Diversity and Novelty in Information Retrieval

Rodrygo L. T. Santos

Univ. Federal de Minas Gerais Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil

rodrygo@dcc.ufmg.br

Pablo Castells

Univ. Autónoma de Madrid Madrid, Spain

pablo.castells@uam.es

Ismail Sengor Altingovde

Middle East Technical University Ankara, Turkey

altingovde@ceng.metu.edu.tr

Fazli Can

Bilkent University Ankara, Turkey

canf@cs.bilkent.edu.tr

ABSTRACT

This tutorial aims to provide a unifying account of current research on diversity and novelty in different IR domains, namely, in the context of search engines, recommender sys-tems, and data streams.

Categories and Subject Descriptors

H.3.3 [Information Storage and Retrieval]: Information Search and Retrieval—search process

Keywords

Relevance, Diversity, Novelty, Ambiguity, Redundancy

1.

OVERVIEW

Information retrieval has been traditionally approached as a pursuit of relevant information, under the assumption that the users’ information needs are unambiguously conveyed by their information requests. While such an assumption may have arguably held in the library setting where the early studies of relevance-oriented ranking were conducted, it does not hold in general, and it is unlikely to hold in particular for the multitude of users’ needs in modern information retrieval systems, such as search engines and recommender systems. In order to identify relevant information under the uncer-tainty posed by the users’ requests, an effective approach is to diversify the retrieved results. By doing so, an IR sys-tem can minimise the chance of wrongly guessing the users’ needs, which may cause the users to abandon their retrieval task.

Through a stream of active research and experiences, di-versity and novelty can be said to have by now consolidated into a significant body of techniques, methodologies, the-ories, and knowledge in the field of information retrieval. This tutorial aims to provide a unifying account of current research on diversity and novelty in different IR domains. In

Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the owner/author(s).

Copyright is held by the owner/author(s).

SIGIR’13,July 28–August 1, 2013, Dublin, Ireland. ACM 978-1-4503-2034-4/13/07.

particular, we will cover the motivations, as well as the most established approaches for producing and evaluating diverse results in the context of search engines, recommender sys-tems, and data streams. By contrasting the state-of the-art in these multiple domains, this tutorial aims to derive a common understanding of the diversification problem and the existing solutions, their commonalities and differences, as a means to foster new research directions.

In particular, the tutorial attendees will:

• understand the importance and complexities of achiev-ing diversity/novelty for various IR domains;

• learn the state-of-the-art approaches for diversity/novelty in search results, documents and streaming data, and recommender systems;

• learn the fundamental evaluation metrics and have an overview of past and current evaluation campaigns • get an overview of other related application areas that

include query suggestions, image search, aggregated search, spatial object retrieval;

• obtain a unified view of the topic as a take-away mes-sage; i.e., the connections between various methods employed in different domains as well as the differences between them.

2.

TUTORIAL OUTLINE

1. Practical and Theoretical Background 2. Diversity in Search

• Implicit and Explicit Diversification Approaches • Diversity Evaluation

3. Diversity in Recommendation • Problem Statement

• Novelty and Diversity Enhancement • Novelty and Diversity Evaluation 4. Diversity in Documents and Streams

• Document-level Novelty

• Novelty and Diversification of Document Streams • Evaluation

5. Other Application Areas

Referanslar

Benzer Belgeler

Hıfzı Veldet Velidedeoğİu için, evinin bulunduğu Göztepe’de bir tören düzenlenerek, buradaki caddenin adı ‘Hıfzı Veldet Velidedeoğlu’ olarak değiştirildi..

Keten helvacılar vardı mesela, güzel, çok güzel beyitleri vardı, hepsi takvimlerin arkasında kaldı. Tabii ki bir de destancılar

The urban renewal project being undertaken in Tarlabaşı, Istanbul proclaims itself to be honoring the history of the neighborhood’s late Ottoman “multicultural”

Ulusal Dermatoloji Kongresi Gaziantep 9-13 Ekim 2012 www.ulusaldermatoloji2012.org A’dan Z’ye Dermokozmetik Uygulamalar Kursu, İstanbul 24-25 Kasım 2012

Diese Politik konnte jedoch aus verschiedenen Grunden nicht vollstandig umgesetzt werden: Obwohl sich die Tiirkei an den humanitiiren Hilfslieferungen fiir Armenien beteiligte,

dence between states, and intemational cooperation.' The "Melian Dialogue," which is one of the most frequently commented upon parts of Thucydides' History, presents the

Şekil 4.1’de GSBL pozitif Klebsiella pneumoniae genomik DNA’sı kullanılarak yapılan Touch Down PCR ürünlerinin % 1 lik agaroz jel elektroforezi sonrası

A second constituent of the contemporary forms of populist rhetoric is the growing resentment against the European Union, which is perceived by the affiliates of populism as one of