w w w . j m r t . c o m . b r
Availableonlineatwww.sciencedirect.com
Original
Article
Highly
efficient
photocatalytic
performance
of
Cu
2
O@TiO
2
nanocomposite:
influence
of
various
inorganic
oxidants
and
inorganic
anions
Wagih
A.
Sadik
a,
Abdel-Ghaffar
M.
El-Demerdash
a,
Adel
W.
Nashed
a,
Amr
A.
Mostafa
a,
Hesham
A.
Hamad
b,∗aMaterialsScienceDepartment,InstituteofGraduateStudiesandResearch(IGSR),AlexandriaUniversity,Alexandria,Egypt
bFabricationTechnologyDepartment,AdvancedTechnologyandNewMaterialsResearchInstitute(ATNMRI),CityofScientificResearch
andTechnologicalApplications(SRTA-City),NewBorgEl-ArabCity,21934,Alexandria,Egypt
a
r
t
i
c
l
e
i
n
f
o
Articlehistory:
Received15August2019 Accepted3September2019 Availableonline26September2019
Keywords:
Photocatalyticoxidation Cu2O@TiO2nanocomposite
Inorganicoxidants AR8dyedegradation Electricalenergyperorder.
a
b
s
t
r
a
c
t
ThisworkoffersthefacilesynthesisofCu2O@TiO2nanocompositesbysolidstatereaction
towardstheeliminationofAcid-Red8(AR8)dyeasatargetpollutantmodelthroughthe photocatalyticoxidationsystem.Anothergoalistoassessthecapacityofvariousinorganic oxidantsthatactasalternativeelectronacceptorforCu2O@TiO2mediatedphotocatalytic
oxidation.Thepreparednanocompositewasanalyzedbyvariousanalysisinstruments,and theirphotocatalyticperformancewassystemicallyassessedwithrespecttotheremovalof AR8dye.Uponirradiation,comparedtopureCu2OandpureTiO2alone,theCu2O@TiO2has
exhibitedahigherphotocatalyticperformancewhichshowthatthecombiningTiO2(n-type)
withCu2O(p-type)hasbeenimprovedtheelectronmobilityandsubsequentlydecreasing
therateofelectron-holerecombination.Akineticstudyisconfirmedthatthedegradation ofAR8hasbeenobeyedthepseudo-first-ordermodel.Theperfectionofthephotocatalytic activityisachievedbyusingvariousinorganicoxidantssuchas;H2O2,Na2S2O8andNaIO4
soastoproduceanelectronscavenger.Also,theapparentrateconstant(kapp)and
appar-entquantumyield(Qapp)arehigherforalloxidantsthanwithoutoxidants,whileislower
intermsofelectricalenergyperorder(EEO)andhalf-lifetime(t0.5).Periodateionhas
con-sideredthemostefficientoxidantwhencomparedwithotheroxidantsforenhancingthe photocatalyticactivityviatheformationofvariousreactiveoxygenspecies.Thedegradation efficiencyofthesecatalyticsystemscouldbearrangedinanascendingorder:Cu2O@TiO2/
NaIO4>Cu2O@TiO2/Na2S2O8>Cu2O@TiO2/H2O2>Cu2O>TiO2.
©2019TheAuthors.PublishedbyElsevierB.V.Thisisanopenaccessarticleunderthe CCBY-NC-NDlicense(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
∗ Correspondingauthor.
E-mail:heshamaterials@hotmail.com(H.A.Hamad).
1.
Introduction
Recently, the shortage of water is becoming more severe problemduetoanenvironmentalpollution,rapidindustrial growth,uncontrolledgroundwaterprogressandreducingthe water resources. Hence, the fixing of these problems and
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.09.007
2238-7854/©2019 The Authors. Publishedby Elsevier B.V. This isan open access articleunder the CC BY-NC-ND license (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
theprogressivegrowthofthewaterpollution.Amongthem, heterogeneousphotocatalysisisesteemedamotivating tech-niquewithtoday’schallengingdemandsespeciallyforclean watertechnology[11,12].
Nanostructured TiO2 is considered as a well-known
photocatalystforthehighlyefficientperformancefor decom-positionoftextilepollutantsinwater[13].Thedestructionof organicpollutantsbytitaniainthepresenceofsuitablelight isasaresultofproductionofhydroxylradical,verystrong oxidant,thatarethekeyofusingthephotocatalystfor oxi-dationoforganic molecules.Also,there weremany efforts forimprovingthephotocatalyticactivitybycombinationwith otheroxidants[14].Greatchallengeshavebeenmadeinorder toimprovetheperformanceoftitania,mainlyjointwithother semiconductor,regardlesstheexcellentprospectofefficient photocatalyticmineralizationoftoxicdyesinwater[15].
Sensitizationofn-typesuchas;TiO2withp-typesuchas;
Cu2OisaneffectivepathforfabricationTiO2based
photocata-lystwithextendedabsorptionandsubsequentlyimprovedthe photocatalyticactivity.ThisisduetothelowbandgapofCu2O
(E0=1.9–2.2eV)andtheformationofheterostructurebetween
TiO2andCu2Othathelpstheseparationandtransportation
ofthephoto inducedchargecarriersinCu2O@TiO2
hetero-junctionnanocomposite,andhencedeclinestheopportunity ofrecombinationandimprovesthephotocatalyticproperties
[16].Also,thesynergisticeffectbetweenTiO2andCu2Oisvery
importantforimprovingthechargeseparationandleadsto muchhigherphotocatalyticactivitythanpureTiO2andCu2O
[17,18].
Manyresearchgroupsconcerned withthefabricationof Cu2O@TiO2inordertomakeaprogressinthedestructionof
organiccontaminantsfromwater.Thephotocatalyticactivity ofTiO2/zeolite(TZ)wasimprovedthephotocatalytic
degrada-tionofbisphenolA(BPA)byaddingCu2O[19].Mixedoxidesof
Cu2O-TiO2wassynthesizedonacoppersubstratefor
reduc-tionof2,2,4,4-tetrabromodiphenylether(BDE47) [20]. Also, themorphologyissignificantfactorforenhancingthe pho-tocatalytic activity. The Cu2O/TiO2 heterostructure hollow
spheres(Cu2O/TiO2HS)forremovalofRhodamineBasaresult
ofdesigntheheterojunctionbetweenTiO2andCu2O[21].The
degradationofreactiveblue49(RB49)dyeisobservedbyusing 4wt.%Cu2O-CuO/TiO2catalyst[22].
Todate,thereisnostudies concerningthevarious inor-ganic oxidants using Cu2O@TiO2 as a photocatalyst for
destructionoftoxicdyesinanaqueoussolution.Herein,itisin
Germany. CuCl2.2H2O, NaOH and glucose were purchased
fromAldrichchemicals,Germany.AcidRed8(AR8)(anionic dye) with molecular formula C18H14N2Na2O7S2, molecular
weight of 480.42g/mol, and max 508nm was purchased
from Fluka, Germany. All oxidants such as sodium perio-date(NaIO4),hydrogenperoxide(H2O2,30%w/v),andsodium
persulphate (Na2S2O8)wereobtainedfromFisherScientific,
Germany.
2.2. SynthesisofCu2OandCu2O@TiO2
NanoCu2Owasfabricatedbyco-precipitationmethod.Cu2O
@TiO2nanocompositewaspreparedbytwosteps;oneby
syn-thesisofCu2Onanoparticles,followedbyaddingit(10wt.%of
Cu2O)toDegussaP-25(90wt.%ofTiO2)forsynthesisofCu2O
@TiO2bysolidstatereaction.Thepowdershavebeenmixed
uniformlyandformedfinepowderbygrinding2h.The resul-tantpowdershavebeencalcinedat500◦Cfor3hinamuffle furnace.Theoverallprocedureforsynthesisofnanocomposite ispresentedinFig.1.
2.3. Physicochemicalcharacterization
The physicochemical properties of the synthesized Cu2O
@TiO2 nanocomposite was observed by scanning electron
microscope (SEM,JEOL,ModelJSM-6360 LA,Japan)[Priorto the investigation,the sampleswere coatedwithgoldusing sputteringcoater(model:S150B,EdwardsHighVacuumLtd., England)], and joint it with EnergyDispersive X-ray (EDX), X–raydiffraction(XRD,Bruker,D8ADVACE,Germany)[Cu(K␣) radiations of wavelength (=1.5406A◦) generated at 40Kv, 40mA], and Fourier Transform Infrared spectrophotometer (FTIR,Shimadzu-8400,Japan)[IRspectraweretakenfromthe testsamples,pressedintoKBr-supporteddiscsandscanned inthewavelengthrangefrom400to4000cm−1.
2.4. Evaluationofthephotocatalyticactivity
ThephotocatalyticperformanceofthepreparedCu2O@TiO2
nanocompositewasusedtoevaluatetheremovalefficiency ofAR8 dyeinan aqueoussolution usingbatchslurry pho-toreactor.Thecontents(TiO2/dye,Cu2O/dye,Cu2O@TiO2/dye
andCu2O@TiO2/dye/oxidant)oftheglasscontainerwere
agi-tated bya magneticstirrer and kept purged with air(rate 3000mlmin−1).Thedyesolutionwasagitatedwith
photocat-Fig.1–SchematicdiagramforsynthesisofCu2O@TiO2nanocomposites.
alystforadsorptionat30minbeforeirradiationwithUVto obtainequilibriumadsorption.
Irradiation was done with a tubular low-pressure mer-curylampwithpower43Wandwavelength254nm(Voltarc Tubes Inc.,USA). The total intensity reaching the solution wasestimated4mWcm−2.ThecolordisappearingofAR8dye wasanalyzedspectrophotometricallyatitsmaximum absorp-tionwavelengthof508nm,usingShimadzu model1601PC doublebeamspectrophotometer,Japan.Samplescontaining Cu2O@TiO2weretakenperiodicallyfromthephotoreactorand
measuredafterfiltrationusing0.2mpolyethersulfone mem-brane. The efficiency of the photocatalytic activity can be estimatedinEq.(1).
%Degradation=[Co–C]/Co×100%=[Ao–A]/Ao×100% (1) Where Co=initialconcentration of dyesolution (mg/L), C=concentrationofdyesolutionafterphotoirradiation(mg/L) attimet(minute).Aoisthevalueofabsorbanceofdye aque-oussolutionafteradsorptioninthedark,andAisthevalueof absorbanceofdyeaqueoussolutionafterreaction.
3.
Results
and
discussion
3.1. FormationpathwayofCu2O@TiO2nanocomposite
In this work, Cu2O@TiO2 nanocomposite was prepared by
two steps. Cu2O nanoparticles were firstly prepared using
co-precipitationmethod,andthenCu2Onanoparticleswere
depositedontheinsideandoutsidesurfaceofTiO2by
solid-statereaction,yieldingtheCu2O@TiO2nanocomposite(Fig.1).
Firstly,Cu2+ ionsand solventwerefirstlymixedtoform
bluesolution.Then,theadditionofNaOHandglucosethat supportsthereductionofCu2+toCu+ ions.Theadditionof
glucoseduringthesynthesisofCu2Oassociatestoreducethe
rateofagglomerationandalsoimprovethehomogeneityand thedistributionofthisparticleswithsmallgrainsize[23].After increasethetemperaturefromroomtemperatureto70◦C,a largenumberofCu2Owereformedatshorttime.Secondly,
Cu2OwasaddedtoDegussaP-25,theionsofCu+maybe
dif-fusedandadsorbedonthesurfaceofTiO2aswellasabsorbed
intotheinterstitialspaceinTiO2athighcalcination
tempera-ture,yieldingCu2O@TiO2nanocompositebecauseTiO2isused
asasubstratewithassociatedoflowamountofCu2O(10wt.%)
[19,24].
3.2. CharacterizationofCu2O@TiO2nanocomposite
Fig.2(a)showstheSEMofthepreparedCu2O@TiO2
nanocom-positewithhighhomogeneityanduniformityofaggregated semi-sphericalshape.Theaveragediameterofgrainsizeof 56nm.TheEDXofthepreparedCu2O@TiO2nanocomposite
statedthattheexistenceofconsiderableamountsofCu,Ti, andOwhichconfirmedthatthesuccessfulfabricationofhigh purityofCu2O@TiO2nanocompositewerenoticedbythe
exis-tenceofthedistinctiveenergypeaksforTiandCuwithoutany impurities(Fig.2b).ThespectrumshowsthestrongTisignal atabout4.5eVandaweaksignalatabout0.45eVwithatomic percentageof39.25%.Also,aweaksignalatabout0.45eVfor oxygenwasdetectedwithatomicpercentageof48.52%.The twoweaksignalsatabout0.94and 8.04eVforcopperwere detectedwithatomicpercentageof12.23%.
Fig. 2 (c) shows the XRD pattern of the fabricated Cu2O@TiO2 nanocomposite which displays the diffraction
peaksat2=25.23,27.31,35.42,36.02,37.82,38.66,47.97,48.73, 54.04,55.05and62.61,whichmatchtoanataseandrutile tita-nia(JCPDScardNo021-1272and021–1276),respectivelyand also purecubic Cu2O (JCPDS99-0041)[25,26]. Comparedto
DegussaP-25TiO2,Cu2O@TiO2nanocompositehasthree
addi-tionalXRDpeaksthatlocatedat36.02,62.61,and73.54which fitstothe(111),(220)and(311)andascribedtocupritephaseas wellasstatedthatCu2Oarereallyfoundontothesurfaceof
theP25TiO2[16].ItisindicatedthatthecombinationofCu2O
inthecrystalstructureofTiO2 whichhasnotanyeffecton
thestructureofDegussaP-25andthisstructureispreserved. Thesefindingsaredemonstratedthatatwo-phase composi-tionofTiO2andCu2OexistintheCu2O@TiO2heterostructure.
TheFTIRspectrumofCu2O@TiO2nanocomposite(Fig.2d)
showsabandat3471cm−1,whichisdistinctiveofthe non-hydrogen bonded surface hydroxyl groups. Also, the peak observedat1638cm1isascribedtothebendingmodeofthe
Fig.2–(a)SEM,(b)EDX,(c)XRD,and(d)FT-IRofCu2O@TiO2nanocomposite.[A:anatase,R:rutile,andC:cuprite].
inorganicCu Ohasbeendetectedat378cm−1whereasthe representativebandoftheinorganicTi Ohasbeenobserved at587cm−1[16].
3.3. Photocatalysisofacidred8dye 3.3.1. Degradationkinetics
Thedecomposition kineticsofAR8 dyebyTiO2, Cu2O,and
its composite Cu2O@TiO2 were assessed by following the
Langmuir-Hinshelwoodmodel[11].Whenthechemical con-centrationCoismillimolarsolutiontheintegratedformofEq.
(2)beanapparentfirstorderequation.
ln(Co/C)=kappt (2)
Where,kapprepresentstheapparentfirstorderrateconstant,
CoandCareconcentrationbeforeandphotocatalyticreaction,
respectively.Thehalf-lifetime(t0.5)ofthefirstorderreaction isthetimerequiredforthereactantstobedegradedtothehalf oftheirCo.Therelationshipbetweent0.5andkappisgivenby
Eq.(3).
t0.5=0.693/kapp (3)
3.3.2. ComparisonbetweenTiO2,Cu2Oanditscomposite Cu2O@TiO2
The decomposition ofAR8 dye asan organic contaminant modelhasbeenachievedbyphotocatalyticperformanceusing TiO2P-25,Cu2OanditsurfacemodifiedCu2O@TiO2
nanocom-positeasphotocatalystsatroomtemperature.Thedestruction ofAR8dyewasassessedbyreducingtheCoatmax508nmdue
totheazobond(N N).TheAR8dyewascompletelydegraded ataround90minwithobeyedthepseudo-first-orderkinetic models (Figure not shown). In Table 1, the decomposition rate followsthe orderCu2O@TiO2>Cu2O>TiO2.Therateof
removalbypureCu2OwashigherthanthatofpureTiO2which
maybeduetothelowbandgapofCu2O.Themosteffective
catalyticsystemisobtainedbyusingcombined Cu2O@TiO2
systemwhichcanbeascribedtothemoreefficientseparation ofphotoinducedelectron-hole(e−/h+)pairs,andalsoimprove
thesurface-activesitesincomposite[17,20,29].
3.3.3. Influenceofvariousoxidationprocessesonthe degradationbyadditionofelectronacceptors
One of the significant drawbacks of the photocatalysis is the electron-hole recombination which signifies the major energy-wasting step and subsequently leads to the reduc-tionofthequantumyield.So,thedeferringofelectron-hole recombinationbyadditionofirreversibleelectronacceptorsin
Table1–Collectivedataofapparentrateconstants,half-lifetimes,andreactionordersfordegradationofAR8dye[conc. ofcatalyst0.1g/l].
Catalyticsystem Concentrationof oxidant(M)
kapp(min−1) t0.5(min) Apparent
reactionorder(n) UV/Cu2O – 124×10−4 5.6 – UV/TiO2 84.0×10−4 8.3 UV/Cu2O@TiO2 150×10−4 4.6 UV/Cu2O@TiO2/H2O2 2×10−3 182×10−4 3.8 0.4 4×10−3 278×10−4 2.5 12×10−3 375×10−4 1.8 14×10−2 531×10−4 1.3 28×10−2 1257×10−4 0.6 45×10−2 1834×10−4 0.4 UV/Cu2O@TiO2/S2O82− 1×10−3 302×10−4 2.3 1.2 2×10−3 455×10−4 1.5 4×10−3 983×10−4 0.7 UO 8×10−3 3651×10−4 0.2 1.2
UV/Cu2O@TiO2/IO4− 4.0×10−5 1297×10−4 0.50 0.2
7.4×10−4 2001×10−4 0.30 1.0×10−3 2846×10−4 0.20 21×10−3 3664×10−4 0.18 48×10−3 4881×10−4 0.14 11×10−2 7229×10−4 0.10
ordertoincreasetherateofphotocatalysis,especiallyinhigh concentrationoftoxicdyes.Theobserveddrastically accel-eratedthe decompositionwere attributedtotheimproving theelectronscavengingfromtheaddedinorganicoxidants. Themeritsofadditionofelectronacceptorsistoavoidthe recombinationvia (i) increasethe number oftrapped elec-trons; (ii) generation of more radicals and other oxidizing species;(iii)increasingtheoxidationrateofthe intermedi-atecompoundsand(iv)avoidingtheproblemsoflowoxygen concentration[28–30].Hence,variousconcentrationsof oxi-dants(H2O2,Na2S2O8andNaIO4)wereaddedtotheAR8dye
solutioninthepresenceofthecombinedCu2O@TiO2system
thatillustrated inFig. 3.Theintroduction ofinorganic oxi-dantsisutilizedforenhancingtherateofdegradationofAR8 dyethroughbetterscavengetheejectedelectronsofTiO2and
hencethesurvivaltimeh+ atCu
2Owillbehigherand
sub-sequentlyreacts effectivelywithAR8dye.Theeffectofthe concentrationofvariousoxidantsisdescribedwellasfollow;
(a)H2O2
TheUV/Cu2O@TiO2/H2O2systemisusedtotrapthe
elec-tronsatconductionbandandformationofmore䊉OHradicals from generation for superoxide anion radicals (䊉O2−) and
homolyticcleavageofbondsoftwohydroxylgroupsduring the photolysis,which enhancing therate ofphotocatalytic reaction.H2O2isusedasanelectronacceptorthanoxygenin
othermechanismsandsubsequentlytherateof recombina-tionwilldecrease[11].Also,H2O2ismoreelectropositivethan
O2 thatresultfromtwohydrogen atomsbondedtooxygen
atoms(H O O H).
Todeepthe illustrationofintotheeffectivereactivityof H2O2/Cu2O@TiO2 systemonthedecompositionofAR8dye
was studiedatvarious concentration ofH2O2 inFig. 3 (a).
Ithasbeenstatedthattheenhancedphoto-destructionrate withincreasingthedoseofH2O2.Also,thekappwasincreased
from182×10−4to1834×10−4min−1whentheconcentration ofH2O2wasrangedfrom2×10−3to45×10−2M(Table1).The
effectofratedeterminingspeciesisexpressedbyapowerlaw relation
kapp=K[H2O2]n (4)
WherekappandKaretheapparentandthetruerate
con-stants,respectively.Thenistheorderofthephotocatalytic reaction.FromFig.3(b),thevalueofnwas0.4(Table1).The rateofAR8dyedegradationusingUV/Cu2O@TiO2/H2O2
sys-temisbetterwhencomparedtoUV/Cu2O@TiO2alone.This
maybeascribedto(i)trapofthephotogeneratedconduction bandelectronsofCu2O@TiO2byH2O2,whichismoreefficient
thantrappingbyO2,accordingtothefollowingreaction[31].
H2O2+e−(cb)→−OH+䊉OH (5)
(ii) generate other oxidizing species (䊉OH), which can contributetotheoxidativedecayprocess;and(iii)after illu-mination,substantialphotolysisoftheH2O2wouldproduce
morehydroxylradicals(Eq.6)[32].
H2O2+h→2䊉OH (6)
Insummary,theincreasingtheH2O2concentrationsleads
to an increase in both electron scavenging action, and hydroxylradicals,whichoxidizethedyeandleadtoahigher rateofdecomposition.
(b)PeroxydisulphateionsS2O82−
Fig.3(c)displaysthe influenceofaddingS2O82− to
com-bined Cu2O@TiO2 system onthe destruction ofAR8dye.It
wasfoundthattherateofremovalwasenhancedwiththe addition of a low concentration of the S2O82− (1×10−3M)
to UV/Cu2O@TiO2 system. Accordingto afirst-order model
for dye destruction, it has been found that the enhanced photodegradationrateisresultfromtheincreasingthe con-centration of S2O82−. Also, the kapp was increased from
Fig.3–(a,c,e)Changeofln(C/Co)withtimeatdifferentconcentrationsofH2O2,S2O82−,andIO4−,respectively,and(b,d,f)
Table2–Collectivedataofapparentrateconstants,electricalenergyperorderandapparentquantumyieldfor degradationofacidred8dye[conc.ofcatalyst0.1g/l].
Catalyticsystem Concentrationof oxidant(M)
kapp(min−1) EEO(kWh/m3) Qapp%
(mol/Einstein) UV/Cu2O – 124×10−4 526.3 1.07 UV/TiO2 84.0×10−4 769.2 0.73 UV/Cu2O@TiO2 150×10−4 333.3 1.3 UV/Cu2O@TiO2/H2O2 2×10−3 182×10−4 357.1 1.58 4×10−3 278×10−4 238.1 2.41 12×10−3 375×10−4 175.4 3.25 14×10−2 531×10−4 125 4.60 28×10−2 1257×10−4 52.6 11.0 45×10−2 1834×10−4 36 16.0 UV/Cu2O@TiO2/S2O82− 1×10−3 302×10−4 217.4 2.62 2×10−3 455×10−4 145 4.0 4×10−3 983×10−4 67.1 8.52 UV/CuO@TiO/SO 8×10−3 3651×10−4 18.1 31.6 UV/Cu2O@TiO2/IO4− 4.0×10−6 1297×10−4 51 11.2
7.4×10−4 2001×10−4 33 17.3 1.0×10−3 2846×10−4 23.2 24.7 21×10−3 3664×10−4 18.1 31.8 48×10−3 4881×10−4 13.5 42.3 11×10−2 7229×10−4 9.1 62.7
S2O82−wasrangedfrom1×10−3to8×10−3M(Table1).The
completedecompositionofthedyeinashorttime(20min)at conc.8×10−3MofS2O82−.Therateorder ofphotocatalytic
reaction withrespect toS2O82−, which was obtainedfrom
Fig.3(d),wasfoundtobe1.2(Table1).
TheadditionofS2O82−ionscouldhaveincreasedthe
pho-tocatalyticperformanceduetotheinteractionwithlightand its interaction with Cu2O@TiO2. The photolysis of
persul-fateleadstotheformationofsulphateradicalswhoseredox potential 2.5–3.1V/NHE is higher than that of S2O82− ions
(1.96V/NHE) [32]. TheS2O82− anionscan traptheelectrons
thatformedfromtheconduction bandofCu2O@TiO2 more
thantheelectronsfromO2,andthus formedotheroxidant
SO4䊉−(Eq.7)[33]
S2O82−+e−(cb)→SO42−+SO4䊉− (7)
Uponirradiation,theSO4•−isalsogeneratedandcan
con-tributeinthephotocatalyticreactionwithwaterforformation of•OH,accordingtoEqs.(8and9).
S2O82−+h→2SO4䊉− (8)
SO4䊉−+H2O→䊉OH+SO42−+H+ (9)
So, the increased concentrations of the S2O82− have
increasedthetrappingoftheelectronsfromtheconduction bandsofCu2O@TiO2andtheproductionofSO4䊉− and䊉OH.
Thesetwofactorsareresponsibleforhigherrateof photode-compositionofAR8dye.
(c)PeriodateionIO4−
Oxyhalogenshaveatomofoxygen and anotheratomof halogen as a central atom. The difference in polarization between oxygen and halogen leads to the capturing the ejectedelectron.Theeffectofoxyhalogensystemisextremely based on the differences in the electronegativity and the atomicradiusofthehalogen[34].Theelectropositive
halo-genoxidantisusedasastrongerelectronscavengerviathe generationofhVB+andformationof䊉OH.
Theincreasingoftheatomicradiusleadstothedecreasing oftheelectronegativitythatresultfromcapturingtheejected electronbyhalogen.Hence,theatomicradiusofIhashigher thanthatofClorBrandithasmorebondedwithoxygenthan ClorBr,and theabilityofelectronsoverphotocatalystwill behigher.So,theUV/Cu2O@TiO2/IO4䊉isthebestsystemfor
decompositionofAR8dyebytheoxyhalogenoxidant.
Fig. 3(e) showstheinfluenceofaddition ofvarious con-centration of periodate ions to UV/Cu2O@TiO2 system on
the destruction of AR8 dye.The addition ofvery low con-centrationsofIO4−(4.0×10−5M)toCu2O@TiO2hasresulted
in a higher decomposition rate than UV/Cu2O@TiO2 only.
Also,whenincreasingtheconcentrationoftheperiodateto (11×10−2M)hasresultedindyedestructionaftertheshortest time(18min).AccordingtotheIO4−,Thereactionrateorder
is0.2(Fig.3(f)andTable1).Thescavengingoftheelectronsby Cu2O@TiO2/IO4−systemleadstotheimprovementofthe
pho-tocatalyticdecompositionofAR8dye,whichismoreefficient thantrappingwithO2orS2O82−asfollows[35];
IO4−+8e−(cb)+8H+→4H2O+I− (10)
Also,uponirradiation,thephotolyticdecompositionofthe IO4−,involvestheformationofanumberofhighlyreactive
radical-andnon-radicalintermediates(IO3䊉,䊉OH,O䊉− and
IO4䊉)(Eqs.11–13)asfollows[35].
IO4−+h→IO3䊉+O•− (11)
O䊉−+H+↔䊉OH (12)
䊉OH +IO4−→OH−+IO4䊉 (13)
Theseintermediatesareresponsiblefortheenhancingthe decompositionoforganiccompounds[32].Increasingthe
con-teredandnotabsorbedbythedyesolution.Theredoesnot usuallyexistanypossibilitytodetermineexperimentallythe amount oflightabsorbed bythe photocatalyst. Inorder to bypassthe difficultyofdeterminingquantum yieldsin het-erogeneousphotocatalysis,anotherparameteroftenreported istheapparentquantumyield(Qapp)whichdefinedasshown
inEq.(14)[36,37]
Apparentquantumyield(Qapp,mol/Einstein)= Rateof
disappearanceofreactantmolecules/Rateofincident photonsinsidereactorcell=kappCo/I (14)
Wherekappistheapparentfirst-orderrateconstant,Cois
theinitialdyeconcentrationandIisthetotalintensityof inci-dentphotonsenteringthereactorcell.Itwasobservedfrom
Table2thatQappforUV/Cu2O@TiO2/IO4-systemishigherthan
those for UV/Cu2O@TiO2/H2O2 and UV/Cu2O@TiO2/S2O82−
systems. This may be due to the higher activity of perio-datewhencomparedtohydrogenperoxideandpersulfateas obtainedinthepreviousstudies[33,36].
3.3.5. Figureofmerit
Nowadays,theeconomicstudyofeachprocessisasignificant factorwhichitincludesthemajorfractionofoperatingcost. Hence,itisnecessarytostudytheelectricalenergy consump-tionoftheAOPsunderexperimentalconditions.Theelectrical energyperorder(EEO)isaninformativefactorforthe
photo-catalyticdegradationbecauseitobeysthefirstorderkinetic model[6].ThefiguresofmeritEEOallowsforarapid
deter-minationoftheelectricalenergycostandtheyindicatethe totalpowerrequired.Forcomparativepurpose,thetreatment efficienciesforthedifferentprocessesareevaluatedthrough the EEO values. The EEO is defined as the number of kWh
ofelectricalenergyrequiredtoreducetheconcentrationof pollutantbyoneorderofmagnitude(90%)in1m3of
contami-natedwater.Consideringfirst-orderdegradationkinetics,the UVdoseswerecalculatedforallAOPSusingEq.(15)[38].From theUVdoses,thesimplestformoftheestimationofEEOcan
alsobecalculatedusingEq.(16)[37].
UVDose=[Lamppower(kW)×Time(h)×1000]
/[Treatedvolume(L)] (15)
Fig.4–Changeoflog(Co/C)withUVdosefordegradation ofAR8dyeusing0.1gmofCu2O@TiO2withdifferent
concentrationsof(a)H2O2,(b)S2O82−,and(c)IO4−,
EEO= UVDose/[Log(Co/C)] (16)
FromEq.(16),theEEOvalueswereobtainedfromtheinverse
oftheslopeofaplotoflog(Co/C)versusUVdose(Fig.4).Itwas
foundthatthefigure-of-meritEEOisappropriateforestimating
theelectricalenergyefficiency.Itisnotonlyprovingthe reduc-tionintheneededelectricitybythephotocatalyticsystem,but alsoofferingtheconsiderableinfluenceoftheUVdoseonthe EEOintheprocess.TheEEOvalueswerefoundtobe
depen-dentontheconcentrationofH2O2,S2O82−,andIO4-.Also,the
EEO valuesofadditionaloxidants toUV/Cu2O@TiO2 system
islowerthan thatblankUV/Cu2O@TiO2 systemwhich
indi-catethatthelowerenergyconsumptionisduetothegreater appliedpotential and generation ofhighly reactive radical speciesatthehigherpotential.TheEEOvaluesshowthatthe
additionofperiodateexhibitedalsoalowenergyconsumption comparedtoperoxideandpersulfate(Table2).Insummary, thesefindingscanbeappliedfordesigningphotocatalytic sys-temwithlessconsumptionofelectricalenergy,higherrate constantandloweroperationcost.
3.3.6. Comparisonbetweenvariousoxidants
This study has presented that the three oxidants, perox-ide, persulfate and periodate, have enhanced the rate of UV-induced decomposition of AR8 dye in the presence of combined Cu2O@TiO2 system. This enhancement is as a
resultofthescavengingtheactivespeciesradicals,suchas hydroxyl radicals, and holes by the inorganic ions [29]. It can be seen that the addition of very low concentrations IO4− to Cu2O@TiO2 has resulted in a higher
decompo-sition rate than UV/Cu2O@TiO2, UV/Cu2O@TiO2/H2O2 and
UV/Cu2O@TiO2/S2O82−, thus indicating the effectiveness of
IO4−overH2O2andS2O82−asaresultofhigherofkapp,shorter
t0.5,higherQ
app,and lowerEEO.Thehighlyreactive radical
speciesinperiodate may directlyabstract H from AR8 dye molecules.So,theirradiatedIO4−solutioncanquicklyoxidize
theAR8molecules[39].
4.
Conclusions
In summary, we revealed that the facile and proficient approachfor the fabrication ofCu2O@TiO2 nanocomposite
via a solid-state approach. The formation ofthis compos-itewasrevealedbySEM-EDX,XRDandFT-IR.Thecombined Cu2O@TiO2 heterojunction system exhibited much higher
photocatalyticactivitythan thatofpristineCu2OandTiO2.
This is due to the transfer ofelectrons from Cu2O to the
conductionbandofTiO2isconcurrentlywiththe
photogen-eratedholes atthe valencebandofCu2O,whichfacilitates
theelectronandholeseparationandimprovesthe photocat-alyticactivityofCu2O@TiO2heterojunctionnanocomposite.
Itwas found that the heterogeneousphotocatalytic degra-dation, under UV illumination, using the following order: Cu2O@TiO2/NaIO4>Cu2O@TiO2/Na2S2O8>Cu2O@TiO2/H2O2
>Cu2O>TiO2.Thephotocatalyticactivityenhancementwas
attributedto the various reactive oxygen species like 䊉OH andIO4䊉.Thehigherdecolorizationandquantumefficiency
andlowerenergyperorderandenergyconsumptionof com-binedCu2O@TiO2systemwithoxidantsthanbareCu2O@TiO2.
ThecombinationofCu2O@TiO2nanocompositewithvarious
oxidantsmaybringanewinsightintohighlyefficient photo-catalyticapplicationsinthefuture.
Conflicts
of
interest
Theauthorsdeclarenoconflictsofinterest.
r
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
s
[1]LiY,WangP,HuangC,YaoW,WuQ,XuQ.Synthesisand photocatalyticactivityofultrafineAg3PO4nanoparticleson oxygenvacatedTiO2.ApplCatalBEnviron2017;205:489–97.
[2]LuoY,HuangJ.Hierarchical-structured
anatase-titania/cellulosecompositesheetwithhigh photocatalyticperformanceandantibacterialactivity.Chem EurJ2015;21:2568–75.
[3]OturanMA,AaronJJ.Advancedoxidationprocessesin water/wastewatertreatment:principlesandapplications.A review.CritRevEnvironSciTechnol2014;44:2577–641.
[4]ShalabyT,HamadH,IbrahimE,MahmoudO,Al-OufyA. Electrospunnanofibershybridcompositesmembranesfor highlyefficientantibacterialactivity.EcotoxicolEnvironSafe 2018;162:354–64.
[5]LauY-Y,WongY-S,TengT-T,MoradN,RafatullahM,Ong S-A.Coagulation-flocculationofazodyeAcidOrange7with greenrefinedlateritesoil.ChemEngJ2014;246:383–90.
[6]HamadH,BassyouniD,El-AshtoukhyE,AminN,El-LatifMA. Electrocatalyticdegradationandminimizationofspecific energyconsumptionofsyntheticazodyefromwastewater byanodicoxidationprocesswithanemphasisonenhancing economicefficiencyandreactionmechanism.Ecotoxicol EnvironSafe2018;148:501–12.
[7]El-AshtoukhyE-SZ,AminNK,El-LatifMMA,BassyouniDG, HamadHA.Newinsightsintotheanodicoxidationand electrocoagulationusingaselfgasstirredreactor:a comparativestudyforsyntheticC.IReactiveViolet2 wastewater.JCleanProd2017;167:432–46.
[8]YangK,YuJ,GuoQ,WangC,YangM,ZhangY,etal. Comparisonofmicropollutants’removalperformance betweenpre-ozonationandpost-ozonationusingapilot study.WaterRes2017;111:147–53.
[9]CuiY,LiuX-Y,ChungT-S,WeberM,StaudtC,MaletzkoC. Removaloforganicmicro-pollutants(phenol,anilineand nitrobenzene)viaforwardosmosis(FO)process:evaluation ofFOasanalternativemethodtoreverseosmosis(RO). WaterRes2016;91:104–14.
[10]ElkadyM,ShokryH,HamadH.Microwave-assistedsynthesis ofmagnetichydroxyapatiteforremovalofheavymetals fromgroundwater.ChemEngTechnol2018;41:553–62.
[11]HamadH,Bailón-GarcíaE,Maldonado-HódarFJ, Pérez-CadenasAF,Carrasco-MarínF,Morales-TorresS. SynthesisofTixOynanocrystalsinmildsynthesisconditions forthedegradationofpollutantsundersolarlight.Appl CatalBEnviron2019;241:385–92.
[12]HamadHA,SadikWA,AbdEl-latifMM,KashyoutAB,Feteha MY.Photocatalyticparametersandkineticstudyfor degradationofdichlorophenol-indophenol(DCPIP)dyeusing highlyactivemesoporousTiO2nanoparticles.JEnvironSci 2016;43:26–39.
[13]FujishimaA,RaoTN,TrykDA.Titaniumdioxide photocatalysis.JPhotochemPhotobiolC:PhotochemRev 2000;1:1–21.
2013;117:23848–57.
[18]FeiX,LiF,CaoL,JiaG,ZhangM.Adsorptionand photocatalyticperformanceofcuprousoxide/titania compositeinthedegradationofacidredB.MaterSci SemicondProcess2015;33:9–15.
[19]Ch-YKuo,Ch-HWu,LinaH-Y.SynergisticeffectsofTiO2and Cu2OinUV/TiO2/zeolite-basedsystemsonphotodegradation ofbisphenolA.EnvironTechnol2014;15:1851–7.
[20]HuZ,WangX,DongH,ShLi,LiX,LiL.Efficient
photocatalyticdegradationoftetrabromodiphenylethers andsimultaneoushydrogenproductionbyTiO2-Cu2O compositefilmsinN2atmosphere:influencingfactors, kineticsandmechanism.JHazardMater2017;340: 1–15.
[21]YinH,WangX,WangL,NieQ,ZhangYY,WuW.Cu2O/TiO2 heterostructuredhollowspherewithenhancedvisiblelight photocatalyticactivity.MaterResBull2015;72:176–83.
[22]AjmalA,MajeedI,MalikRN,IqbalM,NadeemMA,HussainI, etal.Photocatalyticdegradationoftextiledyeson
Cu2O-CuO/TiO2anatasepowders.JEnvironChemEng 2016;4:2138–46.
[23]Luevano-HipolitoE,Torres-MartınezLM,Sanchez-Martınez D,CruzMRA.Cu2Oprecipitation-assistedwithultrasound andmicrowaveradiationforphotocatalytichydrogen production.IntJHydrogEnergy2017;42:12997–3010.
[24]WangY,TaoJ,WangX,WangZ,ZhangM,HeG,etal.A uniqueCu2O/TiO2nanocompositewithenhanced photocatalyticperformanceundervisiblelightirradiation. CeramInt2017;43:4866–72.
[25]HamadH,El-latifMA,KashyoutA,SadikW,FetehaM. Optimizingthepreparationparametersofmesoporous nanocrystallinetitaniaanditsphotocatalyticactivityin water:physicalpropertiesandgrowthmechanisms.Process SafEnvironProt2015;98:390–8.
[26]WangX,DongH,HuZ,QiZ,LiL.Fabricationofa Cu2O/Au/TiO2compositefilmforefficientphotocatalytic hydrogenproductionfromaqueoussolutionofmethanol andglucose.MaterSciEngB2017;219:10–9.
variouswatermatrixcomponents.JPhotochemPhotobiolA: Chem2017;345:80–91.
[31]DougnaAA,GombertB,KodomT,Djaneye-BoundjouG, BoukariSOB,LeitnerNKV,etal.Photocatalyticremovalof phenolusingtitaniumdioxidedepositedondifferent substrates:effectofinorganicoxidants.JPhotochem PhotobiolA:Chem2015;305:67–77.
[32]NguyenAT,JuangR-SH.Photocatalyticdegradationof p-chlorophenolbyhybridH2O2andTiO2inaqueous suspensionsunderUVirradiation.JEnvironManage 2015;147:271–7.
[33]SadikWA.Effectofinorganicoxidantsin
photodecolourizationofanazodye.JPhotochemPhotobiol A:Chem2007;191:132–7.
[34]YunE-T,YooH-Y,KimW,KimH-E,KangG,LeeH,etal. Visible-light-inducedactivationofperiodatethatmimics dye-sensitizationofTiO2:simultaneousdecolorizationof dyesandproductionofoxidizingradicals.ApplCatalB Environ2017;203:475–84.
[35]ChenM,ChuW.Photo-oxidationofanendocrinedisrupting chemicalochloroanilinewiththeassistanceofTiO2and iodate:reactionparametersandkineticmodels.ChemEngJ 2014;248:273–9.
[36]IrmakS,KusvuranE,ErbaturO.Degradationof 4-chloro-2-methylphenolinaqueoussolutionbyUV irradiationinthepresenceoftitaniumdioxide.ApplCatalB Environ2004;54:85–91.
[37]DaneshvarN,AleboyehA,KhataeeAR.Theevaluationof electricalenergyperorder(EE/O)forphotooxidative decolorizationoffourtextiledyesolutionsbythekinetic model.Chemosphere2005;59:761–7.
[38]LamS-M,SinJ-C,AbdullahAZ,MohamedAR.Photocatalytic degradationofresorcinol,anendocrinedisrupter,byTiO2 andZnOsuspensions.EnvironTechnol2013;34:1097–106.
[39]QamarM,SaquibM,MuneerM.Photocatalyticdegradation oftwoselecteddyederivatives,chromotrope2Bandamido black10B,inaqueoussuspensionsoftitaniumdioxide.Dyes Pigm2005;65:1–9.