5 To a high degree 4 3 2 1 Not at all Cannot say a) Scientific merit
b) Project management and the Project group c) Implementation plan and resource parameters d) National cooperation
e) International cooperation
f) Dissemination and communication of results g) Relevance relative to the call for proposals
5 To a high degree 4 3 2 1 Not at all Cannot remember/Cannot say
a) Scientific merit
b) Project management and the Project group c) Implementation plan and resource parameters d) National cooperation
e) International cooperation
f) Dissemination and communication of results g) Relevance relative to the call for proposals
Better About the same Poorer Not relevant/Cannot say
In terms of covering the aspects that are important to assess In tems of only including important aspects
In terms of being easy to understand for the reviewers In terms of being easy to use for the reviewers RCN Reviewer Survey
Researcher Projects
The standard review form for RCN Researcher projects asks for assessments on seven criteria. For each of them, please indicate your assessment of its importance and clarity.
2. Importance: I think this is an important criterion when assessing Researcher projects.
3. Clarity: I think the RCN guidelines for this criterion are clear/easy to understand.
4. When comparing the RCN criteria for Researcher projects to those used for assessing similar applications in other funding agencies you know, are the RCN criteria better, about the same or poorer:
NB: Leave open if you do not have experiences from assessing similar applications for other funding agencies.
5. Comments: Please give your comments concerning your overall experience with the criteria and guidelines for reviewing proposals for RCN Researcher projects and possible areas for improvement.
Back Next
Powered by Opinio Survey Software
5 To a high degree 4 3 2 1 Not at all Cannot say a) Level of research
b) Scientific merit
c) The project manager and project group d) Implementation plan and resource parameters
5 To a high degree 4 3 2 1 Not at all Cannot remember/Cannot say
a) Level of research b) Scientific merit
c) The project manager and project group d) Implementation plan and resource parameters
Better About the same Poorer Not relevant/Cannot say
In terms of covering the aspects that are important to assess In tems of only including important aspects
In terms of being easy to understand for the reviewers In terms of being easy to use for the reviewers RCN Reviewer Survey
Knowledgebuilding Project for Industry (KPN)
The standard review form for RCN Knowledgebuilding Project for Industry asks for assessments on four criteria. For each of them, please indicate your assessment of its importance and clarity.
6. Importance: I think this is an important criterion when assessing KPN proposals.
7. Clarity: I think the RCN guidelines for this criterion are clear/easy to understand.
8. When comparing the RCN criteria for KPN projects to those used for assessing similar applications in other funding agencies you know, are the RCN criteria better, about the same or poorer:
NB: Leave open if you do not have experiences from assessing similar applications for other funding agencies.
9. Comments: Please give your comments concerning your overall experience with the criteria and guidelines for reviewing proposals for KPN projects and possible areas for improvement.
Back Next
Powered by Opinio Survey Software
5 To a high degree 4 3 2 1 Not at all Cannot say a) Level of innovation
b) Potential for value creation for industrial partners c) Realisation of the innovation
d) Level of research e) R&D project quality f) Implementation capacity
5 To a high degree 4 3 2 1 Not at all Cannot remember/Cannot say
a) Level of innovation
b) Potential for value creation for industrial partners c) Realisation of the innovation
d) Level of research e) R&D project quality f) Implementation capacity
Better About the same Poorer Not relevant/Cannot say
In terms of covering the aspects that are important to assess In tems of only including important aspects
In terms of being easy to understand for the reviewers In terms of being easy to use for the reviewers RCN Reviewer Survey
Innovation Projects for the Industrial Sector (IPN)
The standard review form for RCN Innovation Projects for the Industrial Sector asks for assessments on six criteria. For each of them, please indicate your assessment of its importance and clarity.
10. Importance: I think this is an important criterion when assessing IPN proposals.
The criteria in Norwegian:
Level of innovation Innovasjonsgrad
Potential for value creation for industrial partners Verdiskapingspotensial for bedriftspartnere Realisation of the innovation Realisering av innovasjonen
Level of research Forskningsgrad
R&D project quality Prosjektkvalitet for FoUprosjektet Implementation capacity Gjennomføringsevne
11. Clarity: I think the RCN guidelines for this criterion are clear/easy to understand.
12. When comparing the RCN criteria for IPN projects to those used for assessing similar applications in other funding agencies you know, are the RCN criteria better, about the same or poorer:
NB: Leave open if you do not have experiences from assessing similar applications for other funding agencies.
13. Comments: Please give your comments concerning your overall experience with the criteria and guidelines for reviewing proposals for IPN projects and possible areas for improvement.
Back Next
Powered by Opinio Survey Software
Select age Select gender RCN Reviewer Survey
Background information 14. Please indicate your age and gender.
15. Please indicate your sector of employment.
University/Higher education institution Independent research institute Industry/Private enterprise Public administration Other (including NGOs)
16. Please indicate your field of research/expertise.
Natural sciences
Engineering and technology Medical sciences
Agricultural sciences Social sciences Humanities Others
17. Please indicate your current country of residence.
Norway
Nordic country, apart from Norway (Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Sweden) Europe, apart from the Nordic countries
Outside Europe
Back Send
Powered by Opinio Survey Software