Kimlik Statüleri YaklaĢımı

Com os resultados obtidos, dentro das limitações do estudo, pôde-se concluir que: 1- As peças confeccionadas por CAD/CAM em zircônia apresentaram uma maior

desadaptação marginal vertical do que aquelas fabricadas em cobalto-cromo com a mesma metodologia. Porém, a tensão gerada aos implantes foi semelhante.

2- A tecnologia CAD/CAM foi mais precisa do que a técnica convencional de fabricação de infraestruturas parafusadas sobre pilares protéticos, tanto em relação ao desajuste marginal, quanto à tensão gerada aos implantes.

45

REFERÊNCIAS

ABDUO, J. et al. Assessing the fit of implant fixed prostheses: a critical review. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants, v. 25, n. 3, p. 506-515, 2010.

ABDUO, J.; SWAIN, M. Influence of vertical misfit of titanium and zirconia frameworks on peri-implant strain. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants, v. 27, n. 3, p. 529-536, 2012.

ASSUNCAO, W. G. et al. Biomechanics studies in dentistry: bioengineering applied in oral implantology. J. Craniofac. Surg., v. 20, n. 4, p. 1173-1177, 2009.

BERNARDES, S. R. et al. Photoelastic analysis of stress patterns from different implant- abutment interfaces. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants, v. 24, n. 5, p. 781-789, 2009.

BERNARDES, S. R. et al. Tecnologia CAD/CAM aplicada a prótese dentária e sobre implantes: o que é, como funciona, vantagens e limitações. Revisão crítica da literatura. Jornal ILAPEO, v. 6, n. 1, p. 8-13, 2012.

BEUER, F.; SCHWEIGER, J.; EDELHOFF, D. CAD-CAM in dentistry new materials and technologies. Dentistry, v. 2, n. 4, 2010. Disponível em:

<http://www.dentistryindia.in/_layout/pdf/CAD-

CAM%20in%20Dentistry%20New%20Materials%20and%20Technologies.pdf>. Aceso em: 19 jun. 2014.

BROGGINI, N. et al. Persistent acute inflammation at the implant-abutment interface. J. Dent. Res., v. 82, n. 3, p. 232-237, 2003.

BURGUETE, R. L. et al. Tightening characteristics for screwed joints in osseointegrated dental implants. J. Prosthet. Dent., v. 71, n. 6, p. 592-599, 1994.

CUNHA, T. M. A. et al. Comparison of fit accuracy between Procera custom abutments and three implant. Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res., v. 14, n. 5, p. 772-777, 2012.

DAVIDOWITZ, G.; KOTICK, P. G. The use of CAD/CAM in dentistry. Dent. Clin. North Am., v. 55, n. 3, p. 559-570, 2011.

DEDAVID, B. A.; GOMES C. I.; MACHADO, G. Microscopia eletrônica de varredura: aplicações e preparação de amostras: materiais poliméricos, metálicos e semicondutores. Porta Alegre: EDIPUCRS, 2007.

DRAGO, C. J.; PETERSON, T. Treatment of an edentulous patient with CAD/CAM technology: a clinical report. J. Prosthodont., v. 16, n. 3, p. 200-208, 2007.

FUSTER-TORRES, M. A. et al. CAD/CAM dental systems in implant dentistry: update. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal, v. 14, n. 3, p. E141-145, 2009.

HAMMERLE, C. H. et al. Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regardingcomputer-assisted implant dentistry. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants, v. 24, p. 126-131, 2009. Suplemento.

HEBEL, K. S.; GAJJAR, R. C. Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: achieving optimal occlusion and esthetics in implant dentistry. J. Prosthet. Dent., v. 77, n. 1, p. 28-35, 1997.

HJALMARSSON, L. et al. Precision of fit to implants: a comparison of Cresco™ and Procera® implant. Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res., v. 12, n. 4, p. 271-280, 2010.

HOLMES, J. R. et al. Considerations in measurement of marginal fit. J. Prosthet. Dent., v. 62, n. 4, p. 405-408, 1989.

HURSON, S. Laboratory techniques to prevent screw loosening on dental implants. J. Dent. Technol., v. 13, n. 3, p. 30-37, 1996.

JEMT, T.; LIE, A. Accuracy of implant-supported prostheses in the edentulous jaw: analysis of precision of fit between cast gold-alloy frameworks and master casts by means of a three- dimensional photogrammetric technique. Clin. Oral Implants Res., v. 6, n. 3, p. 172-180, 1995.

KAPOS, T. et al. Computer-aided design and computer-assisted manufacturing in prosthetic implant dentistry. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants, v. 24, p. 110-117, 2009. Suplemento.

KARL, M.; HOLST, S. Strain development of screw-retained implant-supported fixed restorations: procera implant bridge versus conventionally cast restorations. Int. J. Prosthodont., v. 25, n. 2, p. 166-169, 2012.

KATSOULIS, J. et al. Precision of fit of implant-supported screw-retained 10-unit computer- aided-designed and computer-aided-manufactured frameworks made from zirconium dioxide and titanium: an in vitro study. Clin. Oral Implants Res., v. 25, n. 2, p. 165-174, 2014.

KAYATT, F. E.; NEVES, F. D. Aplicação dos sistemas CAD/CAM na odontologia restauradora. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier, 2013.

LEE, M. Y. et al. Comparative study on stress distribution around internal tapered connection implants according to fit of cement- and screw-retained prostheses. J. Adv. Prosthodont., v. 5, n. 3, p. 312-318, 2013.

LIU, P. R. A panorama of dental CAD/CAM restorative systems. Compend. Contin. Educ. Dent., v. 26, n. 7, p. 507-508, 2005.

MARKARIAN, R. A. et al. Stress distribution after installation of fixed frameworks with marginal gaps over angled and parallel implants: a photoelastic analysis. J. Prosthodont., v. 16, n. 2, p. 117-122, 2007.

MICHALAKIS, K. X.; HIRAYAMA, H.; GAREFIS, P. D. Cement-retained versus screw- retained implant restorations: a critical review. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants, v. 18, n. 5, p. 719-728, 2003.

47

MILLINGTON, N. D.; LEUNG, T. Inaccurate fit of implant superstructures. Part 1: stresses generated on the superstructure relative to the size of fit discrepancy. Int. J. Prosthodont., v. 8, n. 6, p. 511-516, 1995.

MIYAZAKI, T. et al. A review of dental CAD/CAM: current status and future perspectives from 20 years of experience. Dent. Mater. J., v. 28, n. 1, p. 44-56, 2009.

MÖRMANN, W. H. The evolution of the CEREC system. J. Am. Dent. Assoc., v. 137, p. 7s- 13s, 2006. Suplemento.

MULCAHY, C. et al. Measurement of misfit at the implant-prosthesis interface: an experimental method using a coordinate measuring machine. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants, v. 15, n. 1, p. 111-118, 2000.

NAVES, M. D. et al. The influence of interproximal contact on implant-supported fixed partial dentures in the posterior jaw - a photoelastic analysis. J. Oral Implantol., 2013. No prelo.

NEODENT. Neoshape: sistema CAD/CAM. Curitiba: Neodent. Disponível em: <http://www.neodent.com.br>. Acesso em: 19 jun. 2014.

NOBEL BIOCARE. Nobel Procera CAD/CAM. Disponível em: <https://www.nobelbiocare.com>. Acesso em: 19 jun. 2014.

OH, G. J. et al. Sintering behavior and mechanical properties of zirconia compacts fabricated by uniaxial press forming. J. Adv. Prosthodont., v. 2, n. 3, p. 81-87, 2010.

PERSSON, A. et al. A three-dimensional evaluation of a laser scanner and a touch-probe scanner. J. Prosthet. Dent., v. 95, n. 3, p. 194-200, 2006.

PESUN, I. J. Intrusion of teeth in the combination implant-to-natural-tooth fixed partial denture: a review of the theories. J. Prosthodont., v. 6, n. 4, p. 268-277, 1997.

ROCHA, P. V.; FREITAS, M. A.; CUNHA, T. M. A. Influence of screw access on the retention of cement-retained implant prostheses. J. Prosthet. Dent., v. 109, n. 4, p. 264-268, 2013.

SAHIN, S.; CEHRELI, M. C. The significance of passive framework fit in implant prosthodontics: current status. Implant Dent., v. 10, n. 2, p. 85-92, 2001.

SIERRAALTA, M. et al. Precision of fit of titanium and cast implant frameworks using a new matching. Int. J. Dent., v. 2012, ident. 374315, 2012.

SIRONA. Sistemas CAD/CAM: soluções para o consultório e o laboratório. Disponível em: <http://www.sirona.com.br/cerec.php>. Acesso em: 19 jun. 2014.

TAKAHASHI, T.; GUNNE, J. Fit of implant frameworks: an in vitro comparison between two fabrication techniques. J. Prosthet. Dent., v. 89, n. 3, p. 256-260, 2003.

TAYLOR, T. D. Prosthodontic problems and limitations associated with osseointegration. J. Prosthet. Dent., v. 79, n. 1, p. 74-78, 1998.

TORRES, E. M. et al. Correlation between vertical misfits and stresses transmitted to implants from metal frameworks. J. Biomech., v. 44, n. 9, p. 1735-1739, 2011.

TORSELLO, F. et al. Evaluation of the marginal precision of one-piece complete arch titanium. Clin. Oral Implants Res., v. 19, n. 8, p. 772-779, 2008.

WATANABE, F. et al. Analysis of stress distribution in a screw-retained implant prosthesis. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants, v. 15, n. 2, p. 209-218, 2000.

WEE, A. G.; AQUILINO, S. A.; SCHNEIDER, R. L. Strategies to achieve fit in implant prosthodontics: a review of the literature. Int. J. Prosthodont., v. 12, n. 2, p. 167-178, 1999.

ZAGHLOUL, H. H.; YOUNIS, J. F. Marginal fit of implant-supported all-ceramic zirconia frameworks. J. Oral Implantol., 2012. No prelo.