Etkileşimci ve Dönüşümcü Liderlik (Transaksiyonel ve Transformasyonel)

entre os indivíduos tratados com avanço único ou seqüencial.

6.3.2 Os incisivos inferiores apresentaram vestibularização e intrusão relativa maior nos indivíduos tratados com avanço único, 11,50 graus e 2,08 mm, do que com avanço seqüencial, 4,13 graus e 0,51mm, de forma significante.

6 REFERÊNCIAS *

1. Aidar LAA, Abrahão M, Yamashita HK, Dominguez GC. Herbst appliance therapy and temporomandibular joint disc position: a prospective longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006;129: 486-96.

2. Almeida MR, Henriques JFC, Almeida RR, Ursi W, McNamara Jr. JA. Short-Term treatment effects produced by the Herbst appliance in the mixed dentition. Angle Orthod. 2005; 75: 540–7.

3. Angle EH. Treatment of malocclusion of the teeth. 7th ed. Philadelphia: SS White Manufacturing; 1907.

4. Antonini A, Marinelli A, Baroni G, Franchi L, Defraia E. Class II malocclusion with maxillary protrusion from the deciduous through the mixed dentition. Angle Orthod. 2004; 75: 980-6.

5. Arnett GW, Bergman RT. Facial keys to orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning-part II. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.1993; 103: 395-411.

* De acordo com o estilo Vancouver. Disponível em: http://www.nlm.nih.gov/bsd/uniform_requiments.html

6. Ast DB, Carlos JP, Cons DC. The prevalence and characteristics of malocclusion among senior high school students in upstate New York. Am J Orthod. 1965; 51: 437-45.

7. Barnett GA, Higgins DW, Major PW, Flores-Mir C. Immediate skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of the crown- or banded type Herbst appliance on class II division 1 malocclusion a systematic review. Angle Orthod. 2008; 78: 361-9. Disponível em: http://www.angle.org/anglonline/? request=get- document&issn=0003-3219&volume=078&issue=02&page=0361

8. Baumrind S. The role of clinical research in orthodontics. Angle Orthod. 1993; 63: 235-40.

9. Bishara SE. Mandibular changes in persons with untreated and treated Class II Division 1 malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.1998; 113: 661-73.

10. Björk A. Variations in the growth pattern of the human mandible: longitudinal radiographic study by the implant method. J Dent Res. 1963; 42: 400–11.

11. Björk A, Skieller V. Facial development and tooth eruption. An implant study at the age of pubertal. Am J Orthod. 1972; 62: 339–83.

12. Bock N, Pancherz H. Herbst treatment of class II division 1 malocclusions in retrognathic and prognathic facial types a cephalometric long-term retrospective study. Angle Orthod. 2008; 76: 930-40.

13. Bremen JV, Pancherz H, Ruf S. Reduced mandibular casts splints – an alternative in Herbst therapy? A prospective multicentre study. Eur J Orthod. 2007. Disponível em: http://ejo.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/search?fulltext=herbst+cast+&x=14&y=11

14. Burgersdijk R, Truin GJ, Frankenmolen F, Kalsbeek H, Van't Hof M, Mulder J. Malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need of 15-74-year-old Dutch adults. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1991; 19: 64-7.

15. Buschang PH, Gandini LG. Mandibular skeletal growth and modelling between 10 and 15 years of age. Eur J Orthod. 2002; 24: 69-79.

16. Buschang PH, Martins J. Childhood and adolescent changes of skeletal relationships. Angle Orthod. 1998; 68: 199-208.

17. Buschang PH, Santos-Pinto A. Condylar growth and glenóide fossa displacement during childhood and adolescence. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998; 113: 437-42.

18. Carter NE. Dentofacial changes in untreated class II division subjects. Br J Orthod.1987; 14: 225-34.

19. Chung C, Wong WW. Craniofacial growth in untreated skeletal Class II subjects: a longitudinal study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002; 122: 619-26.

20. Cozza P, Baccetti T, Franchi L, Toffol L, Mcnamara JA. Mandibular changes produced by functional appliances in Class II malocclusion: a systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006; 129: 599.e1- 599.e12.

21. Croft RS, Buschang PH, English JD, Meyer R. A cephalometric and tomographic evaluation of Herbst treatment in the mixed dentition. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.1999; 116: 435-43.

22. Dib LS. Avaliação cefalométrica das alterações dentárias e esqueléticas induzidas pelo uso do aparelho de Herbst no tratamento da má oclusão de classe II, divisão 1ª de angle – estudo longitudinal [dissertação mestrado]. Araraquara: Faculdade de Odontologia da UNESP; 2007.

23. Du X, Hägg U, Rabie ABM. Effects of headgear Herbst and mandibular step-by-step advancement versus conventional Herbst appliance and maximal jumping of the mandibule. Eur J Orthod. 2002; 24: 167-74.

24. Falck F, Fränkel R. Clinical relevance of step-by-step mandibular advancement in the treatment of mandibular retrusion using the Fränkel appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989; 96: 333-41.

25. Flores-Mir C, Ayeh A, Goswani A, Charkhandeh S. Skeletal and dental changes in Class II division 1 malocclusions treated with splint-type Herbst appliances. A systematic review. Angle Orthod. 2007; 77: 376-81.

26. Foucart JM, Pajoni D, Carpentier P, Pharaboz C. MRI study of temporomandibular joint disk behavior in children with hyperpropulsion appliances. Orthod Fr. 1998; 69: 79-91.

27. Franchi L, Baccetti T, McNamara JA Jr. Treatment and post-treatment effects of acrylic splint Herbst appliance therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999; 115: 429-38.

28. Gilmore WA. Morphology of the adult mandible in class II, division 1 malocclusion and in excellent occlusion. Angle Orthod. 1950; 20: 137-46.

29. Godinho J, Fishman L. Skeletal changes associated with the Herbst appliance based on skeletal maturation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007; 132: 128.

30. Greulich WW, Pyle SI. Radiographic atlas of skeletal development of the hand and wrist. California: Stanford University Press; 1959.

31. Hägg U, Pancherz H. Dentofacial orthopaedics in relation to chronological age, growth period and skeletal development. An analysis of 72 male patients with class II division 1 malocclusion treated with the Herbst appliance. Eur J Orthod. 1988; 10: 169-76.

32. Hansen K. Treatment and posttreatment effects of the Herbst appliance on the dental arches and arch relationships. Semin Orthod. 2003; 9: 67- 73.

33. Hansen K, Pancherz H. Long-term effects of Herbst treatment in relation to normal growth development: a cephalometric study. Eur J Orthod. 1992; 14: 285-95.

34. Hansen K, Pancherz H, Hägg U. Long-term effects of Herbst appliance in relation to the treatment growth period: a cephalometric study. Eur J Orthod. 1991; 13: 471-81.

35. Hellman M. Orthodontia – its origin, evolution and culmination as a specialty. Dental Cosmos. 1920; 62: 14-30.

36. Herbst E. Atlas mad Grundriss der Zahn/irztlichen Orthnpfidie. Mfinchen: J.F. Lehmann Verlag; 1910 apud Pancherz H. History, background, and development of the Herbst appliance. Semin Orthod. 2003; 9: 3-11.

37. Herbst E. Dreissigj/i, hrige EvPahrungen mit dem Retentions- Scharnier. Zahnfirztl Rundschau 1934:43:1515- 24, 1563-68, 1611-16 apud Pancherz, H. Treatment of class II malocclusion by jumping the bite with the Herbst appliance: a cephalometric investigation. Am J Orthod. 1979; 76: 423-42.

38. Herbst E. Thirty years experience with the retention joint (Herbst appliance). Toronto: University of Toronto; 1935 apud Moro A, Fuziy A, Freitas MR, Henriques JFC, Janson GRR. Descrição passo-a-passo do aparelho de Herbst com “Cantilever” (CBJ). JBO: J Bras Ortodon Ortop Facial. 2002; 7: 162-74.

39. Howe RP. The bonded Herbst appliance. J Clin Orthod.1982; 16: 663-7.

40. Howe RP. Updating the bonded Herbst appliance. J Clin Orthod.1983; 17: 122-4.

41. Howe RP. The acrylic-splint Herbst problem solving. J Clin Orthod.1984; 18: 497-501.

42. Howe RP, McNamara Jr. JA. Clinical management of the bonded Herbst appliance. J Clin Orthod.1983; 17: 456-63.

43. Jakobsson SO. Cefhalometric evaluation of treatment effect of class II division 1 malocclusions. Am J Orthod. 1967; 53: 446-57.

44. Konik M, Pancherz H, Hansen K. The mechanism of class II correction in the late Herbst treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1997; 112: 87- 91.

45. Krzpow AB, Lieberman MA, Modan M. Prevalence of malocclusion in young adults of various ethnic backgrounds in Israel. J Dent Res. 1975; 54: 605-8.

46. Lai M , McNamara Jr JA. An Evaluation of two-phase treatment With the Herbst appliance and preadjusted edgewise therapy. Semin Orthod. 1998; 4: 46-58.

47. Langford NM. The Herbst appliance. J Clin Orthod. 1981; 15: 558-64.

48. Langford NM. Updating fabrication of the Herbst appliance. J Clin Orthod. 1982;15:173-4.

49. Lima, IO. Estudo comparativo entre a medida Wits e o ângulo ANB, em jovens brasileiros leucodermas com oclusão normal e com classe II, Div. 1. Ortodontia. 1983; 16: 35-46.

50. Lux CJ, Raeth O, Burden D, Conradt C, Komposch G. Sagittal and vertical growth of the jaws in class II, division 1 and class II, division 2 malocclusions during prepubertal and pubertal development. J Orofac Orthop. 2004; 65: 290–311.

51. McNamara Jr JA. Components of class II malocclusion in children 8-10 years of age. Angle Orthod. 1981; 51: 177-202.

52. McNamara Jr JA, Bryan FA. Longterm mandibular adaptations to protrusive function: an experimental study in Macaca mulatta. Am J Orthod. 1987; 92: 98-108.

53. McNamara Jr JA, Howe RP. Clinical management of the acrylic Herbst appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.1988; 94: 142-9.

54. McNamara Jr JA , Howe RP, Dischinger TG. A comparison of the Herbst and Fränkel appliances in the treatment of class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990; 98: 134-44.

55. McNamara Jr JA, Peterson JE, Pancherz H . Histologic changes associated with the Herbst appliance in adult Rhesus Monkeys (macaca mulatta) Semin Orthod. 2003; 9: 26-40.

56. Mayes JH. The single-appointment preattached cantilever. Clin Impres. 1996; 5: 14-23.

57. Martins JCR, Sakima T. Considerações sobre o surto de crescimento puberal. Ortodontia. 1977; 10: 164-70.

58. Martins JCR, Sinimbú CMB, Dinelli TCS, Martins LPM, Raveli DB. Prevalência de má oclusão em pré-escolares de Araraquara: Relação da dentição decídua com hábitos e nível sócio-econômico. Rev Dent Press Ortodon Ortop Facial. 1998; 3: 35-43.

59. Martins RM. Estudo tridimensional da oclusão normal na população brasileira [dissertação mestrado]. Araraquara: Faculdade de Odontologia da UNESP; 2004.

60. Massler M, Frankel JM. Prevalence of malocclusion in children aged 14 to 18 years. Am J Orthod. 1951; 37: 751-68.

62. Moyers RE, Riolo ML, Guire KE, Wainright RL, Bookstein FL. Diferential diagnosis of class II malocclusions. Part 1. Facial types associated with Class II malocclusions. Am J Orthod. 1980; 78: 477-94.

63. Nelson B, Hägg U, Hansen K , Bendeus M A long-term follow-up study of class II malocclusion correction after treatment with class II elastics or fixed functional appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007; 132: 499-503.

64. Ngan PW, Byczek E, Scheick J. Longitudinal evaluation of growth changes in class II division 1 subjects. Semin Orthod. 1997; 3: 222-31.

65. Obijou C, Pancherz H. Herbst appliance treatment of class II, division 2 malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997; 112: 287-91.

66. Oliveira Jr. WM, Vigorito JW, Tuma CESN, CabraL LS, Maia SA, Maia DSP. Determinação dos valores cefalométricos de Wits em jovens amazonenses, com oclusão normal. Rev Dental Press Ortodon Ortop Facial. 2007; 12: 118-24.

67. Pancherz H. Treatment of class II malocclusion by jumping the bite with the Herbst appliance: a cephalometric investigation. Am J Orthod. 1979; 76: 423-42.

68. Pancherz H. The mechanism of class II correction in Herbst appliance treatment: a cephalometric investigation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1982; 82: 104-13.

69. Pancherz H. The Herbst appliance – its biologic effects and clinical uses. Am J Orthod. 1985; 87: 1-20.

70. Pancherz H. The effects, limitations, and long-term dentofacial adaptations to treatment with Herbst appliance. Semin Orthod. 1997; 3: 232-43.

71. Pancherz H. Entrevista. Rev Dental Press Ortodon Ortop Facial. 2000; 5: 1-3.

72. Pancherz H. History, background, and development of the Herbst appliance. Semin Orthod. 2003; 9: 3-11.

73. Pancherz H, Hägg U. Dentofacial orthopedics in relation to somatic maturation. An analysis of 70 consecutive cases with the Herbst appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1985; 88: 273-87.

74. Pancherz H, Hansen K. Occlusal changes during and after Herbst treatment: cephalometric investigation. Eur J Orthod.1986; 8: 215-28.

75. Pancherz H, Littmann C. Morphology and position of mandible in Herbst treatment. Cephalometric analysis of changes to end of growth period. Inf Orthod Kieferorthop. 1989; 21: 493-513.

76. Paulsen HU. Morphological changes of the TMJ condyles of 100 patients treated with the Herbst appliance in the period of puberty to adulthood: a long-term radiographic study. Eur J Orthod. 1997; 19: 657-68.

77. Paulsen HU, Karle A. Computer tomographic and radiographic changes in the temporomandibular joints of two young adults with occlusal asymmetry, treated with the Herbst appliance. Eur J Orthod. 2000; 22: 649-56.

78. Paulsen HU, Rabol A, Sorensen SS. Bone sintigraphy of human temporomandibular joints during Herbst treatment: a case report. Eur J Orthod. 1998; 20: 369-74.

79. Paulsen HU, Karle A, Bakke M, Hersink A. CT-scanning and radiographic analysis of temporomandibular joints and cephalometric analysis in a case of Herbst treatment in later puberty. Eur J Orthod. 1995;17:165-75.

80. Pollard LE, Mamandras AH. Male postpuberal facial growth in class II malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995; 108: 62-8.

81. Popowich K, Nebbe B, Major PW. Effect of Herbst treatment on temporomandibular joint morphology: a systematic literature review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;123: 388-94.

82. Proffit WR, Fields HW, Moray LJ. Prevalence of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need in the United States: estimates from the NHANES lll survey. Int J Adult Orthod Orthog Surg. 1998; 13: 97-106.

83. Ramos DSPL, Lima EM. A Longitudinal evaluation of the skeletal profile of treated and untreated skeletal class II Individuals. Angle Orthod. 2005; 75: 47–53.

84. Raveli DB, Chiavini PCR, Sampaio LP. Herbst esplintado metálico fundido modificado. Rev Assoc Paul Especial Ortod. 2003;1: 48-55.

85. Rego MVNN, Thiesen G, Marchioro EM, Silva Filho OG, Rizzatto SMD. Estudo cefalométrico do tratamento precoce da má oclusão de classe II, 1ª divisão, com o aparelho Herbst: alterações esqueléticas sagitais. Rev Dental Press Ortodon Ortop Facial. 2005; 10: 120-40.

86. Ruf S, Pancherz H. Temporomandibular joint growth adaptation in Herbst treatment : a prospective magnetic resonance imagin and cephalometric roentgenographic study. Eur J Orthod. 1998; 20: 375-88.

87. Ruf S, Pancherz H. Temporomandibular joint remodeling inadolescents and young adults during Herbst treatment: a prospectivelongitudinal magnetic resonance imaging and cephalometric radiographic investigation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.1999;115: 607-18.

88. Ruf S, Pancherz H. When is the ideal period for Herbst therapy-early or lete? Semin Orthod. 2003; 9: 47-56.

89. Ruf S, Pancherz H. Orthognathic surgery and dentofacial orthopedics in adult class II division 1 treatment: mandibular sagittal split osteotomy versus Herbst appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004; 126: 140-52.

90. Ruf S, Pancherz H. Herbst/multibracket appliance treatment of class II division 1 malocclusions in early and late adulthood. A prospective cephalometric study of consecutively treated subjects. Eur J Orthod. 2006; 8: 352–60.

91. Sayin MO, Türkkahraman H. Cephalometric evaluation of nongrowing females with skeletal and dental class II, division 1 malocclusion. Angle Orthod. 2005; 75: 656–60.

92. Silva Filho OG, Freitas SF, Cavassan AO. Prevalência de oclusão normal e má oclusão na dentadura mista em escolares da cidade de Bauru (São Paulo). Rev Paul Cir Dent. 1989; 43: 287-90.

93. Silva Filho OG, Ozawa TO, Ferrari FM, Aiello CA. Aparelho de Herbst – variação para uso na dentadura mista. Rev Dental Press Ortodon Ortop Facial. 2000; 5: 58-67.

94. Spalding P. Treatment of class II malocclusions. In: Bishara SE. Textbook of orthodontics. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2001. p. 324-72.

95. Tang ELK. The prevalence of malocclusion amongst Hong Kong male dental students. Br J Orthod, 1994; 21: 57-63.

96. Tulloch JF, Medland W, Tuncay OC. Methods used to evaluate growth modification in Class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990; 98: 340-7.

97. Tulloch JF, Phillips C, Proffit WR. Benefit or early class II treatment: progress report of a two-phase randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;113: 62-74.

98. Thilander B, Persson M, Adolfsson U. Roentgen–cephalometric standards for a Swedish population. A longitudinal study between the ages of 5 and 31 years. Eur J Orthod. 2005; 27: 370–89 .

99. Ursi W, McNamara J, Martins DR. Alteração clínica da face em crescimento: Uma comparação cefalométrica entre os aparelhos extrabucal cervical, Fränkel e Herbst, no tratamento das classes II. Rev Dental Press Ortodon Ortop Facial. 1999; 4: 77-108.

100. Valant JR, Sinclair PM. Treatment effects of the Herbst appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orhop. 1989; 95: 138-47.

101. Vigorito JW. Estudo comparativo de algumas características mandibulares em maloclusões de classe I e classe II divisão 1, de Angle. Rev Fac Odontol Univ São Paulo. 1973; 11: 75-82.

102. Voudouris JC, Woodside DG, Altuna G, Kuftinec MM, Angelopoulos G, Bourque PJ. Condyle-fossa modifications and muscle interactions during Herbst treatment, part 1. New technological methods Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003; 123: 604-13.

103. Voudouris JC, Woodside DG, Altuna G, Angelopoulos G, Bourque PJ, Lacouture CY, et al. Condyle-fossa modifications and muscle interactions

during Herbst treatment, Part 2. Results and conclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;124:13-29.

104. Weschler D, Pancherz H. Efficiency of three mandibular anchorage forms in Herbst treatment: a cephalometric investigation. Angle Orthod. 2005; 75: 23–7.

105. Wieslander L. Intensive treatment of severe class II malocclusion with a headgear-Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1984; 86: 1-13.

106. Wieslander L. Long-term effect of treatment with the headgear-Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition. Stability or relapse? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993; 104: 319-29.

107. Windmiller EC. The acrylic-splint Herbst appliance: a cephalometric evaluation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993;104: 73-84.

108. Woodside DG, Metaxas A, Altuna G. The influence of functional appliance therapy on glenoid fossa remodelling. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1987; 92: 181-98.

109. Woodside DG, Altuna G, Harvold E, Herbert M, Metaxas A. Primate experiments in malocclusion and bone induction. Am J Orthod 1983; 83: 460-8.

110. You ZH, Fishman LS, Rosenblum RE, Subtelny JD. Dentoalveolar changes related to mandibular forward growth in untreated class II persons. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orhop. 2001; 120: 598-607.