SPACE AND THEIR APPLICATION IN DECISION MAKING Tuğçe Aydın, Serdar Enginoğlu
Algorithm 12. iQYZ12 ?
6. CONCLUSIONS
Table 3 provides the ranking orders of the successful SDM methods. These ranking orders are obtained using Proposition 2.1. According to the table, iRM07a 𝐶 , iMBR01/2-based iRM07a 𝐶 , iRM07o 𝐶 , and iQYZ12 𝐶 generate the same ranking orders just as iMBR01/2-based iRM07o 𝐶 , iKWW11/2 𝜆 , 𝜆 , 𝑅 , and iNS11 do. Besides, iCD12/3 and iCD12/4 have the same ranking orders. Though the skills of sorting the noise removal filters of all the SDM methods in this table relatively differ, all indicate that ARmF, AWMF, and DAMF are the top three filters with the highest noise removal performance, respectively. Further, all the SDM methods show that BPDF has the lowest noise removal performance.
Table 3. Ranking orders of the successful SDM methods
Successful SDM Methods Ranking Orders
iRM07a 𝑪 BPDF ≺ DBAIN ≺ NAFSMF ≺ MDBUTMF ≺ DAMF ≺ AWMF ≺ ARmF iMBR01/2-based iRM07a 𝑪 BPDF ≺ DBAIN ≺ NAFSMF ≺ MDBUTMF ≺ DAMF ≺ AWMF ≺ ARmF iRM07o 𝑪 BPDF ≺ DBAIN ≺ NAFSMF ≺ MDBUTMF ≺ DAMF ≺ AWMF ≺ ARmF iMBR01/2-based iRM07o 𝑪 BPDF ≺ DBAIN ≺ MDBUTMF ≺ NAFSMF ≺ DAMF ≺ AWMF ≺ ARmF iKWW11/2 𝝀𝟏, 𝝀𝟐, 𝑹 BPDF ≺ DBAIN ≺ MDBUTMF ≺ NAFSMF ≺ DAMF ≺ AWMF ≺ ARmF
iNS11 BPDF ≺ DBAIN ≺ MDBUTMF ≺ NAFSMF ≺ DAMF ≺ AWMF ≺ ARmF
iCD12/3 BPDF ≺ MDBUTMF ≺ DBAIN ≺ NAFSMF ≺ DAMF ≺ AWMF ≺ ARmF
iCD12/4 BPDF ≺ MDBUTMF ≺ DBAIN ≺ NAFSMF ≺ DAMF ≺ AWMF ≺ ARmF
iQYZ12 𝑪 BPDF ≺ DBAIN ≺ NAFSMF ≺ MDBUTMF ≺ DAMF ≺ AWMF ≺ ARmF
3. Molodtsov, D., “Soft set theory-first results”. Computers Mathematics with Applications, 37(4-5), 1999, pp. 19-31.
4. Çağman, N., Çıtak, F., Enginoğlu, S., “Fuzzy parameterized fuzzy soft set theory and its applications”. Turkish Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 1(1), 2010, pp. 21-35.
5. Karaaslan, F., “Intuitionistic fuzzy parameterized intuitionistic fuzzy soft sets with applications in decision making”. Annals of Fuzzy Mathematics and Informatics, 11(4), 2016, pp. 607-619.
6. Enginoğlu, S., Çaǧman, N., “Fuzzy parameterized fuzzy soft matrices and their application in decision-making”. TWMS Journal of Applied and Engineering Mathematics, 10(4), 2020, pp. 1105-1115.
7. Enginoğlu, S., Arslan, B., “Intuitionistic fuzzy parameterized intuitionistic fuzzy soft matrices and their application in decision-making”. Computational and Applied Mathematics, 39, Article Number: 325, 2020, pp. 1-20.
8. Arslan, B., Aydın, T., Memiş, S., Enginoğlu, S., “Generalisations of SDM methods in fpfs-matrices space to render them operable in ifpifs-fpfs-matrices space and their application to performance ranking of the noise-removal filters”. Journal of New Theory, (36), 2021, pp.
88-116.
9. Arslan, B., Aydın, T., Memiş, S., Enginoğlu, S., “Soft decision-making methods employing multiple ifpifs-matrices and their application: A follow-up study”. Communicated.
10. Aydın, T., Enginoğlu, S., “A configuration of five of the soft decision-making methods via fuzzy parameterized fuzzy soft matrices and their application to a performance-based value assignment problem”. M. Kılıç, K. Özkan, M. Karaboyacı, K. Taşdelen, H. Kandemir, A.
Beram (Eds.), International Conferences on Science and Technology, Natural Science and Technology, 2019, pp. 56-67, Prizren, Kosovo.
11. Enginoğlu, S., Memiş, S., “A review on some soft decision-making methods”. M. Akgül, İ.
Yılmaz, A. İpek (Eds.), International Conference on Mathematical Studies and Applications, 2018, pp. 437-442, Karaman, Turkiye.
12. Enginoğlu, S., Memiş, S., “A configuration of some soft decision-making algorithms via fpfs-matrices”. Cumhuriyet Science Journal, 39(4), 2018, pp. 871-881.
13. Enginoğlu, S., Öngel, T., “Configurations of several soft decision-making methods to operate in fuzzy parameterized fuzzy soft matrices space”. Eskişehir Technical University Journal of Science and Technology A-Applied Sciences and Engineering, 21(1), 2020, pp.
58-71.
14. Enginoğlu, S., Memiş, S., “A review on an application of fuzzy soft set in multicriteria decision making problem [P. K. Das, R. Borgohain, International Journal of Computer Applications 38(12) (2012) 33-37]”. M. Akgül, İ. Yılmaz, A. İpek (Eds.), International Conference on Mathematical Studies and Applications, 2018, pp. 173-178, Karaman, Turkiye.
15. Enginoğlu, S., Memiş, S., “A new approach to the criteria-weighted fuzzy soft max-min decision-making method and its application to a performance-based value assignment problem”, Journal of New Results in Science, 9(1), 2020, pp. 19-36.
16. Enginoğlu, S., Memiş, S., Arslan, B., “A fast and simple soft decision-making algorithm:
EMA18an”. M. Akgül, İ. Yılmaz, A. İpek (Eds.), International Conference on Mathematical Studies and Applications, 2018, pp. 428-436, Karaman, Turkiye.
17. Enginoğlu, S., Memiş, S., Arslan, B., “Comment (2) on soft set theory and uni-int decision-making [European Journal of Operational Research, (2010) 207, 848-855]”. Journal of New Theory (25), 2018, pp. 84-102.
18. Enginoğlu, S., Memiş, S., Öngel, T., “A fast and simple soft decision-making algorithm:
EMO18o”. M. Akgül, İ. Yılmaz, A. İpek (Eds.), International Conference on Mathematical Studies and Applications, 2018, pp. 179-187, Karaman, Turkiye.
19. Enginoğlu, S., Memiş, S., Öngel, T., “Comment on soft set theory and uni-int decision making [European Journal of Operational Research, (2010) 207, 848-855]”. Journal of New Results in Science, 7(3), 2018, pp. 28-43.
20. Enginoğlu, S., Memiş, S., Çağman, N., “A generalisation of fuzzy soft max-min decision-making method and its application to a performance-based value assignment in image denoising”. El-Cezerî Journal of Science and Engineering, 6(3), 2019, pp. 466-481.
21. Enginoğlu. S., Memiş, S., Karaaslan, F. “A new approach to group decision-making method based on TOPSIS under fuzzy soft environment”, Journal of New Results in Science, 8(2), 2019, pp. 42-52.
22. Aydın, T., Enginoğlu, S., “Configurations of SDM methods proposed between 1999 and 2012: A Follow-Up Study”. K. Yıldırım (Ed.), International Conference on Mathematics:
“An Istanbul Meeting for World Mathematicians”, 2020, pp. 192-211, İstanbul, Turkiye.
23. Xu, Z., Yager, R. R., “Some geometric aggregation operators based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets”. International Journal of General Systems, 35(4), 2006, pp. 417-433.
24. Erkan, U., Gökrem, L., “A new method based on pixel density in salt and pepper noise removal”. Turkish Journal of Electrical Etablengineering and Computer Sciences, 26(1), 2018, pp. 162-171.
25. Srinivasan, K. S., Ebenezer, D., “A new fast and efficient decision-based algorithm for removal of high-density impulse noises”. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 14(3), 2007, pp.
189-192.
26. Esakkirajan, S., Veerakumar, T., Subramanyam, A. N., PremChand, C. H., “Removal of high-density salt and pepper noise through modified decision based unsymmetric trimmed median filter”. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 18(5), 2012, pp. 287-290.
27. Toh, K. K. V., Isa, N. A. M., “Noise adaptive fuzzy switching median filter for salt-and-pepper noise reduction”. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 17(3), 2010, pp. 281-284.
28. Erkan, U., Gökrem, L., Enginoğlu, S., “Different applied median filter in salt and pepper noise”. Computers and Electrical Engineering, 70, 2018, pp. 789-798.
29. Tang, Z., Yang, Z., Liu, K., Pei, Z., “A new adaptive weighted mean filter for removing high-density impulse noise”. Proceeding SPIE 10033, Eighth International Conference on Digital Image Processing (ICDIP), C. M. Falco, X. Jiang (Eds.), 1003353, 2016, pp. 1-5.
30. Enginoğlu, S., Erkan, U., Memiş, S., “Pixel similarity-based adaptive Riesz mean filter for salt-and-pepper noise removal”. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 78, 2019, pp. 35401-35418.
31. Wang, Z., Bovik, A., Sheikh, H., Simoncelli, E., “Image quality assessment: From error visibility to structural similarity”. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 13(4), 2004, pp.
600-612.
32. Sheikh, H. R., Bovik, A. C., “Image information and visual quality”. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 15(2), 2006, pp. 430-444.
33. Aydın, T., Enginoğlu, S., “Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy parameterized interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy soft matrices and their application to performance-based value assignment to noise removal filters”. Computational and Applied Mathematics, 41(4), 2022, pp. 1-45.
34. Memiş, S., Enginoğlu, S., Erkan, U. “A classification method in machine learning based on soft decision-making via fuzzy parameterized fuzzy soft matrices”. Soft Computing, 26, 2022, pp. 1165-1180.
35. Memiş, S., Enginoğlu, S., Erkan, U., “A new classification method using soft decision-making based on an aggregation operator of fuzzy parameterized fuzzy soft matrices”.
Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, 30(3), 2022, pp. 871-890.