• Sonuç bulunamadı

Platelet reactivity unit (PRU) in patients undergoing elective PCI: Rethinking the optimal cut point

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Platelet reactivity unit (PRU) in patients undergoing elective PCI: Rethinking the optimal cut point"

Copied!
1
0
0

Yükleniyor.... (view fulltext now)

Tam metin

(1)

To the Editor,

High residual platelet reactivity (PR) in patients on

clopi-dogrel therapy is associated with thrombotic events after

percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting

stents. It is well documented that determining an optimal PR

cut-off point helps to better predict major adverse

cardio-vascular events (MACE). In addition, determining the optimal

PR cut-off point helps to sufficiently suppress the platelet

ag-gregation to prevent thrombotic events after PCI. However,

the measurements of platelet function in patients on

clopido-grel therapy have indicated wide variability in P2Y12

inhibi-tion level (1), which is relatively explicated by genetic

poly-morphisms encoding CYP2C19 as well as the hepatic enzyme

CYP450. In this regard, several studies have selected different

PR cut-off points to identify high-risk patients. For example, in

a study with 660 patients, Nakamura et al. (2) found that the

optimal platelet reactivity unit (PRU) cut-off point for

prevent-ing MACE after PCI is 262. In another study by Marcucci et al.

(3), the PRU cut-off point of 240 was shown to be predictive of

MACE. Koltowski et al. (4) considered the PRU cut-off point

of 208 PRU (measured using the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay) as

inadequate platelet inhibition.

Much inconsistency exists in the literature concerning the

selection of optimal PR cut-off point in patients on clopidogrel

therapy undergoing elective PCI. It important that the optimal

PRU cut-off point in patients treated with clopidogrel has not

been discussed in the 2011 American College of Cardiology

(ACC) / American Heart Association Guideline for PCI (5).

There-fore, selecting the optimal PRU cut-off point warrants further

investigations. The optimal PRU cut-off point should be studied

and integrated in the current clinical practice guidelines so that

it becomes a standard of practice for PCI.

Hassan Sharifi1,2, Valiollah Habibi3, Amir Emami Zeydi2

Department of 1Medical-Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing and

Midwifery, Iranshahr University of Medical Sciences; Iranshahr-Iran Department of 2Medical-Surgical Nursing, Student Research

Committee, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences; Mashhad-Iran

Department of 3Cardiac Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Mazandaran

University of Medical Sciences; Sari-Iran

References

1. Stone GW, Witzenbichler B, Weisz G, Rinaldi MJ, Neumann FJ, Metzger DC, et al. Platelet reactivity and clinical outcomes after coronary artery implantation of drug-eluting stents (ADAPT-DES): a prospective multicentre registry study. Lancet 2013; 382: 614-23. 2. Nakamura M, Isshiki T, Kimura T, Ogawa H, Yokoi H, Nanto S, et

al. Optimal cut-off value of P2Y12 reaction units to prevent major adverse cardiovascular events in the acute periprocedural period: Post-hoc analysis of the randomized PRASFIT-ACS study. Int J Car-diol 2015; 182: 541-8. [CrossRef]

3. Marcucci R, Gori AM, Paniccia R, Giusti B, Valente S, Giglioli C, et al. Cardiovascular death and nonfatal myocardial infarction in acute coronary syndrome patients receiving coronary stenting are predicted by residual platelet reactivity to ADP detected by a point-of-care assay: a 12-month follow-up. Circulation 2009; 119: 237-42. 4. Koltowski L, Tomaniak M, Aradi D, Huczek Z, Filipiak KJ, Kochman

J, et al. Optimal aNtiplatelet pharmacotherapy guided by bedSIDE genetic or functional TESTing in elective PCI patients: A pilot study: ONSIDE TEST pilot. Cardiol J 2017 Mar 10. Epub ahead of print. 5. Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, Bailey SR, Bittl JA, Cercek

B, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coro-nary Intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. Circulation 2011; 124: e574-651. [CrossRef]

Address for Correspondence: Amir Emami Zeydi Student Research Committee Department of Medical Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad-Iran

Phone: +989355952357 Fax: +985138591511 E-mail: emamizeydi@yahoo.com

©Copyright 2017 by Turkish Society of Cardiology - Available online at www.anatoljcardiol.com

DOI:10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2017.7939

Anatol J Cardiol 2017; 18: 163-4 Letters to the Editor

164

Platelet reactivity unit (PRU) in patients

undergoing elective PCI: Rethinking the

optimal cut point

Referanslar

Benzer Belgeler

Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate the level of genome (DNA and chro- mosomal) damage in the peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBLs) of patients with ACS using the comet

A study involving 671 myocardial infarction patients treated with PCI in the TRANSLATE-ACS Registry who had undergone VerifyNow PFT concluded that intensification of the

CI - confidence interval; DPR - dual poor responsiveness; HTPR - high on-treatment platelet reactivity; NYHA - New York Heart Association; PRA - poor responsiveness to aspirin; PRC

CYP3A4*1B polymorphism may be an independent determi- nant of poorer response to clopidogrel in patients with ACS, al- though the variability in response to clopidogrel explained by

Use of ticlopidine and cilostazol after intracoronary drug-eluting stent placement in a patient with previous clopidogrel-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenic pur- pura: a

Use of ticlopidine and cilostazol after intracoronary drug-eluting stent placement in a patient with previous clopidogrel-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenic pur- pura: a

The main fi ndings of our study can be summarized as fol- lows: (i) In the Turkish population, 30.2% of patients diagnosed with ACS or stable coronary artery disease

Mean platelet volume as a surrogate marker of long-term mortality in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Clinical outcome prediction from mean platelet volume