• Sonuç bulunamadı

Does the incidence of metabolic syndrome vary between the different phenotypes of PCOS in adolescents?

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Does the incidence of metabolic syndrome vary between the different phenotypes of PCOS in adolescents?"

Copied!
20
0
0

Yükleniyor.... (view fulltext now)

Tam metin

(1)

 

Does  the  incidence  of  metabolic   syndrome  vary  between  the   different  phenotypes  of  PCOS  in  

adolescents?  

Derya  Akdağ  Cırık,  M.D.  

 

 

Etlik  Zübeyde  Hanım  Women’s  Health   Training  and  Research  Hospital  

   

MSRM  2016  

(2)

PCOS  in  adolescents  

•  PolycysDc  ovary  syndrome  (PCOS)  is  the  most  

frequent  endocrine  disorder  in  reproducDve-­‐aged   women.    

•  Well-­‐known  triad  of  PCOS    includes          -­‐  chronic  anovulaDon,    

     -­‐  hyperandrogenism,        -­‐    polycysDc  ovaries    

•  RoQerdam  criteria  à  4  reproducDve  phenotypes    

(3)

PCOS  in  adolescents  

•  Exact  cause  is  unknown  

•  Evidence  suggest  geneDc  origin  

•  Excess  androgens  produced  in  ovaries  during   puberty  is  supposed  to  be  the  iniDaDng  factor    

Roe  et  al,  2011  

•  Androgens  promote  insulin  resistance  that  might   lead  to  metabolic  dysfuncDon  in  later  years.  

•  PCOS  is  accepted  as  both  reproducDve  and   metabolic  disorder  

(4)

Metabolic  Syndrome  (MS)  

•  MS  is  the  end  point  of  this  metabolic  dysfuncDon   in  PCOS.  

•  MS  à  Coronary  artery  disease  à  Mortality  

•  MS  incidence  à  as  high  as  38%  even  in   adolescence  with  PCOS.  

Coviello  et  al,  2006  

•  The  screening  and  detecDon  is  vital  and  -­‐  AES   (Androgen  Excess  Society)  recommends  

screening  to  decrease  future  cardiovascular   event.  

Salley  et  al,  2007  

(5)

ObjecFve  of  the  study  

•  To  determine  whether  the  incidence  and  

parameters  of  metabolic  syndrome  differ  in   four  PCOS  phenotypes  in  adolescents.  

•  Phenotype  A:    H  +  A  +  P  

•  Phenotype  B:    H  +  A  

•  Phenotype  C:    H  +  P  

•  Phenotype  D:  O  +  P  

(6)

Study  Design  

SeIng:  At  the  Youth  Center  clinic  at  a  terDary   referral  hospital  in  Ankara,  Turkey.  

 

ParFcipants  and  study  protocol:    

•  114  consecuDve  adolescents  with  newly   diagnosed  PCOS  (n=144)  with  RoQerdam  

criteria  were  classified  into  four  phenotypes.  

     

(7)

 

Study  Design  

Measurements  and  Lab  Tests  

 

•  Body  mass  index,  waist  circumference  

•  Blood  pressure,  Sonographic  examinaDon  

•  Lipid  Profile  (TG,  Cholesterol,  HDL,  LDL)  

•  Hormone  Profile  (FSH,  LH,  E2,  T,  DHEAS,  17OHP)  

•  FasDng  glucose,  HOMA-­‐IR  

(8)

 

Study  Design  

Metabolic  syndrome  -­‐  IDF  criteria  

 

•  Central  obesity,  defined  as  a  WC  ≥  80  cm(absolute)  

•  The  presence  of  two  of  following  four  criteria  was   required  

(1)  TG  ≥  150  mg/dl;    

(2)  HDL  <  50  mg/dl;    

(3)  FasDng  plasma  glucose  ≥100  mg/dl;    

(4)  Systolic/diastolic  blood  pressure  ≥  130/85  mmHg.  

(9)

Results  

•  The  mean  age  was  17.25  ±  1.22,  and  the  ages   are  similar  in  all  phenotypes.    

Of  all,    

•  Oligomenorrhea  (76.4%),  

•  HirsuDsm  (75.7%).    

•  History  of  PCOS  in  their  family  (43.2%).    

(10)

Table  1:  Metabolic  and  hormonal  characterisFcs  of   adolescents  with  PCOS    

CharacterisFcs Phenotype  A Phenotype  B Phenotype  C Phenotype  D p  value

BMI 27.16  ±  4.14 25.14  ±  3.87 24.98  ±  4.05 25.32  ±  4.14 p=0.006a

WC  (cm) 0.84  (0.08) 0.77  (0.14) 0.78  (0.15) 0.79  (0.10) p=0.007b

FasDng  glucose  (mg/dl) 90  (9.0) 87  (10.0) 86  (9.0) 88  (8.0) p=0.016

Insulin  (µIU/ml) 9.98  (2.32) 10.20  (2.08) 9.76  (2.10) 9.15  (3.08) p=0.427

HOMA-­‐IR 2.17  (0.77) 2.15  (0.84) 2.14  (0.60) 1.94  (0.68) p=0.122

Systolic  BP  (mmhg) 115.0  (10.0) 110.0  (10.0) 110  (10.0) 110  (10.0) p=0.262

Diastolic  BP  (mmhg) 73.7  (10.0) 71.3  (5.0) 72.6  (10.0) 69.7  (5.0) p=0.192

a:  A  vs  BCD,          b:  A  vs  BCD  

(11)

Table  1:  Metabolic  and  hormonal  characterisFcs  of   adolescents  with  PCOS    

CharacterisFcs Phenotype  A Phenotype  B Phenotype  C Phenotype  D p  value

Testosterone  (ng/ml) 0.8  (0.4) 0.8  (0.2) 0.7  (0.3) 0.6  (0.2) p<0.001d

FSH  (IU/L) 5.19  (2.12) 5.60  (2.12) 5.03  (2.59) 5.40  (1.87) p=0.621

LH  (IU/L) 9.88  (2.76) 10.55  (2.77) 9.16  (4.70) 8.33  (2.68) p=0.002e

DHEAS  (µg/dl) 221.0  (94.0) 201.5  (136.0) 171.5  (118.0) 174.5  (108.0) p=0.42

17  OH  Prog  (ng/ml) 0.98  (0.18) 0.96  (0.25) 0.95  (0.20) 0.89  (0.34) p=0.48

Cholesterol  (mg/dl) 176.0  (42.0) 160  (39.0) 182.5  (45.0) 154.5  (39.0) p=0.11

TG  (mg/dl) 134.0  (74.0) 95.0  (28.0) 100.5  (57.0) 100.0  (35.0) p=0.12

LDL  (mg/dl) 87.5  (24.0) 88.0  (19.0) 90.0  (19.0) 78.0  (19.0) p=0.10

HDL  (mg/dl) 37.0  (9.0) 39.0  (10.0) 39.5  (11.0) 39.0  (7.0)                        p=0.29

d:  ABC  vs  D,        e:  ABC  vs  D  

(12)

Table  2:  Parameters  of  metabolic  syndrome  in  four   PCOS  phenotypes  (n=144,  %)    

Overall  Data:  

Seventy-­‐nine  (54.9%)  of  144  paDents  in  cohort  were  overweight.  

Thirty-­‐seven  (25.7%)    of  144  paDents  were  diagnosed  as  metabolic  syndrome  

  Phenotype  A Phenotype  B Phenotype  C Phenotype  D p  value

Abdominal  obesity 31  (81.6%) 30  (76.9%) 27  (79.4%) 28  (24.1%) 0.85

Hypertension 8  (21.1%) 4  (10.3%) 5  (14.7%) 2  (6.1%) 0.27

TG  ≥  150  (mg/dl) 17  (44.7%) 8  (20.5%) 8  (23.5%) 5  (15.2%) 0.023

HDL  <  50  (mg/dl) 33  (86.9%) 31  (79.5%) 28  (82.4%) 30  (90.9%) 0.56

Glu  ≥  100  (mg/dl) 7  (18.4%) 2  (5.1%) 4  (11.8%) 1  (3.0%) 0.11

Mets  (IDF) 15  (39.5%) 8  (20.5%) 9  (26.5%) 5  (15.2%) 0.10

(13)

Table  3:  Comparison  of  the  endocrinologic  and  metabolic  parameters  in  PCOS   adolescents  with  and  without  metabolic  syndrome  (n=144)    

   CharacterisFcs Adolescents  without  Metabolic   syndrome  

Adolescents  with  Metabolic   Syndrome

                         p  value

Age  (years) 17.26  ±  1.22 17.21  ±  1.25 0.84

BMI  (kg/m2) 24.46  ±  3.30 29.63  ±  3.26 <0.001

WC  (cm) 68.0  (15.0) 88.0  (8.0) <0.001

FasDng  glucose  (mg/dl) 87.0  (8.0) 94.0  (14.0) <0.001

Insulin  (µIU/ml) 9.2  (2.61) 10.8  (2.08) <0.001

HOMA-­‐IR 1.98  (0.58) 2.56  (0.79) <0.001

Cholesterol  (mg/dl) 158.0  (36.0) 197.0  (21.0) <0.001

Triglyceride  (mg/dl) 92.0  (28.0) 153.0  (12.0) <0.001

LDL  (mg/dl) 80.0  (20.0) 92.5  (19.0) 0.003

HDL  (mg/dl) 40.0  (10.0) 35.0  (9.0) <0.001

Testosterone  (ng/ml) 0.70  (0.24) 0.82  (0.35) 0.004

DHEA-­‐S  (ng/ml) 205.0  (135.0) 221.0  (117.0) 0.95

FSH  (IU/L) 5.25  (2.10) 5.35  (2.27) 0.59

LH  (IU/L) 9.37  (3.87) 10.11  (3.18) 0.21

(14)

Discussion  

•  In  this  study,  overweight  54.9  %,    

                                                       metabolic  syndrome  25.7  %.  

•  30  Iranian  adol  à  overweight  52.0  %  

                                                                         metabolic  syndrome  33  %  

Rahmanpour  et  al.  

•  128  Chinese  adol  à  metabolic  syndrome  4.7%  

Huang  et  al.  

Healthy  Turkish  girls  à  metabolic  syndrome    4.0  %    Agirbasli  et  al,  2009  

 

 

(15)

Discussion  

•  Although,  insulin  resistance  and  HDL  levels  are   similar  in  all  phenotypes.  

•  Obesity  and  waist  circumference  are  higher  in   phenotype  A.  

•  MS  incidence  highest  in  phenotype  A  (39.5  %)                                                              lowest  in  phenotype  D  (15.2  %)    

 

(16)

Discussion  

•  In  this  study,  the  incidence  of  metabolic   syndrome  in    

normal-­‐weight  adolescents  was  6.1%;      

increased    to  25.5%  in  overweight  adolescents   and  67.7%  in  obese  adolescents  (data  not  shown).    

•  Obesity  deteriorates  metabolic  dysfuncDon  in   adolescents  with  PCOS.    

(17)

Discussion  

•  The  PCOS  adolescents  with  metabolic  syndrome   were  also  found  to  have  higher  testosterone  levels   than  those  without  metabolic  syndrome.    

•  Higher  free  testosterone  levels  in  adolescent  PCOS   with  metabolic  syndrome  

 Coviello  et  al,  2006  

•   More  severe  lipid  profile  in  androgenic  

phenotypes  

FruzeF  et  al,  2009  

(18)

Strenghts  and  limitaFons  

•  This  is  the  first  study  that  has  invesDgated  the   incidence  of  metabolic  syndrome  in  four  PCOS   phenotypes    

•  The  endocrinologic  and  metabolic  parameters   were  compared  in  detail.    

•  Single  center  study  

•  Cross  secDonal  study,  not  comment  on  

whether  metabolic  profile  will  change  unDl   adulthood.  

(19)

Conclusion  

•  One  in  four  adolescents  with  PCOS  in  our   populaDon  had  metabolic  syndrome.    

•  Obesity  and  hyperandrogenism  worsen  the  MS.  

•  MulDcenter  studies  with  different  ethnic  

populaDons  and  follow-­‐up  studies  are  required   to  evaluate  the  risk  factors  for  metabolic  

syndrome  and  further  development  of     cardiovascular  disease.  

(20)

Thank  you  for  your  a]enFon  

Referanslar

Benzer Belgeler

Sensöriyel bloğun L1 dermatomu- na gerileme süresi hiperbarik bupivakain grubunda, ropivakain gruplarına göre anlamlı olarak uzun bulun­.. du

Effect of routine controlled cord traction as part of the active management of the third stage of labor on postpartum hemorrhage:. multicenter randomized controlled

The present study was performed to evaluate the frequency of MetS and related long-term chronic health problems (such as DM, thyroid dysfunction, HT, hyperlipidemia, and anemia)

(20) revealed in their study that total cholesterol, LDL-C, triglyceride values and blood pres- sure increased and HDL-C decreased in patients with SCH.. Caron

The salient findings of our study are that metabolic syndrome prevalence and uric acid levels were higher in psoriasis patients compared with those in healthy control group, and

If 1 of the diagnostic criteria defined by ACE-ACCE (i.e. hypertension, obesity, diabetes mellitus, dyslipid- emia) was present, presence of at least another metabolic syn-

The results were: a- the prevalence of metabolic syndrome among subjects aged 30 years and over was 28% in men and 45% in women, b- low se- rum HDL cholesterol concentration and

Metabolic syndrome (3.6 fold) and increased levels of fasting blood glucose (1.1 fold), uric acid (2.2 fold), gamma-glutamyl transferase (1 fold), high-sensitivity CRP (1.1